Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues. Baltimore Marriott Waterfront Hotel

Similar documents
AHLA. O. Stark and Reimbursement: A Deeper Dive to Debunk the Myths. Alice G. Gosfield Alice G. Gosfield & Associates PC Philadelphia, PA

Hospital Outpatient Services: New CMS Supervision Requirements Complying With the New Rules to Protect Medicare Reimbursement

Stark, False Claims and Anti- Kickback Laws: Easy Ways to Stay Compliant with the Big Three in Healthcare

Medicare: "Complex regulatory structure."

Audio Title: Revised and Clarified Place of Service (POS) Coding Instructions Audio Date: 6/3/2015 Run Time: 16:03 Minutes ICN:

AVOIDING HEALTHCARE FRAUD AND ABUSE; Responsibility, Protection, Prevention

2009 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule

STARK AND REIMBURSEMENT: A DEEPER DIVE TO DEBUNK THE MYTHS. Alice G. Gosfield, Esquire Alice G. Gosfield and Associates, P.C.

HOT TOPICS IN HEALTHCARE FRAUD. Presented by: Jeffrey W. Dickstein and Amy L. Easton Phillips and Cohen LLP

Jurisdiction Nebraska. Retirement Date N/A

Highmark Reimbursement Policy Bulletin

Medicare Diagnostic Testing, Anti-Markup Restrictions and IDTF Standards THOMAS W. GREESON, DANIEL H. MELVIN TABLE OF CONTENTS

Provider-Based Status, Under Arrangements, and Related Medicare Requirements

I. Disclosure Requirements for Financial Relationships Between Hospitals and Physicians

The Intersection of Compliance and Quality Health Care Compliance Association North Central Regional Annual Conference

Compliance Program, Code of Conduct, and HIPAA

2009 Final Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (CMS-1403-FC) Rule Summary

ENROLLMENT APPLICATION

Highlights of Program Integrity Provisions Managed Care Delivery System Subcommittee June 9, 2011

A Day in the Life of a Compliance Officer

2018 No. 7: Radiology and Pathology/Laboratory Services

MEDICAID ENROLLMENT PACKET

Provider-Based Hospital Departments Are We Compliant?

AHLA Medicare & Medicaid Institute

AMERICAN HEALTH LAWYERS ASSOCIATION Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues. March 20-22, 2013 Baltimore, MD

Provider Based Status Compliance: Space Sharing and Reimbursement Charges

ANCILLARY/FACILITY APPLICATION CREDENTIALING / RE-CREDENTIALING

Case 1:11-cv KD-B Document 21 Filed 01/30/13 Page 1 of 43

Responding to Today s Health Care Regulatory Environment

Compliance Program Code of Conduct

San Francisco Department of Public Health

One Year Later THE IMPACT OF HEALTH CARE REFORM on Health Care Provider Audits and Compliance Programs

Reimbursement Information for Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Services 1

Compliance Considerations for Clinical Laboratories

Physician Referral: Laws, Rules, and Ethics

6/25/2013. Knowledge and Education. Objectives ZPIC, RAC and MAC Audits. After attending this presentation, the attendees will be able to :

Medicare s Electronic Health Records Incentive Program- Overview

Case Studies in Billing Gone Badly

The OIG. What is the OIG

American Health Lawyers Association Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues. History of the Physician Fee Schedule

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. Jury Trial Demanded COMPLAINT

What Happened to Hospital Off-Campus Outpatient Departments and How is it Going to Impact Our Business? An ACC Health Law Committee Quick Hit

FEDERAL AND NYS TARGETED RISK AREAS FOR HOME HEALTH AGENCIES AND COMPLIANCE STRATEGIES

Expanded Scope of Practice in the Pharmacy Setting: Current Trends and Future State for Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians

Compliance Issues For Multi-Provider Collaborations: How To Spot & Avoid Potential Pitfalls

November 16, Dear Dr. Berwick:

April, 2007 QUESTIONABLE PRACTICES BY HOSPICES AND NURSING HOMES UNDER HEALTH CARE FRAUD AND ABUSE RULES

Hospital Outpatient 1206(d) Clinics Legal Considerations Impacting Physicians

Compliance Program Updated August 2017

RULES OF ALABAMA STATE BOARD OF HEALTH ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH CHAPTER FREESTANDING EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS

Blue Membership as of November Penalty Due for Failure to Obtain Authorizations. Physician Anatomical Pathology Services Medicare Moratorium

CURRENT OIG ENFORCEMENT INITIATIVES: A ROAD MAP FOR HIGH RISK COMPLIANCE AREAS

Proposed Fraud & Abuse Rule Implementing ACA Provisions. Ivy Baer October 26, 2010

Technical Component (TC), Professional Component (PC/26), and Global Service Billing

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER BILLING COMPLIANCE PLAN

1/26/2017. Compliance and Overpayments. Agenda. Health Care Compliance Association Orlando Regional Conference 2017

Guidelines and Strategies for Navigating Stark s Physician Recruitment Exception

Diane Meyer, CHC (650) Agenda

CDx ANNUAL PHYSICIAN CLIENT NOTICE

AMBULATORY SURGERY FACILITY GENERAL INFORMATION

CONDUCTING A COMPLIANCE REVIEW OF HOSPITAL- PHYSICIAN FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS

RECOVERY AUDIT CONTRACTORS

Leslie Demaree Goldsmith

Telehealth Legal and Compliance Issues. Nathaniel Lacktman, Anna Whites, Esq.

Hospice House Network Inpatient Conference

2013 AHLA Physicians and Physicians Organization Law Institute. Presented by Judd Harwood & Lori Foley. Agenda

Executive Summary, November 2015

Analysis. Tracking Referrals: When Does a Hospital s Review of Referral Source Information Pose Stark Law Risks?

Defense Health Agency Program Integrity Office

Managing Business Relationships to Thrive and Comply

1. The new state-based insurance exchange for small businesses (SHOP) stands for:

Retail Clinics in Healthcare: Overcoming Complex Legal Challenges

MEMORANDUM. TO: Infectious Diseases Society of America FROM: King & Spalding

OIG Risk Areas: Anti- Supplementation; Therapy Services, Physicial Self-Referral & Hospice

INSTITUTE ON MEDICARE/MEDICAID PAYMENT ISSUES MEDICARE CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION: WHAT IS YOUR GRADE?

OIG Opines On Propriety Of ED On-Call Coverage Arrangements By Michael Paddock and Lauren Kim, Crowell & Moring LLP*

G-2. Report. Compliance. Laboratory outreach programs face some special billing challenges

The Importance of the Conditions of Participation for Hospitals

CAHABA GOVERNMENT BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS (GBA) PROVIDER-BASED ATTESTATION STATEMENT. Main Provider Medicare Provider Number:

Medicare Advantage and Part D Compliance Training. 42 CFR Parts and

NPI Medicare Policy on Subpart Designation. Provider Types Affected

Fraud, Abuse, & Waste, Oh My! Developing an Effective Compliance Program

42 CFR Ch. IV ( Edition)

HealthStream Regulatory Script. Corporate Compliance: A Proactive Stance. Version: [February 2007]

Medicare Provider-Based Designation Attestation

State of West Virginia DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES Office of Inspector General Board of Review 203 E. 3 rd Avenue Williamson, WV 25661

LOUISIANA REVISED STATUTE 37: THE LOUISIANA RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGIST LICENSING LAW

March 15, Glenn Hackbarth, JD Chairman Medicare Payment Advisory Commission 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW Suite 9000 Washington, DC

OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY

CCT Exam Study Manual Update for 2018

TITLE 37. HEALTH -- SAFETY -- MORALS CHAPTER HOSPITALS HOSPITAL MEASURES ADVISORY COUNCIL. Go to the Ohio Code Archive Directory

Compliance Hotspots for CCBHCs

MLN Matters Number: MM6740 Revised Related Change Request (CR) #: Related CR Transmittal #: R1875CP Implementation Date: January 4, 2010

CONDUCTING A COMPLIANCE REVIEW OF HOSPITALPHYSICIAN FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS

FRAUD, COMPLIANCE, & EMERGENCY MEDICINE. DEVELOPED BY ACEP EXCLUSIVELY FOR ITS MEMBERS Revised August 2004

CareCore National & Alliance Provider Training Material

Shared and Incident To Billing of E/M Services in Radiation Oncology Updated November 2017

BlueOptions - Healthy Rewards HRA Plan

General Documentation Compliance. Review for Provider Reappointment

Facility Name: Street Address: City: County: State: Zip: Web Site Address: Office Manager Name: Phone and Ext:

Transcription:

Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues Baltimore Marriott Waterfront Hotel March 28-30, 2012 1

Diagnostic Imaging Accreditation and Regulatory Requirements Today s Talk Attack on Payment MPPR Supervision issues Accreditation nexus with supervision CMS regulatory policies / developments 2

Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction First (most expensive) procedure is paid at 100 percent of the Physician Fee Schedule amount. Payment for second and subsequent procedures is reduced by 50 percent. Prior to CY 2012, MPPR policy applied to: The technical component (TC) of certain diagnostic imaging procedures furnished to a beneficiary in the same session MRI and MRA, CT and CTA, and ultrasound CY 2012 Expansion of MPPR The MPFS final rule adopted the proposal to apply the MPPR to the PC of the second and subsequent advanced imaging services furnished in the same session. Full payment is made for the PC of the highest paid procedure. Payment is reduced by 25 percent to the PC of the second and subsequent advanced imaging services, furnished by the same physician, in the same session, on the same day. 3

Future In MPFS proposed Expansion rule CMS seeks of comments MPPR on how it might expand the MPPR policy We will be aggressively looking for efficiencies in other sets of codes... and will consider implementing more expansive reduction policies in CY 2013 and beyond. The following are under consideration: Apply the MPPR to the TC of all imaging services (would include x-ray, EKG, EEG, etc.). Apply the MPPR to the PC of all imaging services (would include x-ray, EKG, EEG, etc.). Apply the MPPR to the TC of all diagnostic tests (would include cardiology, pathology). Supervision of Diagnostic Tests Medicare Supervision Rules Physician Offices IDTFs Provider-Based Entities HOPPS Hospital 4

Supervision of Diagnostic Tests Do not apply to hospital inpatients Teaching physician regulations Supervision and interpretation of interventional procedures Supervision of Diagnostic Tests Levels of Supervision General Supervision Direct Supervision Personal Supervision 5

Level One General Supervision The supervising physician does not need to be present for the test, but he/she has overall responsibility for the control and direction of the service. Level Two Direct Supervision The supervising physician need not be in the room when the procedure is performed, but must be present in the same office suite and immediately available to assist if required. 6

Level Three Personal Supervision The supervising physician must be in the same room where the test is performed throughout the procedure. Supervision in an IDTF Supervising physician must be proficient in the performance and interpretation of the tests they supervise. False Claims Act case against MedQuest Associates in federal court in Tennessee. 7

Hobbs v. MedQuest: Statement of Issues on Appeal Did the District Court err in ruling on summary judgment that MedQuest knowingly submitted false or fraudulent claims when it billed Medicare for diagnostic tests with contrast that were medically necessary and properly performed, but that were not directly supervised by a boardcertified radiologist or carrier-approved physician? Did the District Court err in ruling on summary judgment that MedQuest knowingly submitted false or fraudulent claims when it billed Medicare for diagnostic tests performed at a facility that was an enrolled Medicare provider, but that the government asserts was improperly classified as a physician's practice rather than an "independent diagnostic testing facility"? Are the civil penalties imposed by the district court grossly disproportional to the gravity of the offense, in violation of the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment? False Claims Act (31 USC 3729-31) As amended by the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 (FERA), liability under the False Claims Act occurs when a person or entity: 1) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval; 2) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim; or 8

False Claims Act (31 USC 3729-31) (cont d) 3) conspires to commit a violation of any of certain provisions of the False Claims Act (including the two listed above). o Violations are punished by penalties of not less than $5,500 and not more than $11,000 per claim, plus treble damages for the amount of damages the Government sustains o Whistleblower (qui tam) suits are allowed o Reverse false claims provision now may reach selfdiscovered overpayments FCA actions can be based on Anti-kickback Statute and/or Stark Law violation. Why would one choose to enroll as an IDTF? 9

Supervision of Diagnostic Tests Non-Physicians Nurse Practitioners, Clinical Nurse Specialists and Physician Assistants are not physicians and may not function as supervising physicians under Medicare's Diagnostic Test Benefit. They may perform diagnostic tests pursuant to State Scope of Practice laws. 10

Supervision of Diagnostic Tests Performance of Diagnostic Tests by NPP NPP performs test (technical component only) requiring direct supervision NPP acting under his/her own benefit bill under NPP name and PIN Technical component reimbursed at 100% of MPFS Radiologist Assistants Radiology Practitioner Assistants Cannot supervise test for Medicare patient Cannot perform an invasive or surgical procedure for Medicare patients that are then billed under the NPI of a radiologist 11

HR 3032 Medicare Access to Radiology Care Act of 2011 Creates independent right to bill for RA services Payment to radiology group Does not permit RA to supervise a test HOPPS Supervision Rule Physician Supervision of Medicare Hospital Outpatient Diagnostic Tests 12

HOPPS Direct Physician Supervision Standard varies based on location: In the hospital or an on-campus providerbased department Off-campus provider-based department Under arrangement services HOPPS Direct Physician Supervision 2010 Rule In the hospital or an on-campus provider-based department "Direct supervision" means physician present on the same campus immediately available to furnish assistance and direction throughout the performance of the procedure (i.e., services) Does not require presence in the room "Immediately available" no specific spatial or temporal standard 13

HOPPS Direct Physician Supervision 2011 Rule In the hospital or an on-campus provider-based department "Direct supervision" means immediately available to furnish assistance and direction throughout the performance of the procedure (i.e., services) Does not require physical proximity "Immediately available" no specific spatial or temporal standard HOPPS Direct Physician Supervision 2010 Rule Off-campus provider-based department "Direct supervision" means physician present in the off-campus provider-based department of the hospital immediately available to furnish assistance and direction throughout the performance of the procedure (i.e., services) Does not require presence in the room Note: multi-site-of-service building problem 14

HOPPS Direct Physician Supervision 2011 Rule Off-campus provider-based department "Direct supervision" means immediately available to furnish assistance and direction throughout the performance of the procedure (i.e., services) Does not require physician proximity HOPPS Direct Physician Supervision Non-hospital location, i.e. mobile or fixed-site diagnostic testing facility furnishing services "under arrangements" "Direct supervision" means physician present in the office suite immediately available to furnish assistance and direction throughout the performance of the procedure (i.e., services) Does not require presence in the room 15

HOPPS Direct Physician Supervision Qualifications: Does the supervising physician for imaging services have to be a radiologist? Physician must be qualified to furnish "assistance and direction" HOPPS Rule: "knowledgeable" about the test Transmittal 128, May 28, 2010 Transmittal 137, December 30, 2010 Accreditation Its Nexus with Supervision 16

MIPPA The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008. Accreditation Required for Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Services: o MR o CT o Nuclear Medicine (including PET) By 2012 Mandates Qualifications of Non-Physician Personnel Qualifications of Medical Directors and Supervising Physicians 17

General Supervision The physician s overall direction and control, but the physician s presence is not required during the performance of the procedure. Supervision and the Anti-Markup Rule The physician who performs (supervises?) the TC must share the practice 75% of all services assigned to billing group; or on-site where ordering MD regularly furnishes services 18

Anti-Markup Rule Who is the performing physician for the TC of a diagnostic test? Place of Service Billing 11 Office 12 Home 21 Inpatient Hospital 22 Outpatient Hospital 99 Other 19

Place of Service / Date of Service Instructions (Transmittal 1823, CR 6375, October 2, 2009) Chapter 26, 10.6.1 et seq. Initially to be effective in 2010. Guidelines were delayed. CMS Transmittal 2407 February 3, 2012 Medicare Claims Processing Manual revised and clarified Place of Service (POS) coding instructions. 20

2012 Transmittal 2407 Place of Interpretation The place where technical component service was provided. POS for TC in Box 24-B. Zip Code for interpreting physician in Box 32. Does not cure carrier jurisdiction problem. Restrictions on Global Billing Global only if the same physician performed both the TC and the PC. See CMS Transmittal 1892 January 15, 2010 (Anti-Markup Rule) See CMS Transmittal 2407 February 3, 2012 (POS Instructions) 21

Also Restricting Global Billing Claims Process Manual, Chapter 1, 10.1.1(B) Claim submitted under new 5010 electronic standard location of health care services Paper claims require use of Zip codes of POS Date of Service No global billing for advanced imaging if DOS for TC and PC differ. 22

Anti-Markup Rule TC and PC Transmittal 1892 (CR 6733) (January, 2010) Mostly straightforward implements Antimarkup Rule But eliminates purchased interpretations and Zip Code billing by IDTFs Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 1 30.2.9 Payment to Physicians or Other Suppliers of Diagnostic Tests Anti-Markup Rule Purchased tests and purchased interpretations eliminated Anti-markup tests no reassignment Can bill using Zip Code of interpreting physician, regardless of state, when billing an anti-markup test (Transmittal 1892) 23

Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 1 10.1.1.3 Payment Jurisdiction for Reassigned Services The billing entity must submit claims to the B/MAC that has jurisdiction over the geographic area where the services were rendered. Suppliers and providers must also meet current enrollment criteria stated in Chapter 10 of the Program Integrity Manual in order to be able to bill for reassigned services. (Transmittal 1987) Thomas W. Greeson Reed Smith LLP 3110 Fairview Park Drive, #1400 Falls Church, Virginia 22042 703.641.4242 Direct 703.641.4340 Fax tgreeson@reedsmith.com Donald H. Romano Foley & Lardner LLP 3000 K Street NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20007-5109 Office (202) 945-6119 Fax (202) 672-5399 DRomano@foley.com 24