ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS. Classification & Documentation

Similar documents
WELCOME! Public Involvement 2 of 2: Public Involvement and NEPA

NEPA PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures for Environmental Documents

Guidance. Historical Studies Review Procedures

ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF THE US 59/LOOP 20/I-69W PROJECT

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage.

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 39 Environmental Review of Transportation Projects

STATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS FOR PENNSYLVANIA WASTEWATER PROJECTS. Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program

Draft Project Coordination Plan

Archeological Sites and Cemeteries

CDBG Crosscutting Issues: Environmental Review

Scope of Services for Environmental Assessment for Projects

Module 2 Planning and Programming

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

APPENDIX 1 BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES

Notice. Quality Assurance Statement

* Airport, *, Ohio AlP Project No * Grant Offer

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

-2- 4) The Corps will ensure the biological assessment is prepared in accordance with the Corps' "Biological Assessment Template."

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District

Chapter 3 Environmental Review Recipient Checklist

Comprehensive Planning Grant. Comprehensive Plan Checklist

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

DEVELOPING A GOOD PURPOSE AND NEED. Patrick Lee TxDOT Environmental Affairs Division

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Title 23 Refresher. FHWA Federal-Aid Program for Local Public Agencies

MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions

COORDINATION PLAN. As of November 14, 2011

TITLE VI IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Proposed Connector between Airline Highway (US 61) and Interstate 10 in St. John the Baptist Parish

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

COUNTY OF VENTURA ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES

Maintaining Project Consistency throughout the Project Development Process

CITY OF ORANGE LOCAL CEQA GUIDELINES

Appendix B Review Matrix Text & Table Footnotes

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Memo. Office of State Aid Metro District 1500 West County Rd B2 Roseville, MN Date: April 24, METRO DISTRICT COUNTIES and CITIES

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

Pecue Lane/I-10 Interchange Project Public Meeting Transcript

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

US-Mexico Border Water Infrastructure Program

EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION 1 TRANSPORTATION

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO CA PUBLIC NOTICE

North Carolina Department of Commerce Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 1 and 2 Kick-off Meeting April 15 Nacogdoches, Texas

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY GENERAL PERMIT

THE CORRADINO GROUP. RE: DRIC EPE/EIS Project; Job N TCG Project No Invoice No. 25 Progress Report.

Federal-Aid LPA Design Process Overview. MoDOT St. Louis District Local Programs

NCDOT Planning Summary for NCTA Projects

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) and SEIS Fact Sheet

Emergency Support Function (ESF) 16 Law Enforcement

1 Introduction. 1.1 Specific Plan Background

AGENDA. Regional Transportation Council Thursday, September 13, 2018 North Central Texas Council of Governments

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

Commonwealth Transportation Board Briefing

TxDOT Statewide 2017 TA Set-Aside Questions & Answers

TIER 2 RAAP Cutoff Dates Schedule\Column Descriptions Rev. 3/19/15

Strategic Projects Division

NORTHWEST SECTOR STUDY PHASE I REPORT. Approved 17 February 2015 (Resolution )

Non-Federal Cost Share Match Program Grant Implementation Checklist

Livability Through Smart Transportation (SMART) Program Guidance

Appendix F Public Meeting Summaries. F1: May 2013 Public Meeting Summary F2: September 2013 Public Meeting Summary

Tower 55 Rail Reliever Study

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

MAP-21 and Project Delivery: A Legal Perspective

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Northeast Minnesota Workshop

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

Scorecard Environmental Conference URBAN MOBILITY. Omni Corpus Christi Hotel 900 North Shoreline Blvd. Corpus Christi, Texas 78401

Special Approval per TAC Part A - LG Qualifications Statement (Local Government Agency management of project development process elements)

2018 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program Overview Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency

Limited Area Star Lake Comprehensive Plan. Neighborhood Meeting March 30, 2016

National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 740/ NCHRP (32): A Transportation Guide for All-Hazards Evacuation

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT

2013 Louisiana Transportation Conference

RFP for Bicycle/Pedestrian Scoping Study Page 1

HUD Environmental Review Online System

NEPA AND PRIVATE AIDS TO NAVIGATION

STATE HIGHWAY (SH) 34 FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC MEETING

Design-Build Procurement Overview Manual. Alternative Project Delivery

Welcome to the Public Meeting for the State Highway 68 Project. SH 68 Project Office Information Environmental Constraints & Study Corridors

US Army Corps of Engineers. Section 408 Overview. Regulatory Workshop July 22, Kim Leonard/Kevin Lee BUILDING STRONG

Subject: Request for Proposal Route 99 Interchanges at Hammett Road and Kiernan Avenue

DRAFT Subject to Modifications

PUBLIC NOTICE. Attn: Mr. Christopher Layton 1200 Duck Road Duck, North Carolina CB&I 4038 Masonboro Loop Road Wilmington, North Carolina 28409

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 484

Meeting Minutes. Project: Subject: Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 Location: Attendees:

LG PROJECTS ONLINE TOOLKIT. Statewide Planning Conference June 2016

NDOT Local Public Agency Manual April 6, 2017

BRF-009-9(73) IA 9 Black Hawk Bridge

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Regulation 20 November 2007 ER APPENDIX H POLICY COMPLIANCE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF DECISION DOCUMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS

SPECIFIC AND MASTER PLANS

Lancaster County Smart Growth Transportation Program (Updated March 2017)

Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended

Corridor Management Committee. September 5, 2012

Transcription:

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS Classification & Documentation

CLASSIFICATION

What s an Environmental Assessment? Not a Categorical Exclusion (CE) Not an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 3

Classification - Environmental Assessment CE actions are defined in Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 771.117. This guy just told us all about them. TxDOT 2016 4

Classification - Environmental Assessment There are SO many types of CEs to consider. Yet sometimes you still can t find one that matches your project activity. 5

Classification - Environmental Assessment When your project action doesn t clearly fall into one of the CE categories we look at EIS actions, outlined in Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 771.115. Some examples given include: A new controlled access freeway. A highway project of four or more lanes on a new location. New construction or extension of a separate roadway for buses or high occupancy vehicles not located within an existing highway facility. New construction or extension of fixed rail transit facilities (e.g., rapid rail, light rail, commuter rail, automated guideway transit). 6

Classification - Environmental Assessment How does TxDOT handle projects when the classification is on the cusp between a CE and an EA? C22 is an option because it s not defined by the type of action but by the nature of the project area (operational right-of-way (ROW), previously disturbed or maintained for a transportation purpose). Open-Ended (d)-list CE is another option for actions that are not specifically included on the (c)- and (d)-lists. There are a number of criteria that must be met. 7

Classification - Environmental Assessment Open-Ended (d)-list CEs: Do not have substantial controversy on environmental grounds Do not induce significant impacts to planned growth or land use for the area; Do not require the relocation of significant numbers of people; Do not have a significant impact on any natural, cultural, recreational, historic or other resource; Do not involve significant air, noise, or water quality impacts; Do not have significant impacts on travel patterns; Or do not otherwise, either individually or cumulatively, have any significant environmental impacts. 8

Classification request for an Open-Ended (d)-list CE How do you know if your project could be a candidate for an open-ended d- list CE? Project sponsor may have information available from contract scoping or preliminary research that indicates that their project may be a good candidate. Project sponsor will start the process of developing an EA with the formation of the core team. After reviewing scope development tool, desktop research, database searches, preliminary field reconnaissance, etc., core team may decide it s a good candidate. 9

Classification request for an Open-Ended (d)-list CE If it looks like criteria for an open ended (d)-list CE may be met, the project sponsor can submit a classification request addressed to the Project Delivery Section Director. Must include: Description of the project, Existing and proposed facilities, All associated CSJs, Outline the reasons why the sponsor believes the project meets the criteria (usually addressed point by point), Concurrence line. Submit with any supporting documentation (background research or scope development tool, etc.) Submit the classification request to the Project Delivery Manager for processing or directly to the Project Delivery Section Director if a Project Delivery Manager is not assigned. 10

Classification request for an EIS to an EA How does TxDOT handle projects when the classification is on the cusp between an EA and an EIS? Project description may be an action that would normally require an EIS, as outlined in Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 771.115. In some cases, the significance of impacts is not clearly established. Preliminary research or project scoping may indicate that probability of significant impacts is low. 11

Classification request for an EIS to an EA Under these circumstances, the project sponsor can submit a classification request addressed to the Environmental Affairs Division Director. Must include: Thorough description of the existing and proposed facilities, All associated CSJs, Amount of new ROW, Number of relocations (residential & commercial), Purpose and need, Planning and financial information, Preliminary assessment of potential environmental issues; cultural resource issues (including 4(f) or Section 106), public involvement, threatened and endangered species, air quality, traffic noise, hazardous materials, etc.), Concurrence line. Submit with any supporting documentation (background research or scope development tool, etc.) Submit the classification request to the Project Delivery Manager for processing. 12

DOCUMENTATION

Documentation Environmental Assessments Paperwork, Paperwork, Paperwork TxDOT 2016 14

Documentation Environmental Assessments New EA Handbook released June 2016. EA process outlined in less prescriptive manner compared to previous guidance and focuses more on EA content. Important Roles: Project sponsor - The entity responsible for preparing the EA and performing related tasks. Could be a local sponsor or a TxDOT District. Department delegate - The entity that approves the project scope, performs reviews, and ultimately approves the EA on behalf of TxDOT. For EAs, the delegate is the Environmental Affairs Division. Core Team - One District environmental specialist and one Project Delivery Manager. 15

Documentation Environmental Assessments Scoping - The project sponsor and ENV form and agree on the project work plan. Documentation: Database searches, Maps, Scope development tool, Meeting minutes from the project team kick-off meeting/conference call. The scope is developed in ECOS for TxDOT sponsored projects. For locally sponsored projects, a scope form (in the ENV toolkit) must also be filled out, signed, and uploaded into ECOS. 16

Documentation Environmental Assessments Meetings with Affected Property Owners (MAPO) - Informal meetings or calls; specifically with individuals and businesses to discuss planning details and other issues regarding the project. Documentation: Summary documenting the proceedings and any associated correspondence and back-up documentation. Summary content requirements are outlined in the public involvement handbook. Public Meeting Informal meetings with interested citizens, the general public, local governments, neighborhoods, or special interest groups. Documentation: Public Meeting Documentation Cover Page (available in the toolkit as of May 2016) and all the attachments listed on the cover page. 17

Documentation Environmental Assessments Technical Studies and Reports - The analysis phase of the process. The information in the reports support the summary and conclusions contained in the body of the EA. Documentation: Database searches, Maps, Modeling files, The reports themselves. 18

Documentation Environmental Assessments Agency Coordination - Coordination with resource agencies such as the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD), the Texas Historical Commission (THC), the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Documentation: Information packages we send to agencies (like a biological evaluation form or a coordination request letter), Coordination documents (like a biological assessment or cultural resources survey), Correspondence we receive in response (letter or emails requesting more information or demonstrating completion of coordination). 19

Documentation Environmental Assessments Draft EA - Must include the required content as outlined in the EA handbook. The project sponsor submits the Draft EA to the delegate for review and approval for circulation. Documentation: Administrative completeness checklist. Currently a checklist available in the ENV toolkit that the core team uses to compare the document and project file against the scope. It will eventually just be a check performed by core team against the EA outline. Notification of administrative completeness to the project sponsor for locally sponsored projects. Comment and response matrix. Template available in the ENV toolkit. 20

Documentation Environmental Assessments Approval for Circulation - The stage at which the document is approved for public review. Documentation: Environmental Document Review Checklist (EDRC) completed and signed by the core team. Environmental Document Certification Form (EDCF) completed and signed by the core team. 21

Documentation Environmental Assessments Notice of Availability and Public Hearing/Opportunity for Public Hearing - The project sponsor issues a notice of availability (NOA) of the EA and associated technical reports and either schedules a public hearing or affords the opportunity for a public hearing. Documentation: Template for Public Hearing Opportunity Cover Page and the associated appendices listed on the cover page OR Template for a Public Hearing Documentation Cover Page and the associated appendices listed on the cover page. 22

Documentation Environmental Assessments Project File - The project sponsor will maintain the documentation showing work completed in the course of developing the EA. ENV will generally request this documentation prior to issuing the environmental decision for a final project file review. 23

Documentation Environmental Assessments Final EA and FONSI - The project sponsor must revise the EA to address public comments and reflect the status of any additional agency coordination. If the EA concludes that there will be no significant impacts on the environment, the project sponsor then prepares a written FONSI (template and guidance are in the ENV toolkit) for ENV approval and issuance. Documentation: Revised/Final EA, FONSI, EDRC completed and signed by the core team, EDCF completed and signed by the core team, EPICs and PS&E Checklist, Transportation planning consistency documents. 24

Documentation Environmental Assessments NOA of FONSI - The project sponsor prepares and forwards an NOA for the signed FONSI to the appropriate MPO and agencies with an interest in the project. The delegate publishes the NOA for the FONSI on the official TxDOT website. Documentation: A copy of the notice, Distribution list for the notice, Screen shot of the notice on the department website. 25

Documentation Environmental Assessments Section 139(l) - The delegate publishes a Section 139(l) notice in the federal register, setting a 150-day statute of limitations period on challenging the EA/FONSI in court. This step is optional for an EA. Only applies to federal projects. Draft 139(l) notice requires legal review by General Counsel Division. Documentation: The copy of the final notice that is published in the federal register, uploaded into ECOS. 26

Q&A Questions? 27