HIV SERVICES ACUITY TOOL PILOT IMPLEMENTATION MEETING. October 16, 2014

Similar documents
Ryan White Part A FY 2017 Housing RFP RFP Conference. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Published November 23 rd, 2016

HIV HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING COUNCIL OF NEW YORK Mental Health Service Directive - Tri-County Approved by the HIV Planning Council 3/31/16

Indianapolis Transitional Grant Area Quality Management Plan (Revised)

Improving the Quality and Effectiveness of Medical Case Management HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau All Grantee Meeting Session 241, November 27, 2012

CASE MANAGEMENT POLICY

Project AIDS Care Waiver: Level of Need (LON) Assessment Case Management Tool

Establishing an HIV/AIDS Pharmacy Practice in an Underserved Inner City Environment Facilitators and Barriers

I. Description. Triage Counseling is an individual level intervention that establishes a direct link between primary. Rural

HAB/NQC HIV Cross-Part Care Continuum Collaborative (H4C) Frequently Asked Questions

RYAN WHITE HIV/AIDS PROGRAM SERVICES Definitions for Eligible Services

ORLANDO EMA HIV/AIDS RYAN WHITE Part A PROGRAM OUTPATIENT/AMBULATORY MEDICAL CARE SERVICE STANDARDS OF CARE

Medical Case Management

STANDARDS OF CARE HIV AMBULATORY OUTPATIENT MEDICAL CARE STANDARDS I. DEFINITION OF SERVICES

CASE MANAGEMENT STANDARDS OF CARE FOR RYAN WHITE ACT-FUNDED SERVICES IN ORANGE COUNTY

Ryan White Part A. Quality Management

2016 Funding Streams Overview for HIV/AIDS Services in the Boston Eligible Metropolitan Area

Baltimore-Towson EMA Part A Quality Management (QM) Plan I. Introduction

DRAFT. An Introduction to The ASAM Criteria for Patients and Families. What is The ASAM Criteria?

Ryan White Services Division Infectious Disease Bureau. Client Services Provider Manual FY Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Extension Act Part A

Friday, February 27, Closing Date for All Postings is Thursday, March 5, Community Renewal Team

ATTACHMENT II EXHIBIT II-C Effective Date: February 1, 2018 HIV/AIDS SPECIALTY PLAN

Collaborative Documentation Will Lower Risk!

MANAGED CARE READINESS

Ryan White Part A Quality Management

Working together to improve HIV/AIDS services in Nevada and the Las Vegas TGA

SHELTER PLUS CARE REFERRAL/APPLICATION PACKET

Module 2: Learning Objectives Module 2: Retention, Adherence, and Psychosocial Support in PMTCT Programs

THE LOS ANGELES CONTINUUM OF CARE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

o Recipients must coordinate these testing services with other HIV prevention and testing programs to avoid duplication of efforts.

SHELTER PLUS CARE REFERRAL/APPLICATION PACKET

Center for Community Collaboration Department of Psychology University of Maryland, Baltimore County November 9, 2009

Behavioral Wellness A System of Care and Recovery

!!!! CARE COORDINATION IMPLEMENTATION MANUAL !!!! VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SPECIAL PROJECTS OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

CORE COMPETENCIES INDEX

Balance of State Continuum of Care Program Standards for Permanent Supportive Housing Programs

MENTAL HEALTH / SUBSTANCE ABUSE QI NETWORK April 19, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. Ryan White Part A Program Office 115 S. Andrews Ave., Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

Discussion of Care Integration Best Practices & Challenges

Bridging practice and research: A Survey of evidence-based practices used in HIV Care for linkage, retention and adherence support

Ryan White Part A. Quality Management

Bureau of Community Sanctions Audit Standards

District Hospitals and Primary Care Clinics in Northern Cape Province

RYAN WHITE TITLE I SERVICE STANDARDS

Healthcare Worker Orientation Package on the Differentiated Care Operational Guide Participant s Manual January 2017

Welcome to the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) Training Presentation for Managed Medical Assistance Specialty Plans

Adherence Nurse. I. Description. Treatment Adherence Nurse is an individual level intervention designed to actively engage formerly

HealthStream Ambulatory Regulatory Course Descriptions

Skill 2: Client will identify triggers that have the greatest impact on his or her medical regimen

WESTMORELAND COUNTY BH/DS PROGRAM

Macomb County Community Mental Health Level of Care Training Manual

Medicaid 101: The Basics for Homeless Advocates

Service Review Criteria

PARTNERSHIP FOR HIV FREE SURVIVAL HEALTH FACILITY COACHING GUIDE: SECOND VISIT (JUNE 2013) BRIEFLY INTRODUCE ASSIST PROJECT AND TEAM

Prior Authorization and Continued Stay Criteria for Adult Serious Mentally Ill (SMI) Behavioral Health Residential Facility

CHAPTER 5. Conclusion, limitations and recommendations

Quality Improvement Work Plan

Ryan White Part A. Quality Management

Skill 2: Client will identify triggers that have the greatest impact on his or her medical. MODULE 3A, SESSION 1 (Clients RECEIVING medical treatment)

Request for Proposal Project Based Housing and Urban Development Vouchers that Serve the Homeless

Request for Proposal(s) for Adult or Youth Re- Entry Model Programs. An equal opportunity employer/program

Assertive Community Treatment (ACT)

Policy: A4 Alcohol and Illicit Drugs Procedure (Broadmoor Hospital only)

Critical Time Intervention (CTI) (State-Funded)

3. STANDARD COMMITTEE ITEMS Reminder: Meeting attendance confirmation required at least 48 hours prior to meeting date. data review.

GLOBAL PROGRAM. Strengthening Health Systems. Collaborative Partnerships with Health Ministries

Cleveland TGA Service Standard of Care

I. Description. Getting Started Intake Case Management is an individual level intervention for HIV+ individuals. Currently/Formally Incarcerated

Improving Service Delivery for Medicaid Clients Through Data Integration and Predictive Modeling

HIV-SPECIFIC QUALITY METRICS FOR MANAGED CARE

Whittier Street Health Center. Post Prison Release Program established February 2003

HOUSING ASSISTANCE AND RELATED SERVICES

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR SEASONS OF HOPE A SAFE HOUSE WITH OUTREACH PROGRAM. Re-released: August 8, 2011

Application Processing Procedures and Resident Selection Criteria

MEASURE DHS SERVICE PROVISION ASSESSMENT SURVEY HEALTH WORKER INTERVIEW

Stark State College Policies and Procedures Manual

Medicaid Funded Services Plan

The Improvement Journey; From Beginning to Continued Improvement

Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh - Home4Good Request for Proposals

EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT

NATIONAL RYAN WHITE HIV/AIDS PROGRAM PART B & ADAP MONITORING PROJECT ANNUAL REPORT

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF Behavioral Wellness A System of Care and Recovery. o--,-.m-a----,laa~-d-c~~~~~~~~~~-

Adult Learning. Initiation Client identifies adult learning need(s). Date

Department of Human Services PROPOSED FY 2019 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS. County Board Work Session February 28, 2018

Important! Before you submit this packet!

An Evidence-Based Practice Moving Us Closer to Zero:2016

Viral Load Suppression. Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Project Shawntrell Miles Jordan Health

HIV Prevention Innovation Fund Application guidance and terms of reference

DRUG MEDI-CAL ORGANIZED DELIVERY SYSTEM (DMC-ODS) PERFORMANCE METRICS. (version 6/23/17)

ILLINOIS 1115 WAIVER BRIEF

Ryan White Eligibility Determination and Recertification: Improving Efficiency

Transnational Practices and Engagement in Care: Lessons from NYC Rikers Island

Joint Commission quarterly update Medical record documentation guide and medical record reviews

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Note: 44 NSMHS criteria unmatched

Michigan Department of Community Health Part D Program QM Plan January 2008 Page 1 of 6

I. General Instructions

Patient Safety Course Descriptions

(c) A small client to staff caseload, typically 10:1, to consistently provide necessary staffing diversity and coverage;

MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

Anjali Sastry Fall 2013

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Community of Practice, Session #2. Presenters: Douglas Krakower, MD, Mike Yepes, B.Sc., Amir Dixon, BA 9 August 2016

Transcription:

HIV SERVICES ACUITY TOOL PILOT IMPLEMENTATION MEETING MDPH Office of HIV/AIDS & BPHC HIV/AIDS Ser vices Division October 16, 2014 1

AGENDA Background: How did we get here? Introducing the tool Components of the pilot project Q & A with contract managers and program coordinators Evaluation components and feedback process Practice session Wrap-up and next steps 2

BACKGROUND OF ACUITY BASED SYSTEM FY05 Case Management & Residential Support Services contract cycle Comprehensive CM assessment & acuity Self sufficiency outcomes and tools FY12 Medical Case Management RFR Responsive and flexible service provision Massachusetts State HIV/AIDS Plan Strengthen programmatic response 3

CURRENT USE Tool is currently being used by three SPECTRuM sites (SPNS project focused on linkage and retention for high acuity and newly diagnosed people living with HIV/AIDS) Boston Medical Center Greater New Bedford Community Health Center UMass Memorial Medical Center Tool will be used by Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program and East Boston Neighborhood Health Center linkage and retention program 4

MEETING OBJECTIVES Provide context for acuity system Review draft acuity tool Service areas Acuity levels Review how the tool is used Data sources for completing the tool Assignment of acuity scores Review evaluation components Client chart review Acuity summary forms Post pilot survey Pilot Specifics Six months 20 participants per agency Mix of high and low acuity 5

BENEFITS OF ACUITY BASED SYSTEM Supports efficient and targeted use of resources at the funder and agency levels Supports provision of services tailored to individual need Allows for placement of clients in appropriate service intensity level Offers multiple levels of engagement as clients level of need shifts 6

DEFINING SUCCESS AND ACHIEVEMENTS Using acuity to highlight fluid nature of a client s experiences with HIV/AIDS Acknowledging challenges with orienting and adapting to the service system (especially for the newly diagnosed) Complexity of care and challenges experienced by clients will change over time Creating a responsive service system Primary focus on attaining HIV medical self-management Creating ancillary/adjunct services that evolve over time to meet the needs of clients outside of the medical settings 7

COMPONENTS OF ACUITY SYSTEM MCM Assessment and Reassessment Acuity Tool (in review process) Individual Service Plan 8

PURPOSE OF ACUITY TOOL Determines client s level of need Objective when possible Consistent Helps triage clients to the appropriate level of medical case management Documents provider s knowledge of and experience with the client Provides funders with information about client need at the agency level, across the EMA, and throughout the Commonwealth 9

APPLYING ACUITY TO MCM SERVICES Higher acuity level/score More need for case management Requires more complex service coordination More case management & service coordination Documentation of met needs and services delivered Documentation of unmet/ongoing needs and how MCM will connect client to other services Evaluation and assessment of acuity and needs over time Updating service care plans and reassessments Determine how client can be moved along the continuum of HIV services 10

TOOL SPECIFICS MCM Levels Intensive need Moderate need Basic need Self management Areas of Functioning Care adherence Current health status Medication adherence Health literacy Sexual/reproductive health promotion Mental health Drug and alcohol use Housing Living situation/support systems Legal Income/personal finance Transportation Nutrition 11

DEFINING THE SERVICE AREAS Care Adherence: Missing medical appointments, MCM appointments, or other appointments with care team Current Health Status: Viral Load/CD4 labs Refusal of ARVs Opportunistic infections Hospitalizations New diagnosis Medication Adherence Missed doses Significant adverse side effects 12

DEFINING THE SERVICE AREAS Health Literacy HIV/HCV/STI knowledge Demonstrated understanding of transmission, treatments, and/or risk reduction Demonstrated understanding of how to take medication as prescribed and the importance of adherence Sexual/Reproductive Health Condom access and use Disclosure of status Engagement in transactional sex or commercial sex work Serodiscorant relationships HIV+ and pregnancy 13

DEFINING THE SERVICE AREAS Mental Health Clinical diagnosis Engagement with a mental health provider Adherence to prescribed psychotropic medications Specific scores on GAD-7 and PHQ-2 mental health screening tools* Alcohol and Drug Use Dependence on drugs and/or alcohol Effect of use on adherence and daily living Connection to or need for treatment Engagement in or desire for recovery Impact on HCV and other health issues Specific scores on CAGE-AID substance use screening tool* *Agencies do not need to use these screening tools, however if a qualified staff person administers the tools they may be taken into account when assessing a client s acuity 14

DEFINING THE SERVICE AREAS Housing Living in place not meant for habitation (street, car, etc) Living in shelter or doubled up Facing eviction Safety issues Difficulty managing activities of daily living Consistent challenges with maintaining housing (including financial) Currently or recently incarcerated Legal Facing eviction Issues related to discrimination (employment, housing, etc) Standard legal documents (wills, guardianship, immigration paperwork, etc.) 15

DEFINING THE SERVICE AREAS Living Situation/Support Systems Current or past interpersonal relationship violence Inadequate support systems Disclosure of HIV status Income/Personal Finance Management Financial stability Ability to complete applications Has or needs a representative payee Transportation Lacks access to transportation for medical and other necessary appointments Ability to coordinate/access transportation Nutrition Access to food Medical necessity 16

GATHERING INFORMATION To complete the tool information may be gathered from: Client s medical record Client s internal service file Conversations with client External social service or clinical provider documents (with signed and updated releases) Comprehensive assessment Lab data In most cases the client does not have to be present when the tool is completed 17

USING THE TOOL Based on information gathered from the previously listed sources check the boxes for all applicable criteria in each area of functioning and enter the number that corresponds to the level of need in the left column Area of Functioning Intensive Need (3) Moderate Need (2) Basic Need (1) Self Management (0) Current Health Status Acuity level: Has detectable VL and CD4 below 200 and refuses ARVs Has current OI and is not being treated or refuses treatment Has been hospitalized in last 30 days Newly diagnosed within last six months and concurrently diagnosed with AIDS Has detectable VL and low CD4 below 350 and refuses ARVs Has history of OI in last six months which are treated and client using prophylaxis (if indicated) Has been hospitalized in last six months Newly diagnosed within last six months; high CD4 (over 350) Has detectable VL but is on ARVs Has no history of OIs in last six months or is on treatment for an OI Has had no hospitalizations in last six months Is virally suppressed Has no history of OIs in last 12 months Has no history of hospitalizations in last 12 months 18

USING THE TOOL Clients who meet criteria in two or more levels of need for any area of functioning are automatically assigned the number corresponding to the highest level of need. Area of Functioning Intensive Need (3) Moderate Need (2) Basic Need (1) Self Management (0) Current Health Status Acuity level: 3 Has detectable VL and CD4 below 200 and refuses ARVs Has current OI and is not being treated or refuses treatment Has been hospitalized in last 30 days Newly diagnosed within last six months and concurrently diagnosed with AIDS Has detectable VL and low CD4 below 350 and refuses ARVs Has history of OI in last six months which are treated and client using prophylaxis (if indicated) Has been hospitalized in last six months Newly diagnosed within last six months; high CD4 (over 350) Has detectable VL but is on ARVs Has no history of OIs in last six months or is on treatment for an OI Has had no hospitalizations in last six months Is virally suppressed Has no history of OIs in last 12 months Has no history of hospitalizations in last 12 months 19

USING THE TOOL Checked boxes should not be added up within an area of functioning Area of Functioning Intensive Need (3) Moderate Need (2) Basic Need (1) Self Management (0) Current Health Status Acuity level: 3 Has detectable VL and CD4 below 200 and refuses ARVs Has current OI and is not being treated or refuses treatment Has been hospitalized in last 30 days Newly diagnosed within last six months and concurrently diagnosed with AIDS Has detectable VL and low CD4 below 350 and refuses ARVs Has history of OI in last six months which are treated and client using prophylaxis (if indicated) Has been hospitalized in last six months Newly diagnosed within last six months; high CD4 (over 350) Has detectable VL but is on ARVs Has no history of OIs in last six months or is on treatment for an OI Has had no hospitalizations in last six months Is virally suppressed Has no history of OIs in last 12 months Has no history of hospitalizations in last 12 months 20

ASSIGNING THE MEDICAL CASE MANAGEMENT LEVEL Total acuity score is determined by adding up the numbers from each area of functioning Total Score MCM Level Required level of interaction 27-39 Intensive MCM Minimum monthly face to face acuity assessment Minimum service reassessment and ISP every 3 months Minimum weekly contact 14-26 Moderate MCM Minimum face to face acuity assessment every 3 months Minimum service reassessment and ISP every 3 months Minimum monthly contact 1-13 Basic MCM Minimum acuity assessment twice per year Minimum service reassessment and ISP every 6 months Minimum contact every 6 months 0 Self Management No required level of interaction 21

THE PILOT Pilot will run from November 1, 2014 to April 30, 2015 Agency participation is not mandatory, however the pilot process is the mechanism to give feedback and input to the funders At the end of the pilot BPHC and OHA will implement an acuity index which agencies will be expected to use You re the experts! We want a tool that works for you 22

PILOT PARTICIPANTS Agencies must enroll a minimum of 20 clients No more than ten clients who appear to be high need At least five clients who appear to be low need If possible agencies should enroll between one and five clients who are either newly diagnosed or new to the agency Care team members should discuss the pilot and identify appropriate participants as soon as possible 23

PILOT PARTICIPANTS Agencies with a client population less than 50 will negotiate an appropriate number of pilot participants with their program coordinator/contract manager Agencies that enroll more than 20 must enroll 20 meeting the previously listed criteria, and may use any criteria they choose for selecting the additional clients Agencies will explain selection process in a post-pilot survey 24

TIMELINE FOR USING THE TOOL Pilot participants who are newly diagnosed or new to the clinic should have their acuity assessed as soon as possible to determine the MCM level Pilot participants who are existing agency clients should have an initial acuity assessment the next time they meet with MCM staff (by November 20, 2014 at the latest) Acuity tool should be administered at least twice during the course of the six month pilot 25

TABLE TALK 26

LUNCH! 27

EVALUATION COMPONENTS For each pilot client, agencies must complete the Acuity Summary Sheet to be maintained in a paper file During the six months from November 2014 to May 2015 BPHC and OHA staff will add a pilot check -in agenda item to the monthly call From April June 2015 BPHC and OHA staff (or their designees) will review all pilot participant charts using the Acuity Tool Client File Review form At the end of the pilot a survey will be sent to all participating agencies 28

FUNDER CHART REVIEW During the six month pilot all participants must have paper charts available for funder review with all appropriate documents maintained (including ISP and assessment tools) Paper charts do not need to include non-service specific documents (e.g. grievance form, client responsibilities, etc) Your contract manager or program coordinator will give you specifics The chart review will include a review and comparison of the acuity tool, the ISP, the reassessment, and case notes 29

ACUIT Y SUMMARY SHEET At-a-glance document to be included in every pilot participant s file Notes section Can be used for 2 different acuity assessments Can be handwritten Template & completed sample is included in your packet 30

GIVING INPUT AND FEEDBACK: ACCURACY OF THE TOOL In addition to the acuity level for each area of functioning, each Acuity Summary sheet has the following questions: What criteria did not accurately reflect your understanding of the client s need? How would you change or edit existing criteria or what additional criteria would you add to better reflect the client s need? 31

GIVING INPUT AND FEEDBACK: IMPLEMENTATION The post-pilot survey will include questions about the ease of use of the tool, suggestions for change, areas for improvement, etc. Agencies are encouraged to contact their program coordinator or contract manager with any questions or concerns that come up during the six months At the end of the six months agencies will be asked to submit copies of each pilot participant s acuity tool and acuity summary sheets 32

ACUIT Y TOOL PRACTICE Read the case studies Complete the acuity tool using the information given Discuss with others at your table 33

CONTACT INFORMATION Contact your program coordinator or contract manager by Friday October 24 th to confirm your participation in the pilot Contact your program coordinator or contract manager with any questions 34

NEXT STEPS Meet with your care team to review the tool, explain the pilot, and identify pilot participants BPHC and MDPH will develop and distribute an FAQ Start using the tool! 35