DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2019 PRESIDENT S BUDGET

Similar documents
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2016 PRESIDENT S BUDGET

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2016 PRESIDENT S BUDGET. Rear Admiral William K. Lescher, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2017 PRESIDENT S BUDGET

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2014 PRESIDENT S BUDGET. Rear Admiral Joseph P. Mulloy, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget

Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017

MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

Vice Admiral Mark Skinner, USN Principal Military Deputy, Asst. Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development & Acquisition

A Ready, Modern Force!

MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018

NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference

Challenges and opportunities Trends to address New concepts for: Capability and program implications Text

FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2019 BUDGET ESTIMATES

Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157)

CNO s. Navigation Plan WARFIGHTING FIRST

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL WILLIAM F. MORAN U.S. NAVY VICE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATE OF THE MILITARY

Current Estimate (TY$ in Millions) December 2015 (79 programs) $ 1,644,420.5

CRS Report for Congress

529 AAG Advanced Arresting Gear MDAP Navy ID 472 ACV 1.1 Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase 1 MDAP Navy IC

I n d e x o f P r o g r a m s

Industry Day RDML Mat Winter Commander, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division. 23 May 2012

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4

202 AH-64E Remanufacture AH-64E Apache Remanufacture MDAP Army IC

H. R. ll [Report No. 115 ll]

Current Estimate (TY$ in Millions) December 2016 (87 programs) $ 1,748,659

STATEMENT ADMIRAL JOHN M. RICHARDSON CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

FFG(X) Update National Symposium - Surface Navy Association

BUDGET BRIEF Senator McCain and Outlining the FY18 Defense Budget

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 BUDGET ESTIMATES

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: RDT&E Ship & Aircraft Support

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910

Navy Affairs Committee Minutes BOD Meeting - 23 May 2008

Gun and Missile Systems An Integrated Warfare Perspective

April 25, Dear Mr. Chairman:

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018

FIGURE 6-1: PB18 PROCUREMENT REQUEST, AS COMPARED TO PB17 AND FY17 APPROPRIATIONS

NAVAIR Overview. 30 November 2016 NAVAIR. PRESENTED TO: Radford University. PRESENTED BY: David DeMauro / John Ross

CRS Report for Congress

DIVISION A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I PROCUREMENT

Amphibious Landings in the 21 st Century

DEPARTMENT OF "rhe NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

Recapitalizing the Navy s Battle-Line

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #152

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

Air-Sea Battle: Concept and Implementation

OPNAVINST L N96 30 Mar Subj: REQUIREMENTS FOR AIR CAPABLE AND AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIPS TO OPERATE AIRCRAFT

SAF/FMB FEBRUARY 2018 UNITED STATES AIR FORCE FISCAL YEAR 2019 BUDGET OVERVIEW

CD&I and CDD Organization Expeditionary Force 21 MEB CONOPS Combat and Tactical Vehicle Strategy & ACV Video Seabasing and Non-Standard Platforms

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2017 BUDGET ESTIMATES BUDGET DATA BOOK OFFICE OF BUDGET

5750 Ser 00/ SEX) 00. From: Commanding Officer, Strike Fighter Squadron 25 To: Director of Naval History (N09BH)

Navy-Marine Corps Strike-Fighter Shortfall: Background and Options for Congress

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9

Highlights of the Department of the Navy FY 2013 Budget Table of Contents

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002

Logbook Navy Perspective on Joint Force Interdependence Navigating Rough Seas Forging a Global Network of Navies

WikiLeaks Document Release

Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress

FY19 President s Budget Request

The World Military Market for Connectors

Navy Information Warfare Pavilion 19 February RADM Matthew Kohler, Naval Information Forces

Prepared Remarks for the Honorable Richard V. Spencer Secretary of the Navy Defense Science Board Arlington, VA 01 November 2017

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY AND GENERAL MARK A. MILLEY CHIEF OF STAFF UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE

Trusted Partner in guided weapons

NAVAL AVIATION MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SYMPOSIUM VADM DAVID ARCHITZEL. 29 June 2011 COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND. Presented to: Presented by:

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE M / (U)Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar (G/ATOR) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

INTRODUCTION. Before I address our current budget submission, I would like to review some of the events and highlights of the past year.

In Brief: Highlights of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act

Overview. Vision Guiding Principles Across the FYDP FY15 President s Budget (PB) Request FY15 Opportunity, Growth and Security Initiatives

Navy Aegis Cruiser and Destroyer Modernization: Background and Issues for Congress

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES MAY 2017 RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS

Logbook Adm. Greenert and Gen. Amos: A New Naval Era Adm. Greenert and Gen. Welsh: Breaking the Kill Chain

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

POSTURE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

Virginia Ship Repair Association Commonality and Flexibility in Combat Systems

DEFENSE BUDGET PRIORITIES AND CHOICES FISCAL YEAR 2014

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: ASW Systems Development

Assessing Technologies using Campaign Analysis and War Gaming: The Warfare Innovation Continuum at NPS

U. S. Navy Road Ahead Brief to: Precision Strike Association 21 January 2004

Current Army Operational Support

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, 2006 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9

Ready to Profit: Corporate Beneficiaries of Congressional Add-Ons to 1. the FY 2018 Pentagon Budget

Operation and Maintenance

We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan

Littoral OpTech West Workshop

TODAY S NAVY UNCLASSIFIED 1

March 23, Sincerely, Peter R. Orszag. Honorable Roscoe G. Bartlett, Ranking Member, Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2019 PRESIDENT S BUDGET February 12, 2018

Agenda Strategic Guidance Operational Context Fiscal Context Balanced Choices Reform 1 1

The Foundation Strategic Guidance National Security; Defense; and Military Strategies Compete, Deter, Win 2 2

Strategic Environment Increasing Complex Security Environment 3 3

Operational Context JOHN C STENNIS (CVN) Russia 52 Ships 176 Ships 17 Ships Ukraine Syria THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CSG) Iran Taliban China RONALD REAGAN (CSG) North Korea GERALD R FORD (CVN) Libya ISIL BONHOMME RICHARD (ESG) WASP (ESG) 6 Ships AQAP 24 Ships CARL VINSON (CVN) AMERICA (ARG) Marine Corps Navy Choke Point Hot Spot BATTLE FORCE SHIPS: 280 40 Ships Deployed U/W (14%) 29 Ships Non-Deployed U/W (10%) 69 Total Ships U/W (25%) Personnel Forward Deployed Average Ship Count Navy: 77,825 Today / FY19/ FY23 Marines: 35,200 Total: 280 / 299 / 326 Deployed: 100 / 100 / 131 Office of Budget 4

Operational Environment 5

Budget Environment - Eroding Military Advantage TY $ B FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 OCO Funding 16.4 11.5 14.2 10.3 9.4 14.4 8.6 15.0 210.0 205.0 200.0 195.0 "Failure to modernize our military risks leaving us with a force that could dominate the last war, but be irrelevant to tomorrow's security. Let me be clear: As hard as the last 16 years have been on our military, no enemy in the field has done more to harm the readiness of the U.S. military than the combined impact of the Budget Control Act's defense spending cuts, worsened by us operating, 9 of the last 10 years, under continuing resolutions, wasting copious amounts of precious taxpayer dollars." - SECDEF Mattis 190.0 185.0 186.8 180.0 175.0 170.0 165.0 161.4 165.4 160.0 155.0 150.0 145.0 158.7 155.1 Strategy / Budget aligned 152.0 149.7 168.9 173.0 149.3 149.4 175.9 160.9 Enacted 149.8 148.0 148.1 159.7 152.0 140.0 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 171.5 156.3 174.7 160.6 BCA 177.1 164 182.4 168 Need for Stable and Predictable Funding PB18 Current FY18 Estimate: PB18 original request = $171.5B FY18 Adjusted Budget = $172.8B: +$25M OCO; +733.5M FTZ and JSM; +$525.5M Hurricane Anticipate at least $175B (lesser of HAC/SAC mark) FY18 Annualized CR $169.4B Office of Budget 6

Budget Environment Building the Lethal Force TY $ B FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 OCO Funding 16.4 11.5 14.2 10.3 9.4 14.4 8.6 15.0 210.0 205.0 200.0 199.8 204.7 195.0 190.0 Great Power Competition 194.5 PB19 185.0 188.9 180.0 175.0 170.0 165.0 161.4 165.4 160.0 155.0 150.0 145.0 158.7 155.1 Defeat Deny 152.0 149.7 168.9 173.0 149.3 149.4 175.9 160.9 149.8 148.0 148.1 Enacted 159.7 152.0 140.0 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 171.5 156.3 179.1 160.6 BCA 164 168 Long Term Strategic Competition Current FY18 Estimate: PB18 original request = $171.5B FY18 Adjusted Budget = $172.8B: +$25M OCO; +733.5M FTZ and JSM; +$525.5M Hurricane Anticipate at least $175B (lesser of HAC/SAC mark) FY18 Annualized CR $169.4B Office of Budget 7

Summary by Appropriation Group FY 2019 DON Base + OCO Budget O&M: $63.4B ($49.9B Base/ $13.5B OCO) Ship Ops & Maint $18.3 Aviation Ops & Maint $11.4 Base Ops & Support $7.7 Marine Corps O&M $8.2 Combat/Weapons Support $8.7 Service Wide Support $4.2 Training and Education $2.0 Reserve O&M $1.1 Environmental Restoration $0.3 Mobilization $1.3 Navy: 33% Marine Corps: 28% MilPers: $50.2B ($49.7B Base/$0.5B OCO) Basic Pays $20.9 Housing Allowance $8.2 Retired Pay Accrual $6.3 Health Accrual $2.5 Reserve Personnel $2.8 Subsistence $2.3 Allowances $1.1 Special Pays $1.6 Other $3.7 FY19: $194.1B 33% 30% DON 26% 9% 2% Infrastructure: $3.4B ($3.2B Base/$0.2B OCO) MILCON $2.8 BRAC $0.2 Family Housing $0.4 Procurement: $58.5B ($57.9B Base/$0.6B OCO) Ships $21.9 Aircraft $19.1 Weapons $3.7 Marine Corps $2.9 Ammunition $1.3 Other Navy Procurement $9.6 Navy: 34% Marine Corps: 11% R&D: $18.6B ($18.4B Base/ $0.2B OCO) Basic Research $0.6 Applied Research $0.9 Advance Tech Dev $0.8 Adv Component Dev $4.3 System Dev & Demo $6.0 Management Support $1.0 Ops Systems Dev $5.0 Navy: 21% Marine Corps: 54% Navy: 1% Marine Corps: 3% Navy: 11% Marine Corps: 3% = The percentage of each Service s total budget applied to each appropriation group Numbers may not add due to rounding Office of Budget 8

Active and Reserve Personnel Strength Military Personnel - Navy o o Transitioning from a declining to a growing force while facing an improved economy and increased competition for talent o o o Substantially increases accessions to meet growth/shipbuilding plan Includes Enablers (Recruiters, bonuses, incentives) Funds manpower Total Ownership Cost end strength to eliminate gaps at sea MPN includes manpower for: 350,000 344,800 345,000 340,500 340,000 335,400 335,000 330,000 323,944 327,900 325,000 320,000 327,900 315,000 310,000 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 MPN Actual PB18 PB19 o CR/SRR manning & training impacts o o 4 CG crews returning to operational status following completion of Phase Modernization Special Operations Forces growth 60,000 59,000 58,000 57,824 59,000 59,000 59,100 59,200 o RPN includes manpower for increased support of Fleet operational requirements 57,000 56,000 55,000 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 RPN Actual PB18 PB19 9 9

Military Personnel Marine Corps Supports an Active Component Force of 186.1K and Reserve Component Force of 38.5K Maintains a 1:2 Deployment-to-Dwell Force in the aggregate Forward deployed providing support to Combatant Commanders with ready, relevant crisis response forces and building capacity with partners and allies Tailored Marine Air Ground Task Forces (MAGTF) to meet mission requirements across the range of military operations Active Personnel Strength Reserve Personnel Strength 187,000 186,000 185,000 185,000 184,514 185,000 186,100 186,400 186,400 42,000 41,000 40,000 39,000 38,682 38,500 38,500 38,500 184,000 38,000 37,000 38,500 183,000 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 36,000 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 Actual PB18 PB19 Actual PB18 PB19 MPMC RPMC 10 10

FTE FY 2017 206,227 250,000 200,000 150,000 FY 2018 209,008 20,469 21,108 21,553 Civilian Personnel FY 2019 212,195 Improve Readiness and Build a More Lethal Force Highlights in FY 2019: Warfare Centers: Additional personnel to support increased air, surface, and undersea capabilities Ship Maintenance: Additional personnel to support additional ships including new construction, maintenance backlogs, and CG extensions 100,000 50,000-185,758 187,900 190,642 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Marine Corps Navy Security: Additional personnel to address security and incident response at installations Intelligence: Additional personnel to address increased terrorist and counter-intelligence threats worldwide Fleet Combat Support: Additional personnel for expanded operations in the Pacific Cyber: Additional personnel to accelerate and enhance offensive and defensive cyberspace operations Total Department of the Navy 206,227 209,008 212,195 FTE By Appropriation/Fund Operation and Maintenance 117,816 121,835 123,373 Working Capital Funds 87,010 85,332 86,983 Other (FHOPS/RDTEN/BRC) 1,401 1,841 1,839 Weapons Systems: Additional personnel for logistics support for fielding additional weapons and platforms 11 8 11

Ship Readiness Ship Depot Maintenance Max Executable Ship Operations 58 days/qtr deployed 24 days/qtr non-deployed $12.0 $12.0 $10.0 $0.7B $10.0 $8.0 $8.0 $6.0 $6.0 $4.0 $8.8B $9.6B $9.8B $4.0 $2.0 $2.0 $4.8B $4.9B $5.3B $- FY17 FY18 FY19 $- FY17 FY18 FY19 FY17 Actuals FY18 Initial PB 18 Request PB19 Base + OCO 12 12

Aviation Readiness Aircraft Depot Maintenance Max Executable Flying Hour Operations Deployed T-Rating Navy 2.0 / Marine Corps 2.0 $10.0 $10.0 $8.0 $8.0 $6.0 $6.0 $4.0 $4.0 $7.5B $8.6B $8.4B $2.0 $2.0 $1.2B $1.4B $1.6B $- FY17 FY18 FY19 $- FY17 FY18 FY19 FY17 Actuals FY18 Initial PB 18 Request PB19 Base + OCO 13 13

Shore Readiness Facilities Support Navy 80% of facility sustainment model Facilities Support USMC 80% of facility sustainment model 7.0 6.0 $6.7B $7.0B $6.9B 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.4 7.0 6.0 1.3 1.6 1.7 5.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 4.8 4.7 4.7 Hurricane RM & Demo ST BOS 4.0 3.0 2.0 $3.2B $3.1B $3.2B 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 RM & Demo ST BOS 1.0 1.0 2.4 2.3 2.3 0.0 FY17 FY18 FY19 0.0 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 70% 78% 80% 70% 75% 80% FY17 Actuals FY18 Initial PB 18 Request PB19 Base + OCO Navy Marine Corps 14 14

($B) Marine Corps Readiness Marine Corps Ground Equip 82% of projected maintenance funded Marine Corps Readiness Operating Forces $0.4 $3.5 $3.0 $0.3 $2.5 $2.0 $0.2 $0.3B $0.3B $0.3B $1.5 $2.7B $3.0B $2.9B $0.1 $1.0 $0.5 $0.0 FY17 FY18 FY19 $0.0 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY17 Actuals FY18 Initial PB 18 Request PB19 Base + OCO 15 15

Shipbuilding and Conversion Ship Class FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 19-23 Columbia-class Submarine AP AP AP 1 - - 1 CVN 78 1 - - - - 1 1 SSN 774 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 DDG 51 2 3 2 3 3 3 14 LCS 2 1 - - - - 1 FFG(X) - - 1 1 2 2 6 LHA(R) - - - - - - - LPD 17 - - - - - - - LX(R) - - 1-1 1 3 Expeditionary Sea Base (ESB) - 1 1 - - - 2 Expeditionary Fast Transport (EPF) - - - - - - - T-AO 205 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 T-ATS 1 1 2 1 1 1 6 T-AGOS(X) - - - - 1 1 2 Battle Force Total QTY 9 10 10 10 11 13 54 LCAC SLEP - 1 - - - - 1 Ship to Shore Connector 3 5 8 8 8 8 37 LCU 1700 1 2 4 4 4 4 18 Moored Training Ship - - - - - - - CVN RCOH - - - 1 - - 1 Other Total QTY 4 8 12 13 12 12 57 DDG ESB Total Shipbuilding QTY 13 18 22 23 23 25 111 The FY 2018 column in this table represents FY18 @ PB 2018 amended submission incorporating additional LCS with OMB errata changes. T-AO SSN 16 16

Aircraft Procurement Fixed Wing FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY19-23 F-35C (CV) 4 9 16 24 24 24 97 F-35B (STOVL) 20 20 20 20 20 21 101 FA-18E/F 14 24 24 24 21 17 110 E-2D AHE 5 4 4 4 5 7 24 P-8A (MMA) 7 10 9 - - - 19 UC-12W (USMC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C-40A (USMC) - 2 - - - - 2 T-44 Replacement (NAVY) - - - - - 10 10 KC-130J 2 2 2 5 6 8 23 Rotary Wing CH-53K (HLR) 4 8 9 14 19 19 69 MV-22B / CMV-22B 6 7 10 9 11 15 52 AH-1Z 22 25 - - - - 25 TH-57 Replacement (NAVY) - - 25 25 25 10 85 VH-92A - 6 6 5 - - 17 UAV MQ-4 Triton 3 3 3 3 3 5 17 MQ-8C (VTUAV) (NAVY) - - - - - - - MQ-25 Stingray (NAVY) - - - - - 4 4 RQ-21 (USMC) 4 - - - - - - TOTAL 91 120 128 133 134 140 655 MV-22B P-8A AH-1Z F-35 C 17 17

Weapons Procurement MK 48 AGM Ship Weapons FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY 19-23 TACTOM 100 - - - - - - TACTOM Mod 87 112 156 156 348 274 1,046 SM6 125 125 125 125 125 125 625 RAM Blk II 60 120 150 155 270 270 965 ESSM Blk II 31 45 60 125 175 300 705 MK 48 HWT 17 45 58 71 75 76 325 MK 48 CBA SS KITS 79 79 46 30 42-197 MK 54 LWT MOD 0 114 66 70 - - - 136 MK 54 LWT MOD 1 30 30 30 82 122 138 402 ADVANCED LWT - - - - 6 54 60 HARPOON Blk II+ MODS 54 52 35 37 20 20 164 LCS OTH - 8 12 12 12 20 64 LCS SSMM 110 90 120 115 109 109 543 SOPGM 19 31 - - - - 31 Aircraft Weapons SIDEWINDER AIM-9X* 185 192 198 200 192 192 974 AMRAAM* 120 141 222 316 347 358 1,384 AARGM BLK I 251 257 243 242 247 268 1,257 AARGM BLK II 0 0 0 16 16 16 48 JAGM - 75 75 192 192 304 838 LRASM 25 25 25 25 - - 75 HELLFIRE* 110 23 - - - - 23 Laser Maverick 64 - - - - - - SDB II 90 750 750 750 750 750 3,750 *OCO Request included in PB19 RAM 18 18

Other Procurement Other Procurment, Navy Quantity FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY19-23 SEWIP BLK 2 10 16 19 17 8 2 62 CANES SEWIP BLK 3 2 4 8 11 7 7 37 SSEE INC F 6 5 5 0 0 0 10 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) 66 248 102 35 0 0 385 VARIOUS COMMUNICATION ENHANCEMENTS 112 178 183 140 84 50 635 TACTICAL CRYPTO SYSTEMS (TCS) 6 8 6 7 0 0 21 PARAGON GRAYWING 8 9 10 9 10 10 48 CANES AFLOAT 24 20 17 20 11 9 77 NMT SEWIP DDG Modernization 7 5 7 7 8 8 35 SSN/SSGN/SSBN SWFTS Sets 13 10 13 14 13 14 64 LCS Mission Modules 2 4 4 4 3 3 18 SWFTS SLQ-32(V)7 SEWIP Block 3 SEWIP Block 2 19 19

$B $B Other Warfighting Accounts 3.0 2.0 1.0 $1.4B $1.0B 0.4 0.2 0.8 1.0 $1.9B 0.6 1.3 Weapons, Vehicles & Other Communications and Electronics Equipment PMC Capability Enhancements Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar (G/ATOR) Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) 0.0 PMC FY17 FY18 FY19 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 PANMC $1.2B $1.0B $0.8B 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.3 FY17 FY18 FY19 Navy Marine Corps PANMC Capability Enhancements Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) 20 Numbers may not add due to rounding - includes OCO 20

$ (B) Accelerate Future Capability (R&D) 18.0 15.0 12.0 14.3 14.6 15.2 9.0 6.0 3.0 1.3 0.9 1.0 2.3 2.2 2.2 0.0 FY17 FY18 FY19 S&T Management Development RDTEN $18.5B $17.8B $17.7B Major Systems ($M) FY17 FY18 FY19 Shipbuilding Columbia class 1,071 1,042 705 Virginia class 220 190 146 Carrier Replacement 238 309 292 Frigate 83 143 135 Aviation & Weapons Joint Strike Fighter (F-35) 1,087 551 644 Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) 578 700 575 Executive Helo Development 328 452 245 LRASM 302 161 143 F/A-18 Infrared Search and Tracking (IRST) 94 87 109 Advanced Hawkeye 354 293 224 Tomahawk 49 134 282 Unmanned MQ-4C Triton 258 314 234 MQ-25 76 222 719 Advanced Undersea Prototyping 57 67 88 USMC Amphibious Combat Vehicle 131 179 98 G/ATOR 79 55 45 Ground Based Air Defense (GBAD) 45 24 74 Other Navy Laser Family of Systems (NLFoS) 120 152 299 Digital Warfare 2 15 27 Rapid Prototyping 2 41 21 49 Numbers may not add due to rounding 21

$B Military Construction & Family Housing 3.0 $2.8B FY19 MILCON Projects Major Categories $ in Millions # of Projects New Platform/Mission Support 931 19 Restore Warfighting Readiness 612 8 European Deterrence Initiative 215 5 Guam (DPRI) 243 4 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 $1.5B 0.6 0.9 $1.9B 0.8 1.1 0.9 1.9 FY17 FY18 FY19 Naval Shipyards 221 4 MILCON Navy Marine Corps Safety, Security, Environmental 152 4 Replace Aging Infrastructure 169 3 Navy and Marine Corps Reserves 36 2 Planning and Design 203 N/A Unspecified Minor Construction 32 N/A 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 $0.4B $0.4B $.0.4B 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 FY17 FY18 FY19 FAMILY HOUSING OPS CON 22 22

Reform We have a responsibility to gain full value from every taxpayer dollar spent on defense, thereby earning the trust of Congress and the American people. National Defense Strategy OMB issued guidance on a Comprehensive Plan for Reforming the Federal Government and Reducing the Federal Civilian Workforce. Reform efforts should focus on improving organizational effectiveness; eliminating, restructuring, or merging activities; and workforce management. In development of the FY 2019 President s Budget the DON will review business operational processes and programs to achieve reform. 23 23

Audit The Department will continue its plan to achieve full auditability of all its operations, improving its financial processes, systems, and tools to understand, manage, and improve cost. National Defense Strategy The Department of the Navy is undergoing its first audit of all financial statements. The audit is an independent assessment of the efficiency and effectiveness of Navy and Marine Corps operational processes and internal controls. The audit will identify areas where operational process deficiencies are contributing to readiness gaps. Corrective actions will be led by senior executives and flag officers, and will be monitored by the Under Secretary, Vice Chief of Naval Operations, and Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps. Annual audits will provide an independent assessment of the progress of the corrective actions that Navy and Marine Corps is taking. The DON is committed to being accountable stewards of every dollar entrusted to us. 24 24

25

For more Information Fully searchable justification material available at: http://www.secnav.navy.mil/fmc/fmb/pages/fiscal-year-2019.aspx 26 26