CJCSI B Requirements Generation System (One Year Later)

Similar documents
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Embedded Training Solution for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) A3

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Capability Integration

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

JCIDS: The New Language of Defense Planning, Programming and Acquisition

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

NUMBER Department of Defense INSTRUCTION ASD(C3I)

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TRAINING TRANSFORMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Digitization... A Warfighter s Perspective

JCIDS Overview. Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System. Joint Staff, J-8 Capabilities and Acquisition Division UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Chemical Weapons Improved Response Program

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

DoD CBRN Defense Doctrine, Training, Leadership, and Education (DTL&E) Strategic Plan

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Dr. Mohamed Mughal. Homeland Defense Business Unit U.S. Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command Department of Defense

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4

US Joint Forces Command Approach to Interoperability and Integration

ACQUISITION OF THE ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM. Report No. D February 28, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

TRADOC REGULATION 25-31, ARMYWIDE DOCTRINAL AND TRAINING LITERATURE PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 30 MARCH 1990

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Information Technology

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

NG-J6/CIO CNGBI A DISTRIBUTION: A 26 September 2016 NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU JOINT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

This is definitely another document that needs to have lots of HSI language in it!

at the Missile Defense Agency

U.S. Army Command and Control Support Agency

IMPROVED INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS PERFORMANCE OF AN HE ROCKET WARHEAD

Test and Evaluation and the ABCs: It s All about Speed

Capability Planning for Today and Tomorrow Installation Status Report

A udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

The Joint Service Small Arms Program (JSSAP)

Conducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment

Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability

The 2008 Modeling and Simulation Corporate and Crosscutting Business Plan

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

JOINT U.S. AND CANADIAN DEVELOPMENT OF TESTING PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATION OF PERSONAL BODY ARMOR PERFORMANCE AGAINST AUTOMATIC WEAPONS

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

MANDATORY PROCEDURES FOR MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS (MDAPS) AND MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM (MAIS) ACQUISITION PROGRAMS

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems

The National Guard Marksmanship Training Center

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Joint Interoperability Certification

Center for National Response

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

US ARMY CENTER OF MILITARY HISTORY

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

DoD Modeling and Simulation Policy Update The Defense Modeling and Simulation Office

Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WASHINGTON, DC. 2031O. DASG-HS 26 March Expires 21 March 2003

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Information Technology

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

Lessons learned process ensures future operations build on successes

UNITED STATES ARMY DRUG AND ALCOHOL TECHNICAL ACTIVITY

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

An Introduction to Wargaming

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

The Military Health System

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

February 2009 Updated 31 July 2009 MANUAL FOR THE OPERATION OF THE JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM

Chemical Agent Monitor Simulator (CAMSIM)

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction, issued under the authority of DoD Directive (DoDD) 5144.

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Transcription:

CJCSI 3170.01B Requirements Generation System (One Year Later) Colonel Michael T. Perrin Chief, Requirements and Acquisition Division, J-8 The Joint Staff 1

Report Documentation Page Report Date 15052001 Report Type N/A Dates Covered (from... to) - Title and Subtitle CJCSI 3170.01B Requirements Generation System (One Year Later) Contract Number Grant Number Program Element Number Author(s) Perrin, Michael T. Project Number Task Number Work Unit Number Performing Organization Name(s) and Address(es) The Joint Staff Sponsoring/Monitoring Agency Name(s) and Address(es) NDIA (National Defense Industrial Association 2111 Wilson Blvd., Ste. 400 Arlington, VA 22201-3061 Performing Organization Report Number Sponsor/Monitor s Acronym(s) Sponsor/Monitor s Report Number(s) Distribution/Availability Statement Approved for public release, distribution unlimited Supplementary Notes Proceedings from 3rd Simulation Based Acquisition conference, 15-17 May 2001, sponsored by NDIA, The original document contains color images. Abstract Subject Terms Report Classification unclassified Classification of Abstract unclassified Classification of this page unclassified Limitation of Abstract UU Number of Pages 20

Agenda Introduction CJCS 3170 Changes Role of M&S Summary Questions 2

Joint Vision 2020 Technological Innovation Precision Engagement Dominant Maneuver Focused Logistics Full-Dimensional Protection Information Superiority Doctrine Organizations Training Material Leadership People Facilities Full Spectrum Dominance Up-front planning must provide the framework for identifying future operational capabilities! Peacetime Engagement Deterrence & Conflict Prevention Fight & Win

Requirements Generation Process Survey Future Joint Warfare Environment Validate & Approve Required Capabilities Validate & Approve Requirements Mission Area Assessment Mission Need Analysis Mission Need Statement Concept Exploration Operational Requirements Document Articulate Potential Needs Describe Required Capabilities (No Specified Materiel Solutions) Explore How to Achieve Capabilities KPPs & Other Requirements (Materiel Solutions) 4

CJCSI 3170.01A SWARF Automated Information Systems JFCOM Role Interoperability CRD/ORD KPP Affordability Time Phased Requirements Information Exchange Requirements CRD Development & Lead Responsibilities 5

Interoperability: JFCOM Role JFCOM will serve as the Chairman's advocate for joint warfighting interoperability. JFCOM Coordinates with the Joint Staff J6, ASD(C3I) and the CINCs in development of the C4ISR Joint Operational Architecture (JOA). Provides comments on unresolved Interoperability issues at the JROC. Is available to comment on interoperability issues that are forwarded to the DAB by the JROC. Coordinates on all C4ISPs (contains IA areas) Is Lead for Joint Experimentation 6

Enforcing Interoperability Capstone Requirements Document Establishes the Information Exchange and Interoperability requirements for the Family of Systems. Leads to the development of the Mission Area architectures CINC Lead ORD ORD ORD ORD ORDs comply with CRD Interoperability KPP as price of membership into the Family of Systems Service Lead 7

CRD Development and Lead Responsibilities CRD development approved by JROC CRD contains Interoperability KPP CRD lead will - Accompanies all ORDs falling under the CRD through the JROC and acquisition milestone reviews - Ensures the ORDs KPPs map to the CRD 8

Information Exchange Requirements (IERs) Definition: Requirements for information to be passed between and among Joint forces, organizations, or administrative structures. (DOD C4ISR Architecture Framework Version 2.O) Identifies: WHO exchanges WHAT information with WHOM WHY the information is necessary HOW the information is used ATTRIBUTES (READ METRICS) to further define the requirement and add levels of detail necessary to support the warfighter 9

Time-Phased Requirements Supports Evolutionary Acquisition Fields system in increasing increments of capability as defined by: Warfighter needs Evolving threat Available technology Affordability 10

Time-Phased Requirements (Guidelines) JROC approved KPP s must be achieved in the specified increment If increments are not defined in the ORD, all KPP thresholds must be met in the first increment Delegated ORD approval authorities may approve block ORD s if no KPP s are involved Each Increment must have standalone military utility Must be acceptable to the user even if no further increments are funded (per Clinger-Cohen) 11

Time-Phased Requirements (Strategies) New ORD for each block Suitable for slowly developing programs Multiple-Block ORD Define multiple blocks in the same ORD - captures old P3I ORD Update for each block Rapid turnaround update---staff changes only 12

Addressing Cost in ORD Cost will be addressed in the ORD Inclusion of cost allows DoD component sponsor to emphasize affordability early in the proposed program Cost figure should be stated in terms of a threshold and Objective (not necessarily a KPP) The cost figure should provide flexibility to allow for program evolution and CAIV trade studies DoD component sponsor may make cost a KPP if it desires and identify the cost it wishes to evaluate 13

CJCSI 3170.01B (Interim) Changes DOTMLPF Jointness Environmental Impacts Noise Endangered Species More Emphasis on Time-Phased Requirements Warfighting Capability Early New Milestone Designations MS A MS B MS C 14

DOTMLPF (Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leader Development, Personnel & Facilities) Review for Joint implications Identify deficiencies and determine solutions and cost Submit to JROC for approval of solutions and resources JFCOM has major role Joint Experimentation 15

Roles for M&S Measuring M&S Effectiveness Outcome-Based Measures - Reduced total ownership costs - Reduced acquisition cycle times - Increased operational capability - Improved ability to concurrently deploy systems with their training devices Process-Based Measures - Ability to reuse M&S - Extent of collaboration - Remain cost effective - Extent of netted and distributed network Earlier deployment of affordable, leading-edge capabilities to warfighters 16

Environmental Impacts (Noise, Air, Soil, Endangered Species & Other Effects) Encroachments into training areas reduces proficiency Restrictions on DT and OT cannot stress systems on test ranges Saturation of frequency spectrum less bandwidth availability Must be addressed during requirements generation and early system design Pay Now or Pay Later! 17

Summary Greater warfighter role in requirements generation Clear focus on interoperability Supports evolutionary acquisition & time-phased requirements Streamlines staffing process where appropriate More emphasis on DOTMLPF M&S can add value! Considers environmental impacts Early fielding of warfighting capability - M&S can add value! 18

Questions 19

Contact Information Name: Colonel Michael T. Perrin, USA Title: Division Chief, Requirements and Acquisition Division J-8, The Joint Staff Phone: (703) 614-9760 Fax: (703) 614-4701 Email: perrinmt@js.pentagon.mil 20