THE STATION AT POTOMAC YARD. Public, Private, and Non-Profit Collaboration BY HELEN S. MCILVAINE

Similar documents
NORTH CAROLINA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY. A. Robert Kucab Executive Director

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Applying for Financing for Predevelopment Activities

ALABAMA HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY

NON-PROFIT JOINT VENTURES, MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Community Revitalization Fund Tax Credit Program (CRFP) Overview and Request for Proposals (RFP)

Northern California Community Loan Fund

Request for Proposals. Housing Study Consulting Services. Proposals DUE: January 6, City of Grandview. Economic Development Department

2017 Forward Fund Proposal

REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS. Technical Advisory Panels for Two DRCOG Communities. Urban Land Institute Colorado District Council (ULI Colorado)

What do the following have

League Task Force on the Next Generation of Economic Development Tools Background Report: Community Development Corporations April 12, 2012

Project/Program Profile

Request for Proposals

CSU Dominguez Hills & DH Foundation University Village-Mixed-Use Development/Market Rate Housing LETTER OF INVITATION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

East Harlem Commercial Opportunity RFP

2015 Incubation Awards Nomination Materials

GRANTMAKING POLICIES & PROCEDURES

Promise Kept By: Gladys Cook Technical Advisor, Florida Housing Coalition

Cone Mill Master Development

SAN FRANCISCO NONPROFIT SPACE INVESTMENT FUND GRANT PROGRAM GUIDELINES February 2017

Request for Proposals

Chapter 14 Emergency Projects

Business Accelerator Operator Request for Proposals. Release Date: March 14, 2017

Neighborhood Revitalization. Fiscal Year 2017 State Revitalization Programs Application. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: Friday, July 15, 2016 at 3:00 p.m.

CRENSHAW/LAX PILOT BUSINESS SOLUTION CENTER (BSC} and METRO'S PILOT BUSINESS INTERRUPTION FUND (BIF} MONTHLY REPORT

HOME Investment Partnerships APPLICATION

APPLICATION FOR CITY OF BELLINGHAM COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (CHDO) CERTIFICATION

Submitted by: Paul Buddenhagen, Director, Health, Housing & Community Services

2013 Housing Colorado Design By Community Charrettes and Workshop for Affordable Housing

City of Los Angeles, Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report, Program

Invitation to CDCs to apply for: Advancing Equitable Development in Milwaukee HUD Section 4 Capacity Building Grants

WHITEPAPER: BUSINESS INCUBATORS

Logan Square Corridor Development Initiative Final Report Appendix

Russell County Commission. Russell County, Alabama. Request for Proposal Comprehensive Plan Pages Notice of Intent to Respond

Local Government Economic Development Incentives Survey for FY


ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 208th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JUNE 29, 1998

Status of Convention Center Hotel Project. Briefing to the Economic Development Committee August 15, 2008

Strategic Plan

Request for Qualifications Caribbean Village

Title SANTEE COURT PARKING FACILITY PROJECT / 636 MAPLE AVENUE INTER-MODAL PARKING STRUCTURE

Revolving Loan Fund Application

City of Tacoma Community & Economic Development Department Business Plan: Prosperity on Purpose for the City of Destiny*

CITY OF LANCASTER REVITALIZATION AND IMPROVEMENT ZONE AUTHORITY

Cultural Development Fund: Small or Emerging Organizations, Community Cultural Projects Application Guidelines

07/01/2010 ACTUAL START

Incentives and Economic Development Policy ELLEN HARPEL NACCTFO COURSE WASHINGTON, DC MARCH 2018

PARTNER QUICK START GUIDE. Tips and tools for United Way of the National Capital Area nonprofit partner organizations.

2018 IEDC EXCELLENCE IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AWARDS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ohio Capital Corporation for Housing

COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Date: October 25, 2016

HOW WEDC CAN ASSIST DEVELOPMENT IN YOUR COMMUNITY

requirement to be eligible for tax abatement under the CIITAP program, a 2.) Project Density Requirement - In order to meet the minimum density

San Francisco Nonprofit Space Investment Fund Grant Program Guidelines June 2018

RESOLUTION NO. THE CITY OF ASHLAND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Invitation for Business Cases / Request for Funding For Building Repairs & Small Capital Replacement

TABLE OF CONTENTS. SUBCHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 3 5: Statement of purpose 3 5: Definitions 3

Executive Search. Director of Development. Habitat for Humanity of Orange County

Guidance on Allocating Real Estate Development Costs in the Neighborhood Stabilization Program

U.S. Route 202 Analysis. New Castle County Department of Land Use May 4, 2018

REGION 5 INFORMATION FOR PER CAPITA AND COMPETITIVE GRANT APPLICANTS Updated April, 2018

City of Portsmouth Economic Development Commission 2011 Action Plan

ASTSWMO POSITION PAPER 128(a) Brownfields Funding

COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM. Presentation to New Castle County Council March 2012

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) (Technical Assistance Program)

Request for Proposals

2016 BUSINESS ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAM

PPEA Guidelines and Supporting Documents

Position Description January 2016 PRESIDENT AND CEO

Economic Development Strategic Plan Executive Summary Delta County, CO. Prepared By:

Transmittal Letter. Via Hand Delivery. January 10, 2011

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development

Economic Development Finance The Deal, The Players, The Results. Thelma Adams Johnson, MBA, EDFP

Request for Qualifications for Architectural Services

SAN FRANCISCO NONPROFIT SPACE STABLIZATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM GUIDELINES Amended January 2018

TAX PHASE-IN GUIDELINES FOR BEXAR COUNTY AND CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS GEOTECHNICAL TESTING AND REPORT RFP # February 8, 2010 PROPOSALS DUE: February 19, 2010 at 4:00 pm

Request for Proposals: Non-Profit Housing Corporation Property Acquisition and Renovation

Job Advertisement Executive Director Concord Downtown Development Corporation Issued February 5, 2018 Deadline to Respond: Friday, February 23, 2018

L AK E S TRE ET V E N T U R E S 1

Policies and Procedures for Funded Agencies

REPORT OF THE CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST

FROM GRANTS TO GROUNDBREAKING:

Guild Property Investors

Project Proposal Application

Fairfax County FY 2019 Advertised Budget The 2018 Economic Outlook Summit April 12, 2018 w w w. f a i r f a x c o u n t y. g o v / b u d g e t

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

City of Miami. City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL Meeting Agenda. Monday, July 30, :00 PM

NEIGHBORHOOD SMALL GRANTS GUIDELINE REVIEW & FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM GRANT STRATEGY. The New York Community Trust July 2012

SMALL BuSiNESS AdMiNiSTRATiON

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Rural Business Devlopment Grants: This program is a competitive grant designed

Funding Sources for Downtown Revitalization Efforts

Metrics Goal Actual Goal Actual Goal Actual Goal

2018 Special Grant Program for Community and Workforce Development

Feasibility Study for a Proposed New Multipurpose Event Venue in Cambridge. Executive Summary. Presented to the:

POLICY NAME: Sponsorship

Transcription:

THE STATION AT POTOMAC YARD Public, Private, and Non-Profit Collaboration BY HELEN S. MCILVAINE

The Station at Potomac Yard is a creative and cooperative approach to meeting multiple community needs in the City of Alexandria, Virginia. Located within a former regional rail yard, which is to be redeveloped into a walkable urban village, the project s innovative mixed-use design maximizes the use of land by combining a fire station, 64 units of affordable and workforce rental housing, and retail space, above two levels of underground parking. The project was made possible through a unique public, private, and nonprofit collaboration. The efforts of these groups the City of Alexandria; Potomac Yard Development (PYD), a joint venture of national homebuilders; and the Alexandria Housing Development Corporation (AHDC), a local non-profit housing entity allowed multiple public and private resources to be accessed to complete the project, despite the implosion of national credit markets and increasing constraints on city fiscal spending during the development period. More than 92 percent of the Station at Potomac Yard s $34 million total development cost came from non-city funding sources. While Alexandria s investment of actual dollars was limited, the city s superior bond rating, strong financial position, and willingness to provide back-stop guarantees were critical to securing other financing and investment. GETTING STARTED The Station project was conceived in early 2006 when city staff, reviewing PYD s plans for the first neighborhood to be developed, realized that the dense, urban design being proposed might hinder optimal emergency response time. The plans had already been extensively and positively vetted with the community, so all parties were interested in keeping the development schedule on track while mitigating the response time issue. PYD executives suggested that PYD would be willing to donate land and $6.6 million toward the cost of constructing a fire station within the 160+ acre Potomac Yard redevelopment site. The city, which had not built a new fire station in more than 30 years, eagerly accepted the offer. Keeping in mind A unique collaboration allowed multiple public and private resources to be accessed to complete the project, despite the implosion of national credit markets and increasing constraints on city fiscal spending during the development period. that Alexandria had lost more than half of its affordable rental housing since 2000 (a decline from 18,000 apartments to fewer than 9,000), the city also opted to use the air rights above the fire station to build a residential facility that would meet the urgent need for new affordable housing. PYD responded by offering to donate a substantial portion of its voluntary affordable housing contribution (estimated at approximately $10.5 million for the overall site) early to help fund the affordable housing project, if approved. In summer 2006, the project team (including city fire, housing, code, and planning staff, and developer and non-profit representatives) held weekly informational meetings with a mayor-appointed citizen task force and the community. These meetings led to two important outcomes. First, the community communicated its desire to include some workforce housing in the development, with rents that would be affordable for residents with incomes of up to 80 percent of the metropolitan area median income. These units would potentially serve city employees, including first responders and teachers. Second, it was confirmed that this new municipal structure would be designed and constructed according to green building standards, in accordance with Alexandria s commitment to becoming an eco-city. In September 2006, the task force issued its report endorsing the project; at its October retreat, the city council preliminarily approved $1 million to fund LEED elements. In February 2007, the planning commission and city council unanimously approved the development proposal, which included 64 apartments, with 44 affordable units and 20 workforce units. In March 2007, AHDC submitted a successful application for $10 million in low-income housing tax credits. With this award of additional equity, the station project was able to move ahead. In fact, Internal Revenue Service rules governing the low-income housing tax credit program required that the project be delivered and the affordable units occupied by the end of 2009, so construction got underway in January 2008 and the project was completed in August 2009, allowing AHDC to meet its critical December 2009 milestone. June 2011 Government Finance Review 31

THE ROLE OF CITY FINANCE STAFF The complexity of the project i.e., the number of entities involved, multiple sources of funding, varied reporting requirements of investors and lenders, a rigid construction schedule necessitated by the tax credits, and challenges encountered due to dynamic market conditions during the development s construction and stabilization periods (2008-2010) necessitated regular participation, collaboration, and leadership from the city s financial, management, and budget executives and their support to keep the project moving forward on time and on budget. Their contributions included: n Initial determination of project feasibility n Assessment of city financial support required and potential funding sources n Management of public and political support for budget items related to the project n Guidance and support in establishing Alexandria Station LLC, a specialpurpose entity comprising the city and AHDC, to develop and construct the project More than 92 percent of the Station at Potomac Yard s $34 million total development cost came from non-city funding sources. n Technical assistance to set up finance and accounting systems to track all project expenses, funds, and payments according to uses, funding sources, and participants n Strategic advice to troubleshoot and pragmatically navigate difficult market conditions n Bookkeeping and accounting for all aspects of the project: making payments to contractors, vendors and consultants; tracking and allocating PYD contributions and deposits from all funding sources; helping all parties with record keeping and audits; and responding to information requests from lenders, banks, and investors n Technical support to AHDC and its accounting team n Regular participation in monthly Alexandria Station LLC steering committee meetings to anticipate and resolve issues affecting project construction, financing, and operations n Ongoing assistance to the condominium unit owners association that governs station operations (the city is a member of the association, as it owns the fire station) The city s top financial executives were available primarily in a regular consult- 32 Government Finance Review June 2011

ing capacity, as needed, and finance and accounting administrative staff provided daily support for operations from 2007-2009. On one occasion, too, the city consulted its third-party financial advisor for independent counsel regarding soliciting a letter of credit to benefit AHDC. By associating with AHDC on this project and providing technical assistance, the city also helped AHDC build investment. its capacity and develop greater self-sufficiency to successfully undertake future projects. Although AHDC did not have full-time staff until the station was nearly complete, AHDC board members with affordable housing development, legal, and finance experience provided regular leadership to Alexandria Station LLC s development efforts. FINANCING THE PROJECT The most important financial concept demonstrated by the Station at Potomac Yard is the tremendous potential for accessing resources through collaborations among public, private, and non-profit entities. So many local and state governments face fiscal constraints similar to those Alexandria s investment of actual dollars was limited, but the city s superior bond rating, strong financial position, and willingness to provide back-stop guarantees were critical to securing other financing and experienced by Alexandria, and this model will allow them to deliver capital projects with community benefit. Municipalities that have the capacity and willingness to adopt more entrepreneurial business practices will be able to enter into effective partnerships and attract, marshal, and maximize third-party resources. Creating a special-purpose entity corporation allowed Alexandria to act more nimbly in financing, building, and managing the overall development for the station (necessary to meet the deadline imposed by the tax-credit funding). And the technical assistance, participation, and oversight provided by city finance professionals throughout the development process ensured that the requirements and fiduciary interests of the public trust were fully safeguarded. In addition to loans and grants, the city was able to provide a short-term bridge loan of $1.4 million to help AHDC pay the general contractor when the planned closing on tax credits was delayed for several weeks in the fall of 2008. The city s willingness to provide flexible interest-rate terms, to make residual receipts loans, and to subordinate its financing at The Station at Potomac Yard in late 2009, when the project was completed. (Photo by Eric Taylor.) June 2011 Government Finance Review 33

different stages of the project all helped AHDC secure non-city financing. While the city s investment of dollars in the project was proportionally smaller than some other sources (exclusive of land, around 8 percent of the total development cost), the city s active participation in the station and its willingness to provide backstop guarantees, as needed, enabled AHDC, a startup non-profit organization with no balance sheet or development track record, to secure a tax credit investor and to arrange for favorable construction to permanent financing with the Virginia Housing Development Authority (VHDA). Award-Winning Project The Station at Potomac Yard has won the following awards: n Virginia Municipal League 2010 Achievement Award n Brick in Architecture Award, 2010 n Housing and Non Profit Developers 2010 Achievement Award for Innovation, June 2010 n 2009 Virginia Housing Award Best Mixed Use or Mixed Income Housing Development, November 2009 n Fire Chief Magazine, 2009 Bronze Award for Fire Station Design n Finalist, Affordable Housing Finance 2009 Reader s Choice Award, Master Planned/Mixed Use Category n American Planning Association Award, 2008 Outstanding Project, National Capital Area n U.S. Conference of Mayors Award for Excellence in Public Private Partnerships, January 2008 n Finalist, National League of Cities Award for Municipal Excellence, August 2008 n Finalist, Urban Land Institute Ronald J. Terwilliger Center Workforce Housing Models of Excellence Award, October 2008 The most important financial concept demonstrated by the Station at Potomac Yard is the tremendous potential for accessing resources through collaborations among public, private, and non-profit entities. On AHDC s behalf, the city backed two letters of credit and provided a completion guaranty to the tax credit investor. PYD s donation of land made the project both possible and affordable over the long term. The developer s willingness to stake early dollars for predevelopment and feasibility studies (typically the most difficult project phases to finance because of risk) and to fund the initial period of construction helped AHDC get tax credits. Developer dollars also helped fund non-eligible (for tax credits) costs associated with the underground parking, the community room, and the workforce housing. By using consultants and vendors that had a relationship with PYD, the station was able to take advantage of efficiencies and knowledge that resulted in savings for the project. Because of the strict deadline for completion, financing and constructing the project had to be fast tracked as soon as the development concept was approved and tax credits awarded. Alexandria Station LLC, the special-purpose entity established to own, develop, finance, and construct the project, allowed the city, as the managing member of the corporation, to act nimbly. COSTS AND BENEFITS Between 2006 and 2010, Alexandria provided significant staffing resources to this important capital project, in addition to finance staff. The city provided technical support to AHDC in order to enhance the capacity of this start-up non-profit development organization. City departments and agencies involved included representatives from code administration, fire, general services, housing, planning, transportation and environmental services; the Office of Historic Alexandria; the city attorney s office; communications; and recreation, parks and cultural activities. The investment of city funds in actual non-personnel hard and soft costs associated with the development of the Station at Potomac Yard was approximately $3 million. Of that amount, $1.9 million was secured by a loan to AHDC that is expected to be repaid from project cash flow from the residential component over the next 15 to 20 years. 34 Government Finance Review June 2011

In addition to PYD s donation of land and its contributions to the fire station ($6.6 million) and to the housing facility ($7.5 million), other funding for the $34 million project included $8.6 million in low-income housing tax credit equity, $8.35 million in loans from the Virginia Housing Development Authority, city loans and grants, AHDC s deferred developer fee, and some ancillary project-generated revenue. The station project provided much needed, very tangible benefits to the City of Alexandria a new, state-of-the-art fire station and affordable and workforce rental housing. The new station houses multiple vehicles, stores modern firefighting and equipment for dealing with hazardous materials, and provides a suitable living environment for a male and female workforce. Both the fire station and the housing facility are green: The fire station is LEED-certified and the residential units meet Earthcraft program standards for energy efficiency and savings. The project has provided many opportunities for community engagement and education regarding affordable housing and its demographics; the very visible and iconic station building has helped change the public s perception of affordable housing. CONCLUSIONS While mixed-use projects and public-private partnerships are not new, the station represents a unique combination of uses. Despite initial concerns about combining Municipalities that have the capacity and willingness to adopt more entrepreneurial business practices will be able to enter into effective partnerships and attract, marshal, and maximize thirdparty resources. a fire station with residential apartments, the engineering and design measures taken to mitigate sound and vibration within the structure appear to have been very successful. Building residents and members of the fire station both report that the station community is thriving. Visitors from other cities, states, and countries have toured the station with the hope of replicating the concept. City staff is providing technical assistance and information to several similar projects being explored in Arlington, Virginia; Washington, D.C.; New Brunswick, New Jersey: Durham, New Hampshire; Wilmington, Delaware; the City of Frisco, Texas; and Shanghai, China. The Station at Potomac Yard design concept, which combines a municipal use with affordable housing, could be easily adapted and replicated in urban, suburban, and rural communities as part of smart growth or efficient land use planning. With monetary resources limited, governments are challenged to find and adapt new ways of providing meaningful support: mutually beneficial public, private, and/or non-profit collaborations offer excellent opportunities for local governments to maximize new resources available through strategic partnerships. y HELEN S. MCILVAINE is deputy director, Office of Housing, for the City of Alexandria, Virginia. June 2011 Government Finance Review 35