DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 2035(1 2000

Similar documents
Subj: INFORMATION MANAGEMENT/INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY POLICY FOR FIELDING OF COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF SOFTWARE

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTION OF FIELD SUPPORT ACTIVITY, WASHINGTON, DC

Information Technology Expenditure Approval Authority

CNATRAINST N6 11 Aug 2016

Subj: ACCOUNTABILITY AND MANAGEMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY PROPERTY

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND COMPTROLLER) 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

OPNAVINST N46 21 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVY INSTALLATIONS COMMAND

a. To promulgate policy on cost analysis throughout the Department of the Navy (DON).

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY. Naval Audit Service. Audit Report

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FFIC EN AGON C Q

OPNAVINST C N4 31 May 2012

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

OPNAVINST F N09D 2 JUL 2010

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Subj: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION

NAVAIR IT Compliance

REQUIRED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY LEVELS FOR NAVY INSTALLATIONS AND ACTIVITIES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

OPNAVINST N2/N6 19 Aug 2014

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

OPNAVINST H N12 3 Sep 2015

ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM POLICY AND MANAGEMENT

Subj: OVERSIGHT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM

(c) DoD Instruction of 11 March 2014 (d) SECNAVINST D (e) CNO WASHINGTON DC Z Apr 11 (NAVADMIN 124/11)

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY, ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND

a. Reference (a) and the provisions of this instruction will be implemented by OPNAV and all activities under the command of CNO.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DEPUTY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER MARINE CORPS ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

OPNAVINST A N Jan 2015

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AGENCY-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDIT OPINION

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (DON) PERSONNEL SECURITY PROGRAM (PSP) INSTRUCTION

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the. Business Information Management System (BIMS)

Subj: RESOURCES AND REQUIREMENTS REVIEW BOARD CHARTER

Naval Audit Service Audit Report Followup of Naval Audit Service Recommendations for Management of Special Tooling and Special Test Equipment Audits

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the

NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Subj: POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR RESERVE COMPONENT SAILORS SERVICE BEYOND 16 YEARS OF ACTIVE-DUTY SERVICE

Subj: PUBLIC AFFAIRS-VISUAL INFORMATION TRAINING WITH INDUSTRY PROGRAM

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NUCLEAR WEAPONS RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES

OPNAVINST DNS 25 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND

Naval Audit Service Audit Report Marine Corps Use of the Deployed Theater Accountability System

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER, NAVY INSTALLATIONS COMMAND 716 SICARD STREET, SE, SUITE 1000 WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DC

Department of Defense Investment Review Board and Investment Management Process for Defense Business Systems

Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

PROCESS FOR REQUESTING WAIVERS FOR CONTINUED USE OF UNSUPPORTED COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF SOFTWARE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON. D.C

Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF UNITED STATES FLEET FORCES COMMAND

D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CYBERSECURITY/INFORMATION ASSURANCE WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT, OVERSIGHT, AND COMPLIANCE

OPNAVINST A N Oct 2014

NAVY CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PROGRAM AND POLICY

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY 121 BLAKE ROAD ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY. Naval Audit Service. Audit Report. Government Commercial Purchase

Subj: ARMED FORCES HEALTH PROFESSIONS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM. Encl: (1) Application Procedures for Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CYBERSPACE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND CYBERSECURITY WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT AND QUALIFICATION

DOD INVENTORY OF CONTRACTED SERVICES. Actions Needed to Help Ensure Inventory Data Are Complete and Accurate

OPNAVINST E N97 7 Nov 2017

Subj: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

NG-J6/CIO CNGBI A DISTRIBUTION: A 26 September 2016 NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU JOINT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY INSIDER THREAT PROGRAM. (1) References (2) DON Insider Threat Program Senior Executive Board (DON ITP SEB) (3) Responsibilities

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C (b) OPNAVINST A (c) OPNAVINST B (d) DoD Instruction of 29 April 2008 (e) 10 U.S.C.

Subj: MANAGEMENT AND EXECUTION OF NAVY TOTAL FORCE MILITARY PAY AND PERSONNEL MATTERS

1. Purpose. To issue an update which provides clarification regarding the reporting chain of command.

Subj: CREDIT FOR PRIOR NON-FEDERAL WORK EXPERIENCE AND CERTAIN MILITARY SERVICE FOR DETERMINING LEAVE ACCRUAL RATE

OPNAVINST G N09P 17 Jul Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION AND SURVEY

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

Management Emphasis and Organizational Culture; Compliance; and Process and Workforce Development.

Subj: NAVY ACCELERATED ACQUISITION FOR THE RAPID DEVELOPMENT, DEMONSTRATION, AND FIELDING OF CAPABILITIES

Subj: IDENTIFICATION OF MAJOR PROGRAM MANAGER EQUIVALENT BILLETS

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY VICE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

DEPARTMENTOFTHENAVY COMMANDER, NAVY INSTALLATIONS COMMAND 716 SICARD STREET SE SUITE 1000 WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DC

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM FOR SECURITY AND INDEPENDENCE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE

OPNAVINST B N1/PERS-9 24 Oct 2013

Subj: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM-NAVY (ECDIS-N) CERTIFICATION PROCESS

OPNAVINST D N4 24 May (a) OPNAV M , Naval Ordnance Management Policy Manual

Subj: PROVISION OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DOCUMENTARY MATERIAL

OPNAVINST A N13 6 Dec Subj: LATERAL TRANSFER AND REDESIGNATION OF OFFICERS IN THE NAVY

DOD INSTRUCTION ACCOUNTABILITY AND MANAGEMENT OF INTERNAL USE SOFTWARE (IUS)

PARTICIPATION IN THE GOVERNMENT-INDUSTRY DATA EXCHANGE PROGRAM (GIDEP)

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 19 Dec Subj: NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY POLICY, RELATIONSHIPS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: NAVY ENLISTED OCCUPATIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Information Technology

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON. D.C

NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE

OPNAVINST DNS-H 15 Aug 2014

Naval Audit Service Audit Report Aircraft Quantitative Requirements for the Acquisition of the Joint Primary Aircraft Training System

OPNAVINST C N1 22 Apr Subj: NAVY JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS AND NAVY NATIONAL DEFENSE CADET CORPS

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE NAVAL SAFETY CENTER

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 2035(1 2000 OPNAVINST 5230.26 N6 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5230.26 From: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chief of Naval Operations INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) BUDGET STEWARDSHIP REVIEW EXECUTION AND FUNDING REALIGNME T RECOMMENDATION POLICY (a) Title 40, United States Code, Subtitle III, Section 11101 et seq (Recodification of Clinger-Cohen Act) (b) Title 10, United States Code, Section 2223 (c) SECNAVINST 5430.7N (d) SECNAVINST 5000.36A (e) SECNAV Memo, Designation of DON Deputy CIO (Navy), of 21 Nov 06 (f) OPNAVNOTE 5430 Ser DNS-32/6U826958 dtd 18 Aug 06 (g) CNO Washington DC Message 181629Z of Dec 06 (h) CNO Washington DC 072303Z Jun 05 (NAVADMIN 124/05) (i) DoD Financial Management Regulation, Volumes 2B (1) Summary of Department of the Navy Deputy CIO, Navy Responsibilities and Authorities (2) Capture the Money Compliance Checklist (3) Capture the Money Realignment Business Rules 1. Purpose. To document the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (DCNO) (Communication Networks) (N6) execution authority as Department of the Navy Deputy CIO, Navy (DDCIO(N)) for conducting Capture the Money (CTM) Budget Stewardship reviews and to specify the execution strategy and realignment business rules. 2. Scope and Applicability a. Responsibilities and Authorities. (1) References (a) and (b) establish Chief Information Officers (CIOs) for the Military Departments. Reference (c) identifies the Department of the Navy CIa (DONCIO) as the statutorily mandated senior official for Information Management (1M) and Information Technology (IT). (2) Reference (d) establishes roles and responsibilities for the development, execution, and maintenance of DON IT processes and tools. Reference (e) establishes DDCIO(N) and designates this role to Deputy. f f ~ ( N w ) ( ).

(3) Reference (f) provides the mission, functions, and organization for DCNO(N6). (4) Reference (g) from the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) establishes a priority on 1M/IT governance implementation. (5) Enclosure (1) summarizes DDCIO(N)'s Authorities and Responsibilities. c. 1M/IT Authoritative Data Sources. (1) Reference (h) directs registration of applications, servers, networks, and systems. (a) CTM will encompass the full range of USN applications, servers, and networks registered in the DON Application and Database Management System (DADMS). (b) CTM will encompass the full range of USN systems registered in the DoD IT Portfolio Repository-DON (DITPR-DON). (2) Reference (i) also directs DoD Components to provide IT budget information. (a) CTM will encompass the full range of USN budget information provided in Naval Information Technology Exhibits/Standard Reporting-web (NITE/STARweb). 3. Action a. CTM Execution Strategy. (1) Engage at the Budget Submitting Office (BSO) level. (a) The CTM process focuses on two overarching objectives: fostering IT budget stewardship and enhancing IT asset cost visibility. To achieve these objectives, the CTM Team collects extensive budget and execution information. (b) The CTM Team meets with financial personnel (comptrollers, financial analysts, etc.) to gain an understanding of the command's financial organization and processes. Additionally, the CTM Team conducts interviews with technical representatives and IT program managers from across the command to obtain further background information used to determine proper stewardship of IT resources. If the CTM Team identifies financial management concerns, it will highlight these concerns first to the Command/BSO Comptroller. Then should additional r vi w be r quired the CTM T m wil,tif of Financial Management and Budget (FMB). 2

(2) Compliance Assessment. (a) The CTM Team reviews the command's adherence to Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Department of Defense (DoD), and DON IT policy and guidance, specifically focusing on the following areas:! Assesses IT related budget execution data for compliance with government and DoD and DON instructions, including Acquisition (5000 series), Portfolio Management (8115 series), and Information Assurance (8500 series) instructions. 2 Reviews budget execution data for compliance with DoD and DON IT related guidance, including memoranda and other administrative messages. ~ Per DoD and DON guidance, the CTM Team identifies systems and applications that are not registered in DADMS, DITPR-DON, and NITE/STARweb. ~ Per DoD and DON guidance, the CTM Team identifies systems and applications contracts to identify purchased servers and hosting devices that are subject to the Server/Application Hosting Review (SAHRAP), and did not go through the mandatory review process. c Per DoD and DON guidance, the CTM Team determines if Enterprise Software Initiative (ESI) approved software licenses were purchased outside of required ESI contracts. (b) Budget execution data includes, but is not limited to, statements of work, purchase descriptions, and other pertinent contractual documents. (c) Enclosure (2) contains the Compliance Checklist. b. Compliance Remediation Strategy (1) Compliance Reporting. (a) Based on the compliance assessment N6 will generate a report identifying what was found and the recommendations for realignments as necessary.! The report will be routed to the leadership of the BSO, the Comptroller, the CIa, and the Commander. week period. 2 A response will be requested within a two 3 The C M eam will review any responses, with specific consideration given to corrections of fact or supplementary information 3

providing evidence of compliance. The review will result in a final realignment recommendation from the CTM Team. (2) Realignment Recommendation Business Rules. (a) A dollar value will be applied to each compliance issue. The recommendation will be based on needed improvements in the stewardship of IT assets and instances of noncompliance with existing DON IT, financial, or acquisition policies. 1 For each compliance issue, the dollar value will be based on the degree of non-compliance (enclosure 3). 2 The recommendation may encompass any or all of current year, budget year, and future year funding requests. (b) DCNO (N6) will coordinate with DCNO (N8), the BSO, and Command in determining details of the realignment recommendation. The best interests of the Navy will prevail in all circumstances. All funds finalized for realignment will be coordinated with DONCIO and returned to Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (OASN) for the Office of Financial Management and Comptroller (FM&C) for Navy use. DONCIO and OASN(FM&C) will collaborate on the realignment recommendations, considering the following options for redirection: Initiatives. 1 Apply to Enterprise IT Infrastructure or 2 Apply to CARS. policy. 3 Return to BSO, verifying compliance with law and 4 Ap ly to other higher Navy priorities. (c) In the event that DeNO (N6) and the BSO are unable to reach a mutually agreeable position on the realignment recommendation(s), DCNO (N6) will refer the matter to the Vice-Chief of Naval Operations (VCNO) via the Director, Navy Staff (DNS) for adjudication: 1 DCNO (N6) will prepare a package for VCNO review, outlining the history of the disputed realignment recommendation(s) and the decision(s) required. The package will be routed to VCNO via DNS, with copy to BSO and, if necessary, Resource Sponsor for chop. 2 DNS will gather any additional information required from the relevant stakeholders. If DNS cannot broker a mutually agreeable position. then DNS will schedule a decision brief with VCNO. 4

matter. 3 If required, VCNO will review and decide on the (d) Enclosure (3) contains the Realignment Business Rules. ~~~-d- M. J. EDWARDS Vice Admiral, USN Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (Communication Networks) Distribution: Electronic only, via Navy Directives Web site http://doni.daps.dla.mil 5

OPNAVINST 5230.26 Summary of Department of the Navy Deputy ClO, Responsibilities and Authorities Navy Reference PL 104 106 5122 Authority Congress Responsibility Requires SECNAV to designate principal official to implement a Capital Planning and Investment PL res 5122 information resources management plan PL 104-106 Congress Chief Information Officer is responsible for 5125.1 providing information and advice to management to ensure information resources are compliant with statue, regulation, and agency priorities PL Congress promotes 5125.3 efficient information resources management by PL Congress 5126 and improves the accuracy, security, completeness, and reliability of information maintained by the agency 10 USC Congress Additional Military Department CIO 2223 responsibilities Review and provide recommendations regarding budget requests of Information Technology and National Security Systems Ensure that all Information Technology and National Security Systems are in compliance with the standards of the Government and DoD SECNAVINST SECNAV Establishes DONCIO as senior IM/IT/NSS/1RM 5430.7N 8 official for: Oversight of DON 1M/IT compliance with applicable statutes, regulations, policy, and guidance; Leading the DON IT investment management review process in coordination with the ASN(FM&C) ; Ensuring compliance with applicable Enclosure (1)

Reference SECNAV Memo dated 21 November 06 OPNAVNOTE 54 Ser DNS-32/ 6U826958, dtd 18 Aug 06 Authority DONCIO CNO OPNAVINST 5230.26 Responsibility Designates OPNAV(N6) as DDCIO(N), outlines responsibilities Ensure that information resources are managed in an efficient and effective manner by monitoring and evaluating the performance of Navy information resource investments through a tal planning and investment control process Certify to DON CIO the completeness and accuracy of Navy IT and National Security Systems budget exhibits Ensure Navy Echelon II Command Information Officers have an additional reporting relationship to DON Deputy CIO (Navy) regarding 1M and IT compliance and guidance. DON Deputy CIO (Navy) will be consulted on the selection of Echelon II Command Information Officers and input into performance objectives and of policy, governance, and investment direction Collaborates with DONCIO to ensure optimum use of Navy 1M/IT resources Develops Navy net-centric information environment Capital Planning and Investment Strategy Assesses and certifies compliance of major automated information systems with existing DoD policies Conducts, assesses, and consolidates all study and requirements for PR/POM and Capital Investment Planning Ensures that Navy IT complies with 2 Enclosure (1)

i Did HCA determine that specific hardware, software, or IT services were essential :succcssful execution ofa command or program initiative and that it was clearly potential noncompliance issues relaled 10 thir item first to the f:;"ih.;;;~;;p;;;;;p;;;ui<~~thc-,;;;~ri;;-g,]~:ch;;s;;;g:-;;ct~;r;»:f;;;;;;;;:;;;;:?(o;:4-t-i-: BSO Comptroller, and ffno' resoh'cd al thai : I level then ;1 wi/j bel()n~'arded to FMB. Arc transactions screened with all requirements for their availability from the,mandatory Government sources of supply (i.e., JWODIUNICOR),! (ChA Sec3j 1 33) receipts detailing items purchased exist to substantiate purchases? made that exceeded the purchase card threshold of $2,5OO? (Ch.6 transactions to circumvent card Note: Checklist applies only to IT transactions. Enclosure (2)

11 Mar 08 obligations supporting IT will report IT data in preparation for the DoD's Icompom:nts to OMB Circular A-II (Exhibits 53 and 300). (DoD FMR Volume 2B, requested via Capital Asset Plan and Business Case. or financial Imlanag'~mem system budgetary resources were above S500K, was Exhibit 53 (IT in"{'dmt'nl portfolio) scnt to OMB for ahit initiatives and resource obligations ng IT? (OMB Circular A-II) by 9/9 ofeach yr. (000 FMR Volume 2B, Was a CIR (Exhibit 300) submitted for new initiatives requesting $1 M or morc in the. current PI 01'.'\ aud \\ 1'.'\ Procurelllent \pprop..ia!i"n, -1)01) I \II{ \ olullic 1 \. (hal}!"!' I Emmples include.' --New Development or mqjor upgrades. inc/uding Te'il and EV(l/U(JliolJ Requirements ~-Des;gning Prototypes and Processes --Purcha.",'e lest articles --Conduct developmentaltesling, initial operationallqsting. & Evaluation priur 10 system Procurement Appropriations (OPN, WPN) - Were all systems with a cost of$250k or more E:mmples ' --Equipment purchase after "uct'esjful 5ystem testing ~-Ilems purchu..'>ied/rom a cofnmljrcial source that can he used without mad~fication (COTS ami l1olldevelopmcnlal items)!lan inv(!slmenl The CTA! learn will reja flolenlfal non '",' mn>/t"n"" i.\'xu(,j' related to th,:\, i/(wl/ir.w 10 the Complroller, and ifnoi re:wlt'ed at thai then if will hi.~ fi}r\l. arded 10 FMB \ '\ (ollllllen" CTM learn will rekr polential n()n~ lw'mr,,/i<1nce issues reial{'(iio thh. item /irstlo the Comptroller. and ifnol resolved at thai I/;en it will heforj1'arded 10 FMB. Appropriations - Were expenses incurred in continuing operations and current ino&m? Were expenses incurred for officers and enlisted personnel performing IT functions as MPN? I('"molim,,,e issues rt!iatc,/ to this itemfirsl to the Camp/mIlt:,., and ~fnof resolved allhal (ben it tiill ht! fi}r»'ardedlo FMB. otlicers and enlisted involved in IT relaled 2 Note: Checkl.'.st applies only IT transactions. Enclosc;re (2)

Note: Checklist applies only to IT transactions. Enclosure (2) 3

Compliance Issue Potential violation of law, regulation, or statute OPNAVINST 5230.26 Capture the Money Realignment Business Rules Examples lfars "Color of Money" ADA NOAA Business Rule Current Year $ Budget Year $ Future Year $ Recommendation x x x is not negotiable; will proceed forward Pattern of IA x non-compliance Federall is not with Federal, 000 EA negotiable; will 000, DoN, or FAM I FDM proceed forward DoNCIO guidance guidance, policy, or instruction instance of non-compliance with Federal, 000, DoN, or DoNCIO guidance, policy, or See above cuss alternative resolution options with Command, applying a suspense date for completion. x information has been presented during reclama s to produce justification, applying a suspense date x Enclosure (3)