Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

Similar documents
The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

In 2007, the United States Army Reserve completed its

Wildland Fire Assistance

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

FCS Embedded Training: An Overview

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

National Guard and Army Reserve Readiness and Operations Support

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Lessons learned process ensures future operations build on successes

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

COTS Impact to RM&S from an ISEA Perspective

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

From the onset of the global war on

DETENTION OPERATIONS IN A COUNTERINSURGENCY

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

AFCEA TECHNET LAND FORCES EAST

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

New Tactics for a New Enemy By John C. Decker

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control

Capability Planning for Today and Tomorrow Installation Status Report

Report Documentation Page

MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

USMC Expeditionary Energy

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

The Landscape of the DoD Civilian Workforce

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Military Health System Conference. Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps

SPECIAL REPORT Unsurfaced Road Maintenance Management. Robert A. Eaton and Ronald E. Beaucham December 1992

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Tannis Danley, Calibre Systems. 10 May Technology Transition Supporting DoD Readiness, Sustainability, and the Warfighter. DoD Executive Agent

US Army TARDEC Ground Vehicle Mobility: Dynamics Modeling, Simulation, & Research

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

The Effects of Outsourcing on C2

Impact of Corrosion on Ground Vehicles: Program Review, Issues and Solutions

Analysis of the Operational Effect of the Joint Chemical Agent Detector Using the Infantry Warrior Simulation (IWARS) MORS: June 2008

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Report Documentation Page

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

Transcription:

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE JUN 2010 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2010 to 00-00-2010 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) TCM-Live,Fort Eustis,VA,23604 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 2010 Training & Simulation Industry Symposium (TSIS), June 9-10, 2010, Orlando, FL 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 10 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

The Charter of the TCM-Live From TCM-Live Charter (Sep 08) perform as the Army's centralized manager for combat development and user activities associated with live training systems. live fire ranges, targets, combat training centers, home station MOUT instrumentation systems, tactical engagement simulations, and relevant opposing forces systems that support the live training environment. TCM-Live is the chief architect for the design, development, and sustainment of live training components and interfaces of live training systems. From TRADOC SYSTEM MANAGEMENT TR 71-12 (Mar 02) Training. Coordinate development of home station and institutional training for individual, crew and unit. Coordinate development and fielding of training aids, devices (system and non-system), simulations and simulators for use in training in the institution, home station, and Combat Training Centers. Materiel. Coordinate TRADOC position on system reviews, ensure requirement documents are updated as needed, ensure DTLOMS and the logistics support system are in place for system testing and first unit equipped, and plan for system product improvements and recapitalization. Provide user representation in analysis of alternatives (AoAs), and other studies, evaluations, and efforts supporting the development programs.

Fundamental Premise of Live Training Live is default standard of training environments or modes. Everything, with the exception of some tasks trumped by safety considerations, can be trained live. Having Soldiers train on actual equipment in realtime, within an accurately portrayed Operational Environment, against a proportioned, hybrid enemy capable of taxing the unit to execute desired tasks, is preferable to any other mode of training.

The Training Requirements Bridge The preferred method. Trained & Ready Untrained We cross the bridge from untrained to trained, Reset to Deployment, by live training of soldiers on the actual equipment in as closely approximated operational environment as possible.

The Training Requirements Bridge However.. Trained & Ready Untrained Safety OPTEMPO Environmental Damage the Gremlins of safety, environmental damage and OPTEMPO emerge and take huge bites out of our live training bridge.

Key Supporting Idea Live training identifies gaps in the capability to train some tasks live (perhaps based upon time, money, environment, safety, etc.). Having identified those live training gaps, the virtual, constructive and gaming community at the direction of CAC-T (in concert with the proponents and ACOMs) does the research, training media analysis, and cost-benefit analysis needed to identify a solution set to filling the gaps in live training.

The Training Requirements Bridge Trained & Ready Untrained MRAP Roll-over Trainer Gaming Battlestaff CP Sim Drivers Trainer Constructive Virtual Requirements Safety OPTEMPO Environmental Damage So the virtual, constructive, gaming and distance learning TCMs help us find the patches needed to cross the chasm

Programs for Now and Tomorrow Now I-MILES Instrumented Ranges CACTF Tomorrow NLOS tactical engagement adjudication New generation of targeting CACTF w/virtual targetry and position/location

An Illustrative Briefing Live TSS Requirements Convergence Roadmap Force-on-Force CDD Force-on-Target ICD CDD Army Modernization 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 LVC-ITE Inc #1 LVC-ITE Inc #2 LVC-ITE Inc #3 BCT CP #1 BCT CP #2 GCV Soldier Program One-TESS I-MILES I-HITS HITS LIVE TESS RDT&E A-TESS CDD A-TESS #1 HITS Fielding A-TESS Prod/Field A-TESS #2 Embedded TESS Live Training Transformation Family of Training Systems (LT2-FTS) ICD CTC Modernization Range Program NTC IS JRTC IS CMTC IS Standard Targets CACTF CTIA R&D CTC-IS ECT-IS OPFOR Wheels Instr Range IS CDD FASCIT OPFOR CDD IS #1 IS 1 CACTF Fielding OPFOR #1 Product Line Architectures IS #2 OPFOR #2 OPFOR #3

Summary TCM-Live is the combat developer for Army live training Requirements are based upon Proponent and ACOM input New requirements must pass the rigor of a Capabilities-based Analysis (CBA)