Formal STIP Amendment

Similar documents
Staff Recommendation:

Section 8 Certification and Federal-Aid Project Oversight

LAP Manual 7-1 February 2014 Compliance Assessment Program Requirements

STIP/ATIP TEMPLATE GUIDANCE PART I

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Transportation Planning in the Denver Region

OF VIRGINIA S FY2018-FY2021 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

Module 2 Planning and Programming

Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Programs

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Understanding the. Program

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

WHEREAS, the Transit Operator provides mass transportation services within the Madison Urbanized Area; and

Overview of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program

Poughkeepsie Dutchess County Transportation Council Bylaws

Developing the Tribal Transportation Improvement Program

Re: Public Comment Period DRAFT Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program Amendment

NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Unified Planning Work Program Fiscal Year 2016 (July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016)

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

Statewide Performance Program (SPP) Interstate and National Highway System (NHS) Pavement

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

Table 1: AGGREGATE DATA, BY FORMULA PROGRAM 1 Information Requested Example Please Insert Your Data in This Column

FY Transportation Improvement Program

NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Project Selection Policy Update. Philip Schaffner June 20, 2018

Chris Bridges CYMPO Administrator

Missoula Urban Transportation Planning Process Public Participation Plan Prepared by

Transportation Improvement Program

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA

WELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Indianapolis MPO. Quarterly Project Tracking Policy

Availability of Draft Amendment No. 1 to the 2019 FTIP for Interagency Consultation and Public Review

Federal Funding & Project Administration 101. Presented By: Kyle Johnson, P.E. (Bolton & Menk) Dan Erickson, P.E. (Metro District State Aid Engineer)

Staff Approve Resolution R to amend the FY TIP.

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017

POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING

Amendments to the 2040 Total Mobility Plan of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization

HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP?

Unified Planning Work Program AMENDMENT

Maintaining Project Consistency throughout the Project Development Process

Draft MAPA FY2019-FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program

Transportation Improvement Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department

Limited English Proficiency Plan of the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

t J{li Northwestern Indiana

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

WHEREAS, the Transit Operator provides mass transportation services within the DUBUQUE Metropolitan Planning Area; and

Lorie Tudor, P.E. Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer. Alma Area Chamber of Commerce

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT

2018 Project Selection Process

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Years to

The Maryland Transportation Authority has. Staff Approve Resolution R to amend the FY TIP.

METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FY

Transportation Improvement Program for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana for

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions

Process Review. Santa Fe Metropolitan Planning Organization Review. July 18-19, Final REPORT. Prepared by: FHWA New Mexico Division

Mississippi Gulf Coast Metropolitan Planning Organization. Transportation Improvement Program FY

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

RULES CONCERNING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM

OVERALL WORK PROGRAM. Process and Procedures

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD 777 North Capitol Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

FFY Transportation Improvement Program MPO. Lawrence - Douglas County. Metropolitan Planning Organization

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

Transportation Planning Policy Manual

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

ODOT s Planning Program Public Involvement Process

Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1

Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Transit. State Management Plan

2018 Project Selection Process. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

Table to accompany Insight on the Issues 39: Policy Options to Improve Specialized Transportation

Program Management Plan FTA Section 5310

FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B

3. Update on the North Winchester Area Plan John Madera, NSVRC & Terry Short, VDOT

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

Project Selection Advisory Council

Objectives of this guide Page 1 Definitions Page 1 Using Federal Funds at the Council Page 2 FTA Eligible Projects Page 3 Federal Grant Application

FINAL 2013 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN (PPP) AMENDED MAY 2014

Contents. FY 2014 YEAR END REPORT Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study

Oregon Statewide Transportation Improvement Program. STIP Users Guide

KEY TAKEAWAYS THE STIMULUS BREAKDOWN

Amendments to FY Transportation Improvement Program of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (CORE MPO) August 2017

I-95 Southbound Collector-Distributor (CD) Lanes - Rappahannock River Crossing From Exit 130 (Route 3) To Exit 133 (Route 17)

Transportation Fund Sources Available to Units of Local Government

PROJECT SELECTION Educational Series

Overview of Planning & Programming in Minnesota

R E G I O N A L PLANNING CO MMISSION P O L I C I E S A N D P R O C E D U R E S MANUAL

Transportation Advisory Board Regional Program Year Policy

Appendix B. FAQ Brochure LOCHSTP Plan Outline Transportation Service Survey Project Prioritization Criteria

Proposal for Better Aligning Block Groups & TAZs

State Management Plan For The Administration Of The Section Nonurbanized Area Formula Grant Program And Rural Transportation Assistance Program

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015

Mid-East RPO - SPOT Local Input Point Assignment Methodology

Transcription:

FHWA/FTA AND MNDOT GUIDANCE FOR FORMAL STIP AMENDMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE STIP MODIFICATIONS Effective: April 15, 2015 The STIP may be updated periodically throughout the course of the year for project additions, advancements, changes in scope, cost, and other types of changes. These changes are accomplished either by a Formal STIP Amendment or an Administrative STIP Modification. Every effort should be made to keep Formal STIP Amendments and Administrative STIP Modifications to a minimum. Formal STIP Amendment Before Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or Federal Transit Administration (FTA) can approve a Formal STIP Amendment, the associated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)'s TIP must also be amended if the project is within the geographic boundaries of the MPO. Generally, the MPO Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) may only be amended by a formal approval action of the MPO Policy Board. FHWA Formal STIP Amendment - For projects using highway funds, formal STIP amendments are required based on the following criteria: The change adds new individual FHWA funded projects. The change adds a regionally significant project (see Page 5 for regional significant project definition). The change impacts financial constraint, including total cost increases or decreases meeting the Formal STIP Amendment thresholds. The change adds or removes a phase of work such as preliminary engineering, right-of-way, construction, etc. to the project which increases or decreases the total project cost. The change results in project scope change includes, but not limited to, changing work type such as bridge rehabilitation to replacement, resurface to reconstruct, adding additional work/bridge/lane/intersection/route. The change in project limit/termini greater than 0.3 miles in any direction. The change impacts air quality conformity for projects in an MPO. 1

FHWA FORMAL STIP AMENDMENT THRESHOLDS STIP Total Project Estimate Cost < $1,000,000 FHWA Formal STIP Amendment required if increase/decrease more than: No Formal STIP Amendment required* $1,000,001 to $3,000,000 50% $3,000,001 to $10,000,000 35% $10,000,001 to $50,000,000 20% $50,000,001 to $100,000,000 15% > $100,000,000 10% *No Formal STIP Amendment is required when a STIP total project estimate cost is less than $1 million AND the proposed total estimate cost remains less than $1 million. FTA Formal STIP Amendment - For projects using transit funds, Formal STIP Amendments are required based on the following criteria: The change adds new individual FTA funded projects to the current approved STIP. The change increases the STIP total project estimate cost by more than 20%. The change impacts air quality conformity for projects in an MPO. FTA FORMAL STIP AMENDMENT THRESHOLDS STIP Total Project Estimate Cost FTA Formal STIP Amendment required if increase more than: Any amount 20% 2

Administrative STIP Modification Project changes which do not meet the criteria for Formal STIP Amendment may be accomplished by simply changing minor information on the project. FHWA Administrative STIP Modification For projects using highway funds, Administrative STIP Modifications are required based on the following criteria: The increase or decrease in cost estimate meeting FHWA Administrative STIP Modification thresholds. Justification is required to maintain fiscal constraint. Identifying a new project from a federal set-aside in the same state fiscal year. Change in STIP year. Projects are advanced or deferred within STIP years with no changes to cost or scope. Justification is required to maintain fiscal constraint. The addition of a state funded project to the STIP, which is not regionally significant. Converting a state funded project to a federally funded project with no changes to scope or cost. Justification is required to maintain fiscal constraint. The change adds a locally funded project to an existing federally funded project in the STIP if the revised total project cost is greater than $2 million. This applies to both MnDOT let and local let project. No action required if the revised total project cost is less than $2 million. The change includes making a technical correction. Adding or removing Advance Construction (AC) includes adding new AC, increase or decrease existing AC amount, or taking an existing AC off a project. Removing a project currently programmed in the STIP. Splitting a project into two or more projects. Splitting projects have to be located within the original planned location, no change in combined total cost, and no shift in state fiscal year (OTSM s prior approval required). FHWA ADMINISTRATIVE STIP MODIFICATION THRESHOLDS STIP Total Project Estimate Cost < $1,000,000 Administrative STIP Modification required if increase/decrease more than: No Administrative STIP Modification required** $1,000,001 to $10,000,000 20% $10,000,001 to $100,000,000 10% >$100,000,000 *** 3

**No Administrative STIP Modification is required when a STIP total project estimate cost is less than $1 million AND the proposed total estimate cost remains less than $1 million. ***Processing an Administrative STIP Modification for high profile projects (greater than $100 million), which the change impacts financial constraint, requires prior collaborative discussion between MnDOT and FHWA. FTA Administrative STIP Modification For projects using transit funds, Administrative STIP Modifications are required based on the following criteria: Moving projects between years of the current approved STIP. Changing FTA funding source such as changing from Section 5307 funds to Section 5339 funds or vice versa. Changing federal funding from FTA funds to FHWA funds or vice versa. Fiscal constraint justification required. Making a technical correction. Changing the State Project Number. Who Approves Formal STIP Amendment Formal STIP Amendments involving only highway funds are approved by FHWA. Formal STIP Amendments involving only transit funds are approved by FTA. Formal STIP Amendments involving both highway and transit funds require joint FHWA and FTA approval. Formal STIP Amendment Process The Districts, or the partners in consultation with the District/ATP, initiate Formal STIP Amendment. Amendments to the STIP should be considered by the Specialty Office or District/ATP, submitted to the appropriate District for concurrence, and forwarded to OTSM. OTSM will then review, approve the Formal STIP Amendment, and request FHWA/FTA approval. Approval of a Formal STIP Amendment at the state and federal level is dependent upon appropriate public involvement and continued financial constraint of the STIP. The amendment of a MPO TIP for an area designated as a non-attainment or maintenance area requires an air quality conformity determination. Transparency and Public Participation A list of current Formal STIP Amendments and Administrative STIP Modification can be found at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/planning/program/stip.html 4

Roles and Responsibilities MnDOT Districts or Specialty Offices who request formal STIP Amendment and Administrative STIP Modifications are responsible for the accuracy of project information provided on the form and notifying appropriate partners of the status. OTSM is responsible for coordinating, processing Formal STIP Amendment and Administrative STIP Modification, and notifying the Districts or Specialty Offices of the status. Definition of Regional Significant Project Regionally significant project means a transportation project (other than an exempt project) that is on a facility which serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and from the area outside of the region, major activity centers in the region, major planned developments such as new retail malls, sports complexes, etc., or transportation terminals as well as most terminals themselves) and would normally be included in the modeling of a metropolitan area's transportation network, including at a minimum all principal arterial highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities that offer an alternative to regional highway travel. 5