Edmonton s Joint Use Agreements. Annual Report

Similar documents
Family and Community Support Services (FCSS) Program Review

Use of External Consultants

Strategic Plan

Aboriginal Community Capital Grants Program Guide

MUSKOKA AND AREA HEALTH SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION COUNCIL TERMS OF REFERENCE

QUINTE HEALTH CARE PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNANCE AND BOARD ACCOUNTABILITY

Project Report: Achieving Value for Money Charles Jago Northern Sport Centre

Guelph Sustainable Neighbourhood Engagement Framework

Community Conversation Guide

Minister's Expert Panel Report on Public Health in an Integrated Health System

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM 4 COMMUNITY BEAUTIFICATION GRANT 5 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDING 7

MLA Advisory Committee to Review Eligible Organizations Access to and Distribution of Proceeds from Licensed Casino Events

Appendix 5A. Organization Registration and Certification Manual. WORKING DRAFT-August 26, 2014

Ab o r i g i n a l Operational a n d. Revised

JOINT USE AGREEMENT: FACILITIES INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR: COMMUNITY USERS OF SCHOOL FACILITIES

How the Quality Improvement Plan and the Service Accountability Agreement Can Transform the Health Care System

Chapter 3: Business Continuity Management

Appendix 5A. Organization Registration and Certification Manual

A review of the Gamma Knife Neurosurgery Program administered by Alberta Health

COMMUNITY AND GOVERNMENT SERVICES SPORTS AND RECREATION GRANTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS POLICY

Urban Indigenous Programming in Toronto Team members: Rupinder Bagha, Katerina Stamadinos, Nicole Winger, Tony Yin Date: April 3, 2018

Social Enterprise Sector Strategy Page 1

BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITIES

SECTION 8 JANUARy 2015

SPORT FACILITY RENEWAL FUNDING PROGRAM GUIDELINES 2013 FUNDS

Intermediate Milestones (500 words) Current: 260 words This section should answer the following questions:

Columbus and Franklin County Continuum of Care Governance and Policy Statements

Veterans Affairs Canada Annual Report on the Administration of the Privacy Act April 1, 2011 March 31, 2012

ARIZONA FOSTERING READINESS AND PERMANENCY PROJECT. Usability Testing Final Report

2017 COMMUNITY IMPACT GRANT APPLICATION

Department Edmonton Economic Development Corp.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS:

St. Jude Church CYO Athletic Club Bylaws

Community involvement in wind energy: DECC guidance. Cheryl Hiles, Director, Regen SW

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 4 COMMUNITY BEAUTIFICATION GRANT 5 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDING 7 COMMUNITY PLAN ON HOMELESSNESS 9

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Alberta Health Services Continuing Care Resolution Team Final Report

Regina Community Grants Program

grant guidelines Community Investment Program (CIP) Arts Operating Grant - Professional CADAC Purpose Eligibility Evaluation criteria

Compliance and Business Ethics Program June 9, 2017

Pennsylvania Office of Developmental Programs (ODP) Independent Monitoring for Quality (IM4Q) Manual. January 2016

STRATEGIC PLAN. OWSA Strategic Pan Page 1

Toronto 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games

Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative for Health Care Organizations in Ontario

ERN Assessment Manual for Applicants 2. Technical Toolbox for Applicants

Town of Killam Municipal Sustainability Plan. Town of Killam. Municipal Sustainability Plan. Page 1

Province of Alberta ALBERTA HEALTH ACT. Statutes of Alberta, 2010 Chapter A Current as of January 1, Published by Alberta Queen s Printer

Aboriginal Service Plan and Reporting Guidelines

Appendix H Sample Partnership Policy

1. Call to Order: Town of Bon Accord Regular Meeting of Council was held on Tuesday, June 16, Mayor Boyd called the meeting to order at 7:47 pm.

PIIKANI NATION 2017 GRANT EQUITY APPLICATION FORM

Downtown Shoulder Area Community Improvement Plan. Investing in our Community

Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative for Health Care Organizations in Ontario

PROGRAM GUIDE: THE ALBERTA SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION AND RESEARCH INITIATIVE (ASBIRI)

Service Coordination. Halton. Guidelines. Your Circle of Support. one family. one story. one plan.

Performance audit report. Department of Internal Affairs: Administration of two grant schemes

OVERVIEW OF UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS

Toronto District School Board

Request for Proposal HQC

Best Start Regional Support Networks Request for Proposals Questions & Answers

DIRECTOR FOR DELEGATED ABORIGINAL AGENCIES CASE PRACTICE AUDIT REPORT CARRIER SEKANI FAMILY SERVICES (IQB, IQC, IQF)

Minister s Monitoring Committee On Workers Compensation

January Alberta Infection Prevention and Control Strategy

MARCH 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Procurement Support Centre

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: COMPACT BLUE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Development of a Master Plan for Shoelace Park on the Bronx River Greenway

Re: Feedback on Interim Guidance Document on Physician-Assisted Death. Re: Response to Request for Stakeholder Feedback on Physician-Assisted Dying

Status Entrepreneur Assistance Program

RE: Proposed Remediation Program to Reduce the Contamination Risk at Gas Stations

Columbus & Franklin County Continuum of Care Governance and Policy Statements

SALADO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

Mental Health and Addictions Supports for District School Boards

TABLE OF CONTENTS B. FISCAL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES C. FISCAL BUSINESS PLAN GOALS D. SHARED SERVICES...

Table of Contents. Letter to the Honourable H. Frank Lewis... Letter to the Honourable Patrick W. Murphy... Introduction... 1

CHAIR AND MEMBERS STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING ON OCTOBER 26, 2015

REPORT 2015/189 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

Northern College Business Plan

The Patients First Act Backgrounder

CLEAN TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS INNOVATION

Standards of Excellence

Integrated leadership for physicians, health care executives, hospitals and health systems

INTEGRATION SCHEME (BODY CORPORATE) BETWEEN WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL AND GREATER GLASGOW HEALTH BOARD

4.07. Infrastructure Stimulus Spending. Chapter 4 Section. Background. Follow-up to VFM Section 3.07, 2010 Annual Report. Ministry of Infrastructure

Legal Aid Ontario 2013/ /16 Public business plan

4 YORK REGION SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE CENTRE 2004 ANNUAL REPORT AND 2005 WORK PROGRAM

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Sage Seniors Association. Health Services for Seniors Mobile Health Service Providers

Terms of Reference. Consultancy to support the Institutional Strengthening of the Frontier Counties Development Council (FCDC)

ATI Annual Report. Report on the Access to Information Act AECL's Access to Information and Privacy Office UNRESTRICTED

Return Applications and Required Attachments ELECTRONICALLY by 4:30 p.m., November 1, 2017 to:

COUNTY OF DUNN, WISCONSIN REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROCUREMENT NO CSB CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Taking Action Against Elder Abuse Coordinated Community Response Grant Program

ALBERTA HISTORICAL RESOURCES FOUNDATION MUNICIPAL HERITAGE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM Guidelines

Northline Solar Project

2016/ /19 SERVICE PLAN

Subj: ACCOUNTABILITY AND MANAGEMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY PROPERTY

Toolkit to Support Effective Collaboration within an Integrated Care Team

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND LONG-TERM CARE. Summary of Transfer Payments for the Operation of Public Hospitals. Type of Funding

ONTARIO SENIORS SECRETARIAT SENIORS COMMUNITY GRANT PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Transcription:

Edmonton s Joint Use Agreements Annual Report 2011 2012

Executive Summary The City of Edmonton and local school boards have been collaborating to benefit Edmontonians since 1959. The Joint Use partners (Edmonton Public School Board, Edmonton Catholic School Board, Conseil scolaire Centre-Nord and the City of Edmonton) work together to optimize the benefits of shared use by regularly sharing development information, providing updates on ongoing projects and identifying opportunities for partnerships and other strategic alignments. This has resulted in joint use sites that are collaboratively planned, developed and operated. Such collaboration between the City and school boards is beneficial to the city as a whole. 2012 has been a very successful year for Edmonton s Joint Use Agreement. A major milestone was achieved when consensus was reached between the City and all three school boards on the ownership of school building envelopes (2010 and future) and adjacent associated sport fields as well as the appropriate application of reserve designations for these sites. Another significant achievement has been the extension of the Summer Access pilot project. The project was extended for the summer of 2012 and was expanded to include a Summer Facility Access Coordinator with funding provided through REACH Edmonton. The Coordinator worked one on one with the community groups in processing applications for space needed, determining what funding was available and assisting with orientation by the schools for the space allocated. This allowed seven new and emerging community groups with over 500 kids to access 430 hours of school space over the summer to deliver educational support programs. The Facilities Management Committee (FMC) is pleased to report that over 53,000 hours of gymnasium use and 131,000 hours of sport field use were booked this year by not-for-profit community groups. In addition, use of arenas, pools and tennis courts increased from last year. Late notice cancellations were reduced by 25% indicating that progress is being made through the work of the FMC. Attention to this matter will continue in the coming year as the FMC works towards reducing cancellations. FMC has been working on improving the allocations process and definitions of joint use facilities. As a result there is enhanced access by schools to a wide range of activities at City recreation centres. In addition, JUA partners have improved the format for submission of available time resulting in significant efficiencies. The Land Management Committee (LMC) facilitated cooperative planning of school sites which supported four new schools being completed in 2012, and ten school sites in growth areas being assembled. Over the past year, the LMC also worked to improve and update processes. LMC reviewed the process for transfer of ownership for eight 2010 ASAP school sites and provided clarification to the Province of Alberta to complete title transfer. Potential impacts of additions and modular classrooms to fields of P3 schools Annual Report 2011/2012 1

were reviewed and consensus reached on process to follow to resolve site issues should they arise. School Needs Assessment process was reviewed and recommendations were made to Steering Committee. In addition, work has commenced on the confirmation of school envelope data for the City of Edmonton POSSE database. LMC will continue to work towards the possibility of shared access to this data for greater accuracy and efficiency among JUA partners. About This Report The Joint Use Agreement (JUA) Annual Report is intended for Edmonton City Council, the Board of Trustees of the three school districts, senior management of the partners, government officials and the general public. This report covers the period from July 1, 2011 to August 31, 2012. It describes the activities and accomplishments of the, highlights school/park site status changes, provides statistical information on the shared use of facilities and identifies priorities for 2012/2013. 2 Annual Report 2011/2012

The About the The (JUA) are formal agreements between the City of Edmonton, Edmonton Public School Board, Edmonton Catholic School Board and Conseil scolaire Centre-Nord (Greater North Central Francophone School Board.) The original JUA was signed in 1959; it was split into two agreements in 2007 when the Facilities agreement was signed, followed by the Land agreement signed in 2009. The are principle-based, focused on collaboration and cooperation. The spirit of the Agreements is fully supported by all four partners. Joint Use Agreement: Facilities It is through the Joint Use Agreement: Facilities that arenas, pools and other City facilities are made available to school children during the school day, and school facilities are made available to community groups after school hours. Sport fields are shared among school and community groups. Annual Report 2011/2012 3

Joint Use Agreement: Land The Joint Use Agreement: Land guides the planning, assembly, design, development and maintenance of Joint Use Sites for school, recreation and park purposes, and provides the framework for decision-making related to surplus reserve and non-reserve sites, as well as reserve accounts. This has resulted in joint use sites that are collaboratively planned, developed and operated. 4 Annual Report 2011/2012

Governance The are managed by a Steering Committee comprised of representatives from each of the parties. The Steering Committee maintains a strategic leadership role, advocating the principles of the agreement and recommending policy to the Superintendents of the school districts and the City Manager. The Steering Committee supports and coordinates the activities of two subcommittees, the Facilities Management Committee and the Land Management Committee. Operational matters are delegated to the subcommittees. Members of the JUA Steering Committee are: Lyall Brenneis (Chair), City of Edmonton Peter Ohm, City of Edmonton Jennifer Thompson, Edmonton Catholic Schools Ron Chomyc, Edmonton Catholic Schools John Nicoll, Edmonton Public Schools Lorne Parker, Edmonton Public Schools Henri Lemire, Conseil scolaire Centre-Nord Craena Coyne, Joint Use Coordinator As well, the JUA Steering Committee would like to thank Heather McRae from the City of Edmonton, for her significant contributions as Chair for the past year and as a committee member for over five years. Lyall Brenneis Peter Ohm Jennifer Thompson Ron Chomyc John Nicoll Lorne Parker Henri Lemire Craena Coyne Annual Report 2011/2012 5

Steering Committee Highlights for 2011/2012 Cooperating for Edmonton Achievements The Steering Committee worked collaboratively over the past year. Some of the achievements in 2011/2012 included: Reaching a resolution of the sport field ownership and designation issue. Summer Access Pilot Project continued in the summer of 2012 Four new schools have been constructed on vacant sites in new and redeveloped areas through the provincial Alberta Schools Alternative Procurement (ASAP) program. Continuing oversight of Land Management Committee (LMC) and the Facilities Management Committee (FMC) on the application of the agreements in daily operations. Maintained and expanded JUA partnerships established in the past 50 years. Sport field Municipal School Reserve (MSR) Designation A major milestone was achieved when the JUA Steering Committee reached a consensus between the City and all three school boards on the ownership of school building envelopes and adjacent sport fields as well as the appropriate application of reserve designations for these sites. In 2010, nine new schools (six Public and three Catholic) were opened in Edmonton. Upon completion of construction, the City wished to transfer title to the appropriate school board for the site. That required a review of the JUA: Land agreement and discussion with the JUA partners. As a result, a schedule to the agreement was developed to guide staff relative to title transfer and reserve designation. This will ensure timely transfers in support of new school construction and vibrant communities. Summer Access Pilot Project The JUA Steering Committee approved the continuation of the Summer Access pilot project for the summer of 2012 to build on the success of the previous year. The purpose of the project is to provide summer access to school facilities, matching group needs to available facilities on a case by case basis through the Joint Use Agreement. Allocation procedures took into account the operational requirements for school maintenance during summer months. A working group consisting of school board representatives, social workers, community recreation coordinators, grants coordinator, aboriginal liaison coordinators, Green Shack coordinator, Out of School Time (OST) and REACH Edmonton met regularly to work together to raise awareness of this opportunity and reduce barriers to access for groups. It was agreed that a Summer Facility Access Coordinator was needed to build awareness of the opportunity and to assist the community groups navigate 6 Annual Report 2011/2012

processes for obtaining funding, planning programs and accessing the space needed. REACH Edmonton generously provided the funding for the position and a coordinator was hired. The coordinator worked one on one with community groups in processing applications for space needed, identifying funding sources and assisting with orientation with the schools for the space allocated. As a result, 21 applications were submitted by various community groups interested in accessing space in schools for summer camp programs, largely focused on providing summer time academic support, leadership and mentoring, guidance, cultural programming and recreational activities. Over six weeks, between July 3 and August 9, seven groups booked space in six schools. These groups provided programming for about 500 kids and their families using 430 hours in the schools. A major success during the summer was the facilitation of two distinct community groups (Aboriginal and Somali) coming together to share space in a school which resulted in a cultural sharing event for the youth from these programs! There were challenges and barriers to a number of groups applying for summer access and the top three barriers were related to costs for space and programming. Many of the groups are managed by volunteers and were not able to access funding to cover the related costs. Additionally, the tight timelines for planning summer access was challenging for many groups. This project has lead to a greater understanding by JUA partners and school board administration on the logistics of arranging summer access. In addition, there is increased awareness of the number of community agencies coordinating summer programming in school or community facilities. The connections developed through this project will lead to future collaborations. Steering Committee Priorities for 2012/2013 Communicate the benefits of the and advocate for Joint Use at all political levels. Strengthen partner relationships and develop proactive, coordinated efforts on Joint Use issues. Manage expectations from the ELEVATE report and its impact on schools. Adapt to situations and opportunities to deliver more services to community and schools. Monitor development of new Joint Use sites and facilities. A complete review of vacant sites by school boards scheduled for 2012. Review performance measures of subcommittees. Ensure consistent application of JUA principles. Annual Report 2011/2012 7

Facilities Management Committee Introduction The Facilities Management Committee (FMC) was inaugurated in February 2008, and is focused on the implementation of the Joint Use Agreement: Facilities. The Facilities Management Committee consists of representatives from each of the joint use partners with the position of Chair rotating among partners each year. Representatives have significant expertise on joint use matters and have worked diligently both at meetings and between meetings to implement new procedures and processes. Nine (9) FMC meetings were held. Members of the Facilities Management Committee for 2011 to 2012 are: Cheryl Shinkaruk, Edmonton Catholic Schools (Chair) Jennifer Thompson, Edmonton Catholic Schools (Steering Committee Liaison) Rob Tarulli, Edmonton Catholic Schools Andrew Morgan, Edmonton Public Schools Josephine Duquette, Edmonton Public Schools Corrie Yusypchuk, Edmonton Public Schools Nicole Bugeaud, Conseil scolaire Centre-Nord Greg Witt, City of Edmonton Pete Millar, City of Edmonton Craena Coyne, Joint Use Coordinator In addition, the EPSB maintained the position of JUA Ombudsman. While this role was internal to EPSB, many of the activities related directly to facilities. The value of the information shared by the Ombudsman to the school principals as well as to FMC partners and JUA users was very beneficial. Specifically, she attended regular FMC meetings, made a presentation to gym users at the information session and assisted with the organization of bookings for the Summer Access pilot project. 8 Annual Report 2011/2012

Achievements The FMC spent considerable time working on solutions to meet the needs of the partners and the general public. As a result, the FMC is working more cohesively with greater understanding and realization of ongoing issues, and are improving communication with users groups on efforts made to mitigate outstanding issues. This is reflected in the results of the first-ever FMC relationship survey where the majority of responses indicated a rating of good or very good. FMC is pleased to report the following achievements: Over 53,000 hours of gymnasium use and 131,000 hours of sport field use booked by not-for-profit community groups. Prepared a timeline for 2011/2012 allocation. In addition, JUA partners met to determine the best method for submitting available time which resulted in significant efficiencies. Significant reduction in late notice cancellations of gym space. Process developed for better access by schools to a wide range of activities at City Recreation Centres. Pool space allocation issues resolved. Summer access pilot project was extended another year and expanded to include a Summer Facility Access Coordinator. This allowed seven new and emerging community groups with over 500 kids to access 430 hours of school space over the summer for education support programs. FMC conducted a yearly review of the Cost Model and agreed that no changes were required to the available hour or additional hour rate. Gymnasium weekly report was utilized at each FMC meeting allowing cancellations to be closely monitored thus leading to a better understanding of facility usage by partners. Annual Report 2011/2012 9

Shared Use of Joint Use Facilities Community Use of School Facilities 70,000 60,000 Gymnasium Use Classroom & Ancillary Space Use Number of Hours Used 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 Gymnasium Hours 55,534 58,903 56,549 53,739 Classroom/Ancillary Space Hours 3,221 4,217 2744 2480 Note: There was a slight reduction in gym hours booked due to additional facilities being available within the City overall with the opening of the GO Centre, Terwillegar Recreation Centre and St Francis Xavier. 10 Annual Report 2011/2012

Sportsfield Use on School/Park Sites after School Hours 140,000 120,000 Number of Hours Used 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 Hours of Use 103,444 102,566 129,696 130,920 School Use of City Facilities 7,000 6,000 Arenas Pools Tennis Courts Picnic Sites Number of Hours Used 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 Arenas 6,400 5,924 6,385 6,509 Pools 4,836 4,962 4,808 5,073 Tennis Courts 3,657 4,060 3,812 4,270 Picnic Sites 382 367 741 341 Annual Report 2011/2012 11

Gym Utilization Rates 120% 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 100% 80% Percentage of Hours Used 60% 40% 20% 0% AA A B C D Total Gym Size Categories 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 Percentage of Hours Used - All gym types 60% 73% 67% Gym Usage All Boards Gym Size 2010-2011 Available 2010-2011 Booked 2010-2011 Utilization 2011-2012 Available 2011-2012 Booked* 2011-2012 Utilization AA 6,148 5,693 93% 4,880 5,370 110% A 6,255 5,824 93% 6,305 6,592 105% B 27,311 21,405 78% 30,305 19,204 63% C 15,014 9,189 61% 16,216 9,204 57% D 22,954 14,438 63% 22,981 13,369 58% Total 77,682 56,549 73% 80,686 53,739 67% * Indicates available and additional time 12 Annual Report 2011/2012

Land Management Committee Introduction The Land Management Committee (LMC) was formed in 2009 to manage the implementation of the JUA: Land Agreement. The Land Management Committee consists of representatives from each of the Joint Use partners with the position of Chair rotating among partners each year. Representatives have significant expertise on joint use matters and worked diligently both at meetings and between meetings to implement new procedures and processes, and to resolve issues. Nine (9) LMC meetings were held. Members of the Land Management Committee for 2011 to 2012 are: Marco Melfi, Edmonton Public Schools (Chair) Josephine Duquette, Edmonton Public Schools Roland Labbe, Edmonton Public Schools Jennifer Thompson, Edmonton Catholic Schools (Steering Committee Liaison) Rob Tarulli, Edmonton Catholic Schools Henri Lemire, Conseil scolaire Centre-Nord Tim McCargar, City of Edmonton Dave Howell, City of Edmonton Gabriele Barry, City of Edmonton Craena Coyne, Joint Use Coordinator Achievements LMC is pleased to report the following achievements resulting from the JUA: Land and the work of the partner representatives on the Land Management Committee: 1. Sport field ownership issue resolved by the JUA Steering Committee with the approval of Schedule D as an appendix to the JUA: Land agreement 2. LMC reviewed the process for transfer of ownership for eight 2010 ASAP sites and provided clarification to the Province of Alberta to complete title transfer. Title transfer for the four 2012 ASAP sites is being completed by the City of Edmonton. 3. Potential impacts of additions and modular classrooms to fields of P3 schools reviewed and consensus reached on process to follow. 4. School Needs Assessment process reviewed and recommendations made to Steering Committee. 5. Work commenced on the confirmation of school envelope data for the City of Edmonton POSSE database. LMC will continue to work towards the possibility of shared access to this data for greater accuracy and efficiency among JUA partners. 6. Discussion commenced on ways to streamline zoning options to clarify uses and improve efficiency. 7. A LMC member is representing JUA partners by participating on the Design Annual Report 2011/2012 13

Team in the development of the City of Edmonton Design Guidelines for New Neighbourhoods. This work will continue into the coming year. 8. Capital plans for all JUA partners are shared and opportunities discussed. Cooperative Planning of Joint Use Sites The following summary chart illustrates the status of school sites in Edmonton along the lifecycle continuum from unassembled sites through to sites where future use has been determined. 2012 School Sites Status Summary 68 52 27 23 10 39 Unassembled Under Assembly Vacant Built Closed School Surplus Future Use Determined 288 2010-2011 2011-2012 Planning & Collaboration Efforts (JUA: Land Sec 4): (Snapshot of the status of Joint Use school sites for current year) # Joint Use sites in approved plans (unassembled) 56 52 # Joint Use sites under assembly for future needs 9 10 # Joint Use sites ready for school construction 33 39 Development & Maintenance (JUA: Land Section 5): # School sites maintained each year 366 377 Inventory Review (JUA: Land Sections 6-9) # of school sites declared surplus 3 0 # of surplus sites new use determined (JUA use) 4 0 # of surplus sites new use determined (non-jua use) 1 2 2011/2012 School/Park Site Status Changes School Board School Site Neighbourhood Status Change # EPSB Prince Rupert Prince Rupert Surplus (Being resolved sale pending) EPSB Wellington Athlone Surplus (Being resolved sale pending) 2 14 Annual Report 2011/2012

Appendices Principles of the Joint Use Agreement: Facilities The Parties agree that the Principles will be considered when any Party enters into an arrangement with another public or private entity for the development of facilities. The Parties are committed to the following Principles with respect to the shared use of Joint Use Facilities: ACCESS AUTONOMY AND ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRITY CONFLICT RESOLUTION COOPERATION COMMUNICATION COSTS TO PARTIES COLLABORATION FOR COMMUNITY BENEFIT EQUITY OF DECISION-MAKING TRANSPARENCY AND OPENNESS Subject to available resources, the Parties will make available their respective facilities for use by the other Parties and the community. The Parties honour their respective organizational cultures, mandates, budget and administrative process. Each of the Parties is an independent, autonomous entity and has the right to determine which of their facilities shall be made available as Joint Use Facilities based on what the Boards and Council believe to be in the best interests of the people they serve. When difficulties arise between the Parties, the Parties shall work together to resolve such difficulties in a respectful way and with a spirit of cooperation and collaboration. The Parties shall work together to ensure that the rights of each are respected and that the Operating Guidelines are followed. The Parties will undertake ongoing dialogue and communication with Parties and User Groups during the term of the Agreement. Every effort will be made to keep the costs as low as possible. The Parties shall work together as partners, recognizing that the needs of the community for educational and recreational opportunities can best be achieved through a combination of their respective resources. There shall be equal authority among the Parties to the Agreement with respect to decision-making. The Parties shall make available to each other such information as is necessary to ensure the Principles and Operating Guidelines of this Agreement are being observed. Annual Report 2011/2012 15

Principles of the Joint Use Agreement: Land The Parties are committed to the following Principles with respect to the acquisition, planning, development, maintenance and disposition of Joint Use school/park sites. COOPERATIVE PLANNING EFFICIENCY and PLANNING SHARED COSTS EQUAL PARTNERSHIP RESERVE DEDICATION TRANSPARENCY AND OPENNESS CONFLICT RESOLUTION AUTONONMY and ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRITY Joint Use Sites shall be cooperatively planned and managed. The parties shall work together to ensure that the rights of each are respected. The resources of the four parties shall be efficiently used for the maximum benefit of the community. Costs associated with the administration of the Agreement be fairly and equitably shared among the four parties to the Agreement. There shall be equal authority among the parties to the Agreement with respect to decision-making. All Reserve Land and Reserve funds provided, dedicated or obtained after the Effective Date shall be used, where appropriate, for the purpose of creating and developing sites for such uses as are allowable pursuant to the Municipal Government Act. The Parties shall make available to each other such information as is necessary to ensure the Principles of this Agreement are being observed. When difficulties arise among the parties, the parties shall work together to resolve such difficulties in a respectful way and with a spirit of cooperation and collaboration. The parties honour the respective organization cultures, mandates, budge and administrative process of the other parties. 16 Annual Report 2011/2012

7th floor, CN Tower 10004-104 Ave, P.O. Box 2359 Edmonton, AB T5J 2R7 jointuse@edmonton.ca Phone: (780) 496-3090 www.edmonton.ca/jointuse