Open Project Selection Process

Similar documents
OUTDOOR RECREATION ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

Florida Department of Environmental Protection

DEPARTMENT OF STATE PARKS AND CULTURAL RESOURCES

2017 Grant Application Workshop Land & Water Conservation Fund (LWCF)

Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program (FRDAP) Please Retain for your Reference ADMINISTRATIVE RULE

Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals National Conference Annapolis, MD, April 13, 2015, 8 am - noon

Arizona Game & Fish (AZGFD) Heritage Fund THE HERITAGE FUND IS MAKING A DIFFERENCE IN YOUR COMMUNITY!

Department of Natural Resources 2013 MRPA CONFERENCE.

Trail Legacy Grants FY2015 Program Manual

Comprehensive Plan 2009

LANE COUNTY PARKS & OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN

Outdoor Recreation Grant Program 2018 Program Manual

Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program Park Legacy Grants

Common Application Questions

Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) 2016 Grant Application Guide

Virginia Growth and Opportunity Fund (GO Fund) Grant Scoring Guidelines

LAND PARTNERSHIPS GRANT PROGRAM. PROGRAM GUIDELINES April 2018

Mt. Stuart Elementary School Property_Background Information on Federal Grant Requirements Provided by Farley Walker, Business Manager.pdf (p.

Parks and Recreation Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission

Great Peninsula Conservancy Strategic Plan November 17, 2015

In Attendance: Appalachian Mountain Club. NH Municipal Association

Matching Incentive Grant Program

Parks & Recreation Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

Community Development Committee Meeting date: December 15, 2014 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of January 14, 2015

Department of Natural Resources Recreation Grant Programs 2017 Workshop.

Project Priority Scoring System Texas Recreation & Parks Account Non-Urban Indoor Recreation Grant Program (Effective May 1, 2014)

Subject: Park Acquisition Opportunity Fund Grant Request for Big Marine Park Reserve (17980 Margo Avenue), Washington County

Instructions for GOCO s 2016 Habitat Restoration Grant Application

Summary of EPF in CFA 2016

Act 13 Impact Fee Revenues Frequently Asked Questions

Task Force Meeting January 12, 2018

Non-Motorized Transportation Funding Options

GUIDELINES FOR THE BUILDING GRANTS ASSISTANCE SCHEME FOR NSW NON GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS APRIL 2014 TABLE OF PROVISIONS

Memorandum. Date: May 13, INFORMATION: Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-Aside Implementation Guidance (Revised by the FAST Act)

U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service. Financial Assistance Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)

Appalachian Forest Heritage Area Conserving Forests & Communities AmeriCorps Sub-Sponsor Request for Proposals Program Year

10/3/2018. PARTF Application Webinar Grant Cycle. PARTF Application Workshop Grant Cycle

The Arizona Game and Fish Department Heritage Grant Application Manual July 3, 2017

Professional Planning Services to Complete Recreation Plan Update

Community Recovery. Pat Forbes Louisiana Office of Community Development

2006 Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund Application Guidelines

LPA Programs How They Work

ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR

FINANCING THE FLOOD. FEMA Public Assistance (PA) and Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs (HMGP) Facilitator: Corey Thomas Thompson Consulting Services

Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians Donation Request Form

Recreational Trails Program

2018 Citizens Institute on Rural Design Application

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

Local Cultural Council Program Guidelines

Appalachian Forest Heritage Area Enhancing Assets to Benefit Communities AmeriCorps Sub-Sponsor Request for Proposals

Sponsor a person or company who makes a donation to CAF of cash or goods & services in exchange for a form of marketing value.

Flip Chart Notes from the 3 Discussion Groups

Park and Recreation Department Strategic Plan Dallas Park and Recreation Board October 1, 2015

Chapter 4 THE SCOUT DISTRICT

Report of the Community Preservation Committee

MEADOWLANDS CONSERVATION TRUST

REGION 5 INFORMATION FOR PER CAPITA AND COMPETITIVE GRANT APPLICANTS Updated April, 2018

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)

8.1 New York State Office Of Parks Recreation & Historic Preservation

Funding Guidelines and Criteria March 2017

Girl Scouts Heart of Central California. Policy Manual. Folsom Trails Service Unit

Military Staff: National Guard and Emergency Management Agency

Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2017) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2017) Application Seminars

FEMA Public & Individual Assistance Programs

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (HHS) GRANT Hospital Preparedness Program. HOSPITAL PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (HPP) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs)

PARISH OF ASCENSION, LOUISIANA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Task Force Meeting September 22, 2017

EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION 1 TRANSPORTATION

Phoenix Suns Charities Competitive Grant Cycle

LEE S SUMMIT, MISSOURI

AMERICA BIKES SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAMS SAFETEA LU VS. MAP 21

Ranken Jordan Pediatric Bridge Hospital Third Party Event Packet

Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Engineering/Architectural/Surveying Services

Rob McKenna ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Consumer Protection Division 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 2000 MS TB 14 Seattle WA (206)

Coastal Resource Enhancement Fund Combined 2018 & 2019 Cycles Application

FREMONT ADVENTURE RECREATION 2018 CONTRIBUTION OPPORTUNITIES

Field Operations Guide. National Organization Section Rules Section Conclave Section Training

Introducing the Renewed Federal Gas Tax Agreement In British Columbia

Chapter 11. Cultural Districts

HOW TO USE THE TRIE. Part Three is narrative, and is not scored.

26,614,000. Article 1 Sec moves to amend H.F. No. 707 as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

HUEY AND ANGELINA WILSON FOUNDATION

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

North Branford Land Conservation Trust

Valley Regional Transit Strategic Plan

Community Grant Guidelines

The ComEd Green Region Program 2018 PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

CARILLION CHARITABLE FUND EMPLOYEE NOMINATION GUIDANCE

City of Hammond Purchasing Department. RFP "Zemurray Park Master Plan"

Five-Year Reflections on the Merger of Points of Light Foundation and Hands On Network

Part IV. Appendix C: Funding Sources

CHAPTER 10 Grant Management

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

ANNEX V Donations Management

Company Profile Phillips & Jordan, Inc. Key Markets

NON-PROFIT EVENT/ATTRACTION GRANT FUND GUIDELINES (June 2014)

TOWN OF LENOX COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE APPLICATION FOR CPA FUNDING

Transcription:

Open Project Selection Process Background: The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) is a Federal assistance program of the National Park Service administered in Louisiana by the Office of State Parks Division of Outdoor Recreation. The LWCF provides matching fund assistance through reimbursement to approved projects for the acquisition of and/or development of outdoor recreation. State agencies and political subdivisions are eligible to apply. The LWCF is not available to non-profits or individuals. Applications are due April 1 st annually. Applications are available on the Louisiana Office of State Parks website (www.crt.state.la.us/louisiana-state-parks/grant-opportunities-for-outdoor-recreation/index). Additional information about the LWCF is also available through the National Park Service website (www.nps.gov/lwcf/index.htm) with detailed information available in the LWCF Manual (www.nps.gov/ncrc/programs/lwcf/manual/lwcf.pdf). The Open Project Selection Process (OPSP) provides objective criteria and standards for grant selection that are explicitly based on each State s priority needs for the acquisition and development of outdoor recreation resources as identified in the Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP). The OPSP is the connection between the SCORP and the use of LWCF grants to assist state efforts in meeting high priority outdoor recreation resource needs. Planning grants and technical assistance are available through the LWCF program to help the States develop and update their SCORP planning process. Louisiana s OPSP is developed in partnership with development of the SCORP. This objective grading criterion applied to all applications seeking assistance ensures projects funded strive to address priorities identified in the SCORP toward meeting the recreational needs of Louisiana s citizens. Initial Eligibility Review: Criteria in this section must be addressed satisfactorily. Any component of this section that is not fully met by the project application must be set aside and cannot be considered for funding: Project sponsor in good standing (no unresolved compliance or administrative issues). Project sponsor will have full control over the entire site within the project boundary and can ensure compliance in perpetuity. Project sponsor has no current active grants. The application submitted is complete with all required documentation and was received within the application deadline. Planning: (15 points maximum) Quality planning for development of appropriate outdoor recreation is essential. The pending application should specifically include documentation pertaining to recreational planning for the entire area served by the proposed sponsor as well as the entire area of the intended project. the application:

Planning - Continued Project sponsor has provided a master plan for the entire region that is under the control of the sponsor. (5 points) The application contains a master plan for the entire area within the provided boundary map for this specific project. (5 points) A development plan for the specific area identified in this project application is included. (5 points) No master plan or development plan is provided. (0 points) Stewardship: (20 points maximum) Project sponsors who have previously received assistance through the LWCF must demonstrate responsible stewardship of existing sites. Good stewardship includes maintenance of the existing facilities, fulfilling compliance standards, maintaining administrative relationships in good standing with state offices and positive promotion of the LWCF program. the project sponsor: All sites under sponsorship of the applicant that have previously received LWCF assistance are in full compliance of LWCF requirements. (5 points) The site identified in this application has previously received LWCF assistance and is in full compliance of LWCF requirements. (5 points) The project sponsor has no prior history of LWCF compliance problems. (5 points) The project sponsor has previously received LWCF assistance and has adequately provided administrative documents without issues. (5 points) The sponsor has a history of LWCF compliance problems or administrative problems. (0 points) Public Involvement: (15 points maximum) Quality LWCF applications reflect the involvement of the general public rather than just individual views. To ensure this, points are awarded to applications that provide full documentation of public engagement in the development of the recreation plans reflected in the application. the project application: The application includes documentation of public meetings, forums and/or surveys reflecting widespread input and support for the proposed project. (5 points) The application includes documentation of residents living within one-mile of the proposed site offering support for the proposed project. (5 points) The application identifies public fundraising efforts to provide financial input toward realization of the proposed project. (5 points) The application provides no identification of public involvement in the development of the project. (0 points)

Funding Mix: (15 points maximum) Full identification of the financial resources needed to fully meet the goals identified in the application is essential. Project sponsors must be prepared to meet their share of the matching funds necessary to achieve the goals identified in the application. If a combination of funding sources is used, only the highest scoring funding source is counted, but that funding source must provide at least 50% of the sponsor s investment in the project. Matching funds for this sponsor are from monies collected through a public fund drive. (15 points) Matching funds for this sponsor are from the value of donated property. (10 points) Matching funds for this sponsor are from monies received through a private grant. (9 points) Matching funds for this sponsor are achieved through in kind services. (8 points) Matching funds for this sponsor are from monies received through a tax millage. (7 points) Matching funds for this sponsor are from monies received through a state capital outlay. (6 points) Matching funds for this sponsor are from monies received through a Federal grant that can be used to match LWCF funds. (5 points) Matching funds for this sponsor are from monies identified in the sponsor s general fund budget. (4 points) No matching fund source is identified. (0 points) Maintenance Capacity: (5 points maximum) Project sponsors must fully identify the means by which they have the capacity to provide ongoing maintenance of the project site. The sponsor must also identify the capacity and willingness to ensure the project site will remain an outdoor recreation asset to the public in perpetuity. the project application: The sponsor has a dedicated recreation maintenance department, which has been fully identified in the application. (2 points) The sponsor has a public works department which has been identified in the application as responsible for ongoing site maintenance. (2 points) The sponsor has identified another resource with responsibility for ongoing maintenance of the site. (1 point) Fairness: (10 points maximum) LWCF assistance is limited and subject to the Federal budget cycle and apportionment to the State. All efforts must be made to fairly distribute assistance to provide quality outdoor recreation to all citizens of the State. Per capita funding levels are determined by dividing the amount of funding provided to locally sponsored projects in a given parish by the parish population based on the latest available census figures. (Ex: East Baton Rouge has received $3,729,989.60 in LWCF assistance divided by the 2013 census of 445,227 equals $8.38 in LWCF assistance per capita). The Louisiana average is $15.69 per capita.

Fairness - Continued The Parish in which the project is proposed has received less than $5 per capita in LWCF assistance through the history of the program through locally sponsored projects. (10 points) The Parish in which the project is proposed has received less $5 - $10 per capita in LWCF assistance through the history of the program through locally sponsored projects. (5 points) The Parish in which the project is proposed has received $10 - $15 per capita in LWCF assistance through the history of the program through locally sponsored projects. (3 points) The Parish in which the project is proposed has received $15 - $20 per capita in LWCF assistance through the history of the program through locally sponsored projects. (1 point) The Parish in which the project is proposed has received $20 or more per capita in LWCF assistance through the history of the program through locally sponsored projects. (minus 5 points) Low Income Areas: (5 points maximum) Special emphasis is placed on providing facilities to areas that support recreation for low income groups. The application specifically identifies how the project will provide recreation for low income groups. (5 points) Special Needs: (10 points maximum) Recreational infrastructure developed to provide facilities to support individuals with special needs and facilities to support disabilities are greatly needed beyond required meeting of standards identified through the Americans with Disabilities Act. Recreation identified in this application is specifically designed to provide for individuals with special needs and/or disabilities. (10 points) Recreation identified in this application specifically identifies some facilities that are for individuals with special needs and/or disabilities. (5 points) The project does not specifically identify facilities that are designed for individuals with special needs and/or disabilities. (0 points) Natural Disasters: (5 points) Recovery of recreational facilities and/or development of new recreational facilities in the aftermath of a natural disaster are essential in overcoming the impact of such a catastrophe. The application is for a project in a Parish that has been declared a Federal natural disaster area within the last five years. (5 points)

Addressing SCORP Priorities: (20 points maximum) Projects receiving LWCF assistance must strive to meet priorities identified in the latest SCORP. These priorities were identified through significant research and reflect the most important outdoor recreation development needed to meet the needs of the citizens of our state. These priorities are included on page 96 of the current SCORP. Project addresses the highest SCORP priority - trails. (20 points) Project addresses the 2 nd ranked SCORP priority public water access. (18 points) Project addresses the 3 rd ranked SCORP priority land acquisition. (16 points) Project addresses the 4 th ranked SCORP priority camping. (14 points) Project addresses the 5 th ranked SCORP priority playgrounds and picnic areas. (12 points) Project addresses the SCORP identified priority not among the top 5, but identified as a recreational need within the SCORP. (10 points) The project does not address one of the top 10 SCORP priorities. (0 points) Land Acquisition: (5 points) A high priority for the LWCF is the acquisition of land and dedication of that land to outdoor recreation in perpetuity. The project acquires land that has not previously been dedicated or operated for outdoor recreation purposes through purchase or an act of donation. (5 points) Innovation: (5 points) Breaking new ground in recreational development is important for the future of the LWCF. The project proposal is innovative in design and development potential. (5 points) Bonus: (5 points) Each funding cycle includes projects that offer great recreational quality for the LWCF, but are not funded solely due to the lack of available monies through the budget cycle. The project was submitted in the preceding funding year, but was not approved only due to the lack of available LWCF monies. (5 points)