A Ready, Modern Force!

Similar documents
Strategic Choices. Strategic Choices

Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157)

FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK

BUDGET BRIEF Senator McCain and Outlining the FY18 Defense Budget

MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018

Challenges and opportunities Trends to address New concepts for: Capability and program implications Text

Standard Missile: Snapshots in Time Captured by Previous Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest Articles

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH? ALTERNATIVE DEFENSE STRATEGIES EDITED BY JACOB COHN AND RYAN BOONE FOREWORD BY THOMAS G. MAHNKEN

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Winning in Close Combat Ground Forces in Multi-Domain Battle

DEFENSE BUDGET PRIORITIES AND CHOICES FISCAL YEAR 2014

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY AND GENERAL MARK A. MILLEY CHIEF OF STAFF UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE

SAF/FMB FEBRUARY 2018 UNITED STATES AIR FORCE FISCAL YEAR 2019 BUDGET OVERVIEW

FORWARD, READY, NOW!

INTRODUCTION. From New Strategic Guidance to Budget Choices

Missile Defense: Time to Go Big

Fiscal Year 2017 President s Budget Request for the DoD Science & Technology Program April 12, 2016

Praeger, 2008). 1 Dennis M. Gormley, Missile Contagion: Cruise Missile Proliferation and the Threat to International Security (Santa Barbara, CA:

Providing for the Common Defense A Promise Kept to the American Taxpayer

Prepared Remarks for the Honorable Richard V. Spencer Secretary of the Navy Defense Science Board Arlington, VA 01 November 2017

WHITE PAPER AIR FORCE ORGANIZATIONAL PRINCIPLES

Trusted Partner in guided weapons

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002

Strategic Cost Reduction

Current Budget Issues

Development of the Dynamic Defense Force

Su S rface Force Strategy Return to Sea Control

Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 2

Re-Shaping Distributed Operations: The Tanking Dimension

Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

February 11, 2015 STATEMENT BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE "ALTERNATIVE BUDGETS AND STRATEGIC CHOICES"

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET REQUEST

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Aircraft Procurement Plan Fiscal Years (FY) Submitted with the FY 2012 Budget

Anti-Access/Area Denial Challenges

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

The Air Force View of IAMD in a Joint Environment

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

FY18 President s Budget Request

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION

Fighter/ Attack Inventory

CRS Report for Congress

Unmanned Systems & Robotics in the FY2019 Defense Budget

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

Amphibious Landings in the 21 st Century

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910

CAPT Heide Stefanyshyn-Piper

17 th ITEA Engineering Workshop: System-of-Systems in a 3rd Offset Environment: Way Forward

FY19 President s Budget Request

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

The Cruise Missile Threat: Prospects for Homeland Defense

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. Investor Briefing. March 2018 NASDAQ: KTOS 1

First Announcement/Call For Papers

SUMMARY OF MID-TERM DEFENSE PROGRAM (FY2011-FY2015)

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Executing Navy s Maritime Strategy

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL WILLIAM F. MORAN U.S. NAVY VICE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATE OF THE MILITARY

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENS E (PUBLIC AFFAIRS )

Legislative Report. President s Budget Request for Fiscal Year 2018 OVERVIEW. As of June 8, 2017

9/13/2017. Making (Some) Sense of the DoD Budget AGENDA. Ron Houle HOW WE GOT HERE. Change in administration. Alphabet Soup BCA BBA CR Base OCO

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES

Analysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

BUDGET UNCERTAINTY AND MISSILE DEFENSE

Iran's Military Forces and Warfighting Capabilities

DIVISION A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I PROCUREMENT

WikiLeaks Document Release

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

To THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE

WINNING THE SALVO COMPETITION

Navy & Marine Corps Vertical Lift: Past and Future

FY18 Defense Appropriations Act

Logbook Navy Perspective on Joint Force Interdependence Navigating Rough Seas Forging a Global Network of Navies

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES. for FY 2011 and beyond

SIMULEX People s Republic of China Military Forces in 2017

TESTIMONY STATEMENT BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE ON RESHAPING THE MILITARY. February 16, 2017

Defense Policies of Countries

Beyond Phase II Conference RIF Overview

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2016 PRESIDENT S BUDGET

Littoral OpTech West Workshop

Annual Aviation Inventory and Funding Plan. Fiscal Years (FY)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Impact of the War on Terrorism on the USAF

Setting Priorities for Nuclear Modernization. By Lawrence J. Korb and Adam Mount February

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

mm*. «Stag GAO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE Information on Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and Other Theater Missile Defense Systems 1150%

RESTORING AMERICAN POWER

Chapter 13 Air and Missile Defense THE AIR THREAT AND JOINT SYNERGY

DRAFT vea Target: 15 min, simultaneous translation Littoral OpTech East VADM Aucoin Keynote Address 1 Dec 2015 Grand Hotel Ichigaya

Overview. Vision Guiding Principles Across the FYDP FY15 President s Budget (PB) Request FY15 Opportunity, Growth and Security Initiatives

International and Regional Threats Posed by the LAWS: Russian Perspective

Transcription:

A Ready, Modern Force! READY FOR TODAY, PREPARED FOR TOMORROW! Jerry Hendrix, Paul Scharre, and Elbridge Colby!

The Center for a New American Security does not! take institutional positions on policy issues.!! Accordingly, all views, positions, and conclusions expressed! in this brief should be understood to be solely those of! Jerry Hendrix, Paul Scharre, and Elbridge Colby.! 2!

Our Team s Strategy! Maintain readiness for today s threats.! Modernize the force for emerging challenges.! 3!

A Ready, Modern, Balanced Force! Restore readiness (flying hours, depot maintenance).! Invest in emerging technologies (cyber, robotics, directed energy, human performance, etc.).! Field a diverse high-low mix of forces to cover the full range of missions most effectively and efficiently.! 4!

Predictable But Restrained Budget! $ Do it all within a 2% increase in defense spending over PB17 levels. 5!

Budget Top-Line in Perspective! 750 Enacted (base + OCO) DOD Discretionary Budget Authority (FY17 dollars in billions) Dolars in Billions (FY 2017 constant dollars) 700 650 600 550 500 450 Enacted (base) PB12 (base) PB17 (OCO) PB17 (base) Our Team (base) 400 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027

Our Team s Force is Prepared to! Defend the homeland against terrorist, missile, and cyber attacks.! Project power globally into anti-access areas.! Deter and defeat regional aggression.! Maintain a stabilizing presence abroad.! Sustain our nuclear deterrent.! 7!

U.S. Navy! Grew the fleet by 28% from 272 ships to 350 in 10 years.! Increased undersea strike capacity increased from 58 to 74 submarines, adding 680 cruise missile tubes.! Invested in new technologies uninhabited (unmanned) systems, directed energy, electromagnetic rail gun, & high velocity projectile.! Invested in lower-cost commercial derivative ships (black hulls) as expeditionary sea bases to expand overall expeditionary lift capacity.! Reduced legacy high-cost, low-value assets for A2/AD environments terminated Ford- and America-class carrier production lines and curtailed LPD/LSD fleet.! 8!

U.S. Air Force! Increased:! Overall Air Force TACAIR inventory by +180 aircraft by using a high-low mix.! Stealthy bombers by +44% with an increased B-21 buy.! Developed new stealthy uninhabited combat air vehicle (UCAV).! Additional KC-130J tankers for distributed operations inside A2/AD areas.!! Procured advanced munitions (JASSM-ER, SDB II, LRASM, MALD-J, new long-range air-to-air missile, collaborative munitions, upgraded PNT).! Invested in new technologies high-energy lasers, high-powered microwave weapons (CHAMP), and distributed aerial swarms (Gremlins).! Preserved airlift and non-stealthy uninhabited ISR.! Funded investments by:! Reducing non-stealthy bombers (retired 60 B-1 bombers).! Trimming F-35A quantities by 60 aircraft over 10 years.! 9!

U.S. Army and Marine Corps! Preserved active-duty Army end-strength at ~450,000.! Rebalanced from light infantry to armor, precision fires, missile defense, and electronic warfare.! Increased active-duty armor BCTs from 9 to 12.! Cut 5 active-duty USMC battalions in keeping with decreased amphibious lift capacity.! Invested in robotic logistics (ground and air) to save costs.! Preserved regeneration capacity in Advise and Assist Brigades.! Cut U.S. Army Reserves by 11% and USMC by 5%.! 10!

Strategic Systems! Modernized the nuclear triad and invested in enhanced C2.!! Increased space resiliency and airborne layer C2 & PNT.! Increased strategic cyber offense & defense.! Increased missile defense:! Additional THAAD (+2) and Patriot (+2) batteries.! +40 additional ground-based interceptors (GBIs).! Deployed game-changing technologies: electromagnetic rail gun and high velocity projectiles (HVP).! 11!

Combat-Credible Forward Presence! +2 Armored BCTs +1 Stryker BCT +1 Combat Aviation Brigade +2 Carriers + Attack Submarines + Destroyers 12!

Base Resiliency and Access! Increased capabilities for airfield dispersal, rapid runway repair, and at-sea VLS rearming.! Invested $2B on improving partner bases for U.S. access and logistics.! Added SOF regional hubs for rapid access in high-threat regions.! 13!

Restored Readiness! Restored readiness damaged by BCA cuts by increasing funding above PB17 levels for:! Flying hours! Depot maintenance! 14!

Increased R&D! Increased R&D spending by $24 billion over 10 years to capitalize on emerging technologies:! Advanced weapons: railgun, hypersonics, high-energy lasers! Electronic warfare, cyber, networking, PNT! Advanced undersea and aerospace techonlogies! Artificial intelligence and human performance! Increased DARPA agency funding.! 15!

Building Partner Capacity! Invested in capabilities to build partner capacity:! Expanded security force assistance training. Created 2 Advise and Assist Brigades (3000 personnel). Created a light attack squadron to train partners in low-end air capabilities. Increased SOF language training. 16!

Management Efficiencies! Saved $55B over 10 years by cutting 5% of DOD civilian workforce and 8,000 contractors.! Cuts made possible by HQ de-layering, automation of jobs, and process efficiencies.! Trimmed additional $27B over 10 years by initiating BRAC, eliminating commissary subsidies, and raising TRICARE fees.! 17!

The Center for a New American Security does not! take institutional positions on policy issues.!! Accordingly, all views, positions, and conclusions! expressed in this brief should be understood to be! solely those of the authors.! 18!