CME Disclosure. HCAHPS- Hardwiring Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success. Accreditation Statement. Designation of Credit.

Similar documents
HCAHPS. Presented by: Bill Sexton. Proudly recognized as one of the Nation s Top 100 Critical Access Hospitals - ivantage Health Analytics

Objectives. Integrating Performance Improvement with Publicly Reported Quality Metrics, Value-Based Purchasing Incentives and ISO 9001/9004

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Measures (Calendar Year 2012 Discharges - Revised)

Value Based Purchasing

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

August 1, 2012 (202) CMS makes changes to improve quality of care during hospital inpatient stays

Value-based incentive payment percentage 3

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

The dawn of hospital pay for quality has arrived. Hospitals have been reporting

Improving quality of care during inpatient hospital stays

National Patient Safety Goals & Quality Measures CY 2017

Value Based Purchasing: Improving Healthcare Outcomes Using the Right Incentives

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Medicare Value-Based Purchasing for Hospitals: A New Era in Payment

Thursday, October 11, 2012 Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center Nashville, TN

CMS in the 21 st Century

State of the State: Hospital Performance in Pennsylvania October 2015

Quality Care Amongst Clinical Commotion: Daily Challenges in the Care Environment

Connecting the Revenue and Reimbursement Cycles

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Hospital Compare Quality Measures: 2008 National and Florida Results for Critical Access Hospitals

P4P Programs 9/13/2013. Medicare P4P Programs. Medicaid P4P Programs

Value-Based Purchasing & Payment Reform How Will It Affect You?

IMPROVING HCAHPS, PATIENT MORTALITY AND READMISSION: MAXIMIZING REIMBURSEMENTS IN THE AGE OF HEALTHCARE REFORM

Clinical Documentation: Beyond The Financials Cheryll A. Rogers, RHIA, CDIP, CCDS, CCS Senior Inpatient Consultant 3M HIS Consulting Services

Model VBP FY2014 Worksheet Instructions and Reference Guide

1. Recommended Nurse Sensitive Outcome: Adult inpatients who reported how often their pain was controlled.

An Overview of the. Measures. Reporting Initiative. bwinkle 11/12

Facility State National

Executing a Patient Experience Measurement Initiative

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Medicare Payment Strategy

CMS Quality Program- Outcome Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: December 2015 Revised: January 2018

FY 2014 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Proposed Rule

Dianne Feeney, Associate Director of Quality Initiatives. Measurement

Analysis of Final Rule for FY 2009 Revisions to the Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System

New Mexico Hospital Association

The Patient Experience at Florida Hospital Learning Module for Students

Our Hospital s Value Based Purchasing (VBP) Journey

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Olutoyin Abitoye, MD Attending, Department of Internal Medicine Virtua Medical Group New Jersey,USA

Innovative Coordinated Care Delivery

The Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project (MBQIP) Monthly Performance Improvement Call

FY 2014 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Provisions Webinar

The Wave of the Future: Value-Based Purchasing & the Impact of Quality Reporting Within the Revenue Cycle

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

Person-Centered Care and Population Health

The 5 W s of the CMS Core Quality Process and Outcome Measures

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

Accreditation, Quality, Risk & Patient Safety

(202) or CMS Proposals to Improve Quality of Care during Hospital Inpatient Stays

Understanding HSCRC Quality Programs and Methodology Updates

Hospital Acquired Conditions: using ACS-NSQIP to drive performance. J Michael Henderson Jackie Matthews Nirav Vakharia

Medicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Star Rating Method for Single and Composite Measures

Inpatient Quality Reporting Program

Reimbursement Policy Subject: Present on Admission Indicator for Health Care-Acquired Conditions 06/01/12 05/02/16 Administration Policy

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

How the compliance department can support quality of care initiatives

Rural-Relevant Quality Measures for Critical Access Hospitals

Reimbursement Policy Subject: Present on Admission Indicator for Health Care-Acquired Conditions 04/01/14 Administration 05/02/16

Reimbursement Policy Subject: Present on Admission Indicator for Health Care-Acquired Conditions 01/01/14 Administration 05/02/16

Impacting Quality Initiatives through Documentation Improvement. Fran Jurcak, MSN, RN, CCDS Vice President of Clinical Innovation Iodine Software

Disclosure of Proprietary Interest

FINAL RECOMMENDATION REGARDING MODIFYING THE QUALITY- BASED REIMBURSEMENT INITIATIVE AFTER STATE FY 2010

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

Scoring Methodology FALL 2017

Discharge Information

HCAHPS Doctor Communication: Excelling in The New Reality of Performance

2014 Inova Fairfax Medical Campus Quality Report

Copyright 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

To Admit or Not to Admit: How Do We Answer this Question?

Program Summary. Understanding the Fiscal Year 2019 Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. Page 1 of 8 July Overview

Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2012

CME Disclosure. Accreditation Statement. Designation of Credit. Disclosure Policy

MEDICARE BENEFICIARY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MBQIP)

Performance Scorecard 2013

Exhibit A Virginia Quantitative Measures

PASSPORT ecare NEXT AND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

Mastering the Mandatory Elements of the Affordable Care Act. Melinda Hancock Walter Coleman

CMS Value Based Purchasing: The Wave of the Future

Provider Preventable Conditions: Health Care Acquired Conditions and Present on Admission Policy

SCORING METHODOLOGY APRIL 2014

Learning Objectives. Medicare P4P Programs. How to Interpret Medicare s Hospital Pay for Performance Reports

Value based Purchasing Legislation, Methodology, and Challenges

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated September 2012

HOSPITAL QUALITY MEASURES. Overview of QM s

MBQIP Quality Measure Trends, Data Summary Report #20 November 2016

Surgeon Champion: Getting Started, What You Need to Know

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (At a Glance)

Scoring Methodology FALL 2016

National Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual

Patient Experience & Satisfaction

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

Quality and Health Care Reform: How Do We Proceed?

GHS Quality and Safety Report

HACs, Readmissions and VBP: Hospital Strategies for Turning Lemons into Lemonade

Transcription:

CME Disclosure Accreditation Statement Studer Group is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. Designation of Credit Studer Group designates this educational event for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the educational event. Disclosure Policy Quint Studer and Brian Robinson have disclosed that they do not have any relevant financial relationships with any commercial interests related to the content of this educational event. HCAHPS- Hardwiring Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success Presented by: Quint Studer and Brian Robinson 1

Webinar Objectives How your HCAHPS results will impact your organization s reimbursement in the era of health reform Why HCAHPS results are a quality metric, not just a patient satisfaction metric How to identify the clinical outcomes you most need to focus on to improve HCAHPS results and overall quality of care Why ED performance is directly connected to HCAHPS results Why nurse communication is the single most critical composite on the HCAHPS survey Tactics you can implement right now that have a powerful positive impact on HCAHPS results and on your entire organization. Studer Group Partners Outperform the Nation across HCAHPS Composites Studer Group Difference over Non Partners in National Percentile Ranking Overall Rating 20 Willingness to Recommend 18 Pain Management 17 Nursing Communication Communication of Medications Discharge Information 8 14 16 percentile points higher Roomand BathroomCleanliness 7 Doctor Communication 6 Quiet at night 4 Responsiveness of Staff 4 Studer Group Difference over Non Partners 0 in National 5 Percentile 10 Ranking 15 20 25 Source: The graph above shows a comparison of the average percentile rank for Studer Group Partners that have received EBL coaching since Oct 2007 and non partners for each composite; updated 3.11.11 using 2Q09 1Q10 CMS data 2

Studer Group Partners Outpace the Nation in HCAHPS Improvements Average Change in Top Box Results in One Year Studer Group Partners vs. Non Partners Overall Rating Willingness to Recommend Nursing Communication Communication of Medications Discharge Information Room and Bathroom Cleanliness Doctor Communication Quiet at night Responsiveness of Staff 0.59 0.98 1.57 1.17 1.45 1.25 1.56 1.22 1.28 1.69 1.53 1.65 1.28 1.86 1.85 1.77 2.09 257 2.57 Avg Change One Year 2Q08 1Q09 to 2Q09 1Q10 0.5 SG Partners 1 Avg Change 1.5 One Year 2Q08 1Q09 2 to 2Q09 1Q10 2.5 NonPartners3 Source: The graph compares the change In one year in top box results achieved by Studer Group partners vs. non partners. Change is from 2Q08 1Q09 to 2Q09 1Q10. The top box is the most positive response to HCAHPS survey questions. As Hospital s ED Percentile Ranking Increases, So Does Its HCAHPS Overall Percentile Ranking 3

Studer Group Partners Perform Better Than the Nation in All Core Measures 100% 90% Studer Group Partners vs. National Average in Compliance with Evidence Based Clinical Core Processes 90.0% 87.6% 93.9% 94.5% 91.4% 89.0% 96.1% 93.5% 83.3% 80% 78.6% 70% Children's Asthma Heart Attack or Chest Pain Heart Failure Pneumonia Surgical Care Improvement Project National Average SG Avg (EBL Since Oct 2007) Value Based Purchasing FY 2013: Proposal 1% Base operating DRG payments 17 Core Measures (* 70% Weight) HCAHPS (* 30% Weight) Performance attainment and improvement will determine total hospital reimbursement Notes: Implementation FY 2013 (October 2012) *Value Based Purchasing Program proposed rule 1.7.11 4

What Will Value-Based Purchasing Mean for You? 17 Clinical i l Process Core Measures HCAHPS 8 Value Based Purchasing Mea asures HCAHPS COMPOSITES AND QUESTIONS Composite Question Summary Response Scale Nurse courtesy and respect Nursing Nurses listen carefully Communication Nurse explanations are clear Doctor courtesy and respect Doctor Doctors listen carefully Communication Doctor explanations are clear Did you need help in getting to bathroom? 2 Yes No (screening question) Responsiveness of Staff helped with bathroom needs Staff Call button answered Did you need medicine for pain? 2 Yes, No (screening question) Pain Management Pain well controlled Staff helped patient with pain Were you given any new meds? Communication of Yes, No (screening question) Staff explained medicine Medications Staff clearly described side effects Did you go home, someone else s home, or to Own home, Someone else s home, Discharge another facility? 2 Another facility (screening question) Information Staff discussed help need after discharge YES, No Written symptom/health info provided YES, No Cleanliness and Area around room kept quiet at night Quietness of Hospital Environment Room and bathroom kept clean 0 to 10 point scale (percent 9 and 10 Overall Rating Hospital Rating Question reported) Willingness to Recommend will continue to DEFINITELY YES, Probably Yes, Willingness to Recommend be reported but not included in VBP formula Probably No, Definitely No 5

17 Core Quality Measures Value Based Purchasing FY 2013: Proposal Core Quality Measures Selected 3 Heart Attack (Aspirin; Fibrinolytic w/i 30 min s; PCI w/i 90 min s) 3 Heart Failure (Dx instruct; LVS func; ACEI or ARB for LVSD) 4 Pneumonia (P/I-Vac; culture in ED w/o anti; CAP immuno pt) 7 Surgical Care: Infection and Improvement Proph anti w/i1 hr of incision Proph anti selection-surg Proph anti Dx w/i 24 hrs of surg Cardiac pts-6am post-op serum glucose Beta blocker prior to arrival if received during period Recommended Venous Thromboembolism proph ordered Venous Thromboembolism proph w/i 24 hrs prior and post What s the possible risk? Impact: Hospital Profile: 1% impact base operating 376 bed hospital DRG payments = $2,835,000 32 bed ED 30%* attributed to HCAHPS Inpatient Revenue: performance = $850,500 $630 million potential risk Payor mix: 70%* attributed to Core 45% Medicare Measure performance = $1,984,500 potential risk *Value Based Purchasing Program proposed rule 1.7.11. 6

Pay for Performance is Here Now* *Performance Period is July 1, 2011 March 31, 2012 VBP Proposed Calculation of Performance: Reimbursement Baseline period: July 1, 2009 March 31, 2010 Performance period: July 1, 2011 March 31, 2012 Hospital performance: the higher of an achievement score in the performance period or the improvement score as compared to the score in the baseline period To incentivize HCAHPS consistency points will be added in determining total performance. 7

Value-Based Purchasing Proposal - FY2014 Hospital Acquired Condition Measures (FY 2014) 1. Foreign Object Retained After Surgery 2. Air Embolism 3. Blood Incompatibility 4. Pressure Ulcer Stages III and IV 5. Falls and Trauma: (Includes: Fracture, Dislocation, Intracranial Injury, Crushing Injury, Burn, Electric Shock) 6. Vascular Catheter-Associated Infections 7. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) 8. Manifestations of Poor Glycemic Control Mortality Measures (FY 2014) 1. Mortality -30-AMI: Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-day Mortality Rate 2. Mortality -30-HF: Heart Failure (HF) 30-day Mortality Rate 3. Mortality -30-PN: Pneumonia (PN) 30-day Mortality Rate Value-Based Purchasing Proposal - FY2014 Patient Safety Indicators (FY 2014) PSI 06 Iatrogenic pneumothorax, adult PSI 11 Post Operative Respiratory Failure PSI 12 Post Operative PE or DVT PSI 14 Post Operative wound dehiscence PSI 15 Accidental puncture or laceration IQI 11 Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair mortality rate (with or without volume) IQI 19 Hip fracture mortality rate Complication/patient safety for selected indicators (composite) Mortality for selected medical conditions (composite) 8

HCAHPS Fundamentals and Tactics As Hospital s ED Percentile Ranking Increases, So Does Its HCAHPS Overall Percentile Ranking 9

The Fundamentals: What You Must Know to Improve Your HCAHPS Results Nurse Leader Rounding AIDET SM Key Words Post Visit Calls Chapter Two: HCAHPS Handbook; The Fundamentals: What You Must Know to Improve Your HCAHPS Scores; pgs 23 44 Nursing Communication: The Most Bang for Your Buck The Nursing Communication Composite is the one most highly correlated with overall hospital rating. 1. During this hospital stay, how often did nurses treat you with courtesy and respect? 2. During this hospital stay, how often did nurses listen carefully to you? 3. During this hospital stay, how often did nurses explain things in a way you could understand? 10

Nurse Leader Rounding Impacts Patients Perception of Nursing Quality Increase in Percentile Ranking for HCAHPS Composite Nursing Communication Following Implementation of Nurse Leader Rounding Nursing Communication Composite Percentile Point Improvement 10 25 SG Partners Average Percentile Rank Improvement Non Partners Average Percentile Rank Improvement Note: When Studer Group Partners implement nurse leader rounding, they improve by an average of 25 percentile points for the Nursing Communication composite. Leader Rounding on Patients Did a Nurse Manager Visit You During Your Stay? n= 608 n= 604 n= 561 n= 601 Tactic and Tool Implemented: Leader Rounding on Patient n= 106 n= 104 n= 96 n= 105 Source: Arizona Hospital, Total beds = 355, Employees = 4,000, Admissions = 10,188; updated 2Q2010 11

Rounding with Patients and Families Set expectations/validate Behavior Align Questions to Fit Desired Outcomes of the Organization Identify patient and family needs Document needs Give instructions on what to do if they do not get the care they expect Explain any post visit calls or surveys Recognize and Coach Staff Studer Group Five Fundamentals AIDET SM A Acknowledge I D E T Introduce Duration Explanation Thank You 12

AIDET SM Impact on Safety and Quality Change in Percentile Ranks Ease of obtaining test results (60.0%) CP instructions for follow up care (80.0%) CP information about medications (73.5%) CP efforts to include in decisions (73.3%) CP concern for prob/condition (84.2%) Access to care (46.5%) Overall Patient Satisfaction Perception (53.0%) Post AIDET Pre AIDET 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percentile Rank Source: Oklahoma University; OUP Hematology/Oncology Clinic & Infusion Center; 10 providers & 22 staff, take care of 15,000 clinic visits & 10,000 chemotherapy infusions per year Studer Group Five Fundamentals AIDET SM A Acknowledge Focus on the A & I to show courtesy and respect by all physicians, nurses and staff. Focus on the E to explain medications and diagnosis. I D E T Introduce Duration Explanation Thank You 13

Post Visit Calls: Clinical Quality Source: New Jersey Hospital, Total beds = 775; 3Q2007 4Q2010 Post-Visit Phone Call Sample Empathy and Concern Clinical Outcomes Reward and Recognition Service Process Improvement Appreciation Mrs. Smith? Hello. This is <name>. You were discharged from my unit yesterday. I just wanted to call and see how you re doing today Do you have any questions regarding your medications or any possible side effects? Have you filled your prescription yet? How is your pain now compared to when you were in the hospital? We want to make sure we do excellent clinical follow up to ensure your best possible recovery. Do you know what symptoms or health problems to look out for? Do you have your follow up appointment?... Mrs. Smith, we like to recognize our employees. Who did an excellent job for you while you were in the hospital?... Can you tell me why Sue was excellent?... We want to make sure you received excellent care. How were we, Mrs. Smith?... We re always looking to get better. Do you have any suggestions for what we could do to be even better?... (could add in questions regarding quality indicators such as hand washing, ID band check, etc.) We appreciate you taking the time this afternoon to speak with us about your follow up care. Is there anything else I can do for you?... 14

Always bring it back to values... Quint Studer Healthcare Flywheel Prescriptive To Do s Purpose, worthwhile work and making a difference Bottom Line Results (Transparency and Accountability) WHY Self- Motivation 15

The HCAHPS Handbook Hardwire Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success This book shares the essential tactics proven to dramatically improve, and sustain, HCAHPS results and position your hospital to maximize i reimbursement. /HCAHPS How To Acquire CME Certificate You must take the survey before you can download your CME Certificate To take the survey, visit /webinar1 After you submit survey, we will email you your certificate. Thank you! 16

Thank You To learn more about Studer Group, visit 17