DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER NAVY REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER 9170 SECOND STREET, SUITE 245 NORFOLK, VA

Similar documents
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER NAVY REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER 9170 SECOND STREET, SUITE 245 NORFOLK, VA

CNRMCINST Code Jun 13. Subj: CONDITION FOUND REPORT (CFR) AND LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL (LOT)

CNRMC PSSRA Brief. Mr. Kevin Taylor May 19, 2016

DEPARTMENTOFTHENAVY COMMANDER, REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTERS 9170 SECOND STREET, SUITE 245 NORFOLK, VA

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER NAVY REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER 9170 SECOND STREET, SUITE 245 NORFOLK, VA

Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Command

Ship Maintenance: Provider Perspective. VADM Paul Sullivan Naval Sea Systems Command

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER NAVY REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER 9170 SECOND STREET, SUITE 245 NORFOLK, VA

OPNAVINST G N09P 17 Jul Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION AND SURVEY

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY. Ref: (a) SECNAV Washington DC Z Jul 2005 (ALNAV 055/05)

ASSESSMENT DIRECTOR (AD)

OPNAVINST DNS 25 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND

Opportunities for Enlisted Women in Submarines

STRATEGIC ARMS REDUCTION TREATY (START) COMPLIANCE AND IMPLEMENTATION

DEPARTMENT 0~ THE NAVY COMMANDER! NAVY REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER 9170 SECOND STREET, SUITE 245 NORFOLK, VA

Depot Contributions to Weapons Readiness

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE UNITED STATES PACIFIC FLEET 2841 RENDOVA ROAD SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

OPNAVINST F N4 5 Jun 2012

(1) Annual command history of USS LOS ANGELES (SSN 688) for the period 1 January 1986 through 31 December 1986 (2) Summary of Operations 1986

DCN: Industrial Joint Cross Service Group

5720 Ser056. (3 ) Narrative (4) USS MICHIGAN History (5) Ship's Picture (6) Commanding Officer's Biography and picture. 5 Mar 96

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

4 Aug 92. Encl: From: Commanding Officer, USS MICHIGAN (SSBN 727) To: Director of Naval History (0-09BH), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20374

SMALL BUSINESS PROFESSIONALS LIST FOR NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND

From: Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center (CNRMC) Subj: GUIDANCE AND POLICY FOR EXPANDED PROCESS CONTROL PROCEDURES (EPCP)

Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF UNITED STATES FLEET FORCES COMMAND

OPNAVINST E N97 7 Nov 2017

JOINT FLEET MAINTENANCE MANUAL VOLUME III DEPLOYED MAINTENANCE LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES. Page Numbers Change in Effect Page Numbers Change in Effect

NAVY WEIGHT HANDLING PROGRAM FOR SHORE ACTIVITIES

OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU Of MEDICINE AND SURGERY 2300 E STREET NW WASHINGTON DC IH REPlY REf R 10

RTTUZYUW RHHMHAA UUUU--RHMCSUU. ZNR UUUUU R Z OCT 17 ZYB FM COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI TO COMSEVENTHFLT COMNAVSURFPAC SAN DIEGO CA

1. Enclosures (1) throuqh (6) are forwarded, per reference (a). ad hkil

Chapter 1 SUPSHIP Mission and Organization

Subj: SURFACE SHIP AND SUBMARINE SURVIVABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

Navy, Range, and Infrastructure Mission Area

NAVY SHIP MAINTENANCE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 7 USS MICHIGAN (SSBN 727) / FW AP

US Navy Strategic Maintenance Process

OPNAVNOTE 1530 Ser N1/15U Jun 2015 OPNAV NOTICE From: Chief of Naval Operations. Subj: 2015 MIDSHIPMAN SUMMER TRAINING PLAN

OPNAVNOTE 1530 N12/16U Apr 2016 OPNAV NOTICE From: Chief of Naval Operations. Subj: 2016 MIDSHIPMAN SUMMER TRAINING PLAN

BRAC Commissioner Turner Visit. Naval Submarine Base New London Wednesday 27 July 2005

OPNAVINST A N Oct 2014

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 0HICfOI 1111 CIIIEHII "\\\ \LOI'I RAIIO'I,\ N \\ \ 1'1 'T\C:O'I, \\ASIIIM:TOI\, DC ()

DEPARTMENT 20 OVERVIEW AND CONTRACTS FORECAST

SECNAVINST B ASN (RDA) 22 Dec 2005 PRODUCT DATA REPORTING AND EVALUATION PROGRAM (PDREP)

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

OPNAVINST B N96 29 Jul 2014

Commander Submarine Forces. Vice Admiral Joe Tofalo Commander, Submarine Forces

GAO MILITARY READINESS. Navy Needs to Assess Risks to Its Strategy to Improve Ship Readiness. Report to Congressional Committees

CERTIFICATION OF THE AVIATION CAPABILITY OF SHIPS OPERATING AIRCRAFT

OPNAVINST B N98 4 Jun 2018

Subj: SECRETARY OF THE NAVY SAFETY EXCELLENCE AWARDS

MEMORANDUM FOR ACTING UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS)

OPNAVINST DNS-H 15 Aug 2014

Canc frp: Nov OPNAVNOTE 5450 Ser DNS-33/5U December 29, 2005

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NUCLEAR WEAPON SYSTEM SAFETY PROGRAM

NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE

Subj: FORCE HEALTH AND WELLNESS UNIT AWARD (GREEN H )

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

Subj: CHANGE OR EXCHANGE OF COMMAND OF NUCLEAR POWERED SHIPS. Encl: (1) Engineering Department Change of Command Inspection List

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 31 Oct Subj: NAVY ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY AND STANDARDS

OPNAVINST B N8 7 Nov Subj: NAVY TEST, MEASUREMENT, AND DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT, AUTOMATIC TEST SYSTEMS, AND METROLOGY AND CALIBRATION

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON, TN QOOO

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY. Naval Audit Service. Audit Report

Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is con

Successful First AESA Deployment through Application of Systems Engineering

ASSIGNMENT An element that enables a seadependent nation to project its political, economic, and military strengths seaward is known as 1-5.

Naval Sea Systems Command Did Not Properly Apply Guidance Regarding Contracting Officer s Representatives

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Subj: MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF LEATHER FLIGHT JACKETS

Code 25 Submarine Network Support Services. Pre-Solicitation Conference

Ref: (a) Navy Shipyard Test Managers Meeting of 9-11 Dec 2008 (b) Navy Shipyard Test Managers Meeting of Dec 2009

JOINT FLEET MAINTENANCE MANUAL VOLUME I NEW CONSTRUCTION LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES. Page Numbers Change in Effect Page Numbers Change in Effect

Command Overview Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division

STATEMENT OF REAR ADMIRAL MARK A. HUGEL, U.S. NAVY DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FLEET READINESS DIVISION BEFORE THE

From: Commander, Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Commander, Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Pacific

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC OPNAVINST DNS-3 11 Aug 2011

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

Resourcing U.S. Navy Public Shipyards

TTGL Command Brief Oct 2011

ADC REQUESTED CHANGE: Revisions subsequent to staffing are highlighted in yellow.

Subj: HEALTH FACILITY PLANNING AND PROJECT OFFICER PROGRAM

NAVY FORCE STRUCTURE. Actions Needed to Ensure Proper Size and Composition of Ship Crews

Subj: FULL POWER AND ECONOMY TRIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-NUCLEAR SURFACE SHIP CLASSES

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: RDT&E Ship & Aircraft Support

TO AIMD BAHRAIN CJTF-HOA J2X CAMP LEMONIER DJ CNIC ISC WASHINGTON DC COMFIFTHFLT COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JA COMNAVREG EURAFSWA NAPLES IT COMNAVREG MIDLANT

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

DEPARTMENT OF THE NA VY COMMANDER NAVY RESERVE FORCE 191 S FORREST AL DRIVE NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

Naval Oceanography in Mine Warfare

MCO MCSC 00T 23 JAN 2007

From: Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery To: Ships and Stations having Medical Department Personnel

Navy Community Service Environmental Stewardship Flagship Awards Past Award Winners and Honorable Mentions

7E=-G& Subj: ANNUAL COMMAND HISTORY FOR Ref: (a) OPNAVINST F

Subj: CERTIFICATION OF THE AVIATION CAPABILITY OF SHIPS OPERATING AIRCRAFT

Subj: REQUIRED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY AND PROJECTED OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT STATEMENTS FOR FLEET AIR RECONNAISSANCE SQUADRON SEVEN (VQ-7)

5750 Ser 00/ SEX) 00. From: Commanding Officer, Strike Fighter Squadron 25 To: Director of Naval History (N09BH)

Women in Submarines. Informational Brief

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER NAVY REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER 9170 SECOND STREET, SUITE 245 NORFOLK, VA 23511-2325 CNRMCINST 4790.2 Code 200 CNRMC INSTRUCTION 4790.2 From: Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center Subj: SUBMARINE REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER (RMC) FLEET TECHNICAL SUPPORT (FTS) ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Ref: Encl: (a) OPNAVNOTE 5400, Establishment of Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center, Norfolk, VA (b) COMUSFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3, Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual (JFMM) (1) Submarine RMC Fleet Technical Support (FTS) Mission Functions, Roles and Responsibilities 1. Purpose. To provide direction on Fleet Technical Support for Submarine Regional Maintenance Center's (RMCs). 2. Scope. For the purpose of this instruction, Norfolk Ship Support Activity (NSSA) RMC, South West Regional Maintenance Center (SWRMC), Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PHNSY & IMF), Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PSNSY & IMF), Regional Support Group New London (RSG NL), and TRIDENT Refit Facility Kings Bay (TRF KB) are considered submarine RMCs. 3. Background. Per reference (a), Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center (CNRMC) is responsible for developing and executing standardized Fleet Technical Support (FTS) maintenance processes and policies. 4. Discussion. The RMCs can improve the quality of support provided to the submarine fleet through implementation of common processes and policies, and developing working relationships between the RMCs which exchanges resources, data, results, exclusion areas and lessons learned. An essential step in~-- ----.._~_ accomplishing this is to understand the submarine FTS mission, as detailed in enclosure (1).

5. Policy. Submarine RMC Commanding Officers are accountable and responsible for accomplishing assigned FTS as outlined in reference (b) and clarified in enclosure (1). 6. Action. Upon receipt of this instruction all Submarine RMCs will take the following actions: a. Execute FTS tasks defined in enclosure (1) as required. Work with Type Commander (TYCOM) and other RMCs in the execution of assigned FTS tasks. b. Work with TYCOM to forecast annual FTS workload and identify resources required to accomplish projected workload. c. Manage, track, and report actual FTS workload and expenditures to both CNRMC and TYCOM. d. Utilize common reporting mechanisms, standard reports, metrics and processes in reporting FTS workload and financial data. 7. Cancellation. This instruction remains in effect until superseded. Distribution: NSSA SWRMC./fJ~4,~ DAVID J. &LE Copy to: COMUSFLTFORCOM NORFOLK VA (N43) COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI (N43) COMREGSUPPGRU GROTON CT COMSUBLANT NORFOLK VA (N4,,N4A, N4T, N42, N43) COMSUBPAC PEARL HARBOR HI (N4, N4A, N4T, N42, N43) COMNAVREG MIDLANT NORFOLK VA NAVIMFAC PACNORWEST BANGOR WA NAVSUBSUPFAC NEW LONDON CT SUBTECHSUPPCEN GROTON CT NAVSHIPYD PORTSMOUTH NH (DET SAN DIEGO CA) NAVSHIPYD & IMF PEARL HARBOR HI NAVSHIPYD AND IMF PUGET SOUND WA SERMC TRIDENT REFIT FACILITY KINGS BAY GA (100, 200, 300, 700) 2

SUBMARINE RMC FLEET TECHNICAL SUPPORT (FTS} MISSION FUNCTIONS, ROLES, AND RESPONSIBILITIES Ref: (a) OPNAVNOTE 5400, Establishment of Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center, Norfolk, VA (b) COMUSFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3, Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual (JFMM) Introduction Fleet Technical Support (FTS) is defined as the waterfront engineering, technical, logistics, and management support provided to Fleet and Type Commander (TYCOM) customers by Regional Maintenance Centers (RMC) to maintain ships in material condition sufficient to meet expected threats and effectively complete assigned missions. The RMCs promote fleet readiness and maintenance self-sufficiency of ships force in the operation and maintenance of shipboard systems and equipment through FTS. FTS is characterized in six Functions: (F1) Fleet Technical Assistance (FTA), (F2) System/equipment Operational and Maintenance Assessment, (F3) Modernization/Installation support, (F4) Shipyard/Availability/IMA support, (FS) Onboard ILS & Configuration Management support and (F6) CHENG/Engineering Technical Authority support. FTS also includes Management support of FTS programs, projects, initiatives, and tasks across all Functions. RMC Commanding Officers are responsible for accomplishing assigned FTS mission functions with FTS mission funding. In addition to FTS mission funding, RMCs receive reimbursable funding from System Commands (SYSCOMs) and other Navy customers to accomplish assigned FTS reimbursable functions. Function (Fl} - Fleet Technical Assistance (FTA} Per reference (b), FTA is the help that surface ships, air craft carriers, submarines, and craft request when they are unable to resolve equipment or software deficiencies using their own ships resources or other means available within the Strike Group. FTA is provided via distance support and/or on-board a fleet unit or on-site at a fleet activity. The initial response to all FTA requests will be via Distance Support utilizing Chat, Phone, Message, E-mail, Remote/Off-hull, etc. FTA is characterized by performing troubleshooting and fault isolation. FTA support consists of waterfront/deck-plate engineering, technical, logistics, management/coordination assistance and services; technical over-sight and consultation; over-the-shoulder maintenance training; and FTA data collection and reporting.

RMCs will serve as the primary source of FTA. RMC managers are responsible for ensuring adequate resources are available to provide FTA in their Area of Responsibility (AOR). FTA can be provided by activity Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) or obtained from another RMC, an In-Service Engineering Agent (ISEA), and/or an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM). RMCs work together to resolve capability and capacity challenges to provide global FTA. Assisting a ship with a CASREP/SUBs message is considered an FTA. Reference (b) states that RMC's are not responsible for technical assistance in the areas of uspecial clearance equipment". Special equipment is defined as TYCOM directed special mission equipment usually on loaded before a deployment. It does not include normal equipment in a deployed information assurance posture (i.e., up-posture) due to the nature of the ships mission. RMCs are responsible to manage the proper level of security clearances so that their technicians can still trouble shoot equipment in a deployed information assurance posture (up posture). RMC mangers are responsible for ensuring post-fta administrative tasks are staffed and performed in a timely manner. Post-FTA administrative tasks include an FTA debrief to ships force, assistance to ships force in completing the 2-Kilo (Block 35), collecting/entering FTA maintenance data into the common data reporting system, and generation/distribution of a Technical Assistance Visit Report (TAVR). Function {F2} - assessment System/equipment operational and maintenance System/equipment operational and maintenance assessments include scheduled shipboard assessments (e.g., Total Ship Readiness Assessment (TSRA); Combat Systems Assessments (CSA), etc.) and continuous operational and maintenance data assessments (e.g., Top Management Actions (TMA) ; Submarine Continuous Operational and Maintenance Assessment (SubCOMA), etc.) Scheduled shipboard assessments are characterized by teams of RMC SMEs led by a Test/Assessment Director performing authorized/approved test plans/procedures to determine material/mission readiness; identifying, resolving, and reporting discrepancies; and providing over-the-shoulder maintenance training to ships force. Continuous data assessments are characterized by system/equipment analysts and SMEs working together and analyzing fleet maintenance data to 2

identify/address fleet system/equipment problems and trends and provide "Actionable Data" to Fleet/TYCOM and SYSCOM customers in order to make "Data Driven Decisions" to improve mission readiness, system/equipment design, and life-cycle support. Also included in the (F2) Assessment Function is RMC SME waterfront, engineering, technical, and logistics support and feedback to Fleet/TYCOM, SYSCOM, and ISEA customers at Technical Conferences (e.g., Senior ST, Senior FT, EMO, I&EW, HM&E, Aux, etc.), Lean Events, Working Groups, Integrated Product Teams, etc., for system/equipment maintenance/maintainability and product improvement. Board of Inspection and Survey (INSURV) support is a reimbursable funded assessment. RMC managers work with Fleet/TYCOM to schedule and coordinate accomplishment of assigned assessments. RMC managers are responsible for ensuring adequate resources, including properly trained and experienced system/equipment-specific Subject Matter Experts (SME), are available to perform assigned assessments. RMCs managers work together to field assessment teams. RMC mangers are responsible for ensuring post-assessment data collection and reporting is staffed and performed in a timely manner. Function (F3) - Modernization/Installation support The synergy created by RMC involvement in modernization/installation establishes a mutually beneficial economic and technical environment that provides a coordinated, effective, and efficient infrastructure for ensuring a better balance of FTS and modernization/installation support sustainability. SYSCOMS benefit from RMC SME maintenance expertise in helping coordinate installation, testing, troubleshooting, and resolving technical challenges during modernization/installation events as well as helps enable the seamless transition from modernization to Fleet Technical Support. Fleet/TYCOM relies on RMC involvement in modernization/installation as it enables, enhances, and maintains the RMC's ability to provide FTS for continuously evolving systems. RMC Modernization/Installation support consists of alteration installation team (AIT) support including dock-side, at-sea, pre- and post- modernization/installation testing (PICO and SOVT) and shipboard technical and logistics support during system/equipment modernization installations. 3

RMC involvement in modernization/installation takes two forms as a Member of a modernization/installation AIT team (for which RMCs receive reimbursable funding from the AIT Sponsor) and/or by over-the-shoulder observation of the modernization/installation dependent on workload for whidh mission funding may be utilized. RMC managers work with SYSCOM/Warfare System Center customers to schedule and coordinate accomplishment of modernization/installation support. RMC managers are responsible for ensuring adequate resources are available to assist the AIT or observe the modernization installation. Function (F4) - Shipyard, Availability, IMA support Maintenance support is characterized by RMC SMEs providing technical assistance to shipyard/ima engineering and shop personnel in troubleshooting and fault isolation; pre/postavailability inspections and grooms; work packages and Task Group Instructions (TGis) review; provide engineering, technical, logistics oversight, guidance, and support to shipyard and IMA personnel during repair, replacement, overhaul, and testing. Maintenance support also includes providing system/equipment operation and maintenance on-the-job training to shipyard and IMA personnel. RMC managers work with shipyard and IMA customers to schedule and coordinate accomplishment of assigned maintenance support. RMC managers are responsible for ensuring adequate resources are available to provide assigned maintenance support. Function (FS) - support Onboard logistics and configuration management Onboard logistics and configuration management support is characterized by RMC SMEs and logistics personnel working with Fleet/TYCOM, SYSCOM, ISEA, OEM, NAVSUP WSS, Class CDM, shipyard, IMA, and ships force personnel to identify and resolve logistics and configuration management problems to improve material condition readiness. Onboard logistics and configuration management support for submarines includes system/equipment specific logistics and configuration management support for all of the FTS Functions (1-4) above such as FTA/CASREP material support; assist/support parts identification, requisition, expediting, and delivery; identify/address system, equipment, and material configuration 4

issues; TSRA and CSA logistics/cm audits; assisting ships force in updating supply/cosal records; installation of ILS products; RMMCO support; and generating 4790CKs. RMC managers work with Fleet/TYCOM and SYSCOM customers to schedule and coordinate accomplishment of assigned onboard logistics and CM support. RMC managers are responsible for ensuring adequate resources are available to provide assigned onboard logistics and CM support. Function (F6) - CHENG/Engineering Technical Authority Support RMC support for engineering technical authority is characterized by RMC managers, engineers, and SMEs working with and providing engineering and technical support/recommendations to the AOR CHENG to support the resolution of technical authority issues/questions which arise out of FTS and waterfront work executed in their homeport/aor. RMC managers are responsible for ensuring adequate resources, including highly trained and experienced engineers and system/equipment-specific Subject Matter Experts (SME), are available to provide CHENG/Technical Authority Support in their AOR. Only activities with a warranted Chief Engineer (CHENG) may charge to this functional area. Management In addition to the engineering, technical and logistics support provided by RMCs in the execution of FTS, the effort and resources required to manage FTS should also be considered. Management of FTS includes the administrative, personnel, and technical management of the daily execution of FTS as well as the management and support of FTS planning, reporting, programs, projects, initiatives, and tasks across all the FTS functions above. FTS management includes working with CNRMC, FTS customers, and other RMCs to accomplish the following: executing assigned FTS tasks; estimating annual FTS workload; determining/identifying resource requirements to accomplish assigned FTS; providing annual (current and out-year) funding requirements & budget submissions for accomplishing assigned FTS; managing, tracking, and reporting actual FTS workload and expenditures; providing FTS workload and financial data in response to data calls; utilizing CNRMC reporting mechanisms, standard reports, metrics and processes in reporting FTS workload and financial data; 5

managing and/or supporting FTS programs, projects, and initiatives; and participating in periodic RMC management meetings. RMC Commanding Officers and managers are responsible for ensuring adequate management resources are available to accomplish FTS in assigned AOR. 6