Latest Consumer Technology Innovations and Business Models

Similar documents
Overview of CMS HIT Initiatives. Kelly Cronin Senior Advisor to the Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services September 2005

Electronic Prescribing:

E-Prescribing: What Is It? Why Should I Do It? What's in the Future?

eprescribing Information to Improve Medication Adherence

When Will Health IT Support Quality Improvement?

Health Information Exchange 101. Your Introduction to HIE and It s Relevance to Senior Living

7/18/2017. Malinda Peeples MS, RN, CDE VP Clinical Advocacy WellDoc Columbia, MD. Disclosure to Participants

EHR for the PCMH A Doctor s Perspective. Medical Home Summit

Using Updox to Succeed with MIPS

The results will also be used for public reporting for MN Community Measurement on mnhealthscores.org.

June 25, Barriers exist to widespread interoperability

From Free Drug to Paid Prescriptions: PATIENT ASSISTANCE STRATEGIES TO ENSURE ROI. by Jan Nielsen, Division President, SonexusHealth

Toward the Electronic Patient Record:

Pay for Performance and Health Information Technology: Overview of HIT Pay for Performance Initiatives

eprescribe- Removing the Barriers

Transitioning to a Value-Based Accountable Health System Preparing for the New Business Model. The New Accountable Care Business Model

Provider s Frequently Asked Questions Availity in California

PBM SOLUTIONS FOR PATIENTS AND PAYERS

2011 Electronic Prescribing Incentive Program

Health Information Technology

Technology Driven Strategies for Enhancing Patient Engagement Within an ACO Model. ACO Congress November 5, 2013 Charles Kennedy

Using Telemedicine to Enhance Meaningful Use Qualification

National Health IT Week

Leveraging the EHR to Connect Physicians and Consumers

PBGH Response to CMMI Request for Information on Advanced Primary Care Model Concepts

Population Health. Collaborative Care. One interoperable platform. NextGen Care

CAQH CORE and ehealth Initiative Joint Webinar

Russell B Leftwich, MD

Meaningful Use Roadmap

Provider Perspectives on Patient Information: Results of 2017 Survey. October 19, 2017

Essentia Health. A View on Information Technology. ND HIMS Conference April 12, Tim Sayler, COO Essentia Health - West

Quanum eprescribing Frequently Asked Questions

Describe the process for implementing an OP CDI program

Quality Measures and Federal Policy: Increasingly Important and A Work in Progress. American Health Quality Association Policy Forum Washington, D.C.

NCQA s Patient-Centered Medical Home Recognition and Beyond. Tricia Marine Barrett, VP Product Development

HIE & Interoperability: Roadmap to Continuum of Care Michael McPherson MU Coordinator KDHE

Hospital Readmissions

Osteopathic Advocacy: Partnering to Advance Sound Health Policy. Nicholas Schilligo, MS Associate Vice President, State Government Affairs

Tools for Providers. Clinical Care and Practice AdvancementElectronic Health Records (EHR)

Health Care Evolution

CEOCFO Magazine. Andy Reeves, RPh Chief Executive Officer OptiMed Specialty Pharmacy

Specialty Pharmacy How is Traditional Pharmacy Practice Positioned

AHA Survey on Hospitals Ability to Meet Meaningful Use Requirements of the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Programs

1. What are the requirements for Stage 1 of the HITECH Act for CPOE to qualify for incentive payments?

2016 Activities and Accomplishments

Pharmacy Health Information Exchange The promise. The reality. The future.

HIT Glossary and Acronym List

Optum Anesthesia. Completely integrated anesthesia information management system

Benefits of National Provider Identifier

NewsBrief. Network. MyQuest Offers Online Lab Results. Best Practices for Doctor-Patient Experience. Role of PCPs in AOD Dependence

Use of Information Technology in Physician Practices

Executive Summary: Davies Ambulatory Award Community Health Organization (CHO)

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

CMS Incentive Programs: Timeline And Reporting Requirements. Webcast Association of Northern California Oncologists May 21, 2013

Population Health Management. Ashley Rhude RHIA, CHTS-IM HIT Practice Advisor

COLLABORATING FOR VALUE. A Winning Strategy for Health Plans and Providers in a Shared Risk Environment

ARRA HITECH Act and Nevada

Conduent State Level Registry for Provider Incentive Payments

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

Integrated Health System

Personal Health Record (PHR) Roundtable. HIMSS Annual Conference. Orlando, Florida February, 2008

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) January 21, 2010

STATEMENT. JEFFREY SHUREN, M.D., J.D. Director, Center for Devices and Radiological Health Food and Drug Administration

2017 Oncology Insights

Initial Commentary on Meaningful Use Final Rule

HIT SUMMIT Payment/Reimbursement Incentives: The Hudson Valley EMR Collaborative October 20, 2004

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Incentivizing Investments in Healthcare


Comparison of Health IT Provisions in H.R. 6 (21 st Century Cures Act) and S (Improving Health Information Technology Act)

Health Information Exchange. Anne Dobbins, RN Operations Director Minnesota Health Information Exchange (MN HIE)

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

THE EVOLUTION OF THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD: A ROADMAP FOR REALIZING THE VISION

Stroke System of Care: Health Policy Perspective. Penelope Solis Senior Policy Manager Phone:

PCC Resources For PCMH. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

UPDATE ON MEANINGFUL USE. HITECH Stimulus Act of 2009: CSC Point of View

GAO MEDICAL DEVICES. Status of FDA s Program for Inspections by Accredited Organizations. Report to Congressional Committees

ENHANCING PRESCRIBER RELATIONSHIPS: MAKING IT A WIN-WIN JULY 12, :00 5:00 PM

New Alignments in Data-Driven Care Coordination & Access for Specialty Products: Insights from the DIMENSIONS Report

HEALTHCARE 20/20: LEARNING FORWARD

CIO Legislative Brief

Examining the Differences Between Commercial and Medicare ACO Models

ARRA HEALTH IT INCENTIVES - UNCERTAINTIES ABOUT "MEANINGFUL USE"

Hospital Readmissions Survival Guide

The Ideal Personal Health Record

Care360 EHR Frequently Asked Questions

ICD-10 is Financially Disastrous for Physicians

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Overview

Patient Portal Success

Rural and Independent Primary Care.

Long Term Care Pharmacy

Our Journey In Health IT And Health Information Exchange Working Towards Ubiquitous, Computable Care. Review Data Systems For Monitoring HIV Care

Big data in Healthcare what role for the EU? Learnings and recommendations from the European Health Parliament

The Role of Health IT in Quality Improvement. P. Jon White, MD Health IT Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Preparing for DSRIP: Legal and Strategic Issues for Long-Term Care Providers. LeadingAge New York Webinar

Complex Challenges/Financial Impact Medical Necessity Compliance Role of the Physician Advisor. NJHFMA Finance for Clinicians Session March 24, 2016

Definition of Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology for Hospitals Approved by the HIMSS Board of Directors April 24, 2009

The Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology (CCHIT) -- Overview and Perspective --

Transcription:

Latest Consumer Technology Innovations and Business Models Josh Lemieux - Markle Foundation Ted Eytan - Group Health Cooperative Edward Fotsch - Medem Peter Neupert - Microsoft

Latest Consumer Technology Innovations and Business Models Ted Eytan Group Health Cooperative

Latest Consumer Technology Innovations and Business Models Edward Fotsch Medem

Personal Health Records: A Solution Looking for Someone with a Problem Edward Fotsch, MD (ed.fotsch@medem.com) Connecting for Health, HL7, JCAHO PHR Committees 111105EFX-20

PHR Definition Personal Health Records ( PHR ) consist of: 1. An online collection of basic patient data (meds, conditions, etc.) 2. Direct online communication with patients 111105EFX-21

PHR Reality Check 1. Payers, not consumers, are demanding PHRs 2. Patients are largely in denial of healthcare needs and realities They don t pay the bills They don t act responsibly 3. Indifference & lack of relevance are stopping consumer PHR adoption- not security concerns 4. Patients want to share data (PHRs) with providers, not payers & employers 5. PHRs that fail to connect patients to providers are like ATMs with no money in them 6. Providers have traditionally had no reason to adopt or use PHRs- docs go to work to make a living 7. PHR patient adoption will track PHR provider adoption 111105EFX-22

Events Leading to PHR Focus Nationally 1. Healthcare costs escalating threatening the economy 2. Engaging providers to lower costs has largely run its course ( managed care ) 3. It turns out that consumer behavior, not just physician behavior, impacts healthcare costs Amount of Time That Consumers Are On Their Own Amount of Time That Consumers Are Under Their Doctor s Direct Care 111105EFX-23

PHR Premise Government & Industry Assumptions re: PHRs: 1. HIT and PHRs can increase quality & efficiency of healthcare as it has in other industries 2. Consumers will become a major driver/user of HIT Who would go to a bank that did not have ATMs? 111105EFX-24

Employer Perspectives on PHRs- Oct 2006 Survey of Major U.S. Employers 75% of employers don t yet offer a PHR but >50% plan to within 3 years 50% plan to put financial incentives behind PHR adoption Top value of PHRs as seen by employers: Access to information in an emergency (80%) Delivering information and disease management to employees (80%) Sharing information with healthcare providers at the time of care (80%) Top PHR concerns by employers: Security & privacy (90%) Employee and provider willingness to use PHRs (85%) Top impact of PHRs on healthcare as seen by employers: Improved safety and quality (>90%) Improved direct employee engagement in their own care & health (90%) 111105EFX-25

PHR Reality Check Consumers don't believe EHRs will improve care, report says Healthcare IT News 12/01/06 By Richard Pizzi, Associate Editor NEW YORK - There is no public mandate for electronic health records systems in the United States because most consumers aren t convinced that the technology will improve healthcare, claims a new report by PricewaterhouseCoopers Health Research Institute The results reveal a significant gap between consumer attitudes on major healthcare topics and the perspectives of health industry insiders and policymakers. Our research shows that American consumers are not banging down any doors for an EHR or a PHR, said James Fisher, national director for Health IT at PricewaterhouseCoopers. The primary reason for the lack of public support is that the average American does not see a clear value proposition in electronic health records. 111105EFX-26

But Consumers are Disengaged and Fearful 52% of consumers are concerned that employers will use healthcare information to limit their employment opportunities; up from 36% in 1999 (CA Healthcare Foundation 2005) 59% of consumers do not trust their health insurer (Harris/WSJ 2004) 111105EFX-27

Consumers Want Convenience "If you could choose between two doctors, but only one used the following types of information technology in his or her practice, how much would this influence your choice of doctors?" 111105EFX-28

PHRs: What Consumers Want Reasons to have a personal or family health record? To provide all of my doctors or health care providers with information about me or my family s health and treatment To look back and recall what treatment, prescription drugs or other care I received and have used To provide access to key parts of the health record in case of emergency To provide information to different doctors or health care professionals if I were receiving care from more than one of these 78% 78% 77% 76% To ensure the proper use of prescription drugs 54% Base: All Adults 111105EFX-29 2004 Harris Interactive Inc.

The PHR Conundrum Health Plans & Employers want PHRs but; Consumers want PHRs from their own providers and; Providers have had little incentive to offer PHRs So The PHR Solution Health Plans & Employers can incent providers and; Providers will offer online PHR services and; Consumers will engage in a trusted PHR network and; Health Plans & Employers can deliver their health & wellness messages to consumers via a trusted network that links docs and patients 111105EFX-30

PHR Consumer Engagement Is Tough Without providers, online consumer uptake is minimal 111105EFX-31 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Actual Online Patient Engagement econsults Payer-only PHR MD- Recommended PHR Replace Clipboard <5% <1% ~5% >50% * *Industry data confirms >50% uptake. New AHA PHR study to further document

Key Questions Who will pay for and support interactive chronic care and PHR services? Group Government Payers & employers Manufacturers Patient advocacy groups Medical societies Liability Carriers Reason for Support Lowered costs & consumer empowerment Lowered costs & improved productivity Improved adherence = increased sales Consumer empowerment Strengthen the patientprovider relationship Decreased liability Type of Support Financial, leadership & promotional Financial & promotional Financial & promotional Promotional Promotional Promotional & financial *None of these groups can succeed alone but combined and coordinated they engage providers & deliver DM & PHRs to patients 111105EFX-32

Reality: Formula for PHR Success PHR services must work for providers & patients to be adopted Services must be easy to implement, low-cost and not disrupt physician workflow; primarily used by office staff Services can integrate with EHRs but must not require EHRs Services must have a clear and simple ROI measured in dollars and direct practice benefit (3Ps: patients, payment and protection) Low cost provider incentives would make PHRs a reality nationally + = + Simple Systems Provider Incentives End Clipboards Engaged Patient 111105EFX-33

Market Forces Aligned with HHS to Replace Clipboards with PHRs Growing forces behind PHR adoption by providers & patients Financial (P4P) including new HHS provider PHR incentives Direct consumer awareness campaigns Market-based incentives such as preferred practice marketing Decreased liability- liability carrier endorsement Regulatory (JCAHO, NCQA, etc.) Draft congressional legislation to provide public-private joint PHR incentives to providers CMS data feed to help patients keep PHRs current MDs Promotion Relaxation of Stark rules to allow hospitals to purchase HIT JCAHO NCQA 111105EFX-34

PHR Example From Clipboards to Quality Medem Confidential Information - - Copyright 2004 - Medem, Inc. - All Rights Reserved

Patient Registers for Appointment Online Creating PHR (No more clipboard) Michael Gilbert, MD SJHMG Logo on all physician practice Web sites Services Dr. Gilbert s Home Page Dr. Gilbert Patients can login and establish their ihealthrecord directly from the physician s practice Web site Patients & Families Health Education 2501 E. Chapman Ave. #201 Orange, CA 92869 (714) 628-3325 Patients access their secure Health Record with their user ID and password. If this is their first visit, they select a user ID and password to establish an ihealthrecord 111105EFX-36

Conditions, Medications, Procedures etc. Selected from Lists or Drop-down Menus Patients select, or confirm, conditions that apply to them from a pre-defined list, or from a drop-down menu. A subsequent screen will allow the patient to enter in additional details. This is the same format for medications and allergies. 111105EFX-37

Patients are Auto-enrolled in Education Programs for Their Meds and Conditions Dr. Gilbert Dr. Gilbert Secure emails to patients contain education messages specific for their medication and conditions. These can be SJHS specific programs 111105EFX-38

Users Can Grant Privileges to Their Health Record for Consultations or in Emergencies Patients are able to grant access to other clinicians or specialists Patients are able to grant readonly access to new clinicians or appropriate third parties. Patients are able to audit who has seen their record 111105EFX-39

Every Patient Comes to Appointment or Admission with Paperwork Completed 111105EFX-40

EMR-PHR Integration: CCR-based Data Exchange 111105EFX-41

PHR Benefits: Patients A secure PHR provided by their physician, but under their control All health information in one secure location, accessible anywhere/any time Ability for patients to share their PHR with other family members, new doctors or with an emergency department, with an audit trail The Emergency food and Drug ihealth Administration wallet card with (FDA) contact has asked information Pfizer and to voluntarily instructions on remove how to Bextra access (valdecoxib) their PHR from in an the emergency market. FDA is also asking manufacturers of all marketed prescription Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Secure (NSAIDs), email and including Online Celebrex Consultation (celecoxib), with their a COX-2 doctor selective (optional) NSAID, to revise the labeling (package insert) for their products to include a boxed warning, Ability to highlighting request appointments, the potential Rx for renewals increased or econsults risk of 24x7 cardiovascular Privacy oversight (CV) events by healthcare and the not-for-profits well described, serious, potential lifethreatening gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding associated with their use. Automated updates from the their physician s EMR No more clipboards; register once for all physician office visits Automatic patient education and FDA warnings that are specific to their medications and conditions 111105EFX-42

PHR Physician & Office Benefits Increased efficiency Patients arrive with paperwork completed in advance & typed Fewer phone calls with secure email Provider Directory Links Increased revenue Direct payment from econsults (avg $20/eConsult) Increased market share P4P A full service, customizable and practice -branded practice web site A stand-alone web site or integrated into existing web sites Improved documentation & liability protection 111105EFX-43

When PHRs = Consumer Convenience, They Become Market Relevant & Deliver ROI 111105EFX-44

Payer P4P and Proposed Congressional PHR Legislation Adds to PHR ROI Kennedy to introduce personal health records bill Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.) plans to introduce a bill this week to give physicians a financial incentive to create personal health records for their patients. Under the Personalized Health Information Act, physicians would receive a minimum of $2 for each patient for whom they build a personal health record listing the diagnoses they make and the medicines they prescribe, said Michael Zamore, a policy adviser in Kennedy's office, at the Health IT Summit sponsored by the ehealth Initiative. The idea is to jump-start the market for electronic health records by getting more physicians on board. Offering an incentive to develop basic digital records "gives them the benefits of EHR without making a big investment," Zamore said. 111105EFX-45

CMS is Saying the Right Things Medicare PHR P4P McClellan said CMS is already making major investments in our IT systems to support consumer-directed healthcare, he said. A big part of this is the PHR. Personalized information integrated with health care costs and quality data can work together. The CMS administrator also touted the agency s pay-for-performance initiatives It all comes back to identifying and paying for what we want - better quality and lower costs, McClellan said. We will create a high value healthcare system ehi Summit Sept 26, 2006 111105EFX-46

Path Forward: Formula for PHR Success Patients register online for appointments thereby creating PHRs Providers offer PHR systems with a clear ROI measured in dollars, marketing and increased efficiency Payers expand the incentives for providers & patients to use PHRs PHR networks allow for patient-provider-payer communication Patients experience increased convenience and are better connected to their own information & providers The Oprah Winfrey effect drives Healthcare IT forward + = + Simple Systems Provider Incentives End Clipboards Engaged Patient 111105EFX-47

Key Final Question What should Leaders do? Look for real progress and push government and industry for a consumercentric approach in a payer-provider partnership Do not confuse standards and oversight groups with progress; Establishing standards for systems that have little uptake provide only the illusion of progress Look for simple solutions that are consumer relevant focusing on what consumers want- services from their own providers NFP: Collaborate to increase consumer & provider awareness Use PHRs as a primary vehicle of online consumer engagement Officially endorse practical approaches to drive PHR uptake- Kennedy PHR bill CMS & Congress: Incentives to drive consumer and provider uptake CMS claims data feed to help keep beneficiary PHRs accurate Make interoperable PHR more market relevant w incentives The current direction = many proprietary PHR solutions w/o interoperability; Understand and partner with leaders driving real PHR adoption Providers, major consumer Internet firms, proactive payers, etc. 111105EFX-48

Personal Health Records: A Solution Looking for Someone with a Problem Edward Fotsch, MD (ed.fotsch@medem.com) Connecting for Health, HL7, JCAHO PHR Committees 111105EFX-49

Latest Consumer Technology Innovations and Business Models Peter Neupert Microsoft