Adaptive Re-use of the. Rowlett, Texas

Similar documents
California Main Street Four Point Approach

Carnegie Museum City of Houghton Strategic Plan June 2010

AMENDED MEMORANDUM of UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF WILLIAMSBURG AND THE WILLIAMSBURG ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAMS

OFFICE OF THE CENTRAL AREA CENTRAL AREA COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DOWNTOWN BRAMPTON BUILDING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES

Information Pack - Freelance (self-employed) roles Bannockburn House Trust - 30 January V4

The artwork can be attached to the fence structure or applied directly onto the fence.

Request for Proposals # P12-044A. Pre-Qualification - Purchase and. Development of Bloomfield Property

Ranch Duplexes. Ranch Duplex A 1,560 Sq. Ft. Ranch Duplex B. 1,568 Sq. Ft. imodular.04.01

Frankfort Historic Landmarks Arts Center

County of El Paso. Mission Trail Incentive Guidelines & Criteria

City of Batavia Signage Assistance Grant Program

CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVE PROGRAM HOME IMPROVEMENT REBATE POLICY

RESOLUTION NO.: R REVISED:

FAÇADE & INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION PACKET

Long-Range Plan February 8, 2018 February 8, 2023

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

223 W Wisconsin Ave. P.O. Box 131 Tomahawk, WI Operating Plan For the Tomahawk Downtown Business Improvement District 2019

Customer Guide. Colorado Historic Preservation Income Tax Credit

Five-Year Strategic Plan GOAL VERSION Draft 2017

Economic Development Journal

Strategic Plan January December 2015

EXISTING CONDITIONS

Business Redevelopment & Historic Building Grant Program

CREATIVE USES FOR VACANT BUILDINGS

YPSILANTI DDA BUILDING REHABILITATION AND FAÇADE PROGRAM

Attraction Development Grant Program Guidelines & Application

FACADE IMPROVEMENTS INCENTIVE PROGRAM for EXISTING COMMERICAL BUILDINGS

PLAN: Dudley Square June 2017 Planning Process Recap

THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE

HUDSON DRI PROJECT SUMMARY (2/21/18)

Downtown Mural Grant Program Guidelines

AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY SPECIFIC PLAN MARCH 2006

Strategic Plan

ELEVATE GRANTS DOWNTOWN FACADE GRANT PROGRAM

Promise Kept By: Gladys Cook Technical Advisor, Florida Housing Coalition

Strategic Plan

Town of Williamston Request for Proposals Mustang Alley Feasibility Study

FACADE IMPROVEMENTS INCENTIVE PROGRAM for EXISTING COMMERICAL BUILDINGS

STACKING THE FEDERAL AND STATE COMMERCIAL TAX CREDITS

Volunteer and Events Coordinator Contract

NEIGHBORHOOD BUILDING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Dane County Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Goals & Objectives HED Work Group July 7, 2006


Hawthorne Community Redevelopment Agency Facade Beautification Grant Program 2012

Economic Development Element of the Arroyo Grande General Plan. Prepared by the City of Arroyo Grande Community Development Department

Façade Improvement Program

Proposals for Stewart School

Preservation Incentive Program City of Victoria

MCKINSTRY INNOVATION CENTER

Fund Development and Events Coordinator PotashCorp children s museum

Appendix H Sample Partnership Policy

Heritage Incentives Scheme Operating Guidelines

Greektown Traditional Cultural Property District Facade Improvement Grant Program FACT SHEET

Building our future, together. Steering Committee Presentation for the Comprehensive Plan Update November 12, 2013

CROWDFUNDING FOR NONPROFITS

U n i v e rsity S ig n age Po l icy

Norcross Downtown Development Authority

2018 STABILIZATION/RESTORATION PROJECT APPLICATION

New York Main Street Program & New York Main Street Technical Assistance RESOURCE GUIDE

November 7, 2017 Bond Proposal FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Wilmington Downtown Incorporated. Facade Improvement Program POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Updated 8/30/17

Milwaukee Railroad Shops Historic District ~ Sioux City, Iowa. Prepared by Larry Obermeyer, Executive Secretary

PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAM GUIDE. ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS To be eligible to apply to the program:

PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL AND MUSEUM COMMISSION FUNDRAISING POLICIES AND GUIDELINES. Adopted: September 21, 2005

Designated Heritage Property Grant Program Guidelines

Membership, Year End Gifts & The Power of Thank You

Request for Proposals (RFP) For Restaurant Consulting Services 1657 Ocean Avenue

Eau Claire Public Market Feasibility Study

Executive Search Executive Director/ Vice President of LA Affairs MISSION

Facilities Condition Assessment

City of Niagara Falls May Niagara Street. Informational Brochure

SILVERTHORNE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX A - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT

Heritage Incentives Scheme Operating Guidelines

AD HOC COMMITTEE ON CONCESSIONS AT ONE MILE RECRATION AREA MEETING

HARRIETT FULLER RUST FACADE PROGRAM

Small Museum Friendly Grants AASLH Annual Meeting Richmond VA, September 2011

Guidelines. Research and Program Assistant. General Information

One-Time Grant for Non-Designated Commercial Heritage Property Application Package Deadlines: March 1 and October 1 (Updated: April, 2016)

Planning Board Submission Process and Instructions

City of Portsmouth Economic Development Commission 2011 Action Plan

PAINTER EXECUTIVE SEARCH

Boston Harbor Islands National and State Park

National Park Foundation Corporate Partnerships A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF 2016 OPPORTUNITIES

Affordable Housing Symposium: Socio Economic Panel. Building Sustainable Local Living Economies

Georgia Master Gardener Gold Star Advanced Training Application

FORWARD INFORMATION TO GRANT REVIEW COMMITTEE:

THE JAMES STREET SOUTH PUBLIC ART MURAL PROJECT

Town of Hoosick Request for Proposals for Design and Engineering Services

Public Art Policy Markham Municipal Projects

Downtown Storefront Improvement Grant City of Olathe, Kansas

The Faculty Club Campaign. A 100-year-old architectural gem meets the 21st century

HAMILTON HERITAGE PROPERTY GRANT PROGRAM

Eastern State Penitentiary Historic Site

Project/Program Profile

POLICY NUMBER: C553B AUTHORITY: City Manager EFFECTIVE DATE: October 31, Development Incentive Program Procedures

Park and Recreation Department Strategic Plan Dallas Park and Recreation Board October 1, 2015

Annual application deadlines First working day of February and September

Grants Program. Project Areas NOT Considered for Funding Religious organizations for religious purposes Political parties or campaigns

Transcription:

Adaptive Re-use of the Historic i Coyle Farmstead Rowlett, Texas

Project Goals and Activities: Develop appropriate adaptive re-use concepts for the historic Coyle Farmstead that provide for community groups, the public, and other users to utilize and appreciate the house. Project Tasks: TASK 1, Funding: Conduct interviews, hold meetings, and issue a survey to community leaders in order to determine fundraising strategies and donor prospects for the project. TASK 2, Re-use Options: Determine potential re-use concepts for the house based on input by City Staff, non-profit organizations, and community members. TASK 3, Building Evaluation: Conduct an architectural, structural, and electrical evaluation of the house and site, and produce measured drawings. TASK 4, Re-Use Concepts: Develop alternative concepts for re-use and associated funding options for the City of Rowlett. TASK 5, Documentation: Issue report of re-use concepts, Grant Eligibility S 5, ocu e tat o : ssue epo t o e use co cepts, G a t g b ty Determination, and funding options to the City Council for review and comments.

Significance of the Coyle farmstead 1850: Coyles arrive in Rowlett 1882: J.E. Coyle was born in Rowlett and spent his life farming, raising cattle, operating a cotton gin, and serving on the board of Rowlett s first bank. 1918: J.E. Coyle and wife, Eula Coyle, built the Coyle farmstead (at 4822 Main Street); they raised eight children in this house. J.E. and Eula Coyle worked side-byside in the fields, and grew their small farm into a successful dairy. 1927: J.E. Coyle brought electricity to downtown Rowlett when he converted his steam-power cotton gin to electric power. Children of the first Coyle Family settlers, ~1900 Photo credit: A History of Rowlett, 68

Significance of the Coyle farmstead 1952: J.E. Coyle helped the City of Rowlett to become incorporated, and served on Rowlett s first City Council; he donated land for the city s first water well and fire station. 1959: Dallas Agricultural Club honored J. E. as farmer of the year for his practice of soil conservation. J. E. Coyle died in 1975; Eula died in 1980 at the age of ninety-five. 1980 2008: Billy Coyle, grandson of J. E., inherited farmstead. He, and later his daughter Susan Coyle Kirby lived in the house. 2008: George Bush Turnpike cuts through Coyle land and house; NTTA purchases house. 2009: NTTA moves house to current location and donates house to the City of Rowlett. The Coyle House ca. 1920 Mr. J.E. and Eula ua Coye Coyle Photo credit: A History of Rowlett, 69

Coyle Farmstead before and after Coyle House, c. 1920 Coyle House, 2010

Coyle Farmstead Public Involvement Numerous meetings with non-profit organizations, civic organizations, and advisory boards and commissions serving the City of Rowlett. Community, Civic and city meetings were held to solicit input from the Rowlett residents about future uses of the Rowlett farmstead: Groups Date Vernon Schrade and Lorene Coyle Schrade 01/08/10 Knights of Columbus 02/04/10 Senior Citizens of Rowlett 02/08/10 Arts & Humanities Commission 02/09/10 Senior Advisory Board 02/15/10 Ben White, Economic Development 02/15/10 Donna Huerta, Publications i 02/15/10 City Council 02/16/10 Rowlett Historical Society 02/17/10 Special Events Committee 02/17/10 Planning & Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment 02/23/10 Funding Focus Group Meeting 02/23/10 Keep Rowlett Beautiful 03/08/10 Parks Department 03/09/10 Parks & Recreation Board 03/10/10 Public Meeting 04/04/10 Over 100 Rowlett residents (and 25+ city staff) participated in these meetings. roup or Individual

Coyle Farmstead Public Involvement Numerous meetings with non-profit organizations, civic organizations, and advisory boards and commissions serving the City of Rowlett. Community, Civic and city meetings were held to solicit input from the Rowlett residents about future uses of the Rowlett farmstead: Re-Use Options Suggested Private Parties, Weddings, Event Space Senior Citizen Facility Offices for Non-Profits Meeting Space for Local Organizations Children s camp, Classroom, or Daycare Space Small Business Incubator or Co-op Extension of the Rowlett Community Center House Museum or History Center Community Garden Coffee Shop Art Center or Artists Exhibition Space # of Suggestions IIII IIII IIII III II IIII II III I I IIII IIII II I IIII Summary: The community is interested in using the historic Coyle house for public and private events and using the house to continue to tell the story of the Coyle family as one of Rowlett s early settlers. Red text indicates most popular uses suggested.

Public Involvement Suggestions for Reuse Café and local art center to generate visitors Event space to maintain operating budget Mixed-use office space and history center Community garden maintained by volunteers

Coyle Farmstead Architectural, Structural and Site Evaluation Northwest oblique

Coyle Farmstead Architectural, Structural and Site Evaluation Northwest oblique

Coyle Farmstead Architectural, Structural and Site Evaluation Historic front door and sidelights interior view.

Coyle Farmstead Architectural, Structural and Site Evaluation Living Room with fireplace, showing historic wood doors, and door and window frame

Coyle Farmstead Architectural, Structural and Site Evaluation Interior of center hall with wood floor and wood flooring. Second floor main room, with historic shellac d beaded board ls and ceiling and wood flooring.

Coyle Farmstead Architectural, Structural and Site Evaluation Kitchen (c. 1980s)

Coyle Farmstead Architectural, Structural and Site Evaluation Back porch with historic siding, beaded board ceiling and doors and trim (originally open)

Coyle Farmstead Architectural, Structural and Site Evaluation Outbuildings

Coyle Farmstead Architectural, Structural and Site Evaluation Site Elements historic cellar Well and pump house

Architectural Issues - Design and Preservation Pedestrian and vehicular access to the Coyle house. Accessibility to the house and site for those individuals with disabilities. Restoration/rehabilitation of house interiors. Interior modifications to accommodate selected use/s. Structural implications of various uses (eg: assembly uses) Education of the community about Coyle s family history Landscape and use of the exterior spaces Front porch Two-story porte cochere with garage beyond.

Coyle Farmstead - Structural Issues Porch framing deteriorated Porte-cochere and sleeping porch unstable Column under porch not centered

Second floor will need to be shored if occupied New foundation Steel posts in place of columns on east facade Milking shed very unstable

Coyle Farmstead Issues Site and Landscape Historic fencing Large retaining wall (too tall), requires sturdy fence. Drainage issues & pedestrian pathways

Dead mitigation trees Slope and drainage issues Fire lane access Parking & vehicular access

Coyle Farmstead Issues Funding Research and Grant Eligibility House Museum fundraising options Living History Center or educational purpose Grant opportunities for historic preservation uncertain.

Coyle Farmstead Funding Research and Grant Eligibility 1. Information Gathering 1. Focus Group 2. Survey 2. Uses of the Farmstead defines Funding/Management 3. Fundraising Environment 4. Campaign Strategy Phase 1: Capital Campaign Campaign Readiness Phase 11: Campaign Development Plan 5. Committee Leadership 6. Historic Preservation Funding Prospects roup or Individual

Coyle Farmstead Funding Research and Grant Eligibility Starting points: What are the basic costs of stabilizing / adapting Coyle House for public use? How will the house be used? Use dictates funding with multi-use/variety of programs attracting more funders. Who will raise funds / manage operations? A new or existing nonprofit? The City? Whatever the use: Economic environment continues to impact giving. Planning must include: Immediate needs - stabilization and capital costs; Ongoing needs - annual operating expenses; Long term vision of the area/neighborhood; Business or strategic plan.

Coyle Farmstead Funding Research and Grant Eligibility Starting points: What are the basic costs of stabilizing / adapting Coyle House for public use? How will the house be used? Use dictates funding with multi-use/variety of programs attracting more funders. Who will raise funds / manage operations? A new or existing nonprofit? The City? Whatever the use: Economic environment continues to impact giving. Planning must include: Immediate needs - stabilization and capital costs; Ongoing needs - annual operating expenses; Long term vision of the area/neighborhood; Business or strategic plan.

Coyle Farmstead Funding Research and Grant Eligibility Whatever the use: Successful fundraising depends on: Strong community leadership and case for support; Enough donor prospects and volunteers Collaborative partners. Local support is critical. Strategy for Campaign Planning / Advance stages typically take one year; 80% of the goal will come from 20% of the donors; Lead or pacesetting gift should be 10-20% of the goal; Foundations will look for local support, collaborations, outcomes. Campaign structure and strategy detailed in the report.

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Existing Floor Plans

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Re-Use Concept A: Coyle Family / Rowlett House Museum.

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Pros & Cons Pros: Preserves history and heritage of one of Rowlett s early families. Open to public as a museum (tours, school groups,,p public). Community amenity. Location provides visibility from RCC and Main Street. Non-profit organization to run museum (manage tours, volunteers, etc). Cons: Historic house museums not frequented by locals after initial visit. Difficult to sustain historic house museums. Limited use (tours) and attendance Need for constant annual fundraising. Failure to properly maintain building reflects badly on City. Limited use of grounds still creates ongoing maintenance Re-Use Concept A: Coyle Family / Rowlett House Museum.

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Re-Use Concept A Site Plan: Coyle Family / Rowlett House Museum

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Re-Use Concept B: Events / Museum

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Pros & Cons Pros: Preserves history and heritage of one of Rowlett s early families. Community amenity. Open to public for events and meetings. Location provides visibility from RCC and Main Street. Cons: Will not promote tourism. Limited historic/architectural significance that locals would visit more than once. Difficult for non-profit to be sustainable. Need for constant annual fundraising. Failure to properly maintain building reflects badly on City. Two historic rooms offer limited museum experience; not a revenue source. Upkeep of grounds important to support events. Re-Use Concept B: Events / Museum

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Re-Use Concept B Site Plan: Events / Museum

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Re-Use Concept C1: Events / Office (w/o elevator)

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Pros & Cons Pros: Highlights history, preserves the building. Community amenity - open to public for events and meetings. Increased uses (events and office space) revenue. Location provides visibility from RCC and Main Street. Cons: Will not promote tourism. Interiors not preserved, no historic room as museum. Limited historic/architectural significance that locals would visit more than once. Failure to properly maintain building reflects badly on City. Upkeep of grounds important to support events. Re-Use Concept C1: Events / Office (w/o elevator)

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Re-Use Concept C2: Events/Office (with an elevator)

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Pros & Cons Pros: Highlights history, preserves the building. Community amenity - open to public for events and meetings. Increased uses (events and office space) revenue. Location provides visibility from RCC and Main Street. Add l office space at 2 nd floor. Cons: Will not promote tourism. Interiors not preserved, no historic room as museum. Limited historic/architectural significance that locals would visit more than once. Failure to properly maintain building reflects badly on City. Upkeep of grounds important to support events. Additional office space at 2 nd floor requires add l cost of elevator and structural reinforcement. Re-Use Concept C2: Events / Office (with an elevator)

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Re-Use Concept C1 and C2 Site Plan: Events / Office

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Re-Use Concept D1: Coyle House at the Rowlett Community Center w/o elevator

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Pros & Cons Pros: Highlights history, preserves the building. Community amenity - open to public for events and meetings. Increased uses (events and office spaces) generate revenue. Location provides visibility from RCC and Main Street. Building modified to suit changing needs of environment. Increased uses requires two restrooms, and elimination of kitchen. Coyle House strongly associated with the RCC, with a separate identity. Cons: Will not promote tourism. Interiors not preserved, no historic room as museum. Limited historic/architectural significance that locals would visit more than once. Failure to maintain building reflects badly on City. Upkeep of grounds important to support events. Re-Use Concept D1: Coyle House at the Rowlett Community Center (w/o elevator)

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Re-Use Concept D2: Coyle House at the Rowlett Community Center (with elevator)

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead Pros & Cons Pros: Highlights history, preserves the building. Community amenity - open to public for events and meetings. Increased uses (events and office spaces) generate revenue. Location provides visibility from RCC and Main Street. Additional office space at 2 nd floor. Building modified to suit changing needs of environment. Increased uses requires two restrooms, and elimination of kitchen. Coyle House strongly associated with the RCC, with a separate identity. Re-Use Concept D2: Coyle House at the Rowlett Community Center (with an elevator) Cons: Will not promote tourism. Interiors not preserved, no historic room as museum. Limited historic/architectural significance that locals would visit more than once. Failure to maintain building reflects badly on City. Upkeep of grounds important to support events. Elevator located at exterior changes historic appearance. Additional office space at 2 nd floor requires additional cost of elevator and structural reinforcement.

Re-Use Concepts for the Coyle Farmstead XXXX Re-Use Concept D1 & D2 Site Plan: Coyle House at the Rowlett Community Center

Summary Policy Questions: 1. What is the appropriate use? Coyle Family /Rowlett Museum Events and Meetings Offices (non-profit, city Extension of the Rowlett Community Center Combination of above Note: Use determines operations and fundraising strategies. 2. Depending upon use selected, what is Council s vision for management and operations of the Coyle House? 3. Council s vision for short term (5+years) and long term (10+ to 15+ years) to reflect changing environment? Utilize 2 nd floor???? Other Questions?

Adjourn