SIGNIFICANT NONCOMPLIANCE OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE LIMITS... 3 NONCOMPLIANCE NOTIFICATION (NCN)... 4 NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NOV)... 4

Similar documents
GREEN BAY METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT PRETREATMENT ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE PLAN. (January 1, 2017)

PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE PLAN. November 2000

1. The purpose of this Program is to provide a framework for asset management of separate sanitary sewer systems to meet the following goals:

DRAFT. (Industry Name) (Industry Address) (Industry Address) (SIC NUMBER (S))

Georgia FOG Alliance Awards Program Inspection Form

SEPTIC MAINTENANCE PROGRAM RULES (ARTICLE 10)

j Water Utility Authority

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Prepared by: Crenna M. Brumwell, Esq. 300 Main Street Suite 330 Dubuque IA ORDINANCE NO

FATS, OILS, & GREASE (F.O.G.) SPECIFICATIONS & DETAILS

INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PERMIT

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PERMITS AND SERVICES DIVISION STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAMS DIVISION

May 24, Honorable Hugh Hardgrave, Mayor City of Lavaca P.O. Box 3 Lavaca, AR Dear Mayor Hardgrave:

DOTHAN CLEAN WATERS PROGRAM CITY COMMISSION UPDATE

Last printed January 27, :19 AM

Environmental Management Chapter

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. Development and Implementation of the City s Industrial Pretreatment Program

Department of Health Presentation: May 18 th Presenters: Jacqueline Jones and Bonnie Stevens

Ch. 55 NONCARRIER RATES AND PRACTICES CHAPTER 55. NONCARRIER RATES AND PRACTICES

ReWa Capacity Approval Process Public Main Extension Project

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. June 2, 1997

Business Redevelopment & Historic Building Grant Program

MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY

Okla. Admin. Code 340: : Purpose. Okla. Admin. Code 340: : Definitions [REVOKED] Okla. Admin.

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD

65-1,201. Definitions. As used in the residential childhood lead poisoning prevention act: History: L. 1999, ch. 99, 2; Apr. 22

City of Batavia Downtown Improvement Grant

2018 National Pretreatment & Pollution Prevention Workshop & Training May 15-18, 2018

Template modified: 27 May :30 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE JULY 1994.

BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 20 JULY 1994

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH BEHAVIOR ANALYST LICENSING BOARD DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated _Title 36. Public Health and Safety_Chapter 7.1. Child Care Programs_Article 1.

Family Child Care Licensing Manual (November 2016)

ORDINANCE NO. 640 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRUITLAND, IDAHO:

HEALTH & SAFETY POLICY CONTENTS

FACADE IMPROVEMENTS INCENTIVE PROGRAM for EXISTING COMMERICAL BUILDINGS

Chapter 90A. Sanitarians and Water and Wastewater Treatment Facility Operators.

I. NPDES Permits BUREAU OF MINING PROGRAMS

City of Jacksonville, Alabama Public Square Overlay District. Façade Improvement Program APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT

CITY OF BUENA PARK SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN

FACADE IMPROVEMENTS INCENTIVE PROGRAM for EXISTING COMMERICAL BUILDINGS

Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Enforcement Program

SECTION 4. Construction Site Runoff Control Program

Compliance Appendix E: Compliance Budget Overview

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALDevelopment of a Local

Developing and Executing FOG Stakeholder Education and Training Programs. Wayne H. Ludwig, Jr. FOG Unit Coordinator WSSC

PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT SANITARY CODE

March 9, Gary Smith, Utilities Director City of Van Buren P.O. Drawer 1269 Van Buren, AR Dear Mr. Smith:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1989 SESSION CHAPTER 372 SENATE BILL 372

CHAPTER 2 FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS

2016 Uptown Westerville Façade Improvement Program Guidelines

Department of Code Compliance

Water Infrastructure Funding Opportunities through The NYS Environmental Facilities Corporation

Environmental Management Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT LAND DIVISION - SOLID WASTE PROGRAM

2018 National Pretreatment & Pollution Prevention Workshop and Training May 15-18, 2018

Pennsylvania s Act 13 of SRBC Water Quality Advisory Committee Meeting May 21, 2012

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 214

WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PERMIT

ENERGY AUDITS & RETRO-COMMISSIONING LOCAL LAW 87 OF 2009 Compliance Checklist & User s Guide

New Mexico Statutes Annotated _Chapter 24. Health and Safety _Article 1. Public Health Act (Refs & Annos) N. M. S. A. 1978,

Child Care Program (Licensed Daycare)

Unregulated Heating Oil Tank Program Guidance

2.2 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (DPW) ORGANIZATIONAL CHART CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Director of PW

MARITIME ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE

R.S. 37:3081. CHAPTER 41. DIETITIANS AND NUTRITIONISTS

Façade Improvement Program Application for Participation

This Approval does not cover the use of the Exceptional Quality biosolid in a trial composting with "green waste".

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. March 16, 1999

APPENDIX A PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR MINOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL REASONS FOR ADOPTION OF RULES

Conservation Leadership and Innovation Program (CLIP)

Building Facade Improvement Program GUIDELINES

LAKEWOOD FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDARD OPERATING GUIDELINES

IACUC Policy 09: Researcher Non-Compliance

St Anne's Community Services Staff Manual

FY 2016 Clean Water Fund Competitive Grants Policy

1.1 About the Early Childhood Education and Care Directorate

Page 1 of 7 YALE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT PURSUIT AND EMERGENCY DRIVING GENERAL ORDER JAN 2012 ANNUAL

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES DIVISION CHAPTER CHILD CARE AGENCY BOARD OF REVIEW

ATTACHMENT A GARDEN STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION TRUST FUND PROGRAM REGULATIONS. (selected sections)

March 4, Jonathan Huber Huber Rental Properties, LLC 324 Cherry Street Arkadelphia, AR RE: White Elephant Apartments. Dear Mr.

JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT ENFORCEMENT OVERVIEW. Cynthia Ovdenk Project Manager, Enforcement Section

NPDES Small MS4 General Permit (ARR040000) Annual Reporting Form

The requirements for the Organization element of the SSMP are:

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER BY CONSENT

ST THOMAS MORE PRIMARY SCHOOL

FISCAL YEAR FAMILY SELF-SUFFICIENCY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT (Attachment to Form HUD-1044) ARTICLE I: BASIC GRANT INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS

4/3/2018. Nursing Facility Changes to Conditions of Participation (& Enforcement): What You Need to Know. Revisions to State Operations Manual

CHAPTER MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION THERAPY

Hazardous Waste Facility Permit

University of Michigan Policy On Investigating Noncompliance and Animal Welfare Concerns

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Chapter 5 CIVIL DEFENSE*

4/14/2017. Green Infrastructure Funding Opportunities

Developing your council s asbestos policy. A guide to using the 2015 Model Asbestos Policy for NSW Councils to develop an asbestos policy

Contract Effective Date: January 1, Member Agency Name: Agency Physical Address: Agency Mailing Address:

Uptown Westerville Façade Improvement Program Guidelines

Section 5 BMP Implementation and Evaluation 5.1 Introduction

Transcription:

TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNIFICANT NONCOMPLIANCE OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE LIMITS... 3 NONCOMPLIANCE NOTIFICATION (NCN)... 4 NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NOV)... 4 SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE... 5 ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES... 5 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS... 5 PENALTY ASSESSMENT... 6 FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC UTILITIES FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE... 7 ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE PLAN FOR MULTI-DWELLING UNITS/GREASE-RELATED SEWER OVERFLOWS AND OBSTRUCTIONS... 10 Abbreviations: AO Administrative Order BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand FOG Fats, oils and grease FSE Food Service Establishment GCE Grease Control Equipment MDU Multi Dwelling Unit NCN Noncompliance Notification NOV Notice of Violation POTW Publicly Owned Treatment Works SCO Show Cause Order SPS Sewage Pumping Station TSS Total Suspended Solids T Pipe to convey a fluid substance WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant 2

SIGNIFICANT NONCOMPLIANCE OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE LIMITS The E.P.A. has defined "significant noncompliance" as violations that meet one or more of the following criteria: 1. Chronic violations of wastewater discharge limits, defined here as those in which sixty-six (66%) percent or more of all of the measurements taken during a six-month period exceed the daily maximum limit or the average limit for the same pollutant parameter; 2. Technical Review Criteria (TRC) violations, defined here as those in which thirty-three (33%) percent or more of all of the measurements for each pollutant parameter taken during a sixmonth period equal or exceed the product of the daily average maximum limit, or the average limit multiplied by the applicable TRC (TRC = 1.4 for BOD, TSS, fats, oil, and grease, and 1.2 for all other pollutants except ph). The following compatible pollutants are exempt from TRC consideration if they exceed the surcharge level but do not exceed upper ceiling: BOD, TSS, FOG; 3. Any other violations of a pretreatment effluent limit that the Control Authority (Fayetteville Public Utilities) determines has caused, alone or in combination with other discharges, interference or pass-through, including endangering the health of POTW personnel or the general public; 4. Any discharge of a pollutant that has caused imminent endangerment to human health, welfare or to the environment or has resulted in the POTW s exercise of its emergency authority to halt or prevent such a discharge; 5. Failure to meet, within 90 days after the schedule date, a compliance schedule milestone contained in a local control mechanism or enforcement order for starting construction, completing construction, and attaining final compliance; 6. Failure to provide, within 30 days after the due date, required reports, such as baseline monitoring reports, 90 day compliance reports, periodic self monitoring reports, and reports on compliance with compliance schedules; 7. Failure to accurately report noncompliance; 8. Any other violation or group of violations that the Control Authority determines will adversely affect the operation or implementation of the local pretreatment program. Generally, an isolated instance of noncompliance or a Category 0 violation can be met with an informal response or Noncompliance Notification (NCN). Any Category 1 to Category 4 violations should be responded to with an escalation in enforcement that requires a return to compliance by a specific deadline. 3

NONCOMPLIANCE NOTIFICATION (NCN) Generally issued by the inspector/field personnel, the Noncompliance Notification (NCN) is an official communication from the Fayetteville Public Utilities to the non-compliant User that deficiencies have been identified. Most NCN s allow the non-compliant facility a 30 day period to respond to the deficiencies. Failure to respond to an NCN will result in the issuance of a Notice of Violation. NCNs may be issued to food service establishments for the following deficiencies: Grease Interceptor Effluent (outlet) T not acceptable Grease Interceptor Effluent (outlet) T not visible or accessible for inspection Grease Interceptor mid-wall baffle or side walls indicates deterioration of concrete Grease Interceptor FOG and food solids layer are greater than 25% of the capacity of the interceptor tank, or interceptor was not pumped within last 180 days FOG evident in downstream sewer line from this facility Facility has no grease control equipment installed No records of interceptor or trap maintenance available at the facility Sewer cleanout covers missing or damaged, allowing rainfall inflow to sanitary sewer FOG on ground, around recycle bin or dumpster, causing storm water impact NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NOV) Generally issued by the inspector/field personnel, the Notice of Violation (NOV) is an official communication from the Department (Fayetteville Public Utilities) to the non-compliant User that informs the facility that the pretreatment violation has occurred. The NOV is issued for relatively minor or infrequent violations of pretreatment standards and requirements and should be issued within five (5) working days of the identification of a violation. A NOV does not contain assessment of penalties or cost recovery. The NOV provides the User with an opportunity to correct the noncompliance on its own initiative rather than according to a schedule of actions determined by the Department. The NOV documents the initial attempts of the Department to resolve the noncompliance. Authenticated copies of NOV's may serve as evidence in judicial proceedings. 4

SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE A Schedule of Compliance is a detailed list of the steps to be taken by a non-compliant facility whereby compliance with all pretreatment regulations will be achieved. This schedule shall contain increments of progress in the form of dates for the commencement and completion of major events leading to the construction and operation of additional pretreatment required for the User to meet the applicable Pretreatment Standards. ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES An administrative is a monetary assessed by the Department for violations of pretreatment standards and requirements. Administrative penalties are to be used as an escalated enforcement action and are punitive in nature and are not related to a specific cost born by the Department. Instead, the amount of the should recapture any economic benefit gained by noncompliance and/or deter future violations. An Administrative Order is to be used to assess an administrative. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS Administrative Orders (AO) are to be issued by the Pretreatment Coordinator, or the CEO / General Manager of Fayetteville Public Utilities. Administrative Orders are enforcement documents that direct Users to undertake and/or to cease specified activities. Administrative Orders are to be used as the first formal response to significant noncompliance, and may incorporate compliance schedules, administrative penalties, assessments for costs incurred during investigation and/or enforcement, attorney s fees, assessments for damages and termination of service. The Department has adopted four (4) general types of AOs: Compliance Orders, Show Cause Orders, Cease and Desist Orders, and Agreed Orders. 1. COMPLIANCE ORDER - A Compliance Order directs the User to achieve or restore compliance by a specified date and is the primary means of assessing penalties and costs. The Compliance Order will document the noncompliance and state required actions to be accomplished by specific dates and is issued by the Department. 2. SHOW CAUSE ORDER - An Order to Show Cause directs the User to appear before the Department, explain its noncompliance, and show cause why more severe enforcement action should not be pursued. The hearing is open to the public and may be formal or informal. The results of all hearings, along with any data and testimony submitted as evidence, are available to the public and may serve as evidentiary support for future enforcement actions. 3. CEASE and DESIST ORDER - A Cease and Desist Order directs a noncompliant User to cease illegal or unauthorized discharge immediately or to terminate discharge altogether. To preserve the usefulness of this order in emergency situations, penalties should not be assessed in this document. A Cease and Desist order will be used in situations where the discharge is causing interference, pass through, environmental harm, or otherwise creating an emergency situation. The order may be issued immediately upon discovery of an emergency situation or following a hearing. In an emergency, the order to cease and desist may be given by telephone with a 5

subsequent written order to be served by the Department before the close of business on the next working day. If the User fails to comply with the order, the Department may take independent action to halt the discharge. 4. AGREED ORDER - The Agreed Order is an agreement between the Department and the User. The Agreed Order normally contains three elements: (1) compliance schedules with specific milestone dates; (2) stipulated penalties, damages, and/or remedial actions; and (3) signature by the Department and the User representative. An Agreed order is appropriate when the User assumes the responsibility for its noncompliance and is willing (in good faith) to correct the causes. PENALTY ASSESSMENT Determining a amount that reflects the violation s significance is extremely important. If the is too small, its deterrent value is lost and the User may regard the amount as a tax or nominal charge to pollute. If the is too great, it could bankrupt the business (making necessary investment in pretreatment equipment impossible or potentially forcing unnecessary closure). The Department has categorized the various types of violations, and assigned a range to each category. Penalty categories are determined by using the Enforcement Response Table (page 7). All assessments will be approved and signed by the Department or their designee. Penalty amounts are considered to be an economic deterrent to the illegal activity. Penalty ranges have been designed to recover any economic benefit gained by the violator through non-compliance. 1. CATEGORY 0 = No 2. CATEGORY 1 = $50.00 to $500.00 3. CATEGORY 2 = $50.00 to $1,000.00 4. CATEGORY 3 = $50.00 to $10,000.00 5. CATEGORY 4 = DIRECT LEGAL ACTION - Any penalties and/or costs to be assessed at the maximum allowable by applicable law and included as part of the legal action. Assessments for damages or destruction of the facilities of the POTW, and any penalties, costs, and attorney s fees incurred by the pretreatment agency as the result of the illegal activity, as well as the expenses involved in enforcement, are not part of this assessment procedure and would be in addition to any penalties assessed as described above. 6

FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC UTILITIES FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE Incident 1. Failure to install grease control equipment, grease interceptor structural failure (baffle wall collapsed, walls deteriorated, tank leaking, infiltration/inflow in tank), failure to install proper effluent (outlet T), or no access to effluent (outlet T) to determine compliance a. 1 st Notification Noncompliance Notification of problem b. 2 nd Notification Failure to comply with NCN c. 3 rd Notification Failure to comply with NOV 7 Category Level 0 1 2 Action Taken Issue NCN 30 day Issue NOV 15 day Issue AO $500 30 day deadline for response d. 4 th Notification Failure to comply with AO 3 Issue $250/day 2. Facility contributing FOG to downstream manhole, SPS, or WWTP classify degree of impact for appropriate response a. Slight FOG impact (slight coating of FOG in POTW less than ¼ coverage ½ of pipe) b. Moderate FOG impact (moderate coating FOG in POTW, less than ½ coverage ½ of pipe) c. Heavy FOG impact (heavy coating FOG in POTW causing obstruction and/or interference in sewer line) d. Heavy FOG impact (facility s discharge caused bypass or sanitary sewer overflow) 3. Grease Control Equipment not maintained (pumped or cleaned) *Interceptor has >25% FOG and solids, or >180 days *Trap cleaned>monthly a. 1 incident within 24 month period 0 b. 2 incidents within 24 month period 1 0 2 3 NCN 30 day deadline for response NOV 30 day deadline for response; reimburse cleaning cost to Department, require interceptor mid-wall sweep Reimburse cleaning cost to Department & AO - $1,000 ; require interceptor mid-wall sweep 4 Direct Legal Action Issue NCN 30 day Issue NOV 15 day

Incident Category Level c. 3 incidents within 24 month period 2 Action Taken Issue NOV - $500 d. 4 incidents within 24 month period 3 Issue SC - $1,000 e. 5 incidents within 24 month period 3 4. Failure to respond to any notification letter within 30 days 5. No records of grease control equipment maintenance or cleaning at facility Escalation of Enforcement a. 1 incident within 24 month period 0 Issue NCN b. 2 incidents within 24 month period 1 Issue NOV e. 3 incidents within 24 month period 2 d. 4 incidents within 24 month period 3 e. 5 incidents within 24 month period 3 6. Failure to allow access for inspectors to adequately assess grease control equipment 7. Safety hazard at grease control equipment area (i.e. missing manhole cover, manhole cover damages or not made of material of suitable strength) 8. Facility in violation of numerical FOG limit a. FOG concentration in excess of limit but less than 2x limit b. FOG concentration between 2x -4x limit 1 c. FOG concentration in excess of 4x limit 2 9. Facility using additives or chemicals that emulsify or otherwise cause FOG to be discharged to the City sewer system 10. Failure of new facility or existing establishment that upgrades their facility, to notify Department, or submit Grease Control Equipment Inquiry or FOG Plan information 11. Missing or damaged sewer cleanout covers, or any rainfall inflow to Department sewer Department pumps GCE & Charges FSE $1,000 Issue NOV - $100 Issue NOV - $250 Issue NOV - $500 4 Show Cause Order 1 Notify Health Department/City Codes Department and issue NCN Issue NOV - $100 Issue NOV - $250 Issue NOV - min. $300 - $500 3 Show Cause Order 1 Issue NOV & require GCE 8

Incident Category Level a. 1 st Notification 0 b. 2 nd Notification 1 c. 3 rd Notification (repeat fine after every 15 days if unresolved) 3 Action Taken Issue NCN 30 day Issue NOV 15 day Issue NOV - $500 9

ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE PLAN FOR MULTI-DWELLING UNITS/GREASE-RELATED SEWER OVERFLOWS AND OBSTRUCTIONS Fayetteville Public Utilities regulates grease management through their State approved Pretreatment Program under Fats, Oils, & Grease (FOG) Management. The Department has made great strides reducing the commercial grease-related overflows to the low single digits annually. Grease-related overflows caused by residential customers are now the source of most of the grease restrictions. Single family residential customers are identified and educated on proper grease disposal. The multi-dwelling units (MDUs), including apartment buildings, however must be addressed through the property management or owners. Since the MDU owns the private infrastructure and the private sewer services, they must be held responsible for the restriction in the Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW). The Fayetteville Sewer Use Ordinance states: Prohibited Pollutants 1. No person shall introduce into the publicly owned treatment works any of the following pollutants which, acting either alone or in conjunction with other substances present in the POTW, interfere with the operation of the POTW as follows: 2. Solid or viscous pollutants in amounts which cause obstruction to the flow of the sewers, or other interference with the operation of or which cause injury to the POTW, including waxy or other materials which tend to coat and clog a sewer line or other appurtenances thereto; Therefore, the Department will actively pursue repeat violators under this Code. The Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) will proceed as follows (all offenses within a 5 year period); 1 st Offense Require MDU to distribute educational flyers (i.e. grease, roots, etc.) on prohibitive discharges and proper maintenance to all present tenants and new tenants as lease is signed. Must provide Fayetteville Public Utilities with a sample copy. 2 nd Offense Order & Assessment issued with a $200. 00 plus cost of restriction/overflow removal* charged to MDU. 3 rd Offense Order & Assessment issued with a $400. 00 plus cost of restriction/overflow removal* charged to MDU. 4 th Offense Order & Assessment issued with an $800. 00 plus cost of restriction/overflow removal* charged to MDU. 5 th Offense Order & Assessment issued to install pretreatment equipment to prevent continuation of Non-compliance. Failure to comply with an ERP will result in escalation of enforcement under the Pretreatment Program which may include monetary penalties up to $10,000/day and/or termination of services. *Cost of restriction/overflow may include some or all actions involved in investigation and resolution of the flow restriction. 10