WEST BENGAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

Similar documents
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 204 OF 2006

VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, MOTI-DAMAN RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005 (SECTION 4) PUBLICATION OF 17 MANUALS OF SUO-MOTU PUBLICATION MANUAL 1

Inspector Wakf Recruitment 2015 (Exam Code : IW 15)

Final Report. Training Programme. for. Capacity Building of the Group-D Staffs (including Safai Karmacharis) On Hospital Sanitation.

It defines basic terms and lists basic principles that all LSUHSC-NO faculty, staff, residents and students must understand and follow.

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Margaret Tuomi Chairperson Zahir Hirji, RN Angela Verrier, RPN

Ontario Nurses Association Position Statement on The Generic Health-Care Worker

The investigation of a complaint by Mr D against Cwm Taf University Health Board. A report by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales Case:

Before Shri Prakash Javadekar, Hon ble Minister for Human Resource Development, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt of India, New Delhi.

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

NOTIFICATION BOARD EXAMINATION - DGNM JULY / AUGUST 2016 SESSION DIRECTORATE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, KILPAUK, CHENNAI-10

Running head: JOURNAL THREE 1

Alumni Foundation Database

Investigating Committee Substantive Hearing Fraudulent/Incorrect Entry 14 November Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE

Caregivingin the Labor Force:

Inpatient Experience Survey 2016 Results for Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

Inpatient Experience Survey 2016 Results for Western General Hospital, Edinburgh

This summary of the Discipline Committee s Decision and Reason for Decision is published pursuant to the Discipline Committee s penalty order.

Study Abroad Student Participation Agreement

VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE Lexington, Virginia. GENERAL ORDER) NUMBER 48) 11 July 2018 CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECK POLICY

Reasons for the substantive hearing of the Conduct and Competence Committee panel held at NMC, 61 Aldwych, London on March 2011

Inpatient Patient Experience Survey 2014 Results for NHS Grampian

Attending Physician Statement- Total and Permanent Disability

National Patient Experience Survey Mater Misericordiae University Hospital.

Indexed as: Valencia (Re) THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO

Family name. First name. Date of birth. Address. Phone number. . Degree programme. Date of admission process.

CHILD PROTECTION POLICY

L Ecole Culinaire Memphis

The Case of the Mixed-Up Data Teacher Information

OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION APRIL 24, 2015

NORTHWEST TERRITORIES INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER Review Recommendation File: July 13, 2015

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

VOLUME VII CHAPTER 40:04 - FIRE SERVICE: SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION INDEX TO SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION

Inpatient Experience Survey 2016 Results for Dr Gray's Hospital, Elgin

Nursing and Midwifery Council:

Section II: DISCLOSURE

But how do you measure levels of restriction?

Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE Lexington, Virginia GENERAL ORDER) NUMBER 66) 15 November 2016

Surveyors Ombudsman Service. Customer Satisfaction 2010

Employee Assistance Professionals Association of South Africa: an Association for Professionals in the field of Employee Assistance Programmes

Gerry Bennett Ward (Mile End Hospital) - Enter and View Report

Request for Proposal: Alton Middle School NETWORK CABLING

Glengarry Rest Home and Hospital Resident Satisfaction Survey Results 2013

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 28/02/ /03/2018

National Patient Experience Survey UL Hospitals, Nenagh.

PATIENT QUESTIONNAIRE Please help us make hospital care better.

Lorne Slotnick, Arbitrator

Health Professions Review Board

PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMAN WALES PROGRESS WITH CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANS. Assistant Director of Patient Safety & Quality

Conduct and Competence Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing. 11 December Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE

WELCOME. Payment will be expected at the time of service. Please remember our 24 hour cancellation notice.

Justice Committee. Apologies (Scotland) Act 2016 (Excepted Proceedings) Regulations Written submission from the Nursing and Midwifery Council

Exeter City Council. The Local Government Ombudsman s Annual Review. for the year ended 31 March 2009

Patient Satisfaction A case study of zonal hospital, Mandi (HP)

Quality Improvement Project Control Report Out

London Borough of Southwark

DUTY TO CARE SCENARIO SCENARIO MB PHEN Safety, Risk and Ethics in Bariatric Health Care

Need for Investigation of Shelley Sella, MD, George R. Tiller, MD, and Women s Health Care Services in the Abortion of Michelle Armesto (Berge)

DME Competitive Bidding Case manager/discharge Planner Satisfaction Survey Better Same Worse Comment Totals 416 Yes and No Question's Yes Comment

NOTIFICATION BOARD EXAMINATION - DGNM JANUARY / FEBRUARY 2018 SESSION DIRECTORATE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, KILPAUK, CHENNAI-10

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS UNDER THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT

Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. On: 30 January Review Date: January Corporate / Directorate. Department Responsible for Review:

TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Agency/, Petitioner, Vs. RICKY FRANK, Grievant/, Respondent

Health Professions Review Board

9 Calculating the fee for persons covered by statutory health insurance and those entitled to medical care 8

Standards conduct, accountability

A visitor s guide to the Intensive Care Unit

RRC SAMPLE MATERIAL THE FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTH AND SAFETY LEARNING OUTCOMES

Minnesota Patients Bill of Rights

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES, Petitioner, vs. ANTWAN RILEY, Grievant

Part(s) of the register: Registered nurse sub part 2 Adult nursing L2 October 1980 Registered nurse sub part 1 Adult nursing L1 Sept 1998

Application for Teacher s Certificate of Qualification

Review Date 01/07/2014 Director of Nursing, Midwifery and Quality Expiry Date 10/07/2015 Withdrawn Date

Case 3:06-cv DAK Document 24 Filed 04/06/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

PRIVACY BREACH MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES. Ministry of Justice Access and Privacy Branch

Mandatory Disclosure

Planning in Advance for Future Health Care Choices Advance Care Planning Information & Guide

FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION November 14, 2017

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Mental Health Evaluations of Members of the Armed Forces

Minnesota Patients Bill of Rights

5 Years On: How has the Francis Report changed leadership in NHS hospitals? Easy Guide

PWD Buildings, Block A [Ground Floor], Khadya Bhawan Complex, 11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata Advertisement No. 01/2018. No.

A guide to your right to make an. Advance Directive

RULE PROPOSALS INTERESTED PERSONS

INQUEST INTO THE DEATH OF: MARIE TANNER

Veterans without Benefits: Discharge Status and Healthcare Disparities. Types of Military Discharges. Administrative Discharges 10/23/12

Guidelines for Disclosure Process. 1) Patient disclosure does not include:

DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS, BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING

CMS Will Show No Mercy:

Renal cancer surgery patient experience February 2014-February 2015

Allotment of Civic Volunteers per unit

Brookfield Nursing Home

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Freedom to speak up: raising concerns (whistleblowing) policy

RESPONSIBILITIES OF HOSPITALS AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES FOR ELDERLY PATIENTS

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Maryland MOLST FAQs. Maryland MOLST Training Task Force

Independent investigation into the death of Mr Andrew Liddle a prisoner at HMP Birmingham on 7 November 2016

Alabama. Phone. Agency. Department of Public Health, Bureau of Health Provider Standards (334) Contact Kelley Mitchell (334)

Transcription:

WEST BENGAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION File No.1585/WBHRC/COM/2008-2009 P r e s e n t 1. Mr. Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly - Chairperson 2. Mr. Justice N.C. Sil - Member 3. Mr. S.N. Roy - Member A news report appeared in Aajkal, a Bengali daily newspaper on 02-2-2009 wherein it was stated that one patient named Md. Samsuddin aged about 55 years got admitted in Chandannagore Hospital on 29-1-2009. But from the wee hours at about 5 a.m. on 31-1-2009 he was found missing. A search was made but he remained untraced. Subsequently, on 01-2-2009 around noon his dead body was found by the local people on the eastern side of a tank located within the hospital campus. Considering the gravity of the reported incident, Commission took suo motu cognizance of the matter and directed the Chief Medical Officer of Health, Hooghly to cause an enquiry and submit report in the matter. 2. C.M.O.H., Hooghly forwarded a report of enquiry conducted by Dy.CMOH I, Hooghly who happened to be the Chairman of the Enquiry Committee. In his report the incident was confirmed and it was stated that the patient was admitted at 6.30 A.M. on 29-1-2009 and subsequently was found missing on 31-1-2009 at 5 a.m. From the records, statement and circumstantial evidence, the Committee

2 came to the Inference that Amarjit Routh an attendant who was engaged by the relatives of the patient lost all contact with the patient and it was he who first took notice of the missing of the patient. Subsequently, necessary search was made in the campus by hospital authorities without any result. Ultimately, the dead body of the patient was found by the local people in the pond around noon on 01-2-2009. He also came to the conclusion that the Chandannagore Sub Divisional Hospital authority did their best but they had no control over the unfortunate incident that occurred on the day of 31-1-2009 and 01-2-2009. 3. The Commission considered the report sent by C.M.O.H., Hooghly and decided to examine the following persons:- i. Anmarjit Routh, Attendant, Chandannagar S.D. Hospital ii. Dr. Saibal Banerjee, Dy. CMOH I, Hooghly iii. Dr. Asim Kumar Pramanik, Superintendent, Cahdannagar S.D.Hospital iv. Dr. Bhushan Chakrabarti, the then CMOH, Hooghly 4. Amarjit Routh, Attendant, Chandannagar S.D. Hospital stated in his evidence that he was not a hospital employee. He is a private person. He works as an attendant to some private patients who are willing to engage him as an attendant. In the instant case, he was engaged by the family of the deceased to work as attendant for the night. He further stated that he was at the bedside of the patient and when he went to the toilet, the patient escaped.

3 5. Dr. Saibal Banerjee, Dy.CMOH I, Hooghly stated in his evidence that he was the Chairman of the Enquiry Committee constituted by the then CMOH, Hooghly. He admitted that the hospital employees including attending nurses and concerned Gr. D staff and the Darwans are responsible for absconding of any patient from his bed. He also admitted that he had not mentioned in his report the persons who should be held responsible for the incident. 6. Dr. Asim Kumar Pramanik, Superintendent, Chandannagar S.D. Hospital stated in his evidence that he was in the same post since 2008. He made a startling disclosure in course of his evidence that on an average two patients escape from the hospital without being released and thus every year about 700 such cases take place for which police have to be informed about the escape of such patients. However, later on he stated that the aforesaid figure of 700 cases of escape was not correct and he expressed his regret for making such a wrong statement. On the day of the incident, there were one staff nurse and one Gr. D in the ward and also there was a Darwan in the main gate and the collapsible gate was closed at night. 7. Dr. Bhushan Chakrabarti presently posted as Assistant Director of Health Services was posted as C.M.O.H., Hooghly at the relevant point of time. He admitted that it is not definitely a normal incident that a patient, after having been admitted in a hospital, escaped from his bed and thereafter his dead body was found floating in the pond in the campus of the hospital. He confirmed that he did

4 not enquire into the matter personally nor did he cause any enquiry at any point of time independently prior to the direction of the West Bengal Human Rights Commission. After receiving the direction of the Commission, he asked Dy.CMOH for conducting an enquiry. He was also not aware whether any enquiry was conducted by the Superintendent, Chandannagar S.D. Hospital. Dr. Bhushan Chakrabarti further stated in his evidence that it appeared from the record that the patient had been suffering from partial paralysis. He was unable to indicate the distance of the pond in which the dead body was floating from the hospital bed. He also could not say in which floor the patient was admitted. 8. The evidence of the three doctors, the then CMOH, Hooghly, Dy.CMOH I, Hooghly who conducted the enquiry and the Superintendent, Chandannagar S.D. Hospital constitute a very sad and depressing commentary on the functioning of the Health set-up in Hooghly at the relevant point of time. A patient suffering from partial paralysis was noticed missing from his bed at 5 a.m. on 31-1-209 and ultimately his dead body was found by local people floating in the pond around noon on 01-2-2009. The Dy.CMOH I submitted an enquiry report which was not only perfunctory but gave a clean chit to the Chandannagar S.D. Hospital that they did their best. He only held Amarjit Routh, a private person engaged by the patient s party as an attendant solely responsible for the incident. In the evidence before the Commission he admitted that the employees including attending nurses

5 and the concerned Gr. D and the Darwan were responsible for absconding of the said patient from his bed. He also admitted his shortcomings in preparing the report without fixing any responsibility on the nursing staff, concerned Gr. D personnel and the Darwans. Thus, Dr. Saibal Banerjee submitted a misleading report to the Commission and tried to shield the hospital employees and passed on the buck to a private attendant engaged by the patient s party. His conduct is certainly unbecoming of a responsible government official. 9. The Superintendent of Chandannagar S.D. Hospital does not seem to have any clue as to what has been happening in his hospital. He has been in the post since 2008 and the incident occurred on 31-1-2009. In his evidence as has already been noted he initially stated that on an average 700 patients escaped from his hospital every year. Later on, he withdrew his statement. He admitted in the evidence that there were one staff nurse, General Duty Attendant in the ward and one Darwan in the main gate and the collapsible gate was closed at night. The Superintendent did not make any enquiry nor did he call for an explanation from any of the staff and was thus guilty of gross dereliction of duty. 10. The conduct of Dr. Bhushan Chakrabarti who was CMOH of the district is equally reprehensible. From his evidence, it is clear that he had no idea not only about this matter but also about Chandannagar S.D.Hospital in general. He could not say the distance of the pond in which the dead body of the patient was floating

6 from the hospital bed. He stated in his evidence that Chandannagar Hospital is a three-storied building but he could not say in which floor the Surgical Ward is situated. He did not enquire whether post mortem report was collected. He neither enquired into the matter nor caused any enquiry independently prior to the direction of the West Bengal Human Rights Commission. However, when Dy.CMOH I submitted his enquiry report, CMOH simply forwarded the same to the Commission without any application of mind. He also admitted in his evidence that no action was taken against any staff of the hospital. His evidence gives ample indication that he was least interested in his job and thus guilty of gross dereliction of duty. 11. From a careful analysis of the facts and circumstances of the case, the evidence and materials on record, it is clear that all these three senior Health Officials, C.M.O.H., Hooghly, Dy. CMOH I, Hooghly and Superintendent of the Chandannagar S.D. Hospital are guilty of gross dereliction of duty and they are utterly negligent in preventing violation of Human rights of the deceased person. The Commission feels that stringent action needs to be taken against these three officers to send out a clear message to the doctors working in the hospital that such callous, negligent and utterly irresponsible conduct would be dealt with a heavy hand in the interest of providing proper health care to the citizens of the country.

7 12. Accordingly, the Commission recommends that disciplinary proceedings be immediately instituted against all these three Health Officers, namely, I. Dr. Bhushan Chakrabarti, the then CMOH, Hooghly II. Dr. Saibal Banerjee, Dy. CMOH I, Hooghly and III. Dr. Asim Kumar Pramanik, Superintendent, Chadannagar S.D.Hospital, Dist Hooghly. 12. The Government should intimate the Commission about the action taken or proposed to be taken on the recommendations within a period of two months from the date of communication. sd/- sd/- sd/- ( S.N. Roy ) ( Justice N.C. Sil ) ( Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly ) Member Member Chairperson Dated: Kolkata, the 3 rd July, 2012

8 Comments of the State Government will be uploaded as and when received. Sd/- (03/07/2012) (J. Sundara Sekhar) Secretary & CEO