COMBAT SYSTEMS EVALUATION LABORATORY

Similar documents
NEW THREAT UPGRADE PROGRAM

SSC Pacific is making its mark as

Standard Missile: Snapshots in Time Captured by Previous Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest Articles

9 th Annual Disruptive Technologies Conference

Capabilities Presentation

Trusted Partner in guided weapons

Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM

AVW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Introduction. Contents. A Legacy Article January 2017

ARLEIGH BURKE (DDG 51) CLASS GUIDED MISSILE DESTROYER WITH THE AN/SPY-1D RADAR

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM

ARCHIVED REPORT. SSQ-72/108(V) (OUTBOARD/OUTBOARD II) - Archived 7/2002. Outlook. Orientation. Electronic Warfare Forecast

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Subj: CERTIFICATION OF THE AVIATION CAPABILITY OF SHIPS OPERATING AIRCRAFT

General Dynamics Awarded $66 Million for Planning Yard Services for DDG 51 and FFG 7 Ships

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

First Announcement/Call For Papers

Joint Electronics Type Designation Automated System

Lessons in Innovation: The SSBN Tactical Control System Upgrade

Marine Air Command and Control System Handbook

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

The Integral TNO Approach to NAVY R&D

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 31 Oct Subj: NAVY ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY AND STANDARDS

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

AN OPERATIONAL COMPUTER PROGRAM TO CONTROL SELF DEFENSE SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM OPERATIONS

C4I System Solutions.

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: ASW Systems Development

Russian defense industrial complex s possibilities for development of advanced BMD weapon systems

NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements FY15 FY17

Strike Group Defender: PMR-51 and MIT Lincoln Laboratory

FFG UPGRADE Brochure Delivering tag integrated line warfare solutions.

NAVY AREA THEATER BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (NATBMD)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

Low Altitude Air Defense (LAAD) Gunner's Handbook

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Air Control

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

Navy Aegis Cruiser and Destroyer Modernization: Background and Issues for Congress

Analysis of Interface and Screen for Ground Control System

CERTIFICATION OF THE AVIATION CAPABILITY OF SHIPS OPERATING AIRCRAFT

Amphibious Ships and Landing Craft Data Book

U.S. ARMY AIR DEFENSE DIGEST

Request for Solutions: Distributed Live Virtual Constructive (dlvc) Prototype

The Verification for Mission Planning System

ARMY MULTIFUNCTIONAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM-LOW VOLUME TERMINAL 2 (MIDS-LVT 2)

F-35 Lightning II EOTS Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control 2015 Supplier Summit TM

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited

ARLEIGH BURKE DESTROYERS. Delaying Procurement of DDG 51 Flight III Ships Would Allow Time to Increase Design Knowledge

NAVY AREA THEATER BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (NATBMD)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9

The Coastal Systems Station Strategic Perspective

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Section 7.5 PEO LS Program GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #161

OPNAVINST L N96 30 Mar Subj: REQUIREMENTS FOR AIR CAPABLE AND AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIPS TO OPERATE AIRCRAFT

Apache Fire Control LM MFC Supplier Summit TM

The Road Ahead. Richard W. Constantine and Richard J. Prengaman THREAT ADVANCES TECHNOLOGY INSERTION

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support

DATE: FY 2016 President's Budget February 2015 PRIOR YR FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 TO COMP TOTAL PROG QUANTITY

THE TALOS SHIP SYSTEM

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements. Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited.

Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157)

OPNAVINST DNS 25 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

Integrating Battlefield Objects of C4ISR Systems by Using CAPS

Air Defense System Solutions.

Revision of DoD Design Criteria Standard: Noise Limits (MIL-STD-1474) Award Winner: ARL Team

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

CRS Report for Congress

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

SPS-TA THALES AIRBORNE SYSTEMS INTEGRATED SELF-PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR TRANSPORT AND WIDE-BODY AIRCRAFT.

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Briefing for Industry

COTS Impact to RM&S from an ISEA Perspective

PART THREE. Operational-Level Support. Chapter 8 Signal Support BATTLEFIELD INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE

CEC: Sensor Netting with Integrated Fire Control

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM (NAS)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Serving as specialists in cyber communications CRYPTOLOGY TECHNICIAN

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Bath Iron Works Awarded Potential $102 Million Navy Contract for Post Shakedown Availabilities on DDG 51-Class Ships in West Coast Homeports

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

Fire Support Systems.

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Development and Management of Interactive Courseware (ICW) for Military Training

Transcription:

DENNIS P. SERPICO COMBAT SYSTEMS EVALUATION LABORATORY The Combat Systems Evaluation Laboratory, a major facility at APL, is used for concept evaluation, design, and testing of shipboard radars, combat systems, and associated displays and interfaces. It enables APL to investigate the full spectrum of missile system control concepts from command and control through missile performance. INTRODUCTION The Combat Systems Evaluation Laboratory (CSEL) is a facility for the development and evaluation of advanced combat system concepts and prototypes for Navy surface ships. (Another major APL facility is the Guidance System Evaluation Laboratory.') CSEL provides a working environment of actual military equipment in which new technology, new concepts, or improvements can be tested in existing Navy systems. It also allows APL's development work to be demonstrated to the Navy and other groups outside APL. The center is a unique tool for performing human factors engineering; man-machine interaction research; display development; Combat Information Center (CIC) layout design; and combat system design, development, and evaluation. CSEL has been closely tied to the development of the AEGIS combat System and has met the evaluation requirements of the AEGIS program during that system's evolution. Concepts developed and evaluated in the facility include the Advanced Multi-Function Array Radar (AMFAR), command displays, automatic detection and tracking techniques for radar systems, and sensor management. Current efforts concentrate on extending these and other combat system concepts to the level of Battle Group operations. CSEL has grown from a few consoles with limited computer support to the current configuration, which employs a substantial number of operational consoles, sophisticated tactical computers, and a large complex of tactical display equipment. The present facility is housed in two areas: the Operations Center, which contains the consoles and tactical display equipment, and the Computer Center, which contains the support computers and peripherals. In its entirety, CSEL represents a considerable capital investment in equipment, the major portion of which has been furnished to APL under direct AEGIS project sponsorship. OPERATIONS CENTER The CSEL Operations Center contains much of the tactically significant equipment found in a shipboard CIC and serves as a demonstration vehicle for many CSEL activities. Figure 1 is a cutaway view of the Op- Vlill/III > 2. N I/lllber4, 198 1 erations Center. Two types of display console (ANI UYA-4 and AN/ UYQ-21) are represented in the Operations Center. A central element in the Center is the AEGIS command display complex (Fig. 2), consisting of four large-screen displays, ten TV monitors, and two command consoles. Mock-ups are also included in the Center to simulate some of the operational equipment normally found in a CIC. This permits layout investigations to be conducted realistically. The Operations Center contains approximately 2100 square feet of floor space, which allows it to be arranged like anyone of a number of different ship class CIC's. At this time, the Center is arranged like an AEGIS cruiser Combat Information Center. The utility support for the Operations Center includes 60- and 400-hertz power, cooling water, air conditioning, and overhead conventional white and shipboard blue lighting. The utilities can be rearranged with minimal rework within a short period of time (three to five days). A false floor provides access to the 60- and 400-hertz power networks and the cooling water supply. Both the blue and white overhead lighting installations are controlled on a quadrant basis to allow varying light levels throughout the Operations Center. Computerized simulations of tactical environments are available to support the evaluation and demonstration activities in the Operations Center. The Combat Environment Generator Program uses CSEL's computers to simulate targets, sensors, weapons, and events external to the decision-making, combat-direction core of the combat system. A new, upgraded simulation capability is being developed to support CSEL applications in the 1980's. The intent of the upgrade is to expand from a functional model of Battle Group operations (i.e., one that primarily supports the investigation of single ship system considerations) to a model that treats the Battle Group as a system. This upgraded simulator will make it possible to analyze the effectiveness of overall Battle Group operations such as antiair warfare coordination. COMPUTER CENTER Although the Operations Center is the more visible part of CSEL, the heart of the facility is the Com- 321

A AN/UY A-4 console 8 AN/UYO-21 console C o Command console, Large screen displays, Automated status boards AN/UYO-21 liqu id crystal large screen display projector Figure 1 - GSEL Operations Center. The Operations Center contains much of the tactically significant equipment found in a shipboard Combat Information Center (GIG). It was used as an aid in determining the layout of AEGIS GIG'S. The Operations Center is currently arranged as an AEGIS cruiser GIG. puter Center where CSEL users do most of their dayto-day work. The Computer Center contains the computers that drive the tactical consoles and provide for computer program development. Figure 3 is a cutaway view of the Computer Center. The Center contains a variety of computers used in the surface Navy, including the AN/ UYK-7 (single-bay and fourbay configurations), the AN/UYK-20, and two computers of the CP-642 series (a UNIVAC 1230 and an AN/USQ-20(V)). A number of peripherals, induding disk drives, terminals, line printers, card readers, card punches, and magnetic tape units, are also available in the Center. Table 1 lists the equipment in the Computer Center. 322 The UYK-7 and UYK-20 computers are third-generation computers that are currently used for the bulk of the modern Navy's nonavionic tactical processing. They have been designated as the standard embedded computers by the Chief of Naval Material. The UYK7 computer is a multiple processor system, designed for military applications, that can be assembled to meet medium or large system requirements. It is designed to operate as a single processor or multiple processor system. The UYK-20(V) is a general-purpose militarized computer in a small, rugged package designed to meet the requirements of small-and medium-sized applications in shipboard, mobile shelter, or other military environments. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest

Figure 2 - Command display complex. The AEGIS Combat Information Center will include a command display complex. This center functions as an information management system designed to support ownship command and the Battle Group Antiair Warfare Commander. It consists of four large-screen displays, ten alphanumeric displays, and four console-mounted high-resolution graphics monitors. Table 1 CSEL COMPUTER CENTER EQUIPMENT Computers AN/ UYK-7, four bay AN/ UYK-7, single bay with extended memory AN/ UYK-20 UNIVAC 1230 AN/ U SQ-20 UNIVAC 492 Disk Systems CDC 9766 disk drive (2), SI 9500 controller CDC 9762 disk drive (2), SI 9500 controller Magnetic Tape Systems UNIVAC III c (5), seven track Ampex TM 1629 (4), seven track UNIVAC RD-358 (2), nine track UNIVAC 1840 (2), seven track BUCODE 4025 (2), nine track RD-243 (2), seven track Punched Card Equipment IBM 360120,2560 card reader/ punch Peripheral dynamics card reader Printer IBM 1403 (NI) Data Products 2470 UNIVAC COP printer Volume 2. Number 4. 1981 The CP-642 computers, typical of the computers in current ships of the line, are earlier generation units designed for real-time military applications such as missile guidance and tactical control and display. While the UYK-7 and UYK-20 computers are used for most of the new tactical programs in the Computer Center, the CP-642 computers are still heavily used for simulation and data reduction. In addition to tactical computer systems, the Computer Center contains SHARE17, a multiprocessor time-sharing system on the UYK-7 computer, which was developed by the Fleet Combat Direction Systems Support Activity at San Diego. SHARE17 is designed to support the efficient development and maintenance of tactical data system software and is widely used throughout the Navy community. It provides the user with a wide range of software within an on-line, interactive environment. The computer system's monitor program, contained in the UYK-7 computer at all times, is the central unit of the operating system that provides such services as resource allocation and job scheduling. An executive program is also included in the system-supplied software. This program is the prime interface between the user and the remainder of the subsystems, which include a text editor, on-line debugging aids, a background processing capability, a text formatter, and a variety of compilers, assemblers, loaders, and simulators. With SHARE17, computer programs can be written for the UYK-7, the UYK-20, and the CP-642 series of Navy computers. INTERFACES CSEL interacts with other major facilities at APL, including the Radar and Weapon Control Evaluation Center, the Embedded Computer System Evaluation Laboratory, and the Computer Aided Programming Facility. The Radar and Weapon Control Evaluation 323

B 1230 and AN/USQ-20 (V) C High speed disk units D Four bay AN/UYK-7 computers E AN/UYK-20 computer Figure 3 - CSEL Computer Center. The Computer Center contains the computers necessary to drive the tactical consoles in the Operations Center and to host computer program development. Specifically, the Center contains AN/UYK-7, both single bay and four bay configurations, AN/UYK-20, UNIVAC 1230, and AN/USQ-20 computers. Center includes several Fleet operational radars as well as the TERRIER and TARTAR Weapon Control Systems. The Embedded Computer System Evaluation Laboratory is used for software development such as the computer programs for the AN/ SYS-l Integrated Automatic Detection and Tracking System The Computer Aided Programming facility is used as an aid in software development (usijlg PASCAL, FORTRAN, and CMS-2 programming languages). The interfaces include the New Threat Upgrade facility located at APL ; the AEGIS Combat System Engineering and Development Site at Moorestown, N. 1.; 324 and the Fleet Combat Direction Systems Support Activity at Dam Neck, Va. APPLICATIONS CSEL has been closely tied to the development of the AEGIS Combat System and has met the evaluation requirements of the AEGIS program during that system's evolution. The facility was upgraded during 1978 to accommodate the mock-up and investigation of larger Combat Information Center arrangements associated with AEGIS cruisers and destroyers. Not all CSEL applications, however, have been AEGIS Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digesl

related. The facility also has been used for the development and evaluation of a Coast Guard harbor traffic control system and Federal Aviation Administration en route and terminal air traffic control systems as well as non-aegis Navy programs. Currently, a major user of the facility is the Battle Group Antiair Warfare Coordination Program, an extension of AEGIS activities. The following paragraphs describe in greater detail some of the major applications of the CSEL facility to date. AEGIS Combat System Concepts-CSEL was used to develop and demonstrate command and decision organization and techniques to the Navy through the use of prototype computer programs. Many of the tactical command concepts demonstrated by these programs have been incorporated into the AEGIS Command and Decision Program and the Battle Group Antiair Warfare Coordination Program. Advanced Radar Development-The Advanced Multi-Function Array Radar, developed at APL, was tested and evaluated in the CSEL. This radar demonstrated advanced signal processing and encoding techniques and served as a baseline design for the AEGIS AN/ SPY-l radar. The computer control processes developed for this radar served as the model for AEGIS radar control programs. Command Displays-Command display definition is an ongoing task in CSEL. Working sessions, attended by both active and retired Naval personnel, are frequently held in the Operations Center. These sessions evaluate display format, content, and general flow in a realistic shipboard environment supported by CSEL's simulation capability. Combat Information Center Arrangement-CSEL has been used over the past decade to model the structure of Combat Information Center layouts of nuclear and nonnuclear AEGIS cruiser and destroyer variants. It has been useful in focusing the efforts of the Navy and the contractor design team. Data Reduction-CSEL is able to reduce and play back AEGIS sea-based test data from the USS NORTON SOUND and land-based test data from the AEGIS Combat System Engineering and Development Site. This capability has been used as a demonstration of the unique features of AEGIS, as a source of realistic data to be used in the development and evaluation of other CSEL activities, and as a troubleshooting aid during early AEGIS development. Automatic Detection and Tracking ProcessingAPL is a leader in radar automatic detection and tracking processing. CSEL has been used to develop, test, and evaluate automatic detection and tracking techniques for the Navy, the Coast Guard, and the Federal Aviation Administration. Advanced prototypes of the AN/SYS-l and AN/SYS-2 computer programs were developed in CSEL to demonstrate the process before the Navy requested contractor bids for the production systems. Battle Group Antiair Warfare Coordination-As part of this program, a land-based development model is being assembled in CSEL prior to an at-sea Volume 2, NU/nber4, 198/ demonstration and evaluation. This model extends the automatic control techniques proven in AEGIS development to the Battle Group. The model provides the Antiair Warfare Commander with an information management system and a means to monitor and control his resources effectively in a rapidly changing antiair warfare environment. New Technology-CSEL is frequently employed to demonstrate and evaluate the application of new technology to shipboard use. Technological advancements under investigation include microcomputers, data buses, electronic switching, fiber optics, display techniques, software tools, computer-generated speech, and distributed processing. New Navy Equipment Evaluation-As an independent laboratory, APL is contracted by the Navy to evaluate new equipment developed by commercial contractors. This is done by integrating the equipment into CSEL operations and evaluating it from a systems standpoint. Currently under evaluation in the Operations Center are the Hughes Aircraft Corp. AN/ UYQ-21 large-screen display projector, tactical console, and display driver unit. Area display devices and, in particular, large-screen display projectors have been incorporated into the Operations Center for several years. An effort related to the projector evaluation investigates the utility of various display driver units. In addition to the Hughes unit, commercially available RAMTEK 9400 / 50 and 9400/ 80 units are currently under evaluation. In the Computer Center, APL will be evaluating the AN / UYK-43 Engineering Development Models. The AN/ UYK-43 is a general-purpose digital computer intended to replace the currently operational AN / UYK-7 computer. APL will provide the Navy with recommendations as to the relative merits and suitability of the AN/ UYK-43 computer for operational use. Software Development-CSEL has the capability to develop and maintain computer programs written in the standard Navy high-level computer language, CMS-2. Since Navy tactical combat systems presently being designed and built are largely computer controlled, computer software is needed to develop and evaluate these systems. A major support activity of CSEL is the development of an efficient capability to produce tactical software. Paramount among these tools is the SHARE17 operating system, which was installed in November 1977 and is performing adequately under present work loads. CONCLUSION The Combat Systems Evaluation Laboratory at APL has been used for over a decade to aid in the design and analysis of new radar, weapon, and command systems for the Navy and other government sponsors. It has provided a facility to prepare and run real-time computer control programs and to assist in testing the use of display equipment in shipboard weapon control systems. It has played a valuable role in the development of the AEGIS Combat 325

System by providing an operational mock-up of a Combat Information Center. Most recently, its improved computer-simulation capability has allowed expansion from evaluation of systems designed for a single ship to evaluation of systems designed to coordinate all the units of a Battle Group. CSEL's flexibility, especially its ability to interact with other facilities and its capacity to be upgraded with minimal effort, will continue to prove useful in the development and evaluation of future military equipment and concepts. REFERENCE IW. M. Gray and R. w. Witte, "Guidance System Evaluation Laboratory," Johns Hopkins APL Tech. Dig. 1, 144-147 (1980). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS-Throughout its history, the CSEL facility has been closely associated with the AEGIS program and, more recently, the Battle Group Antiair Warfare Coordination Program. Much of the equipment contained in the facility was obtained through the sponsors of these programs. The author wishes to thank Mr. E. Mardaga, Mr. E. C. Prettyman, Mr. L. G. Simon, and Dr. L. H. Zitzman for their contributions to the preparation of this article. 326 Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest