IMPACT - Connecting Nursing Facilities and Home Care to the Healthcare System of the Future

Similar documents
and the Movement Towards Acute Care Data Transfer June 5 th, 2013 Larry Garber, M.D. Reliant Medical Group George Richardson CIO, VNA Care Network

Implementing Health Information Exchange in the Long-term and Post Acute Care Community

Using Data to Promote Continuity of Care and Increase Accountability

Longitudinal Coordination of Care Overview to HL7 Patient Care WG. Wednesday, March 27 th, 2013

Project Narrative Improving Massachusetts Post Acute Care Transfers (IMPACT)

Improving Patient Health Through Real-Time ADT Integration

Improving Care Coordination by using Mass HIway Direct Messaging

Improving Financial & Clinical Performance Through Health Information Exchange & Enhanced Transitions

Thinking Ahead in Post Acute Care

Town Hall Meeting on Health

The Massachusetts ehealth Institute

USING ACUTE CARE PLANS TO IMPROVE COORDINATION AMONG ED HIGH UTILIZER PATIENTS MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL Publication Year: 2014

HIE Success - Physician Education Series

Health Information Technology Council May Meeting

Deriving Value from a Health Information Exchange. HIMSS17 DA-CH Community Conference Healthix I New York I February 20, 2017

YOUR HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Health Information Exchange Activities for LTPAC and Behavioral Health Communities

Welcome to Rochester RHIO s GET DIRECTed! Denise DiNoto Director of Community Services March 2014

Health Current: Roadmap Practice Transformation using Information & Data

CLINICAL INTEGRATION STRATEGY

How to Establish an Accountable Post-Acute Preferred Provider Network. November 14, 2016

Long-term & Post-Acute Care (LTPAC) Utilizing the Mass HIway

Winning at Care Coordination Using Data-Driven Partnerships

IMPROVING MEDICATION RECONCILIATION WITH STANDARDS

Overcome Challenges/Obstacles to Achieving Interoperability

June 25, Barriers exist to widespread interoperability

Nonprofit partnership. A grass roots organization where Board of Directors have vested interest in its success.

Continuity of Care Record (CCR)

TRANSITIONS of CARE. Francis A. Komara, D.O. Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine

Responsible Entity The owner of the project HealthShare Exchange of Southeastern Pennsylvania

Mass HIway Use Case Workshop. Sean Kennedy Mass ehealth Institute Director, Health Information Exchange

CareTrek : Nebraska s Journey to Safe Care Transitions

Community Health Centers. May 6, 2010

Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program -- Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017

Seamless Clinical Data Integration

One Medicine: Incorporating Population Health Principles and Best Practices into Clinical Workflow

Sutter Health. Steven Lane, MD, MPH, FAAFP Sutter EHR Ambulatory Physician Director

Meaningful use glossary and requirements table

Medical Home as a Platform for Population Health

Pulse on the Industry: Interoperability and Population Health Management

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Building Coordinated, Patient Centered Care Management Teams

HIE Data: Value Proposition for Payers and Providers

WHAT IT FEELS LIKE

The Joint Commission's Performance Measurement Journey

January 04, Submitted Electronically

Implementing Medicaid Value-Based Purchasing Initiatives with Federally Qualified Health Centers

EMPI Patient Matching Solution Product Use Cases: Epic Electronic Health Record Integration

Outcomes Measurement in Long-Term Care (LTC)

Quality Data Model (QDM) Style Guide. QDM (version MAT) for Meaningful Use Stage 2

Overview of the Changes to the Meaningful Use Program Called for in the Proposed Inpatient Prospective Payment System Rule April 27, 2018

Roadmap to accountable care: The chicken or the egg technology investment or clinical process improvement?

Integrating EMS for Care Coordination and Disaster Response March 3, 2016

CASE STUDY. An HIE-populated personal health record for cardiac revascularization patients

DSRIP Demonstration Year 1, Quarter 1-2 Domain 1 Patient Engagement Data Request

Care Integration and Network Models: How to Become a Player

Issue Brief. EHR-Based Care Coordination Performance Measures in Ambulatory Care

Adopting Accountable Care An Implementation Guide for Physician Practices

Preparing Your Infrastructure for New Payment Models

New Hampshire Health Information Organization Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

CareTrek : Nebraska s Journey to Safe Care Transitions

Patient-Centered Specialty Practice: Building the Medical Neighborhood

Health Information Exchange 101. Your Introduction to HIE and It s Relevance to Senior Living

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

2017 Quality Improvement Work Plan Summary

Ambulatory Interoperability - Proposed Final Criteria - Feb Either HL7 v2.4 or HL7 v2.5.1, LOINC

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD (EHR)

Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Health and Healthcare in Ohio through Technology

Calibrating your tablet allows you to ensure accuracy as you handwrite on the screen and/or select items on the screen. Prime Clinical Systems, Inc 1

Postacute care (PAC) cost variation explains a large part

SWAN Alerts and Best Practices for Improved Care Coordination

5/26/2015. January 26, 2015 INCENTIVES AND PENALTIES. Medicare Readmission Penalties. CMS Bundled Payment Providers & ACOs in NE

38 Unique Healthcare Organizations. Tioga. Crawford Wayne. Lycoming. Clinton. Union. Snyder. Juniata Perry. Huntingdon. Franklin.

Maryland s Integrated Care Network. Heading into Year Three

Copyright All Rights Reserved.

PERFORMANCE REPORTING & IMPROVEMENT A GLIMPSE AT THE SCC S PERFORMANCE MEASURES & DASHBOARDS AND ONLINE LEARNING CENTER

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Population Health. Collaborative Care. One interoperable platform. NextGen Care

Understanding MU 3 Requirements

Kentucky HIE Examples of Successful Interoperability Description Template

AGENDA. 1. Latest Developments in the NYP PPS. 4. NYC Primary Care Information Program (Anname Phann)

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Interoperability is Happening Now

Safe Transitions Best Practice Measures for

A Regional Approach to HIE

OASIS Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL)

Delaware Health Information Network Town Hall Wednesday, July 13, :00 a.m. 12:00 p.m.

Advancing Care Information Measures

Standardizing LTSS Assessments for State Initiatives

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

HIE-HIT Advisory Committee Kickoff Meeting. June 15, 2011 MTC Office, 2 Center Plaza, Suite 440, Boston

improvement program to Electronic Health variety of reasons, experts suggest that up to

Promoting Interoperability Measures

TEHDI CONTINUUM OF CARE FOR AUDIOLOGISTS

Care Everywhere Integrated Workgroup

Emerging Issues in Post Acute Care Trends

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

Transcription:

IMPACT - Connecting Nursing Facilities and Home Care to the Healthcare System of the Future MA Health Data Consortium CIO Forum January 17 th, 2013 Drs. Larry Garber and Terry O Malley

Agenda IMPACT addressing Long Term and Post- Acute Care (LTPAC) needs ONC s S&I Framework - Developing national standards for transitions of care datasets LAND & SEE software to facilitate integrating LTPAC into electronic health information exchanges (HIE) 2

IMPACT Grant February 2011 HHS/ONC awarded $1.7M HIE Challenge Grant to state of Massachusetts (MTC/MeHI): Improving Massachusetts Post-Acute Care Transfers (IMPACT) 3

IMPACT Objectives & Strategies Facilitate developing a national standard of data elements for transitions across the continuum of care Develop software tools to acquire/view/edit/send these data elements (LAND & SEE) Integrate and validate tools into Worcester County using Learning Collaborative methodology Measure outcomes 4

Developing National Standards to Support LTPAC Needs 5

Datasets for Care Transitions Traditionally What the sender thinks is important to the receiver Future Also take into account what the receiver says they need 6

Stakeholders/Contributors State (Massachusetts) MA Universal Transfer Form workgroup Boston s Hebrew Senior Life etransfer Form IMPACT learning collaborative participants MA Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors MA Wound Care Committee Home Care Alliance of MA (HCA) National NY s emolst Multi-State/Multi-Vendor EHR/HIE Interoperability Workgroup Substance Abuse, Mental Health Services Agency (SAMHSA) Administration for Community Living (ACL) Aging Disability Resource Centers (ADRC) National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare National Association for Homecare and Hospice (NAHC) Transfer of Care & CCD/CDA Consolidation Initiatives (ONC s S&I Framework) Longitudinal Coordination of Care Work Group (ONC S&I Framework) ONC Beacon Communities and LTPAC Workgroups Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE)/Geisinger MDS HIE Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)(MDS/OASIS/IRF-PAI/CARE) INTERACT (Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers)

Single dataset for all transitions? 175 element CCD 325 element IMPACT for basic LTPAC needs 480+ elements for Longitudinal Coordination of Care Many transitions don t need all data unnecessary sender work

14x14 Sender (left column) to Receiver (top) = 196 possibly transition types Transitions to (Receivers) In Patient ED Outpatient Behavioral LTAC IRF SNF/ECF HHA Hospice Amb Care EMS BH CBOs Patient/ Acute Care Services Health Community Transitions From (Senders) Hospitals Inpatient (PCP) Services Family Inpatient Acute Care Hospital Emergency Department Outpatient services Behavioral Health Inpatient Long Term Acute Care Hospital Inpatient Rehab Facility Skilled Nursing/Extended Care Home Health Agency Hospice Ambulatory Care (PCP, PCMH) Emergency Medical Services Behavioral Health Community Community Based Organizations Patient/Family 9

Prioritize Transitions by Volume, Clinical Instability and Time-Value of Information Transitions to (Receivers) In Patient ED Out patient LTAC IRF SNF/ECF HHA Hospice Amb Care CBOs Patient/ Transitions From (Senders) Services (PCP) Family V = H V = H V = H V = H V = H V = H V = H V = H In patient CI = H CI = H CI = M CI = M CI = L CI = M CI = L CI = M TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H V = H V = H V = H V = H V = M V = H V = M V = H ED CI = H CI = H CI = H CI = M CI = M CI = L CI = L CI = M TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H V = H V = H V = H V = H V = L V = H V = H Out patient services CI = H CI = M CI = M CI = M CI = L CI = L CI = L TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = L V = H V = H V = H V = M V = H V = H V = M V = H V = H V = H LTAC CI = H CI = H CI = H CI = M CI = M CI = M CI = M CI = M CI = M CI = M TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H V = H V = H V = H V = L V = H V = H V = L V = H V = H V = H IRF CI = H CI = H CI = M CI = H CI = L CI = L CI = M CI = L CI = L CI = L TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = H V = H V = H V = H V = M V = L V = L V = H V = M V = H V = H V = H SNF/ECF CI = H CI = H CI = M CI = H CI = M CI = M CI = M CI = M CI = L CI = M CI = L TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = M TV = M TV = M TV = H TV = M TV = M TV = H TV = H V = H V = H V = L V = M V = H V = H V = H HHA CI = H CI = H CI = L CI = L CI = L CI = L CI = L TV = H TV = H TV = L TV = L TV = L TV = L TV = L V = L V = M V = M V = L V = L V = L V = M V = L Hospice CI = H CI = H CI = M CI = L CI = L CI = M CI = L CI = M TV = H TV = H TV = M TV = M TV = M TV = L TV = L TV = M V = M V = H V = L V = M V = L V = L V = M V = L Ambulatory Care (PCP) CI = H CI = H CI = M CI = M CI = L CI = L CI = L CI = L TV = H TV = H TV = H TV = M TV = H TV = M TV = M TV = L 10 CBOs Patient/Family 10 Black circles = highest priority Green circles = high priority

Receiver Data Element Survey 1135 Transition surveys completed Largest survey of Receivers needs 46 Organizations completing evaluation 12 Different types of user roles 11

12 User Roles 12

Findings from Survey Identified for each transition which data elements are required, optional, or not needed Each of the data elements is valuable to at least one type of Receiver Many data elements are not valuable in certain care transition A single paper form can t represent this variability in data needs Can be grouped into 5 types of transitions 13

Five Transition Datasets 1. Report from Outpatient testing, treatment, or procedure 2. Referral to Outpatient testing, treatment, or procedure 3. Shared Care Encounter Summary (Office Visit, Consultation Summary, Return from the ED to the referring facility) 4. Consultation Request Clinical Summary (Referral to a consultant or the ED) 5. Permanent or long-term Transfer of Care to a different facility or care team or Home Health Agency 14

Five Transition Datasets Shared Care Encounter Summary: Office Visit to PHR Consultant to PCP ED to PCP, SNF, etc Consultation Request: PCP to Consultant PCP, SNF, etc to ED Transfer of Care: Hospital to SNF, PCP, HHA, etc SNF, PCP, etc to HHA PCP to new PCP 15

Five Transition Datasets Transitions to (Receivers) In Patient ED Out patient LTAC IRF SNF/ECF HHA Hospice Amb Care CBOs Patient/ Transitions From (Senders) Services (PCP) Family In patient ED Out patient services LTAC 5 3 5 1 IRF SNF?ECF 5 HHA Hospice Ambulatory Care (PCP) 5 4 2 CBOs 16 Patient/Family

Two Care Plan Datasets Consultation Request Transfer of Care Care Plan Shared Care Encounter Summary Home Health Plan of Care (CMS-485) 17

Testing the IMPACT Dataset 18

Pilot Sites to Test the Datasets 9/2011 Applications sent to 34 organizations Selection Criteria: High volume of patient transfers with other pilot sites Experience with Transitions of Care tools/initiatives 16 Winning Pilot Sites: St Vincent Hospital and UMass Memorial Healthcare Reliant Medical Group (formerly known as Fallon Clinic) and Family Health Center of Worcester (FQHC) 2 Home Health agencies (VNA Care Network & Overlook VNA) 1 Long Term Acute Care Hospital (Kindred Parkview) 1 Inpatient Rehab Facility (Fairlawn) 8 Skilled Nursing and Extended Care Facilities 19

IMPACT Learning Collaborative: Testing the Care Transitions Datasets 16 organization, 40 participants, 6 meetings over 2 months, and several hundred patient transfers 20

Learning Collaborative Surveys Surveys directly on envelopes carrying IMPACT packet, filled out by sender as well as receiver. Online survey at completion of pilot 21

Senders found the data 22

Receivers got most of their needs 23

Home Care needed even more! 24

S&I s Longitudinal Coordination of Care WG Longitudinal Coordination of Care Workgroup Providing subject matter expertise and coordination of SWGs Developing systems view to identify interoperability gaps and prioritize activities LTPAC Care Transition Sub- Workgroup Identifying the key business and technical challenges that inhibit long-term care data exchanges Defining data elements for LTPAC information exchange using a single standard for LTPAC transfer summaries Patient Assessment Summary Sub- Workgroup Establishing the standards for the exchange of Patient Assessment Summary (PAS) documents Providing consultation to transformation tool being developed by Geisinger to transform the noninteroperable MDSv3 and OASIS-C into an interoperable clinical document (CCD+) Longitudinal Care Plan Sub- Workgroup Near-Term: Developing an implementation guide to standardize the exchange of the Home Health Plan of Care (former CMS 485 form) Long-Term: Identify and develop key functional requirements and data sets that would support a longitudinal care plan 25

Timeline for Standards Development October 2012 MA HIway go-live in 10 large sites with CCD and LAND March 2013 Preliminary Implementation Guide completed April 2013 Pilot electronic Transfer of Care Datasets between 16 central Massachusetts organizations using MA HIway, LAND & SEE May 2013 Finish Implementation Guide using the S&I Framework incorporating pilot feedback September 2013 HL7 Balloted/Reconciled/Published Implementation Guide in Consolidated CDA 26

Getting Connected: LAND & SEE 27

LAND & SEE Sites with EHR or electronic assessment tool use these applications to enter data elements LAND ( Local Adaptor for Network Distribution) acts as a data courier to gather, transform, and securely transfer data if no support for Direct SMTP/SMIME or IHE XDR Non-EHR users complete all of the data fields and routing using a web browser to access their Surrogate EHR Environment (SEE) 28

Surrogate EHR Environment (SEE) Acts as destination for routed CCD+ documents Software hosted by trusted authority, accessed via web browser SEE is accessed via the HIE s web mailbox Non-EHR users able to use SEE to view, edit, send CDA documents via HIE or Direct to next facility Can select document type (e.g. Transfer of Care or INTERACT SBAR) to display section flags indicating their optionality Can reconcile 2 documents to create a third SEE users able to locally print copies of the documents or subsets of the documents 29

Using SEE for LTPAC Workflows SNF patient getting sicker Subset of Transfer of Care dataset that is in SBAR (INTERACT) is flagged for completion by nurse online Can re-use data received from hospital Can re-use clinical assessment data (function, cognition, wound) from last MDS Completed SBAR printed for chart Patient transfer to Emergency Department Can re-use hospital, MDS, OASIS or SBAR data Multiple users (nurse, social worker, clerk, etc ) can work on different sections online at same time Completed ToC dataset sent electronically to ED Subset can be printed for ambulance team 30

LTPAC Communication Today Paper! Home Health Non-standard EHR OASIS PCP Hospital Billing Program MDS 31 Nursing Facility

LTPAC Communication with LAND & SEE LAND & SEE fill in gaps Home Health SEE CCD+ Non-standard EHR OASIS OASIS LAND CCD+ PCP Hospital CCD+ SEE CCD+ MDS LAND Billing Program MDS 32 Nursing Facility

The Future with LTPAC EHR Standards Home Health EHR OASIS CCD+ CCD+ PCP Hospital CCD+ EHR MDS CCD+ 33 Nursing Facility

Advantages of LAND & SEE Most role-based authentication uses EHR, using work that local organizations have already done Most users (docs & nurses) only work out of 1 system Data re-used whenever possible No blended central clinical data repository Case/discharge managers or nurses can control when and where to route documents because they re the ones that know when and where! Non-EHR users get same HIE transport functionality as EHR users Relatively low-cost to deploy and support Easily 34 scalable and replicable

Standard Configurations of LAND Necessary to support some advanced characteristics of IMPACT: MDS XML documents from Nursing Facilities OASIS XML documents from Home Health agencies Expanded data set beyond what is in a standard CCD 35

Outbound LAND configurations Merge a standard CCD and a second XML document that contains additional data elements into a Transfer of Care CDA document Transform data element transmitted via an HL7 2.x Results interface from an EHR into a Transfer of Care CDA document Transform an MDS XML file into a CCD Transform an OASIS XML file into a CCD 36

Inbound LAND configurations Transform a Transfer of Care CDA document into a free-text document Transform a Transfer of Care CDA document into a free-text document and transmit it to an EHR via an HL7 2.x Transcription interface Transform a Transfer of Care CDA document into discrete data elements and transmit them to an EHR via an HL7 2.x Results interface Transform a Transfer of Care CDA document into a standard CCD and a second XML document that contains additional data elements 37

Sharing LAND & SEE LAND Orion Health s Rhapsody Integration Engine http://www.orionhealth.com/solutions/packages/rhapsody We ll make some standard configurations available SEE Written in JAVA Baseline functionality software and source code that can connect to Orion s HISP mailbox via API available for free starting ~July 2013 (Apache Version 2.0 vs. MIT open source license) Innovators can develop and charge for enhancements, for example: Integration with other vendors HISP mailboxes Automated CDA document reconciliation 38

IMPACT Timeline for Next Steps Dates Activity 9/2012 3/2013 Integrate pilot sites into state HIE using LAND & SEE 4/2013 5/2013 Pilot site Go-lives with state HIE using LAND & SEE 2/2013 9/2013 Ballot updated datasets in S&I Framework and HL7 6/2013 7/2013 Make SEE available under Open Source License 4/2013 9/2013 Evaluate hospital (re)admissions & total cost of care 39

Questions? TOMalley@Partners.org Lawrence.Garber@ReliantMedicalGroup.org