Point Mugu Sea Range Scheduling

Similar documents
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. 1. PURPOSE. In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) (Reference (a)), this Instruction:

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

NAVAIR Commander s Awards recognize teams for excellence

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Industry Day RDML Mat Winter Commander, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division. 23 May 2012

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Subj: UNIFORM MATERIEL MOVEMENT AND ISSUE PRIORITY SYSTEM

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Management and Mobilization of Regular and Reserve Retired Military Members

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Subj: THREAT SUPPORT TO THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM

The Fifth Element and the Operating Forces are vitally linked providing the foundation that supports the MAGTF, from training through Operational

Subj: NAVY ENTERPRISE TEST AND EVALUATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support

US Military Space Organizations

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Single Manager Responsibility for Military Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology and Training (EODT&T)

Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is con

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC

APPENDIX II: EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION 2 - COMMUNICATIONS

OPNAVINST E DNS-H 18 June 2012

DEPARTMENTOFTHENAVY COMMANDER, REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTERS 9170 SECOND STREET, SUITE 245 NORFOLK, VA

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: WEATHER SERVICE. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 19 Dec Subj: NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY POLICY, RELATIONSHIPS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

2017 Defense Acquisition Workforce Individual Achievement Award

INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM. Position Manual RAPID INTERVENTION GROUP SUPERVISOR HIGH RISE INCIDENT ICS-1006

Department of Defense

Navy Medicine. Commander s Guidance

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Defense Tech, Cyber & Intel CAREER FAIRS

OPNAVINST F N4 5 Jun 2012

ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM POLICY AND MANAGEMENT

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Program (SPACE) - EMD

Unmanned Systems. Northrop Grumman Today Annual Conference

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #62

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Task Force Innovation Working Groups

Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #188

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Program MDAP/MAIS Code: 121

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page

F oreword. Working together, we will attain the greatest degree of spectrum access possible for the current and future Navy/Marine Corps team.

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Program MDAP/MAIS Code: 121

Standard Missile: Snapshots in Time Captured by Previous Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest Articles

UNCLASSIFIED. COST ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

STATEMENT J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

NAVY CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PROGRAM AND POLICY

MCWP Electronic Warfare. U.S. Marine Corps PCN

resource allocation decisions.

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 31 Oct Subj: NAVY ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY AND STANDARDS

Logbook Navy Perspective on Joint Force Interdependence Navigating Rough Seas Forging a Global Network of Navies

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: DoD Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) Program

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

DOD INSTRUCTION DEPOT SOURCE OF REPAIR (DSOR) DETERMINATION PROCESS

3 rd Annual Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Summit

Reserve units change leadership at China Lake

CJCSI B Requirements Generation System (One Year Later)

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Physical Security Equipment

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #89

Agenda. Background Navy Posture Survey Recommendations

Logbook Adm. Greenert and Gen. Amos: A New Naval Era Adm. Greenert and Gen. Welsh: Breaking the Kill Chain

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

MCWP Aviation Logistics. U.S. Marine Corps PCN

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Contract Management Agency INSTRUCTION. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Support

OPNAVINST C N43 18 Jun Subj: NAVY EXPEDITIONARY TABLE OF ALLOWANCE AND ADVANCED BASE FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT POLICY

Subj: SURFACE SHIP AND SUBMARINE SURVIVABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

Emergency Support Function (ESF) 6 Mass Care

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Department of Defense. ßßtCöö-ö^ 503? OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL DOD'S EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC COMBAT

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

NSWCCD-SSES SSES COMMAND OVERVIEW. 12 June Patricia C. Woody Department Head Machinery Research and Engineering

Conducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment

THE ROLE OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON DEFENCE AND MILITARY VETERANS SANDF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN FY12/13

Advance Questions for Buddie J. Penn Nominee for Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Installations and Environment

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified

WikiLeaks Document Release

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: DoD Civilian Work Force Contingency and Emergency Planning and Execution

Middle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways

OPNAVINST D N Mar 2010

Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)

a. To promulgate policy on cost analysis throughout the Department of the Navy (DON).

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD P. FORMICA, USA

UNCLASSIFIED TABLE OF CONTENTS

Subj: REQUIRED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY AND PROJECTED OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT STATEMENTS FOR FLEET AIR RECONNAISSANCE SQUADRON SEVEN (VQ-7)

BUPERSINST C PERS-434B 24 Apr 2018 BUPERS INSTRUCTION C. From: Chief of Naval Personnel. Subj: TEST PILOT SCHOOLS. 1.

DOD INSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF DOD RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D) LABORATORIES

Transcription:

Point Mugu Sea Range Scheduling Presented by Mr. John Gurka Range Department Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division Point Mugu, CA 1

Sea Range Scheduling Goal The goal of Point Mugu Sea Range scheduling is to meet all customer requirements and utilize the Sea Range to the fullest extent possible. We do not use a strict priority system. We avoid declaring winners and losers. Programs are scheduled according to event execution requirements with consideration for program and range constraints. Dates and times of events may be adjusted to maximize utilization of the Sea Range and ensure the highest percentage of customer requests are satisfied. Start with programs constrained to certain dates and times and fill remaining range time with programs that can flex. 2

Sea Range Schedule Progression Long Range Forecast Two-week Schedule Daily Schedule Snapshot of future months (1-6 months or more). Developed after initial contacts with customers. Does not contain all event details or approvals. Multiple requests for same range time are de-conflicted early. Changes to forecast worked jointly with customer. Narrow timeframe (current and next two weeks). Result of significant time invested in planning, approvals, documentation. Multiple requests for same range time have been de-conflicted. Allows range resource providers to assess specific support requirements. Execution plan for that day. Culmination of significant time invested in planning, approvals, documentation. Last minute changes (cancellations, etc.) may allow standby tests to be conducted. 3

Schedule De-confliction Guidelines We do everything possible to schedule and support every test as requested. However, conflicting requests for Sea Range time and resources must be addressed. Can a conflicting event be conducted on a different date or at a different time? The more flexible the program, the better the Sea Range can satisfy all customer needs. In cases where a schedule conflict cannot be resolved through mutual agreement, the following considerations are taken. DoD and Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) priorities, Joint Urgent Operational Needs and Rapid Deployments, Brick-Bat and Cue-Cap priorities. Acquisition milestones and deploying forces requirements. Program constraints. Special assets availability (ships, off-station instrumentation assets, etc.). Satellite launch windows. Time-of-day requirements. Support team availability. 4

Weekly Adjustments NAWCWD Spectrum Management Office reviews the Integrated Frequency Deconfliction System (IFDS) IFDS includes radio frequency schedules from Western Ranges. Highlights potential radio frequency conflicts between users. Potential radio frequency conflicts are worked by NAWCWD Spectrum Management Office. Conflicts within NAWCWD ranges worked with Range Test Managers. Conflicts with other Western Ranges or other Government and commercial activities are worked with cognizant personnel, including personnel at Edwards AFB, Vandenberg AFB, NASA, or Fleet squadrons. 5

Policy for Operations Complexity Sea Range workload must not exceed instrumentation setup limitations or the ability of our work force to safely and effectively support. An operations complexity model is used to manage the scheduling of Sea Range events. The Policy for Operations Complexity sets complexity limitations to the Sea Range schedule. The Test Manager sets a complexity metric for a customer event based upon the complexity Policy. The complexity metric is used by Range Scheduling to Set time between operations. Limit concurrent operations. Establish an acceptable level of complexity per Day/Week/Hour. Customer events are scheduled to keep the overall Sea Range schedule within the limits set by the Policy. Time between events vary based upon event complexity. 6

Rescheduling Events Scheduling backup events is highly recommended. Backup events are included in the long-range forecast then carried to the two-week schedule. Backup events typically immediately follow primary events. Example: Tuesday primary, Wednesday backup. Multiple sets of primary and backup events may be added to the long-range forecast as a contingency. Example: First week of July forecasted one primary plus one backup event. First week of August forecasted a second primary and a second backup. Cancelled and scrubbed events will be rescheduled as soon as practical. The Sea Range Test Manager is your advocate for scheduling events. 7

Questions? Additional information available at Naval Air System Command Ranges http://www.navair.navy.mil/tande/ranges/ 8