Smoky Mountain Center Report to the North Carolina General Assembly Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services

Similar documents
Smoky Mountain Center LME/MCO Intellectual/ Developmental Disabilities State Benefit Plan and Level of Care Guidelines

DRAFT. Helpful Contacts. Provider Help Line General Questions/ Technical Assistance Requests to add a site or service

Status of Implementing Legislation Regarding the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians

North Carolina Department of Public Safety

Residential Level Transitions: Levels III and IV

Vaya Health State Level of Care Guidelines Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities

Vaya Health. 200 Ridgefield Court, Suite 206 Asheville, NC Hour Access to Care:

Cardinal Innovations Healthcare 2017 Needs and Gaps Analysis

The TBI Waiver: the North Carolina Brain Injury Advisory Council Recommendations to the Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services

The Basics of LME/MCO Authorization and Appeals

FY 2017 Quality Management Program Evaluation

NC START. Lisa Wolfe NC START East Director. August Reinventing Quality Conference Baltimore MD

(c) A small client to staff caseload, typically 10:1, to consistently provide necessary staffing diversity and coverage;

Medicaid and the. Bus Pass Problem

The North Carolina Appalachian Regional Commission Program North Carolina Department of Commerce

Alternative or in Lieu of Service Description Alliance Behavioral Healthcare

IV. Clinical Policies and Procedures

Intensive In-Home Services (IIHS): Aligning Care Efficiencies with Effective Treatment. BHM Healthcare Solutions

Impact on State Facilities and Community Psychiatric Hospitals

North Carolina s Transformation to Managed Care

Family Centered Treatment Service Definition

Intensive In-Home Services Training

Medicaid Transformation

Managed Care Organizations (MCOs): The Basics and Emerging Issues. Who is Disability Rights NC?

Medicaid Funded Services Plan

Drug Medi-Cal Organized Delivery System (DMC-ODS) Waiver

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE BULLETIN

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE BULLETIN COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA * DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE

STUDY MEDICAID WAIVER FOR CHILDREN WITH SERIOUS EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE

2016 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CCBHCs 101: Opportunities and Strategic Decisions Ahead

What are MCOs? (b)/(c) refers to the type of waiver approved by CMS to allow this type of managed care program. The

Provider Network Capacity, Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis

AOPMHC STRATEGIC PLANNING 2016

COMPETITIVE BIDDING OF MANAGED CARE FOR MEDICAID BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

Specialized Therapeutic Foster Care and Therapeutic Group Home (Florida)

The Behavioral Health System. Presentation to the House Select Committee on Mental Health

NETWORK180 PROVIDER MANUAL SECTION 1: SERVICE REQUIREMENTS HOME-BASED SERVICES

Annunciation Maternity Home

N.C. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES NORTH CAROLINA FOREST SERVICE YOUNG OFFENDERS FOREST CONSERVATION PROGRAM B.R.I.D.G.E.

(b)(3) Transitional Living Adolescents MH/SA Adults MH/SA Medicaid Billable Service Effective Revised

NC TASC. Bridging Systems for Effective Care Management of Persons with SA/MH Problems Involved in the Criminal Justice System. North Carolina TASC

Cardinal Innovations Child Continuum of Care Philosophy. March 2014

JMOC Update. Barbara R. Sears, Director September 20, 2018

Quality Management Plan Fiscal Year

Wyoming CME Clinical Eligibility Criteria

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Medicaid Appeals Involving Managed Care Organizations

2009 Grant Application

Critical Time Intervention (CTI) (State-Funded)

MEDICAID MANAGED LONG-TERM SERVICES AND SUPPORTS OPPORTUNITIES FOR INNOVATIVE PROGRAM DESIGN

2017 Community Mental Health, Substance Use and Developmental Disabilities Services Needs and Gaps Analysis

PSYCHIATRY SERVICES UPDATE

CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH ACT

Behavioral Health Services. San Francisco Department of Public Health

Individual and Family Guide

World View Community College Symposium November 14, 2007

Medicaid Prescribed Drug Program. Spending Control Initiatives

Quality Management & Program Development (QMPD)

Understanding the Referral Criteria and Process to MH/SUD Care Coordination

Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities & Substance Abuse Services NC Mental Health and Substance Use Service Array Survey

Transforming Healthcare Delivery, the Challenges for Behavioral Health

Community Care of North Carolina

Integrated Children s Services Initiative Frequently Asked Questions July 20, 2005

CHILDREN S MENTAL HEALTH BENCHMARKING PROJECT SECOND YEAR REPORT

EVALUATION OF THE CARE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECT. Prepared By: Geneva Strech, M. Ed., MHR Betty Harris, M. A. John Vetter, M. A.

Quality Management Report 2017 Q2

AOPMHC STRATEGIC PLANNING 2018

January 9, Serving Durham, Wake, Cumberland and Johnston Counties

Service Review Criteria

EVALUATION OF THE CARE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECT. June 30, 2011 Prepared By: Geneva Strech, M. Ed., MHR Betty Harris, M. A. John Vetter, M. A.

The UK s European university. Inpatient Services for People with Intellectual Disabilities and/or Autism

North Carolina Division of Medical Assistance

Annual Quality Management Program Evaluation. Fiscal Year

I. General Instructions

Behavioral health provider overview

Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court Intervention Center Behavioral Health Services RFP

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

Quarterly Report on Agency Services to Floridians with Developmental Disabilities and Their Costs

Department of Vermont Health Access Department of Mental Health. dvha.vermont.gov/ vtmedicaid.com/#/home

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Applicability: { } All DJJ Staff { } Administration { } Community Services {x} Secure Facilities I.

County of San Bernardino Department of Behavioral Health Children and Youth Programs Continuum of Care

Performance-Based Contracting

CODES: H0045-U4 = Individual Respite H0045-HQ-U4 = Group Respite T1005-TD-U4 = Nursing Respite-RN T1005-TE-U4 = Nursing Respite-LPN

Mayor s Innovation Conference Health Care. August 21, 2014

The Oregon Administrative Rules contain OARs filed through December 14, 2012

Performance Standards

Provider Evaluation of Performance. Plan. Tennessee

North Carolina Military Business Center

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS:

TARRANT COUNTY DIVERSION INITIATIVES

CRISIS AND INPATIENT SERVICES

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 14B 1

Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facility (PRTF) Prior Authorization Request

NETWORK180 PROVIDER MANUAL SECTION 1: SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TARGETED CASE MANAGEMENT

In-Home Services Programs

ATTACHMENT II EXHIBIT II-C Effective Date: February 1, 2018 SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS SPECIALTY PLAN

NASSAU COUNTY SINGLE POINT OF ACCESS (SPOA) CHILDREN S INTENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMS

MHP Work Plan: 1 Behavioral Health Integrated Access

What behavioral health services can I get?

Transcription:

Smoky Mountain Center Report to the North Carolina General Assembly Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services Presented by Brian Ingraham, CEO February 27, 2013 Access to Services: 1-800-849-6127 www.smokymountaincenter.com

Information & Education Operations under the Waiver represent a different set of business practices, expectations and requirements These changes, which are showing better outcomes and cost control are challenging to adapt to Providing information and education to consumer members, providers and stakeholders on these changes, and explaining what Smoky is doing is an important part of our mission.

Monthly Operations at a Glance Report

Total # of Individuals Individuals Eligible for Medicaid 77,000 76,500 76,000 75,500 75,000 74,500 74,000 73,500 July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Individuals on the NC INNOVATIONS Waiver 649 640 648 646 643 643 638 Others Who Receive Medicaid 74,751 74,751 75,777 75,800 75,472 76,105 75,697

Total Calls Calls Answered by SMC Customer Services 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 - July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Calls Answered by SMC CSRs 4,778 3,406 2,622 2,790 2,554 2,036 2,826

Seconds Average Time to Answer Calls (in seconds) 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Time 17.0 14.0 14.0 11.0 13.0 11.0 11.0

# of Requests Approved Authorization Requests 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan I/DD Service Requests 1,315 672 409 503 265 429 411 MH/SA Service Requests 2,026 2,224 1,713 1,963 2,001 1,580 2,008

Seconds Average Time for Review of Authorizations for Care Management 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 - July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Time 3.8 3.4 3.4 5.6 5.5 5 7.4

Total Denials Requests Not Authorized (Administrative and Non-Administrative Denials) 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 - July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Clinical Denials 1 5 15 29 31 133 334 Administrative Denials 496 552 475 502 538 432 517

Total # of Reconsiderations Requests for Reconsideration/Appeals 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 - July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Reconsideration Requests - 1 1 13 7 14 44 Reconsiderations Decisions Appealed - - 1 0 2 0 1

Total # of Individuals Care Coordination 1,650 1,450 1,250 1,050 850 650 450 250 MH/SA "High Risk" individuals/families Served by Care Coordinators N Individuals/Families Served by Innovations Care Coordinators July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 616 616 548 576 563 553 891 649 648 643 641 658 656 660 * Total numbers differ prior to January 2013 due to differences in reporting practices. Reporting prior to January 2013 occurred at the beginning of the month. Effective January 2013 totals were calculated based on caseload at any point during the month.

Total Grievances Grievances Filed 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 - July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Grievances Filed About Providers 12 8 9 13 9 5 9 Grievances Filed About SMC 4 4 0 2 4 4 4

Days Average Time to Resolve a Grievance 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 - July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Time 12.85 11.58 11 10 5 10 8

Total Volume Claims Volume 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Claims Processed 18,708 59,317 75,217 105,767 81,937 72,676 85,965 Claims Approved and Paid 14,799 47,042 63,533 86,401 64,338 59,259 72,462

Days Average Time to Process a Clean Claim 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 - July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Time 2.3 2.7 2.7 2.6 0.5 0.1 0.2

Dollar Amount Total Medicaid Dollars Paid to Providers $12,000,000.00 $10,000,000.00 $8,000,000.00 $6,000,000.00 $4,000,000.00 $2,000,000.00 $0.00 July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Amount $647,571.65 $3,657,770.36 $7,510,722.00 $10,817,967.00 $5,656,956.00 $6,843,677.00 $6,724,695.00

Total Number Number of Providers Paid 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 - July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Number of Providers Receiving Claims Payments 63 126 167 203 199 209 232 Number of Provider in Network 228 236 244 254 266 271 286 Percentage 27.6% 53.4% 68.4% 80.0% 74.8% 81.1% 81.1% * SMC contracts with six (6) single case agreement Providers.

SMC Efforts to Improve Outcomes for Youth: Managing and Coordinating Care for Children in Residential Settings

In the Beginning On July 1, 2012, SMC received the ValueOptions Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facility (PRTF) transition list, which identified specific children from the SMC catchment area residing in PRTFs. SMC Care Coordinators started immediate outreach to the eightyone (81) children included on that list. SMC Care Coordination implemented standards that required all children in PRTF placements to receive face-to-face visits at least quarterly, and that SMC Care Coordinators would participate in all Child and Family Team meetings, regardless of location.

Level of Care and Lengths of Stay Based on clinical documentation submitted by PRTF providers and information gathered at Child and Family Team meetings concerns emerged regarding the level of care and lengths of stay. This triggered an assertive record review for all consumers in PRTF placement, including: Diagnosis; Length of stay; Prior treatment history; Current interventions; Current behavioral symptomatology; Outcomes; and Clinical documentation to support level of care.

Consistent Standards & Expectations SMC launched an interdepartmental work group to ensure consistency in expectations regarding authorizations, clinical policy, and medical necessity interpretation. Care Managers developed and implemented the following: Adherence to NC Division of Medical Assistance Clinical Coverage Policy 8D-1 for PRTFs; Development and implementation of Medical Necessity check sheets across all enhanced services, including PRTF; and Staffing of all residential cases with the SMC Chief Medical Officer.

Best Practice A cross-departmental clinical team reviewed national best practice to determine the most appropriate utilization of PRTF. Typically, PRTF is appropriate for short-term crisis intervention. Certain diagnoses may or may not benefit from the PRTF level of care (i.e. Conduct and Oppositional Defiant Disorders typically do not benefit).

Educating Providers and Stakeholders The team met with PRTF providers and stakeholders (Departments of Social Services, Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention) to provide information regarding best practice treatment models. SMC also related its plans to move forward in evaluating individual cases where children were placed in PRTFs, step down plans to community-based services where indicated, and how SMC will address service gaps in more rural counties for step down services. SMC staff supported PRTF providers by educating them about new SMC clinical practices and documentation needs for authorization of PRTF and other services in the child services continuum.

Improved Quality of Care SMC s efforts improved the quality of care for the identified children by matching their service level to their service need and integrating each child's treatment within their home community. Currently, only 22 children are in PRTF, compared to 81 at the outset. This community based treatment approach improves the likelihood for better long-term outcomes, and achieves significant reductions in PRTF expenditures (from approximately $776,000 per month to $264,000 per month). These savings have opened the door to support creative community based programming to divert high risk children from residential levels of care and to step them down to the community when out of home placement is appropriate.

Case Study #1 S is a 15 year-old male with diagnoses of Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Sexual Abuse (perpetrator), and Depressive Disorder. He was in PRTF placement beginning in November of 2010 (slightly over 2 years), and likely would have remained there without Care Management intervention. This young man had no incidence of sexually inappropriate behavior for an extended period, and had developed a relapse prevention program. Care Coordination was actively involved with him at the facility. The SMC Care Manager staffed this case with the Chief Medical Officer who recommended discharge within 30 days of review. S stepped down to a lower level of care and has not required services that are more intensive.

Case Study #2 J is now eighteen and diagnosed with Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Polysubstance Dependence Disorder. She was in placement since March of 2012, and was involved with Juvenile Justice. The Care Coordinator reviewed her case and found that the consumer was stable in placement, and recommended step down to support and prepare J for aging out of the child system and back into the community. The Care Coordinator maintained connection with the Department of Juvenile Justice and the provider who would provide community services for J upon her return home. This team continued staffing J's case while the Care Coordinator worked simultaneously with the facility to prepare a discharge plan. J has successfully stepped down to her father's home, receives Intensive In-Home Services, and is linked with an Independent Living Skills program.

Case Study #3 R is a 15 year-old female in DSS custody, placed in a PRTF and diagnosed with Conduct Disorder, Sexual Abuse, and Depressive Disorder. Care Management became aware of her case through Utilization Management s documentation review process. In the meantime, Care Coordination also began to question whether R could step down with the assistance of Child and Family Team involvement. The Care Coordinator facilitated discharge planning, as there were difficulties getting responses from R s DSS Social Worker and the PRTF staff. Care Management did not support further authorization of PRTF due to the lack of medical necessity and based on information showing R could receive more effective treatment in a therapeutic foster care setting. Care Coordination worked with the residential facility to prepare an appropriate discharge plan and supported R in making a successful transition.

Questions? Brian Ingraham, CEO 1207 East Street Waynesville, NC 28786 (828) 586-5501, ext. 1201 brian@smokymountaincenter.com Smoky Mountain Center manages mental health, substance abuse, and intellectual/developmental disability services in the North Carolina Counties of Alexander, Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Jackson, Macon, McDowell, Swain, Watauga and Wilkes. Toll-free Access to Services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: 1-800-849-6127 (TTY calls: 1-800-855-2280) www.smokymountaincenter.com