Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Similar documents
Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure

Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 12 of 16 Date issued: May 2013

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category

Measure: Patient name. Referring or transitioning healthcare provider's name and office contact information (MIPS eligible clinician only) Procedures

Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program -- Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options

Decoding the QPP Year 2 Quality Measure Benchmarks and Deciles to Maximize Performance

Michelle Brunsen & Sandy Swallow May 25, , Telligen, Inc.

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: November 2013

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide

Quality Payment Program Year 2: 2018 MIPS Participation. An Introductory Guide for CRNAs in 2018

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

March 28, Dear Dr. Yong:

Syndromic Surveillance 2015 Edition CEHRT Promoting Interoperability

Advancing Care Information Performance Category Fact Sheet

MACRA Frequently Asked Questions

EHR/Meaningful Use

Table 1: MIPS Exemptions. Exemption Individual Determination Group Determination Treatment under MIPS Already Finalized EXEMPTIONS Low-Volume

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

2017/2018. KPN Health, Inc. Quality Payment Program Solutions Guide. KPN Health, Inc. A CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) KPN Health, Inc.

MACRA and MIPS. How Medicare Meaningful Use and PQRS are Changing

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

Advancing Care Information- The New Meaningful Use September 2017

MACRA and the Quality Payment Program. Frequently Asked Questions Edition

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Oklahoma s Public Health Immunization Reporting Updates. By Brittany Curry of OSDH. An Important Reminder. For audio, you must use your phone:

The MIPS Survival Guide

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

MIPS Scoring: Explanation and Estimation 2/7/2017 and 2/10/2017

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Quality Payment Program MIPS. Advanced APMs. Quality Payment Program

2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements

MIPS eligibility lookup tool (available in Spring 2018):

MACRA Quality Payment Program

The Healthcare Roundtable

Kate Goodrich, MD MHS. Director, Center for Clinical Standards & Quality. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) May 6, 2016

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

Medicare Physician Payment Reform

June 27, CMS 5517 P Merit-Based Incentive System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

The Quality Payment Program Overview Fact Sheet

How CME is Changing: The Influence of Population Health, MACRA, and MIPS

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System: 2018 Performance Year

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

MACRA Quality Payment Program

Steps toward Sustainability with the second year of the Quality Payment Program

SVS QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES COMMITTEE (QPMC) New Member Orientation

The Quality Payment Program: Overview & Roles and Responsibilities

MIPS Deep Dive: 9 steps to Reporting. Sharon Phelps QPP Webinar Series Webinar 4 June 20, 2017

MACRA Open Call December 5 th, 2016

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Advancing Care Information Measures Data Validation Criteria. Reporting Requirement: Yes/No or Numerator/Denominator

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

ONC Policy Overview. Session 66, February 21, Elise Sweeney Anthony, Director of Policy, ONC

Quality Payment Program Final Rule Year 2: What s Coming in the New Year!

Quality Innovation Network-Quality Improvement Organization (QIN-QIO) April Update

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Agenda. Surviving the New Program Requirements and the Financial Penalties Under MIPS 9/9/2016. Steps to take to prepare for MIPS

MIPS Advancing Care Information: Tips, Tools and Support Q&A from Live Webinar March 29, 2017

IMPLICATIONS OF THE 2018 FINAL RULE FOR SOLO PRACTITIONERS AND SMALL GROUP PRACTICES

Under the MACRAscope:

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Medicare Quality Payment Program: Deep Dive FAQs for 2017 Performance Year Hospital-Employed Physicians

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

WHITE PAPER. Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know about the MACRA Advancing Care Information Component

MACRA FLEXIBILITY & THE MACRA FINAL RULE. Compliance & Opportunity for Your Practice

CMS Transforming Clinical Practices Initiative and. The Southern New England Practice Transformation Network (SNE PTN)

Overview of Quality Payment Program

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program

Meaningful Use 101. AIRA October 26, 2015

Connecticut Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Frequently Asked Questions

Transcription:

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period Objective: Measure: Measure ID: Public Health and Clinical Data Registry Reporting Public Health Registry Reporting The MIPS eligible clinician is in active engagement with a agency (PHA) to submit data to registries. ACI_PHCDRR_4 Definition of Terms Active engagement The MIPS eligible clinician is in the process of moving towards sending "production data" to a agency or clinical data registry, or is sending production data to a agency or clinical data registry. There are several options to achieve active engagement as follows Active Engagement Option 1 Completed Registration to Submit Data: The MIPS eligible clinician registered to submit data with the PHA to which the information is being submitted; registration was completed within 60 days after the start of the performance period; and the MIPS eligible clinician is awaiting an invitation from the PHA to begin testing and validation. This option allows MIPS eligible clinicians to meet the measure when the PHA has limited resources to initiate the testing and validation process. MIPS eligible clinicians that have registered in previous years do not need to submit an additional registration to meet this requirement for each performance period. Active Engagement Option 2 Testing and Validation: The MIPS eligible clinician is in the process of testing and validation of the electronic submission of data. MIPS eligible clinicians must respond to requests from the PHA within 30 days; failure to respond twice within a performance period would result in that MIPS eligible clinician not meeting the measure. 1

Active Engagement Option 3 Production: The MIPS eligible clinician has completed testing and validation of the electronic submission and is electronically submitting production data to the PHA. Production data Refers to data generated through clinical processes involving patient care, and it is used to distinguish between data and test data which may be submitted for the purposes of enrolling in and testing electronic data transfers. Reporting Requirements YES/NO The MIPS eligible clinician must attest YES to being in active engagement with a PHA to submit data to registries. Scoring Information BASE SCORE/PERFORMANCE SCORE/BONUS SCORE Required for Base Score: No Percentage of Performance Score: 10% for to a single registry Eligible for Bonus Score: Yes, 5% as long as credit not received under the performance score for this measure. One-time bonus of 10% for MIPS eligible clinicians and groups who report using 2015 Edition CEHRT exclusively for the 2018 performance period and submit only Advancing Care Information measures. Note: MIPS eligible clinicians must fulfill the requirements of base score measures to earn a base score in order to earn any score in the Advancing Care Information performance category. In addition to the base score, MIPS eligible clinicians have the opportunity to earn additional credit through the submission of performance measures and a bonus measure and/or activity. Additional Information More information about Advancing Care Information scoring is available on the QPP website. MIPS eligible clinicians can report the Advancing Care Information objectives and measures if they have technology certified to the 2015 Edition, or a combination of technologies from the 2014 and 2015 Editions that support these measures. In 2018, a one-time bonus will be earned MIPS eligible clinicians and groups who report using 2015 Edition CEHRT exclusively for their 2018 performance period. 2

MIPS eligible clinicians will receive 10 percentage points in the performance score for to a single registry under the Public Health and Clinical Data Registry Reporting objective, however, the performance score will be limited to 10 percentage points no matter how many registries they report to. Active engagement with a or clinical data registry or registries that is/are different from the agency or registry that a MIPS eligible clinician identified to earn a performance score will earn the MIPS eligible clinician a bonus of 5 percentage points. However, a MIPS eligible clinician cannot receive credit under both the performance score and bonus score for to the same agency or registry. A MIPS eligible clinician may count a specialized registry under this measure if the MIPS eligible clinician achieved the phase of active engagement as described under active engagement option 3: production meaning the clinician has completed testing and validation of the electronic submission and is electronically submitting production data to the agency. MIPS eligible clinicians who have previously registered, tested, or begun ongoing submission of data to registry do not need to restart the process. CMS has developed a centralized repository for PHA and clinical data registry (CDR). The collected data is posted on the EHR Incentive Programs website. When MIPS eligible clinicians choose to report as a group, data should be aggregated for all MIPS eligible clinicians under one Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). This includes those MIPS eligible clinicians who may qualify for reweighting such as a significant hardship exception, hospital or ASC-based status, or in a specialty which is not required to report data to the Advancing Care Information performance category. If these MIPS eligible clinicians choose to report as a part of a group practice, they will be scored on the Advancing Care Information performance category like all other MIPS eligible clinicians. Regulatory References For further discussion, please see the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) final rule: 81 FR 77229. In order to meet this objective and measure, a MIPS eligible clinician must use the capabilities and standards of CEHRT at 45 CFR 170.315 (f)(6) and (f)(7). Certification and Standards Criteria Below is the corresponding certification and standards criteria for electronic health record technology that supports achieving the meaningful use of this measure. 3

Certification Criteria* 170.315(f)(6) Transmission to agencies antimicrobial use and resistance Create antimicrobial use and resistance information for electronic transmission in accordance with the standard specified in 170.205(r)(1). 170.315(f)(7) Transmission to agencies health care surveys Create health care survey information for electronic transmission in accordance with the standard specified in 170.205(s)(1). *Depending on the type of certification issued to the EHR technology, it will also have been certified to the certification criterion adopted at 45 CFR 170.314 (g)(1), (g)(2), or both, in order to assist in the calculation of this meaningful use measure. Standards Criteria 170.205(d)(2) 170.205(d)(3) HL7 2.5.1 Standard. HL7 2.5.1 Implementation specifications. PHIN Messaging Guide for Syndromic Surveillance (incorporated by reference in 170.299) and Conformance Clarification for EHR Certification of Syndromic Surveillance, Addendum to PHIN Messaging Guide for Syndromic Surveillance 4

170.205(d)(4) Standard. HL7 2.5.1 Implementation specifications. PHIN Messaging Guide for Syndromic Surveillance: Emergency Department, Urgent Care, Inpatient and Ambulatory Care Settings, Release 2.0, April 21, 2015 (incorporated by reference in 170.299) and Erratum to the CDC PHIN 2.0 Implementation Guide, August 2015; Erratum to the CDC PHIN 2.0 Messaging Guide, April 2015 Release for Syndromic Surveillance: Emergency Department, Urgent Care, Inpatient and Ambulatory Care Settings 170.207(a)(3)(4) HTSDO SNOMED CT International Release July 2012 (incorporated by reference in 170.299) and US Extension to SNOMED CT March 2012 Release IHTSDO SNOMED CT, U.S. Edition, September 2015 Release 170.207(c)(2)(3) Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC ) Database version 2.40, a universal code system for identifying laboratory and clinical observations produced by the Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC ) Database version 2.52, a universal code system for identifying laboratory and clinical observations produced by the Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Additional certification and standards criteria may apply. Review the ONC 2015 Edition Final Rule for more information. 5