Improving primary care practices in the United States is a widely. Cost Estimates for Operating a Primary Care Practice Facilitation Program

Similar documents
Strategies to Support the Integration of Behavioral Health and Primary Care: What Have We Learned Thus Far?

To meet the challenges of a reformed health care system, primary

Experience from the Front Line*: Patient-Centered Medical Home

Healthy Hearts Northwest : A 2 x 2 Randomized Factorial Trial to Build Quality Improvement Capacity in Primary Care

Learning Lab Objectives. Introduce evidence showing team-based primary care leads to better patient health outcomes.

The medical home model of primary care delivery has

Treating sinusitis? Managing obesity? Preventing heart disease? Preventing lung cancer? Managing individuals with multiple chronic diseases?

Correlation of the Care by Design Primary Care Practice Redesign Model and the Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home

Building & Strengthening Patient Centered Medical Homes in the Safety Net

Culture Change. Bryan J. Weiner, Ph.D.

Does The Chronic Care Model Work?

siren Social Interventions Research & Evaluation Network Introducing the Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network

The Patient-Centered Medical Home: an update on the evidence. Perri Morgan, PhD, PA-C Kristine Himmerick, MS, MPAS, PA-C Christine Everett, PhD, PA-C

Two-Year Costs and Quality in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative

Electronic Consultation and Referral (ecr) to Achieve the Quadruple Aim

Strengthening Primary Care for Patients:

UNITED STATES HEALTH CARE REFORM: EARLY LESSONS FROM ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS

During the past several decades, primary care providers in the

NCQA s Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2011 January 31, 2011

of Program Success and

Online Data Supplement: Process and Methods Details

Minnesota Health Care Home Care Coordination Cost Study

30-day Hospital Readmissions in Washington State

Primary Care Meets Population Health: The Parable of Preventable Hospitalizations

NCQA s Patient-Centered Medical Home Recognition and Beyond. Tricia Marine Barrett, VP Product Development

Moving Toward Systemness: Creating Accountable Care Systems

Health Reform and The Patient-Centered Medical Home

Implementing Patient-Centered Medical Home Pilot Projects:

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) have

Value based care: A system overhaul

Patient Centered Medical Home: Transforming Primary Care in Massachusetts

Primary Care Transformation in Academic Medical Centers. Objectives of Session

Home Health Agency (HHA) Medicare Margins: 2007 to 2011 Issue Brief July 7, 2009

Physician Workforce Fact Sheet 2016

Considerations for Spreading Models

The Roadmap to Reduce Disparities

The Collaborative to Advance Social Health Integration (CASHI)

New Jersey HFMA Preparing Your Occupational Mix Survey

Joint Statement on Ambulance Reform

Post Acute Continuum Lessons Learned from Geisinger s ProvenHealth Navigator

Performance Measurement of a Pharmacist-Directed Anticoagulation Management Service

Assessing and Increasing Readiness for Patient-Centered Medical Home Implementation 1

A Journey from Evidence to Impact

There s More Than One Way to Build a Medical Home

Patient-Centered Medical Home: What Is It and How Do SBHCs Fit In?

Low Income Pool (LIP) Tier One Milestone (STC-61) Application for Enhancement Projects. Submitted by:

Transforming Care for Vulnerable Populations:

ORIGINAL REPORTS: PUBLIC HEALTH

21 st Century Health Care: The Promise and Potential of a Learning Health System

Team-Based Care Initiative Interim Report

Click to edit Master title style

Implementing Medicaid Value-Based Purchasing Initiatives with Federally Qualified Health Centers

Transitional Care in the Patient-Centered Medical Home: Lessons in Adaptation

Implementing Teams in a Patient-Centered Medical Home Residency Practice: Lessons Learned

paymentbasics The IPPS payment rates are intended to cover the costs that reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing highquality

A Journey from Evidence to Impact

Improving Care and Managing Costs: Team-Based Care for the Chronically Ill

Title: Developing a response to family violence in primary health care: The New Zealand experience

Transforming Clinical Practice Initiative (TCPI) A Service Delivery Innovation Model. Better Health. Better Care. Lower Cost.

Pay-for-Performance: Approaches of Professional Societies

Using the Teamlet Model to Improve Chronic Care in an Academic Primary Care Practice

Transformational Payment Reform: How will FQHC s survive?

WHY WHAT RISK STRATIFICATION. Risk Stratification? POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT. is Risk-Stratification? HEALTH CENTER

New York University Prevention Research Center

The CAHPS Ambulatory Care Improvement Guide

Cathy Schoen. The Commonwealth Fund Grantmakers In Health Webinar October 3, 2012

Bending the Cost Curve? Results from a Comprehensive Primary Care Payment Pilot. July 2, 2013

Robert H. Miller, PhD Professor of Health Economics. Institute for Health & Aging University of California San Francisco

Federal and state policy makers are. Many Large Medical Groups Will Need To Acquire New Skills And Tools To Be Ready For Payment Reform

A Miracle of Modern Medicine. What medical discovery touches everyone in the United States?

PRIMARY CARE EXTENSION PROGRAM for ILLINOIS: History and Vision. Margaret Gadon MD MPH

Rethinking the model of primary care. Tom Bodenheimer MD Center for Excellence in Primary Care UCSF Department of Family and Community Medicine

Prior to implementation of the episode groups for use in resource measurement under MACRA, CMS should:

ABMS Organizational QI Forum Links QI, Research and Policy Highlights of Keynote Speakers Presentations

Cultural Transformation and the Road to an ACO Lee Sacks, M.D. CEO Mark Shields, M.D., MBA Senior Medical Director

Guidelines for Development and Reimbursement of Originating Site Fees for Maryland s Telepsychiatry Program

Guidance for Developing Payment Models for COMPASS Collaborative Care Management for Depression and Diabetes and/or Cardiovascular Disease

The Healthy People 2010 report calls for a major effort to improve rates. Delivery of Clinical Preventive Services in Family Medicine Offices

California Academy of Family Physicians Diabetes Initiative Care Model Change Package

Using An APCD to Inform Healthcare Policy, Strategy, and Consumer Choice. Maine s Experience

paymentbasics Defining the inpatient acute care products Medicare buys Under the IPPS, Medicare sets perdischarge

Enhancing Caregiver Resilience The Role of Staff Support

Two-Year Effects of the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative on Practice Transformation and Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Outcomes

MACRA & Implications for Telemedicine. June 20, 2016

Going The Distance To Improve The Care Span: The Duel Over The Dual Eligibles And The Implications For Health Reform

Type of intervention Secondary prevention and treatment. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis.

How Many Doctors, Nurses, and Other Health Professionals Do You Need?

Evidence Based Practice: The benefits and challenges of behavioral health services in primary care settings.

South Dakota APRN Coalition s Proposed Legislation FAQs

Value-based Purchasing: Trends in Ambulatory Care

The Patient-Physician Relationship, Primary Care Attributes, and Preventive Services

Health spending in the United States topped $2 trillion for the

Fostering Effective Integration of Behavioral Health and Primary Care in Massachusetts Guidelines. Program Overview and Goal.

OBQI for Improvement in Pain Interfering with Activity

The Workforce Needed to Staff Value-Based Models of Care

2014 MASTER PROJECT LIST

Version 1.0 (posted Aug ) Aaron L. Leppin. Background. Introduction

Evaluation of the effect of nurse education on patient reported foot checks and foot care behaviour of people with diabetes receiving haemodialysis

NCQA WHITE PAPER. NCQA Accreditation of Accountable Care Organizations. Better Quality. Lower Cost. Coordinated Care

Medical Home Renovations: A Patient-centered Medical Home Case Study

Transcription:

Cost Estimates for Operating a Primary Care Practice Facilitation Program Steven D. Culler, PhD 1 Michael L. Parchman, MD 2 Raquel Lozano-Romero, MD 3 Polly H. Noel, PhD 4 Holly J. Lanham, PhD 4 Luci K. Leykum, MD 4 John E. Zeber, PhD 5 1 Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta Georgia 2 MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington 3 Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 4 Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 5 Scott & White Healthcare, Center for Applied Health Research, Temple, Texas ABSTRACT PURPOSE Practice facilitation is widely recognized as a promising method for achieving large-scale practice redesign. Little is known, however, about the cost of providing practice facilitation to small primary practices from the prospective of an organization providing facilitation activities. METHODS We report practice facilitation costs on 19 practices in South Texas that were randomized to receive facilitation activities. The study design assured that each practice received at least 6 practice facilitation visits during the intervention year. We examined only the variable cost associated with practice facilitation activities. Fixed or administrative costs of providing facilitation actives were not captured. All facilitator activities (time, mileage, and materials) were selfreported by the practice facilitators and recorded in spreadsheets. RESULTS The median total variable cost of all practice facilitation activities from start-up through monitoring, including travel and food, was $9,670 per practice (ranging from $8,050 to $15,682). Median travel and food costs were an additional $2,054 but varied by clinic. Approximately 50% of the total cost is attributable to practice assessment and start-up activities, with another 31% attributable to practice facilitation visits. Sensitivity analysis suggests that a 24-visit practice facilitation protocol increased estimated median total variable costs of all practice facilitation activities only by $5,428, for a total of $15,098. CONCLUSIONS We found that, depending on the facilitators wages and the intensity of the intervention, the cost of practice facilitation ranges between $9,670 and $15,098 per practice per year and have the potential to be cost-neutral from a societal prospective if practice facilitation results in 2 fewer hospitalizations per practice per year. Ann Fam Med 2013;11:207-211. doi:10.1370/afm.1496. Confl icts of interest: authors report none. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Steven D. Culler, PhD 1518 Clifton Rd NE Atlanta, GA 30322 sculler@emory.edu INTRODUCTION Improving primary care practices in the United States is a widely agreed-upon strategy for improving access to and quality of health care without increasing costs. 1-6 Practice facilitation is a promising and practical method for supporting practice redesign in small primary care settings. 7-10 Often improvements targeted by practice facilitation programs result in improved quality of care and process outcomes. A recent systematic review found that practices receiving practice facilitation are 2.76 (95% CI, 2.18-3.43) times more likely to make changes necessary to implement evidence-based guidelines and concludes that it is a robust intervention for improving primary care. 11 Although practice facilitation is widely recognized as a promising method for achieving large-scale practice redesign, little is known about its cost. Developing cost estimates associated with administering a practice facilitation program in local or regional primary care settings is necessary to be able to plan for the supporting infrastructure. 12 The purpose of this article is to report the variable costs (those costs that occurred while carrying out all practice facilitation activities) of providing prac- 207

tice facilitation to small primary care practices from the perspective of an organization supporting the program. METHODS Setting and Intervention Our study was conducted in small (1 to 4 clinicians) primary care clinics or practices in south Texas. The design and intervention of this trial have been previously reported. 13 The intervention focused on improving diabetes outcomes by implementing the components of the Chronic Care Model over 12 months. After the initial assessment, facilitators delivered a feedback report with a set of recommended improvement strategies specifi c to each practice. In subsequent meetings, a facilitator met with the practice to identify additional opportunities for improvement, assess current practice needs, and discuss successful implementation strategies used by other clinics. The facilitators conducted at least 6 practice facilitation meetings with the members of each clinical practice during the 12-month intervention period. Data Collection Each week facilitators recorded time, mileage, and materials associated with all activities. Categories of facilitation activities were created so that the time and cost could be consistently recorded across practices by all facilitators. Spreadsheets were reviewed by study coordinators and facilitators to assure consistent resource categorization and to update spreadsheets for new activities during the study period. Fixed or administrative overhead costs, such as for offi ce space, computers, cell phones, or supervision and management activities, were not collected. The scope of this study s facilitation effort (19 practices) was too small to provide reliable estimates of these costs. Facilitation activities undertaken for research purposes only were identifi ed and not included in the analysis. Study investigators independently reviewed the spreadsheet and data elements and categorized activities as either purely related to research or necessary for effective practice facilitation. Areas of disagreement were discussed with the facilitators and consensus reached. COST ESTIMATES FOR PRACTICE FACILITATION Time and Cost Assumptions All facilitator time was rounded to the nearest quarterhour, and a wage of $30 per hour was used to convert practice facilitators reported time into a wage cost. This cost approximates the annual wage plus benefi ts in the study s local labor market. Food expenses were estimated at $10 per person. Finally, it was assumed that every visit to a clinic started at the practice facilitator s offi ce and was round trip. Travel cost was calculated by multiplying trip mileage by $0.50 per mile (the federal income tax reimbursement rate at the time of the study). To demonstrate the impact of varying the hourly wage assumption, we estimated the total variable cost of practice facilitation assuming that practice facilitators earned $40 and $50 per hour. In addition, to provide some insight into the impact of changing the intensity of practice facilitation, we simulated the cost of facilitation activities for 12 and 24 practice facilitator s visits based on the original $30 hourly wage by multiplying the average variable cost per visit and average cost of travel and food per visit by 12 and 24 visits. RESULTS Selected practice characteristics (full-time equivalent staff, health information technology, patient volume, and payer mix) are displayed in Table 1. Practices Table 1. Selected Baseline Characteristics of Clinical Practices Receiving Practice Facilitation Activities (N = 19 practices) Characteristic Mean (SD) Median Range FTE personnel, No. Physicians, medical and osteopathic 1.05 (0.22) 1.0 1-2 Physicians assistants 0.31 (0.58) 0.0 0-1 Nurse practitioners 0.11 (0.31) 0 0-1 Office staff 6.1 (2.4) 5 2-12 Health information technology, % Electronic patient scheduling 94.7 Electronic clinical patient management 63.2 Electronic prescribing 31.6 Electronic referral request submission 31.6 Patient volume per clinician Office visits per day per FTE clinician, No. 24.0 (4.9) 25 18-35 Hospital visits per week, No. 4.08 (7.39) 0 0-25 Practice routinely measures patient satisfaction, 21.2 % Patient insurance status, No. Medicare 30.5 (22.9) 25 0-80 Medicaid 14.5 (20.1) 5 0-80 Capitation 9.6 (17.0) 0 0-48 Fee for service 33.4 (31.1) 30 0-87 Uninsured 11.9 (22.0) 5 0-100 FTE = full-time equivalent. 208

Table 2. Variable Cost of Practice Facilitation and Selected Facilitation Activities Activity Median Cost, $ Key facilitation activity Total variable cost of all practice facilitation activities 7,626 Total travel and food cost of practice facilitation activities 2,054 Total variable cost 9,670 Selected facilitation activity Part A: variable cost of selected start-up activities Facilitation orientation cost 375 Direct time cost of completing baseline evaluation report 3,075 All other variable cost of start-up activities 1,067 Total cost of all start-up activities 4,517 Part B: variable cost for practice facilitation activities Cost for providing baseline feedback report 474 Cost of all facilitation materials provided 660 Cost of all actual practice facilitation activities during study 1,315 Total cost of practice facilitation 2,449 Part C: variable cost of monitoring following the practice facilitation Total cost of all monitoring activities 448 Part D: travel and food cost associated by practice facilitation activities a Total for start-up activities 1,040 Total for practice facilitation activities 919 Total for monitoring activities 95 Total travel and food cost 2,054 a Travel times reflect distance between clinic and facilitator s office, the number of trips, and number of facilitators attending the meeting. Table 3. Simulated Variable Cost of Practice Facilitation Simulation cases Median Cost, $ Simulation 1: Impact of change in hourly wage of practice facilitator on total facilitation cost Estimated total facilitation cost at $40 per hour wage 11,797 Estimated total facilitation cost at $50 per hour wage 13,875 Simulation 2: Impact of change in number of facilitation visits on total facilitation cost Estimated total facilitation cost with 12 practice facilitation visits 11,085 Estimated total facilitation cost with 24 practice facilitation visits 15,098 Note: All simulation cost estimates include the variable cost of food or travel. attempted to implement a variety of improvement strategies. Sixteen practices targeted improvements in patient self-management support and activation, such as providing patients with logbooks to track outcomes and placing educational posters and reading materials in examination rooms. Approximately one-half of the practices initiated or increased the number of staff meetings to discuss clinical quality improvement activities, and 9 of 19 practices initiated short (3- to 5-minute) daily staff huddles to communicate daily workfl ow plans. Another 8 practices implemented delivery system design changes, such as group diabetes visits or point-of-care hemoglobin A 1c testing. Median variable costs of selected facilitation activities can be found in Table 2. Supplemental Table 1 (available at http://annfammed.org/ content/11/3/207/suppl/dc1) contains a detailed breakout of the median cost and the range of costs for selected key components of practice facilitation activities. The median total variable cost of all practice facilitation intervention activities from start-up through monitoring, including travel and food, was $9,670 per practice (range = $8,050 to $15,682). More than 46% of the costs was spent on start-up activities to initiate practice facilitation ($4,517, range = $4,178 to $5,589 per practice [see Supplemental Table 1]). Of this start-up cost, almost 65% was attributable to baseline practice evaluation activities, with the 2 largest cost components being the chart audit ($1,298) and preparing the baseline feedback report ($1,095). The median total variable cost of all facilitation meeting activities (Table 2, part B) was $2,449 per clinic (range = $2,194 to $4,062). The total direct practice facilitation activity cost was split between cost of preparing and presenting baseline feedback reports to the clinics (40% of costs) and the cost of all practice facilitation meeting activities with clinics (60% of costs) during the remainder of the study period. The median total cost of ongoing monitoring and follow-up reporting (Table 2, part C) was $448 (range = $319 to $615). Finally, median travel and food cost (Table 2, part D) was an additional $2,054, but varied by clinic based mainly on the actual distance to the clinic and the number of staff members participating in practice facilitation activities at each clinic. Table 3 displays the median cost estimates for the simulations. Increasing the hourly wage of practice facilitators from $30 to $40 per hour increased the total median variable cost (with travel or food) from $9,670 to $11,797, a 22.0% increase. Cost estimates for raising the hourly wage to $50 per hour are also 209

shown. Doubling the number of facilitation meetings from 6 to 12 only added $1,415 to median total variable costs of all practice facilitation activities. Increasing the number of visits to 24 increased estimated median total variable costs of all practice facilitation activities by $5,428, for a total of $15,098. DISCUSSION The median total cost of a 6-visit practice facilitation intervention focused on improving chronic illness care in small primary care practices is approximately $9,670 per practice per year. This fi nding is consistent with a prior estimate by Hogg and colleagues for a facilitation intervention to improve preventive services. 12 Approximately 47% of the total practice facilitation costs were attributable to practice assessment and start-up activities, with another 25% attributable to facilitation visits. Although some may question the necessity of the assessment and start-up costs, many, if not all, of these small independent practices had no performance data. For buy-in to occur, it was critical to provide practices with a picture of their current clinical performance and operations, which required auditing medical records, undertaking surveys, and conducting interviews with practice staff. During practice assessment, the facilitator was also able to establish a relationship of trust and respect with staff and clinicians, which was essential for effective facilitation. 14,15 If the practice facilitation program were undertaking in a larger health care system in which there were 60 primary care practices, for example, at $9,670 per practice per year, total variable costs over the fi rst year would be approximately $580,000. Assuming an overhead cost rate of 40%, the total costs would be $812,000 in the fi rst year of the program. This study found, however, that much of the cost of practice facilitation is devoted to start-up and practice assessment. As a result, the costs of ongoing facilitation activities in subsequent years are likely to be much lower. Many improvements targeted by practice facilitation programs in primary care may result in a decrease in future hospitalizations. In fact, early fi ndings from patient-centered medical home demonstrations show reductions in emergency department visits and avoidable admissions. 16-18 Medicare ProPAC reported in 2009 (during the study period) that acute care hospital cost per discharge on average ranged from $5,800 to $6,400. 19 Using the lower of these estimates, the break even case for returning variable cost of practice facilitation activities from a delivery system perspective is a reduction in hospitalizations or readmissions by 2 per year per practice. These cost estimates are for variable practice facilitation costs only and do not include the cost of facilitator training or the fi xed costs of offi ce rent, utilities, information technology, etc, which are likely to vary by geographic location. In addition, this study was limited to a single geographic area in one state, which may reduce the generalizability of the cost estimates. We attempted to address this limitation with a sensitivity analysis that varies facilitator s salaries and travel time estimates. Finally, it is important to note that this study did not address the cost to the practice of implementing improvements designed to improve diabetes care and outcomes in response to facilitation. It is likely that these costs are not negligible, as staff and clinicians both invested time meeting with the facilitator and implementing changes between the facilitation visits, time supported by their salaries that did not contribute toward direct patient care. In conclusion, depending on the intensity of the intervention, the median cost of practice facilitation is between $9,670 and $15,098 per practice per year, the cost of between 2 and 3 hospitalizations per year. To read or post commentaries in response to this article, see it online at http://www.annfammed.org/content/11/3/207. Key words: health economics; practice facilitation; primary care practice transformation Submitted August 8, 2012; submitted, revised, November 9, 2012; accepted November 20, 2012. Funding support: This study was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Disorders (R18 DK 075692), This work was also supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Audie L. Murphy Veterans Hospital, Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs. Clinical trials registration: This work follows the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines, and is registered per International Committee of Medical Journal Editors guidelines (Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT00482768). References 1. Meyers DS, Clancy CM. Primary care: too important to fail. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(4):272-273. 2. Margolius D, Bodenheimer T. Transforming primary care: from past practice to the practice of the future. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(5):779-784. 3. Grundy P, Hagan KR, Hansen JC, Grumbach K. The multi-stakeholder movement for primary care renewal and reform. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):791-798. 4. Bodenheimer T, Pham HH. Primary care: current problems and proposed solutions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):799-805. 5. Nutting PA, Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Stange KC, Stewart E, Jaén C. Transforming physician practices to patient-centered medical homes: lessons from the national demonstration project. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(3):439-445. 210

6. Rittenhouse DR, Casalino LP, Shortell SM, et al. Small and mediumsize physician practices use few patient-centered medical home processes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(8):1-10. 7. Grumbach K, Mold JW. A health care cooperative extension service: transforming primary care and community health. JAMA. 2009;301(24):2589-2591. 8. Scutchfield FD. The cooperative medical extension program: translation of medical best practices to practicing primary care providers. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(4):374-376. 9. Nagykaldi Z, Mold JW, Aspy CB. Practice facilitators: a review of the literature. Fam Med. 2005;37(8):581-588. 10. DeWalt D, Powell J, Mainwaring B, et al. Improving performance in Practice National Quality Improvement Team. In: Practice Coaching Program Manual. Princeton, NJ: Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q), George Washington University Medical Center; 2010. 11. Baskerville NB, Liddy C, Hogg W. Systematic review and metaanalysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(1):63-74. 12. Hogg W, Baskerville N, Lemelin J. Cost savings associated with improving appropriate and reducing inappropriate preventive care: cost-consequences analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5(1):20. 13. Parchman ML, Pugh JA, Culler SD, et al. A group randomized trial of a complexity-based organizational intervention to improve risk factors for diabetes complications in primary care settings: study protocol. Implement Sci. 2008;3:15. 14. Lanham HJ, McDaniel RR Jr, Crabtree BF, et al. How improving practice relationships among clinicians and nonclinicians can improve quality in primary care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35(9):457-466. 15. Dogherty EJ, Harrison MB, Graham ID. Facilitation as a role and process in achieving evidence-based practice in nursing: a focused review of concept and meaning. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2010;7(2):76-89. 16. Reid RJ, Coleman K, Johnson EA, et al. The Group Health medical home at year two: cost savings, higher patient satisfaction, and less burnout for providers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):835-843. 17. Gilfillan RJ, Tomcavage J, Rosenthal MB, et al. Value and the medical home: effects of transformed primary care. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(8):607-614. 18. Peikes D, Zutshi A, Genevro JL, Parchman ML, Meyers DS. Early evaluations of the medical home: building on a promising start. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18(2):105-116. 19. Grumbach K, Bainbridge E, Bodenheimber T. Facilitating Improvement in Primary Care: The Promise of Practice Coaching. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2012. Recruit, train, and retain preceptors Teaching Physician is an online, streamlined training program that answers questions and communicates regularly with preceptors on your behalf. It s a unique perk for both your program and your preceptors. Purchase a subscription for your preceptors today! www.teachingphysician.org 211