Online library of Quality, Service Improvement and Redesign tools. Pareto. collaboration trust respect innovation courage compassion

Similar documents
Online library of Quality, Service Improvement and Redesign tools. Discharge planning. collaboration trust respect innovation courage compassion

Public Dissemination of Provider Performance Comparisons

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes

Gantt Chart. Critical Path Method 9/23/2013. Some of the common tools that managers use to create operational plan

Online library of Quality, Service Improvement and Redesign tools. Process templates. collaboration trust respect innovation courage compassion

The 18-week wait programme

Day Case and Short-stay Surgery Benchmarking Review. Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust December 2009

Project Step 3: Investigate the Process.

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes. A guide from NatPaCT

UNC2 Practice Test. Select the correct response and jot down your rationale for choosing the answer.

Select the correct response and jot down your rationale for choosing the answer.

A Step-by-Step Guide to Tackling your Challenges

READMISSION ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS REPORT

Online library of Quality, Service Improvement and Redesign tools. Responsibility charting. collaboration trust respect innovation courage compassion

Emergency admissions to hospital: managing the demand

University of Michigan Health System. Current State Analysis of the Main Adult Emergency Department

Same day emergency care: clinical definition, patient selection and metrics

NUTRITION SCREENING SURVEYS IN HOSPITALS IN NORTHERN IRELAND,

Quality Management and Accreditation

Reducing Elective Waits: Delivering 18 week pathways for patients. Programme Director NHS Elect Caroline Dove.

Utilisation Management

Improving Healthcare Together : NHS Surrey Downs, Sutton and Merton clinical commissioning groups Issues Paper

Therapeutic Apheresis Services. User Satisfaction Survey. April 2017

Patient survey report Mental health acute inpatient service users survey gether NHS Foundation Trust

SNOMED CT. What does SNOMED-CT stand for? What does SNOMED-CT do? How does SNOMED help with improving surgical data?

NHS Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity Data

Improving Quality in Healthcare

Patient survey report Inpatient survey 2008 Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust

NHS Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity Data

Patient survey report Survey of adult inpatients in the NHS 2009 Airedale NHS Trust

NHS Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity Data

Neurosurgery Clinic Analysis: Increasing Patient Throughput and Enhancing Patient Experience

Patient survey report 2004

NoCVA North Carolina Preventing Avoidable Readmissions Collaborative

Lanarkshire NHS board 14 Beckford Street Hamilton ML3 0TA Telephone Fax

NHS Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity Data

Annual provider survey results 94%

NHS Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity Data

NHS Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity Data

NHS Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity Data

NHS Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity Data

Coordinated cancer care: better for patients, more efficient. Background

Continuing NHS Healthcare for Adults in Wales. Public Information Leaflet

Patient survey report Survey of adult inpatients in the NHS 2010 Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

NHS Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity Data

RTT Recovery Planning and Trajectory Development: A Cambridge Tale

Patient survey report Outpatient Department Survey 2009 Airedale NHS Trust

Provide Safe and Effective Medicines Management in Primary Care

Inspecting Informing Improving. Patient survey report Mental health survey 2005 Humber Mental Health Teaching NHS Trust

Review of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Hywel Dda University Health Board. Audit year: Issued: October 2015 Document reference: 491A2015

Solent. NHS Trust. Patient Experience Strategy Ensuring patients are at the forefront of all we do

Minimum Requirements for Coding & Tariff Determination of New Technology - Casper Venter Director HealthMan (Pty) Ltd

Introduction to the Provider Care Management Solutions Web Interface

Heart of America POC Group Quality Management Making it Meaningful

Midlothian Wellbeing Service. First phase evaluation supported by Healthcare Improvement Scotland s Improvement Hub (ihub)

Managing Elective Waiting Times A checklist for NHS health boards

7 NON-ELECTIVE SURGERY IN THE NHS

London Councils: Diabetes Integrated Care Research

Delivering the Five Year Forward View. through Business Intelligence

NHS standard contract letter templates for practice use

Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Project (Example)

RTT Assurance Paper. 1. Introduction. 2. Background. 3. Waiting List Management for Elective Care. a. Planning

S.U.C.C.E.S.S. Project Overview. Project Initiation Document (PID) (Part 1)

BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL SERVICE REVIEWS GREEN PAPER UPDATE: ADULTS SOCIAL CARE INTRODUCTION THE BUDGET NUMBERS

#NeuroDis

Inpatient, Day case and Outpatient Stage of Treatment Waiting Times

TRUST BOARD TB(16) 44. Summary of Lord Carter recommendations Operational productivity and performance in English acute hospitals

How CQC monitors, inspects and regulates independent doctors and clinics providing primary care

Annual Complaints Report 2014/15

Mental Health Crisis Pathway Analysis

Non-Elective Activity Monitoring Devon, Plymouth and Torbay Report,

GLOBAL RATING SCALE (GRS)

Inpatient Experience Survey 2016 Results for Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

Inpatient Experience Survey 2016 Results for Western General Hospital, Edinburgh

How are we doing? Adult Local Services at the heart of our community. Leisure Centre F RUIT & VEG

Inpatient Experience Survey 2016 Results for Dr Gray's Hospital, Elgin

5. Does this paper provide evidence of assurance against the Governing Body Assurance Framework?

Patient survey report Outpatient Department Survey 2011 County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust

Evaluation of an independent, radiographer-led community diagnostic ultrasound service provided to general practitioners

Second Opinion Program. A feature of our Health Advocacy Service

CCG authorisation Case Study Template. NHS Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group. Patient Navigation (PatNav) 3 of 3

NHS WALES INFORMATICS SERVICE DATA QUALITY STATUS REPORT ADMITTED PATIENT CARE DATA SET

Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board

AUTHOR : HELEN BYARD - Lead Cancer Nurse Manager/Head of Nursing Diagnostic and Support Business Unit

Demand and capacity models High complexity model user guidance

Physiotherapy outpatient services survey 2012

Planning guidance National Breaking the Cycle Initiative April 2015

NHS WALES INFORMATICS SERVICE DATA QUALITY STATUS REPORT ADMITTED PATIENT CARE DATA SET

Quality and Governance Committee. Terms of Reference

Patient Reported Outcome Measures Frequently Asked Questions (PROMs FAQ)

LONG PATIENT WAITING TIME AT PRINCESS MARINA HOSPITAL OUT-PATIENT DISPENSARY BY PMH TQM TEAM

IT ALL STARTS WITH YOU

Hospital Generated Inter-Speciality Referral Policy Supporting people in Dorset to lead healthier lives

PG snapshot PRESS GANEY IDENTIFIES KEY DRIVERS OF PATIENT LOYALTY IN MEDICAL PRACTICES. January 2014 Volume 13 Issue 1

PATIENT EXPERIENCE AND INVOLVEMENT STRATEGY

GOVERNING BODY REPORT

Policy for Supporting Pupils with Medical Conditions

NHS performance statistics

Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service Funding. Report to the Sector. Uning Marlina Judith Dwyer Kim O Donnell Josée Lavoie Patrick Sullivan

21 March NHS Providers ON THE DAY BRIEFING Page 1

Transcription:

Online library of Quality, Service Improvement and Redesign tools Pareto collaboration trust respect innovation courage compassion

Pareto What is it? Pareto analysis is a simple technique that helps you to focus efforts on the problems that offer the greatest potential for improvement by showing their relative frequency or size in a descending bar graph. Pareto s 80/20 principle states that roughly 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes. When to use it When analysing a problem, this tool will quickly identify the major causes so that resources can be directed accordingly. You may find it helpful to use a Pareto chart after you have completed a cause and effect (fishbone) diagram to identify which causes to work on first. How to use it 1. Identify the problem area you want to know more about and the possible causes. This can be done using a cause and effect (fishbone) diagram or brainstorming. 2. Collect and analyse data to verify the causes you have identified. Choose the most meaningful unit of measurement that relates to your problem often frequency or cost. Rank the causes from largest to smallest ie compare the relative frequency of the cause. 3. Draw a Pareto graph to illustrate the findings by listing the problem categories on the x-axis (horizontal) and the frequency or cost on the y-axis (vertical). This simple bar chart will help to ensure that your findings are quickly and easily understood by others (see figure 1). You can further enhance this by using a cumulative frequency graph (see figure 2): Draw the cumulative percentage line showing the proportion of the total number that each problem category presents. On the y-axis line, record 100% opposite the total number and 50% at the halfway point. Fill in the remaining percentages drawn to scale. Starting with the highest problem category, mark the upper right hand corner with an X or a dot. Add the total of the next problem category to the first and draw a dot above the bar showing both the cumulative number and percentage. Connect the dots and record the remaining cumulative totals until 100% is reached (see example two).

You can use the Pareto principle to give an insight into a wide variety of issues, for example: 80% of interruptions come from 20% of the people 80% of an equipment budget relates to 20% of the items 80% of benefits come from the first 20% of effort 80% of complaints are about 20% of your services 80% of a nurse s time is spent on 20% of the patients 80% of the decisions made in meetings come from 20% of the meeting time 80% of innovation comes from 20% of the staff 80% of staff problems come from 20% of the staff 80% of your success comes from 20% of your efforts. TIPS Tackle the causes with the highest score/frequency first as these offer the greatest benefit if resolved. Causes with the lowest scores/frequencies may not be worth tackling as solving these problems may not give a good return on investment of time or resources. The 20 20 60 rule claims that in most organisations, 20% of people support process improvement and 20% do not. The people in these two groups are basically fixed and no amount of persuasion is likely to change their view. People in the remaining 60% are interested, but need to be convinced. Applying the 20 20 60 rule suggests focusing on the 60% by addressing their questions and concerns these are the people who are most likely to get involved in service improvement in the future. Examples 1. An improvement team set out to reduce delays in its hospital but was unsure which of the most common causes to tackle first. After collecting data on the causes of delay, the team produced this Pareto chart:

Figure 1: Pareto chart showing cause of delays Cause of delays hospital example Frequency (from 100 records) Poor bed management Wait for diagnosis Senior clinical opinion not available Inappropriate GP referrals Inappropriate follow-ups Cause This graph shows that the main cause of delay was poor bed management. Prior to the Pareto analysis, diagnostics was assumed to be the main cause. As a result, the team allocated resources to improving bed management, significantly reducing delays. 2. This Pareto chart shows that the highest volume operations within a hospital are in general surgery: Figure 2: Pareto chart showing kinds of surgery Anywhere NHS Trust completed operations 2500 120% Number of operations 2000 1500 1000 100% 80% 60% 40% Operations cumulative % 500 20% 0 0% Gen. surg. T&O ENT Cardio Paeds. Urol. Plastics Neuro. OMF Specialty Operations Cumulative %

What next? After using the Pareto technique to identify the causes that have the most potential for improvement when solved, you can produce an action plan to outline the next steps. Additional resources Koch, R (2014) The 80/20 Principle: The Secret to Success by Achieving More with Less, Bolinda Audio: MP3 Una edition Background The Pareto principle was first suggested as an improvement tool by management thinker Joseph Juran in the 1940s and was named after the Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto. In the early 20th century, Pareto observed that 80 percent of income in Italy was received by 20% of the Italian population. Joseph Juran, the renowned quality management author, built on this idea and came up with the assumption that the majority results of any situation can be determined by a small number of causes. This idea is often applied to data such as sales figures ie 20% of clients are responsible for 80% of sales volume, but can easily be applied to the NHS, eg 80% of a nurse s time is spent on 20% of the patients. Statements of 80/20 principles can be tested using the Pareto chart and are useful to support decision making. Richard Koch has written many books on how Pareto can be applied. Written by the ACT Academy for their Quality, Service Improvement and Redesign suite of programmes. Contact: nhsi.act@nhs.net