TRUST BOARD/DIRECTORS GROUP 2016 Key Performance Indicators

Similar documents
NHS performance statistics

NHS performance statistics

NHS Performance Statistics

Quality & Performance Report Author: John Adler Sponsor: Chief Executive Date: FIC, PPP + QAC 28 th September Executive Summary from CEO

Reducing emergency admissions

Learning from Patient Deaths: Update on Implementation and Reporting of Data: 5 th January 2018

FOREWORD Introduction from the Chief Executive 2 BACKGROUND 3 OUR TRUST VALUES 4 OUR AIMS FOR QUALITY 5 HOW WE MEASURE QUALITY 16

ESHT Our ambition to be outstanding by 2020

Reference costs 2016/17: highlights, analysis and introduction to the data

Board of Director s Meeting

NHS Rushcliffe CCG Governing Body Meeting. CCG Improvement and Assurance Framework. 15 March 2018

Implementing NHS Services Seven Days a Week

QUALITY STRATEGY

NHS LANARKSHIRE QUALITY DASHBOARD Board Report October 2011 (Data available as at end August 2011)

Discharge to Assess Standards for Greater Manchester

Nottingham University Hospitals Emergency Department Quality Issues Related to Performance

Mental Health Crisis Pathway Analysis

21 March NHS Providers ON THE DAY BRIEFING Page 1

Integrated Performance Report

Quality Accounts: Corroborative Statements from Commissioning Groups. Nottingham NHS Treatment Centre - Corroborative Statement

Appendix 1: South Lanarkshire H&SCP Improvement Plan 2017/18.

Improvement and Assessment Framework Q1 performance and six clinical priority areas

Integrated Quality Report

Hard Truths Public Board 29th September, 2016

THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Board Paper - Cover Sheet. Nursing & Patient Services Director

April Clinical Governance Corporate Report Narrative

Dudley & Walsall Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust Board

Excellent Care for All Quality Improvement Plans (QIP): Progress Report for the 2015/16 QIP

A&E Attendances and Emergency Admissions

Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratios

Balanced Scorecard. Paper 5.2. TRUST BOARD 24 th September 2015 TITLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Trust Board Meeting: Wednesday 13 May 2015 TB

SOUTHAMPTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST Trust Key Performance Indicators May Regular report to Trust Board

SOUTHAMPTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST National Inpatient Survey Report July 2011

Therapeutic Apheresis Services. User Satisfaction Survey. April 2017

Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Partnership NHS Trust. Operational Plan

Richard Wilson, Quality Insight and Intelligence Director

Patient survey report Outpatient Department Survey 2011 County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust

The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust

NHS Patient Survey Programme 2016 Emergency Department Survey

WAITING TIMES 1. PURPOSE

2. The mental health workforce

Mortality Report Learning from Deaths. Quarter

Quality Dashboard. September Graph Legend. Legend / key Forecasts. Shows whether next month s position will meet the standard

ENCLOSURE: J. Date of Trust Board 29 February Pressure Ulcer Clinical Improvement Programme. Purpose of Report

Therapeutic Apheresis Services. User Satisfaction Survey. June 2016

Newham Borough Summary report

Urgent Care Strategy

Public Services Reform (Scotland) Bill. Scottish Independent Hospitals Association

Physician Performance Analytics: A Key to Cost Savings

Emergency admissions to hospital: managing the demand

Quality & Performance Report. Public Board

Percent Unadjusted Inpatient Mortality (NHSL Acute Hospitals) Numerator: Total number of in-hospital deaths

Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Corporate Strategy

Patients Experience of Emergency Admission and Discharge Seven Days a Week

Assessing Quality of Hospital Services - the importance of national clinical audits

SOUTHAMPTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST Trust Key Performance Indicators April Regular report to Trust Board

Research, Education and Training Committee Chair s Report from 4 September Public Board Meeting. 27 September 2018

Framework for NHS provider and commissioner involvement in: Maximising the appropriate use of care homes

CASE STUDY The Safer Patients Initiative

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

Operational Focus: Performance

NHS England Congenital Heart Disease Provider Impact Assessment

2017/18 Trust Balanced Scorecard

Quality and Efficiency Support Team (QuEST) Directorate for Health Workforce and Performance

Performance of the NHS provider. sector for the quarter ended 30. June 2018

Unscheduled care Urgent and Emergency Care

The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Clinical Assurance Toolkit (CAT) Strategy

WEST HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Based on performance data available as at 11 th January 2018

TRUST BOARD TB(16) 44. Summary of Lord Carter recommendations Operational productivity and performance in English acute hospitals

Ruth McCarthy, Associate Director Clinical Governance/IP&C

Patient survey report Outpatient Department Survey 2009 Airedale NHS Trust

Integrated Performance Report

Policy on Learning from Deaths

Issue 4: October 2014

National Health Promotion in Hospitals Audit

COVENTRY AND RUGBY CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP

SUMMARY OF INDICATOR CHANGES FOR VERSION 3 INTELLIGENT MONITORING REPORTS Acute and Specialist NHS Trusts 23 June Final Draft, Subject to Change

NHS LANARKSHIRE QUALITY DASHBOARD Board Report June 2011 (Data available as at end April 2011)

NHS TAYSIDE MORTALITY REVIEW PROGRAMME

Integrated Performance Report

North West COPD Report Nov 2011

Paper 8 DECISION NOTE. Recommendation

Service Transformation Report. Resource and Performance

Delayed Transfers of Care Statistics for England 2016/17

Key facts and trends in acute care

Results of the 2012/2013 Hospice Patient Survey. General Report. Centre for Health Services Studies. Linda Jenkins and Jan Codling.

A&E Attendances and Emergency Admissions

NHS BOLTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP Public Board Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO: 10. Date of Meeting:.24 th March 2017.

NHS Wales Delivery Framework 2011/12 1

What do the numbers say about emergency readmissions to hospital? October 2017

SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HELD ON 16 MARCH 2016

Adzuna Job Market Report!! August 2016!

Working in partnership to improve the identification and treatment of sepsis

Appendix 1. Quality Update Report for Salford CCG Open Board. Salford Royal, Oaklands and other providers of clinical services November 2013

Evaluation of NHS111 pilot sites. Second Interim Report

Best Care Clinical Strategy Principles for the next 10 years of Best Care. Dr Caroline Allum, Executive Medical Director

Authors: Head of Outcomes & Effectiveness, Quality Project Manager and Deputy MD, Sponsor: Medical Director

The National Institute for Health Research

Monthly and Quarterly Activity Returns Statistics Consultation

Transcription:

TRUST BOARD/DIRECTORS GROUP 2016 Key Performance Indicators Introduction This paper provides an update on our progress towards our vision to be England s best acute teaching trust in 2016 and beyond. The Trust Board on 25 th April 2013 approved a trajectory for thirteen key performance indicators (KPIs) and a methodology for measuring our overall performance. It was agreed that our progress would be reviewed every six months (April and October). It is also recognised, following Board discussions, that there is a desire to refresh the dialogue with employees, patients and carers and other stakeholders regarding the delivery of the vision to 2016 and beyond. Trust Progress towards 2016 Vision By aiming to be within the top three (top quartile performance), 8 of the 13 KPIs have already been achieved and the remainder are expected to be achieved by the end of 2016/7. Table 1: Trust Progress towards 2016 Vision Ambition Met Strategic Aims Indicator (Top Quartile Performance) Summary Hospital-Level Mortality (SHMI) - Index Clinical MRSA cases per 100000 bed days Outcomes C-Diff cases per 100000 bed days Will be met by 2016 Standardised emergency readmissions within 28 days of discharge Patient Patient Experience: Friends and Family test Experience Performance Aggregate (Number of performance targets not achieved) Will be met by 2016 Percentage of staff receiving job-relevant training, learning or Will be met by 2016 development in last 12 months (staff survey) Teaching and GMC survey of doctors in training - Overall Satisfaction Score [2] Learning Will be met by 2016 Nurses & AHPs - league table university courses (Complete University Guide: overall satisfaction score) Research and Development Patients recruitment into clinical trials (per 1000 outpatient first attendances) Staff Staff engagement metric satisfaction Value for Money Monitor Continuity of Services Risk Rating Reference Cost Index (RCI) MFF Adjusted Will be met by 2016 KPI Trajectory For each of the 13 KPIs, Appendix 1 shows the definition of being the best and the expected trajectory for the 5 years to 2018/19. 5 trajectories have been revised, with the original shown in parentheses. Our peer trusts are also seeking to improve their performance and the top quartile ambition has become more challenging for three KPIs: mortality (SHMI), staff receiving training and reference costs (RCI). As our peers are likely to continue to improve we will need to work hard to maintain and improve our relative position. Each top quartile target and trajectory will be reviewed every six months and is likely to become increasingly challenging.

Progress by Indicator The KPI Dashboard (Table 2) shows current NUH performance. The horizontal bar chart shows NUH relative performance to both the peer mean and the general spread (in quartiles) of all other acute trusts in England. SHMI Our SHMI is significantly better than the all acute trust average and is within top quartile peer performance. Compared to 2012, our SHMI has improved in the 12 months to June 2013 (from 93.2 to 91.4), whereas top quartile performance among peers has declined (from 91.7 to 93.0). The future trajectory is flat: i.e. we aim to maintain an SHMI of 92 or below. MRSA - In the 11 months to February 2014, we are the top performing trust among our peers and within the top quartile for all acute trusts. The trajectory for MRSA has been revised downwards to show us maintaining (or improving) the current rate of 0.4 cases for 100000 bed days. C-DIFF Our performance in 11 months to February 2014 is better than the trajectory target, but is not as good as the average of peers or the average of all trusts. We have maintained a ranking of 9 th among the 12 peers. The trajectory has been revised to reflect the more challenging peer upper quartile of 14 cases per 100,000 bed days. 28 day Readmissions - Our performance has improved significantly in the 12 months to January 2014. We are within the top quartile and we are now ranked 3 rd among the 12 peers. The future trajectory has been revised to show us maintaining our current level. Friends and Family Test Our improving score places the Trust within the top quartile among peers and within the top quartile among all acute providers. We are now ranked 3 rd among the 12 peers. The future trajectory has been revised to show us maintaining our current level. Performance Targets We are currently failing to achieve three performance targets. Although this is close to the top quartile for peer trusts, our aim is to meet all of our performance targets. Staff receiving relevant training Following top quartile performance in 2012, the proportion of staff receiving training at NUH fell slightly in 2013 and is now close to peer average (which improved) and we are ranked 7 th among peers. The trajectory has been amended to reflect 2013 performance of NUH and its peers. Doctor satisfaction with training Although we are ranked 10 th among peers, our satisfaction score is close to the peer top quartile because there is very little variation in the score among the best performing peers. We expect to reach top quartile performance by 2016. Student Nurses and AHP satisfaction - We remain in the top quartile of peers. In 2013, we were ranked second, behind Manchester, in the Complete University Guide, after being ranked first in 2012. Patients recruited to clinical trials We remain in the top quartile of peers, ranked fourth. Staff engagement metric - We remain in the top quartile of peers, ranked third. Monitor continuity of services risk rating Our risk rating falls within the peer top quartile and we are ranked equal third among peers. Reference Cost Index Our RCI has fallen significantly from 102 to 99, but the reference costs of our peers have also improved. Our reference costs are better (lower) than the average for peers and all trusts and we

expect to be within the peer top quartile by 2016. The trajectory has been amended to reflect 2012/13 performance of NUH and its peers. Recommendations We ask the Trust Board to: 1. Note current performance 2. Approve the summary of progress towards 2016 for incorporation into the Annual Report 3. Comment on the additional actions required to ensure delivery by 2016 4. Review and approve the revised KPI trajectory for incorporation into the Integrated Business Plan. 5. Receive an update every 6 months Sam Porter Strategic Planning Manager 9 h April 2014

Appendix 1: Trajectory for 13 KPIs Strategic Aims Clinical Outcomes Patient Experience Teaching and Learning Research and Development Summary Hospital-Level Mortality (SHMI) - Index MRSA cases per 100000 bed days C-Diff cases per 100000 bed days Standardised emergency readmissions within 28 days of discharge Patient Experience: Friends and Family test Performance Aggregate (Number of performance targets not achieved) Percentage of staff receiving job-relevant training, learning or development in last 12 months (staff survey) GMC survey of doctors in training - Overall Satisfaction Score [2] Nurses & AHPs - league table university courses (Complete University Guide: overall satisfaction score) Patients recruitment into clinical trials (per 1000 outpatient first attendances) Staff satisfaction Staff engagement metric Value for Money Indicator Monitor Continuity of Services Risk Rating Reference Cost Index (RCI) MFF Adjusted Period of current data Current NUH perfor mance Target 2013/ 14 2014/ 15 2015/ 16 2016/ 17 2017/ 18 Definition of "Being the best" Jul 2012-93.0 91.4 92.2 92.2 92.2 92.2 92.2 92.2 SHMI significantly better than the average for Jun 2013 (91.7) (93.2) all acute trusts and in top quartile among peers 2013 To Feb 14 1.1 0.4 2.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Continue reduction in MRSA rates to achieve (0.4) (0.6) (1.7) (1.3) (1.0) (0.7) and remain in best quartile 2013 To Feb 14 14 17.9 20 16 15 14 13 13 Eliminate all avoidable Cdiff cross infections 2016 (2013) (20) Feb 2013-96 91 108 91 91 91 91 91 Achieve a continued improvement and be in the 2013 (2016) Jan 2014 (106) (104) (101) (98) (98) (98) top 3 (top quartile) among peers by 2016 Jan-14 76 79 68 79 79 80 80 80 Achieve a continued improvement and be in the 2013 (2016) (77) (72) (76) top 3 (top quartile) among peers by 2016 Latest 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Achieve all performance targets 2014 (2013) Data (2) 2013 84% 82% 76% 84% 84% 84% 84% 84% Achieve results within the top 3 (top quartile) 2014 (2012) (82%) (84%) (78%) (79%) (80%) (80%) (80%) 2018/ 19 2013 81.3 80.2 80.2 80.8 81.3 81.3 81.3 81.3 Achieve results within the top 3 (top quartile) 2013 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Maintain best performance among peers 2012 2012/13 60 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 2013 3.8 3.9 (3.8) Q4 2013/14 Current top quartile peer performance [1] 2012/13 Achieve results within the top 3 (top quartile) 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 Achieve results within the top 3 (top quartile) 2.8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 99 (102) NUH Performance Trajectory 101 98 (100) We will maintain a Continuity of Services Risk rating of 3 and remain within the best 3 of our 12 peers Our costs will be below average for all acute trusts and in top quartile among peers NOTES Where there are changes from the table presented at TB in October 2013, original shown in parentheses [1] Peer performance is also likely to improve so the upper quartile target will be reviewed every six months and is likely to become increasingly challenging [2] Measure revised to overall satisfaction score (out of 100) Year Ambition First Achieved 2016 2012 (2016) 2012 2012 2016 (2015)

Appendix 2 Dashboard Progress Strategic Aims Indicator Basis Period Trend NUH Rank 1 = Best 13 = Worst Top performing peer trust Summary Hospital-Level Mortality (SHMI) Annual Jul 2012- Jun 2013 4 Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FT Clinical Outcomes: Our patients will achieve the best health outcomes in England through our delivery of safe, effective, evidence-based care MRSA per 100,000 Occcupied Bed Days C-Diff per 100,000 Occupied Bed Days YTD To Feb 14 1 YTD To Feb 14 9 Nottingham University University Hospital Southampton Patient Experience: Our patients and their families choose NUH as their care provider of choice because of the high quality of care we deliver and the active way we involve them in care decisions Teaching and Learning: We will be recognised for having a learning environment where all students and staff continuously and pro-actively seek knowledge and skills to achieve excellence in all aspects of healthcare delivery Standardised emergency readmissions within 28 days of discharge Annual Feb 2013- Jan 2014 Friends and Family Test Month Jan-14 3 Performance Aggregate Latest Data Available Staff Survey - Percentage of staff receiving job-relevant training, learning Annual 2013 7 or development in last 12 months GMC survey of doctors in training - Overall Satisfaction Nurses & AHPs - league table university courses Annual 2013 10 Annual 2013 1 3 =3 Of Leicester NHS Trust Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Nottingham University Research and Development: We will develop internationally recognised research and innovation, which helps deliver excellent care to our community Patient recruitment to clinical trials per 1000 outpatients attendances Staff Satisfaction: Our staff are recognised as among the best in the country in terms of the Staff survey results Staff provision of caring, safe and thoughtful care. NUH will ensure each individual Engagement metric is able to contribute to and influence the future of the organisation, the job they do, their career and skills and our role in the community Value for Money: We will be known as a high performing care provider, with consistently excellent service delivered cost effectively. We will continuously challenge our established business models. Monitor Financial Risk Rating (FRR) Reference Cost Index (RCI) MFF Adjusted Annual 2012/13 4 Annual 2013 3 Quarterly Q4 2013/14 Annual 2012/13 5 =3 Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FT Cambridge, Birmingham (=1) Leeds Teaching