Learning from deaths: one year on. 14 December 2017

Similar documents
Learning from Deaths Policy

Learning from Deaths Framework Policy

h. HULL AND EAST YORKSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY. Broad Recommendations / Summary

Learning from the Deaths of Patients in our Care Policy

Learning from Deaths Policy. This policy applies Trust wide

Learning from Deaths Trust Board in public

Mortality Report Learning from Deaths. Quarter

Learning From Deaths Policy

Using the structured judgement review method

Learning from Patient Deaths: Update on Implementation and Reporting of Data: 5 th January 2018

MORTALITY REVIEW POLICY

Learning from Deaths Policy A Framework for Identifying, Reporting, Investigating and Learning from Deaths in Care.

Policy on Learning from Deaths

Mortality Policy. Learning from Deaths

FT Keogh Plans. Medway NHS Foundation Trust

Unique Identifier: Review Date: November Issue Status: Approved Version No: 1.4 Issue Date: November 2017

FOREWORD Introduction from the Chief Executive 2 BACKGROUND 3 OUR TRUST VALUES 4 OUR AIMS FOR QUALITY 5 HOW WE MEASURE QUALITY 16

LEARNING FROM DEATHS (Mortality Policy)

Mortality Policy - Learning from Deaths (CG627)

Decision Discussion Information

Learning from Deaths Policy LISTEN LEARN ACT TO IMPROVE

Learning from Deaths Policy

Evidence Search Completed by..joanne Phizacklea.Date

Appendix 1 MORTALITY GOVERNANCE POLICY

Document Title Investigating Deaths (Mortality Review) Policy

Vision 3. The Strategy 6. Contracts 12. Governance and Reporting 12. Conclusion 14. BCCG 2020 Strategy 15

Quality and Safety Strategy

Authors: Head of Outcomes & Effectiveness, Quality Project Manager and Deputy MD, Sponsor: Medical Director

SWH Mortality Review Policy

Learning from Deaths; Mortality Review Policy

Specialist mental health services

Policy on Learning from Deaths

NHS and independent ambulance services

Learning from Deaths Policy

Learning from Deaths Policy

MORTALITY REVIEW & LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY

Active date: 25 th Sept Exclusions: None

Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols

CO119, Learning from Deaths policy

RBCH Actions to meet CQC Essential Standards

A safe system framework for recognising and responding to children at risk of deterioration. July 2016

Whittington Health Trust Board

Quality Strategy

Patient Safety. At the heart of all we do

Learning from adverse events. Learning and improvement summary

TRUST CORPORATE POLICY RESPONDING TO DEATHS

Patient safety in the NHS in England and the development of the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB)

Quality Improvement Strategy

Quality Accounts: Corroborative Statements from Commissioning Groups. Nottingham NHS Treatment Centre - Corroborative Statement

Status: Information Discussion Assurance Approval. Claire Gorzanski, Head of Clinical Effectiveness

NHS Nursing & Midwifery Strategy

Learning from Deaths - Mortality Report

PATIENT EXPERIENCE AND INVOLVEMENT STRATEGY

Mortality Report. 1. Introduction / Background

QUALITY STRATEGY

Freedom to Speak Up Review

Yorkshire & the Humber Acute Kidney Injury Patient Care Initiative (AKIPCI)

The Yorkshire & Humber Improvement Academy Clinical Leadership Training Programme

CRM012 - Identifying, Reporting, Investigating And Learning From Deaths In Care

LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY

Title of report Freedom to Speak Up Guardian (FSUG) Trust Board in public

Trust Board Meeting: Wednesday 13 May 2015 TB

Quality Accounts For Northern Pathways 2014/15

Seven Day Services Clinical Standards September 2017

RM57 HOSPITAL MORTALITY REVIEW POLICY

High level guidance to support a shared view of quality in general practice

Quality Improvement Strategy

BOARD CLINICAL GOVERNANCE & QUALITY UPDATE MARCH 2013

End of Life Care Strategy

Patient Experience Strategy. Director of Nursing & Quality

Guidelines for the Management of Patients who are End of Life

Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust End of Life Care Strategy

Job Description. CNS Clinical Lead

Our Achievements. CQC Inspection 2016

Bereavement Policy. 1 Purpose of Policy 2. 2 Background 2. 3 Staff Responsibilities 3. 4 Operational Issues and Local Policies/Protocols/Guidelines 4

Learning from Deaths Policy

Appendix A: University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Draft Action Plan in Response to CQC Recommendations

Job Description. Specialist Nurse with Responsibility for Acute Liaison Band 7

Associate Director of Patient Safety and Quality on behalf of the Director of Nursing and Clinical Governance

Date of publication:june Date of inspection visit:18 March 2014

NHS Borders Feedback and Complaints Annual Report

CLINICAL AND CARE GOVERNANCE STRATEGY

NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL NHS TRUST. PATIENT ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICY (Previously known as Waiting List Management Policy) Documentation Control

WEST OF ENGLAND ACADEMIC HEALTH SCIENCE NETWORK. Patient Safety Collaborative Annual Report 2016/17. Page 1 of 9

Quality Strategy (Refreshed March 2015)

End of Life Care Strategy PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2017

Quality and Safety Improvement Strategy

NHS TAYSIDE MORTALITY REVIEW PROGRAMME

Recognise and Rescue: A hospital wide collaboration to improve response to the deteriorating patient at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Safety in Mental Health Collaborative

The Care Values Framework

NHS Isle of Wight Clinical Commissioning Group: Governing Body

Elaine Andrews, Assistant Director of Nursing & Safety and Caroline Booton Quality Analyst Jill Asbury, Acting Director of Nursing

PATIENT AND SERVICE USER EXPERIENCE STRATEGY

Patient Experience Strategy

Job Description. Job title: Uro-Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist Band: 7

Quality Strategy To care, to see, to learn, to improve

Quality Framework Healthier, Happier, Longer

Complaints, Compliments and Concerns (CCC) Policy

Transcription:

Learning from deaths: one year on 14 December 2017

Registration and refreshments WIFI network: NHS Improvement WIFI password: LearningFD2 Glisser: glsr.it/lfd2

Welcome Mrs Celia Ingham Clark Medical Director for Clinical Effectiveness, NHS England and Interim NHS National Director of Patient Safety NHS Improvement

What is Glisser? Glisser is an interactive tool we re using today to help you ask questions and feed back your views. It s completely anonymous, but please keep the conversation productive and be sensitive to everyone in the room. You can like a question to push it up the list, so we know which are the important issues in the room. All questions are recorded and will help us write a summary of the event, and will be used to help develop the guidance on learning from deaths.

How to use Glisser Logging in: Type this web address into your web browser: glsr.it/lfd2 If you have any problems logging in using the above instructions: - go to www.glisser.com - enter our event code LFD2 into the box in the bottom left hand corner of the webpage - Click Join

Asking questions Click this icon to ask a question. Simply type your question and press send. Your question will be sent to everyone. You can like other people s questions by pressing the thumbs up icon to the right hand side of the question. This pushes the question to the top of the list.

How to Glisser Click this icon to like a slide.

Making notes on slides Click this icon to make your own personal notes on the current slide. These will not be shared, but you can download them at the end of the session

Working with families as partners Josephine Ocloo and David Smith Family Members Learning from Deaths Programme Board

Compassion and Living Your Values Treat people with respect, kindness, care and compassion - too many people feel they didn t have this experience at the worst time of their lives. Families should be listened to and believed; not treated as the problem. Staff should recognise that families are grieving - they need to be mindful of their language and never disparaging. Staff need to recognise that when families speak up, they re only seeking the truth - don t simply tag them as troublemakers. 10

Communication Families will only hear the news that their loved one has died once. Clarity - a need to talk in plain understandable language. Transparency, openness and honesty must underpin all communication. Timescales should be clearly agreed with families and adhered to. Need consistent and clear communication with families. Need information about how to access medical and other records. Easy infographic guides and checklists should be provided for families. 3

Independence of Investigatory Systems Too many families find themselves having to become detectives. Deaths investigated if families push needs someone else to push. Families feel they have to fight against a culture that places corporate defensiveness above a corporate concern for the truth. All investigations must be and be seen to be independent. Regulators should sign up to principles of independence and transparency and not close ranks. Be honest lost notes etc. are seen as indicators of cover ups.

Imbalance of power The power imbalance can t be underestimated. Compared to families, Trusts have significant finance and resources, including: Legal support Understanding and control of : the processes the technicalities of the system the language of clinicians and NHS speak And Trust staff have access to support - families have to find their own The playing field must be levelled. 13

Empowering families Families should be central in investigations and treated as equals. Need a person-centred approach; a sympathetic environment; and respect for patient rights. Need a right to access all key information/medical records; and funded legal advice. Need strong sanctions when medical records are lost or missing. The CQC should contact and engage with families where there s been an Serious Incident (SI).

Empowering families (continued) Families need increased levels of independent support across the process, including: Free advocacy/support and signposting to the right information A person to support them in establishing the truth Ability to request a coroner from outside the local area; or post mortem by another Trust Counselling for families A review of PALS/Family Liaison Services

Balancing Learning and Accountability Families want learning but feel they also have a right to accountability. CULTURE change is essential in moving things forward and requires strong leadership. There should be penalties and sanctions when wrongdoing occurs and rewards for learning Being human - the culture is set from the leadership of the organisation. Saying sorry is important BUT it has to be genuine. Learning within one Trust needs to be shared with others. 7

Reflections on the journey so far Philip Dunne MP Minister of State for Health

Reflections on the journey so far Professor Ted Baker Chief Inspector of Hospitals Care Quality Commission

Embedding learning from deaths within the work of trusts Dr Nigel Kennea Consultant Neonatologist and Associate Medical Director St George s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Learning from Deaths - Building processes to support and learn Dr NL Kennea Associate Medical Director St George s Hospitals NHS FT

Summary of Presentation What we wish to achieve Challenges Our experience, what we have learned Future plans

What we wish to achieve Learning from deaths is about doing the right thing Building systems to understand deaths and support improvements Open information and family involvement Data and information / reporting Vital to link mortality review work to other Trust governance structures / processes to fully support families and improve care The case review is the start not the end of a process

Challenges Time and timeliness of case reviews / Independence of review Defining value amongst other quality measures (Reporting vs Learning) How best to involve and support families Health systems are complex Care pathways / other providers Build systems to collate information and learn Majority of case reviews have learning

Developing Processes All deaths reviewed in local M+M Service level mortality reviews Trust level mortality reviews

Trust-level Processes Identification of deaths and timely case review Support of families and processes in bereavement office Feed into essential work relating to specific patient groups Rapid escalation of care issues to drive change and learning Collation of data and Board-level oversight / challenge

Unadjusted mortality timely data

Unadjusted mortality timely data

Trust-level Processes Consultant review of deaths in bereavement office from case-notes (all reviewers trained in RCP review methodology) Seamless and timely escalation to clinical team and trust-level governance structures for investigation and/or learning Clear and sensitive communication with families IT systems and dedicated manager to collate data and information

Reviews of Deaths 160 140 120 100 80 Reviewed 60 40 20 0 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

Cases reviewed since April 833 full case notes reviewed 38 child deaths (15 NNU,16 PICU) 7 deaths notified to LeDeR programme 8 deaths in patients with mental health diagnoses 63 cases escalated for local investigation / action 11 case reviews identified potentially significant care issue requiring highlevel investigation 11/833 = 1.32%

Proportion of reviews Interval between death and case review 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Number of days Data: Sept Nov 2017

Benefits of early independent case review Identify and support families with immediate concerns Early identification of care issues that require action / investigation Adverse incidents Interaction with other health providers Support improved bereavement processes Death certification Coroner s referral Support specialist mortality review programmes

What we have learned Efficient bereavement processes improve experience of families Open culture of asking and creating mechanism for families to raise concerns is helpful poster, booklet, survey, email Teams and other providers appreciative of rapid feedback Abundant opportunities to learn and improve the need to develop systems to triangulate information Issues of care contributing to death are fortunately rare. Strong central team enables timely data collection and reporting

Examples: Learning from recent case reviews Communication / Escalation ITU escalation / care planning / end of life care Handover / Transfer of care Inter-hospital referral Documentation Community dialysis patients NG tubes Operative risks / MDT involvement / consent Processes of care Out of hospital arrests Sepsis bundles Thrombectomy

Future Plans Enhance family communication and support Ensure care group review processes strengthened - further training Monitor the learning ensure sustainability champions Ensure seamless feed into other trust governance and improvement work Work with other providers

Summary Mortality data is one of several important quality metrics Timely case note review is an important way of identifying, and learning from, problems in care and supporting families Many care issues may (should) be identified by other routes Focus needs to be on improving care and learning Case mix and care pathways adds complexity Challenges in managing processes, data and outcomes

http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2017/11/02/ollie-minton-et-al-learning-from-deaths/ learningfromdeaths@stgeorges.nhs.uk

Embedding learning from deaths within the work of trusts Dr Andrew Gibson Consultant Neurologist and Deputy Medical Director Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; and Clinical Lead for National Mortality Case Record Review

Learning From Deaths Dr Andrew Gibson Dr Paul Whiting

The Challenge PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

People, Process & Technology in our Current System PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Elements of a model QUEST Cardiac Arrest reduction Medical Examiner role Informatics and Modelling Mortality Group Yorkshire and Humber AHSN Structured Judgement Review Mortality Governance Committee PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

People, Process & Technology in the Current System Medical Examiner role PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Medical Examiner Our experience to date in Sheffield Independent Considerable expertise in reviewing inpatient and community deaths Invaluable in liaising with families and highlighting/alleviating concerns Key in quickly identifying concerns with care that may have contributed to or caused death, that require further timely review 23,000 Deaths Reviewed Family concerns identified in 2.3% of deaths Concerns with care in 9% of all deaths PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Medical Examiner Dataset includes Emergency/elective Cause of death Incident reports Safeguarding Learning disability Narrative of events DNACPR status Hospital acquired infections Coroner referral/decision Attending doctor concerns Medical examiner concerns Family concerns Referral to clinical governance/medical Directors Office PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

How did we bring it all together? QUEST Cardiac Arrest reduction Structured Judgement Review PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST Medical Examiner role Learning From EVERY Death model Informatics and Modelling Mortality Group Yorkshire and Humber AHSN Mortality Governance Committee

How we say something about every death at STHFT Medical Examiners Office Review of the death within 24 hours National/HES/SHMI/HSMR Data alerts Medical Director / Nurse Director SUI Group Immediate Escalation Yes Review using SJR methodology within 72 hours Was the death felt to be avoidable? Secondary Review Was the death felt to be avoidable? SJR Review Indicated No No No Learning from the review collated for further escalation and reporting Review Process Mortality Governance Committee/MD and Chief Nurses Office Healthcare Governance Committee Quarterly Review and Board Report Present to SRMB, HCG, Board, Inform further Trust wide and Local Service/Quality improvement

Our key priorities when developing a model Board level engagement Non-Executive oversight Medical Examiner at the core Ensure independence and timeliness Informed Quality Improvement Family involvement Shared ward, Trust, regional and national learning Quality assured Robust and sustainable PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Resource to ensure ALL deaths have a Medical Examiner review All those with concerns have an in-depth independent SJR review Concerns are escalated in a timely manner Central oversight and dissemination of the learning from ALL deaths Involvement of families from the earliest opportunity PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Barriers and Difficulties Resource allocation Training and Recruitment Competing Priorities QI processes PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Resource Modelling PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Resource Modelling COMPLEX! PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Summary A national journey of learning from deaths This is not resource neutral Promote iteration and evolution This is the model that we have chosen, but one size does not fit all PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Q&A WIFI network: NHS Improvement WIFI password: LearningFD2 Glisser: glsr.it/lfd2

Table discussion WIFI network: NHS Improvement WIFI password: LearningFD2 Glisser: glsr.it/lfd2

Refreshment break WIFI network: NHS Improvement WIFI password: LearningFD2 Glisser: glsr.it/lfd2

Working with families to improve care and support Katie Siobhan Family Member Olivia Butterworth Head of Public Participation, NHS England

Learning from Deaths Working with families as partners Katie Smith, Family Member and Olivia Butterworth, Head of Public Participation, NHS England

Where have the questions come from? NHS England held a two-day event in November ~ 75 family members and advocates involved NHS England invited ~30 family members to be involved in today s event Two x 2.5hr webinars recently held with these families to decide on the questions for today NHS Improvement have further added their questions to these 59

What we d like you to do: Each table has been allotted two questions each. If you have time, you can choose a further question. A family member will introduce each question and might possibly explain their related experience. As before, please then write your comments on cards (about 5-9 words on each one). Plenary: Your table facilitator will have less than two minutes to feedback please agree on two key points or actions per question. 60

Question Themes: Perception of recourse solely for financial recompense. Independence for investigators. Creating a just, open and learning organisational culture. Access to independent advice, advocacy and support. The power imbalance between families and organisations. Listening to and involving families and carers before things go wrong. Truth and reconciliation for harmed families. How will trusts demonstrate their words. 61

Last, but not least: Please be open warts and all! Please consider: What do you / your trust currently do? What gets in the way of doing the right thing? What support do you need? How can you address these questions locally with families and carers? 62

Table discussion WIFI network: NHS Improvement WIFI password: LearningFD2 Glisser: glsr.it/lfd2

Plenary feedback and discussion WIFI network: NHS Improvement WIFI password: LearningFD2 Glisser: glsr.it/lfd2

Lunch WIFI network: NHS Improvement WIFI password: LearningFD2 Glisser: glsr.it/lfd2

Providing leadership across the system Dr Emma Redfern Consultant in Emergency Medicine and Associate Medical Director, Patient Safety Dr Mark Callaway Consultant Radiologist University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust

LEADERSHIP EMBED LEARNING INTO QI Mark Callaway & Emma Redfern

UHB PERSPECTIVE Learning From Deaths Process started in April Built a multidisciplinary team Developed a screening process Utilised SCNR Use the Medical director team to define avoidability Developed a method of identifying learning from deaths

OPERATIONAL PROCESS FOR MORTALITY REVIEW Automatic inclusion for SJR Elective care ( inc deaths on ITU) Patients with learning difficulties Patients under Mental Health Section 16-18 year olds Family concern s Alerts from risk management group Patients subject to Coroner s Inquest Additional Random selection SCREENING PROCESS Remainder of notes screened using standardised tool and if clinical issues identified then proceed to SJR Exclusion for SJR Non elective death on ITU/CICU Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Division Themes and scores collated at Divisional level Dashboard populated Feedback to Divisional Board Inclusion in specialty M+M In some cases feedback to family Structured judgment review Including assessment of more likely than not to have resulted from problems in healthcare If care scored at 1 or 2 then second review undertaken by MD office, and consideration for clinical incident/ serious incident reporting including Duty of Candour obligation Mortality Surveillance Group Additional information from ITU/CICU,Paediatrics/ O+G Dashboard review Cross Trust themes identified and fed to QI Academy Good Practice fed back to teams from MD office Reports Quality and Outcomes Committee Coal Face teams quarterly Mortality bulletin

QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% Admission and initial Management score 1' Admission and initial Management score 2' Admission and initial Management score 3' Admission and initial Management score 4' Admission and initial Management score 5' 0.0% Medicine Spec Svs Surgery/ITU

THEMES Learning From Deaths End of life care Senior review Senior decision making

WEASHN WHY MORTALITY REVIEW? Deteriorating patient workstream Cross system NEWS ED safety checklist Ambulance EpCR

WEASHN

HOW 7 acute trusts West of England Initial introduction meeting senior leaders & RCP Training meeting with RCP 3 trusts early implementers Cascade training across the region

COLLABORATIVE MEMBERSHIP Senior clinicians from 7 trusts Patient and public representatives General Practice Mental health trust AHSN

INITIAL MEETINGS Focussed on process Scoring Time needed clinician engagement Operational process mapping

SUBSEQUENT MEETINGS Themes fed back End of life recognition of in acute trusts, pre deterioration conversations in community Escalation April 2017 July 2017 1630 deaths screened, 499 reviewed

COLLABORATION Facilitates conversations with issues between acute trusts Non hostile feedback about issues in primary care medication etc

QI Deteriorating patient NEWS, EOL recognition Treatment Escalation plan, DNACPR Pre deterioration conversation Poor prognosis letters

IN FUTURE Review deaths within 30 days of discharge involvement of primary care Cross system QI Consider Respect form

QUESTIONS/ CONTACT Mark.callaway@uhbristol.nhs.uk Emma.redfern@uhbristol.nhs.uk

Providing leadership across the system David and Aldyth Smith Family Members Diane Hull Chief Nurse Dr Rick Fraser Chief Medical Officer Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Learning From Deaths David and Aldyth Smith Diane Hull, Chief Nurse Dr Rick Fraser, Chief Medical Officer

Our Journey Our position not defending the organisation but defending what is right. Our philosophy of always involving the family. Recognising the important contribution family/carers make in the completion of investigations. Ethical responsibility to help the family/carers understand what has happened.

Focus of our work Rewritten our Serious Incident policy - family are now central to the process. Reviewed and rewritten our Root Cause Analysis Training. Reviewed all of our processes. Developed a range of ways we Learn from Deaths and share learning across the services.

Family Liaison Lead Developing a Family Liaison Lead Role

The family perspective Josephine Ocloo and David Smith Family Members Learning from Deaths Programme Board

Learning from Deaths Working with families as partners Josephine Ocloo and David Smith Family Members, Programme Board

Compassion and Living Your Values Treat people with respect, kindness, care and compassion - too many people feel they didn t have this experience at the worst time of their lives. Families should be listened to and believed; not treated as the problem. Staff should recognise that families are grieving - they need to be mindful of their language and never disparaging. Staff need to recognise that when families speak up, they re only seeking the truth - don t simply tag them as troublemakers. 91

Communication Families will only hear the news that their loved one has died once. Clarity - a need to talk in plain understandable language. Transparency, openness and honesty must underpin all communication. Timescales should be clearly agreed with families and adhered to. Need consistent and clear communication with families. Need information about how to access medical and other records. Easy infographic guides and checklists should be provided for families. 3

Independence of Investigatory Systems Too many families find themselves having to become detectives. Deaths investigated if families push needs someone else to push. Families feel they have to fight against a culture that places corporate defensiveness above a corporate concern for the truth. All investigations must be and be seen to be independent. Regulators should sign up to principles of independence and transparency and not close ranks. Be honest lost notes etc. are seen as indicators of cover ups.

Imbalance of power The power imbalance can t be underestimated. Compared to families, Trusts have significant finance and resources, including: Legal support Understanding and control of : the processes the technicalities of the system the language of clinicians and NHS speak And Trust staff have access to support - families have to find their own The playing field must be levelled. 94

Empowering families Families should be central in investigations and treated as equals. Need a person-centred approach; a sympathetic environment; and respect for patient rights. Need a right to access all key information/medical records; and funded legal advice. Need strong sanctions when medical records are lost or missing. The CQC should contact and engage with families where there s been an Serious Incident (SI).

Empowering families (continued) Families need increased levels of independent support across the process, including: Free advocacy/support and signposting to the right information A person to support them in establishing the truth Ability to request a coroner from outside the local area; or post mortem by another Trust Counselling for families A review of PALS/Family Liaison Services

Balancing Learning and Accountability Families want learning but feel they also have a right to accountability. CULTURE change is essential in moving things forward and requires strong leadership. There should be penalties and sanctions when wrongdoing occurs and rewards for learning Being human - the culture is set from the leadership of the organisation. Saying sorry is important BUT it has to be genuine. Learning within one Trust needs to be shared with others. 7

Address from The Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP Secretary of State for Health

Next steps Dr Kathy McLean Executive Medical Director and Chief Operating Officer NHS Improvement

Next steps

Personal reflections

Closing remarks Mrs Celia Ingham Clark Medical Director for Clinical Effectiveness, NHS England Interim NHS National Director of Patient Safety, NHS Improvement