HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

Similar documents
HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2014 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

Mid-East RPO - SPOT Local Input Point Assignment Methodology

High Country Rural Planning Organization (RPO) Municipalities and Counties of Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Mitchell, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey

STIP. Van Argabright November 9, 2017

Toll Project Development Policy. Mark Boggs, P.E.

Project Selection Advisory Council

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017

339 New Leicester Highway, Suite 140 Asheville. NC

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

RPO Technical Coordinating Committee February 9th, :00 A.M., Land of Sky Regional Council Agenda

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 14B 1

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Transportation Planning & Investment in Urban North Carolina

Transportation. Fiscal Research Division. March 24, Justification Review

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Fiscal Year

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

CITY OF LA CENTER PUBLIC WORKS

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM (SRTS) U. S. Department of Transportation

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

Chatham County Transportation Advisory Committee Strategic Plan

By Rmhermen at en.wikipedia (photo by rmhermen) [GFDL ( or CC-BY-SA-3.0

COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSAL

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

J o i n t T e c h n i c a l C o o r d i n a t i n g C o m m i t t e e a n d G o v e r n i n g B o a r d

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011

Unified Planning Work Program Fiscal Year 2016 (July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016)

HB2 Quick Guide To view the latest version of the HB2 Policy Guide:

AGENDA Rural Transportation Advisory Committee Tuesday, September 20 th, :00 p.m. Water Street Center, 401 East Water Street, Charlottesville

Cass County Rural Task Force Call for Projects Deadline: December 12, 2018

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

2018 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program Overview Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency

TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS

Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation. September 2016

16 th Annual National Lifespan Respite Conference October 7-8, Nashville TN Brenda Reece, Executive Director High Country Caregiver Foundation

ODOT s Planning Program Public Involvement Process

Lake Norman Regional Transportation Commission AGENDA March 8, 2017

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

Update on Federal Rail Grants to NCDOT

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

UNFUNDED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS OVERVIEW

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

J o i n t T e c h n i c a l C o o r d i n a t i n g C o m m i t t e e a n d G o v e r n i n g B o a r d

Overview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance

States Approaches to Transportation Project Prioritization

STAKEHOLDER VISIONING MEETING. November 12, 2015

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly.

Transportation Improvement Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department

Measure A Strategic Plan Update Citizens Advisory Committee July 1, 2014

Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Project Call

SILER CITY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AIRPORT PLANNING/ENGINEERING SERVICES

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Posey County Long Range Transportation Plan

FY Transportation Improvement Program

Draft MAPA FY2019-FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Uptown Main Street/US 25 Traffic Calming Analysis. Date Issued: June 5, 2018

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

Washington State Department of Transportation

Transportation Improvement Program FY

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

WINSTON-SALEM URBAN AREA MPO EXPLAINED

Overview of Planning & Programming in Minnesota

Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

VILLAGE OF FOX CROSSING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

MINUTES WINSTON-SALEM URBAN AREA TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) NOVEMBER 18, :15 P.M. FIFTH FLOOR, PUBLIC MEETING ROOM, BRYCE A

2018 Project Selection Process. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

Exhibit B. Plumas County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan SCOPE OF WORK

NCDOT Planning Summary for NCTA Projects

LPA Programs How They Work

Town of Apex U 5118 AF, Operational Improvements & Sidewalk on Kelly Road

BOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Highway Safety Improvement Program Procedures Manual

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

AASHTO s Highway Safety Manual: Quantification of Highway Safety. Priscilla Tobias, PE Illinois Department of Transportation State Safety Engineer

David Welden, Protect Cobb Ron Sifen Jill Flamm, East Cobb Civic Association Galt Porter, District 4 Planning Commission Galt Porter, Cobb Planning

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015

State of Health: Watauga County 2016 Appalachian District Health Department Promoting safe & healthy living, preventing disease & protecting the

FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

TxDOT Statewide 2017 TA Set-Aside Questions & Answers

Transportation Planning Prospectus

3. Update on the North Winchester Area Plan John Madera, NSVRC & Terry Short, VDOT

VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. FY2018 Budget. Joe Flynn, Secretary of Transportation House Appropriations Committee February 27, 2017

Unified Planning Work Program AMENDMENT

Special State Funding Programs Breakout Session #5C Funding Programs Track. October 25, 2012

FLORIDA-ALABAMA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION 2017 PEDESTRIAN BICYCLE MASTER PLAN UPDATE Scope of Work

Title VI: Public Participation Plan

Transcription:

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS Introduction The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and North Carolina General Assembly have required that all rural planning organizations develop a project solicitation and ranking process to evaluate projects for the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for highway, bicycle & pedestrian, public transportation, aviation, and rail modes of transportation. This process has been approved by the NCDOT to ensure compliance with the legislative intent of the mandate. The methodology for ranking projects will include the following steps: 1. Submittal of new projects to NCDOT 2. Solicitation of transportation project priorities from the counties in the High Country RPO region 3. Ranking of solicited projects received from High Country RPO counties for the development of a priority needs list 4. Assignment of 140 to top projects on the priority needs list Applicability This process would apply to all projects ranked by the High Country RPO in Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Mitchell, Watauga, Wilkes and Yancey counties that fall in the regional and division levels as defined in the 2013 Strategic Transportation Investments (STI) legislation and depicted in the map below. 1

Statewide mobility projects will be 100% quantitative data driven by NCDOT with no local input from the RPO or Divisions. Regional projects will be 70% quantitative data driven by NCDOT with 30% local input (15% NCDOT Division 11 or 13 and 15% RPO). Division level projects will be 50% quantitative data driven by NCDOT with 50% local input (25% NCDOT Division 11 or 13 and 25% RPO). Other factors like local government priorities will also be considered. RPO local input points are due to NCDOT by September 30, 2016. New Project Solicitation High Country RPO staff will request new projects from the seven High Country Counties and the Town of Boone, and submit them to the Strategic Prioritization Office of Transportation (SPOT) office for inclusion in the P4.0 Project list. RPO Steps Target Dates Staff to solicit new transportation projects from County Managers (highway, bicycle & pedestrian, June 8, 2015 July 8, 2015 public transportation, aviation, and rail modes) New projects scheduled for RTCC consideration and recommendation of approval to RTAC August 19, 2015 New projects scheduled for consideration and approval by the RTAC August 19, 2015 RPO staff submittal of approved RTCC/RTAC new projects to NCDOT for project evaluation and scoring. October 19, 2015 November 20, 2015 Public Input Process Public input for the STIP prioritization process shall be in accordance with the High Country RPO Public Participation Plan. The scoring and ranking methodology will be shared with the public through press releases and posting on the High Country RPO website at http://www.regiond.org/transport.html and will consider any public input into the ranking. The RPO will issue a press release regarding the adoption of the Priority Needs list and provide for public comment at applicable RTCC and RTAC meetings. The prioritization of projects from the Priority Needs list will be accomplished at applicable RTCC and RTAC meetings and will include a public hearing component. The results of prioritizing the Priority Needs list and associated public comments received will be posted on the High Country RPO website at http://www.regiond.org/transport.html. In addition, any comments received during a public hearing held by the High Country RPO s RTCC or RTAC will be included in the meeting minutes and included as appendices in formal documents for which they were made. The final assignment of points by the RPO will also be available via the High Country RPO s website. 2

Solicitation of Projects for Ranking High Country RPO staff will request 30 projects (highway, bicycle & pedestrian, public transportation, aviation, and rail modes of transportation) from the seven High Country counties and the Town of Boone to be ranked will be in priority order. The number of projects per county is based on population, area, and primary road mileage. The number of projects per county (and Town of Boone) is: Alleghany 3; Ashe 5; Avery 3; Mitchell 3; Watauga 4; Wilkes 7; Yancey 4; Town of Boone 1 Proposed Scoring Methodology Projects submitted will be evaluated by the criteria and scoring as detailed in the High Country RPO 2015 Project Prioritization Criteria Definitions and Scoring system identified on pages 4 7. The resulting project scores and rankings will be adopted by the RPO as the High Country RPO Priority Needs List and will serve as the basis for assignment of points to transportation projects which include all modes of transportation. Local Point Assignment Methodologies The Priority Needs List will guide in the assignment of points. After projects are prioritized, the top 14 projects receive 10 each. The top 14 projects in the Regional Impact category tier receive 100 points and the top 14 projects in the Division Needs category will receive 10. If a project is not funded at the Statewide Mobility level it will shift down to the Regional level for RPO scoring and ranking. Regional Impact Projects: Eligible Regional needs routes in the High Country RPO include parts of US 19E, US 21, US 221, and US 421 not otherwise eligible at the statewide level. In addition, all NC routes (NC 197, NC 194, NC 16, NC 18 ). The Class I railroad in Mitchell County is also an eligible regional rail line. If a project is not funded at the Regional Impact category it will shift down to the Division Needs category for RPO scoring and ranking. Division Needs Projects: Eligible Division Needs routes in the High Country RPO include all State highways and all other modes of transportation (bicycle/pedestrian, remaining rail, airport, and transit projects). 3

Schedule RPO Steps The High Country RPO staff to submit the updated 4.0 draft methodology for ranking and scoring of projects to NCDOT for review and approval. Draft methodology available for public comment through press releases and the posting of the document on the High Country RPO website at http://www.regiond.org/transport.html Consideration and approval of methodology by RTCC & RTAC at November 18, 2015 RTCC meeting and December 16, 2015 RTAC meeting with public hearing RPO staff to solicit priority projects with a supplemental overall project scores list (after scores are released from NCDOT) from local governments for scoring and ranking RPO consideration and approval of Prioritization 4.0 Priority Needs list at RPO meetings with public hearing Target Dates September 2015 October 2015 October 15, 2015 November 15, 2015 November 18, 2015 and December 16, 2015 April 2016 May 18, 2016 RPO assigns 10 to top 14 ranking regional projects May 2016 RPO assigns 10 to top 14 ranking division projects August 2016 All public comments received and all final point assignments including any justification for point assignment which deviates from this local methodology will be placed on the High Country RPO website at http://www.regiond.org/transport.html by the end of August 2016 August 2016 4

HIGH COUNTRY RPO 2015 Project Prioritization Criteria Definitions and Scoring Highway Volume to Capacity Current Average Daily Traffic (ADT) count as ratio to road's capacity based on most recent ADT rates and road capacity figures available from NCDOT Greater than or equal to 1.5 1.0 1.49 1.5.99 <.5 Crash Incidence Measure of total crashes from NCDOT s most recent three years prioritization crash data. 150 + 100 149 12 points 50 99 9 points 25 49 6 points 0 24 3 points Upgrade Existing Facility Improves currently deficient roadway to meet minimum NCDOT standards Yes No CTP or Thoroughfare Plan Consistency The project is identified in an adopted Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) or Thoroughfare Plan Yes No 1 5

Project Status The project is in one or more of the following stages of development: Funded in STIP (programmed in years 6 10 of the STIP), Allocation of Preliminary Engineering (PE) Funds, Final Environmental Documents completed. Projects will receive these points based on the most advanced stage of project development listed below. None Funded (TIP) PE Funds Environmental Documents 3 points 8 points 1 Connectivity Project is part of larger system improvement project is a coordinated phase of a proposed/scheduled improvement Project completes final portion of phased facility improvement Project connects to another phase of scheduled facility improvement Project is initial phase of a scheduled facility improvement Independent project 3 points 2 points Access to Community Facilities (school/hospital/emergency care/fire dept. /police dept. /employment destinations (more than 100 employees)) Project connects to educational, health care, emergency service, or employment facilities Direct access Indirect access No access (driveway connects to project) 3 points (within 1 mile) (greater than 1 mile) Truck Traffic Average daily number of large freight movers (tractor trailers, etc) on a road. 0 200 1 point 201 400 2 points 401 800 3points 801 1000 4 points 1001 + 2 1 6

Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Project provides access to school, medical center, shopping center, residential development, or major employment center (100+ employees) Directs access Indirect access (within 0.25 mile) Greater than 0.25 mile 1 Connectivity Project provides connection to existing bike or pedestrian facility Yes No Safety Project attempts to improve safety receives points (receive points score all that apply) 1 or more bicycle or pedestrian crashes along corridor during last 5 available years 1 Project is separated from roadway by at least 5 feet 1 Posted speed limit on roadway is greater than 35 mph 1 Plan Consistency Project is identified in an adopted CTP, bicycle, pedestrian, or greenway plan Yes No 2 2 1 7

Aviation Aviation projects will be scored as follows: The NCDOT s Division of Aviation s raw score (50 point scale) X 1.6 + score. 2 1 Transit Public Transit projects will be scored as follows: The NCDOT s Division of Public Transit s raw score (50 point scale) X 1.6 + score 2 1 8

Rail Rail projects will be scored as follows: The NCDOT s Division of Rail raw score (50 point scale) X 1.6 + score 2 1 RURAL TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (RTAC) FLEXABILITY The methodology shall serve as a guide for the RTAC to assign points to projects located within the High Country RPO planning jurisdiction and the RTAC will have the flexibility to assign points as the committee desires. However, deviation from the methodology shall require justification/rationale to be made during a public meeting of the RTAC as advertised. 9