DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE UNITED STATES Annual Report

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE UNITED STATES 206 Aual Report

REAR ADMIRAL PAUL F. THOMAS Assistat Commadat for Prevetio Policy Uited States Coast Guard I am pleased to preset to you the 206 Aual Report o Port State Cotrol (PSC) for the Uited States. This aual report marks the eighteeth issue ad details the statistics related to eforcemet of the regulatios uder the Iteratioal Covetio for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), the Iteratioal Covetio for the Prevetio of Pollutio from Ships (MARPOL), ad the Iteratioal Ship & Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code o foreig flagged vessels tradig i U.S. ports. For 206, our PSC activity icreased by 25 safety exams over our 205 totals. Though our exam totals icreased, I am pleased to report that we saw our detetio total decrease sigificatly from 202 to 03, our lowest total i five years. Our three-year rollig average detetio ratio that was o the rise over the last two years has made a slight drop from.67% to.63%. Though the drop i detetios is ecouragig overall ad may be a sig that owers ad operators are puttig greater emphasis o ship maiteace, we are seeig a rise i the percetage of detetios related to fire fightig ad fire protectio systems for the third straight year. As i 205, there were a high umber of detetios issued due to Port State Cotrol Officers (PSCOs) idetifyig quick closig fuel shutoff valves o fuel oil taks blocked i the ope positio. Additioally, there were detetios issued for ioperable mai fire pumps ad istaces where maual valves o hyper-mist systems located i uatteded machiery spaces were discovered i the closed positio, rederig the system ioperative. I am also pleased to report that our MARPOL Aex I deficiecies have bee o the declie over the past several years, ad I hope that vessel owers ad operators remai committed to meetig evirometal compliace stadards. However, despite the umerous detetios, civil pealties, ad eve crimial prosecutio actios i the most egregious cases, we cotiue to fid istaces where ships crews flagratly disregard MARPOL Aex I requiremets. Whe a OWS is discovered to be itetioally bypassed or whe PSCOs are preseted with a false record book or give a false statemet durig a PSC examiatio, the Uited States will cotiue to eforce our laws ad treaty obligatios, as well as pursue available domestic eforcemet optios, whether civil or crimial. For those exemplary vessels that have cosistetly adhered to evirometal compliace while also demostratig a immese commitmet to evirometal stewardship, the Coast Guard is expadig upo our QUALSHIP 2 (QS2) program to recogize them. The expaded program, called QUALSHIP 2 E-Zero, is based o strict evirometal compliace criteria ad provides additioal beefits to those ships that are able to qualify. Full details o this ew expaded QS2 program, icludig eligibility requiremets, are preseted later i this report. O a persoal ote, this report will be my last as the Assistat Commadat for Prevetio Policy. Later this summer I will assume duties as the Commader, Coast Guard Eighth District i New Orleas, Louisiaa. As I embark o my ext assigmet, I am pleased to commed the work of my Headquarters staffs, the Captais of the Port, ad most otably the dedicated work of the Coast Guard s PSCOs. Through their hard work ad dedicatio, they cotiue to make our PSC program oe of the fiest i the world. I hope you fid this report a useful resource. Ay questios, commets or recommedatios you may have o this report should be directed to my staff whose poits of cotact are listed at the ed. ii

Table of Cotets Chapter - Port State Cotrol Overview Highlights i 206 206 Port State Cotrol Statistics by Regio 2 206 Port State Cotrol Statistics by Port 3 Flag Admiistratio Safety ad Security Performace 4 Port State Cotrol Appeal Process 5 Chapter 2 - Safety Compliace Performace Port State Cotrol Safety ad Evirometal Protectio Compliace Targetig Matrix 206 Flag Admiistratio Safety Compliace Performace 7 206 Flag Admiistratio Safety Compliace Performace Statistics 8 206 Recogized Orgaizatio Safety Compliace Performace Detaiable Deficiecies Overview 2 Statistics Derived from USCG Port State Cotrol Examiatios 3 Quality Shippig for the 2st Cetury (QUALSHIP 2) 5 QUALSHIP 2 E-Zero Program 7 Chapter 3 - Security Compliace Performace ISPS/MTSA Security Compliace Targetig Matrix 2 206 Flag Admiistratio Security Compliace Performace 22 206 Flag Admiistratio Security Compliace Performace Statistics 23 Security Deficiecies by Category & Major Cotrol Actios by Vessel Graphs U.S. Coast Guard Uit Spotlight 27 Uited States Port State Cotrol Cotact Iformatio 28 6 26 O the Frot Cover LT Adam Paz, a port state cotrol officer from Coast Guard Sector Puget Soud, examies the iterior of a free-fall lifeboat as part of a port state cotrol safety examiatio. iii

Chapter Port State Cotrol Overview Highlights i 206 Vessel Arrivals ad Examiatios Icreased, Detetios Decreased I 206, a total of 9,859 idividual vessels, from 83 differet flag admiistratios, made 8,877 port calls to the Uited States. The Coast Guard coducted 9,390 SOLAS safety exams ad 8,88 ISPS exams o these vessels. The total umber of ships detaied i 206 for evirometal protectio ad safety related deficiecies decreased from 202 to 03. The total umber of ships detaied i 206 for security related deficiecies slightly decreased from to 8. Flag Admiistratio Safety ad Security Performace Flag admiistratio safety performace for 206 icreased, with the overall aual detetio rate droppig from 2.8% to.09%. The three-year rollig detetio ratio also decreased from.67% to.63%. The flag admiistratios of Hoduras ad Malta were both removed from our Targeted Flag List. Flag admiistratio security performace for 206 icreased as well, with the aual Cotrol Actio Ratio (CAR) decreasig from 0.3% to 0.09%. The three-year rollig average CAR has remaied steady at 0.%. Additioally, the flag admiistratios of Egypt, Hoduras, ad Tazaia were all removed from our ISPS/MTSA targeted matrix. Detetio Appeals I additio to receivig appeals cotestig the overall merits of a detetio, we also receive appeals requestig the removal of a party s associatio to a detetio. I 206, Coast Guard Headquarters received a total of 3 detetio appeals. Four appeals were submitted challegig the overall merits of the detetio. All four were deied. For those parties appealig their associatio with a detetio, ie total, all ie were grated. For more iformatio o the Coast Guard s appeal process, please see our process guidace o page 5 of this report. QUALSHIP 2 Program The QUALSHIP 2 program eded caledar year 206 with a erollmet of,493 vessels. Last year we had thirtee flag admiistratios lose their QS2 eligibility over the previous year. With the cosiderable drop i detetios, oly oe flag admiistratio lost their eligibility ad a additioal six became eligible. We would like to welcome the flag admiistratios of Bahamas, Chia, Germay, Isle of Ma, Portugal, ad Sigapore for becomig QS2 eligible i 207. We ivite you to take a momet to see the full list of QS2 flag admiistratios i Chapter 2 of this report. QUALSHIP 2 E-Zero Program (New for 207) The Coast Guard is itroducig QS2 E-Zero, a ew program that icorporates evirometal stewardship ito the existig QS2 program. The QS2 E-Zero program focuses o compliace with iteratioal evirometal covetios ad U.S. ballast water regulatios. The E-zero desigatio is iteded to provide a higher level of recogitio withi the existig QS2 program. Details o the beefits of the ew QS2 E-Zero program, icludig eligibility requiremets, are preseted i Chapter 2 of this report. Process wise, all existig QUALSHIP 2 ships that are comig due for reewal i the comig moths will be automatically screeed for eligibility based o reewals fallig withi the period of July, 207 to December, 207. For all other QUALSHIP 2 ships which presetly meet the E- Zero criteria, shippig compaies are welcome to submit applicatios i order to have the E-Zero desigatio added to their vessels curret certificates for reissuace.

Port State Cotrol Overview Chapter 206 Port State Cotrol Statistics By Regio Pacific Area Atlatic Area st 9th 5th 7th 4th District Ship Visits Safety Examiatios Coducted Safety Detetios Security Examiatios Coducted Security Major Cotrol Actios st 5th 7th 8th 9th th 3th 4th 7th Total 7,333,0 0 948 0 7,696 85 9 873 0 24,39,646 27,365 24,337 3,405 42 3,35 7 2,462 73 0 69 0 8,627,003 9 957 0 4,353 903 0 868 0,502 255 6 203 0,428 43 0 20 0 8,877 9,390 03 8,88 8 O the followig pages, please fid tables ad graphs depictig PSC statistics by regio ad port, ad Flag Admiistratio safety ad security performace. 2

Chapter Port State Cotrol Overview 206 Port State Cotrol Statistics by Port Coast Guard Officer i Charge of Marie Ispectio/Port Coast Guard District Safety Examiatios Detetios Security Examiatios Major Cotrol Actios Sector Achorage 7 04 0 95 0 Sector Bosto 92 0 77 0 Sector Buffalo 9 43 0 94 0 Sector Charlesto 7 28 0 36 0 Sector Columbia River 3 53 2 527 0 Sector Corpus Christi 8 260 2 254 0 Sector Delaware Bay 5 369 4 372 0 Sector Detroit 9 54 0 26 0 Marie Safety Uit Duluth 9 39 0 29 0 Sector Guam 4 84 0 6 0 Sector Hampto Roads 5 82 0 84 0 Sector Hoolulu 4 7 6 42 0 Sector Housto/Galvesto 8,4 9,080 2 Sector Jacksoville 7 233 4 24 Sector Jueau 7 39 0 25 0 Sector Key West 7 9 0 0 Sector Lake Michiga 9 30 0 20 0 Sector Log Islad Soud 52 0 43 0 Sector Los Ageles/Log Beach 64 4 642 0 Sector Marylad-NCR 5 222 5 232 0 Sector Miami 7 47 345 0 Sector Mobile 8 320 4 3 Marie Safety Uit Morga City 8 49 0 4 0 Sector New Orleas 8,23 2,208 3 Sector New York 679 0 694 0 Sector North Carolia 5 78 0 85 0 Sector Norther New Eglad 64 0 52 0 Marie Safety Uit Port Arthur 8 33 6 32 Sector Puget Soud 3 390 8 34 0 Sector Sa Diego 08 75 0 Sector Sa Fracisco 254 4 240 0 Sector Sa Jua 7 488 9 39 0 Sector Sault Ste Marie 9 7 0 0 0 Marie Safety Uit Savaah 7 20 2 98 0 Sector Southeaster New Eglad 24 0 82 0 Sector St. Petersburg 7 70 52 0 Note: Due to the orgaizatio of Coast Guard field uits ito Sectors ad Marie Safety Uits, ports listed above reflect Coast Guard Captai of the Port (COTP) ad Officer i Charge of Marie Ispectio (OCMI) zoes. 3

The followig defiitios apply to the table below: Port State Cotrol Overview Chapter Flag Admiistratio Safety ad Security Performace Safety-Related Detetio: U.S. itervetio o a foreig vessel whe its operatioal coditio or crew do ot substatially meet applicable iteratioal covetios to esure the vessel will ot proceed to sea without presetig a dager to the vessel, its crew, the port, or cause harm to the marie eviromet. Aual Detetio Ratio: The yearly sum of safety-related detetios divided by the yearly sum of port state cotrol examiatios, multiplied by oe hudred. Three-Year Average Detetio Ratio: The cumulative sum of safety related detetios from Jauary 204 through December 206 divided by the cumulative sum of port state cotrol examiatios durig those three years, multiplied by oe hudred. ISPS Major Cotrol Actio: A cotrol measure (e.g., detetio, deial of etry, or expulsio) imposed by the U.S. o a foreig vessel whe clear grouds exist idicatig that a ship is ot i compliace with the requiremets of SOLAS Chapter XI or part A of the ISPS Code. Aual ISPS Cotrol Actio Ratio (CAR): The yearly sum of ISPS major cotrol actios divided by the yearly sum of ISPS compliace examiatios, multiplied by oe hudred. Average ISPS Cotrol Actio Ratio (CAR): The average of the Aual ISPS Cotrol Actio Ratio data from Jauary 204 to December 206. Caledar Year Safety Related Detetios Aual Detetio Ratio 3-Year Average Detetio Ratio Major ISPS Cotrol Actios Aual ISPS Cotrol Actio Ratio 2004 76 2.43% 2.30% 92.5% (2) Rollig Average ISPS Cotrol Actio Ratio () 2005 27.6% 2.00% 5 0.65% 0.89% 2006 0.35%.78% 35 0.43% 0.80% 2007 52.82%.60% 42 0.5% 0.53% 2008 76 2.03%.75% 27 0.3% 0.4% 2009 6.88%.92% 8 0.2% 0.34% 200 56.67%.86% 7 0.8% 0.23% 20 97.04%.53% 5 0.6% 0.8% 202 05.7%.30% 8 0.09% 0.4% 203 2.29%.% 8 0.09% 0.2% 204 43.55%.3% 0 0.2% 0.0% 205 202 2.8%.67% 0.3% 0.% 206 03.09%.63% 8 0.09% 0.% Targetig thresholds for vessel security was fixed at.5% i 2005 ad has remaied fixed sice that time. 2 Average based upo 6,093 distict arrivals from July, 2004 - December 3, 2004. 4

Chapter Port State Cotrol Overview Port State Cotrol Appeal Process Ay directly-affected party wishig to dispute the validity of, or their associatio with, a detetio should follow the appeal procedures outlied i Title 46, Code of Federal Regulatios, Subpart.03. The appeal process allows for three separate levels of appeal startig with the Sector, District, ad fially Headquarters. At each level, the appellat has a opportuity to raise ew reasos, facts or additioal iformatio as to why the appeal should be grated. Coast Guard officials resposible for the review ad determiatio of a appeal remai objective to both the Coast Guard s ad idustry positio. We value the role of the appeal process i the overall health of our Port State Cotrol program, ad emphasize that there will be o repercussios to the appellat for seekig recosideratio or requestig to appeal. For Recogized Orgaizatio (RO) Related Detetios Appeals from ROs must be submitted withi 30 days of detetio otificatio or a formal request for a extesio to this deadlie must be submitted to CG-CVC-2. All appeals shall be i writte format, cotai mitigatig iformatio ad be submitted electroically via e-mail to the followig address: PortStateCotrol@uscg.mil Appeals may also be submitted to the followig postal address: Commadat (CG-CVC-2) Att: Office of Commercial Vessel Compliace U.S. Coast Guard STOP 750 2703 Marti Luther Kig Jr Ave S.E. Washigto, D.C. 20593-750 For All Other Detetios All other operatioal cotrols (i.e., those ot RO related) should be appealed first to the cogizat Captai of the Port (COTP) or Officer i Charge of Marie Ispectio (OCMI) who issued the detetio. If ot satisfied with a COTP/OCMI decisio o a appeal, a request for recosideratio of the appeal may be forwarded to the District Commader. Coast Guard COTP/OCMI ad District postal addresses ca be foud o the followig website: https://homeport.uscg.mil/mycg/portal/ep/home.do?tabid= If still ot satisfied, fial cosideratio of the appeal ca be forwarded to the Commadat of the Coast Guard, Office of Commercial Vessel Compliace (CG-CVC). Commadat is the fial agecy actio for appeals ad will cosider ay additioal evidece ot cotaied i the origial appeal. 5

Safety Compliace Performace Chapter 2 Port State Cotrol Safety ad Evirometal Protectio Compliace Targetig Matrix I II III IV V SHIP MANAGEMENT FLAG STATE RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATIONS VESSEL HISTORY SHIP PARTICULARS (SEE NOTE) 5 POINTS Listed Ower, Operator, or Charterer 7 POINTS Flag State has a detetio ratio 2 or more times the overall average for all flag states. 2 POINTS Flag State has a detetio ratio betwee the overall average ad up to 2 times the overall average for all flag states PRIORITY I Detetio ratio equal to or greater tha 2% 5 POINTS Detetio ratio less tha 2% but greater tha or equal to % 3 POINTS Detetio ratio less tha % but greater tha.5% NO POINTS Detetio ratio less tha.5% PRIORITY II First time to U.S. or o port State cotrol exam i the previous 2 moths 5 POINTS EACH Detetio, deial of etry, or expulsio i the previous 2 moths POINT EACH COTP restricted the operatios of the vessel for safety related issues i the previous 2 moths (icludig LODs) 4 POINTS Geeral Cargo Ship Ro-Ro Cargo Ship Vehicle Carrier Passeger Ship ivolved i day trips or ferry service 2 POINTS Bulk Carrier Refrigerated Cargo POINT Oil or Chemical Taker SHIP AGE (USE DELIVERY DATE) POINT EACH Reportable marie casualty i the previous 2 moths POINT EACH Marie violatio i the previous 2 moths Total Targetig Score (Sum of Colums I-V) determies vessels priority (PI, PII, or NPV) 0-4 years - subtract 3 5-9 years - subtract 2 0-4 years - add 0 5-9 years - add 3 20-24 years - add 5 25+ years - add 7 Note: For Qualship 2 vessels oly; poits should ot be added i this colum, but poits ca be subtracted for Priority (P)I Vessel 7 or more poits o the Matrix; ships ivolved i a marie casualty that may have affected seaworthiess; USCG Captai of the Port (COTP) determies a vessel to be a potetial hazard to the port or the eviromet; ships whose Recogized Orgaizatio (classificatio society) has a detetio ratio equal to or greater tha 2%. Port etry may be restricted util the Coast Guard examies the vessel. Priority (P)II Vessel 7 to 6 poits o the Matrix; outstadig requiremets from a previous examiatio i this or aother U.S. port that require clearig; the vessel has ot bee examied withi the past 2 moths per colum IV. Cargo operatios or passeger embarkatio/debarkatio may oly be restricted if the Sector Commader/COTP determies that the vessel poses a safety or evirometal risk to the port. No-Priority Vessel (NPV) 6 or fewer poits o the Matrix. Vessel poses a low safety ad evirometal risk. The Coast Guard may select ad examie vessel usig the Port State Cotrol radom selectio process. Dowgrade Clause: If a vessel has scored either a PI or PII ad has had a USCG PSC examiatio withi the past 6 moths with o serious deficiecies, the Sector Commader may dowgrade the vessel to NPV. If the Sector Commader dowgrades a vessel, it will be added to the pool of radom examiatios. 6

Chapter 2 Safety Compliace Performace Flag Admiistratio Safety Compliace Performace The tables below cotai Admiistratios that are o the PSC Safety Targetig Matrix effective July, 207 - Jue 30, 208 The Coast Guard targets Flag Admiistratios for additioal PSC examiatios if their detetio ratio scores higher tha.63% ad if a Admiistratio is associated with more tha oe detetio i the past three years. This is represeted i Colum II of the PSC Safety Targetig Matrix o the previous page. We calculate detetio ratios usig three years of PSC data (204-206) based o the total umber of detetios divided by the total umber of examiatios durig that period. Flags with oly oe detetio i the past three years are removed from the targeted flag list. The overall Flag Admiistratio performace has rise slightly with the three-year ruig detetio ratio decreasig slightly from.67% to.63%.. Flag Admiistratios Receivig 7 poits i Colum II of the PSC Safety Targetig Matrix 204-206 Detetio Ratio Barbados (*) 4.26% Belize 8.8% Bolivia 24.53% Idia (*) 4.35% Sait Vicet ad the Greadies 6.97% Samoa 9.09% Taiwa 24.00% Tazaia 0.4% Thailad 4.08% Vauatu 4.9% Flag Admiistratios Receivig 2 poits i Colum II of the PSC Safety Targetig Matrix 204-206 Detetio Ratio Atigua ad Barbuda 2.74% Cyprus 2.82% Greece 2.9% Paama 2.3% Turkey 3.6% Flag Admiistratios Removed From Last Year s Targeted List Number of Detetios (204-206) 204-206 Detetio Ratio Hoduras 8.33% Malta 23.55% * Admiistratio ot targeted last year. 7

Safety Compliace Performace Chapter 2 Flag () 206 Flag Admiistratio Safety Compliace Performace Statistics Safety Exams Safety Exams with Deficiecies Distict Arrivals Safety Detetios 204-206 Detetio Ratio Algeria 0 2 0 0.00% Aguilla 2 2 0 0.00% Atigua ad Barbuda 285 2 280 3 2.74% Bahamas, The 609 57 584 2 0.82% Bahrai 0 0 2 0 0.00% Bagladesh 0 0 0 0 0.00% Barbados 2 3 6 4.26% Belgium 2 4 22 0 0.00% Belize 0 2 0 8.8% Bermuda 00 29 70 0.36% Bolivia 9 6 8 0 24.53% British Virgi Islads 2 9 0 0.00% Bulgaria 0 0 0 0 0.00% Caada 27 24 23 0.27% Cayma Islads 26 33 254 0 0.00% Chile 8 4 5 0.93% Chia 49 0 6 0 0.93% Colombia 0 0 0 0 0.00% Comoros 0 0 0 0 0.00% Cook Islads 3 6 8 0 0.00% Croatia 4 6 5 0 2.50% Curacao 8 3 2 0.75% Cyprus 242 60 234 4 2.82% Demark 82 2 88 0 0.37% Domiica 3 2 2 0 0.00% Ecuador 0 0 0 0 0.00% Egypt 0 0 0 0 33.33% Filad 5 3 0 0.00% Frace 25 9 24 0.43% Germay 65 2 7 0 0.84% Gibraltar 33 8 36 0 0.87% Greece 234 55 27 2 2.9% Guyaa 0 0 0 0 0.00% Hoduras 3 2 0 8.33% If a Admiistratio has o distict arrivals to the Uited States for three cosecutive years, that Admiistratio may ot be listed. 8

Chapter 2 Safety Compliace Performace Flag () 206 Flag Admiistratio Safety Compliace Performace Statistics (cot.) Safety Exams Safety Exams with Deficiecies Distict Arrivals Safety Detetios If a Admiistratio has o distict arrivals to the Uited States for three cosecutive years, that Admiistratio may ot be listed. 204-206 Detetio Ratio Hog Kog 630 2 770 2 0.75% Idia 5 4 7 4.35% Idoesia 0 0 0 0 0.00% Irelad 0 0 0 0.00% Isle Of Ma 8 2 39 0 0.76% Israel 6 2 5 0 5.26% Italy 83 29 82 2.39% Jamaica 3 2 6 0 0.00% Japa 62 4 89 0 0.55% Kiribati 0 0 0 0.00% Kuwait 0 0 0.00% Latvia 0 0 0.00% Lebao 0 0 0 0 25.00% Liberia,05 280,4 9.47% Libya 4 5 0 0.00% Lithuaia 0 0 0 0 0.00% Luxembourg 9 3 0 0 0.00% Malaysia 7 0 8 0 0.00% Malta 546 60 559 8.55% Marshall Islads,224 288,34 9 0.98% Mexico 28 0 26 0 0.00% Moldova 5 4 2 0 0.00% Netherlads 64 63 77 2.23% New Zealad 0 2 0 0.00% Nigeria 3 0 3 0 0.00% Norway 209 45 27 3.44% Pakista 0 0.00% Palau 2 0 0.00% Paama,708 456,808 32 2.3% Peru 0 0 0 0 0.00% Philippies 47 4 53 0.85% Polad 0 0 0 0 0.00% Portugal 99 26 9 0.00% Qatar 3 0 5 0 7.69% 9

Safety Compliace Performace Chapter 2 Flag () 206 Flag Admiistratio Safety Compliace Performace Statistics (cot.) Safety Exams Safety Exams with Deficiecies Distict Arrivals Safety Detetios If a Admiistratio has o distict arrivals to the Uited States for three cosecutive years, that Admiistratio may ot be listed. 204-206 Detetio Ratio Republic Of Korea 32 0 34.00% Russia Federatio 3 6 0 0.00% Sait Kitts ad Nevis 8 2 3 0 6.25% Sait Vicet ad the Greadies 68 24 3 3 6.97% Samoa 7 3 2 9.09% Saudi Arabia 6 6 20 0.69% Seychelles 2 0 2 0 0.00% Sigapore 682 66 706 5.04% Spai 2 2 9 0 0.00% Sri Laka 3 3 0 6.67% Swede 0 7 0 2.33% Switzerlad 7 6 23 0 0.00% Taiwa 5 9 0 24.00% Tazaia 27 5 6 3 0.4% Thailad 5 7 9 0 4.08% Togo 25 5 2 2 3.03% Toga 0 0 0 0 0.00% Triidad Ad Tobago 0 0 0 0 0.00% Turkey 3 3 29 3.6% Tuvalu 0 0.00% Uited Arab Emirates 2 0 3 0 0.00% Uited Kigdom 89 6 7 0 0.00% Uruguay 0 0.00% Vauatu 68 23 52 4 4.9% Veezuela 3 2 0 7.69% Vietam 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0

Chapter 2 Safety Compliace Performace 206 Recogized Orgaizatio Safety Compliace Performace The followig guidelies explai poit assigmet (Colum III of Targetig Matrix) as they relate to detetio ratios: A detetio ratio less tha 0.5% 0 poits A detetio ratio equal to 0.5% or less tha % 3 poits A detetio ratio equal to % or less tha 2% 5 poits A detetio ratio equal to or greater tha 2% Priority Vessel Examiatios RO-Related Detetios Recogized Orgaizatio (RO) Abbreviatio 204 205 206 Total 204 205 206 Total Ratio America Bureau of Shippig ABS,603,677,836 5,6 - - - 0 0.00% Bulgaria Register of Shippig BKR - 3 6 9 - - - 0 0.00% Bureau Veritas BV,30,038,3 3,46 2-3 0.08% Chia Classificatio Society CCS 280 234 23 745 - - - 0 0.00% CR Classificatio Society CR 6 2 9 - - - 0 0.00% Croatia Register of Shippig CRS 37 7 7 7 - - - 0 0.00% Det Norske Veritas/Germaischer Lloyd DNV GL 3,622 2,687 2,22 8,43 2-3 0.04% Dromo Bureau ofshippig DBS - - - - - - - 0 0.00% Helleic Register of Shippig HRS 2 - - 2 - - - 0 0.00% Horizo Iteratioal Naval Survey ad HNS 4 2 7 - - - 0 0.00% Ispectio Bureau Idia Register of Shippig IRS 2 3 3 38 - - - 0 0.00% Iteratioal Naval Surveys Bureau INSB 8 8 6 22 - - - 0 0.00% Isthmus Bureau of Shippig IBS 8 2 3 - - - 0 0.00% Korea Register of Shippig KRS 293 287 242 822 - - - 0 0.00% Lloyd's Register LR 2,30 2,43 2,403 6,856 - - - 0 0.00% Nippo Kaiji Kyokai NKK 2,590 2,203 2,296 7,089 - - - 0 0.00% Paama Bureau of Shippig PBS 4 3 4 - - - 0 0.00% Paama Maritime Surveyors Bureau PMS 5-3 8 - - - 0 0.00% Polski Rejestr Statkow PRS 4 22 7 53 - - - 0 0.00% Registro Italiao Navale RINA 387 355 284,026 - - 0.0% Riava Portuguesa RP 2 7 4 33 - - - 0 0.00% Russia Maritime Register of Shippig RS 47 43 34 24 - - - 0 0.00% Uiversal Shippig Bureau USB 0 2 3 - - - 0 0.00% VG Register of Shippig VGRS 6 2 9 - - - 0 0.00% Paama Maritime Documetatio Service PMDS 95 5 3 4-3 4 2.83% Natioal Shippig Adjusters Ic NASHA 20 9 40 - - 2.50% Compaia Nacioal de Registro y Ispeccioes de Naves CNRIN 2-2 24 3 2 6 25.00% Itermaritime Certificatio Services IMC 47 0 2 69 3-4 5.79% Iteratioal Register of Shippig IROS 9 4 4 7 - - 5.88% Macosar Corporatio MC - 2-2 00.00% Paama Register Corporatio PRC 3 2 3 8 - - 2.50% Paama Shippig Registrar PSR 5-6 - - 6.66%

Safety Compliace Performace Chapter 2 Detaiable Deficiecies Overview* I 206, we witessed a substatial decrease i the umber of detetios from 205. This is a positive developmet; however, some commo themes repeated this year for detaiable deficiecies foud durig PSC examiatios. Fire Fightig ad Protectio Systems: Though ot as prevalet as last year, our PSCOs still cotiued to discover fire safety issues as the most commo area for detaiable deficiecies. Oce agai, there were a sigificat umber of required remoteoperable fuel shutoff valves o various fuel ad lube oil taks disabled i the ope positio, which could ot be operated from outside the space i the evet of a fire. Additioally, our PSCOs still fid fire dampers ioperable ad fire hoses that are damaged or dry rotted. Safety Maagemet Systems (SMS): The umber of SMS related deficiecies has remaied fairly cosistet over the last two years. I may cases, multiple ucorrected material deficiecies were oted, idicatig failures i the implemetatio of the vessel s SMS. Several SMS related detetios oted that the vessel ad compay were ot followig shipboard ad SMS procedures for the upkeep of critical lifesavig equipmet, icludig the maiteace of lifeboat egies ad expired SART batteries. Lifesavig Equipmet: PSCOs cotiue to observe lifesavig equipmet i a uacceptable state of readiess. There were istaces where steerig systems o lifeboats were discovered ioperable, wiches for lauchig lifesavig appliaces o davits foud froze, ad hydrostatic releases ad paiters o float-free life rafts were icorrectly istalled. MARPOL Aex I: MARPOL Aex I deficiecies have decreased steadily over the last five years. Historically, these types of deficiecies made up early oe quarter of all deficiecies issued aually, for 206 they made up oly 7%. Ioperable oily water separatig (OWS) equipmet remais the most commo detetio deficiecies uder this category. Safety i Geeral: This topic ca cover almost ay area throughout a ship ad if ot addressed immediately ca lead to serious ijury or loss of life. Durig oe exam PSCOs discovered a ioperable vetilatio fa leadig to low oxyge atmospheric coditios i the vessel s steerig gear room. Aother ship was observed to have excessive wor achor chai dogs ad a failed hydraulic power system o the mai deck due to failed seals. *This overview highlights oly a small fractio of the detaiable deficiecies discovered i 206. The Coast Guard stresses that if ay ship s system required by iteratioal covetios is ot i workig coditio, the master ad crew should take ecessary actios to remedy the situatio i accordace with their SMS before the ship eters port ad report ay uresolved issues o their advace otice of arrival. 2

Chapter 2 Safety Compliace Performace Statistics Derived from USCG Port State Cotrol Examiatios Types of Safety Deficiecies Leadig to Detetios Fire Fightig Appliaces 27% ISM Related Def iciecies Lif e Savig Appliaces 6% 5% All Other Safety i Geeral 9% 9% MARPOL, Aex I Propulsio ad Auxiliary Machiery SOLAS Operatioal Def iciecies Load Lies 7% 6% 6% 4% Crew 2% 0% 5% 0% 5% 20% 25% 30% 3

Chapter 2 Safety Compliace Performace Statistics Derived from USCG Port State Cotrol Examiatios Detetios by Ship Type 40 37 35 30 30 25 20 5 0 0 5 5 4 3 2 0 Detetio Percetage by Ship Type Ship Type Number of Exams Number of Detetios Detetio % Geeral Dry Cargo,302 30 2.30% Refrigerated Cargo 53 2.3% Bulk Carrier 3,086 37.20 Gas Carrier 353 4.3% Oil Taker,20 0 0.89% Cotaier Ship,299 0.85% Passeger Ship 373 3 0.80% Chemical Taker,204 5 0.42% Other 500 0.20% 4

Safety Compliace Performace Chapter 2 Quality Shippig for the 2 st Cetury (QUALSHIP2) The Quality Shippig for the 2 st Cetury program, or QUALSHIP 2, recogizes ad rewards vessels, as well as their owers ad Flag Admiistratios, for their commitmet to safety ad quality. To ecourage maritime etities to participate, icetives such as certificates, ame recogitio, ad a reductio i PSC examiatio frequecy are redered to participats. The criteria for iclusio are very strict ad oly a small percetage of all foreig-flagged ships that operate i the Uited States have eared the QUALSHIP 2 desigatio. The QUALSHIP 2 program eded caledar year 206 with a erollmet of,493 vessels. Oly oe previously qualified flag admiistratio lost their QUALSHIP 2 eligibility over this past year. Vessels from those flag admiistratios that are curretly erolled i the program will remai erolled util their QUALSHIP 2 certificates expire. The striget eligibility criteria for etry ito QUALSHIP 2 has remaied primarily uchaged sice the program s iceptio. The criteria ca be foud o our website. I 20, we made the decisio to amed our Flag Admiistratio qualificatio procedures to iclude the submittal of iformatio relatig to the Iteratioal Maritime Orgaizatio's Volutary Member State Audit Scheme (VMSAS). As of Jauary, 206, the oce VMSAS became madatory. If a eligible Flag Admiistratio desires to be part of the QUALSHIP 2 Program, they must submit the executive summary from their member state audit to the U.S. Coast Guard. Alteratively, if a Admiistratio has ot yet udergoe the audit, the Admiistratio should submit a letter attestig to this fact ad that they have formally requested a audit be performed. If the Admiistratio has either udergoe or requested the member state audit, they will ot be eligible. For the period of July, 207 through Jue 30, 208, we have 2 eligible Flag Admiistratios for the QUALSHIP 2 Program: Qualified Flag Admiistratios Bahamas Chia Japa Sigapore Belgium Demark Marshall Islads Switzerlad Bermuda Germay Mexico Uited Kigdom British Virgi Islads Gibraltar Philippies Caada Hog Kog Portugal Cayma Islads Isle of Ma Republic of Korea I 20, we created a list of Flag Admiistratios that have show a commitmet to excellece i their level of compliace with iteratioal stadards but do ot meet the full requiremets for QUALSHIP 2 eligibility. Specifically, they have ot met the requiremet of at least 0 PSC examiatios per caledar year for the previous three years. The list below cotais Flag Admiistratios that have had at least three PSC safety examiatios i each of the previous three years ad have ot bee subject to ay PSC detetio i that same time period: Cook Islads Jamaica Malaysia Filad Luxembourg Spai For more iformatio o the QUALSHIP 2 program, icludig a complete listig of qualifyig vessels, please refer to our website at: http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cgcvc/cvc2/psc/safety/qualship.asp O the followig page, please see the table ad graph for QUALSHIP 2 erollmet ad the umber of QUALSHIP 2 vessels by Admiistratio for 206. 5

Chapter 2 Safety Compliace Performace Quality Shippig for the 2 st Cetury (cotiued) Yearly QUALSHIP 2 Erollmet (202-206) 853 820 844 7492 8366 Number of Foreig Vessels Not Qualified Number of Foreig Vessels Erolled 066 083 433 493 480 202 203 204 205 206 Number of QUALSHIP 2 Vessels by Flag Admiistratio¹ Marshall Islads Liberia* Hog Kog Bahamas Greece* Netherlads* Norway* Cayma Islads Uited Kigdom Isle of Ma Caada Saudi Arabia* Demark Bermuda Gibraltar Belgium Chia Italy* Frace * 37 35 22 22 4 3 8 8 7 6 6 63 84 ¹ Flag Admiistratios with 5 or less vessels erolled are ot listed. * Flag Admiistratios o loger eligible but still have ships with valid QS2 certificatio. 7 6 77 74 0 50 00 50 200 250 300 350 400 450 252 409

L I S H P 2 & E - Z A Q U E R o QUALSHIP 2 & E-ZERo Rewardig Your Commitmet to Quality, Safety ad the Eviromet QUALSHIP 2 I our cotiued efforts to esure safe, secure, ad evirometally soud maritime commerce, we offer this program to reward those compaies, operators, ad vessels that demostrate the highest commitmet to quality ad safety through the highest level of compliace with Iteratioal stadards ad Uited States law ad regulatio. E-Zero (Zero Evirometal Deficiecies or Violatios) Begiig July st, 207, vessels erolled i the QUALSHIP 2 program may also seek the E-Zero desigatio if they meet the requiremets set forth below. The E-Zero program is a ew additio to the existig QUALSHIP 2 program, ad the itet of this program is to recogize those exemplary vessels that have cosistetly adhered to evirometal compliace, while also demostratig a immese commitmet to evirometal stewardship. These vessels will receive the E-Zero desigatio o their QUALSHIP 2 certificate. 7

april 207 QUALSHIP 2 & E-ZERo Rewardig Your Commitmet to Quality, Safety ad the Eviromet Preset Icetives for QUALSHIP 2 Vessels All Vessels QUALSHIP 2 erollmet valid for 3 years. Vessel ame posted o U.S. Coast Guard website & EQUASIS. Tak Vessels Certificate of Compliace (COC) aual examiatio reduced i scope. (For tak vessels, the COC aual examiatio occurs at the mid-period of the COC s two-year validity.) Freight Vessels Three years of limited Port State Cotrol (PSC) oversight. Passeger Vessels No reduced PSC examiatio, but vessel will receive QUALSHIP 2 certificate ad recogitio o the QUALSHIP 2 web page & EQUASIS. New Icetives For QUALSHIP 2/E-Zero Vessels All Vessels Special recogitio deoted o QUALSHIP 2 certificate Vessel ame posted o U.S. Coast Guard website & EQUASIS. Tak Vessels Vessel permitted to coduct cargo operatios withi six moths of both the COC aual examiatio due date ad the COC expiratio date. OCMIs must, at a miimum, must verify cargo-specific statutory documets (e.g., IOPP, Iteratioal Certificate of Fitess) ad cofirm all cargo systems are operatioal with the master prior to allowig cargo operatios. Tak vessels must still receive a full COC reewal examiatio prior to the issuace of the COC ad the vessel s departure from the Captai of the Port Zoe. Passeger Vessels Reduced scope for the evirometal portio of the examiatio durig COC periodic examiatios. 8

april 207 QUALSHIP 2 & E-ZERo Rewardig Your Commitmet to Quality, Safety ad the Eviromet Vessel Eligibility for QUALSHIP 2 For the purpose of QUALSHIP 2, the iitial eligibility criteria are: Must be a o-u.s. flagged vessel. The vessel must be registered to a QUALSHIP 2 qualified flag admiistratio. No substadard vessel detetios i the U.S. withi the previous 36 moths. No marie violatios or serious marie casualties ad o more tha oe Notice of Violatio (NOV) ticket i the U.S. withi the previous 36 moths. A successful U.S. PSC safety exam withi the previous 24 moths. Not owed or operated by ay compay (listed o vessel s Cotiuous Syopsis Record) that has bee associated with more tha oe PSC detetio i U.S. waters withi the previous 24 moths. Vessels caot have their statutory covetio certificates issued by a targeted recogized orgaizatio (RO). Targeted ROs are those that have poits assiged i the U.S. Port State Cotrol Matrix as listed i the most recet PSC Aual Report. The Coast Guard reserves the right to restrict eligibility i the QUALSHIP 2 program to ay vessel because of special circumstaces. This icludes but is ot limited to sigificat overseas casualties or detetios ad pedig crimial or civil ivestigatios. Vessel Eligibility for E-Zero desigatio Must be a vessel erolled i QUALSHIP 2, maitai certificatio for the past three years ad remai eligible for reerollmet. Zero worldwide MARPOL detetios for the vessel i the past three (3) years. Zero evirometal deficiecies (MARPOL, 33 CFR Subchapter O, Ballast Water Maagemet, Vessel Geeral Permit, Atifoulig) i the U.S. over the past three (3) years. Zero Letters of Warig, Notices of Violatio or Civil Pealties related to Right Whale Madatory Ship Reportig or speed restrictio violatios over the past 5 (five) years. Istalled CG type-approved Ballast Water Maagemet (BWM) system or operatig without a BWM compliace date extesio letter grated i accordace with 33 CFR 5.2036. Qualifyig Flag Admiistratios For flag admiistratios to qualify for the QUALSHIP 2 program, they must: Not have a three-year detetio ratio greater tha.0%. Have at least 0 PSC examiatios i the U.S. i each of the previous 3 years. Submit a Self-Assessmet of Flag Admiistratio (State) Performace to the IMO ad provide a copy to the U.S. Coast Guard. Submit a Executive Summary from their Member State Audit Scheme audit to the U.S. Coast Guard or submit a letter or email attestig to the fact that they have ot yet udergoe the audit but have submitted their request to be audited. 9

april 207 QUALSHIP 2 & E-ZERo Rewardig Your Commitmet to Quality, Safety ad the Eviromet Vessel Erollmet Vessel owers ad/or operators are required to submit the ame of the vessel, IMO umber, registered flag admiistratio, compay ame, ad compay IMO umber to the Coast Guard s Office of Commercial Compliace (CG-CVC-2). After receivig this iformatio, the Coast Guard will scree the iformatio ad make a determiatio of eligibility. Oce accepted ito the program, a QUALSHIP 2 Certificate will be issued to the compay ad the vessel. The vessel will the be listed o the CG-CVC-2 s QUALSHIP 2 web page. Vessel owers that have ships erolled i QUALSHIP 2 but do ot see their vessels o the QUALSHIP 2 web page should otify the Coast Guard at the address oted o this pamphlet. Applicatios for erollmet are processed i the order i which they are received. Our goal is to process each applicatio withi 30 days of receipt. Exit Criteria A vessel will o loger be eligible for icetives durig the period of the QUALSHIP 2 certificate, uder the followig coditios: The vessel is detaied ad determied to be substadard i U.S. waters. The vessel has a marie violatio, more tha oe upaid NOV ticket, or a reportable marie casualty that meets the defiitio of a serious marie icidet or major marie casualty. The vessel is foud with serious deficiecies (e.g., deficiecies that are cosidered serious eough to warrat the detetio of the vessel) that are ot beig moitored by the vessel s flag admiistratio or RO actig o behalf of the flag admiistratio, or if the vessel is foud to ot have reported a hazardous coditio prior to arrival. If the vessel is withi the time limits imposed by the flag admiistratio or RO to correct deficiecies, the vessel will ot lose eligibility for icetives. The vessel trasfers to a targeted RO. The vessel chages its flag admiistratio to oe that has a detetio ratio greater tha.0%, or to a flag admiistratio that does ot have at least 0 distict arrivals i each of the previous 3 years. The vessel is associated with a compay that is required by the U.S. Departmet of Justice or U.S. Coast Guard to have ad follow a Evirometal Compliace Pla due to crimial prosecutio or the vessel has ay other pedig crimial ivestigatios. A compay may request recosideratio from the U.S. Coast Guard (CG-CVC-2) to remai i the QUALSHIP 2 program or retai its E- Zero desigatio if it ows or operates a vessel that has bee associated with a IMO reportable detetio or evirometal deficiecy. Reewig Eligibility Vessel owers are required to reew their erollmet i the program. There is o loger automatic reerollmet ito the program. Furthermore, reewal of eligibility is established uder the same coditios as iitial certificatio, icludig the requiremet to have completed a successful U.S. PSC safety exam withi the previous 24 moths. Therefore, vessel owers are ecouraged to request a PSC safety exam from the local COTP durig U.S. port visits durig their 35th or 36th moth of the term of their QUALSHIP 2 certificate. Whe reewig eligibility, curret QUALSHIP 2 flag admiistratios whose 3-year rollig detetio ratio has goe above.0% will be give a oe-year extesio, provided that their ratio is below.05%. L I S H P 2 & E - Z A Q U E R o For More Iformatio Commadat (CG-CVC-2) Foreig & Offshore Vessel Compliace Divisio 2703 Marti Luther Kig Jr. Ave. SE STOP 750 Washigto, DC 20593-750 Phoe (202) 372-587 Email portstatecotrol@uscg.mil Website http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cgcvc/cvc2/safety.asp 20

Security Compliace Performace Chapter 3 ISPS/MTSA Security Compliace Targetig Matrix I II III IV V SHIP MANAGEMENT FLAG STATE RECOGNIZED SECURITY ORGANIZATION SECURITY COMPLIANCE HISTORY PORT OF CALL HISTORY (5) ISPS II Ower, if ew ower sice last ISPS exam 5 POINTS Ower, operator, or charterer associated with oe ISPS related deial of etry or ISPS related expulsio from port i the past 2 moths, or 2 or more ISPS/MTSA cotrol actios i a twelve moth period ISPS II If ew flag sice last ISPS exam 7 POINTS SOLAS Vessels () Flag State has a CAR 2 or more times the overall CAR average for all flag States 2 POINTS SOLAS Vessels () Flag State has a CAR betwee the overall CAR average ad up to 2 times overall CAR average for all flag States ISPS I 3 or more RSO related major cotrol actios i the past twelve moths 5 POINTS 2 RSO related major cotrol actios i the past twelve moths 2 POINTS RSO related major cotrol actio i the past twelve moths ISPS I Vessel with a ISPS related deial of etry/expulsio from port i past 2 moths (3) ISPS II If matrix score does ot result i ISPS I priority & o ISPS compliace exam withi the past 2 moths 5 POINTS Vessel with a ISPS/MTSA related detetio i the past twelve moths CONDITIONS OF ENTRY PRIOR TO ENTERING U.S. For last 5 ports, list of coutries ad/or port facilities, as specified by Federal Register, foud without effective ati-terrorism measures 7 POINTS No-SOLAS Vessels ()(2) Flag State has a CAR 2 or more times the overall CAR average for all flag States 2 POINTS Vessel with or more other ISPS/MTSA cotrol actios i the past twelve moths (4) TOTAL TARGETING SCORE Vessels that score 7 poits or higher are ISPS I vessels examied at sea prior to eterig port. Vessels that score betwee 7-6 poits are ISPS II vessels are examied i port. Vessels scorig fewer tha 7 poits are ISPS III vessels usually ot subject to examiatio uless selected radomly. () Pertais solely to Flag Admiistratios with more tha oe major cotrol actio i a 2 moth period. (2) Icludes vessels from o-solas sigatory coutries ad o-solas vessels from sigatory coutries. (3) COTP or OCMI may dowgrade a vessel s priority from ISPS I to ISPS II, or ISPS II to ISPS III depedig upo circumstaces surroudig a deial of etry. If deial of etry is solely from failure to provide a Notice of Arrival prior to etry ito the U.S., assig 2 poits. (4) Icludes vessel delays, restrictio of operatios, ad restrictio of movemet related to vessel security deficiecies. Does ot iclude routie examiatio of the ship or lesser admiistrative actios. (5) After July, 204 the Coast Guard o loger targeted vessels for ISPS exams based o their port call history. This colum will be removed i future PSC aual reports. 2

Chapter 3 Security Compliace Performace 206 Flag Admiistratio Security Compliace Performace The Coast Guard targets Flag Admiistratios for additioal ISPS examiatios if their Cotrol Actio Ratio (CAR) scores higher tha the overall average for all flags ad if a Admiistratio is associated with more tha oe major cotrol actio i the past three years. We calculate Major CARs based upo three years of eforcemet data (Jauary 204 to December 206). At the coclusio of caledar year 2005, the targetig CAR for all Admiistratios was fixed at.50%. Flags over the targetig CAR receive 2 poits o the ISPS/MTSA targetig matrix. Flag Admiistratios with a CAR at or above twice the targeted level receive 7 poits o the ISPS/MTSA targetig matrix. Flag Admiistratios Receivig 7 poits i Colum II of the ISPS/MTSA Targetig Matrix Noe 204-206 Cotrol Actio Ratio N/A Flag Admiistratios Receivig 2 poits i Colum II of the ISPS/MTSA Targetig Matrix 204-206 Cotrol Actio Ratio Noe N/A Flag Admiistratios Removed From Last Year s Targeted List Number of ISPS Detetios (204-206) 204-206 Cotrol Actio Ratio Egypt 50.00% Hoduras 0.00% Tazaia 2.7% 22

Security Compliace Performace Chapter 3 206 Flag Admiistratio Security Compliace Performace Statistics Flag () Security Exams Security Exams with Deficiecies Distict Arrivals ISPS Major Cotrol Actios Rollig Average Cotrol Actio Ratio Algeria 0 2 0 0.00% Aguilla 0 0 0.00% Atigua ad Barbuda 257 9 280 0.25% Bahamas, The 582 9 584 0 0.06% Bahrai 0 0 2 0 0.00% Bagladesh 0 0 0 0 0.00% Barbados 2 6 0 0.00% Belgium 7 2 22 0 0.00% Belize 0 0 2 0 0.00% Bermuda 86 2 70 0.45% Bolivia 6 0 8 0 0.00% British Virgi Islads 5 0 9 0 0.00% Bulgaria 0 0 0 0 0.00% Caada 27 23 0 0.00% Cayma Islads 79 3 254 0 0.00% Chile 7 0 5 0 0.00% Chia 44 0 6 0 0.00% Colombia 0 0 0 0 0.00% Comoros 0 0 0 0 0.00% Cook Islads 8 8 0 0.00% Croatia 3 0 5 0 0.00% Curacao 5 0 2 0 0.00% Cyprus 23 3 234 0 0.4% Demark 84 3 88 0 0.00% Domiica 3 0 2 0 0.00% Ecuador 0 0 0 0 0.00% Egypt 0 0 0 0 50.00% Filad 6 0 3 0 0.00% Frace 20 0 24 0 0.00% Germay 6 0 7 0 0.00% Gibraltar 30 36 0 0.00% Greece 230 0 27 0 0.3% Guyaa 0 0 0 0 0.00% Hoduras 3 0 0 0.00% If a Admiistratio has o distict arrivals to the Uited States for three cosecutive years, that Admiistratio may ot be listed. 23

Chapter 3 Security Compliace Performace 206 Flag Admiistratio Security Compliace Performace Statistics (cot.) Flag () Security Exams Security Exams with Deficiecies Distict Arrivals ISPS Major Cotrol Actios Rollig Average Cotrol Actio Ratio Hog Kog 655 2 770 0.6% Idia 5 0 7 0 0.00% Idoesia 0 0 0 0 0.00% Irelad 0 0 0 0.00% Isle of Ma 22 0 39 0 0.26% Israel 6 5 0 0.00% Italy 77 0 82 0 0.00% Jamaica 3 0 6 0 0.00% Japa 58 2 89 0 0.00% Kiribati 0 0 0 0.00% Kuwait 0 0 0.00% Latvia 0 0 0.00% Lebao 0 0 0 0 0.00% Liberia,028 2,4 0 0.03% Libya 3 0 5 0 0.00% Lithuaia 0 0 0 0 0.00% Luxembourg 8 0 0 0 0.00% Malaysia 8 0 8 0 0.00% Malta 59 6 559 0 0.2% Marshall Islads,229 3,34 0.06% Mexico 24 0 26 0 0.00% Moldova 4 0 2 0 0.00% Netherlads 80 2 77 0 0.00% New Zealad 0 2 0 0.00% Nigeria 0 0 3 0 0.00% Norway 29 2 27 0 0.00% Pakista 33.33% Palau 2 0 0.00% Paama,605 45,808 0.7% Peru 0 0 0 0 0.00% Philippies 44 4 53 0.88% Polad 0 0 0 0 0.00% Portugal 97 0 9 0 0.00% Qatar 3 0 5 0 0.00% If a Admiistratio has o distict arrivals to the Uited States for three cosecutive years, that Admiistratio may ot be listed. 24

Security Compliace Performace Chapter 3 206 Flag Admiistratio Security Compliace Performace Statistics (cot.) Flag () Security Exams Security Exams with Deficiecies Distict Arrivals ISPS Major Cotrol Actios Rollig Average Cotrol Actio Ratio Republic of Korea 30 2 34 0 0.00% Russia Federatio 5 0 6 0 0.00% Sait Kitts ad Nevis 3 0 3 0 0.00% Sait Vicet ad The Greadies 50 2 3 0.69% Samoa 3 0 2 0 0.00% Saudi Arabia 7 0 20 0 0.00% Seychelles 2 0 2 0 0.00% Sigapore 673 9 706 0 0.05% Spai 9 0 9 0 0.00% Sri Laka 3 0 3 0 0.00% Swede 7 0 7 0 0.00% Switzerlad 9 0 23 0 0.00% Taiwa 6 0 9 0 0.00% Tazaia 20 3 6 0 2.7% Thailad 4 0 9 0 0.00% Togo 4 4 2 0 0.00% Toga 0 0 0 0 0.00% Triidad ad Tobago 0 0 0 0 0.00% Turkey 29 0 29 0 0.00% Tuvalu 0 0 0.00% Uited Arab Emirates 2 0 3 0 0.00% Uited Kigdom 93 0 7 0 0.00% Uruguay 0 0 0.00% Vauatu 57 5 52 0 0.00% Veezuela 0 0 2 0 0.00% Vietam 0 0 0 0 0.00% If a Admiistratio has o distict arrivals to the Uited States for three cosecutive years, that Admiistratio may ot be listed. 25

Chapter 3 Security Compliace Performace Security Deficiecies by Category 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 203 4 4 4 4 4 4 204 205 3 3 3 3 3 206 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 Access Cotrol Restricted Areas Ship Security Officer Ship Security Pla Screeig Process All Other Major Cotrol Actios by Vessel 7 7 7 6 5 4 3 4 204 205 206 2 2 2 0 0 Bulk Carrier Cotaiership Geeral Dry Cargo Ship 0 0 0 0 Other Ro-Ro-Cargo Ship Oil Takship 0 26

U. S. Coast Guard Uit Spotlight Sector Puget Soud Sector Puget Soud offices are located i Seattle, WA, ad are co-located with other Coast Guard uits ad port parters, icludig Customs ad Border Protectio ad the Washigto State Patrol ad home to 725 active duty ad reserve military members as well as 54 civilia persoel. Specifically, the Port State Cotrol (PSC) Brach is composed of 4 Active Duty ad 32 Reserve persoel, who coduct PSC examiatios o deep draft cotaier, bulk, ad ro-ro freight ships; deep draft oil, chemical, ad gas takers; ad foreig tugs ad yachts. Sector Puget Soud has made atioal headlies i recet years for its ivolvemet i several high-profile evets. I November of 205, PSC Officers boarded a foreig flagged bulk freight vessel to coduct a aual PSC Exam. They discovered evidece of a MARPOL Aex I violatio, i which the vessel had discharged oil overboard by way of bypassig a ioperative Oily Water Separator via temporary pipig to the soot collectio tak. This case evetually resulted i the vessel s owers ad operators beig issued a fie of $.3 millio ad two of the vessel s egieers receivig priso seteces. Sector Puget Soud has also bee a leader amog iter-agecy efforts to combat the spread of Aquatic Ivasive Species (AIS). Earlier this year, PSC Officers idetified a bulk freight vessel that appeared to be dischargig ballast water illegally i the Port of Tacoma. Workig with Ivestigatios persoel, PSC Officers put together a strog evidece package, resultig i the prosecutio of the atio s first ballast water civil pealty case sice approval of ballast water maagemet treatmet systems. The ballast water maagemet regulatios came ito effect i 202. The uit maitais a strog cooperative relatioship with Trasport Caada i ad aroud the Salish Sea, promotig the harmoizatio of PSC efforts i the regio. The Sector, ad the people who carry out its operatios every day, are at the forefrot of the Coast Guard's core safety, security, ad evirometal protectio missios. 27

Uited States Port State Cotrol Cotact Iformatio Captai Matt Edwards Chief, Office of Commercial Vessel Compliace (CG-CVC) Commader Ala H. Moore Chief, Foreig ad Offshore Vessel Compliace Divisio (CG-CVC-2) Mr. Joh Sedlak Passeger Vessel Program Maager Lieuteat Commader Roberto Rivera PSC ad NOA Program Maager Mr. Christopher Gago Iteratioal Outreach/PSC Oversight Ms. Margaret Workma Port State Cotrol Admiistrative Maager Ms. Whitey Peters QUALSHIP 2/Large Fleet Admiistrative Maager Mr. Joe Marflak Iformatio Techologist Specialist U.S. Coast Guard STOP 750 2703 Marti Luther Kig Jr Ave S.E. Washigto, D.C. 20593-750 Atlatic Area Pacific Area Atlatic Area Commader (Lat-5) Pacific Area Commader 43 Crawford St. Coast Guard Islad, Bldg 50- Portsmouth, VA 23704-5004 Alameda, CA 9450-500 Ph (757) 398-6565 Ph (50) 437-5839 E-mail: LatPrevetio@uscg.mil Fax (50) 437-589 http://www.uscg.mil/latarea/ http://www.uscg.mil/pacarea/ st District 408 Atlatic Ave th District Coast Guard Islad, Bldg 50-6 Bosto, MA 020 Alameda, CA 9450-500 Ph.(67) 223-8555 Ph.(50) 437-2945 Fax (67) 223-87 Fax (50) 437-3223 5 th District 43 Crawford St. 3 th District 95 Secod Ave, Suite 3506 Portsmouth, VA 23704-5004 Seattle, WA 9874-067 Ph.(757) 398-6389 Ph.(206) 220-720 Fax (757) 39-849 Fax (206) 220-7225 7 th District 909 S.E. First Ave. 4 th District 300 Ala Moaa Blvd. Room 9-22 Miami, FL 333-3050 Hoolulu, HI 96850-4982 Ph.(305) 45-6860/ Ph.(808) 535-342 Fax (305) 45-6875 Fax (808) 535-3404 8 th District Hale Boggs Federal Buildig 7 th District 709 West 9th Street 500 Poydras Street Jueau, AK 99802-557 New Orleas, LA 7030 Ph.(907) 463-2802 Ph.(504) 589-205 Fax (907) 463-226 Fax (504) 67-2269 9 th District 240 E. 9 St. Clevelad, OH 4499-2060 Ph.(26) 902-6047 Fax (26) 902-6059 Lieuteat Commader Toya Lim PSCO Traiig ad Policy Maager, PSC Program Maager Lieuteat Commader Michael Hjerstedt PSC ad Security Compliace Program Maager, ISPS/MTSA Implemetatio Lieuteat Samuel Daus PSC ad QUALSHIP 2/Large Fleet Program Maager Phoe: (202) 372-25 http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cgcvc/cvc2/ Email: PortStateCotrol@uscg.mil Subscribe to Maritime Commos...The Coast Guard Blog for Maritime Professioals! http://mariers.coastguard.dodlive.mil/ Follow us o Twitter: @maritimecommos