How Technology-Based-Startups Support U.S. Economic Growth

Similar documents
How Technology-Based Start-Ups Support U.S. Economic Growth

Upgrading Voter Registration in Florida

Policies for TANF Families Served Under the CCDF Child Care Subsidy Program

SEASON FINAL REGISTRATION REPORTS

Report to Congressional Defense Committees

Building Blocks to Health Workforce Planning: Data Collection and Analysis

BUFFALO S SHIPPING POST Serving Napa Valley Since 1992

Advanced Nurse Practitioner Supervision Policy

Governor s Office of Electronic Health Information (GOEHI) The National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare

Practice Advancement Initiative (PAI) Using the ASHP PAI Ambulatory Care Self-Assessment Survey

National Committee for Quality Assurance

Patient-Centered Specialty Practice Readiness Assessment

CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM

Role of State Legislators

Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing:

Award Cash Management $ervice (ACM$) National Science Foundation Regional Grants Conference. June 23 24, 2014

Its Effect on Public Entities. Disaster Aid Resources for Public Entities

NCHIP and NICS Act Grants Overview and Current Status

National Provider Identifier (NPI)

Developmental screening, referral and linkage to services: Lessons from ABCD

Counterdrug(CD) Information Brief LTC TACKETT

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services practice management

National Perspective No Wrong Door System. Administration for Community Living Center for Medicare and Medicaid Veterans Health Administration

2017 Competitiveness REDBOOK. Key Indicators of North Carolina s Business Climate

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

College Profiles - Navy/Marine ROTC

RECOUNT RULES & VOTING SYSTEMS

National School Safety Conference Reno, Nevada / June 24 29, 2018

National Association For Regulatory Administration

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services payment and practice manaement

MapInfo Routing J Server. United States Data Information

Higher Education Employment Report

Prescription Monitoring Program:

Medicaid Innovation Accelerator Program (IAP)

United States Property & Fiscal Officer (USPFO)

Driving Change with the Health Care Spending Benchmark

Rebates & Incentives - WTF. Lee Guthman February 28, 2012

Poverty and Health. Frank Belmonte, D.O., MPH Vice President Pediatric Population Health and Care Modeling

The Use of NHSN in HAI Surveillance and Prevention

Kenneth E. Poole, PhD. National Conference of State Legislators August 11, 2012

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Tagalicod, Robert Anthony, and Jessica Kahn HIT Policy Committee January 10, 2012

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS. Panelist: Dr. Donna Peebles Associate Director

NEWS RELEASE. Air Force JROTC Distinguished Unit Award. MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. Unit OK at Union High School, Tulsa OK, has been

Summary of 2010 National Radon Action Month Results

Options Counseling in and NWD/ADRC System National, State & Local Perspectives

The Value and Use of CME in Medical Licensure

NSF Award Cash Management $ervice (ACM$) and Financial Update. June 1, 2015

The 2015 National Workforce Survey Maryland LPN Data June 17, 2016

Cesarean Delivery Model Meeting the challenge to reduce rates of Cesarean delivery

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LOCAL PARKS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2010 Agribusiness Job Report

The Legacy of Sidney Katz: Setting the Stage for Systematic Research in Long Term Care. Vincent Mor, Ph.D. Brown University

SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND

Home Health Agency (HHA) Medicare Margins: 2007 to 2011 Issue Brief July 7, 2009

Figure 10: Total State Spending Growth, ,

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Assuring Better Child Health and Development Initiative (ABCD)

NCCP. National Continued Competency Program Overview

Summary of 2011 National Radon Action Month Results

2017 STSW Survey. Survey invitations were sent to 401 STSW members and conference registrants. 181 social workers responded.

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services payment and practice management

Crisis Management: One Size Does Not Fit All. Todd Jenkins Sr. Loss Prevention Security Specialist Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.

BEST PRACTICES IN LIFESPAN RESPITE SYSTEMS: LESSONS LEARNED & FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Preventive Controls for Animal Food Inspections and Compliance

The Association of Community Cancer Centers 2011 Cancer Program Administrator Survey

2012 Federation of State Medical Boards


The Next Wave in Balancing Long- Term Care Services and Supports:

Medicaid Managed Care 2012 Fiscal Analysts Seminar August 30, 2012

DoD-State Liaison Update NCSL August 2015

FHWA Office of Innovative Program Delivery Mission

The MetLife Market Survey of Nursing Home & Home Care Costs September 2004

CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION OVERVIEW BY STATE

Care Provider Demographic Information Update

How to Research Business Opportunity with the National Guard

Pain Advocacy: A Social Work Perspective THANK YOU! First Things First. Incidence of Pain

2014 Giving Report. A Look at Fidelity Charitable Donors and How They Give. REPORT SPOTLIGHT How Donors Approach Philanthropy as a Family

50 STATE COMPARISONS

Small Business and the Defense Industrial Base

2016 STSW Survey. Survey invitations were sent to all STSW members and 2016 conference registrants. 158 social workers responded.

Subcontracting Tools. First Wednesday Virtual Learning Series 2018

States Roles in Rebalancing Long-Term Care: Findings from the Aging Strategic Alignment Project

131,,000 homeless veterans on any given night 300,000 homeless veterans during the year 23% of the total number of homeless people are veterans

Vizient/AACN Nurse Residency Program TM. Jayne Willingham, MN, RN, CPHQ Senior Director Nursing Leadership

Value based care: A system overhaul

MEMORANDUM Texas Department of Human Services * Long Term Care/Policy

Single Family Loan Sale ( SFLS )

State Partnership Performance Measures

Federal Highway Administration Future of Highway Funding

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality /Survey & Certification

Diversifying AAA/ADRCs Funding Streams: How states and their local partners can draw down federal Medicaid Administrative Match for ADRC/NWD Systems

ESMD Space Grant Collaboration

Licensee Requirements

ACRP AMBASSADOR PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Department of Homeland Security

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Readiness Kit

SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION STATUS REPORT NO. 2

FY2014 Supplemental Funding for Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) Grantees

Prescription Monitoring Programs - Legislative Trends and Model Law Revision

APPENDIX c WEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICES OF THE UNITED STATES

Transcription:

How Technology-Based-Startups Support U.S. Economic Growth November 28th, 2017 Join the Conversation: #ITIFtechstartups @ITIFdc

About ITIF Independent, nonpartisan research and education institute focusing on intersection of technological innovation and public policy, including: Innovation and competitiveness IT and data Telecommunications Trade and globalization Life sciences, agricultural biotech, and energy Mission to formulate and promote policy solutions that accelerate innovation and boost productivity Ranked by University of Pennsylvania as top science and technology think tank in United States and number two in world 2

Contents 1 2 3 4 5 Why Tech-Based-Startups? Methodology Overall Findings State and Congressional District Findings Policy Recommendations 3

Most Startups Are Not High-Growth Tech-Based 4

How Do We Explain? There s too much entrepreneurship: Disruption running wild! There's too little entrepreneurship: Economy stalling out! Marc Andreesen 5

Tech-Based Industries Outsized Economic Contributions Share of Business R&D Investment Share of R&D Jobs Share of Exports Share of Wages Share of Gross Output Share of Firms Share of Jobs 8.1% 6.2% 3.8% 3.6% 27.2% 58.7% 70.1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 6

Why Tech-Startups Matter Firm Characteristics Technology-Based Startup A Typical Startup Examples of Businesses Biotech, IT products or services Restaurants, Laundromats Growth Path Large potential for significant employment and revenue growth Addition of a few jobs for this first few years, and then bankruptcy Job Creation Tend to employ more highskilled/semi-skilled workers skilled/low-skilled workers Tend to employ more semi- Wages Pays more than twice the Pays less than the national national median wage median wage Job Multipliers Creates up to five indirect jobs Creates little to no net new in other industries jobs R&D Investments Invests heavily in R&D Little to no R&D investment Trade Focused on trade with international markets Sells predominately in local markets 7

Contents 1 2 3 4 5 Why Tech-Based-Startups? Methodology Overall Findings State and Congressional District Findings Policy Recommendations 8

Methodology Identified tech-industries according to: R&D intensity Tech-based classifications from U.S. BLS, OECD, and Eurostat Firm level data from Business Dynamics Research Consortium Industry level data from Census Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Venture Capital data from Pitchbook 9

Ten Tech-Based Industries Manufacturing Services 1. Aerospace Parts & Products 7. Computer Systems and Design 2. Computer and Electronics 8. Data Processing 3. Pharmaceuticals and Medicine 9. Software Publishing 4. Medical Devices 10. Scientific R&D 5. Semiconductor Components 6. Semiconductor Machinery 10

Contents 1 2 3 4 5 Why Tech-Based-Startups? Methodology Overall Findings State and Congressional District Findings Policy Recommendations 11

Industry Breakdown, Tech-Startups, 2016 24.1% Firm Count 3.4% 0.9% Employment 4.1% 27.9% 9.0% 2.3% 17.8% 0.9% 0.6% 19.9% 2.3% 0.4% 0.0% 13.8% 2.9% 29.0% 0.6% 0.1% 43.7% 12

Tech-Startups Are Up 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000-47% 40% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 All Firms Start-Ups Old Firms 13

Employment in Tech-Startups Has Grown 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000-7% 20% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 All Firms Start-Ups Old Firms 14

Tech-Startup Wages Are High and Growing $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $- $85,383 $46,366 $47,915 $39,100 $37,502 2007 2016 Start-Ups All Firms Tech-Based Start-Ups $102,531 15

Early-Stage Startups Are Down 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 16

Pharma and Semiconductors Have More Early-Stage Startups Pharmaceuticals and Medicines Manufacturing Semiconductor Machinery Manufacturing Aerospace Manufacturing Medical Devices Manufacturing Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Software Publishing Services Semiconductor Components Manufacturing Computer Systems Design Services Data Processing Services 5% 46% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 2016 2007 17

Venture-Capital Backed Startups in 2016 Total Aerospace Biotech & Pharma Medical Devices Information Technology VC-Backed Startups 19,573 154 1,303 1,935 16,181 Tech-Based Startups 175,247 1,732 12,078 6,254 127,126 VC Share of Startups 11% 9% 11% 31% 13% 18

Contents 1 2 3 4 5 Why Tech-Based-Startups? Methodology Overall Findings State and Congressional District Findings Policy Recommendations 19

Tech-Startups State-Findings In the median state 1,800 tech-startups out of 76,000 firms 17,000 jobs in tech-startups out of 1.6 million workers Tech-startups in the median state represents: 2.4 % of all businesses 0.9 % of all jobs 20

Tech-Startups, 2016 Top 5 States 1. New Hampshire 2. Massachusetts 3. California 4. Virginia 5. Maryland 21

SD ND WY IA MS AR MT NE WV RI KY OK ME LA MO HI WI KS SC ID NY VT IN PA AL Median MI TN OH DE MN IL UT NM Average FL NC GA NJ CT NV AK TX OR WA CO AZ MD VA CA MA NH Tech-Startup Firm Share, by State, 2016 5.0% 4.5% 4.0% Most states have similar levels of tech-startup activity 4.7% 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% 2.4% 2.9% 2.0% 1.5% 1.4% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 22

Tech-Startup Employment Share, by State, 2016 GA AZ AK OR Average CT UT WA NC NJ AL VA MD NH CO CA MA 3.0% 2.5% 2.4% 2.0% Most states have similar levels of employment in tech-startups 1.5% 1.0% 0.9% 1.2% 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% MS SD KY WY HI ND IA SC AR WV LA MT WI RI OH OK MI NV ME IN DE MO NE IL ID Median PA MN TX KS NY TN FL NM VT 23

Why Some States Attract More Tech-Startups Correlation of 0.75 between a state s level of technology-based startup activity and ITIF s 2017 State New Economy Index (SNEI) overall score. 24

Tech-Startups Congressional District Findings In the median Congressional district 300 tech-startups out of 13,000 firms 2,300 jobs in tech-startups out of 250,000 workers Tech-startups in the median district represents: 2.3 % of businesses 0.9 % of jobs 25

California-17 (Part of Silicon Valley) 2,700 tech-startups that employ 35,000 workers 16.1 % of businesses 6.4 % of workers Source: Wikipedia 26

Virginia-10 (Just Outside DC) 1,900 tech-startups that employ 18,000 workers 11.6% of businesses 5.8% of workers Source: Wikipedia 27

Texas-2 (In-and-Around Houston) 1,300 tech-startups that employ 9,700 workers This represents 8.9% of businesses 2.7% of workers Source: Wikipedia 28

Washington-1 (Just Outside Seattle) 1,300 tech-startups that employ 9,200 workers This represents 8.3% of businesses 3.5% of workers Source: Ballotpedia 29

Virginia-8 (Alexandria and Arlington) 1,300 tech-startups that employ 12,000 workers This represents 8.3% of businesses 3.4% of workers Source: Wikipedia 30

Contents 1 2 3 4 5 Why Tech-Based-Startups? Methodology Overall Findings State and Congressional District Findings Policy Recommendations 31

Policy Recommendations: Tax Expand the rate of the Alternative Simplified Credit to at least 25 percent from 14 percent. Amend Section 469 of the tax code to permit passive investors to take advantage of the net operating losses and research tax credits of companies in which they invest. Amend Section 382 of the tax code to make it easier for small companies to carry net operating losses forward even as they continue to attract new investors. 32

Policy Recommendations: Regulation Create a new Office of Innovation Policy within the Office of Management and Budget. The office would specifically review the impact major regulations would have on future innovation and would be empowered to force agencies to consider policies that would more effectively promote innovation. Charge the Office of Advocacy in the Small Business Administration with focusing solely on advocating for and reviewing federal regulations that affect new firms in technology-based industries. 33

Policy Recommendations: Stem Skills Establish NSF program to award prizes to universities that dramatically increase the rate at which freshmen STEM students graduate with STEM degrees. Establish NSF-industry Ph.D. fellows program. Expand STEM immigration 34

Policy Recommendations: Technology Transfer Establish SBIR-like set-aside program that to support technologycommercialization activities. Develop a Phase Zero SBIR award program. Develop metrics for universities to report entrepreneurship and commercialization information annually. 35

Thank You! @ITIFdc