New CMS Survey Initiatives Require Immediate Attention

Similar documents
Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group

CMS and DOH Enforcement Activities and Proactive Strategies

PACAH 2018 SPRING CONFERENCE April 26, 2018

The New Survey Process What To Expect Paula G. Sanders, Esq.

Writing a Plan of Correction

G-TAGS A RE T HEY THE N EW IJ S?

Pub State Operations Provider Certification Transmittal- ADVANCE COPY

IMPORTANT NOTICE PLEASE READ CAREFULLY SENT VIA FEDEX AND INTERNET (Receipt of this notice is presumed to be May 7, 2018 date notice ed)

Center for Medicaid, CHIP, and Survey & Certification/Survey & Certification Group. Memorandum Summary

IMPORTANT NOTICE PLEASE READ CAREFULLY SENT VIA FEDEX AND INTERNET

Informal Dispute Resolution and Independent Informal Dispute Resolution Key Elements and Updates

THE BIG PICTURE. The Impact of Survey In THE SURVEY & ENFORCEMENT SESSION: WHAT HAS CHANGED? OHCA Annual Convention/April 29, 2015

4/3/2018. Nursing Facility Changes to Conditions of Participation (& Enforcement): What You Need to Know. Revisions to State Operations Manual

Managing employees include: Organizational structures include: Note:

Lou Anne Page, HFE NE II

DIA COMPLIANCE OVERVIEW FOR HOME HEALTH AGENCIES

US Health Health Policy

Annual Quality Improvement Report: The Nursing Home Survey Process REPORT TO THE MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2014

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL. PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY Facility ID: 00695

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL. PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY Facility ID: 00719

07/23/ /21/2013 (L20)

Protecting, Maintaining and Improving the Health of Minnesotans

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL. PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY Facility ID: 00166

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY

6/29/2015. Focused Survey for MDS Assessment. Objectives: Review the results of the MDS pilot study.

Get Ready for Phase 1 of the New Requirements of Participation

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL. PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY Facility ID: 00903

James Anderson, State Fire Marshall

WHAT TO EXPECT IF YOUR FACILITY RECEIVES A G LEVEL OR ABOVE DEFICIENCY

Gary Nederhoff, Unit Supervisor

Patricia Halverson, Unit Supervisor

#212 How to Submit a Successful Informal Dispute Resolution (IDR)

Mary Heim, HPR-Social Work Specialist 09/03/2013

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality /Survey & Certification

Timothy Rhonemus, NFE NEII

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL. PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY Facility ID: 00360

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES SENIORS AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES DIVISION OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES CHAPTER 411 DIVISION 73

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY 3. NAME AND ADDRESS OF FACILITY

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Michelle McFarland, HFE NEII

Jessica Sellner, HFE, NEII 11/23/2011 Colleen B. Leach, Program Specialist 01/13/2012

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL. PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY Facility ID: 00351

Patricia Halverson, Unit Supervisor

Brenda Fischer, Unit Supervisor 09/13/2012 Colleen B. Leach, Program Specialist 09/18/2012

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL. PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY Facility ID: 00940

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL. PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY Facility ID: 00861

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL. PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY Facility ID: 00712

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL. PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY Facility ID: 00858

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY

Annual Quality Improvement Report on the Nursing Home Survey Process

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY 3. NAME AND ADDRESS OF FACILITY

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL. PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY Facility ID: 23242

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

AMENDED June 18, 2015 By Certified Mail and Facsimile

The request for informal dispute must be made within the same 10 calendar day period the facility has for submitting an acceptable plan of correction

Trends in Nursing Facility Standard Health Survey Citations

NEW LONG TERM CARE SURVEY PROCESS PHASE 2 REQUIREMENTS OF PARTICIPATION AUGUST 23, 2017

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL. PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY Facility ID: 00598

Report to the General Assembly: Nursing Home Inspection and Enforcement Activities. A Report to the 105 th Tennessee General Assembly

Complaint Investigations of Minnesota Health Care Facilities

Annual Quality Improvement Report on the Nursing Home Survey Process and Progress Reports on Other Legislatively Directed Activities

LeadingAge Maryland Update April 24, Office of Health Care Quality Protecting the health and safety of Marylanders

Health Care Reform (Affordable Care Act) Leadership Summit April 26, 2010 Cindy Graunke

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY 3. NAME AND ADDRESS OF FACILITY

Informal Dispute Resolution. Rules, Process, and Case Theory

CMS s RAI Version 3.0 Manual October 2016

MDS and Staffing Focus Surveys

Why is the Five Star Rating Important in Today s LTPAC Reimbursement World?

WhWwhaht. SNF CMS, RoP, Survey, and Regulatory Update October /25/2017. The New and Improved Survey Process

NEBRASKA DID NOT ALWAYS VERIFY CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING SURVEYS OF NURSING HOMES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE AND MEDICAID

NURSING FACILITY ASSESSMENTS

Center for Medicaid, CHIP, and Survey & Certification/Survey & Certification Group

Terri Ament, Unit Supervisor

AN ANALYSIS OF TITLE VI TRANSPARENCY AND PROGRAM INTEGRITY

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide. February 2015

Informal Dispute Resolution Finding Your Seat at the Table

SEP Memorandum Report: "Trends in Nursing Home Deficiencies and Complaints," OEI

MDS and STAFFING FOCUS SURVEYS

New Survey Focus MDS Accuracy and Staffing -Compliance Risk Alert-

Design for Nursing Home Compare 5-Star Rating System: Users Guide

What to Expect on Your Next Survey

MEDICARE/MEDICAID CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL PART I - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STATE SURVEY AGENCY 3. NAME AND ADDRESS OF FACILITY

Annual Quality Improvement Report on the Nursing Home Survey Process

Session Objectives. Long Term Care Luncheon: The CMS Five-Star Quality Rating System. Quality Ratings of U.S. Nursing Homes on Nursing Home Compare

THE SURVEY PROCESS THE ALF/SCALF SURVEY PROCESS 1/14/2016. Assisted Living Facilities and. Specialty Care Assisted Living Facilities

Marti Madrid, LBSW Marti Madrid, LBSW Team Lead/Healthcare Surveyor Division of Health Improvement Quality Management Bureau. Date: January 25, 2012

Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicaid Integrity Program

FLORIDA DID NOT ALWAYS VERIFY CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING SURVEYS OF NURSING HOMES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE AND MEDICAID

NURSING HOME SURVEILLANCE UPDATE

The SIA: Overcoming Organizational Fear of Closure

Cheryl Johnson, HFE NEII

Improving Nursing Home Compare for Consumers. Five-Star Quality Rating System

Center for Medicaid and State Operations/Survey and Certification Group. Promising Practices to Support the Intake of Nursing Home Complaints

Lesson #12: Survey and Certification Issues

SKILLED NURSING HOME RISK MONITOR METRICS

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group. Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 to FY 2017 Nursing Home Action Plan. Memorandum Summary

Medical Director Requirements for Nursing Facilities Advance Issuance of Revised Survey Guidance HIGHLIGHTS

Transcription:

PHCA Webinar March 17, 2015 New CMS Survey Initiatives Require Immediate Attention Paula G. Sanders, Esquire Chair, Health Care Practice Post & Schell, PC

Survey Overview Receive statement of deficiencies (2567) 10 days to file plan of correction Include disclaimer language 10 days to file state informal dispute resolution (IDR) or state independent IDR (IIDR) 2

Sanction Letters PA Department of Health (DOH) imposes sanctions against license and recommends sanctions to Centers for Medicare &Medicaid Services (CMS) CMS imposes sanctions against certification, often after time for state IDR has passed Challenges to federal civil money penalty (CMP) must include escrow of CMP 3

Sanction Letters Ability to file federal IIDR within 10 days of receipt of CMS CMP letter (often sent by certified or regular mail keep envelope) Federal IIDR will include contact of affected residents Waiver of appeal rights gets 35% reduction of CMP File notice within 60 days 4

Historical CMPs At exit, center advised of potential deficiencies 2567 sent along with recommendation of federal sanctions and possible state sanctions Typically federal per day CMPs (PD CMPs) begin at date of exit; rarely in 6 figure range Entering a new era of CMPs 5

New CMS CMP Analytic Tool New approach to federal per day (PD) CMPs Begin CMP on 1 st day noncompliance is documented, even if that date precedes the first day of the current survey Unless center can demonstrate that it corrected the noncompliance prior to the current survey (past noncompliance) CMS Survey & Certification Memo, Civil Money Penalty (CMP) Analytic Tool and Submission of CMP Tool Cases, S&C: 15-16-NH (Dec. 19, 2014) 6

Starting the PD CMP Calculate the start date for the proposed CMP with the first supportable date of noncompliance, as determined by the evidence documented by surveyors in the statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567) Surveyors instructed to determine the earliest date for which supportable evidence shows that the non-compliant practice began 7

Ambiguity About Start of Deficient Practice CMS analysts will contact state agency if start date is ambiguous or not clearly identified and supportable, to see if start date can be determined CMS analysts required to document their discussions and conclusion with the state agency 8

If Start Date Not Determinable If start date cannot be determined, then PD CMP would start on 1 st day during the survey on which the survey team identified the noncompliant practice If the team cannot document the first day of noncompliance, then the CMP should start on the day the noncompliance was observed and documented at the time of the current survey 9

Hypothetical F314 Deficiency S/S G Feb. 5 progress note identifies reddened area on R1 sacrum Feb. 12 weekly wound report identifies Stage 4 preventable pressure ulcer on R1 sacrum Aug. 4 survey identifies documentation error Surveyor interviews with DON and wound care nurse confirm that facility is unable to provide documentation that R1 s pressure ulcer was timely identified or that physician notified Pressure ulcer unresolved at exit on Aug. 5 10

F314 Hypo SNF regains compliance Sept. 5 Days of noncompliance under old analytic tool Exit date to compliance 30 days at $500 per day = $15,000 Days of noncompliance under new analytic tool First documented evidence to compliance 212 days at $500 per day = $106,000 11

CMP Culpability Add-Ons Neglect, indifference, or disregard for resident care, comfort or safety SNF responsible and culpable for actions of its management and staff, and contract staff Failure to act culpability amount up to $500 If management officials, e.g., administrator, director of nursing, facility owners, and/or the facility s governing body knew of problems but failed to act 12

13

Financial Hardship Requests [N]ot CMS's intent to impose CMPs that could, in and of themselves, put providers out of business. Providers can file compelling evidence of financial hardship, which CMS is willing, in the interest of the Medicare and Medicaid programs and their beneficiaries, to consider. 14

CMS Hardship Documentation Requirements Written, dated request specifying the reason financial hardship is alleged within 15 days of CMP letter Brief summary listing the supporting documents that are being submitted Current balance sheet, income statements and cash flow statements 15

CMS Hardship Documentation Requirements Most recent full year audited financial statements prepared by an independent accounting firm (including footnotes) Most recent full year audited financial statements of the home office and/or related entities (including footnotes) Disclosure of expenses and amounts paid/accrued to the home office and/or related entities 16

CMS Hardship Documentation Requirements Schedule showing amounts due to/from related companies, or individuals, included in the balance sheets Schedule should list the names of related organizations, or persons, and indicate where the amounts appear on the balance sheet (e.g., Accounts Receivable, Notes Receivable, etc.) 17

CMS Hardship Documentation Requirements If requesting an extended payment schedule of more than twelve (12) months duration, must submit a letter from a financial institution denying the provider's loan request for the amount of the CMP 18

Financial Hardship Requests Possible reduction of CMPs or 12 month repayment plan Analytic tool options: facility s documentation proves that: (1) the facility lacks sufficient assets to pay the CMP without having to go out of business, or (2) the facility does not lack sufficient assets to pay the CMP without having to go out of business. 19

Survey Strategy Reevaluate how you approach survey Surveyors may reject any documents not provided at time of survey Where are your critical documents What do your medical records look like How up to date is your filing Review 2567 carefully and prepare IDRs for any factual inaccuracies 20

Genesis of the New Focused Surveys Goal: assess MDS coding practices in relation to resident care, as well as staffing levels OIG 2013: SNFs reported inaccurate information, not supported or consistent with medical record, on at least one MDS item for 47% of claims OIG 2012: 99% of assessments of residents receiving atypical antipsychotic drugs missed at least one requirement 21

Genesis of the New Focused Surveys Look for evidence of involvement by a professional qualified in relevant care area to conduct a comprehensive assessment, such as a mental health professional OIG: 46% of records, RN was solely responsible for conducting resident assessment, even though residents may have had mental health conditions that needed to be assessed by qualified health professionals 22

New MDS and Staffing Focused Surveys New survey will be in addition to annual Medicare certification surveys 2-day survey focused on MDS accuracy and staffing Deficiencies will be cited and sanctions issued if warranted May result in a complaint survey 23

Pilot Program Findings Pilot program in 5 states (IL, MD, MN, PA, VA) 25 SNFs -- 96% error rate Inaccurate staging and documentation of pressure ulcers Lack of knowledge re classification of antipsychotic drugs Poor coding regarding use of restraints 24

Pilot Program Findings MDS assessment disagreements with medical records 25% for falls 18% for pressure ulcers 17% for restraints other than side rails 15% for late loss ADLs (including bed mobility, toileting, transfer and eating) 25

Areas Examined Timing of MDS completion Timing of MDS completion Timing of MDS completion RN coordination of MDS Antipsychotic medications Clinical conditions Pressure ulcers Late loss ADL status Indwelling catheters Urinary tract infections 26

Problems with Pressure Ulcers Proper identification of pressure ulcer Presence Worsening Staging CMS conclusion: errors in staging likely stemmed from a lack of an accurate clinical assessment and failure of staff to accurately stage pressure ulcers in the clinical record 27

Collateral Issues Potential repayment Obligation to repay within 60 days of identification of known overpayment PA Preventable Serious Adverse Events (PSAE) Act Preventable stage 3 & 4 pressure ulcers Changes in 5 star 28

Prepare Now Ongoing review of MDS accuracy with heightened attention to ADLs Engage your medical director and attending physicians Reevaluate wound care protocol Review MDS RAI Manual CMS not prepared to issue any additional guidance 29

Questions? Paula G. Sanders, Esquire Post & Schell, PC 17 North 2 nd Street, 12 th Floor Harrisburg, PA 17101 717-612-6027 psanders@postschell.com 30

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop C2-21-16 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 (Eièis CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group DATE: December 19, 2014 Ref: S&C: 15-16-NH TO: FROM: SUBJECT: State Survey Agency Directors Director Survey and Certification Group Civil Money Penalty (CMP) Analytic Tool and Submission of CMP Tool Cases Memorandum Summary Civil Money Penalty Analytic Tool Case Submissions - The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is issuing the following guidance to notify States that CMS Regional Offices (ROs) are required to continue to use the CMP Analytic Tool and guidance in establishing CMPs, but are no longer required to submit Civil Money Penalty (CMP) Analytic Tool cases to the CMS Central Office Use of Civil Money Penalty Analytic Tool - On March 22, 2013, CMS issued guidance that all CMS ROs were required to use this guidance and CMP Analytic Tool as a guide to choose the appropriate type of CMP to be imposed and to calculate the baseline CIvIIP amount, for all new enforcement cases when the CMS RO determines that a CMP is an appropriate enforcement remedy. Enhanced Enforcement Consistency - CMS issued the CMP Analytic Tool and guidance to promote more consistent application of enforcement remedies for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), nursing facilities (NFs), and dually-certified facilities (SNFINFs) (collectively referred to as "nursing homes" or "facility(ies)") Background The CMS ensures that nursing home residents receive appropriate care by setting health, safety and quality requirements that facilities must meet in order to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The CMS has agreements with States to routinely inspect nursing homes to ensure compliance with the requirements of participation. Congress has authorized CMS to impose certain enforcement remedies in order to promote a facility's compliance with these

Page 2 - State Survey Agency Directors requirements. Sections 1 819(h)(2)(B) and 1919(h)(3)(C) of the Social Security Act (the Act) provide that sanctions should be designed to minimize the time between the identification of violations and the final imposition of sanctions. CMS and States 1 may use a variety of remedies to encourage compliance. These remedies range from directing the specific actions and timeframes needed to correct a deficiency under a directed plan of correction to those that impose a monetary fine through the CMP for review and analysis. Beginning on April, 1, 2013, CMS ROs began piloting the CMP Analytic Tool. In an effort to monitor and evaluate the usefulness and effectiveness of this tool, ROs were asked to submit their final completed worksheets to CMS Central Office. As a follow up, in early 2014, the CMS held a conference call with each RO to discuss the efficiency, consistency and application of the CMP tool guidance and instructions. We discussed the usability and the need for additional training and/or clarification. Based on this feedback we made a number of changes and provided additional policy clarification and instructions. The CMP Analytic Tool was revised at the conclusion of the pilot and distributed to the CMS ROs on June 16, 2014. We found that the use of this Tool helped with nationally consistent application and imposition of CMPs and will help shape the language of future proposed guidance related to CMPs and other enforcement remedies. Selecting Enforcement Remedies: (refer to 42 CFR 488.404 and section 7400 in Chapter 7 of the State Operations Manual (SOM)) The ROs must evaluate each case and consider whether or not to impose an enforcement remedy or multiple remedies as appropriate. When choosing enforcement remedies, CMS and the State must consider the following: The Scope and Severity (S/S) of the deficiency(ies); The relationship of one deficiency to other deficiencies resulting in noncompliance; A facility's prior history of noncompliance; and The likelihood that the selected remedy(ies) will achieve correction and continued compliance. The severity of the remedy should increase with the severity of the deficiency(ies), (see 42 CFR 488.408 through 488.414). For example, for noncompliance that is cited at the immediate jeopardy level, S/S levels J, K, and L, the regulations require that either a facility is terminated within 23 days or temporary management is imposed to remove the immediate jeopardy within 23 days. Additionally, CMPs from $3,050 to $10,000 per day or $1,000 to $10,000 per instance of noncompliance may also be imposed. Similarly, noncompliance that is actual harm (S/S levels G, H, and I), require one or a combination of the following remedies: Temporary management; Denial of Payment for New Admissions (DPNA); In addition to Federal remedies, some States have the authority to impose State sanctions under state licensure.

Page 3 - State Survey Agency Directors Per day CMP of $50 to $3,000; or Per instance CMP of $1,000 to $10,000 per instance of noncompliance. In addition to these required remedies, additional remedies may be imposed for noncompliance that is actual harm. For example, depending on the severity of the deficiency and a facility's compliance history, a combination of state monitoring, DPNA, and a CMP may be imposed. For cases in which the State Survey Agency fails to recommend a CMP, the RO must evaluate whether or not a CMP remedy is warranted. In such cases, the RO must review the survey findings and impose the appropriate remedy(ies) regardless of a State's recommendation or failure to make a recommendation. Use and Imposition of CMPs as an Enforcement Remedy We are issuing both the attached CMP Analytic Tool User's Guide as an attachment specifically when a CMP is one of the selected remedies. All ROs must use the CMP Analytic Tool when the RD has determined that a CMP is an appropriate enforcement remedy. The CMP Tool itself is internal CMS software. The CMP Analytic Tool User's Guide (attached) describes the requirements regarding the use of the tool and the instructions on proper use of the Tool. The ROs must evaluate each case and consider whether or not to impose a CMP in addition to or instead of other remedies for deficiencies with a Scope and Severity (S/S) of "G," or above, and for deficiencies with a S/S of"f" when Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) is cited. For deficiencies cited at other S/S levels, the RO should consider imposing alternative remedies other than a CMP as appropriate. The ROs must use this tool in the calculation of each new or changed 2 CMP imposed on a facility within a noncompliance cycle 3. Each time a survey is conducted within an already running noncompliance cycle and a CMP is imposed, the facility is given appeal rights and may exercise its waiver of right to a hearing (refer to section 7526 of the State Operations Manual (SOM), Chapter 7). This tool is not intended to yield an automatic, immutable end result in the calculation of a CMP. It does not replace professional judgment or the application of other pertinent information in arriving at a final CMP amount. However, it does provide logic, structure, and defined factors for mandatory consideration in the determination of CMPs. The tool should be used with the CMP Analytic Tool User's Guide, which more fully explains factors and policies that lead to final CMP amounts. 2 A CMP is changed when the circumstances initiating the original CMP imposed have changed and an increase or decrease to the original CMIP may be warranted. For example, a facility has corrected some but not all of the original deficiencies and is still within its noncompliance cycle and the remaining deficiencies warrant an increase or decrease in the original CMP imposed. See section 7516.3 of the SOM. A noncompliance cycle begins with a recertification, complaint or temporary waiver revisit survey that finds noncompliance and ends when substantial compliance is achieved or the facility is terminated (or voluntarily terminates) from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The noncompliance cycle cannot exceed 6 months. Once a remedy is imposed, it continues until the facility is in substantial compliance (and in some cases, until it can demonstrate that it can remain in substantial compliance), or is terminated from the programs.

Page 4 - State Survey Agency Directors If you have any questions regarding this memorandum, tool, or guidance, please contact Akosua Ghailan at (410) 786-8047 or at Akosua.Ghai1an2cms.hhs.gov. Effective Date: Immediately for all enforcement cases when the CMS RO determines that a CMP is an appropriate enforcement remedy. This guidance should be communicated to all RO and State Survey Agency survey, certification and enforcement staff, their managers and the State/RO training coordinators within 30 days of this memorandum. Attachment- CMP Analytic Tool User's Guide Is! Thomas E. Hamilton cc: Survey and Certification Regional Office Management

MS CONTERS for ME()lCRE & MEDICAID SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Clinical Standards & Quality Survey & Certification Group Division of Nursing Homes CMP Analytic Tool User's Guide Version 1.0

Contents 1 OVERVIEW... 1 2 CMPANALYTICTOOL... 2 2.1 INTRODUCTION SECTION... 2 2.2 "SELECTTHE CALCULATION TYPE" SECTION...3 2.3 "ENTER THE CASE INFORMATION" SECTION... 4 2.4 "SELECT THE CMP TYPE (PER DAY OR PER INSTANCE)" SECTION...5 2.5 "SELECT THE CMP START AND END DATES (ONLY FOR PER DAY CM PS)" SECTION... 6 2.6 "SELECT THE CMP BASE AMOUNT" SECTION... 7 2.7 "Is THERE A HISTORY OF FACILITY NONCOMPLIANCE?" SECTION... 8 2.8 "ARE THERE REPEATED DEFICIENCIES? (ONLY FOR PER DAY CMP5)" SECTION... 9 2.9 "HAS A SUBSTANDARD QUALITY OF CARE (SQC) BEEN CITED?" SECTION... 10 2.10 "INDICATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF "F" OR "K" TAGS CITED THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE CMP (ONLY FOR PER DAYCM PS)" SECTION... ii 2.11 "IS FACILITY CULPABILITY A FACTOR?" SECTION... 12 2.12 "DOES THE CALCULATED CMP AMOUNT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM REGULATORY AMOUNT?" SECTION... 13 2.13 "Is THE FACILITY FINANCIAL CONDITION A FACTOR?" SECTION... 14 2.14 "DETERMINE THE FINAL CALCULATED CMP AMOUNT" SECTION... 15 2.15 "IS AN ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENT TO THE FINAL CALCULATED CM P AMOUNT NECESSARY?" SECTION... 16 2.16 "ENTER ANY ADDITIONAL CASE-RELATED INFORMATION (OPTIONAL)" SECTION... 17 2.17 "VIEw CALCULATION TOTALS" SECTION... 18 2.18 "VIEw CALCULATION SUMMARY" SECTION... 19 3 INSTRUCTIONS... 20 3.1 INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE AND COMPLETION OF THE CIVIL MONEY PENALTY (CMP) ANALYTIC TOOL...20 3.2 CHOOSING THE TYPE OF CMP TO BE IMPOSED...21 3.3 CHOOSING THE PD CMP START DATE...22 3.4 GUIDANCE ON DETERMINING THE DATES OF A PD CMP...22 3.5 CMP5 FOR PAST NONCOMPLIANCE... 23 3.6 REQUIRED CENTRAL OFFICE PRIOR APPROVAL FOR ANY ADJUSTMENT TO FINAL CALCULATED CMP AMOUNT OF MORE THAN THIRTY-FIVE PERCENT (35%)...23 3.7 FOR TRAINING AND GENERAL EXAMPLES ONLY...24

Introduction Instructions Setect the Calculation Type Enter the Case Information Select the CMP Type Select the CMP Start and End Dates Select the CMP Base Amount Select the CMP Base Amount Is There a History of Noncompliance? Is There a History of Noncompliance? Are There Repeated Deficiencies? Has SOC Been Cited? Has SOC Been Cited? Indicate the Total Number of F or K Tags Is Financial Culpability a Factor? Does the Calculated CMP Amount Exceed the Maximum? Is the Facility Financial Condition a Factor? Determine the Final Calculated CMP Is An Additional Adjustment Necessary? Enter Any Additional Information View Calculation Totals View Calculation Summary

2 CMP Analytic Tool 2.1 Introduction Section 2.1.1 Instructions All CMS Regional Offices (ROs) are required to use the following CMP Analytic Tool and Instructions: (1) to choose the appropriate type of CMP to be imposed; and (2) to calculate the CMP amount, when the RO determines that a CMP is an appropriate remedy to impose. The RO must complete all sections of the tool that apply to the type of CMP selected. Please refer to the CMP Analytic Tool User's Guide for information about using this tool. Note: Use a separate calculation for each Life Safety Code (LSC) CMP, Health Survey CMP, or any new or changed CMP within a noncompliance cycle. Always use the tool at this link (save in your bookmarks/favorites) for the most current version. Required fields are marked with an asterisk. *

2.2 "Select the Calculation Type" Section 2.2.1 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages Calculation Preliminary Select "Final" if in compliance or Please select a calculation Type Final terminated, type. (Required)

2.3 "Enter the Case Inform ation" Section 2.3.1 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages CCN Text N/A Please enter a CCN. (Required) Confirm CCN Text N/A Please enter the CCN again. (Required) The CCN does not match, please try again. Provider Name Text N/A Please enter a Provider Name. (Required) Analyst Name Text Enter full name (first and last Please enter the Analyst Name. (Required) name). Cycle Start Text Enter the date in mm/dd/yyyy Please enter a Cycle Start Date. Date format. Please enter a valid date in mm/dd/yyyy (Required) format.

2.4 "Select the CMP Type (Per Day or Per Instance)" Section 2.4.1 Instructions Section 1819(h)(2)(B)(ii) of the Social Security Act. The factors to consider in this tool for each type of CMP are intended to determine amounts for each CMP to be imposed. Also, if a Life Safety Code (LSC) deficiency is the basis for the CMP, the whole Tool algorithm applies to the LSC deficiencies, not the health deficiencies. Note: This tool is to be used to calculate an amount for each new or changed CMP imposed against a facility within a noncompliance cycle. 2.4.2 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages CMP Type Per Day CMP (PD) For each instance where a CMP Please (Required) Per Instance CMP (P1) will be imposed for a facility, select a select only one CMP Type to be CMP Type. used: Per Day or Per Instance. Always choose a PD CMP if none of the P1 factors is present. Select a P1 CMP only when one or more of the associated factors are present (check all applicable factors). CMP Per Finding of noncompliance that is a N/A Please Instance singular event of actual harm at a S/S select one Factors at "G" or 11.111 or more Findings of current/ongoing factors for noncompliance at a S/S of "G" or above, or SQC findings at "F" but where a facility has a good compliance history Findings of past noncompliance when dates of noncompliance cannot be determined at a S/S of "G" or above or SOC findings at a S/S of "F". the selected CMP Type. 5

2.5 "Select the CMP Start and End Dates (Only for Per Day CMPs)" Section 2.5.1 Instructions PD CMP Start Date - A PD CMP should begin on the first day noncompliance at the cited S/S level is documented, even if that date precedes the first day of the current survey unless the facility can demonstrate that it corrected the noncompliance prior to the current survey (past noncompliance). If the team cannot document the first day of noncompliance, then the CMP should start on the date the noncompliance was observed and documented at the time of the current survey. PD CMP End Date - Except in cases when IJ is removed on the same date that it was identified, do not include the day on which IJ is removed, the day the S/S is lowered, thereby lowering the CMP amount to another level or substantial compliance is achieved when calculating the final PD CMP. 2.5.2 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages CMP Start Text Enter the date in mm/dd/yyyy Please enter a CMP Start Date. Date format. Please enter a valid date in mm/dd/yyyy format. Please select a CMP Type of Per Day for this field. Please select a start date that is on or before the end date. CMP End Text Enter the date in mm/dd/yyyy Please enter a CMP End Date. Date format. Please enter a valid date in mm/dd/yyyy format. Please select a CMP Type of Per Day for this field. Please select a start date that is on or before the end date.

2.6 "Select the CMP Base Amount" Section 2.6.1 Instructions Select the highest S/S level for the base Calculated CMP Amount. 2.6.2 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages CMP Base Per Day - Regional Office Discretion - $50 Select the highest Please select a Amount Per Day - Regional Office Discretion - D - S/S level for the CMP Base (Required) $100 base Calculated Amount. Per Day - Regional Office Discretion - CMP Amount. $150 Per Day - Potential for More than Minimal - F - $200 Per Day - Actual Harm - S/S Level G - $250 Per Day - Actual Harm - S/S Level H - $600 Per Day - Actual Harm - S/S Level I -$1000 Per Day - Immediate Jeopardy - S/S Level J - $3050 Per Day - Immediate Jeopardy - S/S Level K - $4050 Per Day - Immediate Jeopardy - S/S Level L - $5050 Per Instance - Potential for More than Minimal - S/S Level F -$1,200 Per Instance - Actual Harm - S/S Level G - $1,500 Per Instance - Actual Harm - S/S Level H - $2,000 Per Instance - Actual Harm - S/S Level I - $2,500 Per Instance - Immediate Jeopardy - S/S Level J - $3500 Per Instance - Immediate Jeopardy - S/S Level K - $4500 Per Instance - Immediate Jeopardy - S/S Level L - $5500 Abated IJ Yes N/A N/A

2.7 "Is There a History of Facility Noncompliance?" Section 2.7.1 Instructions 42 CFR 488.438(f)(1). If a facility has a history and/or a pattern of noncompliance at a S/S of "G" or above for surveys (standard, complaint, or revisit) conducted in the past 3 calendar years, add an amount indicated below based on the S/S pattern/trend of a facility's noncompliance history. 2.7.2 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages Facility Number Enter a dollar amount (no cents) to add Please enter a positive Noncompliance to the Calculated CMP Amount. Do not dollar amount (no cents) Amount Added add less than $100 or more than $500. from 100 to 500.

2.8 "Are There Repeated Deficiencies? (Only for Per Day CMPs)" Section 2.8.1 Instructions 42 CFR 488.438(d)(2)(3). "Repeated Deficiencies" are deficiencies within the same regulatory grouping of requirements under which deficiencies were cited at the last survey, subsequently corrected, and cited again at the next survey. 2.8.2 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages Repeated Per Day - S/S Level F - Add Select the amount to Please select a CMP Deficiencies $50 add to the Calculated Type of Per Day for this Amount Added Per Day - S/S Level G, H, I - CMP Amount based on field. Add $100 the highest S/S level of Per Day - S/S Level J, K, L - the repeat deficiencies. Add $150

2.9 "Has a Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) Been Cited?" Section 2.9.1 Instructions 42 CFR 488.438(d)(2)(3). SOC is defined for deficiencies cited at a S/S "F", "H", "I", "i', "K", or "L" within the regulatory groupings of 42 CFR 483.13 (Tags F221-F226), 42 CFR 483.15 (Tags F240-F258), or 42 CFR 483.25 (Tags F309-F333). 2.9.2 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Repeated Per Day - S/S Level F - Add $50 Select the amount to N/A Deficiencies Amount Per Day - S/S Level H, I - Add $100 add to the Calculated Added Per Day - S/S Level J, K, L - CMP Amount based Add $500 on the highest SOC Per Instance - S/S Level F - Add $500 S/S level. Per Instance - S/S Level H, I - Add $1,000 Per Instance - S/S Level J, K, L - Add $2,500 Messages 10

2.10 "Indicate the Total Number of "F" or "K" Tags Cited that Contributed to the CMP (Onlyfor Per Day CMPs)" Section 2.10.1 Instructions 42 CFR 488.438(d)(2)(3). SOC is defined for deficiencies cited at a S/S "F' t, " H", "I", 'i", "K", or "L" within the regulatory groupings of 42 CFR 483.13 (Tags F221-F226), 42 CFR 483,15 (Tags F240-F258), or42 CFR 483.25 (Tags F309-F333). 2.10.2 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages Total Number Per Day - 1-6 F or K Tags - S/S Level F at Select the number Please select a of Tags Cited SQC- Add $0 of tags and the CMP Type of Per Amount Per Day - 1-6 F or K Tags - S/S Level G, H, I - amount (if any) to Day for this Added Add $so add to the field. Per Day - 1-6 F or K Tags - S/S Level J, K, L - Calculated CMP Amount based on Add $400 the highest S/S Per Day - 7-10 F or K Tags - S/S Level F at level. Do not SQC- Add $0 include Per Day - 7-10 F or K Tags - S/S Level G, H, I deficiencies for - Add $100 which the S/S set Per Day - 7-10 F or K Tags - S/S Level J, K, L the base amount - - Add $450 use the next Per Day - 11-19 F or K Tags - S/S Level F at highest S/S level. SOC- Add $0 Per Day - 11-19 F or K Tags - S/S Level G, H, I - Add $150 Per Day - 11-19 F or K Tags - S/S Level J, K, L- Add $500 Per Day - 20+ F or K Tags - S/S Level F at SQC- Add $50 PerDay-20+ForKTags-S/S LeveIG, H, I -Add $200 Per Day - 20+ F or K Tags - S/S Level J, K, L - Add $550 11

2.11 "Is Facility Culpability a Factor?" Section 2.11.1 Instructions 42 CFR 488.438(f)(4). Add an amount indicated below if culiability is a factor, this can include neglect, indifference, or disregard for resident care, comfort, or safety. A facility may be held responsible and culpable for the actions of its management and staff, and contract staff. 2.11.2 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages Base Number Enter a dollar amount (no cents) to add to the Please enter a Culpability Calculated CMP Amount based on the highest S/S level positive dollar Amount cited: amount (no cents) Added "F" at SOC - Add $100-$250 from 100 to 2,250. "G", "H", "I" - Add $300 - $1,000 11.1 11 1 "K", "L" - Add $1,250 - $2,250 Failure to Act Number Enter a dollar amount (no cents) to add to the Please enter a Culpability Calculated CMP Amount, If it can be documented that positive dollar Amount management officials, e.g., administrator, director of amount (no cents) Added nursing, facility owners, and/or the facility's governing from 1 to 500. body knew of problems but failed to act - Add up to $500. Facility Text N/A N/A Culpability Rationale 12

112 "Does the Calculated CMP Amount Exceed the Maximum Regulatory Amount?" Section 2.12.1 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages Reduced Per Day - Calculated CMP Amount for Ii Select the highest N/A Calculated CMP Case > $10,000 - Reduce Calculated permissible CMP Amount CMP Amount to $10,000 amount. Per Day - Calculated CMP Amount for Non-li Case > $3,000 - Reduce Calculated CMP Amount to $3,000 Per Day - Calculated CMP Amount for Non-li Case> $3,000 and a repeat deficiency - No change Per Instance - Calculated CMP Amount Exceeds $10,000 - Reduce Calculated CMP Amount to $10,000 13

2.13 'Is the Facility Financial Condition a Factor?" Section 2.13.1 Instructions 42 CFR 488.438(f)(2). A facility is responsible for notifying CMS of hardship and providing financial documentation. 2.13.2 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages Lower Calculated Number Enter a dollar amount Please enter a CMP Amount (no cents). Select an positive dollar option below if amount (no applicable, cents). Lower Calculated CMS reviewed the financial N/A N/A CMP Amount information and determined that Selection facility documentation proves (select one): The facility lacks sufficient assets to pay the CMP without having to go out of business. The facility does not lack sufficient assets to pay the CMP without having to go out of business. 14

2.14 "Determine the Final Calculated CMP Amount" Section 2.14.1 Instructions The Final Calculated CMP is determined according to CMP Type: The lowest Calculated CMP Amount is determined: lowest of Calculated CMP Amount, Reduced Calculated CMP Amount (adjusted for exceeding the maximum regulatory amount), and Lower Calculated CMP Amount (adjusted for facility financial condition). Final Calculated CMP Amount, Per Day: The lowest Calculated CMP Amount multiplied by the Total CMP days, less any Discount. Final Calculated CMP Amount, Per Instance: The lowest Calculated CMP Amount, less any Discount. 2.14.2 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages Discounts No Discount N/A Please select an option Applied to Final Discount for Waiving Appeal (35%) above so the final Calculated CMP Discount for Self-reporting and Amount Waiving Appeal (50%) amount may be calculated. Please select a CMP Type, Start and End Dates if Per Day CMP, and a Base CMP Amount before selecting this option. 2.14.3 Output Field Final Calculated CMP Amount Description N/A 15

2.15 "Is An Additional Adjustment to the Final Calculated CMP Amount Necessary?" Section 2.15.1 Instructions The Final Calculated CMP Amount may be adiusted by no more than 35%. If an Adjusted Final Calculated CMP Amount is entered, provide a rationale below. If the RO believes that the Final Calculated CMP Amount should be adjusted by more than 35%, they must consult with and obtain prior approval from the CO before making any further adjustment using this tool. 2.15.2 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages Adjusted Final Number Enter a dollar amount (no cents). Adjust the Final Please enter a positive Calculated CMP Calculated CMP Amount (which is the total dollar amount (no Amount amount for Per Instance or Per Day) and enter cents). above. Note: The amount entered should reflect Please select an the total amount (not a Per Day amount). option above to calculate the Final Calculated CMP Amount first. Adjusted Final Text N/A Please provide a Calculated CMP Amount Rationale rationale. 16

2.16 "Enter Any Additional Case-Related Information (Optional)" Section 2.16.1 Input Field I I Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages Additional Information I Text I N/A Please provide a rationale. 17

2.17 "View Calculation Totals" Section 2.17.1 Output Field Calculated CMP Amount Reduced Calculated CMP Amount Lower Calculated CMP Amount Total CMP Days Discounts Applied to Final Calculated CMP Amount Final Calculated CMP Amount Adjusted Final Calculated CMP Amount Total Final CMP Amount Description The Calculated CMP Amount is the sum of CMP Base Amount and Facility Noncompliance Amount, Repeated Deficiencies Amount (Per Day only), - Substandard Quality of Care Amount, Total Number of Tags Cited Amount (Per Day only), Base Culpability Amount, and Failure to Act Culpability Amount, if any. The Reduced Calculated CMP Amount is the amount after the adjustment for exceeding the maximum regulatory amount, if any. The Lower Calculated CMP Amount is the amount after the adiustment for facility financial concrition if any. The Total CMP Days for Per Day is the total number of days from the CMP Start Date to the CMP End Date. The Discounts Applied to Final Calculated CMP Amount include one of the following options: No discount, 35% discount if waiving appeal, or 50% discount for self-reporting and waiving appeal. The Final Calculated CMP Amount for Per Day is the lowest Calculated CMP Amount multiplied by the Total CMP days, less any Discount. Note: This is a total amount, not a Per Day amount. The Final Calculated CMP Amount for Per Instance is the lowest Calculated CMP Amount, less any Discount. The Adjusted Final Calculated CMP Amount is the amount after the adiustment to the Final Calculated CMP Amount. Note: This is a total amount, not a Per Day amount. The Total Final CMP Amount is the Adjusted Final Calculated CMP Amount if an adjustment was made, otherwise the Final Calculated CMP Amount.

2.18 "View Calculation Summary" Section 2.18.1 Input Field Input Detailed Instructions Error Messages Display Calculation N/A Note: If changes are made to any of the Please correct the errors Summary fields above, display Calculation Summary above then display the again. Calculation Summary again. Begin a New Case N/A N/A N/A 2.18.2 Output Field Calculation Type CCN Provider Name Analyst Name Cycle Start Date Current Date CMP Type CMP Per Instance Factors CMP Start Date CMP End Date Abated IJ CMP Base Amount Selection CMP Base Amount Facility Noncompliance Amount Added Repeated Deficiencies Selection Repeated Deficiencies Amount Added Substandard Quality of Care Selection Substandard Quality of Care Amount Added Field (Continued) Total Number of Tags Cited Selection Total Number of Tags Cited Amount Added Base Culpability Amount Added Failure to Act Culpability Amount Added Facility Culpability Rationale Calculated CMP Amount Reduced Calculated CMP Amount Selection Reduced Calculated CMP Amount - Maximum Exceeded Lower Calculated CMP Amount - Financial Condition Lower Calculated CMP Amount Selection Discounts Applied to Final Calculated CMP Amount Total CMP Days Final Calculated CMP Amount Adjusted Final Calculated CMP Amount Rationale for Adjusted Final Calculated CMP Total Final CMP Amount Additional Information 19

3 Instructions 31 Instructions for Use and Completion of the Civil Money Penalty (CMP) Analytic Tool All CMS Regional Offices (ROs) are required to use the following instructions and CMP Analytic Tool: (1) to choose the appropriate type of CMP to be imposed; and (2) to calculate the CMP amount7wh-eitth-e-ro-determin-es-that -a-cmp-is-an-appropriate-remedy -to-impo5ehehe -RO must complete all sections of the tool that apply to the type of CMP selected. ROs must evaluate each case and consider whether or not to impose a CMP in addition to or instead of other remedies for deficiencies with a Scope and Severity (S/S) of "G," or above, and for deficiencies with a S/S of "F" when Substandard Quality of Care (SOC) is cited. For deficiencies cited at other S/S levels, the RO should consider imposing alternative remedies other than a CMP as appropriate. For cases in which the State Survey Agency fails to recommend a CMP, the RO must evaluate whether or not a CMP remedy is warranted. In such cases, the RO must review the survey findings and impose the appropriate remedy(ies) regardless of a State's recommendation. ROs must use this tool in the calculation of each new or changed' CMP imposed on a facility within a noncompliance cycle 2. Each time a survey is conducted within an already running noncompliance cycle and a CMP is imposed, the facility is given appeal rights and may exercise its waiver of right to a hearing (refer to section 7526 of the State Operations Manual (SOM), Chapter 7). This tool is not dispositive, and does not replace professional judgment or the application of other pertinent information in arriving at a final CMP amount. However, it does provide logic, structure, and defined factors for mandatory consideration in the determination of CMPs. The tool should be used with this protocol, which more fully explains factors that lead to final CMP amounts. A CMP is changed when the circumstances initiating the original CMP imposed have changed and an increase or decrease to the original CMP may be warranted. For example, a facility has corrected some but not all of the original deficiencies and is still within its noncompliance cycle and the remaining deficiencies warrant an increase or decrease in the original CMP imposed. See section 7516.3 of the SOM. 2 A noncompliance cycle begins with a recertification, complaint or temporary waiver revisit survey that finds noncompliance and ends when substantial compliance is achieved or the facility is terminated (or voluntarily terminates) from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The noncompliance cycle cannot exceed 6 months. Once a remedy is imposed, it continues until the facility is in substantial compliance (and in some cases, until it can demonstrate that it can remain in substantial compliance), or is terminated from the programs. 20

3.2 Choosing the Type of CMP to be Imposed After making a determination that a CMP will be imposed, ROs must use the Tool and the following guidance to decide whether to impose a Per Instance (P1) CMP versus a Per Day (PD) CMP, regardless of the State Survey Agency's recommendation. PD CMP - Always choose a PD CMP if none of the P1 factors is present. A PD CMP is generally CMP range from $50 to $10,000 for each day a facility is noncom pliant: from $50 to $3,000 for non-immediate jeopardy noncompliance, and $3,050 to $10,000 for immediate jeopardy (IJ) noncompliance. P1 CMP - Choose a P1 CMP ONLY when one or more of the following factors are present: 1. Finding of noncompliance that is a singular event of actual harm at a S/S at G' or 2. Findings of current/ongoing noncompliance at a S/S of "G" or above, or SOC findings at "F" but where a facility has a good compliance history; and/or 3. Findings of past noncompliance when dates of noncompliance CANNOT be determined at a S/S of "G" or above or SOC findings at a S/S of "F". Per instance 3 CMPs range from $1,000 to $10,000 per instance of noncompliance. While multiple per instance CMPs can be imposed for deficiencies identified during a survey, the total amount of the CMP imposed for a survey cannot exceed $10,000. NOTE: The PD and the P1 CMP cannot be used simultaneously during a specific survey (i.e., standard, revisit, complaint), but both types of CMPs may be used during a noncompliance cycle if more than one survey takes place and the PD CMP was not the CMP initially imposed. However, when a PD CMP is the CMP initially imposed, a P1 CMP cannot be imposed on a subsequent survey within the same noncompliance cycle. Factors to consider when determining "a good compliance history" might include but are not limited to: The facility is not a Special Focus Facility; The facility has not had findings at a S/S of "G" or above within the past three (3) calendar years, unless they were cited as past noncompliance; The facility has a history/pattern of achieving compliance prior to or at the time of the first revisit; and/or Unlike for PD CMPs, cms does not specify a particular P1 CMP amount range for cases of immediate jeopardy. An "instance" is a single deficiency identified by the tag number used as a reference on the cms-2567 and in Appendix PP of the SOM. 21

The facility has a history/pattern of sustaining compliance with previously cited deficiencies (i.e., no repeat deficiencies). 3.3 Choosing the PD CMP Start Date A PD CMP should begin on the first day noncompliance at the cited S/S level is documented, evenjf_thatdateprecedes_thc_first_day_of the current survey unless the facility can demonstrate that it corrected the noncompliance prior to the current survey (past noncompliance). If the team cannot document the first day of noncompliance, then the CMP should start on the date the noncompliance was observed and documented at the time of the current survey. For example, a survey begins on May 1 and on that date the survey team finds evidence of immediate jeopardy. If the survey team is able to document that the immediate jeopardy began on April 1, the CMP start date is April 1. However, if the survey team is unable to document the first day of noncompliance at the immediate jeopardy level, the CMP would start on May 1. 3.4 Guidance on Determining the Dates of a PD CMP PD CMP Start Date 4 - In all possible cases, the RO analyst shall calculate the start date for the proposed CMP with the first supportable date of noncompliance, as determined by the evidence documented by surveyors in the Statement of Deficiencies (CMS form 2567). Therefore, in performing the survey and when making a recommendation for a PD CMP to CMS, the State Survey Agency must determine the earliest date for which supportable evidence shows that the noncompliant practice began. If this start date is not clearly identified and supportable, then the RO should contact the State Survey Agency to see if such a date can be determined and should document this discussion and conclusion. If the start date cannot be determined, the PD CMP would begin on the first day during the survey on which the survey team identified the noncompliant practice. PD CMP End Date - Except in cases when IJ is removed on the same date that it was identified, do not include the day on which Ii is removed, the day the sls is lowered, thereby lowering the CMP amount to another level or substantial compliance is achieved when calculating the final PD CMP. See 42 C.F.R. 488.440(h), penalties accrue until the date of correction. The RO analyst will input the resulting number of days into the CMP Analytic Tool. A CMP may not include days prior to the date of the last standard survey. 22

3.5 CMPs for Past Noncompliance Past noncompliance identified during the current survey means a deficiency citation at a specific survey data tag (F-tag or K-tag) (with a S/S at "G" or above, or SQC findings at a S/S at "F") that meets all of the following three criteria: 1. The facility was not in compliance with the specific regulatory requirement(s) (as 2. The noncompliance occurred after the exit date of the last standard (recertification) survey and before the survey (standard, complaint, or revisit) currently being conducted; and 3. There is sufficient evidence to determine that the facility corrected the noncompliance and is in substantial compliance at the time of the current survey for the specific regulatory requirement(s), as referenced by the specific F-tag or K- tag. Additional information regarding past noncompliance can be found in the State Operations Manual, Appendix P, Section E, "Determining Citations of Past Noncompliance at the Time of the Current Survey." 3.6 Required Central Office Prior Approvalfor Any Adjustment to Final Calculated CMP Amount of More than Thirty-five Percent (359,6) If the RO believes that the circumstances involved in the specific case require an adjustment to the CMP amount which was calculated using this Tool, the RO may increase or reduce the CMP by NO MORE THAN 35 percent. If the RO makes such an adjustment, in each instance, it must provide a rationale for that adjustment when completing the tool. An adjustment to the CMP is not the same thing as imposing a different CMP based on different or new deficiencies. Whenever such an adjustment is made, the analyst will annotate the tool when calculating the original CMP to explain why an adjustment was made. For a newly imposed or revised CMP within the same noncompliance cycle, a separate tool is to be completed. NOTE: If the RO believes that a calculated CMP should be adjusted by more than 35 percent, it must consult with and obtain prior approval from CMS Central Office before making the adjustment. Requests for prior approval should be sent to Akosua Ghailan. A 35 percent adjustment that the RO may make is not the same as, and does not affect, the 35 or 50 percent reductions made to the total CMP amount based on 488.436 and 488.438. The facility will receive a 35 percent reduction if it timely waives its right to an Administrative Hearing. The facility should be notified that it will receive a 50 percent reduction if all of the following conditions are met: 23

The facility must have self-reported the noncompliance to CMS or the State before it was identified by CMS or the State and before it was reported to CMS or the State by means of a complaint lodged by a person other than an official representative of the nursing home; Correction of the noncompliance must have occurred on the earlier of either 15 calendar days from the date of the self-reported circumstance or incident that later resulted in a finding of noncompliance or 10 calendar days from the date (of CMS' notice to the facility) that a CMP was impp The facility waives its right to a hearing; The noncompliance that was self-reported and corrected did not constitute a pattern of harm, widespread harm, immediate jeopardy, or result in the death of a resident; The CMP was not imposed for a repeated deficiency that was the basis of a CMP that previously received a reduction; and The facility has met mandatory reporting requirements for the incident or circumstance upon which the CMP is based as required by Federal and State law. If you have any questions regarding the memorandum, Tool or guidance, please contact Akosua Ghailan at (410) 786-8047. Effective Date: Immediately for all enforcement cases when the CMS RO determines that a CMP is an appropriate enforcement remedy. This guidance should be communicated to all RO and State Survey Agency survey, certification and enforcement staff, their managers and the State/RO training coordinators within 30 days of this memorandum. 3.7 For Training and General Examples ONLY 5 The following information provides some examples of situations in which the Departmental Appeals Board (DAB) 6 and/or the DAB Administrative Law Judges (AU5) determined that there was facility culpability. Physical Environment: 42 C.F.R. 483.70 1. Life Safety Code (LSC) and/or maintenance issues considered detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the residents. DAB CR3000 Quality of Care: 42 C.F.R. 483.25 Note this information is provided only by way of providing some examples in which the DAB found culpability in the past. 6 DAB website 24

1. Repeated failure to timely follow or clarify doctor's treatment orders (including for pressure sores). DAB 2390 and 2299 2. Repeated failure to notify doctor of significant changes. DAB 2479 and 2304 3. Repeated failure to notify physician of change which exposed resident to high likelihood of suffering grave harm. DAB 2304 and 2300 4. Repeated failure to properly assess pressure sores. DAB 2426 5. Multiple residents with severe weight loss (> 5% in a month) not detected or addressed despfte care plan. DAB 2511 6. Repeated failure to timely provide testing, care, treatment & services for residents receiving anticoagulant therapy. DAB 2411 7. Repeated failure to closely monitor resident with compromised respiratory status, or failure to have necessary oxygen equipment. DAB, 2511, 2344, 2327, and 2299 8. Failure to administer CPR to "full code" resident. DAB 2396 and 2336 9. Repeated failure to implement interventions and supervise to prevent falls for resident with history of falls. DAB 2470, 2380, and 2357 10. Repeated failure to adequately supervise resident with known choking problems to provide prompt intervention. DAB 2520 and 2192 11. Repeated failure to provide blood sugar monitoring and care as ordered as ordered by physician. DAB 2375 12. Repeated failure to supervise residents with known history of elopement. DAB 2450, 2446, 2434, and 2288 13. Repeated transfer of residents by one aide despite care plan requiring two aides for transfer. DAB CR1863 Resident Behavior and Facility Practices: 42 C.F.R. 483.13 1. Staff failure to promptly report physical, verbal or sexual abuse. DAB 2256 Quality of Life: 42 C.F.R. 483.15 1. Egregious dignity issues. DAB 2513 25