The State of the EHR and Electronic Healthcare in Canada. The Unvarnished Version November 13, 2003

Similar documents
Building a healthy legacy together. Presentation by Shelley Lipon, Executive Regional Director, Canada Health Infoway to ICTAM October 28, 2009

Benefits Evaluation Experiences at Canada Health Infoway

the BE Technical Report

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Health Management Information Systems: Computerized Provider Order Entry

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

Advancing Digital Health in Canada

What Canadians Think Do we really know?

UPDATE ON MEANINGFUL USE. HITECH Stimulus Act of 2009: CSC Point of View

National Survey on Consumers Experiences With Patient Safety and Quality Information

e-health & Portal Overview April 2009

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

Achieving HIMSS Level 7 Implications for HIM. Children s Health System of Texas

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

2017 National Survey of Canadian Nurses: Use of Digital Health Technology in Practice Final Executive Report May, 2017

1. What are the requirements for Stage 1 of the HITECH Act for CPOE to qualify for incentive payments?

HEALTHCARE TRENDS IN NORTH AMERICA ANDY TIPPET SR. MARKETING MANAGER HEALTHCARE, AMERICAS. ScanSource Smart VAR Conference August 21, 2014

The History of Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

SHRI GURU RAM RAI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE MEDICATION ERRORS

EHR for the PCMH A Doctor s Perspective. Medical Home Summit

1 Title Improving Wellness and Care Management with an Electronic Health Record System

Cultural Transformation and the Road to an ACO Lee Sacks, M.D. CEO Mark Shields, M.D., MBA Senior Medical Director

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

TELUS health space. September 10, Luc Sirois Corinne Campney

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Canada s ICT Investments in our Economic Plan. Valerie La Traverse, S&T Counsellor Canadian Embassy September 21, 2009

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION II: CLINICAL SYSTEMS REVIEW

Meaningful Use for 2014 Stag St e ag 1 Or Or Stag St e ag e 2 For Fo r 2014? Meaningful Meaningful Use: Stag St e ag e 1 1 Fo r Fo 2014

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

E-Health System and EHR. Health and Wellness Atlantic Access and Privacy Workshop June 27-28, 2005

2011 Measures 2013 Objectives Goal is to guide and support care processes and care coordination

ehealth Report for Ed Clark November 10, 2016 My Background and Context:

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

2. What is the main similarity between quality assurance and quality improvement?

UnitedHealth Center for Health Reform & Modernization September 2014

Inaugural Barbara Starfield Memorial Lecture

THE REIMBURSEMENT SHIFT: PREPARING YOUR PRACTICE FOR PATIENT-CENTERED PAYMENT REFORM. November 20, 2015

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Improving Care for the Chronically Ill. Linda Magno Director, Medicare Demonstrations

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Health System Funding Reform: Driving Change using Technology Presentation to Canadian Health Informatics Association

2011 Electronic Prescribing Incentive Program

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

s n a p s h o t The State of Health Information Technology in California: Use Among Hospitals and Long Term Care Facilities

Population Health: Physician Perspective. Kallanna Manjunath MD, FAAP, CPE Medical Director AMCH DSRIP September 24, 2015

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

U.S. Healthcare Problem

Abstract. Are eligible providers participating? AdvancedMD EHR features streamline meaningful use processes: Complete & accurate information

Review of the 10-Year Plan to Strengthen Health Care

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Use of Information Technology in Physician Practices

Periodic Health Examinations: A Rapid Economic Analysis

GE Healthcare. Meaningful Use 2014 Prep: Core Part 1. Ramsey Antoun, Training Operations Coordinator December 12, 2013

Welcome to Maccabi Healthcare Services. Varda Shalev MD MPA ISRAEL

Quanum Electronic Health Record Frequently Asked Questions

4/8/2016. Remote Monitoring & Patient Coaching. Improving Outcomes and Reducing Costs. Objectives. What is RPM?

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Updates October 2, 2012 Rick Hoover & Andy Finnegan

Care360 EHR Frequently Asked Questions

Three Year Business Plan

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

National Survey of Physician Organizations and the Management of Chronic Illness II (Independent Practice Associations)

GE Healthcare. Going beyond Meaningful Use with GE Healthcare

Ontario Shores Journey to EMRAM Stage 7. October 21, 2015

COMMUNITY HEALTH IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Preventing Medical Errors

National Patient Safety Foundation at the AMA

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

17/06/2014. echart Ambulatory Project. echart Ambulatory. Infoway Change Management Framework

Multiple Value Propositions of Health Information Exchange

Telehealth and Telemedicine

Transforming Care for Older Adults AGE DIFFERENT. Jann Dorman, Alen Vartan, Faye Sahai, and Estee Neuwirth, Phd

COMPUTERIZED PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY (CPOE)

The Why and How. Carol L. Henwood, DO, FACOFP dist.

during the EHR reporting period.

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

Definition of Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology for Hospitals Approved by the HIMSS Board of Directors April 24, 2009

Assessing Medical Technology- Are We Being Told the Truth. The Case of CPOE. David C Classen M.D., M.S. FCG and University of Utah

March Data Jam: Using Data to Prepare for the MACRA Quality Payment Program

Decision Support Project Team. Fall 2010

Transcription:

The State of the EHR and Electronic Healthcare in Canada The Unvarnished Version November 13, 2003 1

Electronic Health Record Solution Infoway s View Infoway s Definition of Electronic Health Record: An Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a secure and private lifetime record of an individual s key health history and care. It creates significant value, providing a longitudinal (i.e. cradle to grave ) view of clinical information. The record is available electronically to authorized health care providers and the individual anywhere and anytime in support of care 2

Electronic Health Record Solution Infoway s View Patient-centric, womb to tomb Patient is logically in one EHR Conceptually, EHR is the data warehouse of clinical information EHR is a combination of clinical domain repositories (e.g. PACS, Pharmacy) and data replicated from point of care systems Source: Canada Health Infoway: EHRS Blueprint 3

Electronic Health Record Solution Infoway s View Does NOT replace the operational data store for clinical applications Includes encounter information and all clinically relevant data Each EHR is a component of the larger EHR Solution (EHRS) Source: Canada Health Infoway: EHRS Blueprint 4

Electronic Health Record Solution Infoway s View Source: Canada Health Infoway: EHRS Blueprint 5

Electronic Health Record Solution Infoway s View Source: Canada Health Infoway: EHRS Blueprint 6

Electronic Health Record Solution Infoway s View 2003/04 Business Plan envisions having the basic elements of interoperable EHR solutions in place in 50% of country within six years. Availability of $1.1 Billion in investment capital $600M allocation in Feb 2003 along with expanded mandate for Telehealth development 20% ($158M) committed to 17 projects in 2002/03 Infoway s Role Strategic Investor focusing on initial investment in a solution and it s deployment Setting standards and requirements for products and outcomes Establishing success criteria Flow or withholding of funds based on status and quality of projects Business Plan available at www.infoway-inforoute.ca 7

Infoway Business Plan Six major investment programs: Telehealth $100-150 Laboratory $150-200 Diagnostic Imaging $220-280 Drug Information $185-240 (3 rd generation) Registries $80-110 Infostructure $190-260 8

Infoway has only a fraction of the money needed 3X 3,000 $ Millions 1,100 1 There is still a $ 1.5 to 2 billion gap in funding There is a need to find ways to leverage Infoway s funds beyond $1.1 billion Infoway funding as of 2003/04 Estimated requirements for pan-cdn EHR impl n 9

A Look Across Canada Slide from COACH State of Nation 10

Danish Experience Danes spend ~$20 Billion per year (8.4% of their GDP) on health services Has ~3500 GPs, 800 full time specialists, 250 part time specialists, 65 hospitals and 332 pharmacies. Over 90% of GP offices are computerized and use EMRs. Almost 90% use computers to transmit EDI messages Discharge messages Lab requests/results Referrals Prescriptions and reimbursements 40-90% of specialists use computers. 15-70% of them use EDI clinical messages (varies by county) 75% of the health care sector (>2,500 different organizations) now participate in electronic communication via Health Care Data Network 11

Danish Experience 12

Danish Experience 13

Danish Experience What are the driving forces to the physician uptake of computers Participation is voluntary Communication benefits Test results use to take 5 days, now received immediately Discharge summaries use to take 4+ weeks, now received within 1-3 days Simplified repeat medication prescribing (save time!) Peer influence Provider registries and other information Required computer use for participation in FFS after hours primary care program Adequate support and training Patient perception 14

Danish Experience Where are they going? Internet-based infrastructure for EDI, e-mail, web look-up, telemedicine etc. Development and implementation of communication to and from EPRs in hospitals Continued dissemination and quality assurance of the existing EDI communication 15

CPOE in Canada: Infoway Data It is widely accepted that real value is to be obtained only when clinicians use the technology for Physician Order Entry, Results Reporting and Decision Support Where these systems exist, the evidence is that few clinicians (especially physicians) use Order Entry Systems 100 100 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 < 75M 75M - 150M 150M - 300M > 300M Operating Budget % institutions with OE systems % reporting physician use 0 Source: Canada Health Infoway 16

CPOE in Canada: Hospital Pharmacy Survey Hospital Pharmacy in Canada Survey, 2001/2002 Hospitals with >100 beds (at least 50% acute) were surveyed regarding prescription handling and patient safety procedures: 92% off all respondents (113/123) reported use of a Medication Incident Reporting System in their facilities Use of state of the art drug management strategies varied widely Medication Incident Any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use or patient harm while the medication is in the control of the health care professional, patient or consumer. 17

CPOE in Canada: Hospital Pharmacy Survey Reporting Systems for Medication Incidents (of all respondents n=123 ) A written hospital policy requires staff to submit a report when an incident is detected 81% A written policy provides clear definitions of medication incidents to be reported 70% Incidents are reported and openly discussed by staff without fear of reprisal 76% 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Number of hospitals 18

CPOE in Canada: Hospital Pharmacy Survey Medication Incident reduction strategies (of all respondents n=123 ) There is a designated list of dangerous abbreviations that are not accepted 23% A hospital policy providing nurses/pharmacists the right to refuse to act on a physician order on basis of patient safty 53% Bar coding is used in the medication system 13% 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Number of hospitals 19

CPOE in Canada: Hospital Pharmacy Survey Availability of Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems (CPOE) (of all respondents n=123 ) Operational 7.3% Approved to implement 13.8% Out of 9 hospitals with operational CPOE systems 3 were interfaced with pharmacy information systems 3 were integrated with computerized clinical decision support systems 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Number of hospitals 20

The Case for the EHR Public attitudes Evidence of quality problems Fiscal challenges Professional demographics Service gap with other industries 21

Public Attitudes to Electronic Health Records Unpublished private polling data collected in May 2003 Random sample of 2006 Canadians, aged 16 and over Shows very strong support for EHR across the country 22

Extent health care system needs to change To what extent do you think Canada s health care system needs to change?. on a 7-point scale 100 75 50 28 36 28 25 2 6 0 Not at all (1) (2-3) Somewhat (4) (5-6) A great deal (7) 23

Mistakes in Patient Information Serious mistakes do occur due to health care professionals incorrectly diagnosing/treating a patient because they have... patient information that is:..incomplete.. 4 15 22 59..illegible.. 9 19 21 50..innacurate.. 5 20 26 49 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% DK/NR Disagree Neither Agree 24

Emphasis on technology, move in right or wrong direction Would you say that the greater emphasis on the use of information technology in areas of Canadians personal health records is a move in the right or wrong direction? Right direction 82 Wrong direction 11 Neither 5 DK/NR 2 0 25 50 75 100 25

Support for Electronic Health Records Do you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose or strongly oppose the development of EHR? 100 75 85% 50 44 41 25 6 7 2 0 Strongly oppose Somewhat oppose Somewhat support Strongly support DK/NR 26

Reasons for opposition What is the main reason you would oppose the development of electronic health records? Confidentiality/privacy 54 Safety of information 31 No need Other 4 2 DK/NR 9 0 25 50 75 100 27

EHR v. paper-based systems How would an electronic health record compare to a paper based system when it comes to the effectiveness for...patients 24 13 81..the health care system 24 13 81 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% DK/NR Worse (1-3) Same (4) Better (5-7) 28

Concern with types of information in EHR How concerned would you be with being in an EHR? information on any mental health history 33 18 18 15 16 information on any sexually transmitted diseases 39 15 17 14 14 personal information as your name, address and age 41 18 16 13 11 basic health information as your weight, blood pressure, blood type 53 17 13 9 7 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Not at all concerned (1) ( 2-3 ) Moderately concerned (4) ( 5-6 ) Extremely concerned (7) 29

Concern with who has access to EHR How concerned would you be with having access to your EHR? youremployer 14 7 14 24 37 16 government officials in health departments 13 20 21 29 health care professionals in a hospital while they are providing care to you 64 17 7 7 6 your family doctor 76 11 5 4 3 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Not at all concerned (1) ( 2-3 ) Moderately concerned (4) ( 5-6 ) Extremely concerned (7) 30

Patient Safety: A New Issue (or an old issue newly recognized) Quality problems abound: Gaps in care Poor coordination between primary care and specialty care Increasing evidence of treatment errors Need for evidence-based practice Little incentive to preserve health To Err is Human, Building a Safer Health System (Report from U.S. Institute of Medicine, 2000) Up to 98,000 deaths each year in U.S. due to medical errors National Steering Committee on Patient Safety - Royal College of Physicians and surgeons Federal government allocated $10M per year for five years to create and operate a Patient Safety Institute Research Study now being conducted through Univ. of Toronto (Ross Baker and others) Report to be published in Spring 2004 31

Whipple Procedures: Mortality Rate vs. Case Volume, 1997-98 30.0% 25.0% Scarborough Grace Case Fatality Rate 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% Oshawa Peel SM H Etobicoke TEGH NYGH St. Joseph's MSH M issisauga Sunnybrook Scarb. Gen. Wellesley 0 50 100 150 200 250 Number of Procedures UHN 32

Quality of care: US Data Rand Corporation study: The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States Elizabeth A. McGlynn Ph.D. et al. New England Journal of Medicine 2003;348:2635-45 33

Quality of care: US Data Overall, participants received only 54.9% of the recommended care. Random sample of 6712 adults from 12 metropolitan areas of US Performance on 439 indicators of quality of care for 30 acute and chronic conditions as well as preventive care 34

Quality of care: US Data Adherence to Quality Indicators, according to Type of Care and Function Preventive Acute Chronic 54.9 53.5 56.1 TYPE OF CARE 0 25 50 75 100 Screening Diagnosis Treatment Follow-up 52.2 55.7 57.5 58.5 FUNCTION 0 25 50 75 100 % of Recommended Care Received 35

Quality of care: US Data Adherence to Quality Indicators, according to condition Breast Cancer Prenatal Care Coronary Artery Disease Hypertension 75.7 73 68 64.7 COPD 58 Hyperlipidemia Diabetes Mellitus 48.6 45.4 Alcohol Dependence 10.5 0 25 50 75 100 % of Recommended Care Received 36

Quality of care: US Data CONCLUSIONS Deficits in adherence to recommended processes for basic care pose serious threats to the health of the American public Strategies to reduce these deficiencies Availability of information on performance at all levels Focus on automating entry and retrieval of key data for clinical decision making and for the measurement and reporting of quality 37

Govt. Health Expenditure in Canada (1975-76 to 2003-04) ($ billions) 90 80 70 Cur r ent Dol l ar s Constant Dol l ar s (1997) 60 50 40 30 F O R E C A S T 20 10 0 1975-76 1979-80 1983-84 1987-88 1991-92 1995-96 1999-00 2003-04 Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information; Statistics Canada Year 38

Govt. Health Expenditure per Capita in Canada (1975-76 to 2003-04) In constant 1997 Dollars $ 2,400 $ 2,200 $ 2,000 $ 1,800 $ 1,600 $ 1,400 Heal th Expendi tur e per Capi ta Linear (1993-94 Trend) F O R E C A S T $ 1,200 $ 1,000 1975-76 1979-80 1983-84 1987-88 1991-92 1995-96 1999-00 2003-04 Year Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information; Statistics Canada 39

Govt. Health Expenditure in Canada as a proportion of Gross Domestic Product (1974-75 to 2003-04) (In %) 7 6 5 F O R E C A S T 4 1974-75 1978-79 1982-83 1986-87 1990-91 1994-95 1998-99 2002-03 Year Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information; Statistics Canada 40

Registered Nurses Employed in Canada by Age Group Proportion of Total Nurses 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 1993 1998 2000 2001 2002 4% 2% 0% <25 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55+ Age Group 41

Nursing Deficit in Canada Projected to 2011 0 Shortage of Nurses -40,000-80,000-120,000 Low Growth Med Growth High Growth Demand for Nursing Services 42

Number of Physicians per 1,000 Population in Ontario 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.71 1.57 1.45 1.34 33% decrease in 25 years 1.22 1.14 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018 2021 43

Imagine: A Bank managed by a Health Administrator The teller writes your transactions into a paper ledger You are told that you can get your money at only one branch because that s where your records are You can use your bank card only in bank machines at your own bank (if at all) Your balance is incorrect because the teller s handwriting is illegible You are told to wait for two hours while your money is sent by taxi from head office You have to receive a paper pay cheque every two weeks which you then you have to deposit in person 44

Imagine: An Airline managed by a Health Administrator Each flight has its own booking agent that you can contact only by phone Connecting flights cannot be booked in advance once you arrive at a stopover point, you wait until there is a seat available on a connecting flight No confirmed seating you can be cancelled at any time before the flight Being handed a ticket that says AC429 yyz-yvr dec10 Q 17:45 19:45 with no further explanation Told that you cannot have access to your flight itinerary without the pilot s permission The public is not given information about in-flight mishaps because the pilot might be unfairly maligned 45

Concluding Thoughts We have a very long way to go in Canada Annual spending on information systems will have to increase dramatically before we are successful The industry drivers to automate have never been stronger It is becoming clear that you cannot provide high quality care in the absence of good information systems 46

www.courtyard-group.com Toronto Edmonton 47