CHAPTER 5 COMMAND AND CONTROL OF SAN MARITIME FORCES CONTENTS. Command and Control Hierarchy in the SANDF 71

Similar documents
CHAPTER 4 : VALUE SYSTEM AND VALUE CHAIN OVERVIEW 4.1 THE VALUE SYSTEM FOR SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL DEFENCE

PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON DEFENCE AND MILITARY VETERANS SANDF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN FY12/13

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC OPNAVINST DNS-3 11 Aug 2011

Ministry of Defence and New Zealand Defence Force: Further report on the acquisition and introduction into service of Light Armoured Vehicles

Expeditionary Force 21 Attributes

THE ESTONIAN DEFENCE FORCES

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

Chapter 13 Air and Missile Defense THE AIR THREAT AND JOINT SYNERGY

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!

SA ARMY SEMINAR 21. The Revision of the South African Defence Review and International Trends in Force Design: Implications for the SA Army

J. L. Jones General, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps

Headline Goal approved by General Affairs and External Relations Council on 17 May 2004 endorsed by the European Council of 17 and 18 June 2004

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

5 June 2018 DOCUMENT C-M(2018)0025 (DNK-OVERVIEW) NATO DEFENCE PLANNING CAPABILITY REVIEW 2017/2018 DENMARK OVERVIEW

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 1

ASSIGNMENT An element that enables a seadependent nation to project its political, economic, and military strengths seaward is known as 1-5.

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 16 June /08 COSDP 539

FUTURE U.S. NAVY AND USCG OPERATIONS IN THE ARCTIC

FINAL DECISION ON MC 48/2. A Report by the Military Committee MEASURES TO IMPLEMENT THE STRATEGIC CONCEPT

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM US ARMY AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE OPERATIONS

Strong. Secure. Engaged: Canada s New Defence Policy

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

S. ll. To provide for the improvement of the capacity of the Navy to conduct surface warfare operations and activities, and for other purposes.

National Armed Forces Law

The Royal Navy and its equipment support

AIR POWER DEFINITIONS AND TERMS

NZDF 2013/14 OUTPUT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

REQUIRED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY LEVELS FOR NAVY INSTALLATIONS AND ACTIVITIES

EVERGREEN IV: STRATEGIC NEEDS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 0HICfOI 1111 CIIIEHII "\\\ \LOI'I RAIIO'I,\ N \\ \ 1'1 'T\C:O'I, \\ASIIIM:TOI\, DC ()

The Joint Force Air Component Commander and the Integration of Offensive Cyberspace Effects

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

MCWP Counterintelligence. U.S. Marine Corps. 5 September 2000 PCN

Operation TELIC - United Kingdom Military Operations in Iraq

STATEMENT BY GENERAL RICHARD A. CODY VICE CHIEF OF STAFF UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE

OFFICER (AO) IN THE MILITARY DIVISION OF THE ORDER OF AUSTRALIA

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS FIELD MEDICAL TRAINING BATTALION Camp Lejeune, NC

Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield Cpt.instr. Ovidiu SIMULEAC

NHS Emergency Planning Guidance

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF UNITED STATES FLEET FORCES COMMAND

1st Marine Expeditionary Brigade Public Affairs Office United States Marine Corps Camp Pendleton, Calif

Delegations will find attached the declassified sections of the above-mentioned document.

CJCSI B Requirements Generation System (One Year Later)

Ratifying International Conventions on the protection of the marine environment Keeping the coasts and the main vessel routes under constant

Released under the Official Information Act 1982

THE UNITED STATES NAVAL WAR COLLEGE

Subj: REQUIRED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES AND PROJECTED OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR TACTICAL AIR CONTROL GROUPS

CHAPTER 26 OPERATIONS ROOM PERSONNEL. (MOD Sponsor: FLEET COMMANDER ACOS(W))

Secretary of the Navy Richard V. Spencer Surface Navy Association Annual Symposium Banquet Washington, DC 11 January 2017

CHAPTER 2 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS. Lieutenant-General Guy Simonds, The Canadian Military: A Profile

Frameworks for Responses to Armed Attack Situations

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

Amphibious Landings in the 21 st Century

Intentionally Blank. Logistics Support To Operations

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

PORT OF CORK COMPANY. Submission to the Department of Defence on the Green Paper on Defence

Long Term Plan Service Plan for Civil Defence & Emergency Management. As at February 2018

Engineering Operations

The Integral TNO Approach to NAVY R&D

Section 3 Counter-piracy Operations

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Sometimes different words, appropriate at different levels, all say

GAO. OVERSEAS PRESENCE More Data and Analysis Needed to Determine Whether Cost-Effective Alternatives Exist. Report to Congressional Committees

Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Executing Navy s Maritime Strategy

UAV s And Homeland Defense Now More Critical Than Ever. LCDR Troy Beshears UAV Platform Manager United States Coast Guard

VISION MISSION. Deliver and sustain a full-spectrum surface combat force.

Defense Security Cooperation Agency Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation New Dawn Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

Bending but not Broken: The USAF s Expeditionary Air Force Experience in the 21 st Century 1

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

HQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M. MCO dtd 9 Jun 00 MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES

Policy Defence and National Security. Policy highlights. Protecting our interests

OPNAVINST D N4 24 May (a) OPNAV M , Naval Ordnance Management Policy Manual

OPNAVINST DNS-3 17 Sep Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

OPNAVINST C N43 18 Jun Subj: NAVY EXPEDITIONARY TABLE OF ALLOWANCE AND ADVANCED BASE FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT POLICY

Beyond Breaking 4 th August 1982

PROFILE COMBAT SYSTEMS NAVAL SYSTEMS AEROSPACE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES LEADERS IN DEFENCE AND SECURITY INNOVATION

States Pacific Command (USPACOM). Its secondary mission is to transfer the ammunition at sea using the Modular Cargo Delivery System (MCDS).

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Continuation of Essential DoD Contractor Services During Crises

Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) first collaborative PESCO projects - Overview

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Public Affairs Qualification Course Theater Strategy

The Fifth Element and the Operating Forces are vitally linked providing the foundation that supports the MAGTF, from training through Operational

I wanted to take this opportunity to thank the Royal Thai government for. providing the venue for this conference and for making U-Taphao airbase

DEPARTMENT OF "rhe NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

The current Army operating concept is to Win in a complex

Reconsidering the Relevancy of Air Power German Air Force Development

Naval Mission Solutions

British Contingency Operations since 1945: Back to the Future. Dr Paul Latawski Department of War Studies

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL VERN CLARK, U.S. NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

MCWP Aviation Logistics. U.S. Marine Corps PCN

A FUTURE MARITIME CONFLICT

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

AIR FORCE CYBER COMMAND STRATEGIC VISION

Banyan Analytics is an institute founded by Analytic Services Inc. that aids the U.S. Government with the implementation of programs and initiatives

Annual Report 2015 Japan's Actions against Piracy off the Coast of Somalia and in the Gulf of Aden

Transcription:

70 CHAPTER 5 COMMAND AND CONTROL OF SAN MARITIME FORCES CONTENTS Introduction 71 Command and Control Hierarchy in the SANDF 71 Provision of Military Capability by the SA Navy 72 Preparation of Forces for Joint and Multi-national Operations 72 Command and Control of Joint and Multi-national Operations 72 Military Functions 75 Force Preparation in the SANDF 76 Force Preparation in the SA Navy 76 Employment and Recovery 76 Combat Capability 76 Sustainment 77 Levels of Capability 77 Directed Levels of Readiness 78 Effectiveness Model 78 Operational Cycle 78

71 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 5 COMMAND AND CONTROL OF SAN MARITIME FORCES The SANDF operates on the principle of jointness. As directed by the Minister of Defence, C SANDF commands and controls all joint and multi-national operations through CJ Ops. The Joint Operational Headquarters (CJ Ops) ensures that joint planning for operations and exercises takes place. The preparation of forces in getting them combat ready and the command and control of them during exercises and operations will be discussed in this chapter. COMMAND AND CONTROL HIERARCHY IN THE SANDF The SANDF is structured on 5 levels of Command, with the highest level, the Minister of Defence (Level 0) and the lowest being the units (Level 4). Levels 0 to 2 are policy making levels, while Levels 3 and 4 carry out the executing functions of the SANDF. Navy Office is a policy making headquarters (Level 2), while the Fleet Command, under the command of Flag Officer Fleet (FOF) (Level 3), executes the policies. These levels and the implications to the SAN are depicted on the diagrams below. Figure 6: SANDF Command Structure

72 PROVISION OF MILITARY CAPABILITY BY THE NAVY The Navy is responsible for the fighting effectiveness, efficiency, economy and morale of its personnel and forces. The Chief of the Navy (C Navy), as directed by C SANDF through CJ Ops, may also have a responsibility in peacetime, for directing and supervising any delegated activities carried out on a routine and single-service basis, including, for example, a. the maintenance of the naval elements of the strategic deterrent; b. support to the civil authorities; and c. search and rescue. The Navy provides assigned forces to CJ Ops and the former is responsible for providing administration and logistic support to its forces deployed for joint and multinational operations. If circumstances warrant, CJ Ops may appoint an officer from the Navy as the Joint Task Force Commander (JTFC) for national or multinational joint operations. PREPARATION OF FORCES FOR JOINT AND MULTI-NATIONAL OPERATIONS As directed by C SANDF, C J Ops, is responsible for the preparation of dedicated mission ready combat and support forces drawn from the four Services for the conduct of all joint and multi-national operations, to carry out specific missions or to react to specific contingencies. In particular, CJ Ops is responsible for determining the training and preparation requirements of the Joint Task Force Commanders and joint headquarters staffs earmarked to command and control such missions. This includes determining the needs for all forms of formal classroom training as well as exercises covering all aspects of joint and multi-national operations. The process for the provision of assets and the planning for an operation is depicted in the following diagram.

73 Figure 7: Planning Process for an Operation COMMAND AND CONTROL OF JOINT AND MULTI-NATIONAL OPERATIONS CJ Ops is responsible for directing and co-ordinating the joint planning process and for submitting the joint plans to C SANDF for approval. Once plans are approved, CJ Ops, in collaboration with those involved in the planning process, issues the necessary directives, orders and instructions to conduct joint or multi-national exercises to practise the implementation of the plans for each contingency or, in the case of a crisis, to conduct actual operations. A planning session during a joint exercise

74 As required, forces from the four Services will be assigned under the Operational Command of a Joint Task Force Commander to conduct any joint exercises or operations approved by C SANDF. In the case of multi-national exercises or operations conducted under the auspices of the UN, AU, SADC or other regional authority, SANDF forces will be assigned under the Operational Control of a Combined Force Commander appointed by the authority concerned. Helicopters are a very effective means of transporting personnel from ships to the land operation during joint operations When deployed on a mission, the naval task force will be organised and commanded in the traditional naval manner. A task force is divided into task groups. The ships within the task group are divided, according to their type, into task units and task elements. Each individual ship is a task element and task elements of the same type, form a task unit. Different task units form the task group. This method of division ensures that ship types operate together and that each ship s commander reports to a single unit commander who, in turn, reports to the task group commander who reports to the task force commander. The chain of command is clear and streamlined. The breakdown is depicted in the following diagram.

75 Figure 8: Example of a Task Organisation Common Superior CTF 15 CTF 34 CTF 123 CTG 34.1 CTG 34.2 CTG 34.3 CTU 34.2.1 CTU 34.2.2 CTU 34.2.3 CTU 34.3.4 CTE 34.2.3.1 CTE 34.2.3.2 THE MILITARY FUNCTIONS Military capability is exercised through four basic functions: a. Preparation of forces. b. Employment of forces and recovery. c. The provision of combat capability during an operation. d. Sustainment. These functions are exercised in any scale or type of operation, but the relationship between them will vary to suit the circumstances. For example, in a simple, small-scale operation they might have a straight-forward sequential relationship. Preparation would be followed by deployment for a finite mission, embracing combat capability and sustainment, completing with recovery. However, in a more complex operation, or when there is more than one simultaneous operation, all activities are likely to be in play at the same time. The relationship is dictated by strategic direction, which gives

76 shape and purpose to each operation. The individual functions are discussed in the following paragraphs. Force Preparation. Force Preparation is the process of providing suitably trained and equipped forces and their means of deployment, sustainment and recovery to meet all current and potential future tasks, within required readiness and preparation times. It must take into account any requirement to cater for concurrent operations and tasks, plus the need for timely recuperation to meet possible future tasks. It also embraces the regeneration and reconstitution necessary to meet a major conflict, such as limited war, and the long term development of capability to meet changing circumstances. Doctrine and training give cohesion to a force and bring it to a state of preparedness. The implementation of this doctrine in the SAN is described below. Force Preparation in the SAN. C Navy is the Force Provider of forces to CJ Ops and Flag Officer Fleet (FOF) is responsible for Force Preparation. FOF is the Operating Authority for all naval forces involved in Force Preparation. Force Preparation includes individual ship workups, type workups and Fleet Workups and exercises which may also require operating with the conduct of operations and joint exercises. Other Services. Worked up ships are provided by C Navy to CJ Ops for Part of the SA Navy s surface combatants exercising with the Logistic Supply Ship, SAS DRAKENSBERG Employment and Recovery. Once generated, a task force must be capable of being employed and supported within an area of operations. It may need to be redeployed within the area of operations, or to another area, to meet new operational objectives. Once it has achieved its purpose it must be recovered to its home base to recuperate. Combat Capability. Combat capability is the ability of a force, which has been prepared, deployed and sustained, to undertake its mission in the area of operations. In most circumstances this will be the ability to defeat or disrupt enemy forces. The

term also covers the capability of the armed forces on non-belligerent operations. 77 Sustainment. Sustainment is the process of enabling a task force to maintain the necessary combat capability to achieve its objectives. It embraces all aspects of sustaining the manpower, equipment and stores which enable a force to complete its mission. It includes the endurance to maintain an operational commitment for a protracted period if necessary. This might require reinforcement and/or rotation of units and the regeneration and deployment of other units. Other elements of combat capability are essential to all types of military operations and they are encompassed in the C4I2SR concept (Command Control, Communications, Computers, Infrastructure, Information, Surveillance and Reconnaissance). LEVELS OF CAPABILITY A Force Structure Element (FSE) can be held at differing levels of capability, defined briefly as follows, a. No Level of Capability (NLOC). This is applicable when an FSE is not required to achieve a level of capability as a result of decommissioning, commissioning, or refit. b. Safety Level of Capability (SLOC). SLOC is the lowest level of capability from which an FSE can transition. Typically, a vessel would be at SLOC subsequent to a decommissioning, commissioning, or refit. c. Basic Level of Capability (BLOC). An FSE in BLOC, while not combat ready, will be regarded as sea going for given specified tasks. Such tasks will typically include multi-ship and joint training evolutions and/or work-up training. d. Functional Level of Capability (FLOC). FLOC is a state of Combat Readiness the level of capability for force structure and preparedness from which a force element can attain OLOC for performing its Missionrelated tasks within a specified Response Time. It is the level of capability that most force elements hold on a routine basis. e. Operational Level of Capability (OLOC). OLOC is a state of Mission Readiness the level of capability for force structure and preparedness that an FSE needs to have achieved in order to undertake its specified military tasks as indicated in the associated missions and other pertinent operational orders. Attaining OLOC for a specified mission entails high cost, as also a high proficiency decay rate. Thus, OLOC shall only be ordered for specific assets for specific Missions.

78 Directed Levels of Readiness. It is not practical to keep all ships at the highest readiness levels at all times. Navy Office, therefore, determines the readiness levels (personnel, technical and logistical) at which the Fleet Command is to keep the ships. The notice at which the ships are to be kept in order to work up to conduct specific operations for CJ Ops is also determined by the Navy Office, in conjunction with the requirements of CJ Ops. This is the Directed Level of Capability. Effectiveness Model. The SA Navy uses a management tool (Effectiveness Model) that takes into consideration the status of the ships equipment, personnel and logistics to determine their effectiveness in terms of their availability, dependability and reliability to be able conduct their assigned missions. Operational Cycle. As ships come out of their maintenance periods (refits and Docking and Essential Defects), they are subjected to different evaluations by the Operational Sea Training Team (OSTT). The successful completion of an evaluation increases the ship s readiness level, as described above and depicted in the diagram below. A Strike Craft exercising with a harbour patrol boat during work-up training

79 Figure 9: Level of Capabilities Maintenance Period Ship at No Level of Capability (NLOC) Safety Evaluation BLOC Evaluation SLOC Evaluation. Ship s Company is capable of coping with emergencies alongside. Ship is at the Safety Level of Capability (SLOC) FLOC Evaluation Ship s Company is Capable of coping with emergencies at Sea. Ship is at the Basic Level of Capability (BLOC) Ship is operational and is at the Functional Level of Capability (FLOC). CONCLUSION A well established Command and Control process in the operational environment will enhance the effectiveness of a joint force conducting operations. The principle of

80 involving all the role players at an early stage in the planning process will ensure that the SA Navy contributes effectively to a joint operation. Good joint planning, command and control processes and the correct application of naval concepts described earlier will ensure that mission-trained and logistically supported SA Navy forces will conduct their operations successfully. The doctrine for providing the focused personnel training and the required logistic support is explained in the Chapters 6 and 7.