OUR APPROACH TO RTT DATA QUALITY AND VALIDATION PROGRAMMES. Barry Mulholland (MBI) Philip Calvert (MBI) Seeni Naidu (BHRUT)

Similar documents
RTT Assurance Paper. 1. Introduction. 2. Background. 3. Waiting List Management for Elective Care. a. Planning

18 Weeks Referral to Treatment (RTT) Standard Recovery Planning and Assurance Framework

Reducing Elective Waits: Delivering 18 week pathways for patients. Programme Director NHS Elect Caroline Dove.

Committee is requested to action as follows: Richard Walker. Dylan Williams

Referral to Treatment (RTT) Validation and Assurance Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Contents

Performance. Improvement in Scheduled Care Waiting List Management TOOLKIT. An Roinn Sláinte DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. January 2013

EAST KENT HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

NHS. Top tips to overcome the challenge of commissioning diagnostic services. NHS Improvement - Diagnostics. NHS Improvement Diagnostics CANCER

Author: Kelvin Grabham, Associate Director of Performance & Information

REFERRAL TO TREATMENT ACCESS POLICY

WAITING TIMES 1. PURPOSE

How to write and review an access policy in line with best practice for referral to treatment and cancer pathways. July 2018

Aligning the Publication of Performance Data: Outcome of Consultation

Rapid improvement guide to appointment slot issues

SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT TO THE TRUST BOARD HELD ON 18 NOVEMBER 2015

RTT Recovery Planning and Trajectory Development: A Cambridge Tale

Access, Booking and Choice Policy and Operational Procedures

NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL NHS TRUST. PATIENT ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICY (Previously known as Waiting List Management Policy) Documentation Control

Diagnostics FAQs. Frequently Asked Questions on completing the Diagnostic Waiting Times & Activity monthly data collection

PATIENT ACCESS POLICY

Document Management Section (if applicable) Previous policy number NA Previous version

Managing Waiting Lists and Handling Referrals Nickie Yates, Head of Information & Contracting

Implementation of the right to access services within maximum waiting times

BSUH INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE REPORT. 1) Responsive Domain 2) Safe Domain 3) Effective Domain 4) Caring Domain 5) Well Led Domain

18 Weeks Referral to Treatment Guidance (Access Policy)

SWH Patient Access Policy

Newham Borough Summary report

SCHEDULE 2 THE SERVICES

Ambulatory emergency care Reimbursement under the national tariff

Quick Reference Sheet for Elective Access Policy: EDM006 V5.1

BOLTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. expansion and upgrade of women s and children s units was completed in 2011.

Summary two year operating plan 2017/18

Appendix 1: Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group Risk Register and Board Assurance Framework - 9th April 2013

Pathology Quality Review : Outcomes and Update

National Waiting List Management Protocol

2. Audience The audience for this document is the London NHS Commissioner MCA Steering Board.

NHS Wales Delivery Framework 2011/12 1

Elective Access Policy

Quality Account Delivering Gold Standard Healthcare

PATIENT ACCESS POLICY (ELECTIVE CARE) UHB 033 Version No: 1 Previous Trust / LHB Ref No: Senior Manager, Performance and Compliance.

Mental Health Crisis Pathway Analysis

Local Health Economy Elective Care Access Policy

Delivering the Five Year Forward View. through Business Intelligence

The non-executive director s guide to NHS data Part one: Hospital activity, data sets and performance

An Information Strategy for the modern NHS and relevance to the health system context of the Russian Federation

Redesign of Front Door

Integrated Intelligence and system modelling in Kent

Delivering cancer waiting times. A good practice guide

2017/18 Trust Balanced Scorecard

EXECUTIVE MEDICAL DIRECTOR JOB DESCRIPTION. Medical Education Leads Clinical Directors (professional leadership) Director of Clinical Audit

Quality and Safety Strategy

Appendix A: University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Draft Action Plan in Response to CQC Recommendations

Quality and Governance Committee. Terms of Reference

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes. A guide from NatPaCT

Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board

Preparing to implement mental health access and waiting time standards

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes

NHS Equality Delivery System for Isle of Wight NHS Trust. Interim baseline assessment against the

Quality Assurance Committee Annual Report April 2017 March 2018

Newham Borough Summary report

Measuring and monitoring quality in mental health: preparing to implement the new access & waiting time standards

Patient Access to Treatment. Policy and Procedure (RTT 18 weeks)

X For Information Decision Other

BNSSG Elective Care Access Policy

Referral to Treatment (RTT) Access Policy

Summarise the Impact of the Health Board Report Equality and diversity

Delivering Improvement in Practice

A Step-by-Step Guide to Tackling your Challenges

Report on actions you plan to take to meet CQC essential standards

Lean service redesign in GI: with productive outpatients

Performance and Quality Report Sean Morgan Director of Performance and Delivery Mary Hopper Director of Quality Dino Pardhanani, Clinical Director

Agency and NHS Improvement

Quality Account 2016/2017

Patient Access Policy

2Paper 2. Advanced nursing practice

05/04/2016. Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy 2015 GRS Census Analysis of Responses

Quality and Efficiency Support Team (QuEST) Directorate for Health Workforce and Performance

Shaping the future CQC s strategy for 2016 to 2021

Review of Clinical Coding Cardiff and Vale University Health Board. Issued: October 2014 Document reference: 456A2014

Mortality Report Learning from Deaths. Quarter

Policy for Patient Access

Medicines Governance Service to Care Homes (Care Home Service)

Early Intervention in Psychosis Preparedness in the North of England

QUALITY ACCOUNT 2016/2017 TOGETHER DELIVERING EXCELLENCE IN HEALTHCARE

Outpatient Services Improvement September 2010

S.S.T.S. Adult Inpatient Workload Tool

Utilisation Management

Date Completed 23 April 2015 Final Document. Policy Approval Group Approval. Date Approved 23 March 2015 Other Specialist committee(s) recommending

The 18-week wait programme

Board of Directors. Approval Discussion Information Assurance

PATIENT ACCESS POLICY & USER MANUAL

NHSi June 2016)and integrated business plan completed (submitted to TDA in February 2014) NHSi Plan submitted 2016.

Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Access Policy

Preparing to implement the new access and waiting time standard for early intervention in psychosis

WAITING TIMES AND ACCESS TARGETS

Please indicate: For Decision For Information For Discussion X Executive Summary Summary

Performance and Delivery/ Chief Nurse

Status: Information Discussion Assurance Approval. Claire Gorzanski, Head of Clinical Effectiveness

SCHEDULE 2 THE SERVICES

CLINICAL SERVICES OVERVIEW

Transcription:

OUR APPROACH TO RTT DATA QUALITY AND VALIDATION PROGRAMMES Barry Mulholland (MBI) Philip Calvert (MBI) Seeni Naidu (BHRUT)

BACKGROUND CQC Quality Report 2 July 2015 Over 120,000 RTT pathways. No confidence what was real or if 120,000 were the correct / incorrect. Poor data quality and information systems Ongoing structural misalignment between demand and capacity Limited operational capability of waiting list management Insufficient and inexperienced operational managers Disempowerment of clinical body

DATA QUALITY WHERE SHOULD WE START? One of the most common questions we are asked is where to begin when facing something on this scale. Needs to be an understanding that no current PAS system can handle waiting list management: Poorly understood by system suppliers Complex Too many manual processes in place at different Trusts Data Quality 50% to do with IT systems and 50% to do with hygiene (human) factors around the IT

First place to start is with each waiting list coding (this bit is often left out) How can you plan anything until you are 100% sure the waiting lists are being correctly produced? Often poorly documented Often historic coding in place and relevant staff have left Often requires external expertise

WAITING LIST CODE TO CHECK? First place to start is with each waiting list code (this bit is often left out) Q. How many different waiting lists need to be checked?

First place to start is with each waiting list code (this bit is often left out) Non-admitted Admitted Planned Diagnostic Radiology Endoscopy Long-term follow-ups / active monitoring Others?

IT SYSTEMS WHAT ARE WE LOOKING FOR? That we understand each line of code and what it is for. Anything that is being excluded from the waiting list and why.

IT SYSTEMS EXCLUSIONS Good Exclusions Bad Exclusions

Good Exclusions Obstetrics and midwifery pathways treatment function codes 501, 560; Planned patients admission method 13; Referrals to services which are not consultant-led; Non-English commissioners; GUM this is no longer commissioned by the NHS and must be excluded; Direct Access; Emergency activity; Duplicate records; Bad Exclusions Specific clinics; Based on age; Diagnostics; Cancers; Based on previous referral specialty. If referred in under specially A but previously seen within B; Based on the time since the last referral in that specialty; Based on the number of attendances; Diagnostic patients referred from another hospital;

IT SYSTEMS USER ERRORS No matter how much training you do users will always make mistakes. Trick is to anticipate and track these. Q. What are the most common errors made by users in your organisations?

IT SYSTEMS USER ERRORS: OUR TOP 12 1. Clock stops at first appointment per specialty for the last 12 months; 2. C2C referrals generating new pathways; 3. Ward discharges generating new RTT pathways; 4. Previous Outcome DNA with no future appointment booked; 5. Previous outcome Discharge with no future appointment booked; 6. Duplicate registrations in the same specialty; 7. On a planned WL with an open RTT clock; 8. TCI dates in the past; 9. Unknown clock starts; 10. Code 98 s & 99 s; 11. Patients on active monitoring who have not had an appointment in the last six months or an appointment booked in the next six months; 12. Unoutcomed clinic appointments > 24 hours;

HYGIENE FACTORS WHERE SHOULD WE START? As, if not more important than the IT systems

HYGIENE FACTORS OUTCOME FORMS Redesign Communications Clinical Ownership Launch Floorwalkers Tracking Feedback Loop

HYGIENE FACTORS CHRONOLOGICAL BOOKING Central booking office needs to be a focus Often some big departments outside of central booking Booking follow-ups and the role of the medical secretary Clinical booking often a challenge Think radically: mywaitingtime.com

HYGIENE FACTORS REPORTING Data Quality Dashboards

Management Information

HYGIENE FACTORS GOVERNANCE Critical that this process is enforced by the Executive Team Expectations and accountability need to be clear. Specialty PTL meetings should be patientfocussed and mirror the agenda of PIG Clear agenda which does not change with attendance mandatory

HYGIENE FACTORS TRAINING Using Toolkits RTT compliance toolkits will baseline training and development priorities; Capacity & Demand schedules will identify training needs; Toolkits are training products that can be held by all staff. Identify Key Staff Workforce classification and core training requirements; Link to re-validation and CEA awards; Appraisal sign-off. Tailored Programmes Key staff in operational roles will require individual programmes; REC members; Board Members; Non-Execs; Clinical Staff. Trustwide experts Capacity-Demand Experts; Policy and Rules for RTT; Pathway standards; Performance Triggers. Formation of an Expert Group reporting into FPI Committee.

HYGIENE FACTORS VALIDATION Pre 2013 2013 - May 15 May 15 - Oct 16 July 16- Current In house validation team In Source Group Cymbio In house validation team Director of Finance Head of Information Programme Director Data Quality Improvement IM & T Programme Director 1 WTE Band 7 Service Delivery Manager 1 WTE Band 6: Quality Systems Coordinator and internal auditor 3 WTE Band 5 Team Leaders 17.2 WTE Band 4 Validators

Patient Tracker Lists (PTLs) Medway front end (user entry) Excel PTL reports (user interaction) Validations Pre June 2016 Front-end database Various views including PTL view Business Intelligence database PTL scripts database

Automated web-based work flow

Intelligent Validation Database Pre populated errors and next actions Allows capture of patient factors Choice, co-operation, complexity Integrated audit and automated reporting Version controlled document management system Internal audit tool Integrated performance management tool Integrated root cause analysis tool

Intelligent Validation Database Predicts patient breaches; Report filtered by : WEEKS WAIT, Specialty, Validation status Report grouped by : Pathway status Drill down to patient level Export to Excel, word and pdf

Fully Paperless Solution Patient tracking entry from this page Patient validation entry from this page Export RAG rated patient breach possibility Future OP or IP appointment within breach time etc Fully paperless management of VALIDATION AND TRACKING

RTT DATA QUALITY STRATEGY 2017-19 Elimination of waste Validation Tracking Validation Tracking Validation of every pathway within the PTL by 31 March 2018 Audit 5 % of all validations 20% of clock stops audit Validate illogical pathways as they appear RTT Data Quality Accreditation: ISO 8000-8: 2015 Information and Data Quality: Concepts and Measuring All appropriate staff within BHRUT to be trained in RTT rules by 31 March 2018

Barry Mulholland barrymulholland@mbihealthgroup.com 07729456040 Philip Calvert philipcalvert@mbihealthgroup.com 07548060419 Seeni Naidu Seeni.Naidu@bhrhospitals.nhs.uk.