Policy on Development Cost Sharing

Similar documents
Request for Proposal Engineering Consultant for City of Ingleside

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

STANDARD DRAWINGS INDEX

Private Gas Well Policy and Incentive Program

FEDERAL GAS TAX FUND (FGTF)

PROCEDURAL MEMORANDUM Acceptance of Supplemental Right-of-Way Dedication

City of Defiance Construction Management & Observation Services

Comprehensive Plan 2009

BASIC MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION GRANT (BMTG)

Mississippi Development Authority. Katrina Supplemental CDBG Funds. For. Hancock County Long Term Recovery CDBG Disaster Recovery Program

Bylaw No OFF-SITE LEVY BYLAW

City of Waterloo, Wisconsin. Request for Proposals. Municipal Engineering Services

DATE: January 16, 2018 REPORT NO. PW Chair and Members Committee of the Whole Operations and Administration

AGENDA. Council Chambers, City Hall December 2, th Street North Wednesday St. Petersburg, Florida 33701

CHAPTER House Bill No. 5013

Port of Long Beach Community Grants Program. Community Infrastructure

Section F: Committee of Adjustment: Minor Variance and Consent Applications

CONTRACT FOR THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES TO THE CITY OF AVON, OHIO

County of San Joaquin Community Infrastructure Projects. Community Infrastructure Needs in Unincorporated Areas of San Joaquin County

TITLE 47: HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER II: ILLINOIS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PART 385 FORECLOSURE PREVENTION PROGRAM

APPENDIX A PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR MINOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ST. CATHARINES

BROWNFIELDS TAX ASSISTANCE / REHABILITATION GRANT PROGRAM GUIDE

APPLICATION FOR CONNECTION TO A RURAL WATER SUPPLY SCHEME

City of Baker City Public Works Department st Street, Baker City OR /19 Sidewalk Construction Grant Application

York Mills Road Rezoning Application Refusal Report

MINUTES OF THE RAPID CITY PLANNING COMMISSION February 9, 2017

ERASE REDEVELOPMENT GRANT

Sec moves to amend H.F. No as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

I. Background. Definitions

2017 Developer Handbook

Request for Statement of Qualifications for Professional Architectural, Engineering, Staff Augmentation, And Landscape Architecture Services

COMMUNITY BLOCK PLAN INFRASTRUCTURE AND RECOMMENDED ALLOCATION

ORIGINS OF THE C PROGRAM

City of Guelph. Site Plan User Guide. Version 1

Service Authority Development Review Process and System Improvement Policy

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CITY OF DRIPPING SPRINGS, TEXAS TIRZ ARCHITECT AND LAND PLANNING SUPPORT SERVICES

LICENSING GUIDE FOR OPERATORS OF WASTEWATER FACILITIES. Licensing of Sewage Works Operators, O. Reg. 129/04

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

Land Ambulance Service Certification Standards

E. 144TH AVE SITE HOLLY STREET NORTH VICINITY MAP SCALE 1''=600

State of the Town 2017 In Review & A Look At 2018 & Beyond Jan 20, 2018 Presented by Grant A. Kleinhenz, IMCA-CM, Town Manager

LAND PARTNERSHIPS GRANT PROGRAM. PROGRAM GUIDELINES April 2018

April 13, 2007 SUBJECT: GEOMETRIC IMPROVEMENTS OF CITY CONNECTING LINKS OF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM - FISCAL YEAR 2011

F I N A L D R A F T. Capital Improvement Plan. City of Black Diamond

IC "Disaster" Sec. 1. As used in this chapter, "disaster" has the meaning set forth in IC As added by P.L , SEC.5.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) for Feasibility Study Borough of Kennett Square New Municipal Office and Police Station Joint Facility

Title 24: Housing and Urban Development

The Town will manage the project, administer funding and review project material.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1989 SESSION CHAPTER 372 SENATE BILL 372

CITY OF BUENA PARK SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN

Downtown Shoulder Area Community Improvement Plan. Investing in our Community

Bill Waste Free Ontario Act AMO Waste Diversion Portal for Municipal Staff and Elected Officials

BY-LAW NO THEREFORE the Council of the City of Ottawa enacts as follows:

4/14/2017. Green Infrastructure Funding Opportunities

SIGNIFICANT NONCOMPLIANCE OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE LIMITS... 3 NONCOMPLIANCE NOTIFICATION (NCN)... 4 NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NOV)... 4

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM

Plan of Development Review Process County of Henrico, Virginia

PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements

City of Geneva Southeast Subarea Plan. Adopted November 19, 2012 Ordinance Page 1

Request for Qualifications Professional Engineering Services

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. The City of Oneida, NY

City of Bartow Community Redevelopment Agency

COALINGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION

CITY OF TYLER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF COMMENTS

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Background Information Document

South Dakota Transportation Alternatives

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE AGENDA Wednesday July 11, :00 p.m. Town Council Chambers Page 1

CLEAN WATER WASTEWATER FUND (CWWF) APPLICATION GUIDE FOR PROJECTS For the period of 2016/17 to 2017/18*

INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAM (IGP)

Lexington s Stormwater Quality Projects Incentive Grant Program

TOWN OF GREENWICH Annual Department Operational Plan (FY )

Vanderburgh County s Qualifications to Manage a Construction Site Run-off Control Program with the County Engineer as MS4 Operator.

Florida Job Growth Grant Fund Public Infrastructure Grant Proposal

Amended Guidelines for the Small Firm Assistance Program

1. The purpose of this Program is to provide a framework for asset management of separate sanitary sewer systems to meet the following goals:

SUBCHAPTER III INDOOR RADON ABATEMENT

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 39 Environmental Review of Transportation Projects

Clean Water and Wastewater Fund. Program Guidelines

AWMEC. Alberta Water Management and Erosion Control Program. Introduction. Who May Apply? Grant Assistance

Florida Job Growth Grant Fund. Public Infrastructure Grant Proposal. Table of Contents

Genoa Township Area Road and Bridge Projects

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS HONDO, TEXAS CITY ENGINEERING SERVICES

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT

Updated August Metro State Aid Payment Guide

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PERMITS AND SERVICES DIVISION STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAMS DIVISION

2015 Legislative Update

ADAPTIVE REUSE & MOTEL REVITALIZATION GRANT PROGRAM

RICHMOND. Capital Improvement Program For Fiscal Years The Core of The Central Region. proposed CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

City of Culver City. Staff Report

CITY OF LA CENTER PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AGING AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES CHAPTER 411 DIVISION 069 LONG TERM CARE ASSESSMENT

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

Municipality of North Grenville Rideau-Sanders Community Improvement Plan (CIP) Financial Incentive Program

Community Development Block Grant Program (Up to $20 million)

Municipality of North Grenville Rideau-Sanders-Prescott Community Improvement Plan (CIP)

NC General Statutes - Chapter 90A Article 2 1

GLOBAL MARKET ACCELERATION FUND (GMAF) Program Guidelines

Transcription:

Policy on Development Cost Sharing 2016

Contents 1.0 Purpose... 3 2.0 General Principles and Criteria... 4 3.0 Definition of Terms... 6 4.0 Sanitary Sewers, Storm Sewers and Watermains... 9 5.0 Sanitary Sewer Connections, Storm Sewer Connections and Water Connections... 11 6.0 Roads and Road Connections... 12 7.0 Stormwater Management Facilities... 14 8.0 Interpretation... 14 2

1.0 Purpose The intent of this policy document is to establish a cost sharing structure between the development community and the City of Greater Sudbury for development costs not covered by the Development Charges By-law. In order for new development to proceed, it is often a requirement that certain public works, internal or external to the development, have to be constructed. The public works may include construction of roads, intersections, traffic control signals, watermains, sanitary sewers, stormwater management facilities, etc. In some cases these works will solely benefit the developer, in other cases the City and/or other developers may benefit from the works being constructed. This document is not meant to determine where services will ultimately be installed (this will be done through the Official Plan process and on case by case basis), but only how costs will be shared. Occasionally a developer may wish to carry out the work in order to advance the construction of the public works necessary for private development to proceed. In some cases the work being proposed will benefit more than his or her development. In these cases, a Cost Sharing Agreement is necessary in order to establish the City s obligations to reimburse the developer s costs in financing the construction and to establish the developer s obligation for construction. Council approval of the construction and the reimbursement must be obtained prior to the commencement of construction. It is intended that this document will be reviewed on a regular basis by the City and the Development Community to gauge its applicability and effectiveness. NOTE: This document does not support the extension of services into areas contrary to the City of Greater Sudbury Official Plan. 3

2.0 General Principles and Criteria 2.1 General Principles: Development cost sharing applications will be considered on a case by case basis and subject to Council approval, based on the following principles: a) The City recognizes that development represents an opportunity to rehabilitate, upgrade and or replace infrastructure that would otherwise fall under the City s capital programs. Since there are limited resources to apply to infrastructure upgrades in a given year, the City has an interest in cost sharing in situations where there are demonstrated gains in closing the infrastructure gap, and/or b) Cost sharing is an option in situations where there are off site deficiencies or enhanced work is desired by the City. 2.2 General Criteria a) All Development Cost Sharing applications must be approved by Council prior to the commencement of construction; b) All Development Cost Sharing applications must be submitted to the City using the application form and be accompanied by the required information, including detailed cost estimates prepared by a professional engineer; c) Upon Council approval of a cost sharing application, the City and the applicant shall enter into a Cost Sharing Agreement. Cost sharing agreements may include provisions for a third party to confirm quantities and costs. The costs associated with retaining a third party will be shared 50/50 between the City and the applicant; d) For greater clarity, all development applications are eligible to apply for cost sharing under this policy unless expressly stated otherwise by Council; e) Notwithstanding criteria (a) above, approval of development cost sharing applications totaling $250,000 or less are delegated to the General Manager of Infrastructure Services with the option of bringing them forward for Council s consideration; f) Cost sharing involving more than one land owner may be formalized using a front ending agreement; g) Development Cost Sharing agreements may include sunset clauses; 4

h) Approval of Development Cost Sharing agreements will be subject to the City portion of funding being available. Council may reprioritize capital budgets at their discretion to realize development cost sharing opportunities, and i) In situations where the proposed development will result in infrastructure improvements that benefit a larger area, applications may be assessed on a case by case basis to determine if they are development charge eligible. 5

3.0 Definition of Terms Abutting Service Shall include a service either existing or proposed that: services lands outside and inside a development, and is either located on a road allowance outside the limit of a development but abuts the development or; is located on a road allowance within the limit of a development but abuts other lands outside the development. (e.g. Section B-C on Sketch #1 & #2) Appurtenances When used in this document means an accessory to a municipal service, including structures. For example, appurtenances to a water main include but are not limited to valves, valve chambers, fire hydrants, etc. Cost For an existing service, shall be the current cost, as determined by the City, of constructing the service. For a proposed service, shall be the final cost of designing and constructing the service, as determined by the City, after the construction is complete. In cases where the City shall pay for the balance of costs associated with services, this shall only include the difference in materials and appurtenances costs. Deficient Situation When used in this document means a road, sanitary, water, storm water or other municipal service that is lacking or insufficient for the existing developed areas that it is servicing. Determination of whether a City service is deficient shall be made by the City using its applicable standards. For example a deficient water service situation includes insufficient existing fire flows and/or pressure. External Service Shall include a service, either existing or proposed, that is located outside the limit of a development but shall not include abutting service. (e.g. Section A-B on Sketch #1 & #2) 6

Internal Service Shall include a service, either existing or proposed, that is located within the limit of a development but shall not include an abutting service. (e.g. Section F-G on Sketch #1 & #2) Minimum Size Shall be as per current City of Greater Sudbury standards. Non Deficient Situation When used in this document means a road, sanitary, water, storm water or other municipal service that is fully sufficient, suitable, or fit for the existing development that it is servicing. Determination of whether a City service is deficient shall be made by the City using its applicable standards. Road Shall refer to a public thoroughfare for vehicular traffic and active transportation, which is assumed and maintained year-round by and under the jurisdiction of the City of Greater Sudbury or the Province of Ontario. Sanitary Sewer Shall refer to a sewer main and related appurtenances (i.e. lift stations, maintenance holes, test maintenance holes, etc.) for the collection and transmission of sanitary wastewater. Sanitary Sewer Connection Shall refer to a sanitary sewer service connection and related appurtenances designed in accordance with City standards. Sequential Development Shall refer to the next development which may proceed geographically for which all necessary external City service infrastructure is in place. Service Shall refer to a water main, sanitary sewer main, or storm sewer main and associated appurtenances. 7

Shared Stormwater Management Facility Shall refer to the portion of a storm sewer system, such as a storm water management pond, and related appurtenances that accommodates storm water drainage from a development and/or a City road, and may be shared with other benefitting users. Storm Sewer Shall refer to a storm sewer main and related appurtenances(i.e. maintenance holes, test maintenance holes, etc.) for the collection and transmission of uncontaminated water, storm water, drainage from land or from a watercourse or any combination thereof that is the responsibility of the City including storm sewers located within the City s road allowance or other City property. Storm Sewer Connection Shall refer to a storm sewer service connection and related appurtenances designed in accordance with City Standards Water Connection Shall refer to a water service connection and related appurtenances designed in accordance with City standards. Watermain Shall refer to a watermain system and related appurtenances such as (i.e. valves, hydrants, booster stations, etc.), designed in accordance with City standards. 8

4.0 Sanitary Sewers, Storm Sewers and Watermains 4.1 Internal Services The cost of an internal service shall be shared between the City and the Developer on the following basis: a) For an internal service that is required to service the development, the Developer shall pay for 100% of the cost (e.g. Section F-G on Sketch #1 & #2). b) For an internal service, which is not required to service the development, the City shall pay for 100% of the cost, to be recovered from future developments where applicable (e.g. Section H-I on Sketch #1). c) For an internal service, which is required to service the subdivision and external lands, the developer shall pay for 100% of the cost for the minimum size required to service the development and the City shall pay for the balance of the cost, to be recovered from future developments where applicable. (e.g. Section G-K on Sketch #1). 4.2 Abutting Services The cost of an abutting service shall be shared between the City and the Developer on the following basis: 4.2.1 Non Cost Sharing Situations a) For an abutting service, which is not required to service the development, the City shall pay for 100% of the cost to be recovered from future developments where applicable (e.g. Section A-B on Sketch #1). b) For an abutting service, which is required to service the development, but will not service other lands which are located outside the limit of the development and abut the service, the Developer shall pay for 100% of the cost. These costs shall include any required improvements to downstream systems (e.g. Section H-I on Sketch #2). 4.2.2 Cost Sharing Situations a) No Existing Deficiencies Situation In situations where abutting service which is required to service the development as well as the other lands which are located outside the limit of the development and abut the service, the City shall pay for 50% of the costs of the pipe and appurtenances to replace the existing size, the developer shall pay the 9

remainder, subject to the City having an interest in servicing the abutting lands, otherwise the developer shall pay for 100% of the cost. These costs shall include any required improvements to downstream systems (e.g. Section B-C on Sketch #1). b) Existing Deficiencies Situation In situations where there are existing servicing deficiencies the City shall pay for 50% of the total construction costs to upsize existing infrastructure and the developer shall pay the remainder. 4.3 External Services The cost of an external service shall be shared between the City and the Developer on the following basis: a) For an external service, which is required to service the development, the Developer shall pay 100% of the cost for the minimum size required to service the development and the City shall pay for the balance of the cost to be recovered from future / existing benefitting developments where applicable (e.g. Section M-L on Sketch #1). b) For an external service, which is not required to service the development, the City shall pay for 100% of the cost to be recovered from future/existing benefitting developments where applicable (e.g. Section A-B on Sketch #1). c) In situations where a new development creates a deficiency in the external system and there are no existing deficiencies, the developer shall be responsible for 100% of the cost. In situations where there is an existing deficiency; the City shall be responsible for 50% of the cost. 10

5.0 Sanitary Sewer Connections, Storm Sewer Connections and Water Connections The cost of sanitary sewer connections, storm sewer connections and/or water connections shall be shared between the City and the Developer on the following basis: 5.1 Lands Within the Development The Developer shall pay for 100% of the cost of sanitary sewer connections, storm sewer connections and/or water connections to each lot, block or building site within the development. The developer shall also be responsible for 100% of the cost of any such connections that take place off-site to service the development. 5.2 Lands External to the Development In situations where there were no existing services, the City shall pay for 100% of the cost of sanitary sewer connections, storm sewer connections and/or water connections to lands external to the development. These costs are to be recovered from the individual property owners. In situations where there are no existing deficiencies and infrastructure is being upsized to service the new development, the City shall pay for 50% of the costs of the pipe and appurtenances to replace the existing size, the developer shall pay the remainder. In situations where there are existing servicing deficiencies the City shall pay for 50% of the total construction costs to upsize existing infrastructure and the developer shall pay the remainder. 11

6.0 Roads and Road Connections The cost of roads, road connections and related structures and appurtenances shall be shared between the City and the Developer on the following basis: 6.1 Roads a) The Developer shall pay for 100% of the cost of all local roads internal to a development (e.g. Road A on Sketch #5). b) The Developer shall pay for 100% of the cost of a standard arterial or collector road internal to a development as per the applicable Greater Sudbury Standard and the City shall pay for the balance of the cost for any enhancements above the standard, unless required for solely for the development, based on an approved traffic study (e.g. Road B on Sketch 3). c) Subsections (a) & (b) above shall also apply to roads external to a development, but necessary to service the development (e.g. Road B1 on Sketch #3). In situations where there are other benefitting parties, the developer shall pay for the minimum size of road required to service the development and the City shall pay for the balance of the cost, to be recovered from future developments where applicable. d) In situations where an abutting local road, necessary to service the development, is being upgraded to an urban standard, the Developer shall pay for 50% of the cost and the City shall pay for 50% of the cost (e.g. Road C on Sketch #3). e) In cases where an abutting road is identified as a collector road in the Official Plan and needs to be upgraded, the developer shall pay 50% and the City shall pay 50% of the cost (e.g. Road D on Sketch #3). f) In situations where an existing road, external to the development, needs to be upgraded / upsized solely for the purposes of accommodating the development, the Developer shall pay for 100% of the cost (e.g. Road E on Sketch #3). g) The Developer shall be responsible for all road improvements required to provide safe and efficient access and egress to the development, including but not limited to; costs for turning lanes, tapers, traffic control measures and improvements to nearby intersections based on an approved traffic study. In all instances, the City will consider whether the improvements would otherwise fall under the City s capital programs and consider cost sharing in those situations on a case by case basis. 12

h) Notwithstanding subsections (a) to (g), in situations where a proposed road is identified as a major future road in Official Plan and creates an improvement in the existing road network, the City may consider alternative cost sharing measures on a case by case basis. 6.2 Streetlights The Developer shall pay for 100% of the costs of streetlights internal to a development or external to a development but required for the subject lands. 6.3 Sidewalks The Developer shall pay for 100% of the costs of sidewalks internal to a development or external to a development but required for the subject lands. In situations where an external side walk is extended to an existing sidewalk, the developer shall pay for 100% of the costs to a maximum of 100 metres of sidewalk. 6.4 Bike Lanes or Transit Lay-bys The Developer shall pay for 100% of the costs of bike lanes or transit lay-bys internal to a development or external to a development but required for the subject lands. 6.5 Noise Abatement Measures a) The Developer shall pay for 100% of the costs of noise abatement measures internal to a development. b) The Developer shall pay for 100% of the costs of noise abatement measures external to a development but required and related to, or mitigate impacts from, the development of the subject lands. 13

7.0 Stormwater Management Facilities The cost of stormwater management facilities shall be shared between the City and the Developer on the following basis: a) The Developer shall pay for 100% of the cost of the minimum size required to service the development and other contributing lands owned by the Developer. b) The over sizing cost shall be attributed to other contributing parties, including the City, based on flow volume. c) The City shall pay for its share of the over sizing cost proportionally based on the City s flow volume. 8.0 Interpretation Final interpretation of the policies contained in this document rests with the General Manager of Infrastructure Services for the City of Greater Sudbury. 14

EXISTING ROAD A B C E F FUTURE ROAD H I EXISTING ROAD J G EXISTING ROAD D EXISTING ROAD K EXISTING ROAD M L LEGEND L NOTE: K EXTERNAL AND ABUTTING INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCED BY THE CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY WILL BE SUBJECT TO COLLECTIONS FROM FUTURE BENEFITTING DEVELOPMENT OR LANDOWNERS. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER REQUIRED SANITARY SEWER TYPICAL EXAMPLE COST SHARING SANITARY SEWER SERVICING Sketch 1

EXISTING ROAD A 200 mm B 200 mm C EXISTING ROAD FUTURE ROAD H 200 mm 200 mm 200 mm F I 200 mm 200 mm 200 mm G 200 mm 200 mm 300 mm 300 mm D EXISTING ROAD 200 mm EXISTING ROAD E LEGEND NOTE: EXTERNAL AND ABUTTING INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCED BY THE CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY WILL BE SUBJECT TO COLLECTIONS FROM FUTURE BENEFITTING DEVELOPMENT OR LANDOWNERS. EXISTING WATERMAIN REQUIRED WATERMAIN TYPICAL EXAMPLE COST SHARING WATER SUPPLY SERVICING Sketch 2

Road A Road E Road C Road A Road B Road D Local Road B1 Collector Vacant NOTE: EXTERNAL AND ABUTTING INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCED BY THE CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY WILL BE SUBJECT TO COLLECTIONS FROM FUTURE BENEFITTING DEVELOPMENT OR LANDOWNERS. SCHEMATIC COST SHARING ROADS Sketch 3