Great expectations: The US Navy's first Fordclass aircraft carrier prepares for debut

Similar documents
Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Aircraft Carriers Enduring and Transformational

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class (CVN-21) Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Spectrum contest: RAAF boosts electronic warfare capabilities

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

Inspector General FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Navy CG(X) Cruiser Design Options: Background and Oversight Issues for Congress

Seven New Carriers (Maybe)

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Jane's Navy International. Between reefs and shoals: plotting a course for the US warship building sector

Lieutenant Commander, thank you so much. And thank you all for being here today. I

Shaking out: The future of the US Navy's surface combatant fleet

Name of Program: The Boeing Company / Apache 64 D Block III

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Navy ManTech Program. ManTech Update. Tom Hite CTC 15 October 2014

A long time ago, as a little girl, I dreamed of traveling all over the world. And often I d ask about the past Driving everyone crazy fast!

Navy LX(R) Amphibious Ship Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Maximum utility: the future of support helicopters

STATEMENT OF MS. ALLISON STILLER DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY (SHIP PROGRAMS) and

NAVAL AVIATION MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SYMPOSIUM VADM DAVID ARCHITZEL. 29 June 2011 COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND. Presented to: Presented by:

April 25, Dear Mr. Chairman:

US Navy Ships. Surface Warfare Officer First Tours

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

Future Aircraft Carrier Options. BRADLEY MARTIN MICHAEL E. McMAHON C O R P O R A T I O N

PROFILE COMBAT SYSTEMS NAVAL SYSTEMS AEROSPACE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES LEADERS IN DEFENCE AND SECURITY INNOVATION

THE FIRST AND HIGHLY SUCCESSFUL DECADE OF NUCLEAR POWER WORK AT NNS

NAVAIR Overview. 30 November 2016 NAVAIR. PRESENTED TO: Radford University. PRESENTED BY: David DeMauro / John Ross

Edited by Alfred M. Biddlecomb

End of Book Questions Chapter 2 Organization of Naval Aviation Mission and History of Naval Aviation

Here are three articles that might be of interest. A bit long, so we ll keep it to these three (and the comments on one of them).

S ea Control Squadron (VS) 21 was deactivated at NAF Atsugi,

Navy Aegis Cruiser and Destroyer Modernization: Background and Issues for Congress

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence

Ready to Profit: Corporate Beneficiaries of Congressional Add-Ons to 1. the FY 2018 Pentagon Budget

Navy LX(R) Amphibious Ship Program: Background and Issues for Congress

March 23, Sincerely, Peter R. Orszag. Honorable Roscoe G. Bartlett, Ranking Member, Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee

Navy Aegis Cruiser and Destroyer Modernization: Background and Issues for Congress

FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK

Rear Admiral Joe Carnevale

DDG 1000 Class Destroyer

Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress

Navy-Marine Corps Strike-Fighter Shortfall: Background and Options for Congress

Employing the USS HORNET MUSEUM. as an Emergency Response Center. during a major Bay Area disaster

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF VICE ADMIRAL JOHN J. DONNELLY COMMANDER NAVAL SUBMARINE FORCES

WikiLeaks Document Release

DIVISION A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION TITLE I PROCUREMENT

New Leadership for Naval Education and Training Command

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL VERN CLARK, U.S. NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

Navy Virginia (SSN-774) Class Attack Submarine Procurement: Background and Issues for Congress

Report to the Public Accounts Committee on the basis for a possible acquisition of combat aircraft. March 2009

Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress

CRS Report for Congress

RALPH W. COUSINS MIDSHIPMAN, USNA; NAVAL AVIATOR, WORLD WAR II; AIRCRAFT CARRIER SKIPPER; FOUR-STAR ADMIRAL

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE N / Gerald R Ford Class Nuc Aircraft Carrier CVN Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Große Straße Bodenwerder Tel: Mobil: Web:

Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress

Navy Columbia Class (Ohio Replacement) Ballistic Missile Submarine (SSBN[X]) Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018

CHIEF OF AIR FORCE COMMANDER S INTENT. Our Air Force Potent, Competent, Effective and Essential

The Flying Shark Prepares to Roam the Seas: Strategic pros and cons of China s aircraft carrier program

WHERE THE TEACHERS GO TO LEARN

Navy Trident Submarine Conversion (SSGN) Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Fighter/ Attack Inventory

In order to keep the continuity of the layout, the story is on the next page.

Navy Virginia (SSN-774) Class Attack Submarine Procurement: Background and Issues for Congress

Update: (12 April 2017) USNS HERSHEL "WOODY" WILLIAMS EXPEDITIONARY SEA BASE SHIP T-ESB 4

Navy LX(R) Amphibious Ship Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Freedom Variant (LCS 1) Littoral Combat Ship Launch and Handling System Lessons Learned November 2012

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910

NAVAIR Commander s Awards recognize teams for excellence

Logbook Adm. Greenert and Gen. Amos: A New Naval Era Adm. Greenert and Gen. Welsh: Breaking the Kill Chain

Navy Virginia (SSN-774) Class Attack Submarine Procurement: Background and Issues for Congress

Abstract. Presented at the 2018 ICEAA Professional Development & Training Workshop - Proactive estimating June 2018 QinetiQ 2018

RE: Alarm from an Industry Professional over Australia s Procurement of the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter.

Logbook Navy Perspective on Joint Force Interdependence Navigating Rough Seas Forging a Global Network of Navies

Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress

General Dynamics Awarded $66 Million for Planning Yard Services for DDG 51 and FFG 7 Ships

Striking the balance: US Navy weighs quality and quantity to stay ahead

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. An Analysis of the Navy s Fiscal Year 2017 Shipbuilding Plan

Navy Columbia Class (Ohio Replacement) Ballistic Missile Submarine (SSBN[X]) Program: Background and Issues for Congress

The Navy s mandate is to be where it matters,

Navy Virginia (SSN-774) Class Attack Submarine Procurement: Background and Issues for Congress

Disruption in Aerospace/Defense

Projecting power... and politics? Carriers in the Indian Ocean

For additional information or copies of this publication, visit the NAE web page at Approved for public release.

Navy Columbia Class (Ohio Replacement) Ballistic Missile Submarine (SSBN[X]) Program: Background and Issues for Congress

DIVISION A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I PROCUREMENT

Annual Defence Report 2015: The Americas

Prepared Remarks of the Honorable Ray Mabus Secretary of the Navy Purdue University 8 May 2014

Transcription:

Jane's Defence Weekly [Content preview Subscribe to IHS Jane s Defence Weekly for full article] Great expectations: The US Navy's first Fordclass aircraft carrier prepares for debut Fitted with all-electric technologies, the future USS Gerald R Ford is poised to usher in a new era in US naval air power when it is delivered in mid-2016. However, the eponymous lead ship in the US Navy's new nuclear-powered aircraft carrier class has had its share of first-in-class challenges. Grace Jean reports From a distance the US Navy's (USN's) newest nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, Gerald R Ford (CVN 78), bears a great resemblance to the deactivated USS Enterprise (CVN 65), the reactor of which is being dismantled by the Virginia-based shipyard that built and launched it in 1960 as the world's first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. However, the lead carrier of the Ford class that is replacing Enterprise boasts a host of advanced technologies that are not immediately apparent. The leap in flight deck technologies alone, from the preceding Nimitz class's legacy steam catapults and mechanised arresting gear to the Ford class's new electromagnetic aircraft launch and recovery systems, mark a generational change for naval air power - one intended to ensure that when Gerald R Ford is handed over in 2016 it can dominate the oceans just as its predecessor did when it debuted on the world's stage only a halfcentury ago. Page 1 of 9

On 17 November 2013 Huntington Ingalls Industries moved the US Navy's new construction aircraft carrier Gerald R Ford (CVN 78) to Newport News Shipbuilding's Pier 3, where it is now completing outfitting and testing ahead of handover planned in 2016. (HII) 1633852 Yet with the advancements have come problems and challenges not unusual for first-in-class warships. Cost overruns and schedule delays because of those development-related issues have plagued the lead carrier, all of which have placed pressure upon the programme as a whole. In demand Nuclear-powered aircraft carriers have remained the benchmark by which the world's navies are evaluated. For the USN in particular a formidable force of carriers has been its hallmark since the mid-20th century. In the post-cold War period the USN's fleet of 11 carriers has remained the gold standard. Page 2 of 9

Aircraft from Carrier Air Wing 8 fly in formation over the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George H W Bush (CVN 77) in the Arabian Sea on 29 April 2014. (USN) 1530376 Leading the USN's forward presence posture in key areas of the globe, aircraft carriers have come to symbolise the United States' first-strike response. For example, Nimitz-class USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) was the first coalition unit to spring into action in 2001 following the terrorist attacks of 11 September. With an ability to generate around 120 sorties a day, Nimitz-class carriers are optimised for major combat operations but can also accommodate a modified air wing that is organised for lower-end missions, such as humanitarian aid and disaster relief (HADR). To maintain the edge in power projection, the USN started planning in the mid-1990s for a successor to the Nimitz class. Officials in 2002 ultimately took the decision to acquire a replacement carrier laden with next-generation technologies, including a new nuclear reactor plant, a new electrical distribution system, an expanded flight deck fitted with an electromagnetic catapult system for launching aircraft and advanced arresting gear to recover them, and a new dual-band radar. Pursuing all of the above in a concurrent development programme on the first-in-class Gerald R Ford appears audacious in hindsight. At the time, however, it seemed only an ambitious project with ample time on the horizon plus a reawakened defence industrial base bolstered by the thenunfolding post-9/11 mission in Afghanistan and eventually the counter-insurgency campaign in Iraq. According to the USN, the Ford class is building upon the performance of the Nimitz carriers. Page 3 of 9

Aircraft from Carrier Air Wing 8 fly in formation over the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George H W Bush (CVN 77) during a photo exercise in the Arabian Sea on 29 April 2014. (USN) 1530377 In testimony before US lawmakers serving on the House Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee in November, Assistant Secretary of the Navy Sean Stackley, who oversees research, development, and acquisition, said, "The Ford [class], the first newly designed aircraft [carrier] since the Nimitz [class] more than 40 years ago, will bring a significant increase in carrier capability to the fleet: [a] 33% increase in the rate at which we launch and recover aircraft; a propulsion plant three times the electrical generating capacity [of the Nimitz class]; increased service life allowance for power, weight, and stability to enable future modernisation; increased survivability; improved combat systems; vital warfighting systems, weapons, in the basic hull design." Page 4 of 9

A small vessel transits in front of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George H W Bush (CVN 77) as it transits the Strait of Hormuz on 28 April 2014. (USN) 1530378 Rising star The USN originally awarded the Ford-class lead ship construction preparation contract in May 2004 to Northrop Grumman's shipbuilding division, which was spun off from the defence contractor in 2010, becoming Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII): a publicly traded company. Under construction at HII's Newport News Shipbuilding division, the Ford-class carriers are 101,605-tonne ships with a length of 332.8 m and a beam of 40.8 m. With a 78 m-wide flight deck, the Ford carriers can accommodate more than 75 aircraft: a mix of Lockheed Martin F-35C Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters, Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet multirole fighters, Boeing EA- 18G Growler electronic attack aircraft, Northrop Grumman E-2D Advanced Hawkeye airborne early warning aircraft, Lockheed Martin (Sikorsky) MH-60R/S multirole helicopters, and the future Unmanned Carrier-Launched Air Surveillance Strike (UCLASS) platform. The Ford-class flight deck has been designed to increase the USN's sortie generation rate by 25% and to improve weapon movement below decks. With an island that has been moved further aft and only three aircraft elevators (instead of the four lifts found on the Nimitz class), the Ford design optimises naval aviation operations. Page 5 of 9

A 6,800-kg sled is launched from the flight deck of the US Navy's new Gerald R Ford (CVN 78) nuclear-powered aircraft carrier during tests of the next-generation Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System on 5 June 2015. (HII) 1633850 On deck Page 6 of 9

The US Navy aircraft carrier Gerald R Ford (CVN 78) fitting out pierside at Huntington Ingalls Industries Newport News Shipbuilding on 10 March 2014. (HII) 1633882 HII's Newport News Shipbuilding (NNS) cut the first steel for Gerald R Ford on 11 August 2005 and laid the keel on 14 November 2009, according to IHS Jane's Fighting Ships. The carrier was launched into the James River on 17 November 2013 from NNS's Dry Dock 12, where it had been under construction since keel laying. Six tug boats helped to move the carrier to the yard's Pier 3, where outfitting of the ship's berthing areas, mess areas, and work spaces is ongoing along with testing of the ship's electrical, mechanical, and combat systems, to include EMALS and DBR arrays. USN officials on 15 May 2015 announced that 22 'no-load' test shots had been conducted on EMALS. Subsequent 'dead-load' test shots of 36,287-kg wheeled steel vessels simulating the weight of aircraft occurred in mid-2015, with EMALS launching the vessels into the James River. In early November, Gerald R Ford was more than 95% complete, with less than 450 compartments out of 2,607 to be turned over to the USN, Rolf Bartschi, the vice-president of CVN 78, construction told IHS Jane's. With the ship's company having moved on board in August, the navy is making preparations to take the carrier to sea for the first time in early 2016 for trials ahead of handover, planned for the April-May timeframe. One of the major challenges for programme managers on Gerald R Ford was with the AAG. A component of the system called the water twister, which consists of a paddle wheel sitting on the end of arresting gear engines beneath the flight deck, absorbs 70% of the load of a landing aircraft. The plates inside the water twister failed, forcing the USN and General Atomics to spend two years redesigning, manufacturing, and then testing the updated system. In March 2015 Rear Admiral Thomas Moore, programme executive officer for aircraft carriers, told reporters at the Washington Navy Yard that the AAG was the critical path to Gerald R Ford's delivery. Back to the future HII has been steadily progressing on the second Ford-class carrier, John F Kennedy, since 15 January 2009 after the initial contract was signed for construction preparation work, including acquisition of material and components. Page 7 of 9

A unit for the USN's second Ford-class nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, John F Kennedy (CVN 79), rests on the assembly platen at Huntington Ingalls Industries Newport News Shipbuilding in 2014. (HII) 1633851 John F Kennedy is a replica of lead ship Gerald R Ford, but the second-in-class carrier is expected to be fitted with a different radar, the Enterprise Air Surveillance Radar (EASR), which will replace the DBR. The EASR is meant to help reduce costs on the new construction Ford-class carriers while providing a common system for future amphibious assault ships and for backfitting onto existing Nimitz-class carriers. Senator John McCain, who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, has been a vocal critic of the Ford-class programme. At a October 2015 hearing he pointed out that cost overruns on Gerald R Ford are the result of incorporating too many new technologies onto the lead ship and he warned that the second carrier, too, could suffer from similar woes. "The story of John F Kennedy, or CVN 79, could be worse because the Department of Defense began building it before proving the new systems on CVN 78 and while continuing to make major changes to the CVN 79, including a new radar," he said. "This has made CVN 79, in essence, a second lead ship with all the associated problems." Congress has capped John F Kennedy's cost at USD11.5 billion. Rear Adm Moore said in 2015 that he expects the second carrier to be built for USD1 billion less than lead carrier Gerald R Ford via 18% fewer man-hours of construction, made possible through HII's capital improvement investments in the yard. Gerald R Ford is expected to be fully constructed in 49 million man-hours; John F Kennedy will be built in 44 million man-hours. USN shipbuilding officials have said they are aiming for another 10% reduction in the production effort Page 8 of 9

on the planned third carrier: Enterprise (CVN 80). Building CVN 80 in 40 million man-hours would help take USD500 million out of the ship's total cost, officials here said. For the full version and more content: IHS Jane's Defence Industry and Markets Intelligence Centre This analysis is taken from IHS Jane s Defence Industry & Markets Intelligence Centre, which provides world-leading analysis of commercial, industrial and technological defence developments, budget and programme forecasts, and insight into new and emerging defence markets around the world. IHS defence industry and markets news and analysis is also available within IHS Jane s Defence Weekly. To learn more and to subscribe to IHS Jane s Defence Weekly online, offline or print visit http://magazines.ihs.com/. For advertising solutions contact the IHS Jane s Advertising team Page 9 of 9