February 1, The analysis depends critically on three key factors:

Similar documents
June 25, Honorable Kent Conrad Ranking Member Committee on the Budget United States Senate Washington, DC

September 30, Honorable Kent Conrad Chairman Committee on the Budget United States Senate Washington, DC 20510

September 3, Honorable Robert C. Byrd Ranking Member Committee on Appropriations United States Senate Washington, DC

April 25, Dear Mr. Chairman:

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Report on DoD-Funded Service Contracts in Forward Areas

U.S. Forces in Afghanistan

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. Trends in Spending by the Department of Defense for Operation and Maintenance

The Ability of the U.S. Military to Sustain an Occupation in Iraq

The Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Other Global War on Terror Operations Since 9/11

CBO TESTIMONY. Statement of Douglas Holtz-Eakin Director

STATEMENT BY GENERAL RICHARD A. CODY VICE CHIEF OF STAFF UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE

Costs of Major U.S. Wars

The Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Other Global War on Terror Operations Since 9/11

IT S ALL IN THE NUMBERS. The major US Wars: a look-see at the cost in American lives and dollars. Anne Stemmerman Westwood Middle School

Federal Funding for Homeland Security. B Border and transportation security Encompasses airline

GAO. FORCE STRUCTURE Capabilities and Cost of Army Modular Force Remain Uncertain

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1200DEFENSEPENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

GAO. DEFENSE BUDGET Trends in Reserve Components Military Personnel Compensation Accounts for

Veterans Affairs: Gray Area Retirees Issues and Related Legislation

Notes Unless otherwise specified, all years referred to in this report are federal fiscal years, which run from October 1 to September 3, and are desi

GAO WARFIGHTER SUPPORT. DOD Needs to Improve Its Planning for Using Contractors to Support Future Military Operations

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

THE STATE OF THE MILITARY

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

REPLACING MILITARY PERSONNEL IN SUPPORT POSITIONS WITH CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES DECEMBER What Costs of Replacing Military Support Personnel With Civi

THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION

GAO. OVERSEAS PRESENCE More Data and Analysis Needed to Determine Whether Cost-Effective Alternatives Exist. Report to Congressional Committees

GAO CONTINGENCY CONTRACTING. DOD, State, and USAID Contracts and Contractor Personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan. Report to Congressional Committees

The forces to deploy will include: 19 Light Brigade Headquarters and Signal Squadron (209) Elements of 845 Naval Air Squadron

Report to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017

National Guard Personnel and Deployments: Fact Sheet

GAO Report on Security Force Assistance

Operation and Maintenance

National Guard Personnel and Deployments: Fact Sheet

GAO MILITARY OPERATIONS

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC MAR

GAO MILITARY OPERATIONS. DOD s Extensive Use of Logistics Support Contracts Requires Strengthened Oversight. Report to Congressional Requesters

Department of Defense

Department of Defense Contractor and Troop Levels in Iraq and Afghanistan:

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Humanitarian and Civic Assistance (HCA) Provided in Conjunction with Military Operations

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Committees

Appendix D: Restoration Budget Overview

The Honorable Strom Thurmond Chairman, Subcommittee on Criminal Justice Oversight Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate

TITLE IV MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

December 18, Congressional Committees. Subject: Overseas Contingency Operations: Funding and Cost Reporting for the Department of Defense

ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS RELATING TO TOTAL FORCE MANAGEMENT (SEC. 933)

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018

GAO DEFENSE INFRASTRUCTURE

STATEMENT OF: COLONEL MARTIN P. SCHWEITZER COMMANDER, 4 / 82 AIRBORNE BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE

Department of Defense Contractor and Troop Levels in Iraq and Afghanistan:

The Global War on Terrorism

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

Department of Defense Contractor and Troop Levels in Iraq and Afghanistan:

Dave (Sanford) always good to see you again. Ladies & Gentlemen, I m glad to be here

Lieutenant Commander, thank you so much. And thank you all for being here today. I

DOD INSTRUCTION GENERAL BONUS AUTHORITY FOR OFFICERS

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Compliance Appendix E: Compliance Budget Overview

Luke Lattanzi- Silveus 1. January 1, 2015

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FISCAL YEAR 2014 BUDGET REQUEST. Addendum A OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. May 2013

TESTIMONY OF KENNETH J. KRIEG UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY & LOGISTICS) BEFORE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 9, 2005

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, VOLUME 5, ISSUE 1,

BUDGET UNCERTAINTY AND MISSILE DEFENSE

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL WILLIAM F. MORAN U.S. NAVY VICE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATE OF THE MILITARY

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

GAO MILITARY ATTRITION. Better Screening of Enlisted Personnel Could Save DOD Millions of Dollars

THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON. February 16, 2006

The Alabama Defense Breakdown Economic Impact Report

Modernization of US Nuclear Forces: Costs in Perspective

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2001

DOD INSTRUCTION RETENTION DETERMINATIONS FOR NON-DEPLOYABLE SERVICE MEMBERS

DoD Study of Morale/QoL Study Charter. National Security Presidential Directive #2

H.R National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2005

Subj: MARINE CORPS POLICY ON ORGANIZING, TRAINING, AND EQUIPPING FOR OPERATIONS IN AN IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (IED) ENVIRONMENT

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES - FY 2004

18 Fires, July-August 2017, Expanding cross domain Fires

GAO ARMY WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Actions Needed to Reduce Carryover at Army Depots

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR IRAQ RECONSTRUCTION

Wayne County Native Promoted to Brigadier General Assumes Command of Marine Corps Systems Command in Quantico, Va.

As we close the book on one of America s longest military

GAO. DEFENSE CONTRACTOR RESTRUCTURING DOD Risks Forfeiting Savings on Fixed-Price Contracts

DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION:

GAO MILITARY BASE CLOSURES. DOD's Updated Net Savings Estimate Remains Substantial. Report to the Honorable Vic Snyder House of Representatives

LATVIA - NATIONAL REPORT 2005 POLICY CHANGES/ NEW POLICY AFFECTING WOMEN IN UNIFORM

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

ANNEX E MHAT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) Mental Health Advisory Team (MHAT) 16 December 2003

GAO MILITARY PERSONNEL. Number of Formally Reported Applications for Conscientious Objectors Is Small Relative to the Total Size of the Armed Forces

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

Q & A USERRA. The Uniformed Services Employment & Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 Revised and Restated

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

March 23, Sincerely, Peter R. Orszag. Honorable Roscoe G. Bartlett, Ranking Member, Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee

THE COMBAT CENTER. Refining excellence since 1952

UNIT AWARDS JOINT MERITORIOUS UNIT AWARD... I MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION... II ARMY SUPERIOR UNIT AWARD... III

Transcription:

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE U.S. Congress Washington, DC 20515 Honorable John M. Spratt Jr. Chairman Committee on the Budget U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Mr. Chairman: February 1, 2007 At your request, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated the cost of the President s plan to increase the number of military personnel deployed to Iraq under different scenarios related to the duration of that increase. In summary, CBO estimates that costs would range from $9 billion to $13 billion for a four-month deployment and from $20 billion to $27 billion for a 12-month deployment, depending upon the total number of troops deployed and including additional costs that would be incurred during the build-up and ramp-down periods. 1 The analysis depends critically on three key factors: How many additional troops will be deployed? How long will the deployments last? What are the additional costs associated with incremental troop deployments? Number of Additional Troops The President has announced an increase in Army and Marine Corps forces to be deployed to the Iraq theater of operations. Over the next several months, that increase will be accomplished largely by deploying troops sooner than was previously planned and by lengthening the deployment of forces already in the Iraq theater. The increase in force levels has already begun and is expected to reach its peak of about 20,000 additional combat personnel in May. www.cbo.gov 1. CBO s analysis focuses only on the costs associated with deploying ground forces in Iraq. It does not encompass the costs that will be incurred for deploying additional naval forces to the Persian Gulf.

Page 2 Thus far, the Department of Defense (DoD) has identified only combat units for deployment. However, U.S. military operations also require substantial support forces, including personnel to staff headquarters, serve as military police, and provide communications, contracting, engineering, intelligence, medical, and other services. Over the past few years, DoD s practice has been to deploy a total of about 9,500 personnel per combat brigade to the Iraq theater, including about 4,000 combat troops and about 5,500 supporting troops. DoD has not yet indicated which support units will be deployed along with the added combat forces, or how many additional troops will be involved. Army and DoD officials have indicated that it will be both possible and desirable to deploy fewer additional support units than historical practice would indicate. CBO expects that, even if the additional brigades required fewer support units than historical practice suggests, those units would still represent a significant additional number of military personnel. To reflect some of the uncertainty about the number of support troops, CBO developed its estimates on the basis of two alternative assumptions. In one scenario, CBO assumed that additional support troops would be deployed in the same proportion to combat troops that currently exists in Iraq. That approach would require about 28,000 support troops in addition to the 20,000 combat troops a total of 48,000. CBO also presents an alternative scenario that would include a smaller number of support personnel about 3,000 per combat brigade totaling about 15,000 support personnel and bringing the total additional forces to about 35,000. Length of Deployments As requested, CBO estimated costs for a number of different deployment periods, ranging from four months to two years. In each case, the period identified is the length of time that the peak force levels would be sustained. In each case, there is also a three-month period during which forces would be gradually ramped up, and a similar period following the peak during which the force levels would gradually decline.

Page 3 Cost of Increasing Forces Estimating the cost of deploying additional troops to Iraq is difficult. DoD prepares monthly reports on obligations incurred in support of the war, but those reports do not contain sufficient detail on many cost elements, nor do they include information on key factors such as personnel levels or the pace of operations. As a result, they are not very useful in developing costestimating relationships. In the absence of sufficient information from the monthly obligation reports or other sources, CBO based its estimate on appropriations provided in 2006 for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, and for the war on terrorism a total of $116 billion and subtracted from that amount the costs of activities not related to the conflict in Iraq or not likely to vary significantly as a result of changes in the number of deployed troops. In total, CBO estimates that $89 billion of the funding provided in 2006 for personnel and personnel support, equipment repair and replacement, operating support, and transportation was related to the size of the deployed forces. CBO then projected costs for operations in Iraq in future years based on changes to those forces that would occur under the scenarios specified above. Most costs would be incurred during the deployment, but some of the costs to restore or replace damaged equipment could lag the end of the deployment by a year or more. Results of CBO s Analysis If DoD deployed a total of 48,000 troops, and sustained that level for four months, costs would be about $13 billion higher than for the current force levels, CBO estimates (see the table below). The 20,000 combat forces account for $5 billion of that cost. If the higher level was maintained for 12 months, costs would be $27 billion higher than the current level $11 billion of which would fund the combat forces alone. Costs would increase by lesser amounts if the combat forces were accompanied by fewer support personnel. If additional forces totaled 35,000 troops, CBO estimates that sustaining such a deployment would cost $9 billion for four months and $20 billion for 12 months.

Page 4 ESTIMATED FUNDING REQUIRED TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF PERSONNEL DEPLOYED TO IRAQ UNDER ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS (Budget authority in billions of dollars, by fiscal year) 2007 2008 2009 Total, 2007-2009 Four-Month Peak Deployment Sustain an Additional 48,000 Troops in Iraq (20,000 Combat Troops and 28,000 Support Troops) 9 3 * 13 Sustain an Additional 35,000 Troops in Iraq (20,000 Combat Troops and 15,000 Support Troops) 7 2 * 9 Twelve-Month Peak Deployment Sustain an Additional 48,000 Troops in Iraq (20,000 Combat Troops and 28,000 Support Troops) 10 15 3 27 Sustain an Additional 35,000 Troops in Iraq (20,000 Combat Troops and 15,000 Support Troops) 7 11 2 20 Notes: * = less than $500 million. Each scenario includes the cost of a three-month buildup and a three-month withdrawal. A substantially longer deployment would cost much more. A 48,000-person increase in deployed forces sustained for 24 months would cost an estimated $49 billion; a corresponding 35,000-person increase would cost about $26 billion, CBO estimates. CBO s analysis does not incorporate any effect on federal tax revenues from an increase in the number of troops serving in combat zones, nor does it include any indirect effects on spending (from changes in veterans benefits, for example). Finally, CBO s analysis does not address the effects that sustaining such increases in deployed forces would have on military readiness and other operational considerations.

Page 5 I hope this analysis is helpful to you. If you would like additional information on this subject, we would be pleased to provide it. The CBO staff contacts for this analysis are Adam Talaber, who can be reached at 226-2900, and Matthew Schmit and David Newman, who can be reached at 226-2840. Sincerely, Peter R. Orszag Director cc: Honorable Paul Ryan Ranking Member Identical letter sent to the Honorable Ike Skelton and the Honorable Martin T. Meehan.