Reduc&on in Turnaround Times for STAT Exams in Body Imaging. Eduardo Ma:a, MD Venkateswar Surabhi, MD William Shepherd, MS

Similar documents
How to Build a Quality Infrastructure

Improving the Delivery of Troponin Results to the Emergency Department using Lean Methodology

Customer Situation Solution Benefits

Emergency Department Throughput

Begin Implementation. Train Your Team and Take Action

CME/SAM. Determination of Turnaround Time in the Clinical Laboratory

Pediatric Radiology in an Adult Community Hospital

Adopting Accountable Care An Implementation Guide for Physician Practices

University of Michigan Health System. Final Report

Publication Year: 2013

Analyzing Physician Task Allocation and Patient Flow at the Radiation Oncology Clinic. Final Report

for Critical Result Notification

Decreasing Environmental Services Response Times

Midmark White Paper Building Your Connected Point of Care Ecosystem. Point Of Care Ecosystem Series Part Four

Care You Can See TM. Value-Based Care. Use cases: Radiology in the. Value-Based Care. organization

Decreasing Lag Time for Ward Collect Lab Draws

Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Project (Example)

University of Michigan Comprehensive Stroke Center

Linking Performance to Improvement: Using a System-wide Measurement Tool. Society for Health Systems February 2005

DELIVERING OUTSTANDING IMPROVEMENTS AT CANADA S WILLIAM OSLER HEALTHCARE SYSTEM

Hardwiring Processes to Improve Patient Outcomes

Streamlining Medical Image Sharing For Continuity of Care

Proposed Standards Revisions Related to Pain Assessment and Management

Connecticut Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program

Ontario Strategy for MRI

How an ACO Provides and Arranges for the Best Patient Care Using Clinical and Operational Analytics

Laboratory Turnaround Times in Emergency Departments. Eliminating wasteful steps and bottlenecks with Lean Six Sigma

Clinical Operations. Kelvin A. Baggett, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A. SVP, Clinical Operations & Chief Medical Officer December 10, 2012

Dalton Review RCR Clinical Radiology Proposal Radiology in the UK the case for a new service model July 2014

Transformational Patient Care Redesign Project

Measure: Current State Spaghetti Diagram

Analysis of Nursing Workload in Primary Care

TWH ED ACUTE & SUBACUTE BEDS UTILIZATION PROJECT

The Power of Quality. Lindsay R. Smith, MSN,RN Quality Manager Vanderbilt Transplant Center

Strategy Guide Specialty Care Practice Assessment

Public Health Needs: Quality of Care and Sustainability an International Overview. Dr. David Jaimovich President

NUCLEAR MEDICINE RESIDENT DUTIES

Improving Access to Pediatric MR performed under General Anesthesia Benefits of a Rapid Improvement Event (RIE)

CPC+ CHANGE PACKAGE January 2017

Seven day hospital services: case study. University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Quality Management Building Blocks

Michigan Medicine--Frankel Cardiovascular Center. Determining Direct Patient Utilization Costs in the Cardiovascular Clinic.

Completing the Specialty Practice Assessment Tool: Guide for Behavioral Health Organizations and Divisions

Measuring the Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacogenomic Testing

SPC Case Studies Answers

SEPTEMBER E XIT S URVEY SURVEY REPORT. Bachelor s Degree in Nursing Program. 4

HIMSS Submission Leveraging HIT, Improving Quality & Safety

Let My Patients Flow! Patient Flow Summit 2015

USING ACUTE CARE PLANS TO IMPROVE COORDINATION AMONG ED HIGH UTILIZER PATIENTS MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL Publication Year: 2014

The ABR MOC Part IV:

Right person. device time

Partnerships- Cooperation with other care providers that is guided by open communication, trust, and shared decision-making.

Getting to Zero: A Quality Assessment of Multiple Interventions Aimed to Reduce Cancellation Rates in an Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Program

Interactive Urological Outpatient Workshop

Re: Medicare Program; Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations, Proposed rule.

Report on the Pilot Survey on Obtaining Occupational Exposure Data in Interventional Cardiology

Collaboration Between Radiology and Utilization Management to Reduce Inappropriate MRI Orders and Patient Wait Times. Problem/Goal

Changing Culture through Staff Engagement

IS YOUR QAPI COP READY?

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

Methodology. Methods

2017 QUALITY PLAN WORK PLAN. Kaiser Permanente of Washington 2017 Quality Work Plan

Using Data for Proactive Patient Population Management

Introduction RADIOLOGY ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Jumpstarting population health management

2014, Healthcare Intelligence Network

Midmark White Paper The Connected Point of Care Ecosystem: A Solid Foundation for Value-Based Care

Building a Smarter Healthcare System The IE s Role. Kristin H. Goin Service Consultant Children s Healthcare of Atlanta

Building a Lean Team. Using Lean Methodology to Develop a Collaborative Rounding Model. April 28 th, 2010

Diagnostic Breast Imaging Solution Eliminates Digital Islands and Integrates Workflow

Integrated Health System

Neurosurgery Clinic Analysis: Increasing Patient Throughput and Enhancing Patient Experience

University of Michigan Health System

Appendix 5. PCSP PCMH 2014 Crosswalk

UNC2 Practice Test. Select the correct response and jot down your rationale for choosing the answer.

Patients Experience of Emergency Admission and Discharge Seven Days a Week

Benefits Evaluation Experiences at Canada Health Infoway

A Multi-Phased Approach to Using Clinical Data to Drive Evidence-Based EMR Redesign. Kulik, Carole Marie; Foad, Wendy; Brown, Gretchen

Successfully Using Six Sigma. (6σ) to Improve Nursing Quality. Indictors. Objectives. 1. Describe how Six Sigma can be used to

Health Quality Management

Using Lean, Six Sigma to Improve Surgical Services James Pearson J.O.P. Consulting

The goal of Ontario s Wait Time Strategy launched in

LEAN Transformation Storyboard 2015 to present

ASCO s Quality Training Program

SUBJECT: EPIC, PACS/RIS Image Processing Errors Effective: 12/2003 Reviewed: 10/2013 APPROVED BY: Director of Radiology Page 1 of 5

Describe the process for implementing an OP CDI program

Report on Feasibility, Costs, and Potential Benefits of Scaling the Military Acuity Model

EMS OFFLOAD DELAY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE CROUSE HOSPITAL

Improving Hospital Performance Through Clinical Integration

Evaluating the Benefits. Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) Newfoundland and Labrador

TEAM ASSESSMENT PULL PROCESS CHILDREN S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA AT SCOTTISH RITE

The Practice Standards for Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy. Quality Management Practice Standards

Mobile Communications

JOB DESCRIPTION. Revised:1/24/2018

Manuscripts Processed. DATE: April 16, PAA Committee on Publications and Board of Directors. FROM: Pamela Smock, Editor

2017 Proposed Rule Physician Fee Schedule in the Federal Register

Ontario s Diagnostic Imaging Appropriateness Pilot Project

Paving the Way to Fruitful Payer Provider Partnerships: Building a Foundation of Trust

PSI-15 Lafayette General Health 2017 Nicholas E. Davies Enterprise Award of Excellence

SEPTEMBER O NE-YEAR S URVEY SURVEY REPORT. Master of Science in Nursing Program

Transcription:

Reduc&on in Turnaround Times for STAT Exams in Body Imaging Eduardo Ma:a, MD Venkateswar Surabhi, MD William Shepherd, MS

Overview The Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging at Memorial Hermann-TMC provides 24 hour coverage by staff and residents. " Overnight efforts are concentrated on Emergency Department patients, but preliminary reports may be posted on any exam as soon as it becomes available on PACS. " Transcribed reports, i.e. those that have been reviewed or dictated by the attending radiologists, may be available subsequently. " Similar to other institutions, the current standard for STAT radiology exams is the availability of a finalized report within four hours of the order."

Problem Statement At the time of our project, turnaround times (TAT) significantly exceeded that standard. " Exam report TAT were also highly variable, which added to the perception of exam delays. " Extended wait times for exam results frustrate ordering physicians and prolong decisions regarding treatment plans." Reasons for delay and variability in finalized report availability include variable coverage during the day, exam interpretation by resident and significant overutilization of the STAT priority (~40-50% of exams), among others."

Goals Decrease the order to transcribed TAT of body imaging STAT exams (CR, CT, US) to a median of 4 hrs. and significantly decrease process variation within six months. " Improve customer satisfaction" Primary customer: Ordering provider" Secondary customer: Patient" Use effort as model and expand scope from body imaging CR, CT and US TAT to TAT across the entire Department." Institute of Medicine Aims: Timely and Efficient"

Project Alignment Institutional goal: providing better care for the community." Operational Excellence " o o Provide extended coverage" Prioritize STAT exams" Customer Safety " o Rapid report time improves patient care" Business goals" Decrease TAT to provide for more expedient, efficient and efficacious treatment, improving pa&ent flow. Decrease indiscriminate STAT orders to decrease overu&liza&on and waste.

Team Members Eduardo Ma:a, MD Logan Boatman, MD Bill Shepherd, MS Kathy Masters, MS, RD Six Sigma Black Belt Staff and Residents in Body Imaging at Memorial Hermann- TMC

Measurements Baseline data was acquired for the 3-5/2010 period (Phase 1). " Mean, median, and standard deviation of our TAT were calculated." Observations were plotted on control charts. " After implementation of two interventions (Phases 2 and 3), data was also acquired and analyzed with similar metrics. " Statistical analyses were performed to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement." Data was similarly acquired for a period after the withdrawal of one of the interventions (Phase 4)."

Quality Tools: Fishbone CT Delays Staff, technologists and residents were surveyed regarding current delays & ways to improve workflow. " Fishbone (Ishikawa) diagrams illustrate steps between order entry (O) and finalized report (F) & reasons for potential delays."

Quality Tools: Process Map (C>T) Among many areas of potential delays, the most straightforward area to effect change was on the reading of exams (C>T)." The steps to follow from exam completion to finalized report were traced on a process map." *Due to the volume of STAT orders (~40-50%), reports were not routinely transcribed STAT unless the provider specifically called to request this.

Interven&ons Phase 1 (3-5/2010) - Baseline Phase 2 (6-8/2010) - Department- wide implementa&on of an evening/night shid for radiology a:ending physicians Redistribu&on of Staff to cover 6PM midnight (This is in addi&on to 24h coverage by the ED radiologists.) Phase 3 (9-10/2010) - Priori&za&on of STAT Exams: Resident checkout immediately following exam review Sign- out Reminders Redistribu&on of STAT exam work Phase 4 (10/2010-2/2011) - Relaxa&on of priori&za&on

Results At the baseline (Phase 1), < 25% of the exams were meeting the goal of having a report in the system within 4 hours of order. " Mean exam complete to transcribed TAT was 9.0 hrs (median 8.1 hrs). " The process was highly variable (S.D. 7.3 hrs). " The evening shift (Phase 2) and the targeted STAT exam prioritization interventions (Phase 3), significantly decreased TAT mean, median (3.0 hrs.) and variability. " By the end of both interventions, the percentage of STAT exams transcribed within 4 hrs of order almost doubled (~45%). " Withdrawal of Phase 3 reminders returned the Phase 4 TAT to what had been achieved in Phase 2.

Results Baseline C>T TAT mean and variability was analyzed using a control chart, later expanded as new data was acquired.

Results Exam Ordered to Transcribed Turnaround Time by Project Phase Project Phase Mean (hrs) Median (hrs) S.D. (hrs) Yield* Baseline 11.2 10.4 7.8 24.9% Phase 2 8.1 5.9 7.0 39.9% Phase 3 7.3 4.7 6.3 44.6% Phase 4 8.0 5.6 6.7 40.0% * Percentage of STAT exams transcribed within 4 hrs of the order. Exam Complete to Transcribed Turnaround Time by Project Phase Project Phase Mean (hrs) Median (hrs) S.D. (hrs) Baseline 9.0 8.1 7.4 Phase 2 6.1 3.2 6.6 Phase 3 5.3 2.3 5.8 Phase 4 5.9 3.0 6.2

Results Initial interventions targeted night exams, but daytime TAT and variation during the day improved as well.

Results Bi-modal distribution present during baseline much less pronounced by Phase 3.

Conclusions: Lessons Learned The evening shift significantly improves STAT TAT." Major undertaking: a full radiologist is removed from dayshift." Does not adversely affect daytime exams at this point." Prioritizing STAT exam readout and checkout improves TAT." More targeted approach." More of a zero-sum process in regards to routine exams." The impact of this change on routine exams during the day will continue to be evaluated."

Conclusions: What Worked Well Evening Shift" Decreased our TAT" Staff radiologists more available for consultation, " Decreased the time to call-back for actionable findings" Improved clinician satisfaction. " Reminders: Use of reminders in the form of text pagers twice a day had a measurable impact that, when withdrawn, reverted to its expected level. "

Next Steps Streamlining the many steps leading to exam completion (O>C). This will require engagement of technologists, nurses, transport personnel, clerks, etc." New measures, such as flags, alarms or reminders on overdue exams may help address this issue." Decrease STAT priority overutilization. Hopefully, the prospect of obtaining a timely STAT report may be incentive for more appropriate ordering." Expansion of the project to the entire Department."

New Effort Department-wide expansion has already started." Data is being analyzed in rule-based format." More closely matches customer perception during working hours." Which percent of exams meet our TAT criteria." o o Routine exams ordered before noon are to be read same day." Routine exams ordered after noon are to be read by noon next day." Radiologists not meeting goals are paged with reminders." Section delays are posted outside reading room areas."

New Effort AUGUST<2011 D_MONTH AUGUST,2011 Orders Column,Labels % % Row,Labels Delay,Day Delay,Eve Delay,Night OnFme Grand,Total On$me Delay EMERGENCY,RADIOLOGY 120 237 272 4,618 5,247 88.01% 11.99% CHEST,RADIOLOGY 166 127 441 2,934 3,668 79.99% 20.01% NEURORADIOLOGY 298 432 229 1,814 2,773 65.42% 34.58% PEDI,RADIOLOGY 68 101 157 2,171 2,497 86.94% 13.06% BODY,IMAGING 273 164 135 1,802 2,374 75.91% 24.09% VASCULAR,INTERVENTION 38 11 8 303 360 84.17% 15.83% NUCLEAR,MEDICINE 56 25 1 91 173 52.60% 47.40% Grand,Total 1,019 1,097 1,243 13,733 17,092 80.35% 19.65% SEPTEMBER<1L15<2011 D_MONTH SEP,1T15,2011 Orders Column,Labels % % Row,Labels Delay,Day Delay,Eve Delay,Night OnFme Grand,Total On$me Delay EMERGENCY,RADIOLOGY 77 131 166 2,331 2,705 86.17% 13.83% PEDI,RADIOLOGY 53 70 104 1,167 1,394 83.72% 16.28% CHEST,RADIOLOGY 72 42 134 1,031 1,279 80.61% 19.39% NEURORADIOLOGY 110 180 150 754 1,194 63.15% 36.85% BODY,IMAGING 137 28 18 874 1,057 82.69% 17.31% VASCULAR,INTERVENTION 20 13 5 120 158 75.95% 24.05% NUCLEAR,MEDICINE 25 10 38 73 52.05% 47.95% Grand,Total 494 474 577 6,315 7,860 80.34% 19.66% Source:<RADNET

Thank you.