FINANCE & PERSONNEL REPORT

Similar documents
State Coordinator. Annual Report Template

Public health surveillance for suicide-related data

Washington Update February 15, 2005

Implementation Plan for Needs Identified in Community Health Needs Assessment for

Mental Health Services Provided in Specialty Mental Health Organizations, 2004

Final Fiscal Year 2012 Omnibus Appropriations Bill Summary

SAC (Senate Appropriations Committee) PROGRAM PRESIDENT HAC (House Appropriations Committee) DOJ Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants Coverdell

SAC (Senate Appropriations Committee) PROGRAM PRESIDENT HAC (House Appropriations Committee) DOJ Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants Coverdell

Maternal and Child Health Services Title V Block Grant for New Mexico. Executive Summary. Application for Annual Report for 2015

Forging. Paths. to SAFETY

Income/Revenue Diversification

FY2017 Appropriations for the Department of Justice Grant Programs

Chairman Wolf, Ranking Member Fattah and Members of the Subcommittee,

Arizona Department of Public Safety Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) Administration System for Administering Grants Effectively (SAGE)

LIMITED-SCOPE PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT

Maternal and Child Health Services Title V Block Grant for New Mexico Executive Summary Application for 2016 Annual Report for 2014

Joint Medicaid Oversight Committee Medicaid Behavioral Health Re-Design Panel Testimony

Police - Departmental Performance Report. Police. Community

Arizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary. Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies

FUNDING ASSISTANCE GUIDE

Connecticut s Reliance on Federal Funds

Improving the Emergency Care System for America s Children

AUDIT OF THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING SERVICES AND OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS GRANTS AWARDED TO THE CITY OF BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

Healthcare-Associated Infections: State Plans

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Government-Nonprofit Contracting: From 30,000 Feet to Your Bottom Line

Pediatric Emergency Care. Goals and Strategic Directions 2012

Most Human Needs Programs Have Lost Ground Since 2010, and Stand to Lose More in FYs 2017 and 2018

How North Carolina Compares

New Smyrna Beach Police Department Organizational Chart

OUR UNDERWRITERS. We extend our appreciation to the underwriters for their invaluable support.

The Cost of a Physician Vacancy

Table H GRANT PROGRAMS ELIGIBLE FOR COURSE FEE EXEMPTION

Second Chance Act $25 $100 $100 Federal Prison System $5,700 $6,200 $6,077 $6,760

Sources of Financial Assistance for Firearms Training Simulator and Law Enforcement

Subgrantee Monitoring and Risk Assessment Principles. Leslie O Reilly, VOCA Program Specialist

Lake Country RCMP Detachment

How North Carolina Compares

FEDERAL SPENDING AND REVENUES IN ALASKA

NGO adult mental health and addiction workforce

Tennessee Department of Health Traumatic Brain Injury Program. Annual Report. July 2010 June Winner, Bicycle Safety Poster Contest

Call for Concept Papers for Research Projects for forthcoming Injury Control Research Center (ICRC) application

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION OF COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT (CSBG) AGENCY FUNDING REPORT PROGRAM YEAR 2014

The Fall 2017 State of Grantseeking Report

Exploring Public Health Barriers and Opportunities in Eye Care: Role of Community Health Clinics

Cultural Competency Initiative. Program Guidelines

Lorain County Board of Mental Health Strategic Plan Updates

Profile of State Environmental Health: Summary and Analysis of Workforce Changes from

Vanderbilt University Policy for Cost Sharing on Sponsored Projects

Nicole Galloway, CPA

Community Health Needs Assessment April, 2018

FIVE YEAR FORECAST FY THROUGH FY

Partners in Prevention. Policy and Procedures Manual Fiscal Year

Ryan White Part A FY 2017 Housing RFP RFP Conference. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Published November 23 rd, 2016

Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) CE Sexual Violence Prevention and Education

California Community Clinics

DEATHS FROM SUICIDE among U.S. Veterans & Armed Forces in 16 States

Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT)

GROWING TOGETHER INITIATIVE GRANT REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS

The Economic Impacts of the New Economy Initiative in Southeast Michigan

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS State Public Health Departments to Pilot CSTE Recommended Surveillance Indicators for Substance Use and Mental Health

President Obama s Proposed Program Eliminations for Fiscal Year 2010 (U.S. Department of Education)

Annunciation Maternity Home

FY2019 President s Budget Proposal NACCHO Priority Public Health Program Funding - February 2018

DOT HS August Law Enforcement Highway Safety. Fellowship Program

Counting for Dollars: Washoe County, Nevada

Funding Public Health: A New IOM Report on Investing in a Healthier Future

VIRGINIA SAFE ROUTES to SCHOOL. Non-Infrastructure Grant GUIDELINES

2017 Advancing Health Reform Through Advocacy Request for Proposals Frequently Asked Questions: February 3, 2017

Effective: April 1, 2016

Office of Nursing Research Annual Report

first edition GEORGIA NONPROFIT Employment Report In the Center of the Industry

GAO HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Further Efforts Needed to Address Data Limitations and Better Align Funding with States Top Safety Priorities

Fiscal Research Center

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Counting for Dollars: Sonoma County, California

Comparison of Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Programs and other Federal Assistance to Disadvantaged Communities in EPA Region 4

Cost Share. Office of Sponsored Programs. Where Innovation Is Tradition

Updated July 24, 2017 ASTHO Legislative Summary House FY18 Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Bill

Characteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995

Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT)

President s FY 2012 Budget Request

REQUEST FOR COMPETITIVE BID Strengthening State Systems to Improve Diabetes Management and Outcomes

WAY BEHIND: Report on the State of Mental Health in 2014 DMH Budget: Last in Growth in New England since 2009

Federal Agencies and National Organizations

NON-PROFIT SUMMARY AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS

CTAS FY 2016: Funding Opportunities for Healing to Wellness Courts December 8, 2015

CTAS FY 2017: Funding Opportunities for VAWA Special Domestic Violence Criminal Jurisdiction February 1, 2017

Counting for Dollars: Mercer County, New Jersey

VOCA: Victims of Crime Act Continuation Grant

Relating to Community Recovery after the Tragedy at Umpqua Community College Recovery Framework and Support-to-Date

Counting for Dollars: Boise City, ID

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Pages. Federal Grants

Fiscal Research Center

Department of Human Services PROPOSED FY 2019 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS. County Board Work Session February 28, 2018

Testimony Robert E. O Connor, MD, MPH House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform June 22, 2007

Oregon Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success Initiative Invitation Application. September 30 via

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

Funding at 40. Fulfilling the JJDPA s Core Requirements in an Era of Dwindling Resources

Grande Ronde Hospital, Inc. Community Needs Health Assessment Implementation Strategy Fiscal Years

Transcription:

FINANCE & PERSONNEL REPORT SUMMARY RESULTS FROM THE STATE OF THE STATES FINANCE & PERSONNEL SURVEY In 2014, directors and designated representatives of state health department injury and violence prevention (IVP) programs were asked to complete the Fiscal Year (FFY) 2013 State of the States (SOTS) Finance & Personnel Survey. The summary table below reflects the amount of funding utilized by the 40 state injury and violence prevention programs that responded to the survey. (NOTE: All funding data discussed in this issue brief is self-reported and does not reflect a financial audit of participating state injury and violence prevention programs. Funding amounts for each funding source were prorated to better represent the amount of funding received by state injury and violence prevention programs in : October 1, 2012 September 30, 2013). Table 1. Funding Utilized by State Injury and Violence Prevention Programs (of 40 Survey Respondents) Funding Source Amount Spent by the Injury and Violence Prevention Program ($) Total Min Max Avg. Amount per State ($) Percent of Total National IVP Funding (%) States Reporting Funding (N) State General Revenue 26,758,262 6,476 18,900,000 1,274,203 24.01% 21 Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)/ Maternal Child Health Bureau (MCHB) Title V Block Grant Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/ National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC) Rape Prevention and Education 25,855,357 5,000 11,486,655 1,436,409 23.20% 18 16,786,869 70,058 3,880,409 645,649 15.06% 26 Dedicated State Funding Stream 8,277,950 40,000 1,800,000 517,372 7.43% 16 CDC/NCIPC Core Violence and Injury Prevention Programs 7,942,435 49,690 285,000 189,106 7.13% 20 (VIPP) 1 CDC Preventive Health and Health Services (PHHS) Block Grant 7,882,874 15,039 1,942,825 315,315 7.07% 25 State Highway Safety Office 3,101,469 20,000 1,144,836 221,534 2.78% 14 CDC/NCIPC National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) 2,983,199 180,488 360,000 229,477 2.68% 13 U.S. Department of Justice 2,348,368 58,553 1,234,815 587,092 2.11% 4 Funding Sources 2,300,311 6,469 582,764 153,354 2.06% 15 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) State and Tribal Youth Suicide Prevention Grants 2,231,249 50,000 500,000 371,875 2.00% 6 State Funding Sources 1,200,964 20,791 510,000 120,096 1.08% 10 Emergency Management Agency 1,037,430 322,430 715,000 518,715 0.93% 2 Funding Sources 541,452 10,000 219,400 77,350 0.49% 7 HRSA/MCHB Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) 520,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 0.47% 4 SAMHSA Campus Suicide Prevention Grants 480,000 480,000 480,000 480,000 0.43% 1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) 290,000 140,000 150,000 145,000 0.26% 2 Foundation 211,667 15,000 130,000 70,556 0.19% 3 Nonprofit Organizations 203,476 800 126,176 50,869 0.18% 4 Universities 193,600 34,600 70,000 48,400 0.17% 4 NHTSA Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES) 140,893 20,893 40,000 35,223 0.13% 4 CDC/NCIPC Residential Fire-related Injury Prevention Program 108,777 108,777 108,777 108,777 0.10% 1 Corporate/Private 42,825 14,325 28,500 21,413 0.04% 2 Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) 16,875 850 8,000 2,411 0.02% 7 Grand Total $111,456,302 Lowest State Total $54,933 Average State Total $2,786,408 Highest State Total $22,798,724 1. Core VIPP includes Basic Integration Components and other expanded components (Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention, Regional Network Leaders, Falls Injury Prevention, and Surveillance Quality Improvement). Page 1

TYPES OF FUNDING SOURCES 2 In 2013, $111.4 million was invested nationally in state public health injury and violence prevention programs. This is an average of $2.8 million per state program (median of $1.5 million, ranging from $54,933 to $22.8 million). Investments in state injury and violence prevention programs come from a variety of funding sources, including federal agencies, state governments, non-profit organizations, and foundations. Of the 251 awards that state injury and violence prevention programs received from 21 different funding sources, 68% were federal grants, 24% were from state sources, and 8% were from other sources in 2013. sources contributed $70.9 million (64%) of all funding through 170 funding awards to state injury and violence prevention programs nationwide (Figure 1). State funds contributed $39.3 million (35%) and other sources of funding (i.e., universities, private/corporate, non-profits, etc.) contributed $1.2 million (1%). A greater number of awards came from federal sources than from state and other sources combined. Figure 1. Funding Source Types Awarded to State Health Department Injury and Violence Prevention Programs, 2013 $1.2M 1% 20 8% State $39.3M 35% State 61 24% $70.9M 64% 170 68% While all states that were surveyed reported receiving federal funding, four (10%) of states reported receiving funding from federal sources only (Figure 2) and another four (10%) of states reported not receiving any federal funding. The majority of states (N=32, 78%) received funding from federal and state sources only. Only 10 states (25%) reported receiving funding from federal, state, and other sources. Figure 2. Funding Source Types Awarded to State Health Department Injury and Violence Prevention Programs, 2013 36 32 10 and State, State, and 4 (10%) states did not receive federal sources 4 (10%) states received federal sources only 32 (78%) states received federal and state sources 4 (10%) states received state sources only 25 (63%) states received federal and state sources only 10 (25%) states received federal, state, and other sources 2. All funding data discussed in this issue brief is self-reported and does not reflect a financial audit of participating state injury and violence prevention programs. Funding amounts for each funding source were prorated to better represent the amount of funding received by state injury and violence prevention programs in : October 1, 2012 September 30, 2013 Page 2

State injury and violence prevention programs received funding from a median of five total funding sources (ranging from one to 14 funding sources). They received funding from a median of four federal sources (ranging from one to 10 sources), two state sources (ranging one to three sources), and two other sources (ranging from one to three sources). STATE & NATIONAL PER CAPITA COMPARISONS In a single year, injuries and violence will ultimately cost the United States $406 billion, which includes over $80 billion in medical costs and $326 billion in lost productivity. 3 This is an annual cost of nearly $1,303 for every individual living in the U.S. In contrast, only about $111.4 million was invested nationally in state public health injury and violence prevention programs in 2013. This amount resulted in a national average investment of only $0.45 per person in the United States. While five state injury and violence prevention programs were funded at amounts close to or equal to the national average of $0.45 per person, 21 state programs were funded at less than the national average (Figure 3). Five state programs received between $0.16 and $0.30 per person, while eleven state programs received funding that equated to less than $0.15 per person. At the other end of the spectrum, several state programs received funding amounts equal to or greater than the national average. Thirteen state programs received between $0.45 and $1.00 per person, while another four state programs received and invested more than $1.00 per person to support injury and violence prevention efforts. Figure 3. State Health Department Injury and Violence Prevention 2013 Funding per Capita: State Funding per Capita Compared to National Funding per Capita ($0.45 per capita) State IVP Funding per Capita Less than $0.15 per person $0.16 - $0.30 per person $0.31 - $0.44 per person $0.45 - $1.00 per person More than $1.00 per person No data available 3. Finkelstein EA, Corso PS, Miller TR, Associates. Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. Page 3

ALLOCATION OF FUNDING AND PROGRAMMATIC TOPIC AREAS SUPPORTED In 2013, the majority of state injury and violence prevention program funding ($60.6 million, 54%) was allocated to grants, minigrants, and contracts that supported programmatic efforts (Figure 4). The next highest allocation of funding ($29.0 million, 26%) went to support personnel. Overhead expenses, safety equipment, and other spending categories made up the remaining 20% of all expenses incurred by state injury and violence prevention programs in 2013. 4 Figure 4. Allocation of State Health Department Injury and Violence Prevention Funding Nationwide, 2013 $60.6 M $29.0 M $9.2 M In Fiscal Year 2013, $111.4 million was invested nationally in state public health injury and violence prevention programs $5.2 M $4.0 M $3.4 M Grants/Mini-Grants/ Contracts Personnel (Salary & Fringe) Safety Equipment Contractor/Consultant (Company or Individual) Overhead Expenses (Indirect Costs) States were asked to list the injury and violence topic areas addressed by each funding source. Almost all funding sources were used to address multiple topics. The five most common injury and violence-related topics that were supported by all funding sources were: 1. Motor vehicle injury prevention 2. Fall injury prevention 3. Sexual assault/rape prevention 4. Suicide/self-inflicted injury prevention 5. Poisoning/prescription drug overdose prevention As shown in Table 2, state injury and violence prevention programs used a variety of funding sources to address the five most common injury and violence topic areas in 2013. Eighteen (18) sources and 80 awards were used to address motor vehicle injury prevention efforts nationally. The most commonly reported funding sources used to support motor vehicle injury prevention were CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP, State Highway Safety Office, State General Revenue, and HRSA/MCHB Title V Block Grant. Fall injury prevention efforts were supported by a total of 13 funding sources and 56 awards nationwide. The most commonly reported funding sources for fall injury prevention were CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP, the CDC Preventive Health and Health Services (PHHS) Block Grant, and the HRSA/MCHB Title V Block Grant. Sexual assault/rape prevention efforts were supported by a total of 12 funding sources and 55 awards nationwide. The most commonly reported funding sources for sexual assault/rape prevention were CDC/NCIPC Rape Prevention and Education, CDC PHHS Block Grant, and State General Revenue. Table 2. Five Most Common Injury and Violence Topic Areas and Supporting Funding Sources, 2013 Rank IVP Topic Area No. of Funding Sources (No. of Awards) 1 Motor vehicle injury prevention 18 (80) 2 Fall injury prevention 13 (56) 3 Sexual assault/rape prevention 12 (55) Most Commonly Reported Funding Sources State Used to Support IVP Topic Area CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP; State Highway Safety Office; State General Revenue; HRSA/ MCHB Title V Block Grant; CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP; CDC PHHS Block Grant; State General Revenue; HRSA/ MCHB Title V Block Grant CDC/NCIPC Rape Prevention and Education (RPE); CDC PHHS Block Grant; State General Revenue 4 Suicide/self-inflicted injury prevention 17 (55) CDC/NCIPC NVDRS; State General Revenue; HRSA/MCHB Title V Block Grant 5 Poisoning/prescription drug overdose prevention 13 (51) Core VIPP; CDC PHHS Block Grant; State General Revenue; HRSA/MCHB Title V Block Grant 4. Finkelstein EA, Corso PS, Miller TR, Associates. Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. Page 4

INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES AND FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS (FTE) A total of $60.6 million from 21 different funding sources supported 431 individual employees working in state health department injury and violence prevention programs. Of these individuals, 341 (79%) were full-time or part-time paid staff, 49 (11%) were full-time or part-time contractors, and the remaining 41 (10%) worked in other capacities. Staff time that is dedicated to state injury and violence prevention programs is measured in terms of full-time equivalents (FTEs). 5 The 431 individual employees working in state injury and violence prevention programs in 2013 equated to a total of 341.69 FTEs. State programs had a median of 7.50 FTEs and an average of 8.54 FTEs, with values ranging from 0.55 to 26.00 FTEs. A quarter of states had less than 3.00 FTEs in their injury and violence prevention program, 50% had between 3.50 and 12.83 FTEs, and the remaining 25% had more than 12.84 FTEs. FTEs contributed to injury and violence prevention efforts through a variety of primary roles, including intervention/program coordination (32%), data collection and analysis (15%), and management (13%) (Figure 5). The majority of states did not have any FTEs with primary roles in public policy (75%), evaluation (63%), or technical assistance and training (55%). Only three states had staff with time dedicated to all of the nine primary staff roles depicted in Figure 5. Figure 5. Distribution of FTE Primary Staff Roles from All Funding Sources, 2013 32% 15% 13% 11% 9% Intervention & Program Coordination Data Analysis & Collection Management Support Staff/Administrative Coalition Building & Coordination 9% 6% 2% 2% 1% Evaluation Technical Assistance & Training Public Policy & Advocacy Communications 341.69 Full-Time Equivalents Worked within State Injury and Violence Prevention Programs in Fiscal Year 2013 5. Full-time equivalents (FTEs): the total number of hours worked by an individual employee divided by the total number of work hours in a full-time schedule (defined as 40 hours per week). Page 5

TOP FUNDING SOURCES Of the 21 funding sources included in the 2013 State of the States (SOTS) Finance and Personnel Survey, six sources accounted for 84% ($93.5 million) of the total amount of funding utilized by state injury and violence prevention programs in 2013. These sources included State General Revenue, HRSA/MCHB Title V Block, CDC/NCIPC RPE, Dedicated State Funding Stream, CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP, and CDC PHHS Block Grant (Figure 6). Of these six top funding sources, four were federal sources and two were state sources. State General Revenue contributed the most dollars to state injury and violence prevention programs. In 2013, 21 states received a combined total of $26.8 million (24% of state program funding nationally) from State General Revenue. In contrast, the CDC PHHS Block Grant provided less total funding to state injury and violence prevention programs ($7.9 million or 7% of state program funding nationally), but provided funding to more states (N=25). Additionally, although fewer states received Dedicated State Funding Stream dollars, this funding source contributed slightly more funding to state injury and violence prevention programs than CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP or the CDC PHHS Block Grant. Figure 6. Number of States that Reported Receiving the Funding Sources vs. Total Provided by Each Funding Source, 2013. 30 25 Funding Source Type: State Top Funding Sources State General Revenue HRSA/MCHB Title V Block Grant Total Provided by Each Funding Source ($) Millions 20 15 10 5 0 Dedicated State Funding Stream CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP CDC/NCIPC RPE CDC PHHS Block Grant P Q A G L M R C H D O B E F I, J L L N 0 K 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of State IVPs that Reported Receiving the Funding Source A. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Campus Suicide Prevention Grants B. CDC/NCIPC Residential Fire-related Injury Prevention Program C. Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) D. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) E. Corporate/Private F. Foundation G. U.S. Department of Justice H. HRSA/MCHB Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) I. NHTSA Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES) J. Nonprofit Organizations K. Universities L. SAMHSA State and Tribal Youth Suicide Prevention Grants M. Funding Sources N. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) O. State Funding Sources P. CDC/NCIPC National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) Q. State Highway Safety Office R. Funding Sources Page 6

The six top sources supported 233.13 FTEs, or 70% of all staff of state health department injury and violence prevention programs (Figure 7). Although State General Revenue contributed the largest dollar amount to support FTEs, CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP funding supported the highest number of FTEs (59.48). Figure 7. Comparison of FTEs in Top Six Funding Sources to All Sources 30% 101.16 FTEs 70% 233.13 FTEs 70% 233.13 FTEs Remaining 15 Funding Sources FTEs Supported by Top Funding Sources: CDC/NCIPC Core 59.48 FTEs State General Revenue 59.27 FTEs HRSA/MCHB Title V Block Grant 36.23 FTEs CDC/NCIPC RPE 36.10 FTEs CDC PHHS Block Grant 26.05 FTEs Dedicated State Funding Stream 16.00 FTEs 18% 18% 11% 11% 8% 5% BUDGET CUTS Sixty percent of states (N=25) experienced budget cuts in 2013. These budget cuts impacted numerous funding sources and, in turn, adversely affected the activities and services provided by state health department injury and violence prevention programs. The most commonly reported consequences of budget cuts were reductions in support to partners (68%), services (64%), and surveillance efforts (44%), as well as the loss of staff through attrition (36%) (Figure 8). Figure 8. Anticipated Impacts of Budget Cuts, 2013 Reduction in support to partners Reduction in services Reduction in surveillance efforts Loss of staff through attrition Elimination of entire program(s) Reduction in support to local health departments Staff layoffs Staff furloughs 8% 12% 24% 24% 36% 44% 68% 64% Safe States Alliance 2200 Century Parkway, Suite 700 Atlanta, Georgia 30345 (770) 690-9000 (Phone) (770) 690-8996 (Fax) Page 7