Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance

Similar documents
Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

A Military C2 Professional s Thoughts on Visualization

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Wildland Fire Assistance

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Mission Task Analysis for the NATO Defence Requirements Review

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Report Documentation Page

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? Submitted by Capt Mark C. Brown CG #15. Majors Dixon and Duryea EWS 2005

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

Improving the Tank Scout. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain R.L. Burton CG #3, FACADs: Majors A.L. Shaw and W.C. Stophel 7 February 2006

MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

BW Threat & Vulnerability

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

The Use of Sikes Act Cooperative Agreements for Implementing INRMP Projects

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

Report No. DODIG December 5, TRICARE Managed Care Support Contractor Program Integrity Units Met Contract Requirements

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

COTS Impact to RM&S from an ISEA Perspective

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

MCAS BEAUFORT SUSTAINABLE RANGES BRIEF MCAS BEAUFORT COMMUNITY PLANS AND LIAISON OFFICE (CP&L)

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

The first EHCC to be deployed to Afghanistan in support

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

at the Missile Defense Agency

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

An Overview of Romanian Command and Control Systems

Intelligence, Information Operations, and Information Assurance

Experience and Consequences on the Deployments of the Medical Services of the German Army in Foreign Countries Surgical Aspects

The Affect of Division-Level Consolidated Administration on Battalion Adjutant Sections

711 HPW COUNTERPROLIFERATION BRANCH

Financial Management

Google Pilot / WEdge Viewer

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

2010 Fall/Winter 2011 Edition A army Space Journal

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

A system overview of the Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-based Epidemics

Navy Recruiting and Applicant Attraction:

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Transcription:

Canadian Forces Project Land Force ISTAR Mr David Connell Department of National Defence Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 02 SEP 2003 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Canadian Forces Project Land Force ISTAR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance) 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Department of National Defence, Canada 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM001676, UAV 2002 Conference & Exhibition., The original document contains color images. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 19 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Presentation Outline What is ISTAR? Deficiencies Options Examined Deliverables Schedule STANAG 4586 and the Canadian effort EX ROBUST RAM, ISTAR and the Pointer UAV lessons learned

Common Operating Picture (CFCS) CFISR Recognized Land Picture Recognized Maritime Picture LFC2IS Recognized Air Picture

Capability Deficiencies Communications C2 Sensors Lack bandwidth to distribute data & information Can not download data from aerial vehicles Limited, makeshift access to national & Allied ISR data No tactical level reliability or repeatability for intelligence products No tactical level ISTAR facility to support C2 Existing generalpurpose sensors not integrated Limited capability of tactical EW sensors No capability to conduct reconnaissance beyond line of sight No capability to detect and locate source of hostile indirect fire

Project Phases Identification Options Analysis Definition Implementation Identify capability deficiency Formulate options Detailed review Implementation Discard invalid options Risk assessment Implementation management Assess benefits of remaining options Costing of selected option Implementation monitoring Examine risk Decide which option should be pursued Implementation planning Status Reports Operational Handover Close out Development

Options Examined Maintain Status Quo. Unacceptable Develop specific/custom tailored LF ISTAR components Not recommended. This would be a very risky venture requiring huge investments, research and development several years of development. Acquire Commercial/Military-Off-the-Shelf components Preferred Solution.Technologies for information sharing, fusion and analysis are very mature within the commercial business and military industry.

Tactical UAV Sensors Develop concepts of operation in concert with the Command Support Pilot Project and CF Experimentation Centre Define possible payload requirements Continue validation of STANAG 4586 Tactical Common Datalink (TCDL) Acquire two TCDL systems to integrate within TCCCS Conduct experiments to link with ERSTA Griffon, CP-140 Aurora, UAV Confirmation of STANAG 7085 requirement $2.6 M Acquire Risk Reduction Units $2.5 M Conduct integration tests in conjunction with Command Support Pilot Project Trial in field environment to define usage methodology Definition of tactics, techniques and procedures (TTP) for new equipment $4.5 M

Project Deliverables Definition Phase Only Communications C2 Acquire and Integrate Establish PMO/Configuration Management Facility Sensors Weapon Tactical UAV Sensors Locating Sensors ISTAR CMF PMO PMPR (36 pers) High Capacity Data Radio (HCDR) Enhancements to EW Sensors. Acquire Risk Reduction Units Tactical Common Datalink (TCDL) -rjsfc' XA's*- tt^ Enhance Existing Sensors Skyguard ADATS I R. Met LAV 3 LAV Recce I-. -.,..

Project Schedule 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Communications & Datalinks Definition { Command & Control { Components EW Sensor Enhancements HCDR TCDL { ISTAR C2 (CGW) ESM, EA, Fusion & Analysis New Sensors { Legacy Sensors { UAV CBTA LAV 3 LAV Coyote LLAD Met System Project Management Office

STANAG 4586 Standard Interfaces of UAV Control System (UCS) for NATO UAV Interoperability

Canadian International Technology Demonstration Program (ITDP) STANAG 4586 VCS Vehicle Control Panel

Canadian ITDP : Data Link Interface validation Contract start December 2001 Contract end March 2002 (virtual validation) Canadian Forces planning on participating in US operational validation in 2003

Canadian ITDP CDL Systems Ltd Calgary Universal Control System (UCS) - Interfaces Vehicle Specific Module (VSM) front end Data Link Interface (DLI) Core UCS back end Command and Control Interface (CCI) C4I Systems CDL Systems validation effort VCS CDl SYSTEMS Human- Computer Interface (HCI)

Vehicle Specific Module AAI Corp Shadow 200 (US Army TUAV) Bombardier CL-327 Guardian

EX ROBUST RAM :v^.^:-':^.: ^^*.-'mi-^ ^'-' Flights 12-24 April 02 Western Canada

Ex Robust Ram - ISTAR Results Communications C2 Acquire and Integrate Establish Configuration Management Facility Pointer UAV tested & linked to Bde HQ LAN through HCDR & Microwave link ISTAR CMF PMO PMPR High Capacity Data Radio (HCDR) Tactical Common Datalink (TCDL) Sensors Weapon Tactical UAV Sensors Locating Sensors Enhancements to EW Sensors. Acquire Risk Reduction Units Coyote made network ready & linked to Bde HQ LAN through HCDR Enhance Existing Sensors LAV 3 ADATS Met Skyguard LAV Recce

Status - Sub-Tactical UAV Pointer UAV is excellent. Easy to operate, quick response (5 minutes between flights) and well suited to Recce Sqn tasks. Despite high winds (35 kts +) Pointer could always fly always extend the horizon of forward troops such as Coyote! r<

Possible Concepts Combat Team Commander s Personal Air Patrol On the Move!

Canadian Forces Project Land Force ISTAR Contacts Project Director Lieutenant Colonel Lee Nickerson Project Manager Lieutenant Colonel Allan McPhee Deputy Project Manager (UAV) Captain Jacques Gobin gobin.jr@forces.ca