MEMORANDUM. February 12, Interagency Transit Committee Members and Interested Parties. Anthony Zepeda, Associate Regional Planner

Similar documents
Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

Availability of Draft Amendment No. 1 to the 2019 FTIP for Interagency Consultation and Public Review

Meeting Agenda Thursday, September 6, 2018 Time: 10:00 a.m.

Meeting Agenda Thursday, March 1, 2018 Time: 10:00 a.m.

RULES CONCERNING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM

MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE STANCOG BOARD ROOM 1111 I STREET, SUITE 308 MODESTO, CA WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 4, :00 PM

Table to accompany Insight on the Issues 39: Policy Options to Improve Specialized Transportation

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)

Navigating MAP 21. Securing Federal Funding for Community Walking & Biking Projects

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

Grant Application Instructions FFY

.?-& Approved as to Fonn. R. ZIEGLER, County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMD~, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NUMBER:

PRESENTER: Chris Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer

Special Meeting Agenda

SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Annual Listing of Projects with Federal Funding for Federal Fiscal Year 2014/15

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Centre County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Coordinating Committee Meeting Tuesday, March 22, :00 p.m.

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

AD HOC Committee for Transit To Start Immediately After Management and Finance Committee

State Clearinghouse Handbook

Fiscal Year 2017/18 Final Draft April 19, 2017

AMERICA BIKES SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAMS SAFETEA LU VS. MAP 21

Metro REVISED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE JUNE 18, 2014

This page left blank intentionally.

Long Range Transportation Plan

APPENDIX 5. Funding Plan

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

POLICY BOARD MEETING STANCOG BOARD ROOM 1111 I STREET, SUITE 308 MODESTO, CA WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, :00 PM

Re: Comments on the Draft Guidelines for the Low-Carbon Transit Operations Program

August 9, Re: DBE Program Triennial Goal Concurrence - Recipient ID #1674. Dear Mr. Smith:

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 7, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Changes from Committee Background MTC began preparing its 2017 RTP Update earlier this yea

MOBILITY PARTNERSHIP AGENDA

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

Any travel outside the Pacific Area requires pre-approval by the Area Manager, Operations Support.

Memorandum. Date: May 13, INFORMATION: Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-Aside Implementation Guidance (Revised by the FAST Act)

APP NVITAT ON LETTERS COOPERATING AGENCY - Agency Categories:

PACIFIC SURFLINER PACIFIC SURFLINER CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES. And. serving. serving. Effective MAY 10, 2010

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL DIANA GOMEZ

Public and Agency Involvement. 8.1 Scoping Meetings and Noticing. Chapter 8

UC MERCED. Sep-2017 Report. Economic Impact in the San Joaquin Valley and State (from the period of July 2000 through August 2017 cumulative)

Regional Transportation Plan & Sustainable Communities Strategy. Public Participation Plan

CALIFORNIA S URBAN CRIME INCREASE IN 2012: IS REALIGNMENT TO BLAME?

Regional Planning Partnership

THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRANT WRITING ASSISTANCE FOR THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

CSUF & Telecommuting. An analysis of the potential application of telecommuting practices at CSUF

AGENDA. 2. Minutes: Approve Minutes of October 18, 2017 ACTION State Transportation Improvement Program ACTION Funding Recommendations

FISCAL YEAR OVERALL WORK PROGRAM

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

15 1. John Yehall Chin Elementary Safe Routes to School Project;

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: January 21, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 8B

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Test Site Test Date Exam Time Test Site # 5318 Academy 355 Gellert Blvd. Suite 101 Daly City, CA 94015

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act

LPA Programs How They Work

Authority Board March 26, 2013

Questions & Answers. Elderly Individuals & Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310), JARC & New Freedom Programs Last Updated April 29, 2009

Non-Motorized Transportation Funding Options

2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage.

Memorandum. Date: To: Prospective Project Sponsors From: Aprile Smith Senior Transportation Planner Through: Subject:

Finance Committee October 18, 2011

Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza z13.gzz.zo~-.,. Los Angeles, CA g0012-2g52 rnetro.net

2018 Project Selection Process. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

Michigan Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

Sources of Funding for Transit in Urban Areas in Texas Final report PRC

ATP Technical Advisory Committee Concept Rollout, Stakeholder Comments, Moving Forward

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

POLICY BOARD MEETING STANCOG BOARD ROOM 1111 I STREET, SUITE 308 MODESTO, CA WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 11, :00 PM

Citizens Advisory Committee May 23, 2012

chapter 5 Action Plan

FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

Please complete your phone connection now:

Regional Sustainable Infrastructure Planning Grant Program Cycle 1. FINAL Draft

APPENDIX A SCOPE OF WORK

San Joaquin Valley Regional Planning Agencies Directors Committee

- WELCOME TO THE NETWORK-

MARYLAND STATE MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT

Process Review. Santa Fe Metropolitan Planning Organization Review. July 18-19, Final REPORT. Prepared by: FHWA New Mexico Division

California Economic Snapshot 3 rd Quarter 2014

Staff Report. Allocation of Congestion Management and Air Quality Improvement Program Funding

FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

WELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Modesto Junior College, 435 College Avenue Modesto, CA /3/14 10:00AM 1:00PM MOORPARK EA 7075 Campus Rd., Moorpark, CA 93021

2017 CALWORKS TRAINING ACADEMY

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

California Catholic. Health Care Not-for-profit ministries serving patients and communities especially the poor and vulnerable throughout California

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

APPLYING TO THE UNIVERSITIES

FY 2015 Value Pricing Pilot Program Discretionary Grant Program

Transcription:

MEMORANDUM February 12, 2014 To: Fr: Re: Interagency Transit Committee Members and Interested Parties Anthony Zepeda, Associate Regional Planner Cancellation of February 19, 2014 ITC Meeting The Interagency Transit Committee (ITC) meeting for February 19, 2014 is cancelled due to a lack of action and discussion items that would warrant a meeting. Attached, however, is an information packet for February. The next regularly scheduled meeting of the ITC is scheduled for March 19, 2014 at 1:30 PM at the SJCOG office (555 E. Weber Avenue, Stockton, CA).

SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Meeting Cancelled for Wednesday, February 19, 2014 INTERAGENCY TRANSIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION ONLY PACKET 1. FY 2014 5339 Call for Projects 2. FY 2014-15 Draft UTN Notice of Public Hearing 3. FY 2014 CMAQ Call for Projects Update 4. FY 2014 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Guidelines and Call for Projects Schedule

STATE OF CALIFORNIA-BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF MASS TRANSPORTATION MS 39 1120 N STREET P. 0. BOX 942874 SACRAMENTO, CA 94274-0001 PHONE (916) 654-6990 FAX (916) 654-9366 TTY 711 www.dot.ca.gov EDMUND G BROWN Jr Governor Flex your power! Be energy efficient! January 9, 2014 To: MPOs and RTP As Subject: Call for Projects - Ff A Section 5339 Small Urban Formula Distribution The California Department of Transportation's (Caltrans), Division of Mass Transportation (DMT) is pleased to announce a call for Federal Transit Administration (FfA) Section 5339 projects for the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2013. Section 5339 is a new formula program that provides funding for capital projects to replace, rehabilitate, and purchase buses and bus-related equipment, and bus-related facilities. This program was established under Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21), replacing the previous Section 5309 discretionary program established under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). The funding available to small urban areas with populations between 50,000 and 200,000 for FFY 2013 is $7,381,525. Please refer to Attachment 1 for the distribution for each region. During this initial call for Section 5339 projects DMT will not be accepting applications to construct bus-facilities. Applications for Section 5339 funding is limited to projects to replace, rehabilitate, and purchase buses and bus-related equipment and facilities. Projects to construct Section 5339 bus-facilities may be included in future funding years. Applications and all required plans and documents need to be submitted in PDF format via e-mail to 5339apps@dot.ca.gov on or before March 15,2014. The application and guidelines are posted on the DMT website at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/masstrans/5339.html. For more information, please contact Annette Clark at 916-654-8628 or Annette Clark@dot.ca.gov. We look forward to working with you in this application cycle. MARKCODEY Chief, Office of Federal Transit Grants Enclosure: Ff A Section 5339 - Small Urban Formula Distribution "Caltrans improves mobility across California"

Attachment 1 Federal Transit Administration Section 5339 Small Urban Formula Distribution California Arroyo Grande-Grover Beach, CA $ Camarillo, CA $ Chico, CA $ Davis, CA $ Delano, CA $ El Centro-Calexico, CA $ El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles)-Atascadero, CA $ Fairfield, CA $ Gilroy-Morgan Hill, CA $ Hanford, CA $ Hemet,CA $ Livermore, CA $ Lodi, CA $ Lompoc, CA $ Madera, CA $ Manteca, CA $ Merced, CA $ Napa,CA $ Petaluma, CA $ Porterville, CA $ Redding, CA $ Salinas, CA $ San Luis Obispo, CA $ Santa Barbara, CA $ Santa Cruz, CA $ Santa Maria, CA $ Seaside-Monterey, CA $ Simi Valley, CA $ Tracy, CA $ Turlock, CA $ Vacaville, CA $ Vallejo, CA $ Watsonville, CA $ Woodland, CA $ Yuba City, CA $ Yuma, AZ--CA $ $7,381,525 85,828 146,615 184,835 202,556 158,222 233,690 102,622 279,594 158,851 176,443 337,885 169,056 168,811 136,468 167,500 189,181 259,390 170,991 124,504 148,012 166,621 414,544 112,594 418,774 305,151 328,423 219,495 291,009 201,862 227,923 195,187 380,183 148,965 141,332 227,320 1,086 "Caltrans improves mobility across California"

Notice of Public Hearing before the San Joaquin Council of Governments NOTICE IS HEARBY GIVEN that at 2:00 PM (or shortly thereafter) on March 24, 2014 at the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG), 555 E. Weber Avenue, Stockton, California, a public hearing will be held to receive oral and written statements regarding the analysis and determination of Unmet Transit Needs for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Draft Report. The public comment period for this document begins with this Notice and will close at 5:00 p.m. on March 24, 2014. SJCOG will consider this report for adoption at the April 24, 2014 Board of Directors meeting. Each year pursuant to state law, the San Joaquin Council of Governments must identify any unmet transit needs that may exist anywhere in San Joaquin County. If needs are found a further determination must be made as to whether those needs are reasonable to meet. State law, as presented in the Transportation Development Act (TDA) requires SJCOG to ensure that reasonable needs are met before Local Transportation Funds (LTF) are allocated for non-transit purposes. If you have any issues relevant to this item, you are invited to be present. If you challenge the nature of the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raise only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the SJCOG at or prior to the close of the public comment period. This document is available for public review. Copies can be obtained at the address above, electronically at www.sjcog.org, by calling (209) 235-0600, or via email at info@sjcog.org. Written comments and statements may be submitted to SJCOG at 555 E. Weber Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202, emailed to Daniel Meza at meza@sjcog.org, faxed to 209-235-0438, or via phone by calling the SJCOG office at 209-235-0600.

February 2014 ITC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Fiscal Year 2014 Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program Call for Projects Update Information SUMMARY: The San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) initiated a Call for Projects (CFP) for the 2014 Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) Program on December 18, 2013. The CFP will result in the programming of new CMAQ projects in Fiscal Years (FYs) 2016/17 and 2017/18, which are being added to the SJCOG Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) as part of the 2015 FTIP Update. An estimated $20.2 million will be available for the CMAQ CFP. From the beginning of the 2014 CMAQ CFP development in October 2013, SJCOG staff, in coordination with the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and the CMAQ Policy Review Committee, have worked closely with projects sponsors to ensure that the application development process, scoring criteria, and project selection/project eligibility criteria have met the following standards: 1. Transparency. The application process, scoring criteria, cost effectiveness methods, and project selection criteria were developed, reviewed and approved by the TAC and presented for SJCOG Board of Directors approval in December 2013. This information was included in the December 18 th, 2013 CFP Announcement. 2. Objectivity. All project applications are subject to the established scoring criteria and cost-effectiveness methods approved by the TAC and Board in December 2013. The expectations and responsibilities of project sponsors are clearly established in the 2014 CMAQ Application and Scoring Criteria. 3. Accessibility. All of the 2014 CMAQ CFP materials have been made readily available to potential applicants and project sponsors throughout the process. SJCOG sent the information via email to the TAC as well as posting the 2014 CFP on the SJCOG web page. In addition, SJCOG staff initiated meetings with partner agencies to discuss potential CMAQ projects and address any questions related to the CMAQ Program. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Information only.

FISCAL IMPACT: Based on the CMAQ apportionment estimates provided by Caltrans, there is approximately $20.2 million dollars in CMAQ funding for the FY 2014 CMAQ Call for Projects including $19.4 million in new apportionments and approximately $820,000 in carry-over funding from the FY 2012 CMAQ Cost Savings pool. BACKGROUND: 2014 CMAQ Call for Projects Progress to Date SJCOG staff began development of the 2014 CMAQ CFP process in October 2013. The following is a list of milestones to date: In October 2013, SJCOG announced the development of the upcoming 2014 CMAQ CFP to the TAC. It was requested by TAC members that SJCOG provide clarification on the existing CMAQ Cost Savings Policy, Cost Effectiveness Policy, and the Scoring Criteria. In November 2013, SJCOG facilitated a meeting of the CMAQ Policy Review Committee to establish and clarify the 2014 CMAQ Cost Savings Policy, Cost Effectiveness Policy, Traffic Signal Default Values, and Scoring Criteria. The recommendations of the Policy Review Committee were presented-to and approved by the SJCOG Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Board of Directors (Board) in December 2013. SJCOG staff conducted CMAQ outreach meetings with local agencies to discuss potential projects and address questions regarding the CMAQ Program as well as to clarify the CMAQ Scoring Criteria and Cost Effectiveness Policy (December 2013 through February 2014). At the request of the TAC, SJCOG initiated contact with the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to discuss the impact of Roundabout and Bicycle/Pedestrian projects in the ARB Cost Effectiveness Model. The results of these discussions were shared with the TAC and project sponsors via email on January 23 rd, 2014. SJCOG conducted a CMAQ Workshop for project sponsors on January 16 th, 2014 to provide an overview of the CMAQ Program and an introduction to the ARB Cost Effectiveness Model. The results of the Workshop and a follow-up list of Workshop questions and answers (Q&A) were emailed to TAC members and project sponsors on January 23 rd, 2014. SJCOG staff worked with project sponsors to develop a working methodology for demonstrating the benefits of Roundabout projects. This information was shared at the 2014 CMAQ Workshop and included in the subsequent Workshop Q&A emailed out to project sponsor.

2014 CMAQ Scoring Committee and Project Selection Applications for the 2014 CMAQ CFP are due to the SJCOG offices by 5:00 PM on Friday, February 14 th, 2014. The applications will be reviewed, scored and ranked by the CMAQ Scoring Committee an ad hoc committee made up of TAC representatives and traffic engineers from partner agencies. All submitted applications will be reviewed and scored based upon the existing Scoring Criteria and Cost Effectiveness Policy approved by the TAC and SJCOG Board of Directors in December 2013. The CMAQ Scoring Committee is scheduled to meet on Thursday, February 20 th and Wednesday, February 26 th from approximately 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM to review, score and rank the 2014 project applications. SJCOG is open to the suggestion of holding only one meeting on February 26 th, although this will be subject to the total number of applications received by SJCOG for this cycle. The purpose of holding two meetings is to ensure that the CMAQ Scoring Committee has adequate time to successfully review and score all project applications. After the Scoring Committee has completed the review, scoring and ranking of the 2014 applications, a final ranked list of CMAQ funding recommendations will be presented for review and approval to the SJCOG standing committees in March 2014. The final Board-approved funding recommendations will then be incorporated into the 2015 FTIP update. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2014 CMAQ Call for Projects Schedule Prepared by: Anthony M. Zepeda, Associate Regional Planner M\STAFFRPT\2014\February\ITC\FY 2014 CMAQ Call for Projects Update.doc

ATTACHMENT 1: 2014 CMAQ Call for Projects Schedule December 12, 2013: December 18, 2013: SJCOG Board Approves the 2014 CMAQ Scoring Criteria, Cost Savings Policy, Cost Effectiveness Policy and Authorizes Staff to Initiate the 2014 CMAQ Call for Projects Announce 2014 CMAQ Call for Projects Dec. 2013 Feb. 2014: SJCOG Conducts One-on-One Meetings with Project Sponsors to Develop and Refine Potential Projects January 16, 2014: February 14, 2014: CMAQ Workshop for Project Sponsors CMAQ Applications Due to SJCOG Offices by 5:00 PM February 20, 2014: February 26, 2014: CMAQ Scoring Committee to Review and Score Applications / Project Sponsor Presentations CMAQ Scoring Committee to Review and Score Applications / Project Sponsor Presentations March 12, 2014: March 25, 2014: Present Scoring Committee Rankings/Funding Recommendations to the Technical Advisory Committee for Approval Present Scoring Committee Ranking/Funding Recommendations to the SCJOG Board of Directors for Approval

February 2014 TAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED ACTION: 2014 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Guidelines and Call for Projects Schedule Information SUMMARY: The Active Transportation Program (ATP) was created in 2013 by Senate Bill 99 and Assembly Bill 101 to promote the increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking. The ATP consolidates funding from the federal Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), the federal Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program, the state Safe Routes to School (SR2S) program, and the state Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA). The new ATP will divide approximately $120 million per year between the state and regions according to guidelines developed by the California Transportation Commission (CTC). Consistent with the federal TAP requirements, the Draft ATP Guidelines distribute the total annual funding capacity between three separate programs with 10% going to small urban/rural areas with populations of 200,000 or less, 40% going to Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) in urban areas with populations greater than 200,000 and 50% going to a statewide program. All funding must be competitively awarded with the requirement that 25% of the funds in each program benefit disadvantaged communities. While the state (Caltrans) will manage the competitive selection process for both the statewide and small urban/rural programs, the state is not eligible to use ATP funds. A link to the full draft 2014 ATP Guidelines is identified in the attachments. Per the draft 2014 ATP Guidelines and schedule, the SJCOG region will have two separate opportunities to fund ATP eligible projects. The first is as part of the statewide program and the second is as part of SJCOG s own MPO program. With the statewide program preceding the MPO programs, SJCOG is seeking to work with local agencies and active transportation interest groups to advance candidate projects for the statewide program call for projects that will begin on March 21, 2014. This may include the convening of a new multidisciplinary ATP advisory committee that will ultimately be required to support the selection of projects through SJCOG s MPO program. As part of this effort SJCOG will be considering the use of Measure K Bicycle/Pedestrian/Safe Routes to School funds to support the local match requirements of candidate projects. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discussion only.

FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. SCHEDULE: CTC adopts ATP Guidelines March 20, 2014 Statewide ATP Call for Projects begins March 21, 2014 Project applications due to Caltrans May 21, 2014 MPOs submit optional guidelines to Caltrans May 21, 2014 CTC action on MPO guidelines June 25, 2014 CTC adopts statewide ATP projects August 20, 2014 MPO project recommendations due to CTC September 30, 2014 CTC adopts MPO project recommendations December 10, 2014 ATTACHMENTS: 1) Draft 2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines available at: http://www.catc.ca.gov/programs/atp/draft_atp_%20guidelines_012914.pdf 2) 2014 Active Transportation Program Fund Estimate Prepared By: Wil Ridder, Senior Regional Planner

State of California California State Transportation Agency DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION M e m o r a n d u m To: CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CTC Meeting: December 11-12, 2013 Reference No.: 4.4 Action Item From: STEVEN KECK Acting Chief Financial Officer Prepared by: Ron Sheppard Division Chief Budgets Subject: 2014 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FUND ESTIMATE RESOLUTION G-13-17 RECOMMENDATION: The California Department of Transportation (Department) requests the California Transportation Commission (Commission) approve the 2014 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Fund Estimate. ISSUE: The 2014 ATP Fund Estimate s program capacities are based on Senate Bill (SB) 99 and Assembly Bill (AB) 101, along with the Federal Highway Administration, Commission and California State Transportation Agency guidance. The Department will work with Commission Staff to make any needed updates or amendments. In addition, the following assumptions were used to calculate the 2014 ATP Fund Estimate s program capacities: 1. Distribution to Metropolitan Planning Organizations is based upon total population. Federal Transportation Alternative Program (TAP) funding distributed according to Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP21) guidance. Other federal funds distributed by total population. 2. Recreational Trails not subject to Federal TAP distribution guidelines. 3. Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program funds will not be used in the ATP. 4. 95 percent obligation authority for all federal funding apportionments. 5. Fiscal year 2014-15 of the ATP Fund Estimate includes fiscal year 2013-14 carry over funds. 6. Population based on 2010 census data. 7. State and federal resources will remain stable throughout the fund estimate period. BACKGROUND: The Administration proposed the ATP in the January 2013 Governor s Budget proposal, but due to the complex nature of the programs, and the scope of the changes proposed, the Legislature chose to defer action on this proposal when adopting the June 15 th Budget package and instead froze funds for these purposes and inserted intent language that the ATP would be developed before the end of the 2014 legislative session. Caltrans improves mobility across California

CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS Reference No.: 4.4 CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION December 11-12, 2013 Page 2 of 2 The new ATP will divide approximately $124.2 million for active transportation projects between the state and regions subject to guidelines that will be adopted by the Commission. This replaces the current system of small-dedicated grant programs, which fund programs like Safe Routes to Schools, bicycle programs, and recreational trails. The intent of combining this funding is to improve flexibility and reduce the administrative burden of having several small independent grant programs. The ATP, as articulated in SB 99 and AB 101, signed into law September 26, 2013, differs from the Administration's initial proposal in several areas. These changes reflect compromises reached with various stakeholders and mirror concerns raised about the proposal in budget hearings, including: 1. Funding for the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program continues to remain a stand-alone program administered by the Natural Resource Agency instead of being consolidated in the ATP. 2. The Safe Routes to Schools program is guaranteed at least $24 million of funding from the Program funds for three years. Of this amount, at least $7.2 million is available for noninfrastructure program needs including the continuation of technical assistance by the state. In the original proposal, the Safe Routes to Schools program had no funding minimum. 3. This proposal includes a requirement that 25 percent of all ATP funds benefit disadvantaged communities, an addition to the January proposal. 4. The state will not exercise its option to opt out of using federal funds transportation funds for recreational trails, which was initially part of the administration's proposal. In addition, the Department of Parks and Recreation will retain $3.4 million of federal funds for recreational trails. RESOLUTION G-13-17: BE IT RESOLVED that the California Transportation Commission does hereby adopt the 2014 ATP Fund Estimate, as presented by the Department on December 11, 2013, with programming in the 2014 ATP to be based on the statutory funding identified. Attachment Caltrans improves mobility across California

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP) PROPOSAL FUND ESTIMATE ($ in thousands) 2-Year 3-Year 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Total Total RESOURCES STATE RESOURCES Beginning Balance $0 $0 State Highway Account 34,200 34,200 34,200 68,400 102,600 State Resources Subtotal $34,200 $34,200 $34,200 $68,400 $102,600 FEDERAL RESOURCES Transportation Alternative Program (TAP) $63,650 $63,650 $63,650 $127,300 $190,950 TAP Recreational Trails 1,900 1,900 1,900 3,800 5,700 Other Federal 19,950 19,950 19,950 39,900 59,850 Federal Resources Subtotal $85,500 $85,500 $85,500 $171,000 $256,500 TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE $119,700 $119,700 $119,700 $239,400 $359,100 DISTRIBUTION URBAN REGIONS (MPO Administered) State ($13,221) ($13,221) ($13,221) ($26,442) ($39,663) Federal (34,659) (34,659) (34,659) (69,318) (103,977) Urban Regions Subtotal ($47,880) ($47,880) ($47,880) ($95,760) ($143,640) SMALL URBAN & RURAL REGIONS (State Administered) State ($4,829) ($4,829) ($4,829) ($9,658) ($14,487) Federal (7,141) (7,141) (7,141) (14,282) (21,423) Small Urban & Rural Regions Subtotal ($11,970) ($11,970) ($11,970) ($23,940) ($35,910) STATEWIDE COMPETITION (State Administered) State ($16,150) ($16,150) ($16,150) ($32,300) ($48,450) Federal (43,700) (43,700) (43,700) (87,400) (131,100) Statewide Competition Subtotal ($59,850) ($59,850) ($59,850) ($119,700) ($179,550) TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ($119,700) ($119,700) ($119,700) ($239,400) ($359,100) Notes: Individual numbers may not add to total due to independent rounding. Final dollar amounts may vary based on actual apportionment and obligational authority by FHWA or any changes in Federal guidance.

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP) PROPOSAL URBAN REGION SHARES ($ in thousands) FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 URBAN REGIONS FEDERAL TAP FEDERAL OTHER STATE TOTAL Disadvantaged Communities* MTC Region $ 10,503 $ 3,829 $ 5,816 $ 20,149 $ 5,037 SACOG Region 2,945 1,218 2,247 6,410 1,602 SCAG Region 28,985 9,667 12,213 50,865 12,716 Fresno COG (Fresno UZA) 1,118 498 1,005 2,622 655 Kern COG (Bakersfield) 895 450 1,021 2,366 591 SANDAG (San Diego UZA) 5,052 1,658 2,013 8,722 2,180 San Joaquin COG (Stockton) 633 367 931 1,931 483 Stanislaus COG (Modesto) 612 275 562 1,450 362 Tulare CAG (Visalia) 375 237 634 1,246 311 Total $ 51,119 $ 18,199 $ 26,442 $ 95,760 $ 23,940 FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 URBAN REGIONS FEDERAL TAP FEDERAL OTHER STATE TOTAL Disadvantaged Communities* MTC Region $ 5,252 $ 1,915 $ 2,908 $ 10,075 $ 2,519 SACOG Region 1,472 609 1,123 3,205 801 SCAG Region 14,493 4,833 6,106 25,432 6,358 Fresno COG (Fresno UZA) 559 249 503 1,311 328 Kern COG (Bakersfield) 448 225 510 1,183 296 SANDAG (San Diego UZA) 2,526 829 1,006 4,361 1,090 San Joaquin COG (Stockton) 317 183 465 966 241 Stanislaus COG (Modesto) 306 138 281 725 181 Tulare CAG (Visalia) 187 118 317 623 156 Total $ 25,559 $ 9,100 $ 13,221 $ 47,880 $ 11,970 Notes: Individual numbers may not add to total due to independent rounding. Final dollar amounts may vary based on actual apportionment and obligational authority by FHWA or any changes in Federal guidance. *Per Senate Bill 99, ATP guidelines shall include a process to ensure no less than 25 percent of overall program funds benefit disadvantaged communities.