How we investigate concerns about a doctor

Similar documents
How to complain about a doctor

How to complain about an optician

Fitness to Practise. guidance for employers

Nursing and Midwifery Council: changes to governing legislation

Making sure all licensed doctors have the necessary knowledge of English to practise safely in the UK

What to expect from your doctor: a guide for patients

Allegations of insufficient knowledge of English

NHS Governance Clinical Governance General Medical Council

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Date: 07/11/2017. Medical practitioner s name: Dr Umashankar VELLAIAH DURAI

Northern Ireland Social Care Council. NISCC (Registration) Rules 2017

Good medical practice

Guidance for decision makers on assessing risk in cases involving health concerns

Ready for revalidation. Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation

Part(s) of the register: RM, Registered Midwife (8 May 2014)

Amending the Certificate of Current Professional Status template

Good decision making: Investigations and threshold criteria guidance

Leadership and management for all doctors

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

HEALTH PRACTITIONERS COMPETENCE ASSURANCE ACT 2003 COMPLAINTS INVESTIGATION PROCESS

Corporate strategy : an ambition for change

Guide to assist you in making a complaint about a pharmacist or pharmacy

Public Minutes of the Investigation Committee

General Dental Council and General Medical Council initial stages audit review

Northern Ireland Social Care Council

Part(s) of the register: Registered nurse sub part 2 Adult nursing L2 October 1980 Registered nurse sub part 1 Adult nursing L1 Sept 1998

Annual review of performance 2016/17. General Osteopathic Council

Policy on Referral of a Registrant to the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC)

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 28/02/ /03/2018

AND CHIET CHEE JANSON ( ) DETERMINATION OF A SUBSTANTIVE HEARING NOVEMBER 2017

Nursing and Midwifery Council:

Introducing the New NMC Code and revalidation. New professional standards for nurses and midwives

NHSGG&C Referring Registrants to the Nursing & Midwifery Council Policy

Handbook for performance assessors

18 Month Interim Suspension Order

St. James s Place Foundation Grants 2015 Hospice Enabled Dementia Care Information and criteria

Cosmetic procedures: what do I need to consider?

Sharing Information at First Entry to Registers September 2008

All registered healthcare professionals pay a registration fee The fee for Nurses and midwives is comparable to other healthcare professionals

Introducing the New NMC Code. New professional standards for nurses and midwives

Review of Standard 3.4 religious or moral beliefs interim update

Safe to Practise Health Assessment Form

Hearing Fitness to Practise allegations together guidance

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Dates: 02/07/ /07/2018. GMC reference number:

Who regulates health and social care professionals?

Raising a concern about an HCPC approved education or training programme

Safeguarding Policy Children and Adults at Risk

Fitness to practise key information 2017

NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE, ENGLAND NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE ACT Mental Health Act 1983 Approved Clinician (General) Directions 2008

Code of Conduct for business registrants

Independence in Fitness to Practise Adjudication update

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Thinking of reporting a concern to us? A guide for employers and locum agencies

Regulation and Inspection Social Care 2016 Act Frequently asked questions

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Revised guidance for doctors on giving advice to patients on assisted suicide

Nursing associates Consultation on the regulation of a new profession

A public consultation on changes to our fitness to practise function. Ensuring patient safety, enabling professionalism

LOCAL SUPERVISING AUTHORITY WEST OF SCOTLAND WORK PLAN

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Rank Foundation grant programme 2017 Information and criteria

NHS Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group

Justice Committee. Apologies (Scotland) Act 2016 (Excepted Proceedings) Regulations Written submission from the Nursing and Midwifery Council

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Hearing 6 7 September 2018

Information for employers and managers. The fitness to practise process

Fitness to Practise Committee Hearing March and 17 May NMC, 61 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4AE. (6 July 2000)

Procedures for initiating a referral to. Requesting the DHSSPS to issue an ALERT

HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE*

How the GP can support a person with dementia

Foreword. Jackie Smith Chief Executive and Registrar. 17 November Nursing and Midwifery Council Page 2 of 36

NICE Charter Who we are and what we do

MAKING AND USING VISUAL AND AUDIO RECORDINGS OF PATIENTS

Conduct & Competence Committee Substantive Meeting

Skills for Care and the Care Bill frequently asked questions

The Code. Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives

How CQC monitors, inspects and regulates independent doctors and clinics providing primary care

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

21 st. to our. fees. domiciliary rules Code Employing. Social Care

Accountable to: Chief Clinical (Accountable) Officer

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Issue of Health Professional Alert Notices

Objective structured clinical examination Overview of requirements

WHAT TO DO IF CALLED TO GIVE EVIDENCE AT A FITNESS TO PRACTISE INQUIRY

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee

distinction as to race, religion, age or disability, and in compliance with relevant legislation.

Conduct and Competence Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing. Tuesday 11 October 2016

Health examination report

March The Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland A Guide to Fitness to Practise

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing October 2017

FUNDRAISING SUPPORT FOR SMALLER CHARITIES

Managing Poor Performance and Doctors in Difficulty

Nursing & Midwifery Council:

Practice Guidance: Large Scale Investigations

Code of Practice for Social Care Employers

Annual review of performance 2016/17. General Pharmaceutical Council

Health Professions Council Education and Training Committee 28 th September 2006 Regulation of healthcare support workers (HCSWs)

Corporate plan Moving towards better regulation. Page 1

Standards of conduct, ethics and performance

Good Medical Practice (2001) This guidance was withdrawn in November 2006 and is no longer in effect. It is provided here for information only.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITIES COMMITTEE AGENDA. 4th Meeting, 2018 (Session 5) Wednesday 31 January 2018

Report on Qualitative Consultation amongst Users

Transcription:

How we investigate concerns about a doctor Working with doctors Working for patients

Making limited initial enquiries before deciding whether to investigate Sometimes we carry out a provisional enquiry to decide whether or not to investigate the concerns fully. This involves getting one or two easily obtainable pieces of information, such as: medical records. coroner s report. local investigation report. We may also seek expert medical opinion or, in some circumstances, the opinions of the doctor s responsible officer to inform our decision-making. These enquiries are usually completed within 63 days. What if we decide there are no issues that we need to investigate ourselves? If the concerns don t require us to restrict or stop the doctor from practising medicine in the UK, we may refer concerns to the doctor s responsible officer, or employers and organisations where the doctor works. They are often better placed to give an explanation and assess whether there are any wider problems that need to be addressed.

When a serious concern about a doctor s behaviour, performance, or health is raised, we investigate to see if there is a risk to patient safety or the public s confidence in doctors. We normally only investigate concerns that could require us to restrict or stop the doctor from practising medicine in the UK. We explain what we do if the concerns aren t as serious over the page, including if we decide to make some initial enquiries to better understand the concerns. If we decide to investigate the concerns, an interim orders tribunal may restrict the doctor s practice or suspend them while we gather information. This action may be necessary for the protection of the public, or it s in the public or the doctor s interest to do so. The diagram opposite outlines what we do to investigate concerns. You can find more information on our website: www.gmc-uk.org/concerns/

Seek consent from the patient and/or the complainant, to share the concerns raised with the doctor and to get medical records, if required. Share the concerns with the doctor, asking for details of their work and if they want to comment on the concerns. By law, we must carry out the tasks in this diagram before we can decide if a doctor s fitness to practise may be impaired. It takes six months to complete these tasks. When we re investigating complex allegations, it can take longer to collect evidence. Share the concerns with the doctor s responsible officer, employers, and organisations where the doctor works. +6 months Performance assessments +3 months Language and health assessments +2 months Expert reports and witness statements Gather evidence to assess the doctor s fitness to practise, which can make the investigation last longer depending on the type of concerns (see opposite). +2 weeks Medical records Tribunals usually take an extra 9 months or more to finish. Share all the evidence with the doctor for comments. We may share some information with the patient, responsible officer, or employers. Refer the doctor to the MPTS for a medical practitioners tribunal hearing to decide whether the doctor s fitness to practise is impaired. Two senior decision-makers called case examiners (medical and lay) consider all the evidence to assess whether the doctor s fitness to practise may be impaired. The doctor s fitness to practise is not impaired. The hearing ends with no further action or a warning is issued. OR The doctor s fitness to practise is impaired. The hearing ends with no further action, conditions, suspension, or erasure. Case ends without a hearing, resulting in: no further action being taken the doctor being given advice the doctor being given a warning the doctor agreeing to undertakings.

Commonly used terms Advice highlights standards set out in Good medical practice for future reference. Conditions restrict the doctor s right to work as imposed by a tribunal. Erasure removes a doctor s name from the medical register, so they cannot work as a doctor in the UK. Fitness to practise describes whether a doctor is following our standards and safe to treat patients. Interim orders tribunals can suspend or restrict a doctor s right to work while an investigation continues. Medical practitioners tribunal service (MPTS) hears the most serious cases where the GMC considers that a doctor s fitness to practise is likely to be impaired. Responsible officers are licensed doctors. They deal with fitness to practise concerns, including approving any arrangements for a doctor who is subject to undertakings or conditions to practise safely. Suspension removes a doctor from the medical register temporarily. Undertakings restrict the doctor s right to work, as agreed between us and the doctor. Warnings mark where the doctor s practice goes against our standards, even though their fitness to practise is not impaired. Code: GMC/HICAD/0317 The GMC is a charity registered in England and Wales (1089278) and Scotland (SC037750).