https://helsedirektoratet.no/english Regulatory and ethics bodies involved in approval process

Similar documents
Regulatory and ethics bodies involved in approval process. Competent Authority/-ies (CA)/ For certain types of MDs Ethics committee(s)

New European Union Clinical Trial Regulations

Annual report 2016 The Health and Social Services Ombudsmen in Norway

Commission Guidelines for the implementation of the Clinical Trials Regulation NTA Ethics Oslo

Questions and answers on the procedure of PIP compliance verification at EMA, and on paediatric rewards

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

The implementation of the Clinical Trial Regulation (CTR, n 536/2014) in Belgium. and impact on the ethical review process

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS: SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING

IDENTIFYING, RECORDING AND REPORTING ADVERSE EVENTS FOR CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF MEDICAL DEVICES

MEDICINES FOR HUMAN USE (CLINICAL TRIALS) REGULATIONS Memorandum of understanding between MHRA, COREC and GTAC

Procedure for handling applications for authorisation and review reports under REACH

European IVD Regulations and Risk Based Classification. An Overview for Global Quality Professionals

This Agreement dated DD/MM/YYYY (the Effective Date ) is between

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON NORWAY GRANTS FROM INNOVATION NORWAY

Quality Assurance in Clinical Research at RM/ICR. GCP Compliance Team, Clinical R&D

Grünenthal Norway AS - Methodological Note

Sponsor Responsibilities. Roles and Responsibilities. EU Directives. UK Law

Regulations concerning Administrative Arrangements

FUGE- a survey of user satisfaction

Guide to Incident Reporting for In-vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices

Guideline for the notification of serious breaches of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 or the clinical trial protocol

NBOG Report for the period

ETHICS COMMITTEE: ROLE, RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS K.R.CHANDRAMOHANAN NAIR DEPARTMENT OF ANATOMY, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Research Governance Framework 2 nd Edition, Medicine for Human Use (Clinical Trial) Regulations 2004

Changes in the Medical Device Legislation; the day after. Jan Bart Hak 1

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Reporting Serious Breaches in Clinical Research

Brussels, 12 June 2014 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 10855/14. Interinstitutional File: 2012/0266 (COD) 2012/0267 (COD)

Intertek Health, Environmental & Regulatory Services

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Trial Management: Trial Master Files and Investigator Site Files

Research Staff Training

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety

BEST PRACTICE GUIDE FOR DECENTRALISED AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION PROCEDURES

Standard operating procedure

Scientific Advice and Protocol Assistance at the EMEA

GCP INSPECTION CHECKLIST

Marie-Claire Rickard, RG and GCP Manager Jimena Lovos, Quality Assurance Manager Elizabeth Clough, R&D Governance Operations Manager

ECHA and the implementation of REACH,CLP and other tasks

Delivery time frame for the EU portal and EU database

ISO14155: 2011 Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects - Good Clinical Practice - ISO TC194 WG4 Madoka Murakami PMDA, Japan

Document Title: Document Number:

ENOVA Promotion of energy from renewable sources Scheme

The Request for Proposal consists of the following documents, and should be read in conjunction with any Addenda issued:

Governance %%.4- r2&% Queen s University Belfast. Standard Operating Procedure Research Governance. r2.aoc7. Research and Enterprise

Law on Medical Devices

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL JUSTICE

GUIDANCE NOTES ON PROJECT REPORTING

European Medicines Agency guidance for applicants seeking scientific advice and protocol assistance

1.4 Our main role is to protect the health and wellbeing of those who use or need to use our registrants services.

WORKING CONSOLIDATED TEXT

Research Adverse Event and Safety Reporting Procedures Outcome Statement: Title:

Version Number: 003. On: September 2017 Review Date: September 2020 Distribution: Essential Reading for: Information for: Page 1 of 13

First inspection of a Legal Representative in the EU by local authority

Version September 2014

Version Number: 004 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead:

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Guidance on the Biocidal Products Regulation

EARLY ACCESS IN BELGIUM: STATUS UPDATE. Veerle Kempeneers & Rudy De Cock - Pfizer Kristel De Gauquier pharma.be

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF SHIPS' BALLAST WATER AND SEDIMENTS, 2004

Joint Statement on the Application of Good Clinical Practice to Training for Researchers

Standard Operating Procedure

European network of paediatric research (EnprEMA)

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

Keele Clinical Trials Unit

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

NABH Accreditation Standards for Clinical Trials and application form. Indian Society for Clinical Research

Guide to Incident Reporting for General Medical Devices and Active Implantable Medical Devices

Safety Reporting in Clinical Research Policy Final Version 4.0

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Reporting Urgent Safety Measures in Clinical Research

ANNUAL REPORT INNOVATION NORWAY

MHRA Findings Dissemination Joint Office Launch Jan Presented by: Carolyn Maloney UHL R&D Manager

Guidance on the preparation of dossiers for harmonised classification and labelling (CLH) under Regulation (EC) No.

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Medical devices briefing for patients: Patient safety in the new Regulation

Journal of Health Economics

Course program. Good Clinical Practice (GCP) course for surgeons

Overview of the IMB s. Good Clinical Practice. Deirdre O Regan GCP/Pharmacovigilance. GCP Seminar Dublin, 27 th January 2010.

EFTA Surveillance Authority Rue Belliard 35 B-1040 Brussel. Your ref

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 710. Good Clinical Practice AUDIT AND INSPECTION. NNUH UEA Joint Research Office. Acting Research Services Manager

Once the feasibility assessment has been conducted the study team will be notified via (Appendix 3) of the outcome and whether the study is;

REACH Evaluation. Graham Lloyd Regulatory/Technical. REACH in Practice Conference 1 June, Steptoe & Johnson LLP & Regulatory Compliance Ltd

Mutual Recognition of Research Ethics Review between SingHealth CIRB and NHG DSRB

SOUTH DAKOTA MEMBER GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES PROBLEM RESOLUTION

CMDv/BPG/002. BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Veterinary Decentralised Procedure (DCP)

European network of paediatric research (EnprEMA)

DRAFT OPINION. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/0018(COD) of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

BIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST

European Medicines Agency Inspections ANNEX V TO PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA: PHASE I UNITS

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

FINAL STATUS DOCUMENT

Regulation on the implementation of the European Economic Area (EEA) Financial Mechanism

Model Agreement between Lead Partners and partners of an INTERREG IVC project (Partnership Agreement) 1

Guidelines. Application template Call 2018 KA2 - Cooperation for Innovation and the Exchange of Good Practices KA229 - School Exchange Partnerships

Document Number: 006. Version: 1. Date ratified: Name of originator/author: Heidi Saunders, Senior Portfolio Coordinator

CLINICAL RESEARCH POLICY

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON DIRECTIVE 2005/50/EC ON THE RECLASSIFICATION

Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland N.B. Unofficial translation. Legally valid only in Finnish and Swedish

Transcription:

Medical Devices - NORWAY Competent authority Contact Details Contact Name 1 Norwegian Directorate of Health Email Department medisinsk.utstyr@ helsedir.no Address PO Box 7000; St. Olavs plass ZIP/City 0130 Oslo Country Norway (NO) Web address https://helsedirektoratet.no/english No local CA. Trial Authorisation / Registration / Notification Regulatory and ethics bodies involved in approval process Competent Authority/-ies (CA)/ For certain types of MDs Ethics committee(s) Agency for data protection CA - Submission for authorisation mandatory for MD CE-marked, use outside label MD CE-marked, use outside label + IMP MD without label MD without label + IMP CA - Registration/ notification without approval required for CA - Submission required to National CA CE-marked MD used within label are exempted from any notification obligation to CA A notification must sent to the national competent authority (NCA) in all EEA/EU states where the investigation is going to take place. Clinical investigations of CE marked devices utilised for their intended purpose do only require notification to EC! For national registration, write to: Kliniskestudier.helsenorge.no Registration at clinicaltrials.gov may be a requirement for publication in certain journals. Submission to CA and EC to be performed in the following order

Submission of Application Responsible for study submission Sponsor Entitled to study submission Prerequisites for submission Guidance on submission of application A guidance document (pdf) inlcuding required documentation is available on the Directorate of Health website in section: Helsedirektoratet.no > English > Medical devices > Regulatory information (Notification of a clinical investigation of a medical device) Combination study: Additional documentation is required when the investigational MD incorporates a substance, which (if used separately) may be considered to be a MP as defined in Articale 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC. In this case, a scientific opinion from a CA designated by a member state or from the EMA shall be obtained on request from a Notified Body. Submission Format Format option(s) Email Regular mail Preferred format Standard application form available Standard application form Standard Notification form (doc) and guidance document (pdf) inlcuding required documentation is available on the Directorate of Health website in section: Helsedirektoratet.no > English > Medical devices > Regulatory information (Notification of a clinical investigation of a medical device) Language of Submission Language(s) of application Norwegian English Preferred language of application English accepted Partly, not for all documents Documents mandatory to be in official national language Information material, Documents and Forms intended for study participants and patient information Documents mandatory to be in local language of study site Documents mandatory to be in language of the study participant Submission Fees Fees for trial submission mandatory

Fees Industry studies: NKR 10.000.- Amendments/Changes: NKR 5.000.- Academic studies: no fees Waiver for academic (non-commercial) studies possible Timelines Authorisation General timespan (max nr days) 60 Mode of approval (General) Tacit (Silent) Explicit approval possible before expiration of time period Clock-stop possible if complementary information requested Timespan counted from Date of submission of valid application NB! Application to CA can be submitted before EC s vote has been issued. However, the 60 day time period formally will not formally start until all required documentation has been received. The CA can not take its decision before having received the EC s opinion. Amendments/ Substantial Amendments (SA) Notification mandatory for Authorisation mandatory for Significant amendments to the clinical investigation plan Responsible for submission of SA Timeline for approval of SA (max nr days) Safety Reporting Responsible for AE reporting to CA Sponsor Sponsor must declare reportable events to National CA CA(s) of EU&EFTA Member States concerned Reportable AEs SAE (Serious Adverse Event) SUSAR being life-thereatening or leading to death must be reported All other SUSARs SAE /SADE must be reported Immediately (Reportable events must be fully recorded)

National standard reporting form available European standard SAE reporting form MEDDEV 2.7/3 to be used Standard Reporting Form European MEDDEV 2.7/3. Reporting format - Options Preferred format Provision of Annual safety report mandatory Annual safety report shall be provided by sponsor to National CA CA(s) of EU&EFTA Member States concerned Applicable national legal framework/ Reference Regulation of 15 December 2005 no 1690 on medical devices, Annexes AIMU VII and ØMU X (no) Investigator shall report SAE to Reporting timeline End of Trial End of trial declaration mandatory for All clinical investigations requiring authorisation by CA Responsible for End of trial declaration Regular Termination - Declaration timespan (max nr days) Timespan counted from Early/premature Termination - Declaration timespan (max nr days) Reasons for early termination shall be clearly stated Ethics committee Contact Details Contact Name 1 Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics REK/ REC Contact Name 2 4 REC according to geographical region: Contact Name 3 (1) REC South East; (2) REC West; (3) REC Central; (4) REC North;

Country Norway (NO) E-Mail post@ helseforskning.etikkom.no Web address https://helseforskning.etikkom.no/ REC South East : Vestfold, Buskerud, Telemark, Aust-Agder, Vest-Agder, Akershus, Østfold, Hedmark, Oppland and Oslo REC West: Rogaland, Hordaland and Sogn og Fjordane REC Central : Møre og Romsdal, Sør-Trøndelag and Nord-Trøndelag REC North: Nordland, Troms and Finnmark ad Email (post@ helseforskning.etikkom.no): the name of the respective REC (South East, West, Central, North) should be included in the subject field The secretariats of the individual RECs can also be contacted directly by telephone, email or via their office addresses, provided on the REK website in section Committees and Meetings. Ethical Review General Submission for Ethical review mandatory for All research projects involving humans Submission to CA and EC to be performed in the following order Research projects involving human beings or any kind of human tissue, cells etc. need approval from a Regional Ethics Committee (REK/REC). There are 4 REK/REC covering the geographical regions as follows: REC South East : Vestfold, Buskerud, Telemark, Aust-Agder, Vest-Agder, Akershus, Østfold, Hedmark, Oppland and Oslo REC West: Rogaland, Hordaland and Sogn og Fjordane REC Central: Møre og Romsdal, Sør-Trøndelag and Nord-Trøndelag REC North: Nordland, Troms and Finnmark Regulatory and ethics bodies involved in approval process Competent Authority/-ies (CA)/ For certain types of MDs Ethics committee(s) Agency for data protection Single-Centre Studies - Ethical Review Ethical approval (favourable opinion) to be obtained from Regional EC competent for the study site resp. health facility Research projects are assigned to the geographical region in which the investigator has the main place of work. Multi-Centre Studies - Ethical Review Ethical approval (favourable opinion) required from Regional EC (authorised to issue a single opinion) Submission of application required to Regional EC (authorised to issue a single opinion)

Research projects are assigned to the geographical region in which the Principal Investigator has the main place of work. There is a Single opinion procedure: Only one vote (by one EC) shall be issued according to Chapter 3, section 3(4) of Regulation 2009 for clinical trials (en). Submission of Application Responsible for study submission Principal Investigator Investigator Entitled to study submission Prerequisites for submission / approval Guidance on study submission Application Procedure via REK Portal: Submission of application requires a user account for the portal. Further guidance is available on the REK website in section Electronic Application Procedure Submission Format Format option(s) Online portal Preferred format Online portal Online portal REK Portal: Submission of application requires a user account for the portal. Standard application form The electronic Project Application form (Prosjektsøknad) to be used is available once logged on to the portal on the REK website. Guidance on submission format Further guidance is available on the REK website in section Electronic Application Procedure General Communication: All written communications to and from REC shall be in electronic format. Applications and follow-up enquiries (response, amendments, reports and appeals) to REC should be submitted using electronic forms. Other enquiries should be sent via email (to post@ helseforskning.etikkom.no) with the name of the respective REC in the subject field (REC South East, REC West, REC Central or REC North). Language of Submission Language(s) of application Norwegian Preferred language of application English accepted For Attachments (other than information material for study participants); any other Scandinavian language also accepted Documents mandatory to be in official national language

Documents mandatory to be in local language of study site Basic application form Information material, Documents and Forms intended for study participants and patient information Documents mandatory to be in language of study participant Submission Fees Fees for Ethical review mandatory No Fees for Ethical review No fees for academic nor industry Timelines Ethical Review General timespan for single-centre studies (max nr days) A reasonable opinion can be expected within three weeks following the date of the first upcoming meeting of the Committee which will review the application. General timespan for multi-centre studies (max nr days) Same as for single-centre trials External expert advice required: Timespan (max nr days) Timespan counted from Processing times are described on REK website in section: Rules and Procedures > Administrative Procedures for REC > Application Requirements and Processing Times. NB! There are application deadlines applicable to all RECs, published for one year at a time! (available on the REK website in section Application Deadlines) Amendments/ Substantial Amendments (SA) Ethical review mandatory for Responsible for notification of SA Timeline Ethical review of SA (max nr days) Safety Reporting Reportable AEs Investigator shall report SAE to Reporting timeline Responsible for AE reporting to relevant EC(s) SUSAR being life-thereatening or leading to death must be reported

All other SUSAR must be reported SAE/SADE must be reported National Standard Reporting form available Reporting format - Options Preferred reporting format No information available on AE reporting obligations to EC. End of Trial End of trial Declaration mandatory Study specific Requirements Responsible for End of trial Declaration Regular Termination - Declaration timespan (max nr days) Timespan counted from Early/premature Termination - Declaration timespan (max nr days) Study Participants - Informed Consent (IC) Standard IC form (ICF) available Standard IC form (ICF) Templates for Participation Information and Consent is available in Norwegian and English on the REK website in section Deadlines and Forms > Templates for Participation Information and Consent Informed Consent - Definition/ Requirements 'A written, dated and signed statement about participation in a clinical trial which is given by a person who is capable of giving consent. The statement must be made voluntarily after the trial subject has received full information about the nature, significance, scope and risk associated with the trial. If the person is not capable of giving consent, consent is given by the person who can give consent on behalf of the person concerned' Specific requirements regarding to informed consent (including vulnerable populations) are stipulated by Chapter 2 of Regulation 2009 for clinical trials (en) and Chapter 4 of The Health Research Act. Applicable national legal framework/ Reference Chapter 1, Section 1(5) Regulation 2009 for clinical trials (Definition) Chapter 2 of Regulation 2009 for clinical trials Chapter 4 of The Health Research Act

The EC will approve the Informed Consent Form. Study Participants - Vulnerable Population Minors / Children - Studies allowed Incapacitated persons - Studies allowed Emergency situations - Studies allowed Emergency situation without prior consent of patient or proxy - Studies allowed Pregnant or breastfeeding women - Studies allowed Study Participants - Compensation & Reimbursement Reimbursement for study participants No specific provisions Compensation is limited to/provided for Data Protection Notification to DP Authority/ Ombudsmann is mandatory Approval/ authorisation required Specific notification timelines before operations start Language of notification Notification format Data Protection Authority/ Agency - Contact Details The Norwegian Data Protection Authority E-Mail postkasse@ datatilsynet.no Web address https://www.datatilsynet.no/english/ Address P.O.Box 8177 Dep. ZIP/City 0034 Oslo Country Norway (NO)

Notification is mandatory pursuant to section 31 of the Personal Data Act and section 29 of the Personal Health Data Filing Systems Act. Standard notification form (Notification form for processing of personal data) is available on the website of the Norwegian Data Protection Authority (Datatilsynet). Legal framework (on safeguarding the collection, handling, recording, keeping and/or processing of any clinical trial related data and patient files) Insurance Liability insurance or alternative arrangements for damages mandatory for Study participants Responsible for covering insurance Insurance may be provided by: (1) Private Insurance company OR (2) Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation (Norsk Pasientskadeerstatning; NPE) A confirmation or certificate of insurance must be submitted accompanying the application dossier. Quality Assurance/ Quality Control (QA/QC) Monitoring Audit by sponsor Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) National legislation General Information: Applicable Legislation & Conventions Official website providing relevant national legislation available Official website providing relevant national legislation REK website in section Acts of Legislation Official governmental legal database available Official governmental legal database The Lovdata Foundation: Norwegian regulations are publicly available in the legal information system run by the Ministry of Justice and the Faculty of Law in Oslo. English translation of the Norwegian legislation can be found in the Law Library of the University of Oslo. Investigations on Medical Devices Applicable national regulations National Act on Medical Devices

Act on Medical Devices (or comparable national legal framework) Regulation of 15 December 2005 no 1690 on medical devices 4-5, 5-6, Annex/vedlegg AIMU I, AIMU VI, AIMU VII, ØMU I, ØMU VIII, ØMU X) (In Norwegian) International regulatory framework and guidance documents Directive 93/42/EEC (Article 15, Annexes I, VIII, X), directive 90/385/EEC (Article 10, Annexes 1, 6, 7) MEDDEV 2.7/1 Clinical evaluation: Guide for manufacturers and notified bodies (incl. Appendix 1 Clinical Evaluation of Coronary Stents) MEDDEV 2.7/2 Guide for Competent Authorities in making an assessment of clinical investigation notification ISO 14155:2011 Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects - Good clinical practice Data Protection Legal framework (on safeguarding the collection, handling, recording, keeping and/or processing of any clinical trial related data and patient files) National Data Protection Act Other legislation covering DP related issues National DP act Lov om behandling av personopplysninger (personopplysningsloven) - Law on processing of personal data, 14 April 2000 No. 31 ( Personal Data Act (en) ) Definition MD/MD Investigation MD - Definition available in national law MD - Definition Medical Devices (MDs): 'any device intended by the manufacturer to be used for human beings for the purpose of diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease, compensation for an injury or handicap. In addition some devices for control of conception, and devices for disabled fall under the definition.' Medical devices are further defined in Regulation of 15 December 2005 no 1690 on medical devices 1-5a. Active implantable medical device (AIMD): 'any active medical device which is intended to be totally or partially introduced, surgically or medically, into the human body or by medical intervention into a natural orifice, and which is intended to remain after the procedure' (ref Regulation of 15 December 2005 no 1690 medical devices 1-5 d). Investigation of MD - Definition Clinical Evaluation: «The assessment and analysis of clinical data pertaining to a medical device in order to verify the clinical safety and performance of the device when used as intended by the manufacturer» (MEDDEV 2.7.1 Rev.3 Clinical Evaluation: A guide for manufacturers and notified bodies.)