Barbara De la Salle UK NEQAS

Similar documents
Garbage in garbage out! Dr Mike Cornes: Principal Clinical Scientist Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust

Preanalytical Errors in Laboratory - Their Consequences and Measures to Reduce Them

01/12/14. Nomen Omen: Analytical performance goals Performance goals. Performance criteria. Quality specifications

Pathology User Survey

The effect of education and 4-year experience in the evaluation of preanalytical process in a clinical chemistry laboratory

Allen D. Leman Swine Conference

REPOSITIONING OUR CLINICAL LABORATORIES FOR EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT HEALTHCARE DELIVERY. By Prof. Ibironke Akinsete Chairman PathCare Nigeria

PURPOSE: This policy provides an overview of SHANDS Jacksonville Laboratory s commitment to the care and safety of the patients we serve.

THE VALUE OF CAP S Q-PROBES & Q-TRACKS

PT/EQA for the Total Laboratory Testing Cycle: Focus on Pre-Examination

Laboratory Request Form Completion and Specimen Labelling Reference Number:

Pathology Service User Handbook GENERAL SERVICE INFORMATION FOR LABORATORY SERVICE USERS

QC Explained Quality Control for Point of Care Testing

ICSH Guideline for the Communication of Critical FBC Results

SOUTH EASTERN TRUST. Point of Care Testing (POCT) Policy Ellie Duly, Chair POCT Committee. Approval date: Operational Date: November 2014

PRE AND POST EXAMINATION ASPECTS

Internal Quality Assurance Framework Microbiology

Post-analytical factors and their influence on analytical quality specifications

Pathology Quality Review : Outcomes and Update

Job Description. Senior Biomedical Scientists & Head and Deputy Head of Department. Head of Department (Biochemistry) & Blood Sciences Manager

Dominic Cox Royal Free Hospital London Joan Pearson Leeds General Infirmary

CAP Companion Society Meeting at USCAP 2009 Quality Assurance, Error Reduction, and Patient Safety in Anatomic Pathology

Internal Quality Assurance Framework Anatomical Pathology

2/15/2017. Reducing Mislabeled and Unlabeled Specimens In Acuity Adaptable Units

Improving Your POC Program: An Upside Down Map. Sheila K. Coffman MT(ASCP)

Representing 22,000 Laboratory Medicine Specialists Bielorus, Malta, Moldova are the only European Countries that still have to join EFLM

COPY. That all specimens received by the lab are properly labeled by person collecting the specimen

Improving patient safety and infection. Patient Safety Forum Dr J Coleman 1 ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING AND CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT (CDS)

Histopathology National QI Programme Annual Workshop. 10 May 2016

Patient safety and risk management in medical laboratories: theory and practical application

CLIA & Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP) Karen W. Dyer MT(ASCP), DLM Director (Acting) Division of Laboratory Services

Potential challenges when assessing organisational processes for assurance of clinical competence in labs with limited clinical staff resource

Adopt a Professional : Training Report

Preanalytical errors in hospitals. Current research and process-oriented improvement initiatives Labquality Days Helsinki 2009 Olof Wallin, MD/PhD

IQCP. Ensuring Your Laboratory s Compliance With Individualized Quality Control Plans. November/December 2016

Getting results Pathology services in acute and specialist trusts

Policy Subject Index Number Section Subsection Category Contact Last Revised References Applicable To Detail MISSION STATEMENT: OVERVIEW:

BIOMEDICAL SCIENTIST MEDIA INFORMATION 2017

COMPUTERIZED PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY (CPOE)

United Kingdom National Release Centre and Implementation of SNOMED CT

Plan for Quality to Improve Patient Safety at the POC

The Laboratorian as a Clinical Consultant

General Practitioner Pathology - Laboratory Service Provision Policy Policy No: SJH: LabMed (P):003

Laboratory Risk Assessment: IQCP and Beyond. Ron S. Quicho, MS Associate Project Director Standards and Survey Methods, Laboratory July 18, 2017

The prevalence of preanalytical errors in a Croatian ISO accredited laboratory

STANDARDS Point-of-Care Testing

5. Quality Control in Histopathology

CLIA & Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP) Judith Yost Director Division of Laboratory Services

S ince its incorporation in January 1992, Clinical

3/14/2016. The Joint Commission and IQCP. Objectives. Before Getting Started

Organisation of a Clinical Laboratory. Peter O Loughlin SA Pathology

HAEMOVIGILANCE POLICY

POCKET GUIDE TO THE ACCREDITATION STANDARDS (ISO 15189:2014)

Voluntary national programs to track laboratory quality,

: Suzanna Immanuel Place, date of birth : Jakarta, 11 th March 1953 Education : MD FMUI 1978 Profession : Clinical Pathologist (SpPK) FMUI 1984

CME/SAM. Determination of Turnaround Time in the Clinical Laboratory

5/8/2015. Individualized Quality Control Plans (IQCP) Changes to the CMS Quality Requirements. CLIA Quality Control Evolution of the Process

A Sharper Phlebotomy Service

Order Source Misattribution: The Impact on CPOE Metrics

Management of Diagnostic Testing and Screening Procedures Policy

Guidance for MRC units on HTA licence applications for storage of human samples for research purposes

Quality indicators and specifications for strategic and support processes in laboratory medicine

How to Request Laboratory Services

Disclosures. Relevant Financial Relationship(s): Nothing to Disclose. Off Label Usage: Nothing to Disclose 6/1/2017. Quality Indicators

Exploring the Initial Steps of the Testing Process: Frequency and Nature of Pre-Preanalytic Errors

Improving the Pre-Empted Medication Error Reporting System at St. Charles Hospital, Port Jefferson, NY

Clinical Laboratory Science Courses

CLIA s New IQCP Requirements Are in Effect, or Are They?: Implementing Laboratory Risk Management Now to Ensure Success

Pro-QCP SAMPLE REPORT

Referral Laboratories

Benchmarking Laboratory Quality

QUALITY ASSURANCE IN LABORATORY PRACTICES (Working Paper for the Technical Discussions)

Medical Laboratory Scientist/ Technologist Pathology Service. Medical Laboratory Scientist/Technologist. Pathology Service

Lab Quality Confab Process Improvement Institute. New Orleans, LA. John Waugh 11/3/2015

Outline. Jeff Seiple Administrative Director Holy Spirit Hospital. Introduction

POL:00:QP:001:03:NIBT PAGE 1 of 8. Document Details Document Number: POL:00:QP:001:03:NIBT No. of Appendices: 1 Supersedes Number: 00:02:QP:001:NIBT

Technological Approaches for Positive Product Recipient Identification

Laboratory Services. Specimen Collection & Rejection Procedure

Objectives. Pre & Post-Analytic Phases What is Important? Potential for Errors in Healthcare. What is the goal of health care?

Specimen and Request Form Labelling Policy

Clinical Laboratories West Virginia University Hospitals. Resident Orientation

COMMISSIONING SUPPORT PROGRAMME. Standard operating procedure

Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust. Job Description Haematology

Linda Cutter / Dr Charles Heatley. GP Practices and Community Pharmacies

SPSP Medicines. Prepared by: NHS Ayrshire and Arran

NHS. Top tips to overcome the challenge of commissioning diagnostic services. NHS Improvement - Diagnostics. NHS Improvement Diagnostics CANCER

From customer satisfaction survey to corrective actions in laboratory services in a university hospital

An error management system in a veterinary clinical laboratory

SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER, SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF LABORATORY MEDICINE. Rules and Regulations

Wireless working in hospitals: Improving efficiency and safety of out-ofhours

Laboratory QA. Quality-Improvement Measures as Effective Ways of Preventing Laboratory Errors. Rachna, Agarwal, MD 1 * ABSTRACT

REQUEST FORM AND SPECIMEN LABELLING POLICY CG45

Northern Ireland Peer Review of Cancer MDTs. EVIDENCE GUIDE FOR LUNG MDTs

Strategies for Good Communication of the Medical Laboratory Staff with the TB Program and Healthcare Providers

Plan for Quality to Improve Patient Safety at the POC

Issue of Health Professional Alert Notices

Global standards and interoperability in Australian healthcare

How can oncology practices deliver better care? It starts with staying connected.

Document Number: QAQC.81.Proc Manual: Quality Assurance Quality Control. Version: 002 Publish Date: March 2013

Lessons for Transfusion Laboratory Staff. from the 2007 SHOT Report SHOT SERIOUS HAZARDS OF TRANSFUSION

Transcription:

Barbara De la Salle UK NEQAS

Right Blood Right Result - Right Time Every Time

Right Test Right Action Right Patient Right Sample Right Result Right Experience Right Time Right Cost

Systematic quality improvement Pressure to improve nonlaboratory activities Demonstration of leadership by pathology providers Cost reduction Key Assurance Indicators

Design Working Group members Pre-pilot 10-20 selected UK participants Pilot 30-50 UK participants

Design Working Group members Pre-pilot 10-20 selected UK participants Pilot 30-50 UK participants

Type I: Registration of procedures Type II: Circulation of samples simulating errors Type III: Registration of errors/adverse events Gunn BB Kristensen et al. Biochemica Medica 2014; 24 (1): 114-22

Type I: Registration of procedures Type II: Circulation of samples simulating errors Type III: Registration of errors/adverse events Gunn BB Kristensen et al. Biochemica Medica 2014; 24 (1): 114-22 EQA error rates and causes gathered through corrective and preventative actions or root cause analysis investigation

59 quality indicators 34 Pre-analytical 7 Analytical 15 Post-analytical 3 Support processes Sciacovelli L et al. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49(5):835-844 Plebani M et al. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013; 51(1): 187-195

Appropriate request Patient identification Request form Order entry Sample identification Sample collection Sample transportation Sample rejection

Timeliness of reports Accuracy of results reporting Timeliness and effectiveness of critical values reporting Effectiveness of interpretative comments Effectiveness of clinical audit

Inappropriate test request Frequency of requesting Justification of request Special requirements Communication of urgency/critical samples Correct/adequate clinical information Variability in clinical practice General practice v. Hospital Wrong blood in tube Patient identification errors

Inappropriate test request Frequency of requesting Justification of request Special requirements Communication of urgency/critical samples Correct/adequate clinical information Variability in clinical practice General practice v. Hospital Wrong blood in tube when identifiable

Wrong site for sampling Sample identification Barcode Sample time/temperature Sample quality Fill volume Anticoagulant Order of draw Mixing Packaging and transport Lost samples

Wrong site for sampling when identifiable Sample identification Barcode Sample time/temperature where critical Sample quality Fill volume Anticoagulant Order of draw Mixing Packaging and transport Lost samples - how do we know?

Turnaround time for report authorisation Time between authorisation and receipt Communication of critical results Wrong person/wrong place informed Out of hours Competency of lab staff/recipient Transcription error Results lost Results not seen No audit trail

Turnaround time for report authorisation Time between authorisation and receipt Communication of critical results Wrong person/wrong place informed Out of hours Competency of lab staff/recipient Transcription error Results lost Results not seen No audit trail

Inappropriate interpretation Lab Clinician Inappropriate/no instruction from lab Urgency of action not conveyed Inappropriate action/inaction by clinician Results not used clinically GENERAL PRACTICE v HOSPITAL CLINICIAN

Identification indicators (2): Patient identification Sample identification Sample quality indicators (6) Inappropriate sample type or container Insufficient sample volume Sample transportation Sample quality (Blood Sciences) Sample quality (Microbiology) Contaminated blood cultures

Timeliness of reports Accuracy of results reporting Timeliness and effectiveness of critical results reporting in-patients only

Blood Sciences Haematology Chemistry Immunology Microbiology Pilot: UK Laboratories only Next phase: Republic of Ireland Then: Possible availability through EQALM or similar collaborative working Later roll out to Histopathology and Cytology

Web only service Wolfson EQA database (SQL) Pan UK NEQAS centre set up Input screen developed Vocabulary drafted to generate analyte codes Input items (analytes) # failures # opportunities (requests/patients/reports) Data processing Defects per million opportunities Sigma metric

Pre-pre-pilot : WG members only Plausibility/feasibility check Data not attributable to participants Volatile identifier codes and passwords Feedback: Standardisation of data input terminology Clarification of time period for data capture Glossary needed, as well as standard access instructions

To define: Request Sample/specimen Patient identification failure Sample identification failure Blood Sciences Microbiology Quality rejections Etc.

Design Working Group members Pre-pilot 10-20 selected UK participants Pilot 30-50 UK participants

Open NOW Selected laboratories only (10-20) Haematology Chemistry Microbiology Volatile identifiers / passwords Data not attributable to participants To assess practicality and preferences

Ownership and collaboration Stakeholder focus Who will pay? Feasibility Practical data collection Different LIMS systems Networks vs individual sites GP vs hospital Service reorganisation Glossary

16 suggestions Adverse incident monitoring service Key Quality Indicator System End to end quality assessment and so on... UK NEQAS Pre and Post Analytical Quality Monitoring Service

Jen Atherton Ian Mellors David Bullock Christine Walton UK NEQAS Administration UK NEQAS Pre and Post Analytical WG Participants brave enough to take part