AN INVESTIGATION INTO WHAT DRIVES YOUR DONORS TO GIVE

Similar documents
What Women Want Understanding the Needs and Objectives of Women s Philanthropic Giving

2010 HOLIDAY GIVING. Research and Insights into the Most Charitable Time of the Year THIS RESEARCH INDICATES:

The Blackbaud Index. Overall Giving, Online Giving, and Foundation Index Trends

ontents About the Survey... 1

Part 1 Uncovering the Value of Retained Revenue. Sustainers in Focus. Blackbaud Institute for Philanthropic Impact

The Blackbaud Index. Canada

the definition of insanity who are the affluent in america Today? Executive Summary Contents Wealth and Philanthropy in America White Paper

Current Trends in Philanthropy and Charitable Giving. Eric Javier and Sevil Miyhandar, CCS Fundraising January 26, 2018

CONDUCTED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE INDIANA UNIVERSITY LILLY FAMILY SCHOOL OF PHILANTHROPY

UK GIVING 2012/13. an update. March Registered charity number

How To Use Data To Manage Your Nonprofit

Beyond #GivingTuesday Crafting a Winning Year-End Strategy

Philanthropy in a Turbulent Economy

Indiana Grantmakers Response to the Economic Crisis

Peer-to-Peer Event Fundraising Benchmark Study

2014 Giving Report. A Look at Fidelity Charitable Donors and How They Give. REPORT SPOTLIGHT How Donors Approach Philanthropy as a Family

Building a Donor Constituency Where None Exists Not an Impossible Mission

The Australian Community Trends Report

NOZA changed the way I look at giving potential. I use it daily and could not live without it. We use NOZA to look for the experience of philanthropy.

Volunteers and Donors in Arts and Culture Organizations in Canada in 2013

The. Point of. Impact. Empowering Champions for a Better World. The Point of Impact

Peer to Peer Fundraising

The Importance of a Major Gifts Program and How to Build One

Donor and Grantee Customer Satisfaction Survey Findings

Fundraising Effectiveness Project

2017 Annual Giving Report

AFP First Coast Wednesday, July 20, 2016

The Nonprofit Research Collaborative. November 2010 Fundraising Survey

Target Analytics Blackbaud 1

Terms of Reference. Digital Fundraising Consultant. Private Sector Partnerships Service (PSP), UNHCR London, UK

Profiting from the Latest Research in Online Fundraising

Maximizing Giving Days and Ensuring a Successful Year End Giving Initiative

Trends in Nonprofit Accountability and Its Impact on Reporting Requirements

TIMES ARE TOUGH for raising financial support for seminaries.

Talking Pointss. ng in 2009.

RESEARCH AUSTRALIA 2012 PUBLIC OPINION POLL RESULTS AUGUST 2012

will now display archived data going back to January This will Interested in seeing how your organization is trending against The

Independent School Fundraising. By Patricia Voigt & Kelly Grattan, Senior Consultants, Schultz & Williams

DONOR RETENTION TOOLKIT

Association of Fundraising Professionals State of Fundraising 2005 Report

The. The. Cygnus Donor Survey. Cygnus Donor Survey. Where philanthropy is headed in Penelope Burk TORONTO CHICAGO YORK, UK

FY 2017 Year In Review

Membership, Year End Gifts & The Power of Thank You

Winter 2018 Nonprofit Fundraising Study (NFS)

Measuring Constituent Engagement to Drive Nonprofit Success

Demographic Profile of the Officer, Enlisted, and Warrant Officer Populations of the National Guard September 2008 Snapshot

Insights Into The Kansas City Nonprofit Sector

Valley Metro TDM Survey Results Spring for

Crowdfundamentals: What Your Nonprofit Needs to Know about Today s Crowdfunding

INDIVIDUAL GIVING SURVEY (IGS) 2016

Meeting the Technical Assistance and Training Needs of Iowa Nonprofits

Alternative Asset Class Predictions: Asia Region

U.S. Naval Academy Alumni Association and Foundation Draft Enterprise Strategic Plan FY ( )

Canadian Online Retail Trends

The adult social care sector and workforce in. North East

Offshoring of Audit Work in Australia

Patient Payment Check-Up

Community Consultation Survey. Presented to: Board of Directors

Individual Giving Survey 2014

Nonprofit FINANCE. Nonprofits are changing the way they do business. Innovating and Adapting to a New Financial Reality. Page 44. Page 45.

GEM UK: Northern Ireland Report 2011

St. Mary Magdalene Catholic Church FUNDRAISING POLICY

The Ford Foundation EQUIVALENCY AFFIDAVIT PACKET FOR NON-U.S. GRANT APPLICANTS

JOIN THE RACE 5 PROVEN SUCCESS STRATEGIES OF THE TOP RUN WALK RIDE EVENTS

2014 Edition FUNDRAISING WITH ARTEZ INTERACTIVE WHITE PAPER FACEBOOK ARTEZ.COM FACEBOOK.COM/ARTEZINTERACTIVE

The adult social care sector and workforce in. Yorkshire and The Humber

State of the sector report Voluntary Community Charity

Talking About Charities 2006 Report

Digital Disruption meets Indian Healthcare-the role of IT in the transformation of the Indian healthcare system

UK Schools Philanthropic Giving Report Findings from the latest CASE UK Schools Survey of Philanthropic Giving

What Canadian Donors Want

Fundraising. Online. for your website

RE: Proposed Rule on Eligibility Requirements for Standard Mail, Federal Register, April 19, 2004

The NMC register 31 MARCH 2018

Meet the Speakers. James Citron CEO

Fundraising. Online. for your website

Manage Resources to Deliver Optimal Care

2013 Lien Conference on Public Administration Singapore

Weathering the Storm: Challenges and Opportunities Facing Colorado Nonprofits During Recession 2009 Update

JPMorgan Chase Giving Tuesday Program Rules

WHAT PEOPLE WANT ACCENTURE PUBLIC SERVICE CITIZEN SURVEY NONPROFITS

STANFORD SURVEY ON LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT IN THE NONPROFIT SECTOR

North Carolina State University Alumni and Donor Research

The Big Payback Strategy Checklist

The Network for Good Online Giving Index. Update: Q1 & Q2 2011

THE 2014 BLACKBAUD PEER-TO-PEER FUNDRAISING STUDY Amp Up Your Peer-to-Peer Fundraising

BLOOMINGTON NONPROFITS: SCOPE AND DIMENSIONS

Crowdfunding at Cleveland Clinic: Guide and Application

[ ] part of my responsibility is to be an ambassador for giving Report on Philanthropy Development Outcomes

Orientation Guide. Standard Member WELCOME TO EVERYDAYHERO WE RE SO EXCITED TO HAVE YOU ON BOARD

RBS Enterprise Tracker, in association with the Centre for Entrepreneurs

RNL Crowdfunding Index 2017

Raiser s Edge: How To Query Constituent Giving With A Cumulative Total Including Soft Credits

Topline: Nonprofit Media Organizations

Health and Health Care in the 21st Century WAVE 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Common Errors on the T3010 related to fundraising costs. Know how to avoid them

MAJOR GIFT FUNDRAISING:

The size and structure

Sustainers in Focus: The Real Value of Monthly Giving Programs. Chuck Longfield, Chief Scientist, Blackbaud May 1, 2017

NONPROFIT PULSE: A LEADERSHIP SURVEY FROM MARKS PANETH

Transcription:

Donor Perspectives: AN INVESTIGATION INTO WHAT DRIVES YOUR DONORS TO GIVE November 2012 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E solutions@blackbaud.com W www.blackbaud.com

Blackbaud launched the Donor Perspectives survey in order to get a view of the nonprofit sector from the donor perspective and, when relevant, compare findings to the results from Blackbaud s recently-released 2012 State of the Nonprofit Industry survey, which gauged levels of nonprofit optimism and explored successful management strategies. This report provides a snapshot of donor decision-making by looking at how much donors gave in the past year and how that changed from the previous year, as well as donor motivations, preferences, and behaviors. SURVEY METHODOLOGY Blackbaud engaged an international market research panel to reach charitable donors in the United States, United Kingdom and Australia. The survey was open for a two week period in July and August 2012. More than 4,000 donors responded to the survey 1,321 donors from the US, 1,436 donors from the UK, and 1,576 donors from Australia representing a wide range of ages, income levels, and education levels. The results of this study have a +/-3 margin of error at a 95% confidence level. OVERVIEW THE DONOR LANDSCAPE: Giving and How It s Changed DONOR BEHAVIOR: Motivations, Preferences, and Use of Mobile Technology Donors reported moderate increases in their individual donations to charity in the past year. - The net percentage of donors increasing contributions was highest in Australia at 11.5%, followed by the US at 7.8% and the UK at 5.2%. There were some differences by country in drivers for increased charitable contributions. - US respondents tended to be more directly motivated by a change in their financial situation. - UK and Australian respondents were more likely to be driven by an innate desire to help. In all three countries, the respondent s current fiscal situation was the main reason reported for decreased contributions. Over 80% of respondents from each country reported making one-off donations to at least one charity in the past year. - US respondents were most likely to make their last oneoff donation because of a personal circumstance, while UK respondents were most likely to make their last one-off donation through sponsoring a friend or colleague in an event. About two-thirds of respondents from each country reported making regular donations to charity in the past year. - Australian and US respondents were most likely to become regular donors to organizations to which they currently make one-off donations if their personal financial situation improved, while UK respondents were most likely to report that nothing would compel them to become a regular donor to organizations to which they currently make one-off donations. November 2012 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E solutions@blackbaud.com W www.blackbaud.com 1

On average, as the number of charities to which donors made regular donations increased, so did the total amount of financial contributions in all three countries. There were several significant differences between countries and age groups with regard to the methods donors preferred to use making donations. - US donors were most likely to prefer to donate via check and preferred donating by check significantly more than either UK or Australian respondents. - UK and Australian respondents were most likely to prefer to donate via cash. - UK respondents were more than twice as likely as Australian respondents and more than four times as likely as US respondents to prefer to donate via direct debit from a bank checking account. - Australian respondents were twice as likely as UK respondents to prefer to donate via credit/debit card. On average, respondents from the US and UK who prefer to donate via check reported donating more in the last 12 months than those who prefer other methods of donations, while respondents from Australia who preferred to donate via credit/debit card or direct debit reported giving more than those who prefer other methods. US respondents were more likely to report using their mobile phone to read emails, view websites, and make charitable donations through an organization's website than either UK or Australian respondents. The likelihood of using a mobile device to view websites, read emails, send SMS/text donations, or make charitable contributions through an organization s website significantly decreased with age in all three countries. November 2012 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E solutions@blackbaud.com W www.blackbaud.com 2

RESULTS THE DONOR LANDSCAPE Charitable Donations over the Past Year The study results indicate that individual donations to charity slightly increased in the US, UK, and Australia in the past year. Approximately a one-quarter of donors from each country reported that the amount they donated to charity increased from the previous year, while less than 20% reported the amount they donated decreased. On average, US respondents reported donating nearly three times as much to charity as UK or Australian donors. Drivers for Change in Individual Giving Many donors who decreased their individual contributions from the previous year reported that the decrease was due to their current financial situation or the state of the economy. The top reasons reported for increases in financial contributions from the previous year differed by country. US respondents decisions to increase charitable contributions were most often impacted by a change in their personal financial situation. UK and Australian donors cited an innate desire to help as the driving factor behind the increased donations. The average gross annual financial contribution increased as income level increased for donors in all three countries; however, this relationship was stronger for US donors than for UK or Australian donors, reinforcing that US donors decisions regarding how much to donate to charity are more directly impacted by their financial situation than in the other two countries. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% How Individual Donations to Charity Changed from the Previous Year 27.4% 56.7% 22.4% 60.4% 27.6% 52.5% INCREASED NO CHANGE I recently became more involved in volunteer and charity work and thus became more aware of the costs involved in their work. I wanted to help out more. Australian donor, 26, female I just thought I should start giving something back to those who need it and I realised a bit of small change can make a difference. UK donor, 18, male 35% 20% 10% 0% 15.9% 17.2% 19.8% DECREASED I try to give according to percentage of income and my income increased. US donor, 32, female November 2012 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E solutions@blackbaud.com W www.blackbaud.com 3

Donations by Age Average total donations not only varied by country, they also varied with age. In all three countries, the average amount donated to charity annually increased with age. On average, US donors over the age of 65 gave more than three times the amount donated by those ages 18-24 and nearly twice as much as donors ages 25-34. On average, UK donors ages 55-64 donated twice as much to charity than those ages 35-44 and four times as much as those ages 18-24. On average, Australian donors over the age of 65 gave more than twice as much as donors ages 35-44 and more than three times as much as those ages 18-24. DONOR BEHAVIOR To better understand donors, we asked them how frequently and why they make one-time or regular donations, what factors compel them to become regular donors, and how they use mobile technology. The study asked about two styles of giving: 1. One-off donations, which are not scheduled to repeat 2. Regular donations, which are typically scheduled as direct debit, recurring gifts One-off gifts One-off gifts, or single, non-repeating donations, are very prevalent in all countries; approximately 85% of respondents from each country Average Total Donations by Age Group $1,600 Average Total Donations Made in Last 12 Months in US $ $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $463 $154 $800 $470 $333 $1,390 $297 $245 $1,396 $388 $367 $1,288 $671 $511 $1,403 $566 $373 $0 $150 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ November 2012 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E solutions@blackbaud.com W www.blackbaud.com 4

reportedly made one-off donations to at least one organization the past year. In addition, more than half of donors from each country reported making one-off donations to more than one charity in the past year. For US respondents, as the number of charities to which respondents made one-time donations increased, the average amount of financial contributions made in the last year also increased. This trend was not present for UK and Australian respondents, however; in those countries, the average total donations over the past 12 months were static as the number of charities donors made one-off donations to increased. The exception was respondents who made one-off donations to five or more charities, as demonstrated in the chart Motivations for One-off Gifts When asked what drove them to make their most recent one-off donation, US respondents were most likely to report that they were motivated by a personal circumstance with either themselves or a loved one having been affected by the cause the organization supported (21%), followed by sponsoring a friend or colleague participating in an event (16%). UK donors were most likely to have made their last one-off donation by sponsoring a friend or colleague participating in an event (34%) and were significantly more likely than US or Australian donors to report making their last one-off donation for this reason. below. Average Total Donations by Number of Charities to Which One-off Donations Were Made $2,500 Average Total Donations Made in Last 12 Months in US $ $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 $1,029 $295 $283 $684 $333 $226 $963 $451 $365 $1,463 $501 $366 $1,570 $312 $237 $2,207 $792 $583 0 1 2 3 4 5 + Number of Charities to Which One-off Donations Were Made November 2012 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E solutions@blackbaud.com W www.blackbaud.com 5

Average Total Donations by Number of Charities to Which Regular Donations Were Made $3,000 Average Total Donations Made in Last 12 Months in US $ $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 $573 $153 $131 $1,091 $391 $278 $1,343 $487 $377 $1,797 $851 $707 $1,481 $713 $632 $2,716 $1,953 $1,368 0 1 2 3 4 5 + Number of Charities to Which Regular Donations Were Made Many Australian donors also reported being motivated by a personal circumstance (22%) or made their last one-off donation by sponsoring a friend or colleague participating in an event (19%). An additional 8% said they gave their last one-off donation in response to a street or door-to-door solicitation, which was not mentioned as frequently in the US or UK. Regular Gifts Nearly two-thirds of respondents in each country reported making regular donations, which are typically scheduled as recurring direct debit gifts, to charity in the past year. Of those, approximately 40% made regular donations to just one organization and another 30% regularly contributed to two organizations. In all three countries, as the number of charities to which donors made regular donations increased, so did the average total donations made to charity over the past year. In addition, UK and Australian respondents reported donating more in the past 12 months when they made regular donations to one or more organizations than those who made one-off donations. In all three countries, the average total donations drastically increased once a donor reported giving regularly to five or more organizations. Motivations for Regular Gifts When asked what would motivate them to become regular donors to organizations to which they currently made one-off donations, donors from all three countries reported the top three factors that would November 2012 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E solutions@blackbaud.com W www.blackbaud.com 6

impact their decision were: 1. An improvement in their personal financial situation 2. Having passion about an organization s mission 3. Access to information that proved the impact of their contributions 32% of UK donors, 28% of Australian donors, and 19% of US donors reported that nothing would compel them to become a regular donor to charities to which they currently make one-off donations, however, showing that a portion of each population may be reluctant to give in this way. On the flip side, of those that did make recurring donations, between 20% and 30% from each country reported they had stopped making regular donations to an organization in the past three years. More than 40% of donors from all three countries said the main reason was that their personal financial situation required a reduction in charitable giving. The second most reported reason for stopping regular donations was a feeling that the charity was not making the best use of its financial resources. When taken together, the results indicate that while personal finances greatly contribute to donor decisions about regular donations, charities can do more to keep these important donations. By tracking the impact of contributions and By tracking the impact of contributions and communicating that impact back to donors, nonprofits can increase the number of regular donors and ensure they are not losing the regular donors they have. communicating that impact back to donors, nonprofits can increase the number of regular donors and ensure they are not losing the regular donors they have. What would compel you to become a regular donor to an organization to which you currently make one-off donations?...more information on what the donation is actually achieving or contributing to. Australian donor, 46, female Donors Who Stopped Regular Donations to a Charity, by 20.1% Country 100% 90% 27.9% 80% 28.9% 20.1%...If I could see that my money is making a real difference. UK donor, 19, male 28.9% 20.1% 27.9%...Education concerning the company's goals, effectiveness, and financial integrity. US donor, 18, male 28.9% November 2012 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E solutions@blackbaud.com W www.blackbaud.com 7 70% 60% 50% 40% 1 3 4

Donation Preferences for Method of Payment The preferred method of payment also varied country to country and with age. US donors were most likely to prefer to donate via check, preferring this method significantly more than either UK or Australian donors. UK and Australian respondents were most likely to prefer to donate via cash. UK respondents were more than twice as likely as Australian respondents and more than four times as likely as US respondents to prefer to donate via direct debit from checking. Australian donors were twice as likely as UK donors to prefer to donate via credit/debit card. The findings about donor preferences are especially interesting when compared to how nonprofits prefer to receive donations. Blackbaud s 2012 State of the Nonprofit Industry report showed that only 1% of Australian and 7% of UK nonprofits preferred to receive cash donations despite this being the most preferred method of donation for donors. Organizations in the UK reported they prefer to receive donations via direct debit (47%) followed by check (27%). In Australia, nonprofits reported they prefer credit/debit card donations (44%) followed closely by direct debit (42%). The vast majority of US nonprofits reportedly preferred check donations (70%) which is more in sync with donor preferences in that country. Donation Preferences by Age Donation preferences become more nuanced when we look at the role age plays. Specifically: The preference to donate via cash significantly decreased with age for donors from all countries. For US and Australian donors, the preference to donate via direct debit slightly decreased with age while for UK donors it Preferred Method of Donation by Country 50% % of Respondents who Prefer Method 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 42.1% 40.0% 18.4% 33.2% 16.8% 23.0% 10.2% 25.8% 5.9% 6.9% 8.1% 43.1% 4.3% 4.8% 7.6% 3.1% 3.0% 2.0% 0.2% 1.5% 0% Cash Credit/Debit Direct Debit Check In-kind Other Text November 2012 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E solutions@blackbaud.com W www.blackbaud.com 8

Average Total Annual Donations Segmented by Preferred Donation Method $1,600 Average Total Donations In Last 12 Months in US $ $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 Check Direct Debit Credit/Debit Card Cash In-kind Text/SMS *Please note, these amounts do not reflect the total amount donated via each method, but rather the average amount donors who preferred to donate via each method gave in the last 12 months. significantly increased with age. For US and UK donors, the preference to donate via credit/ debit card increased with age, but for Australian donors this preference decreased with age. The preference to donate via check slightly increased with age for Australian and UK donors, but dramatically increased with age for US donors. In all three countries, there was a relationship between donation preferences and the average annual contributions donors made to charities over the past year. On average, respondents from the US and UK who preferred to donate via check reported donating more than those who preferred other donation methods. On average, Australian respondents who preferred credit/debit card or direct debit reported donating more than those who preferred other methods. Again, looking at these results through the lens of the 2012 State of the Nonprofit Industry report brings to light some interesting conclusions. While most UK charities (47%) preferred to receive donations via direct debit, UK donors who preferred to give via check donated, on average, more than twice as much as those who preferred to donate via direct debit. This trend is likely influenced by the finding that older donors tend to donate more and are more Nonprofits should keep donor preferences in mind and ensure donors are able to contribute in various ways or they may miss out on significant contributions likely to prefer to donate via check. This gap between donors and nonprofits however, leads one to conclude that nonprofits should keep donor preferences in mind and ensure donors are able to contribute in various ways, or they may miss out on significant contributions. November 2012 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E solutions@blackbaud.com W www.blackbaud.com 9

Donor Use of Mobile Technologies The study also explored how mobile technology is changing the way donors interact with nonprofit organizations. In each country, approximately half of donors reported they use their mobile phone to read emails and view websites yet less than one-quarter of donors in each country reported using their mobile device to send SMS/text donations and even fewer reported making charitable contributions through an organization s website via their mobile. There were slight cultural differences in the proportions of donors using mobile technology to interact with charities. A slightly higher proportion of US donors reported using their mobile phone to read emails, view websites and make charitable donations than UK or Australian donors. Interestingly, according to research recently released by Google, smart phone penetration is actually higher in Australia (52%) and the UK (50%) than in the US (44%). Comparing the results of the 2012 State of the Nonprofit Industry study and Donor Perspectives survey also suggests that donors have embraced mobile technologies faster than nonprofits. According to the State of the Nonprofit Industry results, approximately 30% of nonprofits in the US, UK, and Australia have already enabled their website for mobile browsing while around 50% of donors in each country reported using their mobile phones to view websites. Similarly, only 20% of UK nonprofits, 26% of Australian nonprofits, and 29% of US nonprofits have already optimized emails for mobile viewing while around half of donors in each country reported viewing emails on their mobile device. The projected growth of the use of mobile technologies in marketing efforts, however, indicates that nonprofits have recognized the need to embrace mobile strategies and have planned to do so in the next year. Finally, mobile behaviors are significantly influenced by the age of the donor. In all three countries, the younger the respondent, the more likely they were to use mobile devices to read emails, view websites, make SMS/text donations, and make charitable contributions. OVER 70% of donors ages 18-24 reported using their mobile device to read emails and view websites, while LESS THAN 40% of those over the age of 55 reported doing so. In Australia, the proportion of donors who reported making a donation through an organization s website on their mobile device DECREASED FROM 18% for donors under the age of 35 to 4% for donors 55 and older. In the UK, the proportion of donors who reported using mobile devices to view websites DECREASED FROM 75% for those under the age of 35 to 57% for those age 35-44 to 40% for those age 45-54 In the US, the proportion of donors who reported using their mobile device to make a SMS/text donation DECREASED FROM 40% for those under the age of 35 to 14% for those 35 and older. November 2012 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E solutions@blackbaud.com W www.blackbaud.com 10

CONCLUSION Making it easier for donors to learn about your organization, answering their questions, and providing clear vehicles for contributions is essential to successful fundraising. In this report, Donor Perspectives attempts to make connections between how nonprofits conduct outreach against donor motivations. Interestingly, the report found that nonprofits were not always meeting constituents' needs through optimized communication or giving channels. Overall, the respondents reported giving more to charities in the past year than in the previous year. US contributors gave the most overall while older donors gave the greatest amount across all countries. Motivations to give were similar for UK and Australian donors, who expressed their innate desire to help, but US donors were primarily influenced by their financial situation. The results of this study clearly indicate that age and culture play a major role in how donors interact with nonprofits. As such, mobile technologies have become increasingly important for younger donors. By facilitating this project, Blackbaud seeks to shed light on what drives donor behavior. In assisting nonprofits to maximize their strategies, nonprofits can increase gifts, reach new audiences and retain current donors. About Blackbaud Serving the nonprofit and education sectors for 30 years, Blackbaud (NASDAQ: BLKB) combines technology and expertise to help organizations achieve their missions. Blackbaud works with more than 27,000 customers in more than 60 countries that support higher education, healthcare, human services, arts and culture, faith, the environment, independent education, animal welfare, and other charitable causes. The company offers a full spectrum of cloud-based and on-premise software solutions, and related services for organizations of all sizes including: fundraising, emarketing, social media, advocacy, constituent relationship management (CRM), analytics, financial management, and vertical-specific solutions. Using Blackbaud technology, these organizations raise more than $100 billion each year. Recognized as a top company by Forbes, InformationWeek, and Software Magazine and honored by Best Places to Work, Blackbaud is headquartered in Charleston, South Carolina and has employees throughout the US, and in Australia, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. November 2012, Blackbaud, Inc. This white paper is for informational purposes only. Blackbaud makes no warranties, expressed or implied, in this summary. The information contained in this document represents the current view of Blackbaud, Inc., on the items discussed as of the date of this publication. All Blackbaud product names appearing herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Blackbaud, Inc. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. November 2012 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E solutions@blackbaud.com W www.blackbaud.com 11