Simulering av industriella processer och logistiksystem MION40, HT Simulation Project. Improving Operations at County Hospital

Similar documents
QUEUING THEORY APPLIED IN HEALTHCARE

University of Michigan Health System

University of Michigan Health System. Final Report

APPLICATION OF SIMULATION MODELING FOR STREAMLINING OPERATIONS IN HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS

ESSAYS ON EFFICIENCY IN SERVICE OPERATIONS: APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH CARE

Identifying step-down bed needs to improve ICU capacity and costs

University of Michigan Health System. Current State Analysis of the Main Adult Emergency Department

Improving Patient s Satisfaction at Urgent Care Clinics by Using Simulation-based Risk Analysis and Quality Improvement

Neurosurgery Clinic Analysis: Increasing Patient Throughput and Enhancing Patient Experience

Designing an appointment system for an outpatient department

ORTHODONTIST. Scheduling Coordinator Manual

Improving Mass Vaccination Clinic Operations

Emergency Services. Time Study

STUDY OF PATIENT WAITING TIME AT EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT OF A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN INDIA

How to deal with Emergency at the Operating Room

A SIMULATION MODEL FOR BIOTERRORISM PREPAREDNESS IN AN EMERGENCY ROOM. Lisa Patvivatsiri

The University of Michigan Health System. Geriatrics Clinic Flow Analysis Final Report

Reducing Waiting-time of Preterm Babies at a Retinopathy of Prematurity Clinic: A Quality Improvement Project

HAEP: Hospital Assignment for Emergency Patients in a Big City

University of Michigan Health System Program and Operations Analysis. Analysis of Pre-Operation Process for UMHS Surgical Oncology Patients

Applying Critical ED Improvement Principles Jody Crane, MD, MBA Kevin Nolan, MStat, MA

Applied Simulation Model for Design of Improving Medical Record Area in Out-Patient Department (OPD) of a Governmental Hospital

Make the most of your resources with our simulation-based decision tools

University of Michigan Health System. Program and Operations Analysis. CSR Staffing Process. Final Report

RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

LEAN Transformation Storyboard 2015 to present

Application of Value Engineering to Improve Discharging Procedure in Healthcare Centers (Case Study: Amini Hospital, Langroud, Iran)

Optimizing the planning of the one day treatment facility of the VUmc

University of Michigan Health System Analysis of Wait Times Through the Patient Preoperative Process. Final Report

Using Queuing Theory and Simulation Modelling to Reduce Waiting Times in An Iranian Emergency Department

NEW INNOVATIONS TO IMPROVE PATIENT FLOW IN THE ED AND HOSPITAL OCTOBER 12, Mike Williams, MPH/HSA The Abaris Group

Analyzing Physician Task Allocation and Patient Flow at the Radiation Oncology Clinic. Final Report

REDESIGNING THE MEDICATION ORDERING, DISPENSING, AND ADMINISTRATION PROCESS IN AN ACUTE CARE ACADEMIC HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE

Questions and answers about Recycling Processes

Rationalising Shared Care: The Case of the Referral

Using discrete event simulation to improve the patient care process in the emergency department of a rural Kentucky hospital.

Title Page. Title: Simulating a Mass Vaccination Clinic Running Title: Simulating a Mass Vaccination Clinic

Grand River Hospital and St Mary s General Hospital Increases Throughput, Cuts Costs using Lean

Quality Management Building Blocks

Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility

Appendix VI: Developing and Writing Grant Proposals

A Step-by-Step Guide to Tackling your Challenges

Improving Patient Throughput in the Emergency Department

Blake 13. Lori Pugsley RN MEd Massachusetts General Hospital March 6, 2012

Structured Practical Experiential Program

uncovering key data points to improve OR profitability

Transfer of Patients between Hospitals

Emergency Department Throughput

SCHEDULING COORDINATOR MANUAL GENERAL DENTIST. Scheduling Coordinator Manual

Continuous Quality Improvement Made Possible

WarmWise Business Custom Rebates Program Manual

Improving Mott Hospital Post-Operative Processes

Guided Study Program in System Dynamics System Dynamics in Education Project System Dynamics Group MIT Sloan School of Management 1

Pediatric Hematology / Oncology Clinic

University of Michigan Health System. Inpatient Cardiology Unit Analysis: Collect, Categorize and Quantify Delays for Procedures Final Report

Banner Finance Research Accounting Training Workbook

Online library of Quality, Service Improvement and Redesign tools. Discharge planning. collaboration trust respect innovation courage compassion

Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference W. K. V. Chan, A. D'Ambrogio, G. Zacharewicz, N. Mustafee, G. Wainer, and E. Page, eds.

HOW TO WRITE AN EFFECTIVE AFV SCHOOL BUS PROPOSAL SUBMITTED UNDER THE STATE ENERGY PROGRAM FY 2003 SPECIAL PROJECTS SOLICITATION

Let s Talk Informatics

IMPROVEMENT OF PATIENT PATHWAY IN A BREAST CANCER CENTER. Department of Management Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, TURKEY

Final Report. Karen Keast Director of Clinical Operations. Jacquelynn Lapinski Senior Management Engineer

Hospital Patient Flow Capacity Planning Simulation Model at Vancouver Coastal Health

Models and Insights for Hospital Inpatient Operations: Time-of-Day Congestion for ED Patients Awaiting Beds *

Eleganza 3XC. Designed for ICU

Check-Plan-Do-Check-Act-Cycle

Lincolnshire CCGs. Non-Emergency Patient Transport. Eligibility Criteria Policy

Dynamic optimization of chemotherapy outpatient scheduling with uncertainty

An Analysis of Waiting Time Reduction in a Private Hospital in the Middle East

Manuscripts Processed. DATE: April 16, PAA Committee on Publications and Board of Directors. FROM: Pamela Smock, Editor

An analysis of the average waiting time during the patient discharge process at Kashani Hospital in Esfahan, Iran: a case study

Department of Radiation Oncology

USING SIMULATION MODELS FOR SURGICAL CARE PROCESS REENGINEERING IN HOSPITALS

Homework No. 2: Capacity Analysis. Little s Law.

A QUEUING-BASE STATISTICAL APPROXIMATION OF HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT BOARDING

Project Number: SAJ SV01. Improving Patient Chart Flow at St. Vincent Hospital

Hospital Patient Flow Capacity Planning Simulation Models

Analysis of Nursing Workload in Primary Care

Using Computer Simulation to Study Hospital Admission and Discharge Processes

THE USE OF SIMULATION TO DETERMINE MAXIMUM CAPACITY IN THE SURGICAL SUITE OPERATING ROOM. Sarah M. Ballard Michael E. Kuhl

Impact of Scribes on Performance Indicators in the Emergency Department

2014 Fire Pit Competition

Sample. A guide to development of a hospital blood transfusion Policy at the hospital level. Effective from April Hospital Transfusion Committee

Licentiate programme grant for teachers and preschool

Public Health Needs: Quality of Care and Sustainability an International Overview. Dr. David Jaimovich President

Primary care streaming: Roll out to September

Olof Palme s Visiting Professorship

Begin Implementation. Train Your Team and Take Action

GENERAL DENTIST. Dental Receptionist Manual

Delivering surgical services: options for maximising resources

PEDIATRIC DENTIST. Dental Receptionist Manual

Soarian Clinicals View Only

Inpatient Flow Real Time Demand Capacity: Building the System

Lean Six Sigma in Healthcare. 4 Simple BFO s s that Change Everything

Supply chain in healthcare

An online short-term bed occupancy rate prediction procedure based on discrete event simulation

Inteligencia Artificial. Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial ISSN:

Building a Smarter Healthcare System The IE s Role. Kristin H. Goin Service Consultant Children s Healthcare of Atlanta

Your Concerns. Communication Skills PART OF THE FIRST 33 HOURS PROGRAMME FOR NEW VOLUNTEERS AT CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL.

GCP INSPECTION CHECKLIST

Transcription:

Simulering av industriella processer och logistiksystem MION40, HT 2012 Simulation Project Improving Operations at County Hospital County Hospital wishes to improve the service level of its regular X-ray operation which runs from 8 am to 8 pm. Patients have identified the total required time as the major service issue in this process. Management, on the other hand, is concerned with utilization of available resources. A process design team has been formed to study this problem. The process might be redesigned as a result of the team s recommendations. The team has defined the entry point to the X-ray process to be the instant a patient leaves the physician s office en-route to the X-ray lab. The exit point has been defined as the instant at which the patient and the completed X-ray enter the physician s office. There are broadly speaking two types of patients arriving to the X-ray process - emergency and non-emergency patients (priority level 1 and 2 respectively). The emergency patients arrive according to a Poisson process with a mean of 4 patients per hour. The non-emergency patients are registered as they enter and a sample of the arrival time data is provided in the Appendix. So far, no attempt has been made to further analyze this data, and there is no insight into what the arrival process looks like. The team has identified 12 activities in the current X-ray process (see Table 1), which is the same irrespective of the patient type. The only differences between patient categories are the activity times and their distributions, specified in Table 3. It should be noted that: The patient priority levels determine the service order at all the X-ray activities. Emergency patients (priority 1) come first at the expense of non-emergency patients (priority 2). However, ongoing service will never be interrupted at the benefit of high priority patients. 1

Table 1. Activities in the X-ray process Activity Description Type 1 Patient leaves physician s office with instructions. Start of the X-ray process 2 Patient is taken to the lab by an orderly on foot, in a Transportation wheel chair or lying in a bed. 3 The patient is left in the waiting area outside the X- Waiting ray lab in anticipation of an X-ray technician. 4 An X-ray technician fills out a standard form based on information supplied by the physician and the patient (done outside the X-ray lab). The technician then leaves the patient, which queues up in front of the X-ray labs. 5 The patient enters the X-ray lab, undresses and an X- ray technician takes the required X-rays (all done in the X-ray lab). 6 A dark room technician develops the X-rays. (Assume that the patient and the X-ray technician accompanies the X-rays) 7 The dark room technician and the X-ray technician check the X-rays for clarity. (Assume that the patient accompanies his/her X-rays) 8 If the X-rays are not clear, the patient needs to go back to the waiting room in anticipation of repeating steps 5, 6 and 7. Historically, the probability of rejecting X-rays has been 25%. If the X-rays are acceptable the patient proceeds to activity 9 while the X-rays are put in the outbox, where eventually the messenger service will pick them up. Business value added Value added Value added Inspection Decision 9 Patient waits for an orderly to take him/her back to Waiting the physician s office 10 Patient is taken back to the physician s office by an Transportation orderly. 11 A messenger service transfers the X-rays to the Transportation physician s office in batches of five jobs. 12 Patient and X-rays enter physician s office together. End 2

The resource data for the X-ray process are specified in Table 2 below. Table 2. Resource data for X-ray process Resource Activities No. of units available Orderlies 2 and 10 3 X-ray technician 4, 5, 6 and 7 3 X-ray lab 5 2 Dark room technician 6 and 7 2 Dark room 6 1 The orderlies will always try to take a patient back from the X-ray when they have dropped one off. Assume that the transportation time back from the X-ray lab is exactly the same as the transportation time to the X-ray lab. If no patient is ready to go back the orderly will wait for five minutes, if no patient becomes available during this time the orderly will return to the ward without a patient. The time for an orderly to walk back without a patient is always 5 minutes. The orderlies will never go and pick up a patient at the X-ray area without bringing another patient with them from the ward. Table 3. Activity times Activity Patient type Activity time Parameter values (minutes) distribution 1 All types Not Applicable Not Applicable 2 Emergency patients Non-emergency patients Max=9, Min=5 Max=12, Min=5 3 All types Not Applicable Not Applicable 4 All types Max=6, Min=4 5 Emergency patients Non-emergency patients Normal Normal =9, =4 =11, =4 6 All types Normal =12, =5 7 All types Constant Value=2 8 All types Constant Value=0 9 All types Not Applicable Not Applicable 10 Emergency patients Non-emergency patients Max=9, Min=5 Max=12, Min=5 11 All types Max=7, Min=3 12 All types Not Applicable Not Applicable 3

Assignments Analyzing the current process design Phase I a) Draw a flow chart over the X-ray process. The flowchart should describe the process in detail. A careful documentation and a good understanding of the process will make it easier to build the simulation model in phase 2. The flowchart should be drawn on the computer. The most important objective is to convey an unambiguous and detailed description of the process, using a particular syntax or set of symbols is of less importance. It is recommended not to proceed with the following questions before you are sure that the solution to a) describes the problem correctly. Phase II b) Develop a simulation model of the process. Modeling hint: For batching and un-batching, use the blocks Batch and Unbatch from the Discrete Event Library with the option Preserve uniqueness checked. Modeling hint: Build the model incrementally based on your flowchart, do not try to put everything together at once and then test if it works. The keyword is Baby steps As a first check that everything works as supposed to it is often useful to run a shorter simulation with animation. Use different symbols for different types of items, for example different types of labor and different types of jobs. c) As a first cut analysis, run a 1 day simulation with Random seed=100, using the correct activity time distributions. Look at the average cycle time, the throughput, the resource, the queue and the activity statistics. What seems to be the problems in this process? 4

Phase III d) Analyze the input data regarding non-emergency patients inter-arrival times. Use the statistical tools discussed in class to determine a distribution that adequately describes the data. The analysis should be done without the help of the statfit software available in Extend. e) Simulate 30 days of operation and compute the cycle time and daily throughput (average and standard deviation). Also compute the activity and resource utilization statistics and queue statistics with 95% confidence intervals (use the statistics blocks in Extend). Assume that any patients remaining in the system at the end of the day will be taken care of by the night shift. Every morning the system is considered empty. Are there any surprises compared to the results in c) above? f) Assess the performance of the process using the values calculated in e). Where is the bottleneck? What seems to be the problem in terms of cycle time and throughput? Suggest and evaluate a new process design g) Based on your insights about current operations suggest at least three plausible design changes with the purpose of reducing the average cycle time and increasing the throughput. h) Investigate the performance of the new process design in terms of the cycle times, and the daily throughput. Also, look at the resource, activity utilization and queue statistics with 95% confidence intervals as before. What is your conclusion? Is the new design significantly better than the old process in terms of cycle times and daily throughput (the conclusion must be statistically supported)? Are there any obvious drawbacks? Instructions for the final report Each group should produce a well-written and well-structured typed report (OBS! One report per group!). The report should explain the problem, your approach to solve it, your findings, results and conclusions. The questions a)-h) above obviously need to be treated fully and model printout and data on which you base your conclusions needs to be made available in appendices. The underlying Extend models should be provided in electronic format via e-mail to Fredrik Olsson. The report, excluding the electronic Extend models, shall be submitted in paper format to Fredrik Olsson. Each report must clearly state the name of all the group members. 5

Appendix Arrival data for non-emergency patients Patient # Time of arrival (in minutes from time zero) Patient # Time of arrival (in minutes from time zero) 1 1.49 31 183.77 2 3.01 32 183.80 3 6.29 33 185.46 4 7.76 34 187.54 5 10.87 35 199.79 6 13.54 36 213.09 7 45.13 37 227.22 8 47.03 38 235.60 9 47.97 39 259.43 10 52.02 40 272.97 11 53.81 41 275.60 12 55.07 42 286.18 13 57.25 43 287.90 14 59.56 44 293.97 15 73.87 45 297.86 16 92.60 46 298.56 17 111.60 47 306.59 18 122.03 48 321.28 19 128.93 49 325.51 20 133.67 50 328.73 21 135.82 51 329.21 22 138.01 52 329.50 23 138.53 53 339.11 24 144.39 54 343.71 25 149.49 55 356.54 26 158.34 56 356.68 27 170.66 57 366.32 28 173.11 58 371.05 29 176.59 59 374.01 30 177.85 60 374.86 This material is also available in electronic format on the WEB. 6