Getting The Boundaries Right: The DoD Real Property Inventory Mapping Pilot Project David LaBranche, P.E. DISDI Mission Assurance Officer ODUSD(I&E), Business Enterprise Integration 24 May, 2007
Agenda The DoD Real Property Inventory Initiative Where We Were Disparate RP Databases, No Connection to Geospatial Data Services Real Property Maps not Digital DISDI RPI Mapping Pilot Phase I Evaluated Possible Geospatial Solution Where We Are Today DISDI RPI Mapping Pilot Phase II: Status & Trends Revolutionary Changes Underway in Spatial Data Standards Where We Expect to Be Solid Beginnings of RP Geospatial Databases Emerging Consensus on Data Architecture and Visualization Schemas
The DoD Business Domain Supporting Net-Centric Warfare Data is an essential enabler of network-centric warfare and shall be made visible, accessible, and understandable to any potential user in DoD as early as possible in the life cycle to support mission objectives. DOD Directive 8320.2 December 2, 2004. The DoD Business Domain has 5 Core Business Mission Areas: The RP&ILM CBM will provide the Warfighter and other Core Business Missions with continuous access to I&E information.
What is the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI)? A DoD mission capability comprised of those people, policies, and practices necessary to acquire, steward, and share installation, environmental, and range geospatial data assets for defense, federal, and national goals
Governance of I&E Geospatial Information and Services Real Property & Real Property & Installation Lifecycle Management Installation Lifecycle Management Domain Governance Board Domain Governance Board (RP&ILM DGB) (RP&ILM DGB) Principals: DUSD (I&E) Asst Sec of the Army (I&E) Asst Sec of the Navy (I&E) Dep Asst Sec of the Air Force (Installations) Asst Chief of Staff for Installation Mgt, US Army Air Force Civil Engineer Navy Chief of Naval Operations (N-46) Asst Dep Comdt. (I&L)(F), US Marine Corps Dir, Real Estate and Facilities, WHS DISDI DISDI Group Group (DISDI-G) (DISDI-G) Real Property & Real Property & Installation Lifecycle Management Installation Lifecycle Management Investment Review Board Investment Review Board (RP&ILM IRB) (RP&ILM IRB) Principals: DUSD (I&E) Asst Sec of the Army (I&E) Asst Sec of the Navy (I&E) Asst Sec of the Air Force (IE&L) Joint Staff, J-4 Asst Sec of Def (NII/DoD CIO) Director, PA&E WORKING GROUPS SDSFIE METADATA IMAGERY support ODUSD(I&E) BEI-DISDI ODUSD(I&E) BEI-DISDI Defense Installation Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure Spatial Data Infrastructure Director, Director, RE & Fac., RE & Fac., WHS WHS Headquarters, Headquarters, US Army Corps US Army Corps of Engineers of Engineers ACSIM, US Army ACSIM, US Army (Army IGI&S) (Army IGI&S) HQNAVFAC, HQNAVFAC, US Navy US Navy (GeoReadiness) (GeoReadiness) Asst Dep Comdt, Asst Dep Comdt, (I&L)(F), US (I&L)(F), US Marine Corps Marine Corps (GeoFidelis) (GeoFidelis) Air Force Civil Air Force Civil Engineer Engineer (GeoBase) (GeoBase) DISDI Functional Components MSC Enterprise GIS (EGIS) Group CIO GIS Configuration Integration Board (CIB) GeoReadiness Integration Team GEOFidelis Advisory Council Installation Mapping & Visualization Council Business Mission Area Functional Inputs
DISDI Support for DoD Real Property Inventory (RPI) Goal: Formal registry of accurate real property data, including site locations (depicted in a standard, geospatial data format) Site Registry - Authoritative, non-spatial repository of all DoD sites Mapping Site locations (legal boundaries) is a key component of the RPI Based on land descriptions from acquisition deeds, lease agreements, SOFA agreements, etc. Entered via digitized Tract Maps or Coordinate Geometry (COGO) using legal (parcel) land descriptions Two Phases of Pilot Prototyping; 75+ installations or sites Relevance to DoD Installations New boundary layer (CIP or MDS) Changes to the SDSFIE
Results of Phase I, RPI Mapping Pilot Goals Accomplished: Established new geo-data model for capturing RPI sites and land parcels DoD-wide Validated geospatial data collection process and synchronization with Real Property Unique Identifier (RPUIR) registry Established per-unit data collection costs Process Mapped parcels using land descriptions from legal deeds Compiled sites in accordance with RPIR rules 18 installations in National Capital Region (NCR) and USACE Seattle District area Data delivered May 06, distributed to Services Jun 06
DoDI 4165.14 RPI Requirements Logical Data Elements and Spatial Data Map Layers RPI Phase I Sites and Land (Parcel) Assets Sites and Land Parcels Dover AFB, DE Site Boundaries Land Parcels (owned) Land Parcels (non-owned)
Map Layers and Spatial Relationships for RPI Land Assets Contribution to Site Boundaries Map Layers (Themes or SDSFIE Entity Types ) Overlap Rules RPI Sites Site polygons may not overlap All owned land parcels contribute to site boundaries RPI Land Parcels (Owned / fee simple) Owned land parcel polygons may not overlap All non-owned lands contribute to site boundaries RPI Land Parcels (Non-Owned / Less-than-fee rights and interests ingranted to DoD) Non-owned land parcels may not overlap with owned land parcels, but may overlap other nonowned lands
Phase II, RPI Parcel Mapping Pilot 57 Installations/Sites will be mapped to support joint basing and the Energy Policy Act, 2005 (those installations where proposed energy corridors cross or are near DoD boundaries) Fully funded by ODUSD(I&E) BEI Leverage lessons learned in RPI Mapping Phase I Will be fully compliant with site and asset registry business rules and coordinated with OSD/Service real property staff Source data for Phase II to be provided by asset registry contractor Digitized Tract Maps, Summary Maps, Deeds, Acquisition Records Installations to be mapped to parcel level (i.e. land asset) RPUIDs will be assigned to parcels; Services will then aggregate parcels into sites thru government review process
Progress and Initial Results Phase II, RPI Parcel Mapping Pilot Imagery Acquired for all 57 Installations/Sites Asset Registry Contractor (Bearing Point) has delivered source documents for all Installations/Sites Contractors evaluating completeness of source document records, alignment with official site names, etc. Contractor discovering differences between paper records and automated real property records Contractors and Component RPO/GIO teams are working closely to clarify apparent record discrepancies, data gaps, etc. 11 Installations/sites have been delivered in draft form for Component RPO/GIO review OSD considering adding additional Installations/Sites based on available funding
MCB Quantico Comparing Boundaries: IVT IVT and and NAVTEQ
Comparing Boundaries: IVT IVT and and RPI RPI Yellow Yellow as-is as-is installation installation boundary boundary (IVT) (IVT) Red Red RPI RPI Site Site Boundary Boundary
Real Property Data Elements and Spatial Data Standards Spatial Data Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure and Environment SDSFIE 2.6 contains some but not all of the RPIR logical data model elements Not in SDSFIE 2.6
Benefits of RPI Geospatial Mapping Automated Reconciliation of Environmental Liabilities DERP Sites vs Parcels Example: Andrews AFB Env. Concern Sites vs Parcels 44 of 253 Parcels have EL (DERP) 137 of 253 Parcels have potential EL
Military Installation & Range Boundaries: The Way Forward SHORT-TERM TERM Official Site Name Lists still lack consistency with legacy site names, reference documents Reported Parcel Acreage Values Currently based on Deeds GIS-derived values typically have greater accuracy Business Rules may be needed Boundary Accuracy Issues Not all survey reference data is created equal RPOs gathering knowledge from pilot project use cases Business Rules may be needed LONG-TERM Component Level Follow-up Activities Recompiling Site Boundaries for higher fidelity Real Property guidance to capture parcel level boundary rules Designate or Develop RPI spatial databases, linked to RPI business databases Multi-year effort; spiral development RPUID will allow linkage to many other mission databases
Final Thoughts Site and Asset Registry Data Spirals Cost and Quality Spiral Inventory Population Effort Estimated OSD Cost or Effort Timing Component Effort Zero Installation Data $0 Complete Maintain One Site Registry Data Costly One Year Data Validation Two Asset Registry Data (Land Parcels) More Costly One to Two Years Data Validation Three Parcel Mapping Very costly if a separate initiative Several Years Leverage Land Parcel Data Population Effort (Spiral Two) Four Survey Mapping (e.g., Ground Truth) Even more costly if a separate initiative Longer Where do we start? At the top or bottom? Geospatial Data Maintenance
Questions? Mr. David LaBranche, P.E. Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Office of the Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Installations & Environment, Business Enterprise Integration Directorate ODUSD(I&E) BEI E-mail: david.labranche.ctr@osd.mil Web site and DISDI Portal: www.acq.osd.mil/ie/bei/disdi.htm