NATO C2 in Libya: Coherence from Diversity. Richard E. Hayes Sabrina Fountas Stacey Kaminski

Similar documents
THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release December 5, 2016

Operation Unified Protector: Targeting Densely Populated Areas in Libya

FORWARD, READY, NOW!

SS.7.C.4.3 Describe examples of how the United States has dealt with international conflicts.

Active Endeavour ATO. NATO naval operations

Lessons From Libya. By John A. Tirpak, Executive Editor

International Conference Smart Defence (Tiranë, 27 April 2012) The concept of Smart Defense (Intelligence) in the context of Kosovo

More Data From Desert

NATO s Diminishing Military Function

Update from the NATO EOD Working Group

Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries ( )

Foreign Policy and Homeland Security

NATO. Canada & The Cold War. Canada and the Creation of NATO. Chapter 8-9 Social Studies

1st Marine Expeditionary Brigade Public Affairs Office United States Marine Corps Camp Pendleton, Calif

Planning and conducting modern military

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

The Libya Mission. The Air Force, technically in a supporting role, has been front and center. By Amy McCullough, Senior Editor

***** 13 February 2018 *****

Advance Notification of forthcoming Market Survey APMS

SACT s remarks to UN ambassadors and military advisors from NATO countries. New York City, 18 Apr 2018

Capability Solutions for Joint, Multinational, and Coalition Operations

The War in Europe and North Africa Ch 24-1

NATO Force Integration Unit LATVIA NATO HQ for NATO s new challenges, providing security for business growth and investments

MEDIA INFORMATION GUIDE

Released under the Official Information Act 1982

Organization of Marine Corps Forces

NATO EUROPEAN STATES PLAYER CELL MILITARY ORDER OF BATTLE INFORMATION

Strategic Landpower in NATO

Balanced tactical helicopter force

ABOUT THE MILITARY COMMITTEE (MC)

Executing our Maritime Strategy

NATO s Special Meeting in Brussels Addressing Current Priorities and Restating Core Values

... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!

Yemen ISR CONOPS and Capabilities

Notification of Intent to Invite International Competitive Bids for the

Ramstein AB, Germany. Major Units 9/4/18. Page 1 of 5. HQ USAFE Civil Engineers Contact Information: DSN: FAX:

UNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified

Notification of Intent to Invite International Competitive Bids

Global Vigilance, Global Reach, Global Power for America

Bell Quiz: Pages

NATO Airborne Early Warning & Control Force

NATO Ammunition Safety Group (AC/326) Overview with a Focus on Subgroup 5's Areas of Responsibilities

Charles Altman. Naval Officer Hat Insignia - Donated by Altman 23 June 2006

Imagery Transmission Technology for Land Mobile, Vehicular, Maritime and AERO Operations

5 June 2018 DOCUMENT C-M(2018)0025 (DNK-OVERVIEW) NATO DEFENCE PLANNING CAPABILITY REVIEW 2017/2018 DENMARK OVERVIEW

Organization of Marine Corps Forces

ALLIED JOINT PUBLICATION FOR OPERATIONS PLANNING (AJP 5) AS NEW CHALLENGES FOR MILITARY PLANNERS

The Transformation of Danish Air Power

NATO Moving to Create New Intelligence Chief Post - WSJ

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

MEMORANDUM. BASE OPS/ International Spy Museum. Operation Minute by Minute. 01 October, 1962 (time travel skills required)

Evaluation of the European Reassurance Initiative (ERI)

UNIT AWARDS JOINT MERITORIOUS UNIT AWARD... VALOROUS UNIT AWARD...

CSDP Civilian Missions. Bert Versmessen, Chief of Staff Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability (CPCC)

Introduction. General Bernard W. Rogers, Follow-On Forces Attack: Myths lnd Realities, NATO Review, No. 6, December 1984, pp. 1-9.

Evolution of UN-NATO Post-Cold War Relations. Evolution of AU-NATO Relations Since 2005

An Analysis of the EU s Military Intervention against Libya

CHAPTER 5 COMMAND AND CONTROL OF SAN MARITIME FORCES CONTENTS. Command and Control Hierarchy in the SANDF 71

This block in the Interactive DA Framework is all about joint concepts. The primary reference document for joint operations concepts (or JOpsC) in

Statement to the United Nations Security Council on the situation in Libya, pursuant to UNSCR 1970 (2011)

AFCEA/GMU Symposium "Critical Issues in C4I"

Defense Technical Information Center Compilation Part Notice

Imagine an aging but still lethal SA-6. Unifying Our Vision. Joint ISR Coordination and the NATO Joint ISR Initiative. By Matthew J.

Spain-US Shared Interests: from Friendship to Partnership

THE MILITARY STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA

D-Day. The invasion of Normandy was the largest land and sea attack ever launched with over troops, over 7000 ships and aircraft.

The 16th Sustainment Brigade Sustains a Strong Europe

Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) first collaborative PESCO projects - Overview

Strong. Secure. Engaged: Canada s New Defence Policy

14 January Date of Access: 24 January

ROBUST NATO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE

CRS Report for Congress

STATEMENT OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL MICHAEL W. WOOLEY, U.S. AIR FORCE COMMANDER AIR FORCE SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND BEFORE THE

Restructuring and Modernization of the Romanian Armed Forces for Euro-Atlantic Integration Capt.assist. Aurelian RAŢIU

NATO MEASURES ON ISSUES RELATING TO THE LINKAGE BETWEEN THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM AND THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

J. L. Jones General, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps

Turkey Doesn t Need Article V NATO Support to Defend Itself Against Syria. by John Noble

Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 Published on Arms Control Association (

Satellite Sentinel Project escalation: evidence of saf and spla combat operations

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Participation in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Infrastructure Program

COUNTER IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (CIED) MULTINATIONAL PROGRAM

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

RESOLUTION MSC.298(87) (adopted on 21 May 2010) ESTABLISHMENT OF A DISTRIBUTION FACILITY FOR THE PROVISION OF LRIT INFORMATION TO SECURITY FORCES

The Top 100 Rules of the New American Way of War

AIR POWER DEFINITIONS AND TERMS

Mission Network as the New Joint, Coalition Norm

International Trade. Virginia Economic Development Partnership. Presented By: Ellen Meinhart

Supporting Syria and the region: Post-Brussels conference financial tracking

Jennifer Jones Cunningham

70th Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Wing History

CHAPTER TH Military Intelligence Group. Introduction

PIRACY AND ARMED ROBBERY AGAINST SHIPS. Guidance for flag States on measures to prevent Somalia-based piracy

Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General

Supporting Syria and the region: Post-Brussels conference financial tracking

2015 Leaders Summit on Peacekeeping Summary of Member-State Commitments United Nations October 2015

Case 1:15-cv CM Document Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 6. Exhibit 11. April 2011 Gates Statement

EUTM Mali Public Affairs Office Internet :

OPCW UN JOINT MISSION IN SYRIA

Aviation Planning The Commander s Role in Planning. Chapter 5

By Captain Joseph J. Caperna, Captain Thomas M. Ryder, and First Lieutenant Jamal Nasir

Transcription:

NATO C2 in Libya: Coherence from Diversity Richard E. Hayes Sabrina Fountas Stacey Kaminski 1

Timeline of Events NATO decisions/events before operation begins Air surveillance increased end of February/beginning of March through Allied Air Command in Turkey Maritime surveillance increased March 10 th using ships in the region under Operation Active Endeavour (NATO response to 9/11) Phase I March 17-23, 2011 US and Coalition: NATO Operation Active Endeavour engaged under Resolution 1970 & 1973 Phase II March 23-31, 2011 Operation Unified Protector (NATO) Takes Over US relinquishes control over operation to NATO US remains an active partner and embedded in NATO command structure Phase III March 31-June 9, 2011 NATO Takes Sole Command of International Air Operations Over Libya Phase IV June 10, 2011-October 2011 NATO Extends Mission Gaddafi captured October 20, 2011; mission ended October 31, 2011 2

Major Cities and Coalition Targets 3

Map of Libyan Military Facilities, Energy Infrastructure and Conflict 4

Operation Unified Protector Command Structure NATO Headquarters North Atlantic Council Brussels, Belgium Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe Mons, Belgium Admiral James G. Stavridis (US) Supreme Allied Commander Europe Allied Joint Force Command Naples, Italy Lieutenant General Charles Bouchard (CA) Deputy Commander Joint Force Command/Operational Commander Allied Air Command Izmir, Turkey Lieutenant General Ralph J. Jodice II (US) Allied Maritime Command Naples, Italy Vice Admiral Rinaldo Veri (IT) 5

6

Operation Unified Protector Command Arrangements Maritime All NATO participating countries provided personnel or resources* Air Most Participating NATO countries provided personnel or resources** US, UK, Canada, France engaged in strike missions Jordan refused to fly combat missions Qatar participated in patrol missions only Land Rebels coordination with NATO February : Reports that SAS forces arrived to assist rebel forces July 15: Transitional National Council (TNC) recognized by US August 20: TNC launches first attack on the capital along with NATO troops On the ground troops March: NYTimes reports CIA, MI6 forces have been on the ground for weeks August: First reports of active ground troops France, Qatar and Jordan special troops reportedly played a role. *Germany withdraws support on March 23, 2011 **Bulgaria and Romania did not provide aircraft or personnel 7

Targeting in a Complex Endeavor Sources for nominating targets Formal Nomination National assets Joint targeting board NATO review Air tasking order Pilot responsibility and discretion Informal Intelligence Agencies Rebel requests Monitoring social media 8

Conclusions US and Coalition forces (and subsequently NATO) actively engaged in implementing the UN Mandates as set forth in Resolutions 1970, and later 1973 Broad diversity of actors NATO command structure and military assets Non NATO militaries Broad inter agency participation NGOs involved in humanitarian roles Rebel diversity: Tribes, cities, local authorities 9

Conclusions Key Factors for Success Physical location close to NATO bases Maritime presence off the coast of Libya Mission was for a finite purpose and time Role of information gathering on the ground by US, Coalition and NATO forces US, Coalition and NATO forces ability to coordinate command and control to provide situational awareness and targeting Rebel courage and persistence, ability to learn Information sharing 10

Backup Slides 11

US Mission to NATO It was the United States that took out the air defense system in Libya in the opening part of this operation and continued to suppress enemy air defenses throughout the conflict as well as provided a critical precision targeting capability by deploying armed Predators. It was the United States that provided the bulk of the intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance information that was critical for the conduct of this operation in all of its aspects, at sea and in the air. It was the United States that provided the critical targeters who were able to translate information into targets. And it was the United States that provided the critical air refueling capability that allowed countries to sustain their combat operations in the air. Sept 8, 2011 http://nato.usmission.ogv/libya-oup-90811.html 12

Libyan Tribes http://hosted.ap.org/interactives/2011/gadha fi/libya-tribes.swf 13

Libyan rebels retake Brega July 18, 2011 http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110718/world/libyan-rebelsretake-brega.376217 14