AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY

Similar documents
Where Have You Gone MTO? Captain Brian M. Bell CG #7 LTC D. Major

Blue on Blue: Tracking Blue Forces Across the MAGTF Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain D.R. Stengrim to: Major Shaw, CG February 2005

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Shallow-Water Mine Countermeasure Capability for USMC Ground Reconnaissance Assets EWS Subject Area Warfighting

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

In 2007, the United States Army Reserve completed its

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

USMC Identity Operations Strategy. Major Frank Sanchez, USMC HQ PP&O

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Report No. D April 9, Training Requirements for U.S. Ground Forces Deploying in Support of Operation Iraqi Freedom

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

The Need for NMCI. N Bukovac CG February 2009

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

The first EHCC to be deployed to Afghanistan in support

The Advantages of Commercial Satellites versus Military Satellites. Captain Thomas J. Heller

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

The Affect of Division-Level Consolidated Administration on Battalion Adjutant Sections

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

New Tactics for a New Enemy By John C. Decker

Improving the Tank Scout. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain R.L. Burton CG #3, FACADs: Majors A.L. Shaw and W.C. Stophel 7 February 2006

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

IMPROVING SPACE TRAINING

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

Maintaining Tank and Infantry Integration Training EWS Subject Area Training

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

COTS Impact to RM&S from an ISEA Perspective

U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

Wildland Fire Assistance

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

The U.S. military has successfully completed hundreds of Relief-in-Place and Transfers of

2010 Fall/Winter 2011 Edition A army Space Journal

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Coalition Operations With the Combined Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System (CENTRIXS) Brad Carter Debora Harlor

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Mission Task Analysis for the NATO Defence Requirements Review

Medical Requirements and Deployments

Lessons learned process ensures future operations build on successes

Streamlining U.S. Army Military Installation Map (MIM) Production

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? Submitted by Capt Mark C. Brown CG #15. Majors Dixon and Duryea EWS 2005

The Landscape of the DoD Civilian Workforce

USMC Expeditionary Energy

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

The Need for a New Battery Option. Subject Area General EWS 2006

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Google Pilot / WEdge Viewer

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

Redefining how Relative Values are determined on Fitness Reports EWS Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain S.R. Walsh to Maj Tatum 19 Feb 08

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

DoD Architecture Registry System (DARS) EA Conference 2012

Tannis Danley, Calibre Systems. 10 May Technology Transition Supporting DoD Readiness, Sustainability, and the Warfighter. DoD Executive Agent

Submitted by Captain RP Lynch To Major SD Griffin, CG February 2006

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Report No. D September 25, Controls Over Information Contained in BlackBerry Devices Used Within DoD

Systems Engineering Capstone Marketplace Pilot

A Wireless Vital Signs System for Combat Casualties

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

The Army s Mission Command Battle Lab

VSE Corporation. Integrity - Agility - Value. VSE Corporation Proprietary Information

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

AFCEA TECHNET LAND FORCES EAST

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Transcription:

Revolutionary Logistics? Automatic Identification Technology EWS 2004 Subject Area Logistics REVOLUTIONARY LOGISTICS? AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY A. I. T. Prepared for Expeditionary Warfare School by: Capt Delsi A. R. CG #14 FACADS: Maj Watson Maj Nownes February 20, 2004

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 2004 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2004 to 00-00-2004 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Revolutionary Logistics? Automatic Identification Technology 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Marine Corps War College,Marine Corps University,Marine Corps Combat Development Command,Quantico,VA,22134-5067 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 10 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

CONTENTS I. Thesis II. Lack of logistical visibility a. Overview b. The Desert Wars III. Current system obsolete a. LOGAIS b. Other service systems IV. New Technology a. DoD AIT Office b. AIT mission V. How does AIT work? a. Basic foundation c. Radio Frequency (RF) Technology VI. Recent results a. Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) b. Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) VII. How will it benefit the Corps? a. Supports 21 st Century Expeditionary Concepts VIII. Conclusion 1

In today s global environment, commanders must know exactly where their assets are located and be able to act on this information. Accurate source data capture enables this capability and is critical to the Focused Logistics pillar and Information Superiority strategy of the Chairman s Vision for 2010... J. S. Gansler, November 12, 1997 The emerging technology of the 21 st century, such as Automatic Identification Technology (AIT) and our direction as a Corps towards Expeditionary Strike Groups (ESG), Operational Maneuver from the Sea (OMFTS), and Seabasing requires the Marine Corps to achieve total, real-time logistical asset visibility in order to increase our forces effectiveness, readiness, and sustainment for a growing joint force concept. LACK OF LOGISTICAL VISIBILITY The inability of a nation to generate sufficient forces, move them to the front, and support them once engaged invariably leads to deterioration of the forces material condition, morale, and tactical capability. This deterioration can be slow, as in the European theatre during World War II, or it can occur relatively quickly, as it did in Desert Storm. Both the will and the ability to fight erode, often leading to collapse and defeat. 1 Everyone will agree that logistics is a critical element to prepare, maintain, and sustain deployed forces within a theatre of war. Without effective logistics, battles cannot be won, culminating points are reached, and deployed forces are ineffective. Stockpiled logistics is yesterday s key for a 2

successful mission. The key element for the 21 st century is immediate asset visibility and just in time logistics. As evidenced during Operation Desert Storm, Marine ground forces had to take an operational pause in order to allow the logistical units to catch up. A culminating point was reached that affected tempo, focus of effort, and even morale. Twelve years later, Operation Iraqi Freedom showed signs of improvement. However, the updated systems, such as logistical software, asset visibility, or the simple task of requisitioning supplies were almost complete failures. Marines did not go hungry or thirsty, but the sustainment requirements of vehicle maintenance, coupled with successful requisitioning and delivering of class IX (repair parts), was virtually non-existent. Forward units on the move could not requisition the parts they needed. When they did get transactions processed, even the Combat Service Support Groups (CSSG) had many problems with the requisitioning process. There was no visibility of real-time unit inventories or location of those supplies. Vehicle cannibalization was the key process to allow units to keep moving forward, ultimately leading to a culminating point. The so what 2 from the past two desert wars is the need for a joint logistical requisitioning asset visibility system. 3

CURRENT SYSTEM OBSOLETE There are literally hundreds of logistical applications available and used by the military and civilian companies, such as the real-time logistics system of FEDEX. The Marine Corps utilizes the Logistics Automated Information System (LOGAIS). LOGAIS is a family of logistical software that supports all of the Marine Corps logistical needs from MPF to supply/maintenance management. The problem is that LOGAIS is not a joint system. The current demand for U.S. and NATO Joint Forces highlights LOGAIS as a non-practical or mutually supporting choice of logistical systems. LOGAIS does not interface with other service systems, such as the hi-tech system of the U.S. Army, the Automatic Identification Technology system. In the past, leaders may have stated that no software was available to support forward deployed units in a combat environment. Technology has caught up with requirements, and the military needs to embrace it as a joint force product. NEW TECHNOLOGY In 1997, the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) established the Department of Defense (DoD) Automatic Identification Technology (AIT) office with the mission to promote, manage, coordinate, and document the application of DoD and joint logistics AIT doctrine, technologies, and processes in support of the warfighters including the CinCs, joint task force (JTF) 4

commanders, military services, and DoD activities. 3 The creation of AIT within the DoD would not only begin the pursuit for a joint logistical doctrine, but it would also streamline the DoD s logistical pipeline, business processes and enhance its warfighting capability. 4 HOW DOES AIT WORK? Automatic Identification Technology is not a complex system. AIT is the basic foundation to provide real-time asset visibility for all logistical assets and processes. Emerging technology is the ultimate factor in the success of AIT. The ability to view real-time assets requires the latest technological hardware. The Army s Logistical Integration Agency, now the Logistics Transformation Agency (LTA) began utilizing identification tags embedded with radio frequency (RF) technology in 1999. The RFID system was installed at military sites around the world in order to track logistical assets. This system allowed LTA to achieve real-time visibility of all the contents within each container. In this process, RFID tags automatically emit a signal to a scanner; therefore each item does not have to be 5

manually scanned. The container merely has to be within scanning range in order for the RFID scanner to retrieve the signal, process it, and transmit it to the Identification Technology Visibility (ITV) server. Once the information is uploaded in the server, it can be viewed at near real-time. ITV servers are located in EUCOM (Europe Command), CENTCOM (Central Command), and PACOM (Pacific Command). These servers provide the data storage and transmission of AIT data. RECENT RESULTS Since 1999, AIT has progressed to be an extremely valuable asset. The integration of new technology with military logistical requirements has benefited not only whole units, but also individual troops. In 2001 during Operation Enduring Freedom, the combatant commander of USCENTCOM reported a logistical requirement that could finally be filled, in-thebox 5 visibility of all logistical materials in support of their forces. AIT had finally accomplished its 1997 implied inception task and proved its effectiveness during an actual war type situation. Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) was no different except this time no request for asset visibility was required. RFID tags were mandated for all material entering the theater in 6

order to track assets in real-time. Although only seven sites in Iraq were utilized, the results far surpassed initial expectations. The results reported at the DoD RFID Industry Summit on December 2, 2003 states In the CENTCOM AOR, (Area of Responsibility) the average unit readiness rate in the areas AIT was used was 90%. (July 93%, Aug 85%, and Sep 93%) 6 HOW WILL AIT BENEFIT THE CORPS? As the Marine Corps turns toward Expeditionary Strike Groups (ESG), Operational Maneuver from the Sea (OMFTS), and Seabasing, these concepts will rely heavily on the need for immediate sustainment capabilities in order to be effective in the first 10 days of operations. AIT allows the ESG to logistically plan on the go with a smaller footprint, while still maintaining a forward presence. The use of AIT logistics will achieve the most effective OMFTS possible and complement Seabasing. Waiting for parts or equipment can be deadly in combat. The use of AIT will allow logisticians to view, in real-time, what assets are available from ships, other units on the ground, and other services. AIT will also allow real time visibility of requisitions and what is shipped into theater. This information is vital in order to prevent a culminating point. As evidenced in Operation Iraqi Freedom, commercial off the shelf (COTS), small hand-held satellite devices can be utilized 7

in times of war. It is only a matter of time before technology will allow a forward unit with a hand-held satellite device, such as the device utilized by FEDEX, to view and requisition logistical assets from organic support units or a sister service. As AIT advances to the next level, sustaining the force will become more effective and efficient. AIT is not limited to materiel; it can also track personnel. The development of the Common Access Card (CAC) allows all services to easily and efficiently track all personnel and their records in and out of a theatre. CONCLUSION The Marine Corps must realize that an AIT transformation will enhance the effectiveness of logistical sustainment of the 21 st century expeditionary concepts. As the push for joint participation in combat increases, there has never been a better time for AIT. Automatic Identification Technology has progressed tremendously in the past several years. It provides a solid base to capture, track, and control logistical assets in real-time from one location. The 21 st century will demand the immediate sustainment of forces. AIT can provide the support needed to satisfy the combatant commanders requirements. 8

WORKS CITED 1 2 3 4 5 6 MCDP 4 Logistics pg 7 EWS FACAD Staff DoD AIT Office Website, www.dodait.com J.S. Gansler, Nov 12 1997, downloaded from www.dodait.com DoD AIT Office Website, www.dodait.com Summary of the DoD RFID Industry Summit on December 2, 2003, downloaded from www.dodait.com Slides downloaded from DoD RFID Industry Summit presentation held on December 2, 2003 from www.dodait.com MCDP 1 Warfighting MCDP 1-0 Marine Corps Operations Other websites used: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2003/05/mil-030527- usa02.htm Digital technology transforms logistics in Iraqi Freedom http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/dstorm/ds4.htm Logistics Operations in Desert Storm http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1991/dsp.htm Desert Shield/Desert Storm employment of the Maritime Prepositioning Force: Triumph or mixed success? 9