StratCom in Context: The Hidden Architecture of U.S. Militarism

Similar documents
Policy Responses to Nuclear Threats: Nuclear Posturing After the Cold War

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

U.S. Pacific Command NDIA Science & Engineering Technology Conference

Défense nationale, July US National Security Strategy and pre-emption. Hans M. KRISTENSEN

U.S. Nuclear Policy and World Nuclear Situation

What if the Obama Administration Changes US Nuclear Policy? Potential Effects on the Strategic Nuclear War Plan

Perspectives on the 2013 Budget Request and President Obama s Guidance on the Future of the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program

U.S. Nuclear Planning After the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review

Global Operations Update

FORWARD, READY, NOW!

The 2002 Unified Command Plan: Changes and Implications

United States Strategic Command

UNIT AWARDS JOINT MERITORIOUS UNIT AWARD... VALOROUS UNIT AWARD...

U.S. Nuclear Strategy After the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review

DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY TH STREET SOUTH, STE 203 ARLINGTON, VA

US Nuclear Policy: A Mixed Message

National Defense University. Institute for National Strategic Studies

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy (ASD(ISP))

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES. for FY 2011 and beyond

New Directions for Defense Programs Pacific Overview

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / International Intelligence Technology and Architectures. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 3

The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,

This block in the Interactive DA Framework is all about joint concepts. The primary reference document for joint operations concepts (or JOpsC) in

Current Army Operational Support

The Changing Face of the War Fighter

An Interview with Gen John E. Hyten

Foreign Policy and National Defense. Chapter 22

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Chapter , McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved.

We Produce the Future

Defending the Homeland: The Role of the Alaskan Command

Small Business Program

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL: THE END OF HISTORY?

Information Assurance (IA) and Interoperability (IOP) Evaluations

Nuclear Forces: Restore the Primacy of Deterrence

MATCHING: Match the term with its description.

StratCom in Context: The Hidden Architecture of U.S. Militarism* Introduction

Enlisted Information Dominance Warfare Specialist (EIDWS) Common Core

Terms. Administration Outlook. The Setting Massive Retaliation ( ) Eisenhower State of the Union Address (2/53)

Information Assurance (IA) and Interoperability (IOP)

Foreign Policy and Homeland Security

Advance Questions for General John E. Hyten, USAF Nominee for Commander, United States Strategic Command

USASMDC/ARSTRAT & JFCC IMD Update. Space and Missile Defense Capabilities for the Warfighter

Army Structure Update

I. Description of Operations Financed:

Reducing the waste in nuclear weapons modernization

PENTAGON SPENDING AT HISTORICALLY HIGH LEVELS FOR OVER A DECADE

North Korea's Nuclear Programme and Ballistic Missile Capabilities: An Assessment

Montessori Model United Nations. First Committee Disarmament and International Security

International and Regional Threats Posed by the LAWS: Russian Perspective

GREAT DECISIONS WEEK 8 NUCLEAR SECURITY

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN Steven Pifer Senior Fellow Director, Arms Control Initiative October 10, 2012

CYBER SECURITY PROTECTION. Section III of the DOD Cyber Strategy

A New World. The Cold War - Part 2

HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE-4. Subject: National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

Setting Priorities for Nuclear Modernization. By Lawrence J. Korb and Adam Mount February

THE NUCLEAR WORLD IN THE EARLY 21 ST CENTURY

The Executive Branch: Foreign Policy

1 Nuclear Weapons. Chapter 1 Issues in the International Community. Part I Security Environment Surrounding Japan

Foreign Policy and National Defense. Chapter 22

Why Japan Should Support No First Use

Space as a War-fighting Domain

Precision Strike Annual Review 11. Pacific Region

Strategic Deterrence for the Future

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON, DC

Joint Training: What NGA Needs from Combatant Commands (Help Us Help You!)

Analysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

New Global Missions for Strategic Command

Command Overview USASMDC/ARSTRAT. for the Huntsville Rotary Club. LTG Richard P. Formica 20 Sep Distribution A 1291 (As of 20 Sep 2011)

The U.S. Nuclear Posture in Korea

Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157)

National Defense University Foundation, Congressional Breakfast Series. 28 July LTG Formica Remarks as Prepared

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018

Global Vigilance, Global Reach, Global Power for America

SUB Hamburg A/ Nuclear Armament. GREENHAVEN PRESS A part of Gale, Cengage Learning. GALE CENGAGE Learning-

CRS Report for Congress

FOREWORD USASMDC/ARSTRAT COMMANDER S VISION

Missile Defense Program Overview For The European Union, Committee On Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee On Security And Defence

Modernization of US Nuclear Forces: Costs in Perspective

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Combat Support Agency Working Group (WG)/Worldwide Joint Training and Scheduling Conference

Missile Defense: Time to Go Big

The Need for a Strong U.S. Nuclear Deterrent In the 21 st Century. A White Paper By Franklin C. Miller

AFCEA Industry Days LTC Anthony K. Whitfield Product Manager, Wideband Enterprise Satellite Systems (PdM WESS) 9351 Hall Road (Bldg.

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

October 2017 SWIM CALL

Living in the Shadow of Annihilation: Nuclear Weapons and the Cold War. First Soviet A-Bomb detonated First Soviet H-Bomb Detonated

Banning Ballistic Missiles? Missile Control for a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World

Prompt Global Strike Plan

Global Strike A Chronology of the Pentagon s New Offensive Strike Plan

Deputy Director, C5 Integration

President Obama and National Security

Lieutenant General Maryanne Miller Chief of Air Force Reserve Commander, Air Force Reserve Command

DBQ 20: THE COLD WAR BEGINS

Defense Policies of Countries

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Counterproliferation (CP) Implementation

Threats to Peace and Prosperity

DBQ 13: Start of the Cold War

Transcription:

Slide 1 StratCom in Context: The Hidden Architecture of U.S. Militarism Jacqueline Cabasso Western States Legal Foundation April 12, 2008 Presented at the 16 th Annual Space Organizing Conference Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space StratCom: The Most Dangerous Place on the Face of the Earth April 11 13, 2008 Omaha, Nebraska

Slide 2 Our Mission: Provide the nation with global deterrence capabilities and synchronized DoD effects to combat adversary weapons of mass destruction worldwide. Enable decisive global kinetic and non-kinetic combat effects through the application and advocacy of integrated intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR); space and global strike operations; information operations; integrated missile defense and robust command and control. United States Strategic Command: http://www.stratcom.mil/

Slide 3 US Military Troops and Bases Around the World, 2002 Sources: Dept. of Defense, Base Structure Report, FY 02 and Active Duty Military Personnel Strengths by Regional area and by Country, Dec. 31, 2001 : Zoltan Grossman, New U.S. Military Bases, Feb. 2, 2002; Monthly Review, 2002 http://dusteye.files.wordpress.com/2007/03/usmilitarymap.jpg

Slide 4 Unified Combatant Commands (6 geographic and 4 functional) United States Northern Command (NORTHCOM) United States Africa Command (AFRICOM) United States Central Command (CENTCOM) United States European Command (EUCOM) U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM) U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) U.S. Joint Forces Command (JFCOM) U.S. Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/u.s._armed_forces. Wikipedia summaries are abstracted from information available from the United States Department of Defense at http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/unifiedcommand/

Slide 5 Map of the United States Unified Combatant Commands. Map reflects 2002 move of Syria and Lebanon to USCENTCOM; does not show USAFRICOM as announced in February 2007. Official map at: http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/unifiedcommand/. Map with caption at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/unified_combat_command

Slide 6 https://www.defenselink.mil/home/pdf/africom_publicbrief02022007.pdf

Slide 7 Our Mission: Provide the nation with global deterrence capabilities and synchronized DoD effects to combat adversary weapons of mass destruction worldwide. Enable decisive global kinetic and non-kinetic combat effects through the application and advocacy of integrated intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR); space and global strike operations; information operations; integrated missile defense and robust command and control. United States Strategic Command: http://www.stratcom.mil/

Slide 8 America must not ignore the threats gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof the smoking gun that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud. - President Bush outlines Iraqi Threat, 10/7/02 President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat Remarks by the President on Iraq Cincinnati Museum Center - Cincinnati Union Terminal Cincinnati, Ohio, October 7, 2002 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021007-8.html

Slide 9 Published on Sunday, January 26, 2003 by the Los Angeles Times The Nuclear Option in Iraq The U.S. has lowered the bar for using the ultimate weapon by William M. Arkin WASHINGTON -- One year after President Bush labeled Iraq, Iran and North Korea the "axis of evil," the United States is thinking about the unthinkable: It is preparing for the possible use of nuclear weapons against Iraq. At the U.S. Strategic Command (STRATCOM) in Omaha and inside planning cells of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, target lists are being scrutinized, options are being pondered and procedures are being tested to give nuclear armaments a role in the new U.S. doctrine of "preemption. According to multiple sources close to the process, the current planning focuses on two possible roles for nuclear weapons: attacking Iraqi facilities located so deep underground that they might be impervious to conventional explosives; thwarting Iraq's use of weapons of mass destruction.... William M. Arkin, The Nuclear Option in Iraq: The U.S. has lowered the bar for using the ultimate weapon, Los Angeles Times, January 26, 2003, reproduced at http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0126-01.htm

Slide 10 US Military Invasions 1796-2006 'Fighting for Freedom' -- America's Abiding Myth By Gar Smith / The-Edge July 27, 2006 http://www.earthisland.org/project/newspage2.cfm?newsid=844&pageid=177&subsiteid=44

Slide 11 Department of Defense Briefing Slide, January 9, 2002 http://www.defenselink.mil/dodcmsshare/briefingslide%5c120%5c020109-d-6570c-010.jpg

Slide 12 The Old Strategic Triad: Bombers ICBMs (InterContinental Ballistic Missiles) SLBMs (Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles

Slide 13 Department of Defense Briefing Slide, January 9, 2002 http://www.defenselink.mil/dodcmsshare/briefingslide%5c120%5c020109-d-6570c-010.jpg

Slide 14 Missile Defense Agency US Department of Defense http://www.mda.mil/mdalink/pdf/bmdsbook.pdf

Slide 15 Khalil Bendib, June 2, 2003 Available at www.bendib.org

Slide 16 The United States is far and away the global leader in military spending. The United States spends more than the next 45 highest spending countries in the world combined. The United States accounts for 48 percent of the world's total military spending. The United States spends on its military 5.8 times more than China, 10.2 times more than Russia, and 98.6 times more than Iran. The United States and its strongest allies (the NATO countries, Japan, South Korea and Australia) spend $1.1 trillion on their militaries combined, representing 72 percent of the world's total. Christopher Hellman and Travis Sharp, Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, The FY 2009 Pentagon Spending Request Global Military Spending, February 22, 2008, http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/policy/securityspending/articles/fy09_dod_request_global/

Slide 17 Christopher Hellman and Travis Sharp, Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, The FY 2009 Pentagon Spending Request Global Military Spending, February 22, 2008, http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/policy/securityspending/articles/fy09_dod_request_global/

Slide 18 Western States Legal Foundation 655 13 th Street, Suite 201 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 839-5877 wslf@earthlink.net www.wslfweb.org